Loading summary
Transcript8 lines
- [00:01]
Capital One Bank Guy
Banking with Capital One helps you keep more money in your wallet with no fees or minimums on checking accounts and no overdraft fees. Just ask the Capital One Bank Guy. It's pretty much all he talks about in a good way. He'd also tell you that this podcast is his favorite podcast too. Oh really? Thanks Capital One Bank Guy. What's in your wallet? Terms apply. See capital1.com Bank Capital One NA Member FDIC.
- [00:34]
Erin Menke
Welcome to Erin Menke's Cabinet of Curiosities, a production of iHeartRadio and Grim and Mild.
- [00:43]
Aaron Manke
Our world is full of the unexplainable, and if history is an open book, all of these amazing tales are right there on display, just waiting for us to explore. Welcome to the Cabinet of Curiosities.
- [01:06]
Erin Menke
Defeat it's not something any of us hope to encounter in life, but for almost all of us, it is inevitable. However, for military commanders, defeat has mortal consequences. Every move, every choice on the battlefield means some men will die. Commanders just have to hope that they make enough right choices so that casualties are limited and victory is secured. In 1904, there was one naval commander who unfortunately made all the wrong choices. His defeat was so total that it changed the course of history and is still studied to this day. Admiral Zinovy Mad Dog Rozhasvensky was known for his strong command style. As the leader of Russia's Baltic Fleet, it was on him to oversee a huge number of ships in the oceans north of Europe. Everything changed In February of 1904, though, when Japanese Admiral Togo Heihachiro led an assault on the Russian port authority in modern day northeastern China. The Japanese were tired of the Russians encroaching on land and resources in the Yellow Sea. The Russians were used to being the strongest power in the region, and they paid no mind to their Chinese and Japanese neighbors. But Japan was a newly industrialized nation after the meiji Restoration in 1868, which brought back Imperial rule, the Japanese rolled over the Russians on land and sea, overwhelming them with superior tactics and technology. As such, Russia's only hope for reinforcements was Rozhosevensky's Baltic Fleet. But the problem is right there in the name. The Baltic Fleet was in the Baltic Sea on the other side of Russia, over 4,000 miles away by land and quite a bit farther by water, and they would have to travel all the way around the eastern hemisphere to reach the Yellow Sea. The Tsar renamed the Baltic Fleet the 2nd Pacific Fleet, and it began its long journey in October of 1904. It took seven months for the fleet to travel around Africa and across the Indian Ocean and South China Sea to reach their destination. Which is why it wasn't until May of 1905 that the fleet finally arrived in the Strait of Tsushima, where they were to engage the enemy. But right away, the balance was not in the Russians favorite. The sea was incredibly foggy, and so they could barely see anything or even communicate from boat to boat with signals. Heihachiro, meanwhile, had spent the long months since the Battle of Port Arthur outfitting his ships with new telegraph technology that allowed them to communicate wirelessly. His boats patrolled the straits, watching for any sign of the Russians. And that's when Rozhezvensky made a costly mistake. He kept his hospital ship lit, meaning that it could be seen through the fog. In the old ways of war, a hospital ship was lit up so that the enemy would know not to fire on it. But this was the dawn of a new age, and Heihachiro had no knowledge of Western customs. Rozhasvensky's next mistake was to assume that Heihachiro would bring his ships alongside the Russians for a broadside attack. This was the traditional attack, but once again, Heihachiro was only interested in new ways of war. Instead, he crossed the T, a naval warfare tactic where a commander brings his ship in front of the enemy column instead of alongside, forming a T shape. This allows the attacker to use all of their cannons, while the enemy can only use the few cannons on the front of their ships. Once Heihachiro caught sight of the hospital ship, he crossed the T and opened fire on the Russians. Rozhashvensky tried to surrender, but the Japanese didn't understand the Russian signals. They completely destroyed the Russian navy, killing 10,000 Russians while only losing a thousand Japanese sailors. The Russians soon had no choice but to cede control of the Yellow Sea to Japan. It was the first time an Eastern power had defeated a Western power in battle, and it gave the Japanese the confidence to continue to grow and expand their empire. Rozy Zvensky was wounded, but he survived and taken to a Japanese hospital. While he was recovering, Heihachiro visited him, saying, defeat is a common fate of a soldier. There is nothing to be ashamed of in it. The even bigger lesson for Russia, though, was one of the dangers of hubris. They were not innately superior to their Eastern neighbors. It was a lesson learned far too late, as Rozhvensky wasted months of his life and the actual lives of his men in his vain attempt to save his country's interests in Asia. Curiously, the Japanese would learn the same lesson decades later when they, like the Russians, overextended themselves and foolishly attacked a different, newly industrialized power across the Pacific. But that's a curious story for another day.
- [05:54]
Cindy Crawford
Now I'd like to introduce you to Meaningful Beauty, the famed skincare brand created by iconic supermodel Cindy Crawford. It's her secret to absolutely gorgeous skin. Meaningful Beauty makes powerful and effective skin care simple and it's loved by millions of women. It's formulated for all ages and all skin tones and types. And it's designed to work as a complete skin care system, leaving your skin feeling soft, smooth and nourished. I recommend starting with Cindy's full regimen, which contains all five of her best selling products, including the Amazing Youth Activating Melon Serum. This next generation serum has the power of melon leaf stem cell technology. It's melonleaf stem cells encapsulated for freshness and released onto the skin to support a visible reduction in the appearance of WR. With thousands of glowing 5 star reviews, why not give it a try? Subscribe today and you can get the Amazing Meaningful Beauty system for just $49.95. That includes our introductory five piece system, free gifts, free shipping, and a 60 day money back guarantee. All of that available@meaningfulbeauty.com.
- [06:56]
Disney Cruise Enthusiast
Okay, ladies, when I said we came to play, didn't I mean it? This Disney cruise got me feeling like a queen. We can get massages at Sense's spa, have a meet and greet with Black Panther. Ooh, I love him. And I can't wait to sunbathe on the private island. And the kids will be fine. Girl, they're good. Exactly. While they hang in the kids club with Mickey Mouse, we can do our thing. Mm. And do it well all day. Disney Cruise Line is where we came to play.
- [07:32]
Erin Menke
Why do we put people on trial? It seems like this question should have an obvious answer, but it doesn't. An idealist might say that trials expose truth and hand out justice. A cynic might say that they exist simply to strike fear into potential criminals, hopefully preventing crime in the future. Both would agree, though, that whatever the driving motivation, criminal proceedings provide closure to the victims of a crime. If someone has wronged you, there is immense relief, in theory at least, and seeing the wrongdoer condemned by an official body and punished for their acts. But what if the perpetrator of a crime has no understanding of the laws? What if human law was not designed to govern them at all? You see, scattered throughout history are a handful of peculiar cases where Judges and juries had to determine the guilt of not a person, but an animal. From the 9th to the 20th century, there were at least 196 cases of animal trials conducted in civilized nations. The majority of these recorded cases were in mainland Europe. France, to be precise. And While just under 200 cases spread across 10 centuries doesn't sound like a lot, it has provoked intense study among historians and has produced some fascinating stories. For example, in 1386, the Norman City of Falaise conducted a trial for a pig who was accused of eating an infant. The pig was sentenced to maiming and death. Once the sentence was delivered, it was wounded on the head and forelegs and then marched to the gallows before an enormous crowd. On the way to the rope, it was allegedly dressed in a new suit, as was customary for prisoners of the time. And pigs are famously ravenous creatures. So it's not a surprise that the Falaise trial is not the only pig that has been found guilty of murder. In 14th century Savigny, a pig and its six piglets were put on trial for the death of a five year old boy. The owner of the animal was also tried for negligence. And yet, by the time the court reached its verdict, only the animal was punished. The pig was to be put to death. The piglets, by the way, were spared. Although they were also found covered in blood on the scene of the crime, it was impossible to determine whether they were also guilty. Reasonable doubt cleared the piglets of wrongdoing, and in some cases, these animals on trial would not face the judge undefended. In the early 1500s, for example, a young French attorney named Bartholomew Chesany successfully defended the rats of Auton, who had been accused of eating the barley crop. Overall, you can divide European animal trials into two secular and ecclesiastical. A secular trial would pertain to domestic animals under human control, such as dogs, livestock, birds and beasts of burden. But animals that were not under human control, such as rats and insects, would, would fall under the jurisdiction of the Church. Thus ecclesiastical. Oh, and on occasion, there would be an overlap with local folklore, as was the case with a rooster that in 1474 laid an egg. The court could not determine whether the egg had become a basilisk or a cockatrice, but both carried the same sentence, death for the bird in question. No one seems to have considered that this was a female chicken that had been misidentified as a rooster. It's strange to consider that these sorts of trials occurred at all, and that they were not driven by hysterical mobs, but by town officials. Bishops and lawyers. From the Middle Ages into the early Renaissance, animals were considered as much of their respective communities as the people themselves. So perhaps we should not be surprised that the Middle Ages were rife with animal crime. Europe had been ravaged by the Black Death, and if they could have found the rats guilty of mass slaughter by spreading plague, they surely would have done so after the Dark Ages. The symbolic importance of a trial mattered more than justice or deterrence. In a chaotic time, the trial didn't exist for the victims or the perpetrators. It was held for the community at large. Proof, it seems, that social order mattered and that no one was above the law, not even an animal.
- [11:43]
Aaron Manke
I hope you've enjoyed today's guided tour of the Cabinet of Curiosities. Subscribe for free on Apple Podcasts or learn more about the show by visiting curiositiespodcast.com this show was created by me, Aaron Manke, in partnership with How Stuff Works. I make another award winning show called Lore, which is a podcast, book series and television show and you can learn all about it over@theworldoflore.com and until next time, stay curious.