
Loading summary
Ann Marie Green
Hello listeners. Today we are sharing an episode of our new 48 Hours series, Case by Case. Each week, the 48 Hours team breaks down the biggest true crime stories unfolding right now. In this episode, we explore the latest development in the Alec Murdoch case, a story that the 48 Hours team has covered extensively over the years. For more deep dives into cases like these, subscribe to Case by Case wherever you get your podcasts.
Quince Advertiser
I've been trying to make my everyday style feel a bit more effortless lately, just focusing on pieces that are easy to reach for, easy to style, and don't require a lot of thinking in the morning. If you're like me, you might consider Quince as your new go to. Everything has that clean, understated design that makes it simple to build an outfit without overcomplicating it. The pieces are versatile enough that they can move between different settings, which makes it easier to rely on a smaller set of staples that still feel fresh. Their basics can take the pressure off deciding what to wear. Plus the fabrics are soft and comfortable, and they hold their shape and keep things looking put together throughout the day. You might find yourself picking up a few items, expecting them to just be simple additions, but they could end up becoming some of the most worn pieces in your rotation. Refresh your everyday with luxury you'll actually use. Head to quince.comcasebycase for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's quince.comcasebycase for free shipping and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too.
Progressive Insurance Advertiser
Quince.comcasebycase Insurance isn't one size fits all, and shopping for it shouldn't feel like squeezing into something that just doesn't fit. That's why drivers have enjoyed Progressive's Name youe Price Tool for years. With the Name youe Price Tool, you tell them what you want to pay and they show you options that fit your budget enough. Hunting for discounts, trying to calculate rates, and tinkering with coverages. Maybe you're picking out your very first policy. Or maybe you're just looking for something that works better for you and your family. Either way, they make it simple to see your options. No guesswork, no surprises. Ready to see how easy and fun shopping for car insurance can be? Visit progressive.com and give the Name your price Tool a try. Take the stress out of shopping and find coverage that fits your life on your terms. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates Price and Coverage Match limited By state law.
Ann Marie Green
I'm 48 Hours correspondent Ann Marie Green. And this is case by case. There was dramatic news this week about one of the most high profile murder cases in years. On Wednesday, the South Carolina Supreme Court Open overturned the 2023 convictions and consecutive life sentences of Alec Murdoch for the murders of his wife Maggie and son Paul in 2021. Now Murdoch, who had been a prominent and wealthy attorney in the state, will be granted a new trial after the court found that his original trial was marred by the, quote, improper influence of Colton County Clerk Rebecca Hill. Hill actually read out the jury's verdict in that original trial. Guilty verdict signed by the four lady. 3, 2, 23. The state supreme Court's unanimous ruling this week found that Rebecca Hill, known as Becky, quote, placed her fingers on the scales of justice by attacking Murdoch's credibility to the jurors. Here's one of those jurors who was asked about Hill at a 2024 hearing.
Juror
Was your verdict influenced in any way by the communications of the clerk of court in this case?
Ann Marie Green
Yes, ma'.
Quince Advertiser
Am.
Juror
And how was it influenced?
Ann Marie Green
To me, it felt like. She made it seem like he was already guilty. But another juror told NBC on Wednesday that she never felt Hill was trying to push an agenda or push her to a certain verdict.
Narrator/Reporter
Maggie and Paul Murdaugh were shot and
Ann Marie Green
killed on the Murdoch family estate. Murdoch testified in his own defense and has continued to maintain his innocence. He did plead guilty to financial crimes. Here to discuss the latest developments in the Murdaugh case is University of South Carolina School of Law Professor Colin Miller. Colin, thanks for joining us.
Colin Miller
Thanks for having me.
Ann Marie Green
So first off, we're gonna start off with just how unusual is this to have a conviction overturned because of the behavior of a clerk at the courthouse?
Colin Miller
It is exceedingly rare. I'm currently working on a wrongful conviction case out of North Carolina. The jury in that case was hung, and while they were hungry, the bailiff for the judge told the jury, the judge in this case doesn't accept a hung jury. And so we're currently appealing. And I looked across the country for cases where comments by a court official led to a conviction being reversed. I only found one case out of Tennessee where the jury was also hung and a bailiff made inappropriate comments to the jury. So this almost never happens across the country.
Ann Marie Green
This is interesting. In response to the ruling, South Carolina's attorney general said that the clerk's conduct was inappropriate, appropriate, but it was ultimately harmless. And some of the jurors sort of spoke about whether or not they were influenced. But what's your take on that my
Colin Miller
take is the focus of the Attorney general was the evidence presented at trial which he was convinced made a compelling case for guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In my mind, the state Supreme Court correctly focused upon the inappropriate nature of. Of a court official telling the jury, watch his demeanor while he testifies. Don't let the prosecution be defeated by kind of the lies of the defense. And so the whole goal of the American criminal justice system is a jury of someone's peers impartially deciding the case. And I think the focus by the court on the inappropriate nature of this was absolutely the correct way to go.
Ann Marie Green
Anyone who's interested in true crime knows about this case. Why do you think so many people are interested in the saga of the Murdochs?
Colin Miller
I think there's two parts of it. One, this is something we used to see historically, we don't see as much now, and that is a very powerful big fish family in a small town here in Colleton county in South Carolina. And they ruled the roost for decades in terms of government, private business, et cetera. And so there's that part of it. And then second, there's this whole family dynamic, this kind of Southern gothic feel, almost out of a William Faulkner novel, where you have all these strange relations and crimes committed by this family. And this question of whether it was a smoke and mirrors attempt by Alec to misdirect from his own crimes to commit these murders. And so all of that, the salacious nature and the power imbalance in this county, I think makes for much watched TV and must listen podcasts.
Ann Marie Green
Absolutely. I think if you were to write the tale of them, you would say it was too unbelievable. Just to remind people he did plead guilty. Alex Murdoch did plead guilty to financial charges. He was charged, there was an array of charges, defrauding victims to the tune of $12 million. So he pled guilty to these financial charges, and that's why he's actually not going to be released, even though this murder conviction had been overturned. He's currently serving concurrent state and federal sentences, 27 and 40 years for those charges. But Murdoch has also maintained that he never killed his wife and he never killed his son. What's important to know before we move forward about where things are right now, what's important to know about the original murder trial in 2023?
Colin Miller
The state would say the most critical piece of evidence was this. Alec Murdaugh claimed at the time of the murders he was with his mother, who I believe is suffering from dementia. Shortly before the murders, the son Paul had done A Snapchat recording. And the prosecution argued to the jury that Alex's voice was on that Snapchat recording at the family compound by the dog kennels where these murders took place. And so for this state, this was the critical piece of evidence showing he lied about his location and in fact, he was at the scene of the crime shortly before the murders.
Ann Marie Green
Right. And that's. The defense argues that that's actually pretty weak. And I don't think they ever found the murder weapon or anything, anything like that. And so the defense does appeal. And what they claim is that the county clerk of court tampered with the jury. What I should ask you is, of course, what does the county clerk do?
Colin Miller
Yeah, the county clerk, they're kind of the command center of the courtroom. They are managing what's going on. Subpoenas being sent out so witnesses can appear, reading the verdict, which Becky Hill did in this case, managing the juries, doing all of the administrative duties that help the courtroom run.
Ann Marie Green
So in that role, is it conceivable that you would chit chat with the jury? You would have like some sort of casual conversation or is that normally not done at all?
Colin Miller
Normally not done at all. Other than giving them their marching orders. Right. So anything administrative, fair game for communications between the clerk and the jurors. Beyond that, anything having to do with the evidence, the testimony, the parties, strictly forbidden.
Ann Marie Green
Foreign.
Narrator/Reporter
Let's be honest, traditional banking hasn't really changed in a long time. Fees, limits and charges just to use your own money. That's where Chime comes in. Chime is fee free banking that's actually built for you, not the 1%. No overdraft fees, no monthly fees, and access to thousands of fee free ATMs. And it's not just about avoiding fees. It's about getting rewarded. Chime members can benefit from up to $1150 in annual rewards, especially when you set up direct deposit. You can earn 5% cash back on your Chime card in categories like gas or groceries and grow your savings faster with a 3.75 APY. That's nine times the national average. Plus you get perks like travel benefits. Spot me for fee free overdrafts up to $200 and MyPay, which can give you access to up to 4, $500
Ann Marie Green
of your pay early.
Narrator/Reporter
Chime is not just smarter banking. It's the most rewarding way to bank join the millions who are already banking fee free today. Head to chime.comcasebycase that is chime.comcasebycase it only takes a few minutes to sign up.
Chime Advertiser
Chime is a fintech, not a bank. Banking services for MyPay and Chime Card provided by Chime's bank Partners. Optional products and services may have fees or charges. Stated annual percentage yield and cash back for Chime prime only. No minimum balance required. Checking account ranking based on a J.D. power survey published October 20, 2025. For more information on APY rates, MyPay Spot Me and Trav go to Chime.com
Lemonade Pet Insurance Advertiser
disclosures if you're the proud parent of a puppy or kitten, you know you can't pet proof your entire life. There simply isn't a sock drawer high enough or a couch cover thick enough. But you can pet proof your wallet with Lemonade Pet Insurance. Whether it's an unexpected accident or a routine checkup, Lemonade can cover up to 90% of the bill. Plus they can handle claims in as little as two seconds. So before you turn into a complete helicopter pet parent, get a'@lemonade.com pet
Ann Marie Green
so can we talk a little bit about, though, what the clerk is accused of saying? Right. There's like several different instances when Alec Murdoch is going to testify. She says something like, oh, this is going to be epic. Something along those lines. Yeah. And she says, I don't know if she says it to all the jurors, but she says, watch his body language. What? What could she be inferring and why could that be problematic?
Colin Miller
Yeah. And so in addition to the comments you mentioned, another juror said a comment about like, don't let the defense fool you. And so I think in combination with the comments on demeanor and behavior, I think at least some jurors interpreted that to mean his body language is going to show the lies across his forehead and it's gonna show that offense is smoke and mirrors and this is a guilty man trying to prove his innocence to you. And that, according to the defense and the state Supreme Court, likely led to the jury not being impartial and assessing his testimony.
Ann Marie Green
And I think the defense also suggested that Hill, the clerk had an ulterior motive. Right. She was planning on writing a book, which he did.
Colin Miller
Absolutely. And so their claim by the defense is she was incentivized to grease the wheels on a guilty verdict because that would allow her to publish this book, which she did, and profit from it. Of course, she denies this, but that was absolutely the allegation by the defense.
Ann Marie Green
Right. So the defense presented their allegations in September of 2023. At first it looked like it was going to be an uphill battle for the defense. In early 2024, a state judge high bar for evidence that Hill tampered with the jury and then ruled that the defense couldn't prove that anything Hill had done had actually influenced the jury or prejudiced the jury in any way. But then over the course of the next year, a lot came to light about Hill's actions. And this is when we're really learning the details. What did we learn about some of what Hill. Not what she said, but something that she did that really caused her. I guess caused the focus to sort of zoom in on her.
Colin Miller
She inappropriately shared photos connected to the crime, disclosed information that was supposed to remain under seal. And to the point you raised earlier, when this first judge heard the case, this was interesting, actually. The former Chief justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court, Jean Toll. And it was found that she lied during her testimony before Justice Toll regarding how she had handled the evidence when in fact she had improperly leaked this and presented it to the public when it was supposed to remain under seal.
Ann Marie Green
She showed a member of the media, I think. Right. And then lied about it. So then, then there's perjury as well. She eventually pleaded guilty to those charges. The charges obstruction of justice and perjury for lying, as well as two counts of misconduct in office and taking bon and promoting through her public office a book that she wrote on the trial. All of these charges were felonies. She did plead guilty. She apologized for her behavior. We should also tell listeners what happened with this book. Becky Hill apparently said in kind of a casual conversation to somebody in the courthouse that she hopes that there's a guilty verdict. Cause it would be really good for her book sales. So she did write the book. It's called behind the Doors of justice, the Murdoch Murders. But she was hoping to maybe use the proceeds to buy a lake house. She said probably not going to happen. Becky Hill's book was pulled from publication after her co author discovered that she actually plagiarized portions of the text. Have you come across many clerks who've written books about the trials they have worked?
Colin Miller
Never. There's been a few judges who have handled high profile cases who have written about it. I have never heard of a bailiff for a clerk of court doing so.
Ann Marie Green
It's not a good look for the clerk. But it doesn't necessarily prove that she tampered with the jury, Right? Correct. There was a hearing earlier this year. I want to play some of what they argued. This is Murdaugh's defense attorney. His name is Dick Harpoutlian, so this
Dick Harpootlian
matter we're discussing this morning, a fair trial, a jury not poisoned by outside influences, I would submit to you, is 51 years ago, as I stood there, I did not realize what I was swearing to do, but I do today, and that is to defend Alec Murdaugh's right to a fair trial. And I've got to admit, in the 51 years since then, I've never seen a factual pattern like this where the clerk of court, where the clerk of court sets out to influence the verdict to get a guilty verdict for financial gain.
Ann Marie Green
So, Colin, I think the last line there, you know, where he says, you know, a clerk of court sets out to influence the verdict to get a guilty verdict for financial gain is kind of like the crux of their argument. She did this for the money. She did this to sell a book. But there needs to be proof that the jury was actually influenced. It's one thing I think, to have loose talk, but it's another thing for the jury to say that affected the outcome of the case, which I think is a little harder to prove. But then this week, the Supreme Court handed down its unanimous ruling overturning the convictions. What did the Supreme Court find?
Colin Miller
Yeah, and this is critical to the point you just raised, which is to say Justice Toll found the defense had not proven the comments by Becky Hill influenced the jury, the state Supreme Court, and they correctly applied Supreme Court precedent. They found if a court official makes inappropriate comments to the jury, our baseline presumption is that that improperly influenced the jury and facilitated a guilty verdict. And it is up to the state to rebut that presumption and prove it didn't influence the jury. And so by shifting that presumption pursuant to precedent, I think the state Supreme Court correctly found that presumption was not rebutted. And we have every reason to believe this had influence in the jury.
KFC Advertiser
Folks knew the colonel approved of his new honey chili crisp and jalapeno ranch sauces the moment he tasted them and said, that's right. No notes, just absolute silence. Turns out some flavors don't need explaining, they just need dipping. It's saucy season at KFC with new honey chili crisp and jalapeno Ranch. Get dipping with a boneless bucket today.
Colin Miller
Prices and participation vary.
Ryan Reynolds (Mint Mobile Advertiser)
Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same Premium Wireless for $15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistants assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do@mintmobile.com
Shopify Advertiser
Switch upfront payment of $45 for 3 month plan equivalent to $15 per month Required intro rate first 3 months only then full price plan options available. Taxes and FE. See full terms@mintmobile.com Starting a business can
seem like a daunting task unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business. From designing a website to marketing to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything you need. There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into sign up for your $1 per month trial@shopify.com specialoffer
Ann Marie Green
so then there's another layer as well, right? In addition to the findings about how the clerk of court allegedly tried to influence the jury, the justices also came to some conclusions about the original judge in the trial and whether or not that judge had allowed a fair trial. Can you tell us more about that ruling?
Colin Miller
So what we had here, as you noted earlier, was a litany of financial crimes that Alec Murdoch committed. He fell behind accrued debts and stole money from his clients. And the state's theory was because he had fallen into debt and committed these crimes, these killings were kind of a Wizard of Oz scenario. Don't look behind the curtain. Shifting the attention somewhere else. And at trial, the judge openly allowed very detailed evidence about all these financial crimes to come in. And the theory was, we're not proving that Alec Murdoch is a bad guy. We're showing the motive for the killings in this case. And the state Supreme Court unanimously said, look, we're reversing based upon the comments by Becky Hill, but for the retrial, at a minimum, you should limit that character evidence. And some of the justices even said it shouldn't come in at all.
Juror
Mm.
Ann Marie Green
So then what happens? Now we're talking about a retrial. All the way back to square one. I suppose if there's evidence, all new evidence can come up, whether it's for the prosecution side or the defense's side.
Colin Miller
Absolutely. And it's interesting because if we look to the first trial, the defense was all about telling the jury there's an absence of evidence of guilt. You noted earlier the firearms weren't found. It was all about saying we can't prove Alec Murdoch's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt if in fact they do have evidence of an alternate suspect or affirmative evidence of innocence, that could be a game changer. But of course, they're keeping it close to the vest, and we're not sure whether they're just posturing or whether they actually have something.
Ann Marie Green
Yeah, they certainly spoke like they were enthusiastically looking forward to a retrial, like
Colin Miller
any good defense attorney would do.
Ann Marie Green
But, I mean, to go back now and start all over again, it has to be a challenge for the prosecution. Or is it more of a challenge for the defense?
Colin Miller
From my research, it's more of a challenge to the defense. I published an article a couple years ago called Standby Judges in the Florida State Law Review, and I did extensive research on what happens when there is a reversal and we have a retrial. And. And it's interesting because going into a first trial, the defense actually knows a lot more about the prosecution case than the prosecution knows about the defense case. And so the studies and the numbers I've seen all show the prosecution tends to fare better on a retrial than the defense. There are some advantages to the defense, but overall, prosecution is the major beneficiary.
Ann Marie Green
So in this case, though, we're talking about an incredibly high profile case. How difficult is it going to be to hold a new trial with a jury that has not seen or heard anything about this case? I mean, it's been everywhere. It's sort of a cottage industry talking about it. There have been countless podcasts, documentaries, even scripted drama.
Colin Miller
Yeah. And so two things have been discussed. One is actually shipping in jurors from out of Colleton county into that county to hear the case. And the second is transferring the case out of Colleton county to another area in South Carolina. But beyond that, to your question, and there's a lot of controversy around this, The Supreme Court has said we don't require ignorance by jurors coming into a trial. Generally, if jurors say, I've heard some things about this case, but I can set aside what I've heard and decide the case solely based upon the evidence in the courtroom. Usually we take the jurors at their word. In this case, given the publicity you mentioned, that might be more difficult to accept than in most cases.
Ann Marie Green
I mean, as you look at how this continues to unfold, I mean, what is the lesson to be learned here?
Colin Miller
The lesson to be learned here, I think, is I would like to say this is the exception rather than the rule. The overwhelming majority of court officials take their job seriously. They're not seeking financial gain, and they are dutifully performing in a way we expect them to do so. Unfortunately, in this case, we had a rogue clerk of court and perhaps based upon wanting financial gain, she took matters into her own hands and she made comments that arguably led to the jury being influenced. And so I think this speaks both to the respect we have for court officials as well as thankfully seeing the system correct itself when we had a rogue clerk acting improperly.
Ann Marie Green
So there's a really strong likelihood, Colin, that I will be talking to you again about the Murdoch case because we could be looking at a retrial in our future. Thank you so much for your insight and thank you everyone else for listening.
Colin Miller
Thanks so much.
Ann Marie Green
And you can follow case by case wherever you get your podcasts and be sure to tell us what cases you are following.
Survivor 50 Narrator
The greatest to ever play the game return to finish what they started.
Colin Miller
Welcome to Survivor 50. I wanted one more shot to play the game that I fell in love with 25 years ago.
Ann Marie Green
I want to win against the best of the best.
Colin Miller
I chickened out at the final tribal.
Ann Marie Green
Season 50. It's an honor.
Survivor 50 Narrator
Light your torch.
Ann Marie Green
I've got some unfinished business.
Survivor 50 Narrator
Be part of history.
Juror
I have more to play for this
Colin Miller
time bigger than ever.
Survivor 50 Narrator
Survivor 50 new CBS Wednesday at 8, 7 Central and streaming on Paramount.
Ann Marie Green
The first time I remember my dad killing somebody was probably four years old.
Paramount Documentary Narrator
A new Paramount original documentary.
Colin Miller
He was like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide. There's no question in my mind that Don was a killer.
Paramount Documentary Narrator
One family. He was the personification of evil divided by the truth.
Ann Marie Green
I came to defend my family. I'm not lying. There's bodies up there. You can scour every inch of those grounds. There is nothing there. Let's dig it.
Paramount Documentary Narrator
My killer father. The Green Hollow murders. Streaming now on Paramount plus.
Original air date: May 16, 2026
Host: Ann Marie Green (CBS News)
Guest: Professor Colin Miller (University of South Carolina School of Law)
This episode of 48 Hours: Case by Case investigates the bombshell development that overturned Alex Murdaugh's double murder convictions, focusing especially on the unprecedented role played by Colleton County Clerk Rebecca “Becky” Hill. Through expert legal analysis and firsthand juror accounts, the episode explores the rare judicial decision, the mechanisms of potential jury tampering, the uniqueness of the Murdaugh scandal, and what lies ahead for the high-profile retrial.
| Timestamp | Segment / Discussion Summary | |-----------|------------------------------------------------| | 02:31 | Introduction to overturned verdict, reasons | | 03:47 | Juror confirms being influenced by clerk | | 04:36 | Colin Miller on rarity of such reversals | | 06:33 | Why public is obsessed with the Murdaugh case | | 12:13 | Specific clerk comments and why problematic | | 15:08 | Hill’s misconduct, including book scandal | | 16:40 | Defense attorney Harpootlian's argument | | 18:06 | Supreme Court’s legal framework for reversal | | 20:53 | Character evidence and its future in retrial | | 22:11 | Retrial strategies and challenges | | 23:00 | Prosecution’s edge in retrials | | 24:56 | Lessons learned; system correcting itself |
This episode expertly documents the extraordinary judicial decision to overturn Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions on the grounds of jury tampering by a courtroom clerk—an almost unheard-of circumstance. Through detailed legal analysis, direct testimony, and discussion of the wider context, 48 Hours illustrates not only the twists of the Murdaugh saga but also the high stakes of courtroom integrity and the mechanics of justice correcting itself—even against the odds. The retrial promises new challenges and, as host Ann Marie Green notes, is almost certain to draw further national attention.