
How did millions of Americans end up living in neighborhoods where finding fresh food is harder than ever, and why is the problem by design, not accident?
Loading summary
Ad
We know that weeknights are not for the week, but are you going to throw in the kitchen towel and order takeout? No way. You've got Land O' Lakes butter, a skillet and a plan. Land O' Lakes. Eat it like you own it.
Dell
Introducing the new Dell AI PC. Powered by the Intel Core Ultra processor, it helps do your busy work for you so you can fast forward through editing images, designing presentations, generating code, debugging code, summarizing meeting notes, finding files, managing your schedule, responding to Kathy's long, annoying emails, leaving all the time in the world for the things you actually want to do, like texting with Kathy about bad reality TV. Get a new Dell AI PC starting at $699.99@dell.com AI PC how those ahead? Stay ahead.
Chris Berube
This is 99% invisible. I'm Chris Berube, sitting in this week for Roman Mars in Woundsocket, Rhode Island. There's one surefire way to get yourself clocked as an out of towner.
Unknown
Is it Woonsocket?
Gene Michon
Woon. Woonsocket.
Unknown
Woonsocket.
Gene Michon
Yep.
Unknown
No double O, no woo.
Gene Michon
No woo, no woo.
Chris Berube
This past spring, producer Jason De Leon drove to Woonsocket, which is just a few miles up the road from where he lives.
Unknown
And in Woonsocket, I met up with Gene Michonne. Jean is Native American and French Canadian, so technically, her name is Jean.
Gene Michon
God's gift to man. That's what it means.
Ad
Really?
Gene Michon
Yeah. My mother had a sense of humor.
Unknown
Pronunciations aside, everyone calls her Jean. And Jean is third generation Woonsocket. She grew up there in the 1970s, and back then, she said the city had some stuff going for it.
Chris Berube
There were places to hang out, like the local movie theater or the skating rink or the arcade. And because she loved to cook, Jean remembers always jumping at the chance to go with her mom to the grocery store.
Gene Michon
And that was the biggest thing ever.
Lina Khan
Woo.
Gene Michon
Let's go. We're going shopping with mom.
Unknown
Woo hoo.
Gene Michon
Now you're not getting nothing.
Unknown
At the time, Gene's family had a lot of options for grocers. There were small, locally owned stores like Fernandez produce and big Ds. The city also had supermarkets from regional chains like Star Market and Almack's. The way some of these local shops bag groceries always mesmerized young Gene. After ringing them up, a cashier would place the groceries in a box on a giant conveyor belt, which would crank out the side of the building.
Gene Michon
And everybody knew that you park there and then it'll come out to you. You know, dad would wait in the car while Ma and the kids were shopping, throwing whatever in the boxes.
Unknown
As the years went on, Wwensocket's economy took a turn for the worse. For decades, factory jobs had employed a lot of the city. But those jobs left, and pretty soon the local movie theater closed. So did the skating rink and the arcade.
Gene Michon
Then the grocery stores started disappearing. We used to have Star Market, which was always packed on Diamond Hill. And then that one left.
Unknown
One by one, local grocers shut their doors and never reopened. The decline was so dramatic that today in Woonsocket, a city of 45,000, there's only one grocery store, a price right out on the edge of town.
Gene Michon
It's sad that people don't have other choices to make. And I'm not knocking price right, but when you have no choice but to go to one place, it's like that's the oasis in the desert. This is the only spot that they can go to get refreshed is at this price right.
Chris Berube
Woonsocket is what's known as a food desert. These are low income communities where it's hard to find groceries. According to the usda, in a city like Woonsocket, that means lots of residents live more than a mile from the nearest grocery store.
Unknown
And while a mile in a city may not sound like much, according to the latest Census information, nearly 20% of Wunsaksuk socket's residents don't have access to a vehicle. Pair that with unreliable public transportation, and suddenly a simple task like grabbing groceries can become a real struggle.
Chris Berube
On its face, the story of how Wunsocket turned into a food desert seems pretty straightforward. The city fell on hard times, then businesses abandoned ship, and now it's harder to get basic things like groceries.
Unknown
But the actual story of how Woonsocket and places like it became food deserts is more complicated than that.
Ad
The common assumption about why food deserts exist, both in the academic literature and among policymakers, is that these are communities that can't support a supermarket. You know, they're either too poor, too small to generate enough spending on groceries, and therefore can't support a supermarket.
Unknown
Stacy Mitchell is a food researcher and co executive director at the Institute for Local Self Reliance. And she thinks this general understanding of food deserts misses the bigger picture.
Ad
Food deserts didn't used to exist. You know, poverty has been with us forever. But food deserts only arose in the late 1980s. And so this explanation that we have that food deserts are really kind of like there's something wrong with the community, like the community itself is deficient in some way and therefore can't support a supermarket. That's not actually why we have food deserts. Everybody eats. You know, poor neighborhoods spend a lot of money on grocery stores. It's not that there's not enough spending in these neighborhoods, like something else happened.
Unknown
It's easy to think of food deserts as a natural consequence of poverty. But in communities like Woonsocket, grocery stores stuck around well into the 1990s, long after the factory's closed and the city's fortunes faded. Stacey Mitchell says the real reason these food deserts emerged all across the country is because of a decades long battle over one policy. The story of this policy fight starts with the rise of one of America's first national grocery chains, the great Atlantic and Pacific Tea company, better known as amp. We watch our P's and q's at A and P. We know you'll be back for these little green guys. They're our specials of the week.
Chris Berube
A and P started as a tea company in lower Manhattan, but at the turn of the 20th century, the retailer expanded into the grocery business. At the time, the industry was mostly composed of small, independent, independent neighborhood grocers. These mom and pop shops would often take orders by phone and then deliver them to your house. They also operated on a credit system, so instead of settling the bill with every purchase, customers would just pay a tab at the end of the month.
Unknown
However, deliveries can get expensive, and operating on a credit system exposed these grocers to big losses. Sometimes people just didn't pay up. So to cover shortfalls, they'd often mark up their prices. But with the arrival of A and P came a new business model.
Chris Berube
A and P did away with deliveries and purchases on credit. Instead, at your local amp, customers would approach the counter and pay on the spot with cash. They also cut costs by vertically integrating their business. The company owned manufacturing facilities which produced amp branded products which they sold in AP stores, all of which helped them offer the lowest prices in town.
Unknown
Prioritizing low prices is a pretty simple change, but it was existential. For all of those mom and pop shops.
Ad
There's a lot of alarm across the country about ap. You know, they're opening all of these stores, they're putting lots of local grocers out of business and really just taking over the market very rapidly.
Unknown
By the early 1930s, A&P had expanded from grocery stores in the New York metro area to more than 15,000 stores nationwide. While other chain stores existed, A and P perfected the model. Even in places like Woonsocket, A and P had multiple stores throughout the city.
Chris Berube
And with all that growth, A and P achieved something no retailer in America had ever done before. It produced more than a billion dollars in sales.
Unknown
And the company used all this money and power as a weapon in negotiations with suppliers. A and P knew that it had the upper hand. And so the company leveraged its size to not only to get the very best deals, but to make life harder on their competition.
Ad
The reason that AMP is growing so rapidly is that it's squeezing suppliers. It's going to suppliers and saying, we're your biggest customer and we want you to give us big discounts and other favors while raising the prices that you're charging our competitor down the street.
Unknown
This is what's known as the waterbed effect. When suppliers charged AP less for its products, they made up for it by charging more to the small neighborhood grocers. So like a waterbed, if you sit on one side, the other side goes up.
Ad
So, in effect, what drives AP's growth is that it has this kind of leverage that comes purely from its size.
Unknown
In the 1930s, A&P was viewed by many as a monopoly, and its size was a huge issue in the country. The company was known to blacklist suppliers who didn't bend to their will. It also extracted big fees from farmers and manufacturers to carry their products. From the federal government all the way down to high school debate classes, people argued about amp and how big is too big.
Ad
AMP is like changing the fabric of neighborhoods and of towns. You know, it's coming in and running out of business, a lot of local businesses. So there's this big backlash all across the country.
Chris Berube
This pushback against AP was part of a wider movement against chain stores in general. In small towns throughout the Midwest and the south, big chains threatened local businesses. And because A and P was the biggest chain store, it became the target of communities nationwide.
Unknown
Municipal governments try to help small local grocers by taxing, amplifying. Some even passed laws to limit the number of stores it could open in a county. In Shreveport, Louisiana, a local radio station ran a whole program focused on fighting chain stores. A musician named Andrew Jenkins had a message for communities facing a takeover by the likes of Amp.
Chris Berube
Now let us give you warning don't let us plead in vain don't send your money to Wall street and bind.
Unknown
Yourselves with chains so let us all.
Chris Berube
Be kind and true and meet this issue straight and trade with a hometown merchant before it is too late. In the 1930s, the anger with chain stores was also part of a broader frustration with the economy. Many people felt the system just wasn't serving the working class. After all, A and P crossed a billion dollars in sales during the Great Depression. While the low prices helped cash strapped Americans, it was notable that AMP's rise coincided with the lowest point in many people's lives.
Unknown
Soon, Congress picked up on all this outrage. AMP built up its power during an era of relatively lax antitrust enforcement. But as part of FDR's New Deal, corporate power was under intense scrutiny. And with one new piece of legislation, two lawmakers set their sights on breaking up the power of AMP.
Ad
So in 1936, they passed a law called the Robinson Patman Act. And it's an antitrust law, and it outlaws what is known as price discrimination.
Chris Berube
The Robinson Patman act was the brainchild of Senator Joseph Robinson from Arkansas and Congressman Wright Patman from Texas. And it gave the federal government a new tool to rein in monopolistic power. The law was even nicknamed the Anti A and P Act.
Unknown
For years, AMP pressured suppliers into giving them the best deals. But the Robinson Patman act changed that dynamic. It outlawed the price discrimination, which means that whatever sweet deal AP received from a supplier had to be the same sweet deal offered to other retailers, including small independent grocers.
Ad
The law makes it illegal for suppliers to provide different prices to different buyers. It also makes it illegal for retailers that have market power to demand special deals, discounts, other kinds of favorable treatment.
Unknown
One big hangup that people had with the Robinson Patman act is this idea that it banned bulk discounts. But that's not exactly true. Big chains could still get a lower price for buying in bulk. Other retailers just needed access to the same terms. The goal was to make retailers compete over things like innovation, product selection, and customer service. Rather than using purely market power to shove competition out.
Chris Berube
A and P tried to persuade the public that its size wasn't a problem. In a magazine profile, the president of the company warned that breaking up their power would actually raise grocery prices. And in one newspaper ad, A and P thumbed its nose at antitrust enforcers by showing a picture of the Empire State Building, which, with a caption that read, it's far too big. It ought to be seven buildings.
Unknown
Still, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice kept pressuring the company. And after Robinson Patman went into effect, the changes to the grocery business were almost immediate. The law ate into AP's profits, and within a few years, the company's exponential growth looked a lot more like normal growth, the steep decline of the small neighborhood grocer was headed off AP is.
Ad
No longer, you know, sort of aggressively like gobbling up the entire market. They're stopped from doing that, but they're still, you know, a force.
Unknown
The Robinson Patman act didn't destroy amp it just stopped the company from abusing its power. Big chain grocers continued to thrive and operate nationwide and small grocers could still serve their communities. There was a semblance of balance in the grocery business.
Ad
Independent grocers, you know, including single location grocery stores and very small, like family owned chains that had a handful of stores. Those retailers maintain more than half of all grocery sales, you know, from the 1940s all the way through the early 1980s. So from a consumerist perspective, it's like the best of both worlds because almost every neighborhood has this choice. You know, if you want to shop at an independent grocery store, you have that option. But if you prefer to shop at say, Kroger or Safeway, you also have that option. There's this incredible diversity and variety and competition, and it's all really resting on the fact that we had the Robinson Patman act and enforced it for decades.
Unknown
The Robinson Patman act helped create a more level playing field in the grocery business, but it would soon get swept up in a huge campaign to rewrite the rules of American antitrust.
Chris Berube
After the break One man's quest to break the Robinson Patman act and the rise of food deserts.
Dell
Maine where life, the way it should be transforms all who encounter its spectacular landscapes. Rugged coast coastlines, pine scented trails, sandy beaches, sparkling lakes and tranquil forests inspire you to reflect and make meaningful moments. They offer endless opportunities for adventure and exploration. Whether pedaling or paddling, hiking or biking, Maine has more than enough outdoor spaces to make the most of long summer days. Relish in exquisite flavors harvested from the ocean and the rich soils of orchards and fields. Maine's makers are rooted to its heritage while boldly branching into new ways of thinking, doing and being. Connect with its people in warm and authentic towns which beckon you to stroll art galleries and locally owned shops where generations of artists, writers, entrepreneurs and craftspeople see the world anew. It's tempting to do it all when you visit, but take a beat and a breath. Get a feel for the time, time and tempo of Maine. Simple pleasures. Scenic adventures where every route is the scenic one. Discover more at visitmain.com Article makes it effortless to create a stylish, long lasting home at an unbeatable price. Whatever your personal style may be Article offers a curated range of mid century, modern, coastal and Scandi inspired pieces that not only shine on their own, but also pair seamlessly with nearly any other Article product. Their carefully selected collections feature high quality, meaningful pieces that will stand the test of time. There is no filler. Every item is chosen for its craftsmanship, design and lasting value. My house is like an article furniture longitudinal study. I sleep in an article bed my wife Joy works at and we eat at an article dining room table and we sit in article chairs. And it has been this way for years and years and years. All the furniture I've ever gotten from Article is still in service and performing at its peak. Article is offering our listeners $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. To claim, visit article.com 99 and the discount will be automatically applied at checkout. That's article.com 99 for $50 off your first purchase of $100 or more. The moment you realize your business needs to hire someone new, you pretty much have to hire that person like yesterday. So how do you find amazing candidates fast?
Unknown
It's easy.
Dell
Just use Indeed with Indeed Sponsored Jobs, your post jumps to the top of the page for your relevant candidates so you can stand out and reach the people you want faster. I ran my own business for most of my adult life and hiring is one of the hugest things that you have to take on when you run a business. Doing outreach and waiting for people to come back to you. All that stuff is so painful. I wish there was a podcast ad telling me about Indeed back then. There's no need to wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed and listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit. To get your jobs more visibility@indeed.com invisible just go to indeed.com invisible right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com Invisible terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need in business. They say you can have better, cheaper or faster, but you only get to pick two. What if you could have all three at the same time? That's exactly what Cohere Thomson Reuters and Specialized Bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development and AI needs where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistency, consistently high performance environment and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second, cheaper OCI costs up to 50% less for compute, 75% less for storage, and 80% less for networking. Better. In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds. This is the cloud built for AI and always your biggest workloads. Right now, with zero commitment, try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com invisible that's oracle.com invisible.
Unknown
From the 1930s into the 1970s, the Federal Trade Commission aggressively enforced the Robinson Patent Act. It issued citations and cease and desist orders to companies who violated the law. This had the effect of reining in powerful chains like amp. It also acted as a deterrent to other businesses who might be on the verge of their very own monopolistic power trip.
Chris Berube
But the backlash from big business was always coming. Since the New Deal, antitrust laws, like Robinson Patman acted as a check on corporate power. But in the 1970s, anti a new school of economic thought took hold. It argued that traditional FDR era antitrust enforcement was actually holding the American economy back. And to unlock America's full economic potential, we needed to completely rethink antitrust.
Ad
A key figure in the dismantling of our antitrust laws is Robert Bork.
Unknown
Robert Bork was a professor of antitrust law at Yale, but he's probably best known for his political career. He was the one who carried out Nixon's order to fire the special prosecutor investigating Watergate. The Saturday Night Massacre. That's Robert Bork.
Chris Berube
Bork's name was also famously turned into a verb. After his failed confirmation to the Supreme Court, he got borked.
Unknown
As an academic, Bork was part of this rising tide of scholars trying to reshape antitrust in a more free market direction. And to help do that, he published a book in 1978 that became a manifesto for the movement.
Ad
He writes this book called the Antitrust Paradox. And it is a kind of bestseller, if you will, for a policy book. And it has this incredible influence across the right and even to some degree, among Democrats.
Unknown
In the Antitrust Paradox, Bork argues that for decades, American antitrust claimed to be about protecting competition and consumers. But in reality, antitrust only protected inefficient companies and punished the successful ones. And this paradox, he said, actually harmed consumers because it led to higher prices.
Chris Berube
At the time, Bork's argument had a receptive audience. The American economy struggled during the 70s with high inflation and low growth. Grocery prices were skyrocketing. And Bork insisted traditional antitrust enforcement was making things worse. And he didn't just throw tomatoes from the Sidelines. In his book, Robert Bork laid out a new vision for antitrust, one that he claimed was based on a close, accurate reading of the nation's first antitrust laws.
Ad
You know, Bork very much believed that, you know, corporations should be free to wield their power and do what they want, and that, you know, the laws that we'd always understood to mean that we should disperse power, that we should prevent too much consolidation, that's not really what those laws were about.
Unknown
He thought that antitrust was all about efficiency, and big corporations tend to be more efficient. So you know what? We should actually use antitrust to encourage corporate consolidation.
Ad
So he, like, turned antitrust on its head.
Unknown
In Robert Bork's view, antitrust enforcement had been overly concerned with fairness. After all, fairness was subjective. A truly objective policy would use what he called the consumer welfare standard. And this new standard he came up with focused on prices over basically everything else.
Ad
Part of how Bork and his cohort sell this idea is by saying that prices are measurable, efficiency is measurable. Like, it's like one North Star. We can point antitrust to this. Like, there's an answer, you know, to the problem or any question that's asked, we can find an answer like, is this merger good or bad? Well, does it? Will it lead to lower prices? That's one question, one answer that then guides policy. That's the thinking behind it.
Unknown
And to really help drive home his case for the consumer welfare standard, Robert Bork turned the Robinson Patman act into his punching bag.
Chris Berube
It should be said that almost the scholarly opinion on all sides of the antitrust issue is that the Robinson Patman act is a peculiarly pernicious statute.
Unknown
In his book, Bork calls the law, quote, antitrust's least glorious hour. Elsewhere, he called it the Typhoid Mary of antitrust.
Chris Berube
Robert Bork didn't just dislike the Robinson Patman act, he loathed it. So in his writing, he characterized it as this crazy, stupid law.
Ad
And he creates this environment where for decades, any economist worth their salt, any legal scholar worth their salt, would never say, like, that the Robinson Patman act was a good thing. Like, you couldn't venture. Your professional career would be sort of destroyed by saying that. It would be sort of like saying the earth is flat.
Chris Berube
In the 80s, Bork's ideas made the leap from the page into the halls of power. All throughout government, antitrust positions were filled with appointees who agreed with Bork's philosophy. Laws were reinterpreted and new policy guidelines were issued. The Bork era of antitrust was underway, and it was built on the consumer welfare standard.
Unknown
And in this new era, the Robinson Patman act wasn't so much killed by authorities as. As it was disappeared.
Ad
They just kind of decided, well, we're just going to put that law up on a shelf and we're not going to enforce it.
Unknown
For decades, the Robinson Patman act remained up on that shelf gathering dust, still technically a law, but ignored. The occasional person might come by and flip through it like an old photo album. But it was understood through different administrations, Republican and Democrat, that this was a thing of the past, a relic of a bygone era of antitrust.
Chris Berube
That is, until the 2010s when some prominent researchers and legal scholars started to really assess the impacts of its retirement.
Unknown
Is it almost like literally the case that businesses are checking the antitrust landscape and are just like, nobody's looking at Robinson Patman anymore, so, like, do whatever you want?
Lina Khan
Absolutely. I mean, I had, you know, lawyers and even a general counsel at a company tell me that they don't even advise their companies to follow the Robinson Patent act because it's not enforced.
Unknown
This is Lena Khan. She was appointed chair of the FTC under President Biden. Khan is often talked about as the antidote to Robert Bork, which is kind of funny because they're both Yale Law School alums.
Lina Khan
Yeah, the class where I learned antitrust law in law school had a big portrait of Bork in the back.
Unknown
Did having that portrait, like, behind you make you feel any kind of way?
Lina Khan
It felt very apt. I mean, Robert Bork taught at Yale Law School. The professor who was still teaching antitrust had been close with Bork, kind of a colleague of his. And so it felt very fitting in that way.
Chris Berube
Khan is one of the leaders of what's known today as the anti monopoly movement. And she first rose to prominence after writing a paper that really stuck it to Bork. It's titled Amazon's Antitrust Paradox. And as far as academic papers go, it was a real bombshell, setting off big debates in antitrust circles.
Unknown
In her research, Lina Khan says that understanding antitrust through Bork's framework is entirely too narrow. It allowed companies like Amazon to amass power with very little scrutiny. And she thought this level of consolidated power has actually resulted in bad outcomes, not just for consumers, but for society.
Chris Berube
And one way to plainly show these bad outcomes is by looking at what happened to the grocery business.
Unknown
When the government deep sixed Robinson Patman, it was too late for the grocery giant. Amp the company eventually Went out of business. But in its place, another goliath had emerged. Walmart.
Chris Berube
In the late 1980s, Walmart entered the grocery business and quickly took a page out of A&P's playbook from back in the day.
Lina Khan
Well, once the Robinson Patman act is shelved, you see, big retailers like Walmart start demanding discounts from their suppliers. And not just demanding discounts, but demanding that they get systematically lower prices than what their rivals are getting.
Unknown
The suspension of Robinson Patman created a new incentive in the industry who could get bigger faster, because the faster you grew, the quicker you could leverage your size over suppliers.
Chris Berube
The incentive to get bigger faster resulted in a massive merger spree. In the 1990s, independent and even regional grocers were swallowed up by the big national chains like Kroger and Albertsons and Safeway, all of which are huge companies in their own right. But even they were looking to bulk up.
Lina Khan
Certainly when the big grocers have been consolidating, One of the arguments that they make is that we need to get bigger so that we can actually get the same discriminatory discounts that the big guys are.
Unknown
This new dynamic in the grocery business, rampant consolidation in search of the lowest prices, absolutely decimated small neighborhood grocers. The waterbed effect was in full effect. Big chains like Walmart could extract discounts from suppliers, and in turn, suppliers would make up for any shortfalls by charging smaller stores more.
Lina Khan
In effect, what you have then is the smaller retailers subsidizing the discounts that Walmart is getting. And what's going to happen over the long run is those independent grocers are going to get squeezed and are going to get pushed out of the market.
Chris Berube
For people in places like woonsocket, Rhode island, All this consolidation meant more residents had to rely on big chains for groceries. Walmart opened a store in Woonsocket back in 1994, and as the company captured a bigger slice of the market, locally owned grocers felt the pressure. Many of them closed, but in a.
Unknown
Pattern that has played out in lots of communities. After Walmart helped drive a bunch of grocers out of business, Walmart closed, too, Only to open a new store in a more central location a few miles down the road in another town. Here's Stacy Mitchell again.
Ad
You know, kind of looking back at this history, the sort of question becomes, well, you can understand how the suspension of Robinson Patman led to the demise of independent grocers, but the question becomes like, well, why didn't chains fill those gaps? And the answer is that they didn't have to because we know people have to eat. So they're going to come out to our other stores and we don't have to actually spend the money to operate a store in the neighborhood.
Unknown
When Walmart or another big chain leaves town, they don't just abandon the place. Sometimes they make it impossible for other competitors to move in. For example, Walmart owns most of their buildings, and when they sell it, they can impose a restriction on the deed, banning, say, another grocer from opening up in the same place. These scorched earth covenants, as they're called, can last decades. So not only are the scales tipped in their favor, but some national grocers are known to salt the earth on their way out.
Chris Berube
This is the playbook Walmart used to become America's grocer. Today the company captures one in every four dollars Americans spend on groceries. In some metro areas, Walmart has captured half the grocery market. In others, the number is closer to 70%.
Ad
You know, this is a level of power that is way beyond anything that A and P ever got to.
Unknown
Stacy Mitchell and Lina Khan both agree that the decline of small local grocers, paired with the rise of Walmart and other big national chains, has fundamentally altered the food landscape. Especially in low income neighborhoods where these deep concentrations of corporate power have left residents traveling further and further for groceries.
Ad
39 million Americans live in an area that's classified as a food desert. There are food deserts all across the country. There are so many communities that have been hollowed out where people are struggling on a day to day basis. Like not having a grocery store nearby is a daily hardship and an indignity.
Unknown
By Robert Bork's standards, a food desert is actually, in its own twisted way and an efficient economic outcome. If large companies like Walmart drive out smaller, less efficient grocers and nobody chooses to serve that low income community, that's not a market failure, it's a market outcome. It's just something that happens.
Chris Berube
Lina Khan believes by favoring what Bork would call the most efficient grocers, consumers have been harmed in other ways. The geographic distribution of stores is a problem. The health outcomes of people living in food deserts is a problem. And in case you haven't paid attention to our politics in the last four years, the price of groceries is still a problem too.
Lina Khan
The attack line was Robinson Patman. Enforcement results in higher prices for people. That was the argument that was offered. But once you try to trace that argument back to actual evidence or support, there's no evidence it's really arguments that are made on theory, and they're not actually supported by what's happening in the real world.
Unknown
In the real world, national chains have amassed so much power in some places that they're actually able to inflate prices. We saw this play out during the pandemic. At the time, supply chain issues were driving prices up, and big chains use that as an opportunity to turn bigger profits.
Lina Khan
It was really striking to hear some of the executives from these big grocers talk on their earnings calls, where sometimes there was a recognition that even though the costs were going to go down because those supply chain issues would resolve themselves, the grocers decided in some cases to keep prices high anyway. And that's something that you can only get away with if you're not being disciplined by competition.
Unknown
The retirement of Robinson Patman was supposed to drive prices down for consumers. But in an industry as consolidated as the grocery business, monopolistic power starts to act in monopolistic ways. And so when Lina Khan was appointed chair of the ftc, she decided to do something bold.
Lina Khan
So the FTC during my tenure ended up reviving the Robinson Patman Act.
Unknown
During her time at the ftc, Lena and her team pursued the first Robinson Patman cases in over 20 years. One of those cases was against Pepsi, which, by the way, doesn't just make soda. They're also one of the biggest suppliers in the grocery sector.
Chris Berube
Quaker Oats, Pepsi, Ocean Spray, Pepsi Rolled Gold Pretzels, Pepsi. It's really just Pepsi all the way down.
Unknown
The FTC's case alleged that Pepsi was giving unfair price advantages to Walmart at the expense of competing retailers. So should I explain Waterbeds again? Okay, so if you sit on one side or. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding.
Lina Khan
You know, I went and visited some of the independent grocers and independent wholesalers that said they were being discriminated against in this way. And what they would tell me is that if they went to a Costco or a Walmart or a Target, the prices on the shelves would be lower than what was being made available to them at a wholesale level, which is pretty staggering in terms of just the types of huge price differences that may be happening.
Unknown
For too long, the FTC hasn't been skeptical enough towards monopoly power. Bringing this case was just one way Lina Khan hoped to change that and at the same time show the public that the government can truly take on big problems.
Lina Khan
I think people had in some ways lost hope that the government would really go back to doing its job in this way. And so I heard a lot from people that, especially for grocers and other independent stores that had been feeling squeezed for a very long time, this was a sign of hope for them.
Chris Berube
In recent weeks, Trump's FTC voted to drop the Pepsi case, calling it a legally dubious partisan stunt. Lina Khan says that lawsuit would have helped stop conduct that squeezes small businesses, and dismissing it was a gift to giant retailers. The FTC is still technically pursuing one more Robinson Patman case, but it's hard to say what the future of that case looks like.
Unknown
Regardless, Khan's criticisms of Bork's antitrust ideas have already started to make an impact. Last year, when the Kroger Albertsons merger was blocked, courts cited evidence that this amount of consolidation would lead to more food deserts and higher prices. Khan also helped implement new federal merger guidelines, which the Trump administration kept. And that means any merger that crosses the government's desk will have a much higher standard to meet, not just Robert Bork's consumer welfare standard. Sounds like you're wrapping up.
Gene Michon
Yeah, they're wrapping up. Yep.
Unknown
Ringing it up. Let me just fill the water up.
Gene Michon
Henry, how old are you? 84.
Unknown
84. Back in Woonsocket, when I met up with Jean Michonne, she was in her element inside a kitchen. Gene actually runs an organization named New Beginnings. It's a community kitchen that helps feed some of the city's most food insecure. On a warm, sunny April day the first of the year, she had 40 paper boxes laid out in a neat square to pack leftovers. That's left. None of this goes to waste.
Gene Michon
No, absolutely not. Absolutely not. I've been doing this 39 years. I don't waste anything.
Unknown
Gene has been around one socket long enough to see a food desert emerge, and she decided to do something about it. The whole organization at New Beginnings has created a vital piece of infrastructure in the city. For a long time, kitchens like hers have helped feed people who don't have the means. But over the years, she's noticed more people drop in who simply can't make it to a grocery store. And to help serve these families, she's planning to work even longer hours.
Gene Michon
Right now, we just do lunch. So if there's working families who, you know, can't get to food, they can't get to lunch with us. We want to expand to do meals at night as well. So we'll reach one population during the day and one population at night.
Unknown
Decades of neglect created Woonsocket's food desert. Laws went unenforced and corporate power ran amok. Recently, lawmakers in Rhode island proposed a package of antitrust laws aimed directly at the grocery business, including a local version of a Robinson Patman Act. But until something really changes, Jean is just going to be here in her kitchen, doing her best to serve the people this whole system left behind.
Chris Berube
99% invisible was produced this week by Jason De Leon and edited by me, Chris Barube and the team at 99 Invisible. Mix by Martin Gonzalez Music by Swan Royale Fact Checking by Graham Hacha Special thanks this week to Stacy Mitchell over at the Institute for Local Self Reliance. She's been writing about food deserts in the Atlantic and other publications for years now. You can find links to some of her articles on our website. Also, a special thanks this week to Ethan Shorey over at the Valley Breeze. There are not a lot of local publications covering places like Woonsocket at this point, and the archives of the Valley Breeze were tremendously helpful in the research for this story. So thank you. An extra special thank you to Gene Michon and the whole New Beginnings organization. Their work out in Rhode island is truly heroic. Kathy Tu is our Executive producer, Curt Kohlsted is our Digital Director, Delaney hall is our Senior editor, and the rest of the team includes Emmett Fitzgerald, Christopher Johnson, Vivian Leigh Lasha, Madonn, Jacob Medina Gleason, Kelly prime, and Joe Rosenberg. And of course, Roman Mars is our fearless leader. The 99% invisible logo was created by Stefan Lawrence. We are part of the SiriusXM podcast family, temporarily headquartered this week between Providence, Rhode island and beautiful downtown Toronto, Ontario, Canada. You can find us on all the usual social media sites as well as our Discord server. There's a lot going on there. You can find a link to that as well as every past episode of 99pi@99pi.org.
Dell
In the summer, all of Oregon is our playground thanks to our incredible park system. That's why it's so cool that Oregon Lottery gameplay like video lottery or cash pop helps support tons of parks projects statewide like accessible trails at Silver Falls State park or upgrades to your facilities favorite dog park in Newburgh. It's just one way a little lottery play for many Oregonians can add up to a lot of good the Oregon Lottery Together we do good things. Lottery games are based on chance and should be played for entertainment only. Must be 18 or older to play.
Host: Roman Mars
Episode Released: July 8, 2025
Location: Woonsocket, Rhode Island
Producers: Jason De Leon, Chris Berube
The episode begins with an exploration of Woonsocket, Rhode Island, a town emblematic of broader issues related to food deserts in the United States. Chris Berube sets the scene:
"This is 99% invisible. I'm Chris Berube, sitting in this week for Roman Mars in Woonsocket, Rhode Island..." (00:51)
Woonsocket, once vibrant with local businesses and community hubs like movie theaters and arcades, has transformed into a food desert—a low-income area with limited access to affordable and nutritious food.
Gene Michon, a third-generation resident of Woonsocket, provides a personal narrative of the town's decline:
"Back in the 1970s... I remember always jumping at the chance to go with my mom to the grocery store." (01:50)
Gene recalls the proliferation of local grocery stores and the communal experience of shopping. However, as factory jobs disappeared and economic hardship set in, these stores gradually closed, leaving only one remaining supermarket—Price Rite—on the town's outskirts.
"It's sad that people don't have other choices to make... this Price Rite is the only spot they can go to get refreshed." (03:29)
Chris Berube explains the concept of food deserts:
"Woonsocket is what's known as a food desert. These are low income communities where it's hard to find groceries." (03:49)
The USDA defines food deserts as areas where residents live more than a mile from the nearest grocery store, a significant barrier considering that nearly 20% of Woonsocket's residents lack access to a vehicle.
The episode delves into the historical factors contributing to the emergence of food deserts, focusing on the Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (A&P), one of America's first national grocery chains.
A&P revolutionized the grocery industry by eliminating delivery services and credit systems used by small, independent grocers. Instead, they implemented a business model based on cash transactions and vertical integration, which allowed them to offer the lowest prices in town.
"A and P did away with deliveries and purchases on credit. Instead, customers would pay on the spot with cash." (07:31)
By the early 1930s, A&P had expanded to over 15,000 stores nationwide, using its scale to negotiate favorable terms with suppliers while pressuring competitors by not offering them the same discounts.
Stacy Mitchell, a food researcher, explains how the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 was a pivotal response to A&P's monopolistic practices:
"The Robinson Patman act outlaws price discrimination... suppliers must offer the same deals to all retailers." (12:40)
This legislation aimed to level the playing field, preventing large chains like A&P from dominating the market at the expense of smaller, local grocers. The Act mandated that suppliers could not provide different prices to different buyers, curbing A&P's ability to squeeze independent competitors.
A&P resisted these changes, lobbying against the Act and attempting to argue that their size was not problematic. However, enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) gradually diminished A&P's market dominance.
In the 1970s and 1980s, Robert Bork's critique of antitrust laws marked a significant shift in American economic policy. His book, "The Antitrust Paradox," argued that antitrust laws should focus solely on consumer welfare, primarily through the lens of price efficiency.
"Antitrust should encourage corporate consolidation because big corporations are more efficient." (24:05)
This perspective led to the erosion of the Robinson-Patman Act’s influence, as newer policies prioritized efficiency over fair competition. As a result, big chains like Walmart emerged, replicating A&P’s strategies on a grander scale.
With weakened antitrust enforcement, Walmart entered the grocery sector in the late 1980s, adopting aggressive discounting practices that outcompeted smaller grocers. This led to a wave of mergers and acquisitions in the 1990s, further consolidating the grocery market under a few large national chains.
Lina Khan, chair of the FTC under President Biden, elaborates on the impact of this consolidation:
"Big retailers like Walmart start demanding discounts from their suppliers... making it hard for smaller grocers to compete." (29:54)
This consolidation not only reduced competition but also contributed to the proliferation of food deserts. As Walmart and similar chains dominated, smaller stores struggled to survive, leading to reduced accessibility to fresh and affordable groceries in many communities.
The episode highlights ongoing efforts to address the resurgence of food deserts. Lina Khan’s tenure at the FTC marks a renewed interest in enforcing antitrust laws to curb the monopolistic power of large retailers.
"The FTC revived the Robinson Patman Act to address unfair price advantages... restoring hope for independent grocers." (36:34)
Despite these efforts, challenges persist. Recent political shifts, such as the Trump administration's decision to drop key FTC cases against giants like Pepsi, have undermined these regulatory advancements.
Gene Michon’s organization, New Beginnings, symbolizes grassroots efforts to mitigate the effects of food deserts:
"We've been doing this 39 years. I don't waste anything." (39:55)
Their community kitchen provides essential services to those most affected by inadequate access to groceries, highlighting the human cost of policy failures.
The episode concludes by emphasizing the need for robust antitrust enforcement to prevent the emergence of new food deserts. Legislative proposals in Rhode Island aim to reintroduce local versions of the Robinson-Patman Act, seeking to restore balance in the grocery market.
Gene Michon remains dedicated to her mission:
"We want to expand to do meals at night as well... reach one population during the day and one population at night." (40:34)
The story of Woonsocket serves as a microcosm of national trends, illustrating how policy decisions can have profound effects on community health and accessibility.
Special thanks to Stacy Mitchell of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance and Ethan Shorey of the Valley Breeze for their contributions. Gene Michon and the New Beginnings organization were instrumental in providing insights into the lived experiences of Woonsocket’s residents.
Listen to the full episode on 99percentinvisible.org.