
Loading summary
A
Useful but Overlooked Trusts A Planner's guide to when and how to use them that is the subject of today's ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk.
B
Welcome to ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk from the American College of Trust and Estate Council, a professional society of peer elected trust and estate lawyers in the United States and around the globe. This series offers professionals best practice advice, insights and commentary on subjects that affect our profession and clients. And now our ACTEC Fellow host with today's topic.
A
This is ACTECH Fellow Travis Hayes of Naples, Florida. Sometimes estate planners need to step outside the usual toolkit and consider more advanced, under the radar trusts. A health and Education exclusion trust, better known as a heat, is one example that can cover a family's medical and educational expenses across generations. But with specialized trust come trade offs, how do you weigh the opportunities against the risks? ACTEC Fellow Wendy Goff of Seattle, Washington joins us to explore these more nuanced trusts and share her practical insights. Welcome, Wendy.
C
Thank you, Travis. Good morning. Before we dive into the exotic structures, let's establish our foundation. Understanding what makes a trust a trust is crucial when we start exploring exploring these unusual arrangements an express trust is created when a grantor intentionally transfers legal ownership of property to a trustee for the benefit. Enjoyment of a beneficiary trust involve two distinct elements of asset legal title and beneficial title. Because a trust is not a legal entity, title to assets should be held by the trustee, not the trust. However, it's a modern tendency to treat the trust as a legal owner, and the Restatement of Trust hints that that is the direction that we're going that the trust can be treated as an independent legal entity. So with that background, let's start with the Health Education Exclusion Trust or HE Heat. These are particularly powerful for clients who've exhausted their GST exemption but still want to benefit future generations by having a charity as a beneficiary. This type of trust avoids GST tax for certain limited distributions. It provides for distributions for education and medical expenses that are not subject to gst. With respect to education, qualified transfers include tuition payments made directly to an educational organization for the education or training of an individual on behalf of a SCIP person. Payments for other educational expenses, such as room and board and fees don't qualify as qualified transfers, even when made directly to the educational institution, and would therefore be set subject to GST tax upon distribution. Similarly, qualified transfers for medical care are payments made on behalf of anyone for their medical expenses, so they're paid directly to the person who provides the medical care. The catch is that the trust must also provide for charitable distributions in a meaningful way. Another consideration for this type of trust is that we have to be aware of the separate share rule. This rule requires that separate and independent shares for different beneficiaries be treated as separate shares or trusts for purposes of determining the DNI allocable to beneficiaries. If the separate Share rule applies, the charity would be assigned its own share and this means that other shares no longer have a non skip person the charity as a beneficiary. So any distributions from that share would constitute a taxable distribution for GST purposes. To avoid the separate share rule characterization, the trustee should be granted broad discretion to determine and vary the annual charitable distributions from the trust rather than tying that distribution to amounts distributed to non charitable beneficiaries. So you shouldn't have a fraction or a set amount that goes to charity, but every year the charity must receive distributions that are meaningful. Given the complexities involved with heats, this technique should be considered only by clients who've exhausted their GST exemption, maintain charitable objectives, and seek to create an education and healthcare safety net for future generations. Next, I want to talk about alimony and maintenance trusts in Washington. We don't have alimony, we have maintenance. So we also refer to it as a maintenance trust. But typically you'll hear these referred to as an alimony trust. Under former section 682, we could shift income tax on alimony to a former spouse. So alimony trusts were more popular, but they still have a place in our toolbox. They protect against the payor's death or insolvency. They ensure remaining assets can be passed to designated residuary beneficiaries when the alimony is paid in full, and they provide neutral third party management and reduced interspousal conflict because you have a trustee between them. Post repeal of section 682, the grantor continues to be taxed on the income of the trust even after divorce. For practitioners advising clients on spousal trusts, whether during marriage or even in a prenup or a postnup, careful consideration should be given to having this asset available for use as an alimony trust. If that becomes necessary in the future, some practitioners suggest including mandatory reimbursement provisions requiring a donation ex spouse to reimburse the donor spouse for income taxes either from the trust itself or from other assets. An alimony trust may still be particularly useful if a business owner cannot or doesn't want to sell an interest in the family business to make payments to the former spouse or if the business lacks the liquidity to redeem the stock of the former spouse, the business owner could fund an alimony trust with equity in the family business, shifting the income generated by the equity interest to the former spouse for a defined term. The business owner could even serve as a trustee, and the instrument could provide that the former spouse's interest reverts back to the business upon termination. Next, I'm going to move to a voting trust, which can be a useful tool in a divorce. Sometimes voting trusts allow shareholders to transfer voting rights to trustees while retaining economic interests. These are valuable for family business succession planning as well. A voting trust is distinguishable from a proxy in that it may serve broader purposes beyond mere voting rights and create a more durable arrangement. Whereas a proxy is typically revocable and limited to voting matters, most states have adopted some form of voting trust statute. A Washington voting trust becomes effective upon registration of the first shares in the trustee's name, and like most voting trust statutes, it's valid for 10 years following its effective date. Delaware's voting trust statute allows for tremendous flexibility, particularly because it's not subject to a time limitation. Voting trusts may also be used to implement multi generational planning strategies, which are particularly valuable for family businesses, where ownership may be distributed among multiple family members with varying levels of business involvement and expertise. They also serve as useful mechanisms to carry out environmental, social and governance objectives. Another trust I want to talk about is the blind trust for business executives. Blind trusts are often necessary to comply with securities laws regarding insider trading. The trust should have an independent trustee with discretion to buy and sell pursuant to guidelines established when the executive doesn't possess material non public information. That wraps up my discussion of unusual trusts. As we look to the future, we're seeing fascinating emerging structures personal revival, trusts for cryogenic preservation, trusts for cryptocurrency and NFTs and other blockchain assets. We're even seeing trusts designed to hold social media accounts and digital Personas.
A
Thank you thank you Wendy for giving us an overview of useful trusts that are sometimes overlooked by estate planning and the circumstances under which these type of trusts should be considered.
B
Thank you for listening to this episode of ACTEC Trust and Estate Talk, the podcast series about wealth planning matters from the American College of Trust and Estate Council. To find an ACTEC lawyer near you, visit actec.org Please subscribe to this series and leave us a rating or a review.
Podcast: ACTEC Trust & Estate Talk
Host: ACTEC Fellow Travis Hayes
Guest: ACTEC Fellow Wendy Goff
Date: January 26, 2026
This episode explores “useful but overlooked” trusts—specialized estate planning tools that are often missed but can be invaluable in the right situations. Host Travis Hayes and guest Wendy Goff examine nuanced trust structures, including Health and Education Exclusion Trusts (HEETs), alimony/maintenance trusts, voting trusts, and blind trusts. The discussion includes detailed explanations, key considerations for use, and practical applications for clients seeking more advanced planning.
On the purpose of specialized trusts:
“Sometimes estate planners need to step outside the usual toolkit and consider more advanced, under the radar trusts.”
— Travis Hayes, 00:38
On trust formalities:
“A trust is not a legal entity, title to assets should be held by the trustee, not the trust.”
— Wendy Goff, 01:18
HEET requirements:
“The catch is that the trust must also provide for charitable distributions in a meaningful way.”
— Wendy Goff, 04:01
On voting trusts' strategic value:
“Voting trusts may also be used to implement multi-generational planning strategies, which are particularly valuable for family businesses, where ownership may be distributed among multiple family members with varying levels of business involvement and expertise.”
— Wendy Goff, 08:28
Future of trusts:
“As we look to the future, we’re seeing fascinating emerging structures... personal revival trusts for cryogenic preservation, trusts for cryptocurrency and NFTs... trusts designed to hold social media accounts and digital personas.”
— Wendy Goff, 09:19
Practical, highly specialized, and informative, with an emphasis on actionable insights for estate planning professionals. Wendy Goff’s explanations are detailed yet accessible, focused on describing not only how these trusts work, but also their practical uses and important pitfalls. The episode balances technical accuracy and future-looking curiosity, encouraging listeners to update their trust-planning repertoire.