
Guest Anita Ventrelli
Loading summary
A
Intersection of family law and trusts and estates that is the subject of today's ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk.
B
Welcome to ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk from the American College of Trust and Estate Council, a professional society of peer elected trust and estate lawyers in the United States and around the globe. This series offers professionals best practice advice, insights and commentary on subjects that affect our profession and clients. And now our ACTEC Fellow host with today's topic.
A
This is ACTECH Fellow Margaret Van Houten of West Des Moines, Iowa. Today we will be discussing family law in more detail, specifically consideration of the conflict of interest, joint estate planning, and documenting aspects of trust and estate planning that could be an issue in the dissolution of a marriage. American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Fellow Anita Ventrelli from Chicago joins us as a guest to discuss this topic in more detail and share her thoughts with estate professionals. Welcome, Anita.
C
Thank you so much, Margaret. Happy to be here. Happy to be sharing with this group. Family law attorneys do a tremendous amount of work with Estate and Trust Council when we work on matters that involve complex financial situations, premarital agreements, post nuptial agreements, marital settlement agreements, and it always helps I think for one discipline to have the thoughts that go through the heads of the folks and the other discipline in order to be most effective. The first tip I want to give you of the three I'm going to cover today is about making sure that you do what's necessary to prevent conflicts of interest from creating issues with any estate plan that you do. In many states, the rules, the ethical rules on conflicts of interest, prohibit an attorney from represent entering into a joint representation if they can reasonably foresee that the two individuals involved could become adverse to one another, it doesn't go without saying in this context that two people who are married could face a divorce. So when you're going to represent a married couple in engaging in joint estate planning, you must get conflict of interest waivers that mirror the rules of the jurisdiction where you're doing the estate plan. That means making sure that if this is a concurrent representation, meaning you're representing both at the same time that you make sure they sign whatever acknowledgments conform to the rules in your state about doing that. You should also consider when engaging in that kind of joint representation, taking certain pieces of the representation and recommending in writing that the two individuals seek separate counsel. What do I mean by that? Well, if a married couple are engaging in a joint estate plan and the estate plan could remove property from a court's jurisdiction and the key example King off of Illinois law, which is where I practice, would be if property goes into an irrevocable trust. We typically when we are characterizing property for divorce purposes, we have the marital estate, one spouse's non marital estate, and the other spouse's non marital estate. As soon as property goes into the ownership of an irrevocable trust, it passes out of all of those estates that the court can control. So when you're going to be using your revocable trust as part of the estate plan, making sure that both spouses get advised independently of the effect that will have on their marital estate. For example, if there's a vacation home and the vacation home's going into the irrevocable trust, then the divorce court can't award that vacation home to one spouse or the other. It's not a surprise that many divorce lawyers get a hold of people and when they go through the tracing of how things are titled and the effects of the estate plan, that people learn things they didn't know before they learn that they can't get their vacation home. Sometimes they learn they can't even receive their primary residence. It's a question of good estate planning sometimes being like a harmful drug interaction with what goes on in divorces. So making sure that you have a family law attorney look at the estate plan, talk to the individual and say, do you understand that this estate plan means this property won't be available to you in a divorce? Do you understand that these streams of income won't be available for your support in a divorce? That's key. And making sure that that lawyer that consults with them gives them a written opinion and that you get a copy of that written opinion for your file will make it so that you can say you got them the right advice to make a good and informed decision about entering into the estate plan. You can create the greatest estate plan in the world and it can save people a fortune in taxes. But if it means that when they get divorced there's no money for them to receive, they're not going to be terribly happy with you. So that's my pitch on conflicts of interest. Next up is a tip on consequences in divorce. When you're going to be making transfers while a couple is married, regardless of the purpose, they may have companies and you may create an estate plan that puts corporate interests into a holding company. You may create an estate plan that puts a corporate interest into a trust. You make a property into a trust. In some states, Illinois being one. There is. We have several principles. We have Presumptions as well. One presumption we have is that when a husband makes a gift to a wife, or a wife makes a gift to a husband, a spouse makes a gift to a spouse, it is presumed to be a gift. Any transfer a gift. There's also a presumption that when a parent makes a transfer to a child, there is a gift. Why does this matter? You might say, well, it matters because when we're categorizing property, many states that work off of the Uniform Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage act work with principals that everything acquired during the marriage is marital property with certain exceptions. One exception is an exception for property that individual receives by gift. Another exception is property that individual receives by inheritance. A third is property that individual receives by virtue of a valid and enforceable agreement under a section of the statute that allows the creation of non marital property. Also in many statutes, Illinois being one, is that if you make a transfer of property, if a spouse makes a transfer of property for purposes of fulfilling an estate plan, it will not be deemed a gift. It will not create non marital property. It might remove property from the estate into an irrevocable trust. But if a husband gives a wife or a wife gives a husband, or spouse gives a spouse property to hold, it won't render that property the spouse's non marital property. So from the estate and trust lawyer's perspective, if the only reason that people are making transfers that might be denominated as gifts in the estate and trust world is in furtherance of an estate plan, you should document that. You should have that acknowledged by both spouses because then if there's a divorce, they can walk that in and say we fulfilled the estate planning exception. So none of these transfers are deemed to be gifts creating non marital practices. So that's a documenting thing. The third thing I like to see when estate planners do work is acknowledgments and making sure that when they write things, or when we write things for that matter, as family law Council, that if we're writing an agreement where trusts and estates are in play, that we get your language right. And that if you're writing something in your world and you're going to mention the element of divorce, that you have the right terminology. One of the concepts that's a big deal for me is making sure that if someone's going to abrogate a statute, I'll use the simplest example. Most statutes have provisions that say that spousal support will terminate on death of the recipient, remarriage of the recipient, or the recipient cohabiting with another individual on a resident continuing conjugal basis. As soon as your agreement, no matter what the agreement is, states its own definition, you are abrogating the statute. What does this mean? Well, it means if the statute changes later, you've locked these folks into something that isn't the same as the statute. So having a conversation about what your statute does now, what abrogating it can mean, and having the client make a studied decision about whether they want to abrogate the statute will always serve you well. You'll get people calling you up saying the law just changed. There's a lower standard for cohabitation. Well, if you made your agreement read that the only terminating event for spousal support was remarriage and death, then you're out of luck because you've abrogated that statute. So when lawyers, especially divorce lawyers, give you something and they say, well, this comes straight from our statute, you should ask them questions like do we have to restate the statute in the agreement? What is the effect of stating this version of the statute in the agreement? Some people want to be locked into a today version of the statute. Others don't need to or shouldn't want to. So those are my three tips for Estate and Trust Counsel Working with Family Law Attorneys I will say that estate and Trust counsel are some of my most cherished contacts and I love the synergy of working with our disciplines when we have an agreement to do. And I often work with Trust and Estates Council when the divorce comes across the radar because making sure that you get the inputs from all of the disciplines is very meaningful in creating the best possible product for our clients.
A
Thank you Anita for that very interesting presentation.
B
Thank you for listening to this episode of ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk, the podcast series about wealth planning matters from the American College of Trust and Estate Council. To find an ACTEC lawyer near you, visit actec.org Please subscribe to this series and leave us a rating or a review.
Episode: Intersection of Family Law and Trusts and Estates
Date: December 3, 2024
Host: Margaret Van Houten (ACTEC Fellow)
Guest: Anita Ventrelli (Fellow, American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers)
This episode explores the critical overlap between family law and trusts and estates, offering actionable advice for estate planning professionals about conflict of interest, documentation, and the nuances that come into play during marital dissolution. Guest Anita Ventrelli—a leading family law practitioner—shares three essential tips for trust and estate counsel working with clients whose personal and financial lives may cross into family law territory.
(Start: 01:14)
Why It's Crucial:
Lawyers must be particularly vigilant about conflicts when jointly representing married couples in estate planning due to the inherent possibility of future adversity (i.e., divorce).
Best Practice:
Secure conflict of interest waivers that strictly adhere to jurisdictional rules.
Recommendation:
Advise both spouses—ideally in writing—to seek independent counsel, especially where trusts may remove property from the marital estate.
"You must get conflict of interest waivers that mirror the rules of the jurisdiction where you're doing the estate plan... You should also consider...recommending in writing that the two individuals seek separate counsel."
— Anita Ventrelli [02:09]
Illustration:
In Illinois, for example, placing a vacation home into an irrevocable trust puts it outside of court reach in divorce, which clients may not always realize.
"It's a question of good estate planning sometimes being like a harmful drug interaction with what goes on in divorces."
— Anita Ventrelli [04:31]
Documentation Tip:
Ensure you obtain and keep on file any written opinions from independent counsel so it is clear both parties made informed decisions.
(Start: 06:00)
Transfer Presumptions:
Many states, including Illinois, presume transfers between spouses or from parent to child as gifts—which can impact what is considered marital property in divorce.
Critical Distinction:
Property received by gift, inheritance, or through a valid agreement may be considered nonmarital—unless transferred solely to fulfill an estate plan.
Advice:
Estate planning professionals should clearly document the intent behind any transfers, especially between spouses, to prevent them being re-characterized as nonmarital gifts in divorce proceedings.
"If the only reason that people are making transfers that might be denominated as gifts in the estate and trust world is in furtherance of an estate plan, you should document that. You should have that acknowledged by both spouses..."
— Anita Ventrelli [07:13]
(Start: 08:07)
Importance of Language:
When marrying estate planning documents with marital agreements or family law matters, precise language is vital—especially regarding legal statutes that may change over time.
Statutory Abrogation:
If your agreement restates or departs from a statutory provision (e.g., how spousal support terminates), clients must understand that the agreement may not “update” with future legal changes.
Professional Coordination:
When using statutory language provided by a family lawyer, estate counsel should ask:
"As soon as your agreement...states its own definition, you are abrogating the statute. What does this mean? Well, it means if the statute changes later, you've locked these folks into something that isn't the same as the statute."
— Anita Ventrelli [08:40]
Client Education:
Attorneys should discuss whether locking into the current statute or allowing flexibility is in the client's best interest.
On multidisciplinary synergy:
"I love the synergy of working with our disciplines when we have an agreement to do. And I often work with Trust and Estates Counsel when the divorce comes across the radar because making sure that you get the inputs from all of the disciplines is very meaningful in creating the best possible product for our clients."
— Anita Ventrelli [09:53]
On the stakes of poor planning:
"You can create the greatest estate plan in the world and it can save people a fortune in taxes. But if it means that when they get divorced there's no money for them to receive, they're not going to be terribly happy with you."
— Anita Ventrelli [05:53]
| Segment | Timestamp | |-----------------------------------------------|---------------| | Introduction & Importance of Topic | 00:05 – 01:14 | | Conflict of Interest & Joint Representation | 01:14 – 06:00 | | Documenting Transfers & Divorce Consequences | 06:00 – 08:07 | | Importance of Precise Language & Statutes | 08:07 – 09:53 | | Reflections on Collaboration | 09:53 – 10:32 |
Anita Ventrelli brings a candid, practical, and collaborative tone, offering real-world examples and actionable advice. The conversation is friendly yet professional, designed to empower estate planners while encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration for the client's best interest.