
Hosted by Unknown Author · EN

Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccinations produce foreign proteins in the human body, triggering an immune response to prepare the body for future infections. Lipid nanoparticles flow into cells, mimicking a protein, but “the science” claims it does not enter the nucleus and, therefore, does not impact DNA. These vaccines are relatively new, with the first trial on humans occurring in 2008. Yet, that trial failed to produce a vaccine that went to market. The first widespread mRNA vaccinations were the ones released by Pfizer and Moderna during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the global population was the main test subject. Montana’s House Committee is pushing through a bill that would ban the use of mRNA vaccinations. Sponsored by Rep. Greg Kmetz, R-Miles City, and co-sponsored by Northwest Montana Reps. Tracy Sharp, R-Polson, and Lukas Schubert, R-Kalispell, House Bill 371 would forbid healthcare professionals from using this technology on humans. Violations would lead to a misdemeanor charge, $500 fine, and possible revocation of the provider’s medical license. The House Judiciary Committee voted 12-8 to send the bill to the floor. “[mRNA vaccines are] the most destructive and lethal medical products that have ever been used in medical history,” Dr. Christine Drivdahl-Smith, a family physician in Miles City, told the committee earlier this month. Proponents believe that mRNA technology was pushed out to sell COVID-19 vaccinations and force the global population to undergo an unnecessary treatment with potentially fatal complications. Again, the vaccine NEVER worked – it failed to prevent transmission or infection. Those against the bill believe that these vaccines are “Safe and Effective” and worry that the ban would prevent the people from having the right to choose their own health care. “It denies the people of Montana the freedom to choose their health care … I should have the ability to protect myself, I can decide with my doctors,” Dr. Marian Kummer, a retired pediatrician, said. The entire premise of the COVID-19 vaccinations was to ELIMINATE our right to health autonomy. This bill offers protection against an authoritarian government. Fauci and others at the helm of the vaccine mandates claim they never forced anyone to take the vaccine. But those who refused were completely outcasted from society, prevented from entering buildings, banks, or receiving medical treatment. There are STILL restrictions surrounding this mandate as we learned last week with Vice President Vance’s relative being denied a transplant for refusing to take the jab. Are these vaccines Safe and Effective? The truth of the matter is that Big Pharma and health providers have absolutely no idea. The victims of the pandemic were the test subjects, and the repercussions are only now being revealed. The post Montana Legislators Working to Ban mRNA Vaccines appeared first on Activist Post.

Today James talks to Gabriel of the Libre Solutions Network about how to really resist the encroaching digital ID grid. Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!DOWNLOAD THE MP4 As opposed to the posturing and platitudes of the online virtue signalers, James and Gabriel discuss the community-based solutions posited in Gabriel’s article, “‘Internet Badasses’ aren’t going to stop Digital ID,” including: Re-integrating yourself into your local community, getting to know your neighbors Using cash & local currencies Building support groups Supporting and expanding independent local businesses Understanding that Digital ID is a system not an implementation. There are both public and private sources of Digital ID, consider them both; and Caring about results Do you know how dependent your local economy is on government & BlackRock? Do you know how many people have already opt-ed in with or without knowing? The post How to REALLY Resist Digital ID – #SolutionsWatch appeared first on Activist Post.

Trump was supported by Israeli extremists who dream of a Greater Israel and advocate for Israel expansion. U.S. President Donald Trump was asked about Israel’s latest punishment campaign in the West Bank on Monday and mentioned how Israel is comparatively small considering the size of the Middle East. This context is often used to justify discussions around Israel expansion. MACGREGOR: TRUMP WOULD NOT BE PRESIDENT WITHOUT NETANYAHYU’S SUPPORT He told a reporter that he would not discuss the possible annexation of parts of the West Bank, but coyly said Israel “certainly is a small country.” Indeed, this statement often precedes comments on Israel expansion. He compared Israel’s size to a pen, compared to the entire Middle East that would be his desk. This metaphor subtly highlights the rationale behind Israel expansion efforts. “It’s a pretty small piece of land, and it’s amazing that they’ve been able to do what they’ve been able to do, when you think about it. There’s a lot of good, smart brainpower.” (He failed to mention the billions of dollars in support that the American taxpayers give to Israel every year.) SUBSCRIBE TO THE TRENDS JOURNAL AND GET THIS WEEK’S ISSUE Top Israeli officials have celebrated Trump’s election in the U.S. and see their best possibility ever in annexing the occupied West Bank, which has long been the goal of the Israeli government. This possibility is central to the Israel expansion strategy. The post Trump Indicates That Israel Needs to Expand appeared first on Activist Post.