The King Road Killings BONUS: The 911 call

Summary

Podcast Summary: 20/20 – "The King Road Killings BONUS: The 911 Call"

Release Date: March 15, 2025
Host/Author: ABC News
Episode: The King Road Killings BONUS: The 911 Call

---

Introduction

In this bonus episode of ABC News' "20/20," host Kena Whitworth delves deeper into the harrowing case known as the King Road Killings. With Bryan Kohberger's trial looming just five months away, newfound transparency has begun to emerge, shedding light on previously sealed court documents and, notably, the first-ever public release of the critical 911 call made seven hours after the tragic murders.

Overview of the Case

Bryan Kohberger stands accused of the brutal killings of Kaylee Gonzalez, Madison Mogan, Zanna Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin on King Road, Moscow, Idaho. Initially handled by Judge John Judge, the case has recently seen a significant shift in both venue and judicial oversight, moving from Moscow to Boise under the new jurisdiction of Judge Steven Hippler.

Shift of Venue and New Judge

The relocation of the trial from Moscow to Boise marked a pivotal change, bringing in Judge Steven Hippler, who has expressed frustration over the previous handling of the case. Judge Hippler criticized both the prosecution and defense for attempting to seal numerous documents, arguing that such secrecy infringes upon the public's First Amendment rights to be informed. He stated:

“[Judge Hippler]: ...the prosecution and defense have been trying to seal so much of the material that will be presented in court... this is some of the information that the public, that the journalists and frankly, the families have been waiting so long to hear.”
– [28:10]

Released 911 Call

A cornerstone of this episode is the detailed examination of the newly released 911 call made at 11:55 AM, over seven hours after the murders occurred between 4:00 and 4:20 AM. This call provides a raw and emotional glimpse into the immediate aftermath of the tragedy.

The Call Transcript

The episode presents the full 911 call, highlighting the desperation and chaos experienced by the callers. Listeners hear multiple voices, frustration from the dispatcher, and the urgent attempts to assist a collapsed roommate, Zanna Kernodle.

Analysis by Julie Scott

ABC News contributor Julie Scott offers her insights after hearing the call:

“The 911 call is truly astonishing and emotional, and it puts you back in that scene... you hear different people on the call and the dispatcher clearly getting frustrated... It shakes me. It's one thing to read it. It's another to hear it.”
– [08:52]

Scott emphasizes the call's ability to convey the fear and confusion of those involved, providing a visceral connection to the events that unfolded.

Text Message Correspondence

The episode also explores the exchange of text messages between the surviving roommates during the critical hours. These messages reveal the timeline and the roommates' attempts to reach out to each other amidst the unfolding tragedy.

“We have a timeline now with the verbatim of text messages coming back and forth between 4 and 4:30, roughly... it shakes me.”
– Julie Scott, [12:11]

DNA Evidence

A significant development discussed is the DNA evidence linking Kohberger to the crime scene. Prosecutors assert that Kohberger's DNA was found on the knife sheath beneath Madison Mogan, a key piece of evidence obtained through investigative genetic genealogy.

Additional DNA Findings:

• Three unidentified male DNA profiles were discovered:
  • Blood on a handrail between the first and second floors.
  • DNA on a glove outside the home.
  • A mixed DNA sample beneath Madison's fingernails containing three separate profiles.

Defense Arguments on DNA Evidence

The defense team challenges the significance of the mixed DNA found under Madison's fingernails, arguing its inconclusive nature:

“...when he touches an object, his skin cells don't flake off at the same rate that yours do... if Bryan Kohberger's DNA is not under their fingernails, they've got a pretty decent argument there.”
– Kena Whitworth, [24:00]

This strategic move aims to cast doubt on the prosecution's DNA claims, suggesting that the presence of multiple DNA profiles complicates the link to Kohberger.

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Defense Argument

In a groundbreaking development, Kohberger's defense has filed a motion to exclude the death penalty, citing Kohberger's Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) as a mitigating factor. This argument is multifaceted:

1. Non-Culpability Due to ASD:

   • The defense argues that Kohberger's ASD diminishes his culpability, making him ineligible for the death penalty.

2. Impact on Sentencing Phase:

   • They suggest that Kohberger's ASD could hinder his ability to effectively defend himself during the sentencing phase, potentially swaying the jury's perception.

3. Media Influence:

   • Concerns are raised about media portrayals and social media influence creating a biased narrative against Kohberger.

Julie Scott provides a detailed explanation:

“The defense is saying that the surviving roommate was sufficiently consistent with the important points about the description of the man in black.”
– Julie Scott, [16:00]

Furthermore, Judge Hippler acknowledged the validity of the defense's concerns regarding Kohberger's ASD:

“...this roommate had given many interviews and that they essentially told the same version of the same story... her own statements about her memory or the effects of alcohol were not enough to doubt her reliability.”
– [17:34]

Judge Hippler's Commitment to Transparency

Judge Hippler has taken a definitive stance towards ensuring transparency in the trial proceedings. His approach contrasts sharply with his predecessor, aiming to balance Kohberger's rights with the public's interest:

“...the families, the media, just the case in general, the public saw how the information was rolling out and said, okay, we need a new change of course.”
– Kena Whitworth, [28:49]

Future of the Case

As the trial approaches, several key developments loom:

• Death Penalty Motion: The defense's late-stage introduction of the ASD argument could significantly impact sentencing if Kohberger is found guilty.

• Execution Methods: Idaho's Governor Brad Little has signed a bill making firing squad the primary method of execution, set to take effect in July 2026, adding another layer of complexity to the potential sentencing outcomes.

• Trial Proceedings: With increased transparency, upcoming filings and witness testimonies are expected to provide further clarity, potentially reshaping public perception and legal strategies.

Conclusion

This bonus episode of "20/20" offers an in-depth exploration of the King Road Killings case, emphasizing recent revelations that could influence Bryan Kohberger's trial. From the emotional 911 call to intricate DNA evidence debates and the nuanced introduction of ASD as a defense strategy, the episode paints a comprehensive picture of the unfolding legal battle. As the nation watches closely, the commitment to transparency under Judge Hippler heralds a potentially transformative phase in this high-profile case.

---

Notable Quotes:

“The 911 call is truly astonishing and emotional, and it puts you back in that scene...”
– Julie Scott, [08:52]

“[Judge Hippler]: ...the prosecution and defense have been trying to seal so much of the material that will be presented in court...”
– [28:10]

“...when he touches an object, his skin cells don't flake off at the same rate that yours do...”
– Kena Whitworth, [24:00]

---

This comprehensive summary captures the essence of the episode, highlighting critical discussions, insights, and the multifaceted nature of the ongoing legal proceedings.

Transcript

[Kena Whitworth]

Hi there, 2020 listeners.

[Debra Roberts]

This is Debra Roberts, co anchor of 20 20. Here's Kena Whitworth with a bonus episode.

[Julie Scott]

Of the King Road Killings.

[Debra Roberts]

Oh, sheet. Honey, chill. It's just laundry.

[Julie Scott]

Not that I'm talking about these Arm and Hammer Power sheets. All the power of Arm and Hammer.

[Kena Whitworth]

Laundry detergent and a convenient tossable sheet.

[Debra Roberts]

Oh, sheet.

[Kena Whitworth]

That's what I'm saying.

[Debra Roberts]

And Arm and Hammer Power sheets deliver an effective clean at a great price.

[Julie Scott]

Think of all the laundry we'll do and all the money we'll oh, sheet, arm and hammer.

[Kena Whitworth]

More power to you.

[Debra Roberts]

Your data is like gold to hackers. They'll sell it to the highest bidder.

[Julie Scott]

Are you protected?

[Debra Roberts]

McAfee helps shield you, blocking suspicious texts, malicious emails and fraudulent websites. McAfee Secure VPN lets you browse safely and its AI powered tech scam detector spots threats instantly. You'll also get up to $2 million of award winning antivirus and identity theft protection, all for just $39.99 for your first year. Visit Mac McAfee.com/incancel anytime terms apply. Hi, it's Kayna Whitworth. Welcome to a bonus episode of the King Road Killings. With Bryan Coburger's trial just five months away, there's been a lot of secrecy surrounding the case. Some of that came to an end in recent days with the release of key court documents. And now for the first time, we heard the 911 call. It was made over seven hours after Kaylee Gonzalez, Madison Mogan, Zanna Kernodle and Ethan Chapin were killed. In this episode, we're going to play that call for you in full. This sudden flurry of information is in part because of the change of venue which moved the location of the trial from Moscow, Idaho, where the murders took place, to Boise. With that change came a new judge who was assigned to the case in November, Judge Steven Hippler. And Hippler seemingly has lost patience with the way the case has been handled so far. He said the case is infringed on the public's First Amendment right to know about the court's progress because the prosecution and defense have been trying to seal so much of the material that will be presented in court. What we've learned in the past few days could change the way we see this whole case and answer questions that have been brewing since the murders happened more than two years ago. In this episode, I'm going to talk with two people who've been following this case closely. First, we'll speak with ABC News contributor Julie Scott. She's a journalist who's based in Moscow, Idaho. And then I'll be joined by ABC News legal contributor Brian Buckmire to talk about the legal strategy that's been playing out behind closed doors. Julie, I want to jump right into this 911 call because it's never been heard publicly before. And a reminder, this is the call that was made more than seven hours after the horrifying murders and it was placed just before noon the following day.

[Julie Scott]

Thanks, Kaina. As you know, we've been following this for a long time and what's been shrouded in secrecy has been what happened during those hours. We know from the probable cause affidavit that law enforcement thinks that the murders happened between 4 and 4:20 roughly. But we didn't know is what happened after that.

[Debra Roberts]

Yeah. And until now that period of time has been a mystery. But a new filing shows us that during the night there were several instances where one of the surviving roommates tried to call and text their friends in the house. And then hours of silence. At 10:23am one of the surviving roommates texts Haley and Madison saying please answer. Are you up? And it's not until 1155 that 911 is called. We're going to play that call for you now. It's very chaotic and at times uncomfortable. The whole thing is about four minutes long.

[911 Dispatcher]

911, location of your emergency. Hi. Something is happening. Something's happened to not help. We don't know what. What is the address of the emergency? 112 2. What is the rest of the address? Oh, Kings Road. Okay, and is that a house or an apartment? It's a house. Can you repeat the address to make sure that I have it right? I'll talk to you as we're. We live at the White Spot over next to them. I need someone to repeat the address for verification. The. The address? 1122 King Road. And what's the phone number that you're calling from? What's your phone number? And tell me exactly what's going on. One of our. One of the roommates has passed out and she was drunk last night and she not wake me up. Oh, and they saw some man in their house last night.

[Kena Whitworth]

Yeah.

[911 Dispatcher]

Hi, this is. And are you with the patient? Okay, I need someone to keep the phone, stop passing it around. Can I just tell you what happened? Pretty much what is going on currently. Is someone passed out right now? I don't really know, but pretty much at 4am Okay, I need to know what's going on right now. If someone has passed out, can you find that out? Yeah, I'll come. Come on. We gotta go check, but we have to. She's not waking up. Okay, one moment. I'm getting help started that way. Okay. And how old is she? She's 20. 20, you said? Yes, 20. Hello? Hello? Okay, I need someone to stop passing the phone around because I've talked to four different people. Sorry, they just gave me the phone. Is she breathing? Hello? Is she breathing? No. Okay, talking to them. Say, I can't talk to them. I need you to talk to them. Hello? Okay, I have already sent the ambulance and law enforcement. Stay on the line. If there is a defibrillator available, send someone to get it now and tell me when you have it. Say that again. There's a point here right now. Okay. If there's a defibrillator available, send someone to get it now and tell me when you have it. Do you have a defibrillator? Yep. Yes. You have one? Are you talking to the officer? Yes. Okay, I'm gonna let you go since he's there with you and can help you. Okay, thank you.

[Julie Scott]

Bye.

[911 Dispatcher]

Okay.

[Debra Roberts]

You can hear the agony in a lot of this call, Julie, after listening to it. What are your thoughts hearing now?

[Julie Scott]

The 911 call is truly astonishing and emotional, and it puts you back in that scene. It wasn't just the two surviving roommates on the phone with dispatch. There were friends, and we knew that friends were called to come to the house. But what we're hearing is chaos and disbelief and screams. You hear different people on the call and the dispatcher clearly getting frustrated and the dispatcher asking them to please go check. Go check and see if this person. What is happening right now. That's what the dispatcher wants to know, what's happening right now so she can alert police. And you hear that attempt to go check on their roommate, their friend. And you hear faint. You can hear it in the background. The name. It's Zanna. She's not waking up. And they're trying to explain what happened or what they think they saw or heard. Can I just tell you what happened, what I think happened? The dispatcher is asking them, who's ever on the phone, please go check. I need to know what the emergency is. It's still unclear. And who's ever on the phone at that time says, we have to go check. We have to. And there's resistance, there's fear. I don't like. I don't want to, but we have to. It shakes me. It's one thing to read it. It's another to hear it.

[Debra Roberts]

In this moment, I'm reminded of a conversation I had a while ago with Kaylee Gonzalez's mom. And Christy told me that she really hoped the 911 call would never come out. She didn't want to hear it for whatever reason. All the details of this case, this is one of the hardest parts for her. It's been incredibly unsettling. And now that it's been released, the family gave me a statement about it. I'm going to read part of it for you. It says it's raw, it's jagged. A searing, unvarnished truth that no camera could ever hope to capture. Every breath, every cry, every tremor in the voice reveals a reality so cruel, so brutally honest, it cuts deeper than anything fiction could ever devise. It's all so unbelievable. And the thing is, is that while we have a lot more questions than answers after this call was released, the audio of it, we do have a transcript of the call. We also have transcripts of these text messages now. And so we sort of have an order of events here, Julie. And what does that really reveal?

[Julie Scott]

We have a timeline now with the verbatim of text messages coming back and forth between 4 and 4:30, roughly. And it's the two surviving roommates discussing what one of the roommates saw. All we had was what was in the affidavit. And that in itself, it shakes me. She opened her door three times during that time period. She described seeing someone clad in black with bushy eyebrows. And when she saw that man, she then went and retreated to her room and locked the door. And that's what we knew. Now we know that she was corresponding with the other roommate about those actual events.

[Debra Roberts]

I have this filing in front of me. It starts to really give you the timeline here. From 4:19 to 4:21, the surviving roommate on the second floor, the one who told authorities she saw someone clad in black in the home, attempts to call not only the roommate on the first floor, but also Zanna Kernodle, Kaylee Gonzalez and Madison Mogan. The filing says all of those calls are unanswered. Then between 4:22 and 4:24, she texts back and forth with the surviving roommate on the first floor. And it starts with the roommate on the second floor saying, no one is answering. I'm really confused. Then the roommate on the first floor sends a text message to the roommate on the second floor saying, yeah, dude, wtf? Zanna was wearing all black. Next text is from the Roommate on the second floor to the roommate on the first floor saying, no, it's like a ski mask almost, right?

[Julie Scott]

So in the confusion, she's thinking, and we can go back to the probable cause affidavit, but she's thinking, what did I just see? Was that Zanna or. No, it can't be, because there was someone in a ski mask that's giving the first signs of a description of what the surviving roommate actually saw.

[Debra Roberts]

And then you really see the fear set in. And the roommate there on the first floor saying, Come to my room. Run down here. 4:27, the roommate on the second floor again calls Kaylee Gonzalves. And at 4:32, pleading with her over text message to answer her phone.

[Julie Scott]

I mean, it sends chills every time I look at that correspondence. But we know at that point, most likely from the probable cause affidavit and the police reports, that Kaylee is probably dead at that point.

[Debra Roberts]

And as we learn about these text messages, we learn about the 911 call. This is all after Co Burger's lead attorney, Ann Taylor, has really tried to create some questions about the surviving roommate, about her credibility overall. And they even bring up this description of bushy eyebrows. And right now, Kohberger's defense team does not want her to be able to use that description in court, which is really interesting.

[Julie Scott]

Again, we're learning a lot of information that we never had. We didn't have a description of the surviving roommate's room. But Kohberger's team is saying that when police photographed the crime scene right after the killings, her room was found to have had many pictures of eyes with prominent eyebrows on the walls in a room, many of which, and this is a direct quote, many of which she had drawn. Some of the eyebrows are heavy. They have volume, they're puffy, or perhaps subjectively bushy. And then there was artwork of human figures with an emphasis on the eyes and eyebrows. So in prior hearings, defense attorney Ann Taylor had said that the roommate had admitted she had too much to drink and could not remember. And that is a direct quote. The defense is saying that the numerous stories that were given after the murders by the surviving roommate are inconsistent. And what they're trying to paint here, and you can see what's happening, they are saying that the roommate was drunk, was in a dreamlike state, and they're saying that maybe this is what she saw was in her room. But the prosecution is saying that the surviving roommate was sufficiently consistent with the important points about the description of the man in black.

[Debra Roberts]

Well, Right. And actually, in a recent filing, we heard Judge Hippler comment that this roommate had given many interviews and that they essentially told the same version of the same story. He said that this roommate's own statements about her memory or the effects of alcohol were not enough to doubt her reliability. He also said that she was able to consistently articulate what she remembered. But it's perhaps no surprise that we see the defense trying to throw doubt wherever they can. This is a death penalty case. In fact, that's another development we learned in recent days. The defense has filed a motion to strike the death penalty, and they cited what they say is Kohberger's Autism Spectrum disorder as the reason. They're insinuating that Kohberger's autism and the way that he acts could bias the jury.

[Julie Scott]

It's a really interesting argument. Let's start first with the definition from the National Institutes of Health. Autism Spectrum Disorder is a neurological and developmental disorder that affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn, and behave. The defense hired their own expert to assess Bryan Kohberger's asd, And they say that Bryan Kohberger has many of the traits that line up with Autism Spectrum Disorder, that his range of facial expressions is limited, and his expressions are sometimes incongruent with what is happening around him. He has these intense periods where he's staring, or what they say is an intense gaze. And you've been in court, you've sat very close to Bryan Kohberger. I have sat very close to Bryan Kohberger. He has certain demeanors that stand out.

[Debra Roberts]

For anybody that's been following this case. You have heard descriptions of what Bryan Kohberger was like, generally. If you've listened to our podcast, we were able to speak with some people who were part of his graduate program at Washington State University. And the descriptions about his behavior are. Is that he's a bit of a loner all the time. He was a bit of an outcast. He was a bit awkward. And his lawyers say flat out, it's no surprise that Coburger came across as socially awkward. His lawyers writing that an impairment like that is a hallmark of his disability. And they think that will work against him in the court of law. And according to his lawyers, the neuropsychologists that evaluated Kohberger found that his Autism Spectrum disorder had a significant impact on his life.

[Julie Scott]

Not only on his life, but on this case. The defense team is saying that he does not think the same, that he's. It's. It's difficult at times because of this asd.

[Debra Roberts]

All right, thanks Julie, as always for your insight there on the ground in Moscow.

[Julie Scott]

Thank you, Kayna.

[Debra Roberts]

We'll be right back after a short break.

[Brian Buckmire]

Who doesn't love a good family mystery, especially one with as many twists and turns as June's Journey? You'll step into the role of June Parker and search for hidden clues to uncover dark secrets at her sister's estate and unravel the truth behind her sister's mysterious death. The roaring 1920s spring to life along this journey as you explore stunning hidden object scenes from New York parlors to Parisian sidewalks. And with all that mystery, danger and romance, you'll be left wondering just where each new chapter will take you. As you dive into June's captivating quest, you'll also unleash your own creativity, customizing your very own luxurious estate island, complete with sprawling gardens and stunning architecture. Along the way, you'll collect scraps of information to fill your photo album and learn more about each character in the story. Chat and play with or against other players by joining a detective club. You'll even get a chance to play in a detective league that'll really put your sleuthing skills to the test. So escape reality and lose yourself in this captivating quest of mystery, murder and romance set in the roaring 1920s. Discover your inner detective when you download June's Journey for free today on iOS and Android.

[Debra Roberts]

I can say to my new Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, hey, find a keto friendly restaurant nearby and text it to Beth and Steve. And it does without me lifting a finger so I can get in more squats anywhere I can. 1, 2, 3.

[Kena Whitworth]

Will that be cash or credit?

[Julie Scott]

Credit.

[Kena Whitworth]

4 Galaxy S25 Ultra the AI companion that does the heavy lifting so you can do you get [e-mail] compatible select apps requires Google Gemini account. Results may vary based on input. Check responses for accuracy.

[Debra Roberts]

We're going to talk now about DNA. In these recent filings, prosecutors say Coburger's DNA was found on the knife sheath underneath Maddie and that has been the linchpin in this case. As a reminder, Kohberger was arrested at his parents home in Pennsylvania after a six week manhunt. Authorities used investigative genetic genealogy from the knife sheath DNA to link Kohberger to the crime. But what these newly released documents show us is more information about other DNA evidence. We've known that three other unidentified male profiles were found inside the home on King Road, but now we know where those samples were found. One was found in blood on a handrail between the first and Second floor, the other on a glove outside the home. And in these new filings, there is mention of an unknown mixture of DNA underneath Maddy's fingernails. Three separate profiles are present. According to the defense. It's a lot. But I want to narrow in on the DNA samples found under her fingernails because the documents also show that the defense is trying to limit testimony related to that three person mixture. So we take this question to ABC News legal contributor Brian Buckmire, because why would the defense want to exclude that information if the results don't seem to point to directly to Kohberger?

[Kena Whitworth]

The easy answer, and again, I'll just say I'm a former public defender, so I'm more aligned with what Ann Taylor does in this case. And so maybe my bias comes out in talking about this case to some degree. But the easy answer is, when the DNA helps you, you want it in. When the DNA doesn't help you, you want it out. So I've done this exact argument in Brooklyn. Let me explain it. And I think after explaining it, you and your listeners will completely understand where the defense is going with this. Right? So let's take a gun, for example. I touch it, you touch it, Julie touches it. They would not be able to distinguish my DNA from your DNA from Julie's DNA, because so many contributors were on it, they would say it's inconclusive. Another reason why they might not say it's conclusive or it's inconclusive is they can only test, and this is specific to New York. If there are 20, and the way they measure DNA is picograms. If there are 20 picograms of that sample. So if for whatever reason, when I touch an object, my skin cells don't flake off at the same rate that yours do. For example, Kaina and I only drop 10 picograms of DNA, but you drop 30, there'd be male DNA on that object, but they would call that inconclusive. And what the defense is arguing here is if you can't say whether or not Bryan Kohberger is under these fingernails, what's the relevance of that information? All you're able to say is a human being is under this person's fingernails, and that's not relevant, that's not helping the jury, and that information should not be presented. Now, they took that information and took it to another lab. And again, I'm talking specifically to New York, can only calculate 20 picograms and four or less people. But there are other labs around the country that have more sensitive Instruments, so they can detect less than 20 picograms. They can detect if four or more people have touched an object. So from my understanding is they went to another lab that has more sensitive instruments, and when they ran it through that instrument, they were able to say that Bryan Kohlberg is excluded. Because in a case where someone has brutally murdered four individuals, you would suspect that there would be defensive wounds on that individual and the victim would have scratched that person. And so if Bryan Kohberger's DNA is not under their fingernails, they've got a pretty decent argument there.

[Debra Roberts]

Does that independent lab result get presented to the jury? And is that something his defense team paid to do?

[Kena Whitworth]

So, yes and yes. So, yes, it would be presented to the jury if the defense felt it necessary to put on their own case, and I would suspect that they would.

[Debra Roberts]

So why is his defense team then arguing that none of this should be admitted? As opposed to arguing, we want to make sure that we can let the jury know our independent labor cleared him in this instance.

[Kena Whitworth]

So for two reasons. One is you want to get multiple bites at the apple. Let's say this. Let's say I say, Kayna, I want to be on your podcast for a number of reasons. I dress really well. I'm a defense attorney, and I know, like, the strategy behind this is my strongest argument probably that I know the strategy of another public defender. Yeah. But I'm also going to have those other two arguments, because maybe you're going to go, Brian. I want Brian on. Because I like his suits, and I don't know which argument's really gonna win. So I just throw everyone out. And that's what every defense attorney does. The other reason is you're not just arguing to the judge in front of you. You're also arguing to the appellate judge. Because at some point in time, if Bryan Kohberger is found guilty, you cannot raise arguments on appeal that you did not raise at trial, and you don't know who that appellate judge is gonna be. It's those two reasons why you throw everything at a judge.

[Debra Roberts]

The dressing well is definitely a better argument for TV than for audio. But for anyone listening, the man can dress. Okay, so we can't talk about these documents, though, without talking about the judge that is overseeing this case, Judge Hipler. He's moving this along rapidly. It's very different from the approach of Judge John Judge in Moscow. Judge Hippler has expressed frustration about the secrecy involving the case. Here's what he had to say during a hearing in January.

[Kena Whitworth]

I am as I told the parties yesterday, particularly sensitive about closing things when we don't need to. And I think that there has been, to date, a over caution in asking that I seal things by stipulation that perhaps don't need to be sealed.

[Debra Roberts]

There's been so much that we don't know, which is part of the reason why these filings have been so explosive, because this is some of the information that the public, that the journalists and frankly, the families have been waiting so long to hear. So what do you think about this general commitment here to transparency on a case that the nation is watching?

[Kena Whitworth]

I think this judge saw, as we all did, how. And I'm not trying to speak poorly of Judge John Judge or anyone else who was on the case prior to. I think it's a difference of opinion, difference of style. But I think this new judge saw how the families, the media, just the case in general, the public saw how the information was rolling out and said, okay, we need a new change of course. We need one that will still uphold Bryan Kohberger's constitutional rights to a fair and impartial trial, but also inform those who are most interested in this case and have a vested interest in the facts as they come out. And so I think that's the balance that this new judge is trying to strike.

[Debra Roberts]

Obviously, the stakes of this case are huge. We know that CO Burger's defense team has tried to strike the death penalty before. That being said, they have not brought up the claim that their client has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. This is new information to the judge and to the public. So why bring it up now, seemingly so late in the game?

[Kena Whitworth]

So, again, I'm not a defense attorney on this team, but I can only theorize why. One main reason could be they didn't have the information. Maybe Bryan Kohberger wasn't evaluated. Maybe the report by whoever evaluated him wasn't done. When you evaluate an individual, especially one who's incarcerated, you've got to cut through the red tape of, hey, I need an expert to go and sit down and talk with my client. So it's a red tape of getting that done. The other thing, too, could just be strategy. Maybe they think this is one of their stronger arguments and they wanted to kind of leave it on the last doorstep of this case. Kind of like the final push. In 2002, there was a Supreme Court case called Atkins v. Virginia. And in that Supreme Court case, it basically said, the United States of America cannot put people who have severe disability to death. So that just became the Law of the land. And that snowballed into making different arguments. A lot of them which we are seeing here. Now. There are five main arguments in this 28 page motion. The first three, I would say could be categorized as he has ASD and because of that he is not culpable enough, like not guilty enough to be executed. Executing people with ASD falls in line with that kind of idea that we, we can't do this. The Supreme Court says we can't do it. The fourth argument is a very unique one. I haven't seen it, and very interesting. But everyone has the right in what's going to be a bifurcated case. And what I mean by bifurcated is first the jury will decide guilt or innocence, and then the jury will decide the sentencing as to whether or not he gets put to death. I don't think Bryan Kohberger's gonna testify at the guilt phase to decide whether or not he's guilty or not. Maybe he will, but if I'm a betting man, I say no. But if he's found guilty, I definitely think it would behoove him or be in his interest to testify at that sentencing phase. And that's what the defense is talking about here, that if he was to take that opportunity to testify in that sentencing phase, to fight for his life, his mannerisms, in the way his affect is, people will look at him and be like, that looks like a cold blooded killer. That's gonna take away his right to be able to defend himself. And that's why the death penalty should not be there. I think they bolster that argument in the fifth and final argument of this motion of saying, look, the media is already doing it. We're looking at him in these pictures and we're looking at social media and the way people describe him as this menacing figure. It's already happening and that's going to taint the jury. That's going to happen again when he testifies in the sentencing phase and because of that ASD should rule out the death penalty.

[Debra Roberts]

And just sort of lastly, and generally from a defense attorney standpoint, you don't think that this, some of this throwing everything at the wall is being done to avoid being accused of being ineffective counsel?

[Kena Whitworth]

No, I think what it is, is you have a public defender, a person who went to law school and chose to pick a profession where they feel they are representing individuals that but for them would not have the form of representation that Ann Taylor is giving, which I still think is amazing. And they're trying to save someone's life. And so if you were in the mindset of I am doing the righteous work of a public defender and trying to save someone's life, you throw everything at the wall to try to do so. And I think that's what Ann Taylor's doing. I think say what you want about Bryan Kohberger, but if you were sitting in his seat, you would want a person to throw everything at the wall to save your life.

[Debra Roberts]

Well, Brian, as always, we appreciate your analysis on the legality of all of this, but also your commitment to this story. Thank you for being here us.

[Kena Whitworth]

Absolutely. My pleasure.

[Debra Roberts]

As a reminder, a not guilty plea has been entered on Coburger's behalf. We've recently learned from a filing by the prosecution that Coburger's defense team plans to argue that their client's DNA on the knife sheath does not prove he was ever in the home. The filing suggests the defense will argue the knife sheath sheath itself could have been planted by the real perpetrator. Hoberger remains the only suspect in the case. One other update before we go Idaho's Governor Brad Little just signed a bill to make Idaho the only state in the country where firing squad is the main means of execution. This will go into effect in July of 2026. And that does it for this bonus episode of King Road Killings. And I have to say, we're two years into this story and I feel like we've just gotten started. So be sure to subscribe to the King Road Killings to hear Season two Bryan Kohberger on trial. We'll be bringing you episodes twice a week on the trial, so follow and listen wherever you get your podcasts. This episode was produced by by Madeline Wood with help from Sasha Pesnik, Josh Margolin, Sasha Eslenian, Trevor Hastings, and Jenna Harrison. Laura Mayer is the executive producer of ABC Audio.

[Kena Whitworth]

I'm this weird part of my life. I really am. Bill Burr, Drop Dead Years, a hilarious stand up special is now streaming on Hulu.

[Julie Scott]

I am getting along with my wife.

[Kena Whitworth]

Better than I ever have.

[Julie Scott]

All you have to do is agree to something that you would never do.

[Kena Whitworth]

Farmer's Market.

[Julie Scott]

Oh boy, would I.

[Kena Whitworth]

My buddy dies, I show up to the funeral, open casket.

[Julie Scott]

You told me he was dead. I believed you.

[Kena Whitworth]

Bill Burr, Drop Dead Years is now streaming on Hulu with T Mobile. No trendspotter has to deal with Trendspotty service because T Mobile helps keep you connected from big cities to your hometown on America's largest 5G network. Switch now. Keep your phone and T Mobile will pay it off up to $800 per line via prepaid card. Visit your local T Mobile location or learn more@t mobile.com keepandswitch. Up to 4 lines via virtual prepaid card. Allowed 15 days qualifying unlock device, credit service report in 90 days device and eligible carrier and timely redemption required. Card has no cash access and expires in six.