Post Mortem | Deputy Spivey on Trial

Summary

48 Hours: Post Mortem | Deputy Spivey on Trial – Detailed Summary

Episode Overview: The "Post Mortem" episode of "48 Hours," titled "Deputy Spivey on Trial," delves into the intricate case of Renard Spivey, a former sheriff's deputy and TV bailiff, who was charged with the murder of his wife, Patricia Spivey, in 2019. Hosted by Anne Marie Green, the episode features insights from CBS News correspondent Natalie Morales and "48 Hours" producer Asena Bashak. Released on January 14, 2025, the episode provides a comprehensive examination of the evidence, courtroom dynamics, and the profound impact on the families involved.

---

1. Background of the Case

Renard Spivey, a respected former sheriff's deputy known for his role as a bailiff on television, was accused of murdering his wife, Patricia, in their jointly built home. The incident occurred in 2019, leading to a highly publicized trial that ultimately resulted in Renard's acquittal.

Key Points:

• Relationship Tensions: Evidence suggested underlying tensions between Renard and Patricia, with testimonies indicating relationship strain.
• Legal Proceedings: The case faced significant delays, notably due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which interrupted the legal process for four years.

---

2. Surveillance Footage and Evidence

A critical aspect of the case was the extensive security camera footage from inside the Spivey home, particularly from the kitchen area.

Key Insights:

• Unseen Incident: The footage captured auditory evidence of the shooting but did not visually depict the event, leaving much to interpretation.
• Placement of Cameras: The camera above the refrigerator was strategically placed to monitor Patricia's father, who lived with them and suffered from dementia. This placement inadvertently provided crucial evidence for the case.

Notable Quote:

• Natalie Morales at [05:45]: "We know when things happen because you even hear the shots based on that security footage. But what we don't know is how that happened and who really had their finger on the trigger in those moments."

---

3. The Firearm and Technical Challenges

The gun used in the incident was a Smith & Wesson service weapon without a typical safety mechanism, raising questions about its design and operation.

Key Points:

• DNA Evidence: The trigger was never swabbed for DNA, a significant oversight that could have identified who was holding the gun during the shooting.
• Gun Design Flaws: The absence of a safety mechanism meant the gun could discharge unintentionally, a factor emphasized by Renard's defense.

Notable Quote:

• Asena Bashak at [13:53]: "Dick DeGuerin, who was Renard Spivey's attorney, told us that a crime scene technician at trial acknowledged that the trigger was not swabbed for DNA because she was afraid that it would go off again."

---

4. Witness Testimonies and Credibility

Several testimonies played pivotal roles in shaping the narrative of the case.

Key Insights:

• Ezra's Testimony: Patricia's friend, Ezra, testified about multiple phone conversations where Renard admitted to taking steroids and discussed marital strains, including Patricia's desire for a divorce.
• Lack of Phone Records: The prosecution failed to produce phone records to corroborate Ezra's statements, weakening their case.

Notable Quote:

• Natalie Morales at [18:12]: "Ezra did testify under oath to those phone calls. The phone calls were listed on the arrest warrants with times, and the state based a lot of their case on Ezra's statements."

---

5. The Trial and Acquittal

After thorough deliberation, the jury found Renard Spivey not guilty, marking a rare and surprising outcome for "48 Hours."

Key Points:

• Reasonable Doubt: The prosecution was unable to conclusively prove Renard's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, primarily due to insufficient evidence.
• Defense Arguments: The defense successfully presented self-defense and accidental shooting theories, leveraging the gun's design flaws and the lack of definitive evidence pointing to Renard as the aggressor.

Notable Quote:

• Asena Bashak at [21:26]: "Lisa Andrews told us the defense in the end had two good arguments for the jurors, and those were self-defense and accidental shooting."

---

6. Impact on the Families

The resolution of the case had profound emotional repercussions for both Patricia's and Renard's families.

Key Insights:

• Patricia's Family: Patricia's daughter, Petrina, expressed mixed emotions, feeling both cathartic and devastated by the acquittal. The family continues to grapple with Patricia's loss and the legal outcome.
• Renard's Family: Renard's twin sister, Renee, highlighted the absence of winners in the tragedy, emphasizing the lifelong impact on Bernard (Renard) and Patricia's family.

Notable Quote:

• Natalie Morales at [23:05]: "Petrina said she was numb for such a long time. And she said, I was numb for such a long time. And I think that breakthrough for her did come through."

---

7. Life After the Trial

Both Renard and Patricia's family members are striving to rebuild their lives post-trial.

Key Points:

• Renard's Rehabilitation: Despite the acquittal, Renard remains burdened by the incident. He engages in community service through "Hoodies of Healing," volunteering to support the homeless, and is attempting to revive his acting career.
• Emotional Healing: Patricia's family, particularly her daughter Petrina, is beginning to find solace through interviews and sharing their experiences, though the path to healing remains challenging.

Notable Quote:

• Natalie Morales at [24:54]: "Renard is trying to turn what was a horrible tragedy now into doing positive work, and he's volunteering most weekends for an organization that is near and dear to him called Hoodies of Healing."

---

8. Reflections and Conclusions

The episode underscores the complexities of the legal system, the challenges of interpreting limited evidence, and the enduring emotional scars of such tragedies.

Key Insights:

• Justice and Doubt: The case exemplifies how reasonable doubt can lead to unexpected verdicts, leaving families in unresolved grief.
• Gun Safety and Training: The incident raises important discussions about firearm safety, especially concerning designs that lack essential safety features, and the responsibilities of trained law enforcement officers in high-stress situations.

Notable Quote:

• Natalie Morales at [22:07]: "You would think his training as a law enforcement officer would help him de-escalate the situation, but in this case, it unfortunately led to a tragic outcome."

---

Final Thoughts

"Deputy Spivey on Trial" offers a nuanced exploration of a case marked by ambiguity, emotional turmoil, and the quest for truth. Through meticulous reporting and empathetic storytelling, "48 Hours" provides listeners with a comprehensive understanding of the events, the legal intricacies, and the human stories intertwined within this somber narrative.

---

Additional Information: For those interested in exploring further, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to "48 Hours+" on Apple Podcasts for ad-free access and to revisit classic episodes available every Thursday.

Transcript

[Wondery Ad]

Wondery subscribers can listen to this podcast ad free right now. Join Wonder plus in the Wondery app today.

[Babbel Ad]

Planning any exciting trips this year? I bet something you might not be planning is learning the local language. Well, with Babbel. You only need a few weeks to learn. This year. Speak like a whole new you with Babbel, the language learning app that gets you talking. Babbel's quick 10 minute lessons, handcrafted by over 200 language experts, get you to begin speaking your new language in three weeks or whatever pace you choose. And because conversing is the key to really understanding each other in new languages, Babbel is designed using practical real world conversations. Let's get more of you talking in a new language. Babbel is gifting our listeners 60% off [e-mail] TrueCrime get up to 60% [e-mail] Truecrime spelled B A B B E L.com TrueCrime Babbel.com TrueCrime rules and restrictions.

[Fine Mortuary College Ad]

May apply if you've ever considered a career as a licensed funeral director, Fine Mortuary College's online associate degree program can be completed in just two years. Fine Mortuary College provides an inclusive, engaging and innovative educational experience that challenges and prepares tomorrow's funeral service professionals. Being a funeral director is about human services helping people, specifically helping the living as they navigate the grieving process. The curriculum focuses on all aspects of funeral service, including the psychology, science and business requirements of the profession. To attend a virtual open house, please visit their website at www.fmc.edu an RSVP for the date that best fits your schedule. That's www.fmc.edu. use promo code Wondery so you want.

[Wondery Ad]

To be a marketer? It's easy. You just have to score a ton of leads and figure out a way to turn them all into customers. Plus manage a dozen channels, write a million blogs and launch 100 campaigns all at once. When that's done, simply make your socials go viral and bring in record profits. No sweat. Okay, fine, it's a lot of Sweat. But with HubSpot's AI powered marketing tools, launching benchmark breaking campaigns is easier than ever. Get [e-mail] marketers.

[Ann Marie Green]

Welcome back to Postmortem. I'm your host Ann Marie Green, and today we are discussing the case of Patricia Spivey, whose husband, Renard is a former sheriff's deputy. He was also known for playing a bailiff on TV. He was charged in 2019 with murdering Patricia in The home that they built together. So joining me now is CBS News correspondent Natalie Morales and 48 Hours producer Asena Bashak. Welcome.

[Natalie Morales]

Thank you. Anne Marie, good to be with you.

[Asena Bashak]

Thanks for having us.

[Ann Marie Green]

So I should point out to everyone that we're actually recording this at a pretty high stress time for you, Natalie. There are several wildfires burning out of control in the Los Angeles area and not too far from where you are, Natalie. Yes.

[Natalie Morales]

And we're just a couple of towns over from the Palisades fire. And all around me, a lot of people have lost a lot. So my thoughts are with them. If you know, there are also some technical difficulties as well in recording this because with winds the way we've had them for the last couple days, if I freeze every now and again, I apologize. Right.

[Ann Marie Green]

And you might hear the dogs barking in the background.

[Natalie Morales]

And the dogs barking because there are a lot of people in the neighborhood making sure things are okay.

[Ann Marie Green]

Well, we're glad you're safe, and let's cross our fingers that this gets under control and everyone else remains safe as well.

[Natalie Morales]

Thank you.

[Ann Marie Green]

Just a reminder for everyone. You know, I say this every time. If you have not watched the episode yet, this episode of 48 Hours, you can find the full audio version of it just below this episode in your podcast feed. So go take a listen to it and then come on back and we will talk. All right. What I think was really interesting about this episode is just how much security video you had from inside the home. I've always wondered who these people are that just run security cameras in their home all the time, in the kitchen, of all places. So because of this, we can actually hear the shooting, but we don't see the shooting. Patricia's family, they believe that she was murdered, but Bernard said that it was an accident. Was it a challenge for you all to make sure that you presented both sides of this story?

[Natalie Morales]

That's our job to do that, to present both sides of the story. I think what the challenge was for the authorities was to figure out who the real aggressor was in this situation. Who had the finger on the trigger when the gun went off. And that camera, by the way, right over the refrigerator, that's because Patricia Spivey's father was living with them and he has onset dementia. So therefore, they always had the camera rolling just to keep track. His room was not far off from the kitchen, so that's why that camera was specifically placed there. But that footage gave us sort of a window into the moments leading up to what happened. That night. And again, it comes down to we know when things happen because you even hear the shots based on that security footage. But what we don't know is how that happened and who really had their finger on the trigger in those moments.

[Asena Bashak]

There's another interesting fact about this case. So apparently in Texas, if you're acquitted of a crime, your complete record can be expunged. Once Renard was acquitted, he did ask for that. So we didn't really have any access to court transcripts, court testimony, which we usually do to do these kind of programs. So that was a big challenge for us.

[Ann Marie Green]

And so you guys really studied the surveillance footage really closely. I know what sort of struck me, which has nothing necessarily to do with the case, was just how ordinary it seemed like the hours leading up to this were, you know, going to the fridge, grabbing a drink, just it's like very ordinary. What was unusual about the footage leading up to the shooting?

[Natalie Morales]

Well, you know what Renard told us, because he did agree to an interview, you know, after he was acquitted, um, he thought that night there had been some tension building in the relationship. And also on that security footage, you can hear, it sounds like at one point where Patricia, before she went to bed, you hear in the background, Patricia said over and over again, as if she's upset with him about something, but we don't know what exactly. And so in that time, something happened. Renard said he picked up her phone after she went to bed from her bed stand, went to the closet, looked at the phone, and that's when she confronted him, he says, with the gun at the front of the closet. And that's when he got very nervous because he knew it was fully charged and it doesn't have a safety mechanism on it, and if the finger is on the trigger, it can go off. So that's when he said he tussled with her to get control of the gun and the shots went off.

[Ann Marie Green]

But this is one of my. The challenge that I had with his story is that it just seemed like there wasn't a lot of time. We see him go out to the kitchen to say goodnight to her. Then he, according to him, he's sort of rebuffed, and he goes back in and he says he waited for her to fall asleep. It just didn't seem like enough time had gone by.

[Asena Bashak]

Yes. So we hear Patricia at 3:01am when she says it's the same thing over and over again. So there's something going on, like Natalie said, between them. And then 3:07 is when the gunshots are heard. So there's only six minutes from when we hear Patricia saying it's the same thing over and over again to the gunshots. So the prosecutors at trial raised this by saying, you're having a fight with your husband, and in six minutes, you're able to sleep. That doesn't sound believable.

[Ann Marie Green]

Right. You can see why that would raise a little bit of suspicion. And then the surveillance cameras, they also catch moments after the shooting, when Renard has called 911. We see him take a break from CPR to unlock the garage door. I want to play a clip of that 911 call. It wasn't part of the show, so this is new for people. When the operator hears his home security system disarming.

[Natalie Morales]

Are you in the bedroom?

[Ann Marie Green]

Yeah.

[Megan]

Sister disarmed.

[Natalie Morales]

Ready to arm.

[Ann Marie Green]

Entry door.

[Asena Bashak]

Sir, we need to get back to.

[Natalie Morales]

Your wife to continue the compressions. All right, ma'am.

[Asena Bashak]

Just.

[Ann Marie Green]

I mean, did he explain that?

[Natalie Morales]

So, Ann Marie. Yes. The operator is asking on the 911 call if he is in the bedroom, but he replies with yes, even though we see in the security footage from their kitchen that he is now walking to the garage. And he said it was to open the door for the first responders. So he's now removed himself from. From doing CPR on Patricia at that moment. And he didn't tell the operator that at the time, you know, and. And. And it's important to remember he himself had been shot in the leg. So we know that. That at that point there was some trauma. And so he is giving her cpr. And he said he felt he needed to go open the garage door to allow the first responders to enter. So that's how he explained it to us. He was like, I. I did what I thought I needed to do to best get the help that she would need.

[Ann Marie Green]

Yeah, that makes sense why he would be sort of groaning as much as he is because he's shot in the leg and now he's trying to walk, you know, to the garage. Um, this is what I'll say. I kind of went back and forth, and part of the reason why I went back and forth is because I actually found him very believable. Have you interviewed people who've been accused of murder before? And was he sort of any different or the same or what jumped out at you guys?

[Natalie Morales]

He genuinely seems to carry the burden of what happened on that night. And, you know, that he feels her loss. I mean, he says to this day, he still loves Patricia very deeply. And I think what you know is most troubling for him is knowing that it was his gun that was charged and on the nightstand that ultimately led to this tragic death. He did want to talk. He wanted to tell us his side of the story and he wanted to, you know, I guess somewhat clear his name because with a lot of these cases, this happened right before COVID and Covid interrupted the legal process. So this case was put on hold for four years. So in the public eye, he was looked at perhaps as being guilty, even though he hadn't had his day in court yet. And he was eventually acquitted.

[Asena Bashak]

I mean, it's a complicated case. Consultant Lisa Andrews told us. She was a former prosecutor in Texas and she did tell us that there, there was just not enough evidence clearly pointing to either side.

[Megan]

Hotels.com knows that planning your book club's annual field trip can get chaotic. Rhea, the romance reader, wants to stay in Prince Charming's castle. Self improvement. Steve needs a hotel gym. Leila and Jeff, the horror fans, ghosted the group chat about budget. And you've read enough true crime to know that murdering them isn't a real option. With the Hotels.com app, invite all your friends to collaborate and find the perfect hotel together. Share properties, vote on your favorites and book all in one place. Find your Perfect somewhere with hotels.com Megan.

[Tiffany Reiss]

Stoner was a young, passionate Republican and a self proclaimed advocate for mental health. But behind her public Persona lurked a master of deception. I'm Tiffany Reiss, host of Something Was wrong in season 22. We're diving into the twisted world of a con artist who's been allegedly scamming and making false claims for over a decade. From the US To Canada, Megan Stoner has left a trail of devastation for her victims. But after a brief period of incarceration, she's now back out on the streets. And although she's free now, we're actively working with law enforcement to further justice for the victims of her alleged crimes. This isn't just another true crime story. It's a wake up call about trust, deception and the power of community to fight back. Follow Something Was Wrong on the Wondery app or wherever you get your podcasts. You can binge all episodes of Something was wrong season 22ad free right now by joining Wondery.

[Ann Marie Green]

Welcome back. Let us dig into some of the evidence in this case, the trigger of the gun that was used to fatally shoot Patricia. It was never swabbed for DNA. Why not?

[Asena Bashak]

Dick DeGuerin, who was Reynard Spivey's attorney, told us That a crime scene technician at trial acknowledged that the trigger was not swapped for DNA because she was afraid that it would go off again. Now, Dick made a point that shows how dangerous this gun is. He also said the DNA swabbing was a bit sloppy, meaning the investigators used only one swab to swab the gun, but they didn't specifically swab the trigger. And when they used one swab to swab the gun, two DNAs came up, which was Patricia and Renard's DNA.

[Natalie Morales]

It seems like a basic necessity when it comes to figuring out whose finger was on the trigger. But it was his former service weapon. It was always right by the bed charged, which in itself is the problem here. You know, this was a Smith and Wesson service gun, and the design of it, it doesn't have a typical safety mechanism. And defense attorney Dick DeGuerin showed us how it could go off over and over again because it automatically recharges, which, you know, is so scary when you think about that. But again, we don't know. The defense argued that the state never proved whose hand, again, was on the trigger. So that really came down to being crucial at trial and presented reasonable doubt for the jury.

[Ann Marie Green]

Yeah, I can definitely see that. So it was still unclear the amount of times that Patricia was shot, which I thought was surprising.

[Natalie Morales]

Right. We poured over the medical examiner's report with CBS News consultant Lisa Andrews. She looked it all over for us. That was key to this case. And the medical examiner's report ruled it was a homicide. But what was unclear was the number of, you know, entry and exit wounds. They couldn't determine the amount of shots fired. Was it two shots? Was it three shots?

[Asena Bashak]

So Renard told us that he was shot first in the leg. The second shot, according to Renard, hit Patricia in on the left side of her chest. And then the third shot would have gone through her arm, exiting her arm and going into her right torso. But the medical examiner can't tell us the order of the shots, so we need to go by accounts of people.

[Natalie Morales]

Dick DeGuerin showed us with the actual weapon, that Smith and Wesson revolver. He reenacted what Renard told him happened on that night and the trajectory of the bullets. He kind of did this whole demonstration with me, showing how they fought over the gun, how he was holding her arm, and the way the trajectory of the bullet would have entered her arm, into her side and then hit her chest. Also, the defense said the number of shots really didn't disprove that it was an accident. Given that this is A gun that is charged and can continually be fired and keep going. The prosecution, though, was arguing that it's hard to believe that multiple shots are fired, that it is an accident. One more thing, though. What was interesting you mentioned in the Hour is there was a fourth sound as well on the surveillance footage. It was unclear if it was another shot. The question, according to the state, was could it have possibly been Renard shooting his leg at that time, a fourth shot, but there was no proof of that. And the sound was so indistinct.

[Asena Bashak]

Their theory was that he was in a different part of the house. That's why the sound is different. But we'll never know. The state couldn't prove that was a gunshot.

[Ann Marie Green]

So I want to talk about another person you interviewed. Patricia's friend, Ezra. He took the stand, had pretty damning testimony about their relationship. But also Renard. He told you in an interview that he had multiple phone conversations with Renard in the hours before the shooting, and that Renard admitted to taking steroids and said that Patricia wanted a divorce. But at trial, the prosecutor did not present phone records to prove this. How did Ezra's testimony hold up at trial?

[Asena Bashak]

Yeah, he did testify under oath to those phone calls. The phone calls were listed on the arrest warrants with Times, and the state based a lot of their case on Ezra's statements, and I think that was a big factor in the case. During those conversations, Ezra tells Renard to get out of the house if things are that tense. And Renard says, I'm gonna show her she's not getting the house. This is all based on statements from Ezra. So the prosecution's motive was the house, but they just couldn't show the phone records at trial. The phone calls were made over apps, and they told us that they don't have the records. We found this out on location when we were interviewing renard and Dick DeGuerin. And I spent hours on the phone with Ezra prior to that. And I was surprised, and I was taken aback when I. When I heard that this was news to me. So I arranged another meeting with Ezra. And I asked him, I said, were you truthful about these phone calls? And he said, yes, I was truthful. I did not lie. I wanted to tell them everything Renard told me that evening leading up to the shooting. Um, so he told me he was telling the truth.

[Ann Marie Green]

So Ezra was the only one that I am aware of that spoke about steroid use. But when you talked to her cousin and to her daughter, did they also indicate that, you know, there were Problems in the relationship to this degree.

[Natalie Morales]

The daughter talked about how Renard seemed to be controlling. Also, Patricia's cousin, Cybill shepherd, who she was very close with, talked about Renard's alleged controlling behavior. Patricia had this annual cruise that she would do with Cybill, and after a time, Cybil said it became increasingly more difficult because Renard was always checking on them and just controlling and not letting them have their fun. And Renard denied that. You know, he said, I let her go on the cruise. I let her. You know, she went on multiple cruises after we got married. So he denied any controlling behavior. Also, in regards to the steroid use, I asked Renard point blank, were you using steroids or were you using anything that altered your moods? We hear so much about roid rage. And he said he went to a doctor to treat low testosterone. He was prescribed pills and shots that he wasn't on steroids. So he denied that.

[Ann Marie Green]

The jury deliberated for 12 hours over two days. Crown Renard Spivey, not guilty. Well, it certainly surprised me. Only because it doesn't often happen on 48 hours. Do you expect that viewers were also surprised?

[Natalie Morales]

Usually there's a more clear cut finish or ending to the story. In this case, he was acquitted. And I think the reason is because, again, jurors found reasonable doubt. Consultant Lisa Andrews again told us this all came down to the prosecution not proving their case in court. They didn't have enough evidence, and, you know, the jury paid attention. They, they did their jobs. They, they couldn't connect the dots in this case.

[Asena Bashak]

Lisa Andrews told us the defense in the end, had two good arguments for the jurors, and those were self defense and accidental shooting. So if, if somebody had a doubt about accidental shooting, self defense was another explanation that Dick DeGuerin and Michael DeGuerin presented in court. And Dick was able that there's no safety on the trigger, so it's really easy to fire this gun.

[Ann Marie Green]

I mean, I thought to myself, I'm gonna take a look at how many other cases this particular type of gun is involved in, because it seems like a particularly dangerous design if you're trained. And he, he would have been, perhaps you can handle it. But I would think there's a lot of people who can't handle a gun like that.

[Natalie Morales]

Yes. You know, and, and it's interesting. I did, I did ask him too, about that, because his training, you would think, is something that also would kick in, that when you see somebody pointing a gun at you as a officer, you know, law enforcement, you're trained to deescalate the situation. I asked him about that when he said his training kicked in because he saw her finger was right on the trigger, and he knew he had to get the gun out of her fingers because he knew that if there was any sort of pressure on that trigger, it would go off. And, in fact, that's what happened.

[Ann Marie Green]

Wow. So you spoke to Renard's twin sister, Renee, and, you know, she said, there are really no winners at all in this case. Bernard's life will never be the same. Patricia, of course, lost her life. What was it like talking to Patricia's family? And how are they coping, considering not only are they dealing with the loss of Patricia, but also this case did not turn out the way they believed it should have.

[Natalie Morales]

Yeah. You know, it's always heartbreaking when you cover these stories. In this case, though, looking at Patrina, that's Patricia's daughter, and she looks just like her mother. I mean, they look like they could have been sisters. And they had such a close bond, such a close relationship. And Petrina talked about how much hope Patricia had when she married Renard. Renard was her first true love, her first marriage, her first house that they bought together. I mean, she viewed this as sort of her happily ever after. So it's just such a senseless tragedy. And Petrina said she had not cried. And in the middle of doing the interview with us, she started to cry, and she was like, oh, my gosh. Oh, my gosh, I'm crying. I think it was sort of cathartic for her, you know, having the resolution, even though it didn't go the way she thought it would go. She, at least was sort of dealing with the emotions finally.

[Asena Bashak]

And she did say that she was numb. She became numb after the shooting, and she wasn't feeling things the way maybe you would feel things after such a big loss. And she. She said, I was numb for such a long time. And I think that breakthrough for her did come through. When Natalie was talking to her, it was heartbreaking.

[Ann Marie Green]

Well, you know, you always wonder why people are willing to talk to us here at 48 hours, and I hope, in her case, it was therapeutic, that this is the beginning of some sort of journey towards healing for her. But I was quite struck by the fact that she was caught off guard that there were tears.

[Natalie Morales]

Yeah.

[Ann Marie Green]

And then what about Renard? How is Renard doing today?

[Natalie Morales]

Trying to pick up the pieces of his life, too. As we said, he's mourning the loss of Patricia as well. He still says she was the love of his life. He's spending a lot of time with his grandkids, doing a lot with his church within his community. Renard is trying to turn what was a horrible tragedy now into doing positive work, and he's volunteering most weekends for an organization that is near and dear to him called Hoodies of Healing. It's an organization that helps to feed the homeless and so he's very involved with that.

[Asena Bashak]

He's also trying to go back to acting, he told me, really, because he was on a reality show, justice, with Cristina Perez as a bailiff. So he's also, I think, trying to revive his acting career.

[Ann Marie Green]

We'll see what happens. It was a really well told hour. You guys did an excellent job and thanks for joining us.

[Natalie Morales]

Thanks, Anne Marie.

[Asena Bashak]

Thank you.

[Ann Marie Green]

If you like this series postmortem, please rate and review 48 hours on Apple Podcasts and follow 48 hours wherever you get your podcasts. You can also listen ad free on Amazon Music, Wondry plus and the Wondry app or with a 48 hours plus subscription on Apple Podcasts. Thanks again for listening.

[Wondery Ad]

If you like this podcast, you can listen ad free right now by joining Wondery in the Wondery App. Before you go, tell us about yourself by filling out a quick survey at.

[Megan]

Wondery.Com [e-mail], we know some travelers crave sand between their toes, others want to be poolside with a drink on the way. And more often than not, those two people end up in a relationship. With the Hotels.com app, compare properties side by side across amenities like pool and ocean view. Compromise isn't so bad when you're holding a Mai Tai bio pool with an ocean view. Agreeing that yeah, this is better than finding sand in awkward places for three days. Book now in the hotels.com app and find your perfect somewhere.

[Wondery Ad]

Harvard is the oldest and richest university in America, but when a social media fueled fight over Harvard and its new president broke out last fall, that was no protection. Claudine Gay is now gone. We've exposed the DEI regime and there's much more to come. This is the Harvard Plan, a special series from the Boston Globe and WNYC's on the Media. To listen, subscribe to onthemedia wherever you get your podcasts.

[Lindsey Graham]

Hi, I'm Lindsey Graham, the host of Wondery Show American Scandal. We bring to life some of the biggest controversies in US History. Presidential lies, environmental disasters, corporate fraud. In our latest series, NASA embarks on an ambitious program to reinvent space exploration with the launch of its first reusable vehicle, the space shuttle. And in 1985, they announced they're sending teacher Christa McAuliffe into space aboard the space shuttle Challenger, along with six other astronauts. But less than two minutes after liftoff, the Challenger explodes, and in the tragedy's aftermath, investigators uncover a series of preventable failures by NASA and its contractors that led to the disaster. Follow American Scandal on the Wondery app or wherever you get your podcasts. Experience all episodes ad free and be the first to binge the newest season only on Wondery. You can join Wondry in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Start your free trial today.