Loading summary
A
You are listening to Adorama narrated a collection of our favorite blog posts, presented in audio format. Trust in Transparency A New AI Disclosure law is Coming to New York State Written by Jacqueline Tobin, published on June 5, 2026 when listing recent AI generated advertising misfires, a few high profile examples come to mind. This includes Meta's AI granny, HM's digital twins, and Coca Cola's glitch filled reboot of its classic 1995 Holidays Are Coming campaign. Many viewers found a satirical AI generated ad from McDonald's Netherlands more creepy than clever. Additionally, many criticized a Valentino luxury handbag campaign as tacky and unsettling. All of these sparked some degree of backlash. Consumers may be willing to tolerate some uses of AI in advertising. However, they have shown far less patience for campaigns that feel deceptive, inauthentic, or poorly executed. Awkward AI generated faces and unrealistic imagery make them question what is real and what is not. That growing skepticism is helping fuel a broader movement toward transparency in advertising. This movement has found its way into law in New York State. Advertisers who use synthetic performers beware. Reckoning day is coming. Beginning June 9, New York's synthetic performer disclosure law, S8420A, takes effect. Signed by Governor Kathy Hochul in late 2025, it requires advertisers to clearly disclose when synthetic performers are used. The same is true for AI generated people. Violations can result in fines of $1,000 for a first offense and $5,000 for subsequent offenses. The law applies to advertisements distributed to New York audiences. It applies regardless of a company's headquarters. This marks a significant shift in how brands may use artificial intelligence across email campaigns, social media advertising, and other digital marketing channels. When asked about the new law, attorney Aaron M. Arce Stark, whose client base includes creative professionals, expressed relief that lawmakers are beginning to address the rapid expansion of AI generated content in advertising and digital media. As AI generated people become nearly indistinguishable from real humans, these disclosure laws are becoming less about the technology itself and more about transparency and trust, unquote, he explains. For photographers and visual creators, rules like this may help preserve the value of authentic human created imagery in an increasingly synthetic marketplace. Ultimately, the goal is to prevent consumer deception as synthetic media becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish from traditional photography and video. United We Stand Other States Join a Broader Framework New York is not alone. While its first of its kind law focuses specifically on transparency and disclosure when these synthetic performers are used in advertising campaigns, other states are pursuing broader AI transparency and accountability measures. In March 2026 California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Executive Order N5.26 building on the state's evolving AI regulatory framework, including the Transparency in Frontier Artificial intelligence Act, or TFAIA, scheduled to take effect in August 2026, according to the California Executive Department. The order expands upon existing efforts to promote watermarking and provenance metadata for AI generated content while establishing guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI by state agencies. Taken together, New York's law and California's initiatives suggest that AI disclosure is evolving from a niche concern into a broader regulatory expectation. Other states are moving or have already moved in similar directions. Tennessee passed the ELVIS act in 2024, protecting voices and likenesses from unauthorized AI replication, particularly for musicians and performers. Illinois has enacted new rules requiring informed consent for digital replicas when they are used in place of a performer's work. Washington State has adopted laws addressing digital likeness protections and AI disclosure. Colorado continues developing broader AI governance and accountability frameworks that may affect businesses using AI systems, according to media and events company Ad Exchanger. Florida, Hawaii, Indiana, Idaho, Michigan, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin have already passed or are considering AI related disclosure requirements, particularly for political advertising. The direction is becoming increasingly clear. The question is no longer whether brands can use AI in advertising, but whether consumers are clearly informed when they do. Now celebrities are registering their likenesses the push for transparency is also intersecting with another growing AI impersonation. Beyond disclosure laws, celebrities are increasingly taking steps to protect their names, images, likenesses, voices, and other distinctive personal attributes through intellectual property and publicity rights protections. Several public figures have registered elements of their identity with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including distinctive catchphrases, gestures, and vocal characteristics. For example, Matthew McConaughey has registered a soundmark covering the phrase all right, all right, all right in his own voice, along with protections for elements of his image and Persona. Federal trademark registrations can provide more uniform and broader enforcement rights across the US for distinctive elements of a celebrity's name, image, and likeness, unquote, says Donna Tobin, chair of the intellectual Property group at Royer, Cooper, Cohen and Braunfeld. Federal registrations can also strengthen takedown requests made to social media platforms. These efforts reflect a larger reality. Quote as AI generated content becomes more convincing, both lawmakers and individuals are seeking new ways to establish authenticity, ownership, and trust in digital media. No generated people or bodies an ongoing commitment to non AI advertising. As lawmakers, performers, and public figures push for greater transparency and control over AI generated likenesses, brands are also recognizing that consumers increasingly value authenticity over synthetic content. For some companies that has meant not only disclosing AI usage but but publicly pledging to avoid AI generated people altogether. One of the most prominent examples came in April 2024 when Dove committed to never using AI generated women in its advertising as part of its long standing real beauty platform. The company stated that it would continue featuring real women in its campaigns, avoid digital distortion, and never replace people with AI generated imagery. Dove reaffirmed that commitment in 2025. Since then, brands including Arri, Polaroid, Nintendo and others have made similar commitments. On the flip side, brands including Nike, Heinz, Adidas, Virgin Voyages and Mint Mobile have disclosed their use of AI synthetic performer campaigns. These pledges come as consumer skepticism toward AI generated content continues to grow. A Gartner Marketing survey conducted in October 2025 found that more than 68% of U.S. consumers frequently question whether online content is genuine, particularly when AI and synthetic media are involved. Quote the combination of AI generated content and synthetic media is creating a high risk landscape for brands making unsubstantiated claims. Unquote, it concluded the bottom line on AI generated advertising. The bottom line AI itself isn't necessarily the problem. What consumers seem to object to is feeling misled. That's why, after the Gartner survey, it was recommended that marketers treat AI as a trust issue as much as a technology issue, making its use transparent, optional and clearly beneficial to consumers. As AI generated content becomes more common and harder to detect, the brands that are upfront about how they use it may be the ones that earn the most trust. And with New York's new law imposing fines on advertisers that fail to disclose the use of synthetic performers, transparency is quickly becoming more than a best practice. It is becoming both a business and legal necessity. This has been trust in Transparency A new AI disclosure law is coming to New York State, Written by Jacqueline Tobin Read for you by Nikki Haller for more posts like this, check out the 42 west blog at adorama.com blog links are in the show notes. Be sure to follow adoramannarrated on your favorite podcast app and leave us a review if you enjoy the content. Remember, create no matter what.
Date: June 7, 2026
Host: Adorama Narrated
Writer: Jacqueline Tobin (original article)
Reader: Nikki Haller
This episode delves into the rising need for transparency in AI-generated content within advertising, spotlighting New York State’s new AI disclosure law set to take effect on June 9, 2026. The discussion explores the broader national trend toward AI regulation, the implications for advertisers, celebrities, and visual creators, and the growing consumer demand for authenticity in a synthetic age.
[02:05]
"As AI generated people become nearly indistinguishable from real humans, these disclosure laws are becoming less about the technology itself and more about transparency and trust."
([03:42])
[05:12]
"The question is no longer whether brands can use AI in advertising, but whether consumers are clearly informed when they do." ([07:22])
[08:03]
"Federal trademark registrations can provide more uniform and broader enforcement rights across the US for distinctive elements of a celebrity's name, image, and likeness." ([09:15])
[10:03]
"The combination of AI generated content and synthetic media is creating a high risk landscape for brands making unsubstantiated claims." ([12:22])
[13:15]
Aaron M. Arce Stark, attorney:
"As AI generated people become nearly indistinguishable from real humans, these disclosure laws are becoming less about the technology itself and more about transparency and trust."
([03:42])
Donna Tobin, IP Lawyer:
"Federal trademark registrations can provide more uniform and broader enforcement rights across the US for distinctive elements of a celebrity's name, image, and likeness."
([09:15])
Podcast narration:
"The question is no longer whether brands can use AI in advertising, but whether consumers are clearly informed when they do."
([07:22]) "The combination of AI generated content and synthetic media is creating a high risk landscape for brands making unsubstantiated claims."
([12:22])