
Loading summary
A
Joe, it's been a minute. Welcome back from Europe.
B
Well, thank you. I made it back safely. The Christmas markets, however, are devastated. I'm gone because I felt like between my mom, my spouse and I, the GDP of the EU is going to be just fine.
A
You are single handedly responsible for GDP growth in the eu.
B
When you come home with seven of those Christmas market mugs and you're like, why? Why seven? Why not one? But every single one you go to, you're like, oh, that's pretty too. You know what, we could just bring these out around the holidays because yeah, God knows I love to store crap for 11 months and bring it out for just one.
A
Well, you've got one mug for every day of the week.
B
That's good. It's like I'm. I'm starting my advent mug collection.
A
I don't. Beautiful.
B
Well, maybe. Hopefully not.
A
Well, speaking of days of the week, I don't know how to segue that. We've got some great callers today. That has nothing to do with days of the week. Welcome to the Afford Anything podcast. The show that knows you can afford anything. Not everything. The show covers five pillars. Financial, psychology, increasing your income, investing, real estate and entrepreneurship. It's double I fire. I'm your host, Paula Pant. I trained in economic reporting at Columbia. Every other ish episode, unless Joe's on vacation, I answer questions that come from you and I do so with my buddy Joe, who has been absent for a little. He's been. He's been traveling.
B
I have been.
A
Welcome back.
B
Thank you. I also kept up the dad jokes though, just for you. So you know what you call a paper airplane that doesn't fly?
A
What?
B
Stationary.
A
And with that we will hear our first question today which comes from Slade.
C
Hi Paula and Joe. This is Slade in Virginia. I have a few details I'd like you to hear to see if you can help guide me into the next steps or some reallocation of my brokerage account. My wife and I are both 44 years old and have an 11 year old daughter. In the next five to seven years, we are both looking to downshift in our careers or find something that pays much less. We'd like your thoughts on withdrawal order and allocation. We spend about $115,000 a year. Currently all of our tax deferred and tax free retirement are allocated in about 60% S&P 500 funds, 15% international, 15% small cap and about 10% mid cap. We have about $1 million in traditional retirement and $370,000 in Roth. We also have about $36,000 in HSA and $75,000 in 529S. Our taxable brokerage, however, is worth about 685,000 and is split between about 85% S&P 500 funds and 15% small cap over the next five to seven years. While we continue to work our current jobs that pay well if we want to live off our taxable brokerage after that, should we start to heavily work bonds into that allocation to de risk, should we consider a 72T looking for any guidance to help make this possible? Thanks so much Slade.
A
I love your question and first of all, congratulations on building such a healthy portfolio and on having such clear, well thought out goals. I love the foundation that you're starting with personally and Joe, we have not discussed this ahead of time, so I'm curious to see if we fall into the same camp here. I am actually not a huge fan of the 72T in Slade's situation because they have so much in taxable brokerage accounts and they've got enough time until their goal and their goal involves taking significantly lower paying work. But there's still going to be some income coming in and and their annual cost of living at 115,000. That's a very Given the balances that he's talked about and given the whole set of circumstances that I've just outlined, a fairly achievable number. Based on all of that, I'm not a huge fan of the 72T, I think I'd like to focus on the taxable brokerage portion. What do you think Joe?
B
I tend to agree. Here's the one piece of information slay that we don't have that would help me with 72T, which is when you talk about the difference between what you're making now and what your income stream is going to be later. I don't know what that delta is, so I don't know how much we're trying to take per year and I'll tell you why that's important is that when it comes to 72T, one fun reason to take 72T. I like working fun into 72T because anybody who knows this knows it's not that fun. But it gives you some opportunities for some clever financial planning. So if you use some software and you look out, you project out later on with your traditional retirement accounts, there are some hurdles that you're going to need to overcome later. Number one, there's going to be taxation of your Social Security and this just assumes things stay the same. Number two is there's this little thing that we probably won't get into today, but, but people should look it up called irmaa, which is another tax ish hurdle that can be caused by taking too much money out of your traditional retirement account. So what I get worried about, Paula, is that the traditional retirement account might grow too big. And if it does, we might cause some tax problems down the road by not tapping it. Now the cool thing with 72t is you can segregate your retirement account. So let's talk about what this is first. So 72t for people like what the hell are they even talking about? What this question revolves around is, should I take my money in traditional retirement accounts and tap it legally and without penalty before 59 and a half? People have probably heard that you can't do it before 59 and a half. Cool thing is you can, but you have to follow some specific rules. And basically what the IRS makes you do is turn it into a pension. And that pension has to run for at least five years or until 59 and a half, whichever is longer. So at 44 years old, if Slade goes at 50, Slave will need to continue to take this quote pension for nine and a half years for 10 years.
A
If you want a super deep dive into 72T, uh, go all the way back to episode number 94. That it's funny to state a two digit number now that we're at what, 600 and something. But if you go all the way Back to afford anything dot com. Episode 94, we do a deep dive into SCPP. 72T.
B
That's awesome. That's great. Well, and you know what's cool is it is like riding a bike. Once you know it. Once you know it, you got it. I mean, episode 94, it doesn't matter what episode number it is because it's a train thing that frankly probably doesn't need to be done.
A
Again, it's an evergreen topic, right? It's not like.
B
Well, that's what I meant.
A
Yeah, it's not like the first Friday macroeconomic episode when I'm, you know, here's the inflation data. You know, it's not something that changes every month. It's very steady.
B
You can tell I'm just back from vacation. I use 84 words. Paula uses two evergreen topic to explain the mess of words that I had just before that. But the deal is, is that, Paula, I think you could use 72T in a cool way. So what most people think with 72T and this is where people get it wrong, is that you got to take all your retirement accounts and turn into a pension. Well, what's cool is you can segregate your retirement accounts and only use a piece of it. So I could 72 t this one fund over here and not 72 t these other fund. That gives me the opportunity to build a small quote pension ish stream of income that comes out between now and age 60. I reduce my taxation after age 60 because I keep that retirement account value smaller, a little smaller. And I then am able to do some tax planning today, get the money that I need today. And that also leaves some of that brokerage money available for later, which is also pretty cool because that brokerage account represents flexibility. Now, like you, I don't think they're going to spend on all the brokerage account. I don't think they will. But I'd love to know how much money they think they're going to make. And use a conservative number, how much money you think you're going to make. And then maybe see about a hybrid of I'm going to spend most of the money through my brokerage account, but then I'm also going to because I did some projections of the future of how much money I'm going to have to take out of this later. If those numbers are problematic way down the road, I could do some cool planning at age 50 to lessen the load after 60. 65, 70, 75 years old.
A
Yeah. I mean, so fundamentally, right, they're 44 right now. They're talking about doing this within five to seven years. Let's split the difference and say six years. They do it at the age of 50. And we're trying to plug this nine and a half year gap from 50 to 59 and a half again with 685,000 in the taxable brokerage rule of 72. Assuming that the market does in the next six years what it did in the last six years, which we can't necessarily assume that, but there's a pretty good chance that that taxable brokerage account is going to be over a million by the time they turn 50, I think there's a reasonable likelihood that it'll be around a million dollars. And so we're trying to plug a nine and a half year gap with a million bucks in taxable brokerage when their annual spend is 115,000, adjust that for inflation by the time they turn 50. It seems like they can, especially given that even if they earned pretty small Incomes. Think they could do the whole thing out of taxable brokerage?
B
Oh, no, they could easily do it out of taxable brokerage. My question wasn't around that when I said I want to know what the delta is. My question is, how big do I make that 72t to avoid further taxation.
A
Further taxation down the road.
B
Let's be clear. I'm not worried at all about making it. Slade, you're going to be fine. You're going to be great. Love your allocation, by the way. The way it is right now. I think it's fantastic. We can talk about how you switch that over. But yeah, the 72T thing, I don't like doing it generally, but in this case, because also when you talk about the rule of 72, Paula, that 1 million in a traditional account by the time he gets to 59 and a half is also going to be double. Yeah, it's going to be two point something million dollars sitting there.
A
Yeah.
B
So if we go to tax expert, I mean, my friend Ed Slott wrote this book, you know, the tax time Bomb. I'm looking at this time bomb, possibly with that traditional retirement account. So I'm just trying to diffuse that bomb and use 72T that way. Now the good news, Slade, let's go through the good news. You could pay all these additional taxes and I think you're still going to be fine. So this is really much more advanced planning that we're talking about. Much more advanced tax planning we're talking about. You could do none of that and you're going to be okay. You're going to be fine. So then the question comes around. What are your legacy goals? What are your really beyond your lifetime goals with your money? And that's when, you know, financial planning gets even more exciting, Paula, because Slade and his family may be able to change the world.
A
The other thing to note, slade, your daughter's 11 right now. Six years from now she'll be 17. She'll be on the verge of moving out, going to college. Your annual expenses will likely drop at that time. I mean, your college expenses are going to be high, but the 529 covers that. But your day to day, the groceries, the amount of groceries that you have to put in the fridge, the cost of clothing, the cost of all of those miscellaneous daily cost of living items, a lot of that will likely shrink right at the time that you're making this transition. So I think it's wise to plan for your annual spending to remain at 115 where it currently is. But I think there's also a decent probability that that annual spend might shrink.
B
Yeah. Without any lifestyle change at all.
A
Yeah.
B
Without any meaningful feeling that it'll change.
A
Yeah. Joe, I know you experienced that when your twins went to college.
B
Oh, my God. When my son left home, my grocery bill just shrunk by so much. University of Texas had a food program along with his dorm. And when I saw that number, I laughed. I'm like, you're gonna lose. My son will eat that and more. What's amazing is for people that know him and you've met him, Paul, he's not a big dude. Not a big dude, but he. He could put it away in college. Of course, so could I. But that's a whole different story.
A
Yeah. The metabolism of an 18 year old.
B
Yeah.
C
Yeah.
B
So jealous. Now I look at a Cinnabon and I gain 10 pounds. Can we talk about the switch in allocation?
A
Yeah, let's do it.
B
There is this problem, Slade, that I think of as the bond problem. On one hand, you hit the nail on the head. You're reducing volatility. On the other hand, you're locking in much smaller opportunities for growth. And you're also creating some tax issues. If you just hit this straight forward. If you just change over some of your funds in your brokerage account to bonds, you create additional taxes and you lock in really suboptimal returns. The issue with bonds that I have is that whenever I think about a portfolio, I always think of bonds as something I'm trying to have as few of as possible, while also not wrecking my ability to meet my goals. I would want to talk more about risk tolerance here and how you react to changing markets. And based on your. Your current asset allocation, this money in the S&P 500 small cap to mid cap, like your diversification is, looks really good to me. Without doing a lot of analysis, just looking at it, I think it looks great. I do think that you need to back off. So your. Your gut feeling of, okay, the plane's coming in for landing, I need to back it down. I think you're right on there. But how much do we back down and how do we back it down? I think revolves, again, Paula, around whether he uses 72T, because if he uses 72T to defuse the time bomb, that money is going to be an income stream that he has to take. Then we can do some of this volatility lessening inside of his traditional retirement account, and then we end up with kind of the best of both worlds. Now, if we don't think there's going to be a huge tax bill. If he goes through and he does this research that I'm talking about and it's not going to be a big deal.
A
Right.
B
Then maybe I go ahead and I put bonds in the account. If we want it to be straightforward. We got a great call from Graham Slade. Hold on. Graham's going to explain this whole thing to you later on. Some foreshadowing of later in the episode.
A
Of later in the episode.
B
Yeah. Graham's going to give you kind of the 201 way you could do this and pay less tax. But straightforward wise, I didn't even know that's straightforward wise.
A
Boy, I'm straightforward wise. Yeah, sure, yeah, I, I declare that a word.
B
But to be straightforward about it means you're going to, you're going to run into some volatility issues. So let's go down the ladder first. The first thing you can do is traditionally value stocks have had less volatility than growth stocks. So without going all the way to bonds. Right. I could take more of a value oriented tilt because during lean years value stocks are going to go down less than growth stocks will. So remove some of the growth from your portfolio, go more toward a value bent. But we know, Paula, that utilities, utility stocks, much more conservative. But you don't have to play the bond game. When I look at sectors, the utility sector might be something that he looks at that's kind of a halfway. I don't, I see people go full force from stocks over to bonds. And I think you can do that with some money. But I think you can also lessen the blow by moving some of your stock allocation to a more conservative stock allocation as well.
A
Well, and I agree with you that the answer to 72T is going to play a big role in this because to your point, Joe, the drawback of 72T and the reason why I, you know, biased towards taxable brokerage, if you can do it from that, is because of the fact that there is a mandatory annual withdrawal. And whenever you're in a situation where you lack flexibility, you have to curtail your investments and you have to invest a little bit more conservatively because you lack that flexibility, you know, versus just hypothetically, if your strategy was entirely to pay for your cost of living through a combination of lower paying work plus withdrawals from the taxable brokerage account. But you could adjust on an annual basis, you know, maybe there are some years that you make more than you did the previous year. There are some years where maybe there's a year where you decide that you want to spend that time in Bali where the cost of living is a heck of a lot cheaper. And so you're going to have this dynamism both in your compensation income and also potentially in your expenses. Right. There's going to be annual fluctuation there as there is for most people. And so with a taxable brokerage strategy, you have the, the freedom and the flexibility to modulate accordingly. And with a 72T strategy, you have to take at least some port. Whatever portion that is, what that number will be is based on a huge variety of factors. Whatever that number is, you're going to have to take it out every year. And because that is a must and that is a non negotiable, regardless of what is happening in your life, you do have to invest more conservatively because you don't want to be drawing down from a 2008 scenario.
B
The cool thing is, and this is what people don't know about 72t is I can make that number fairly small.
A
Right? Right.
B
That 72T doesn't have to be as huge as people think. I said 72T on a 2 million dollar IRA. Oh my God, that's going to be just a monster amount of money. And I don't, I don't, I don't need to take all that money out. Well, you don't have to. That's the cool thing here. So, yeah, if we have more of a trickle from the faucet than this huge 72t, I'm all in favor of that.
A
You know, I think a good asset allocation example are foundations, charitable foundations. They are required. The ones that don't do any active work, the ones that are set up for the purpose of making distributions to other charities, they are required to distribute 5% per year. And because of that 5% distribution mandate, they have to invest accordingly. That's the model that comes to mind when I think about the 72T mandate.
B
Yeah, you'll automatically create kind of a two tier system inside of your traditional retirement accounts. You'll have some sliver of money that's made to continue to fund that. I need it now, machine. And then the rest of it goes to the far end of your timeline. This is the money that you're, you're letting grow. So it's funny because you'll have your most aggressive money and your most conservative money in traditional retirement accounts. But to get this done, you have to segregate the piece. That 72t money, it makes it much easier on your dashboard to know which part is the part I'm taking money from because I literally have to have a different IRA for the 72T money than the one that I'm not 72T. So dashboard wise, it's not that hard to to grok. But in, in your head you're like, I got my most conservative and my most aggressive money in the same what? Same tax treatment.
A
Yes, Slade, I hope that gives you some insight and some next steps. And again, congrats on everything that you've built. I'm excited for this chapter ahead, we're going to take a moment to hear from the sponsors who make this show a reality. And when we return, we're going to hear from David who's wondering which account to use first for college costs 529 or 457B. We're also going to hear from Graham who has some thoughts on bonds that actually relates to the question that we just answered from Slade this year. Give a gift that goes far beyond the moment. An Invest529 account. Whether it's a child, grandchild or someone just starting out, you're helping them save for education that can open doors for a lifetime. Invest529 is a tax advantaged way to help save for college, trade school or even apprenticeship programs. It's flexible, easy to start and you can contribute any amount, big or small because the money can grow tax free. It's a gift that can really build value over time. So instead of giving something that gets used up or set aside, give the gift that can change a Life. Start an Invest 529 account today. Go to invest529.com to learn more and get started. Investments involve risk. Results vary. Consult with your financial and tax professionals administered by Commonwealth Savers Plan. You don't have to let big wireless and your overpriced phone bill suck the joy out of the holidays this year because right now all of Mint Mobile Mint Mobile's Unlimited plans are 50% off. You can get 3, 6 or 12 months of unlimited premium wireless for 15 bucks a month. It's their best deal of the year and makes it real easy for you to give your expensive wireless bill the Scrooge treatment. Mint Mobile's best deal of the year is happening right now. You can get a 3, 6 or 12 month unlimited plan for 15 bucks a month. All Mint plans come with high speed data and unlimited talk and text on the nation's largest 5G network. You can bring your current phone and number over to Mint and there are no contracts. I've been using Mint for about five or six years. I used to be with a big name provider that shall remain nameless and I spent way more money at the time that I was with my previous provider. So in the five or six years I've been using Mint, I've saved hundreds upon hundreds, maybe even into the thousands into a four digit number. I've saved a lot of money by switching Mint. Turn your expensive wireless present into a huge wireless savings future by switching to Mint. Shop Mint unlimited plans@mintmobile.com Paula that's mintmobile.com Paula Limited time offer valid until February 4, 2026 Upfront payment of $45 for three month, $90 for six month or $180 for 12 month plan required $15 per month equivalent taxes and fees Extra initial plan term only over 35 GB may slow when network is busy. Capable device required availability, speed and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com hey folks, let me ask you a serious question. Did you know that driving high is considered driving under the influence? That's right. Driving under the influence of marijuana is against the law in every state. That means even in states where marijuana is legal, that means driving high could get you a dui. And if you think law enforcement officers can't tell when you're driving high, well my friend, you're wrong. If you're high, they can tell. Your friends can tell, your co workers can tell, even your parents can tell. Everyone can tell. What makes you think that law enforcement officers don't know when you're driving high? You'd be wrong. They can tell too. Driving under the influence of marijuana can slow your response time and change how you perceive time and speed. So even if you think you're fine to drive when you're high, you're not. The bottom line is if you feel different, you drive different. And driving high is driving under the influence. So remember, drive high. Get a DUI Paid for by NHTSA. Welcome back. Our next question comes from David.
D
Hey Paul and Joe. This is David down in Georgia. I have a senior in high school and I have a question regarding which of our accounts to draw from. First, with his educational spending currently have about $60,000 in a 529 plan. Additionally, my wife is an educator and we have about $200,000 in a 457 plan from a former employer. So theoretically we have access to that money. My question is, should we draw down on the 457B plan first and pay the little bit of taxes on those as that would be a taxable event, and grow the 529 so that that money could be passed on to our child's progeny should he have some, or should we draw off of the 529 plan first and avoid touching the 457 as long as possible? In theory, we have enough money in our other accounts based off of the great advice we've gotten from you and others in the community to where we don't necessarily need our 457 money for the purpose of retirement. But again, always nice to have options.
B
Thanks, David. Thank you so much for the call. What a great place to be. Impala. When we have this account from previous employer that we've done well enough saving that we don't need it. So it can be flexible money for education if we want it to be.
A
Right.
B
I'm actually going to answer this the opposite way of the way that I answered Slade's question. And the reason is, is I feel like the damage that it creates and the messiness that it creates when you tackle the 457 before the 529 plan outweighs any opportunity benefit that I see. So the first thing that I would do is spend the 529 plan. That's what the money's there for. That's what you saved it for. See how much of that you go through. The cool news is, is you know, you have a backup in that 457 money that you don't need. So the college fund is the college fund. Spend the college fund. I'll tell you what really bothers me, Paula, is if they go with the 457 money first, you know, besides the wonkiness of trying to get money out of what is traditionally known as a retirement account to spend for college, having 529 money left over afterwards. Yeah, okay, I can turn into Roth money if I don't spend it, but I don't see a reason to do that. If we empty out the account, the goal's over, done, goodbye. Don't have to worry about 529 at all anymore.
A
Okay, I'm going to take the opposite argument, but I'm curious to Hear your reasoning. 457 money, once you've left the job, you can withdraw it at any time. So why wouldn't you? You know, they've got this bucket of money in the 457 that they don't need for retirement. I'm going to take that statement at face value. I'm going to trust that they've run the numbers and they know that they don't need this bucket of money for retirement. So why not take it and let the 529 become essentially part of the legacy that they pass on to their grandkids? You know, like a family educational trust type of a thing.
B
Why wouldn't you do that with the 457? I mean, the 457. The cool thing is, is that you can put just. Your son is the beneficiary. Okay, Done. And we have no tax bill at the end of it, like he will have if he takes it out during his lifetime. I have no reason to touch the 457. Money versus the 529. The 529 is built for college. Use it for college. Get it done with the cool news is this. This, I guess, is the heart of it then, which is 457. Money is so flexible, and you can leave it in your name, and you can use it for life changes. I mean, things happen. My uncle just died the last year and a half of his life. He needed a bunch more care. I mean, I'm at the stage of life where I know a lot of old people, right. The. The generation ahead of me is going through those final years, and there are so many expenses that we don't know about. And so if you get to that point in life and, you know, you still don't need the money, your kids are still at an age. Your son is still at an age where he'll appreciate the fact that you can give it to him during your lifetime. I've had some family members that we've been lucky enough that have done that with us. And it's cool to give money to people when they're alive, but without David going into more about his personal funds and how close he might be, sure, he might be fine, and he's gonna be okay. But if the what ifs in life and life changes enough that he's not okay. And I already King Leared that money away to my kid.
A
This is your second King Lear reference on this show in the last month.
B
You're welcome. But if I've already. If I've already done.
A
Spoiler alert. Spoiler alert on King Lear. King Lear. I. I hate to spoil Shakespeare for those of you but did not get taken care of.
B
It doesn't end well for King Lear. Yeah, but if I give that money away and then I end up needing it later, I mean, I could do the same thing with a 529 but why do I have the 529 still sitting around? Then I got the same rando problem, but it's even more rando because that was college money. Okay, so why is your college fund still sitting there? Well, because I decided to use this excess retirement money that I had because I don't need it anymore. Now I do love the idea, David, of the 529 being a legacy like education, trust. I think that is really cool. In fact, I don't even know, Paula, that we needed this ability to change it over to the Roth ira. I can make a lot of arguments about there was already enough flexibility built in, but whatever, I'm not the government. My job is just to help you figure out the way things are now. So I do love that ability to do that. And if there's money left over, then you can still do that. But you can also do it with a 457. And the cool thing is with that beneficiary option on that account, you can do it very easily. If you pass away, you can do it during your lifetime. If you decided to do it earlier, you still have all the same stuff. And the cool thing about the 457 is I have a lot more options for investing it than I do in a 529. Like 529 plans have some cool options, but they're generally limited because of the fact that people are looking at one specific goal. So I can get a little more creative around the four 50s. I just think there's a lot more reason to keep the 457 than there is to keep the 529.
A
I do appreciate that the 457 has more flexibility and also that your costs in retirement. We kind of touched on this with Slade's question, but your costs over the span of your life are highly dynamic. And sometimes bills pop up, particularly around medical care, long term care, activities of daily living. Bills will often pop up in your final years that you might not have anticipated because your, your care needs can be so much greater. And I think that is just stepping back from this question and going to a big picture philosophical stance on retirement planning. I think the greatest threat to any retirement plan and the greatest challenge of good retirement planning planning for those final years. So I do appreciate that if he can fund his retirement out of these various other accounts and keep the 457 as a in case of emergency break glass account with the idea that that account will then pass on to his son if he ends up not needing it. Okay. I definitely appreciate the retirement planning flexibility in that. That being said, when it comes to legacy planning, I think one of the fundamental key questions is, does he want this 529 money? Like, does he want to pass something down to his grandchild rather than his child? You know, does he want it to make sure essentially that there's money that's set aside for that grandchild? Because if it's 529 money, he knows it's going to be spent on educational purposes, or it is likely to be spent on educational purposes once his son is done with education that would go to a grandchild versus if his son inherits the 457 money, his son could spend it on whatever, you know. So essentially the. I'm being a little bit wordy now, but essentially the question is how strongly does he want to create a family educational trust and name a grandchild rather than a child as the beneficiary? And he can't literally name a grandchild right now because that grandchild doesn't exist yet, and you can't name a beneficiary who does not yet exist. So this would be a. An indirect way to do that, which.
B
Brings up the question, the son is a senior in high school. Maybe there is a grandchild. I'm going to never know that. But if there isn't a grandchild yet, and let's say there never is one, if there's a grandchild now, and that is the goal, then certainly. Paula. I'm in. I'm in. That's great. Because my, my goal is to give something to my grandchild.
C
Yeah.
B
We can take care of your. Your kids situation with the 457money. We got the 529, which is designed for this legacy education thing.
C
Yeah.
B
Okay. Now I'm using the account the way it was designed. You know what's cool about this? This is what's really cool about this, David, is that I don't know there's a wrong answer to your question. I truly don't think there is a wrong answer. And I think that Paul and I have explored both sides of the argument, and you probably know, based on what you just heard us go through, which way you're thinking about more. The good news here is I don't think there's a ton of pressure on you to get this one 100% right. And that's the cool thing about having that 457 in place.
A
Yeah.
B
Is that I think you can go either way and you're going to be okay. That said, I'm probably. Right.
A
I actually, I do agree with that. So many of the arguments that I've put forth have been for the sake of playing devil's advocate in order to work through the problem, but given my predisposition to be extremely worried about end of life care. Yeah, I do like the idea of the 457 being the in case of emergency break glass fund for end of life care purposes. Because sometimes you get to retirement and realize, you know, the Travel in your 60s discretionary take it or leave it, depending on how strongly you want that. For many people that might be take it or leave it.
B
Right. This is Paula, I mean, let's give a real world example of somebody that you and I know and you're afford anything audience has met in a previous episode, our friend Paul Merriman. Paul Merriman has said, and Paul's an older, incredibly dynamic dude. Paul has said in years, when the market goes down, he then just explores the Pacific Northwest where he lives because then he doesn't spend as much money. He still gets to see some cool stuff. And in years when the stock market does really well, back when he was a little younger, he and his spouse, they would then travel the world during those years. So to your point, specifically using a specific, we've seen this work for somebody in action. But the thing that Paul doesn't know about is medical care. And he can't say, well, if the stock market does really good, I'm going to use great medical care.
A
Right. And if the stock market does poorly, I'm going to be rationing my prescriptions.
B
We call it micro dosing.
A
Oh, This just got dark.
B
That is just horrible. But to your point, there's a big difference. And you know, in the world of financial planning, what you're looking for are periods of your life when there's huge amounts of volatility. There's huge amounts of volatility right out of college or right out of high school because you, you know, the future is very uncertain. Your income streams are very uncertain, and you haven't yet established a spending pattern for yourself. So a lot could go off the rails. And then you get more established, you get more set in your ways, you're able to develop some planning. And then you go through these years when things are not that volatile. When you have a job change, things get volatile again. If you decide to turn a significant other into a spouse, things get volatile again.
A
If you have a pet who needs a lot of veterinary care and you don't have pet insurance, things get very volatile again.
B
Well, Then anytime a family member, including a pet, happens, things get volatile. So you look for these periods of volatility and how am I going to plan for those? And one period of volatility we know for certain is end of life care. You can just look at all of the statistics around the health care industry and, and who most of the care goes to and where most of the dollars go. And it's people that are within five years of the end of their life. That's when the vast majority, where the vast majority of money is spent. And so that's the period where in financial planning, I'm almost like, I don't know. I, I, I don't know. I mean, we all hope that we go quickly, right? There's another spoiler alert, not just the King Lear one. Spoiler alert. None of us get out of here live. I don't know if it's too soon.
A
Death, death and taxes to give that away.
B
But, David, great question, great thought exercise, and I loved working through it.
A
What a depressing answer we gave him. Well, we're all gonna die. You've got a lot of bills to pay, and it culminates in death. There's your answer.
B
David. Here's some fodder for the therapist, right?
A
Welcome to the Little Miss Sunshine podcast.
B
On that note, happy holidays.
A
Well, on that note, should we listen to some ads? Oh, yeah. Is that what we do next?
B
I think that's the best part.
A
All right, well, David, thank you so much for the question. I hope we gave you some food for thought and some insight. Next, we are going to ignore our impending mortality by listening to some words from our sponsors. Close your eyes. Exhale. Feel your body relax, and let go of whatever you're carrying today. Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-contacts. Oh, my gosh, they're so fast. And breathe. Oh, sorry. I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry. Namaste. Visit 1-800-contacts.com today to save on your first order. 1-800-contacts. Hey, what's up, y'?
B
All?
A
Kelly Clarkson with Wayfair. My favorite thing about the holidays, Decking out my whole house. It's not a competition. But if it was, well, I'd win the season with Wayfair outdoor inflatable Santa. Got it on Wayfair. Trees, lights and ornaments. Wayfair hosting must haves like dining sets, beds, sheets and towels. Wayfair for everything in your style delivered with fast and free shipping. Visit Wayfair.com or the Wayfair app to win the season. But again, it's not a competition. Wayfair Every style, every home Introducing Meta.
B
Ray Ban Display the world's most advanced AI glasses with a full color display built into the lens of the glasses. It's there when you need it and gone when you don't. Send and receive messages, translate or caption live conversations, Collaborate with Meta AI and more. Be one of the first to try MetaRayband display. Visit meta.com metaraybanddisplay to book a demo and find your pair.
A
Welcome back. Our final real comment today Not a question, but a comment. But a final fodder for discussion comes from Graham.
E
Hi Paula, this is Graham. I loved your recent episode about Brandon's question on holding bonds in his taxable account. You made a great point that since it's his only liquid account for the next 20 years, keeping bonds there makes sense for convenience. But here's the rub. In order for Brandon to diversify and add more bonds, he'll have to sell those beautifully appreciated stocks. And Uncle Sam will be waiting with a costly capital gains bill in hand. Here's a sneaky workaround. If he's also got a pretax retirement account, Brandon can sell equities inside the pre tax account and use that money to buy bonds. Boom. Instant diversification. Zero capital gains, and bonds are now tucked safely where they won't throw off taxable dividends every year. Fast forward to the next recession. Stocks drop, bonds rise, and Brandon wants to cash out some bonds. But wait. You say they're locked behind the age 59 and a half gate. No problem. We'll use the asset swap escape hatch. Let's say Brandon wants to withdraw $5,000 worth of bonds. Step one Brandon's going to sell $5,000 worth of equities in his taxable brokerage account and and withdraw the cash in his pre tax account. Brandon's going to sell $5,000 worth of bonds and use the proceeds to buy $5,000 of equities. Voila. He's effectively sold bonds and withdrawn $5,000, but his overall stock allocation across accounts hasn't budged. Even better, the IRS has no idea a financial magic trick has just happened. The same deal is true with dividends. When bonds in the pre tax account spit out $1000 in income, he buys $1000 worth of stocks there, sells $1000 of stocks in taxable brokerage, and withdraws it Creating tax efficient income without disturbing the asset allocation. So Brandon can diversify, rebalance and pull cash, all while dodging capital gains and dividend taxes. Hopefully this helps Brandon and others in the thanks again for the awesome show.
A
Paula and Joe Graham, thank you for the comment. Thank you for laying out the asset swap strategy. I love the strategy. It works under the following set of assumptions you mentioned. If there's a recession and there's a scenario in which stocks fall and bonds rise, which often but not always happens, and there have been times when equities and bonds have not been inversely correlated, but if there is a situation in which during a recession stocks fall, bonds rise and you want to rebalance your portfolio by virtue of selling out of some of that bond allocation and into buying more equities in a recessionary context, then yes, absolutely.
B
Well, it can also work for in Slade situation. So if Slade is trying to sell and doesn't want to to hold bonds in his after tax portfolio, he'd rather hold them in the pre tax portfolio. He's going to have to make a few moves instead of making just one. Right. You're not just selling and, and you can't set up just the automatic sale every month which a lot of retirees prefer to do. You can't do that. So it's a little more time intensive. But you certainly get the workaround that you're looking for.
A
And the beauty, Graham, of the strategy that you laid out is that a person pays less long term capital gains on the equities, the sale of those equities. And that means that you're getting a much better tax treatment than paying at the income tax level for dividends. So it does overall reduce your tax bill. So we like it. Seal of approval.
B
So the question becomes if we like it, why haven't we. Paula talked about doing this in the past and I can't speak for you, but, but I can certainly speak for me. Almost like the difficulty that we just had with the whole 72t discussion for Slade earlier today and how we get into some really advanced planning. What I found during my financial planning years is this, people will try to do the things that Graham said and behaviorally it becomes frustrating, it becomes time intensive. And I can hear Graham, I can hear you yelling at your device. It's not that time intensive. It isn't if you get it. But if you're somebody who's talking to a wider audience, what I often found was the wrong people would try to implement Graham's strategy. They're hanging on for dear life, when it comes to all these concepts, they hear about this, oh my God, I can save a bunch of taxes. This is the hidden thing I've been looking for. And then four months later, you're disenchanted, you're frustrated. You've no idea the hell that you created for yourself by having to set these things up on your calendar to do them all the time. And so you end up doing nothing. Which is the most frustrating thing for me because I think the whole goal, Paula, of the show is to help people do more, not to do less. And so I love this strategy. I think it's a great strategy. I do think that it's going to be something you're going to have to continually cultivate. Unless now, Graham, if you're just using it once a year for rebalance, then what's this extra step? It's no big deal. You know, then I think your strategy is no big deal. If I'm trying to take a monthly income stream like Slade's talking about. Yeah, I'm doing it swapping every month. Does it work? Yes. Is it a nightmare? 100%. Because 12 months a year I'm digging in, deciding what to sell in my pre tax and then what to sell in my, in my after tax. And I'll tell you, the other thing that ends up happening is that instead of just selling the obvious thing, this is when the market timing starts coming in, Paula, which is, oh, I have this position. It's quote, doing real good. Right. And I don't want to touch it this month. Even though on my plan it says to touch it. I'm just going to let my winner run a little bit or I'm just going to deviate this one time and you begin creating messes for yourself. Which is another reason I like automation. Unless I give my brain a chance to mess it up, the better off I'm also going to be.
A
Right.
B
I hope, Graham, though you hear that correctly, I don't dislike it. I think it's fantastic. And I think it solves the tax issue that a lot of people face, and specifically Slade, this is a strategy that might work for you depending on your ability to be able to do this on a recurring basis.
A
Yeah. You know, I think the reason that my brain immediately locked in on fast forward to the next recession is because that to your point, Joe, the effort burden of doing it once annually during a recession. Okay, cool. Not so bad. Assuming it's a recession in which stocks and bonds move inversely to one another.
B
Which doesn't always happen.
A
But assuming that that's how a given recession unfolds and you're doing this once a year, cool. But it certainly can become onerous if this is how you're paying yourself monthly, if you're relying on it for a monthly payout that covers your. Your cost of daily living.
B
Yeah. And I think about, even as we were talking about this, like, okay, so how do I mitigate all those risks? Like, if I set out once a year, a systematic approach of how I'm going to do this? So the only thing I need to do is a few more keystrokes, and I'm not going to think about it every month. I'm just going to do a few more keystrokes that could take this potential hassle and make it fairly, fairly quick and easy as well. But you definitely have to think around the system. What's my system going to be doing this versus every month? How am I magically evading the tax police?
A
I will also say, and. And Joe and I are both coming from the perspective of we hear the questions that we get from a wider audience, and we hear how those questions change depending on what's happening in the broader market. And of course, your individual behavior patterns will vary. But listening to a mass aggregate audience, no matter how many times we say time in the market is more important than timing the market, we say that till we're blue in the face. And yet every time something happens, we get calls from people saying, this time it's different. We heard it during the pandemic. We heard it this past April, April of 2025, when there was that very brief but pretty extreme market dip. We hear it over and over and over. And so we know from hearing the types of questions that we receive every time the market goes down that it is hard for many people to stay on track, stay on plan, when the reality of a diminished portfolio hits. When you log into that Vanguard account and you see the numbers, and they are much smaller numbers than what you're used to seeing, there is an emotional gut response. So much of what we do and what we talk about is, is to help people protect themselves from the downsides.
B
Of that, which often are behavioral. It's a reason why people inefficiently pay off debt. You're going to win because of the behavior change, not because of the interest rate. Mathematically, it's a bad move. Behaviorally, it's a fantastic move.
A
You're referring to the debt snowball?
B
Yeah.
A
Yeah. Behaviorally, it's a wonderful move that win that you experience when you pay off that smallest one.
B
It was also the number one reason, I think that people, when I was a financial planner hired me. Just the fact that we were going to check in four times a year and they were going to be physically in my office twice a year was this accountability pattern that behaviorally worked. You know, you'll see all day online, don't hire somebody, you can do this yourself, blah blah, blah, blah. I mean, I'm not going to go back through that diatribe. But I think the number one reason was because behaviorally if I've got a check in, if there's somebody holding me accountable, I'm going to do it. I talked about before, I'm planning for this race, this race in our community in Texarkana, half marathon to benefit our walking trails in town. We have a meeting every month. My job is to help with publicity. I will tell you, more gets done in the area of publicity the three days before that meeting than happens the 27 other days. So behaviorally, these check ins, these things matter. They 100% matter.
A
Yeah. I take stand up comedy classes every Wednesday night. You know, when I write most of my jokes. Wednesday afternoon.
B
Exactly.
A
Right.
B
Yeah. It's the reason people cram for a test.
A
Yeah, exactly. Because I know I'm going to class that night. I know I'm going to have to stand up in front of the class and do an act. And so every Wednesday evening I am standing up doing an act that I have just written and have not practiced. But I got it written. But thank you Graham for contributing to the conversation. I love the asset swap strategy. Let's continue the conversation in the broader community. Affordanything.com community is a great place to go to talk to like minded people about all of these topics and more. Totally free. Afford anything.com community. Joe, we did it again.
B
I can't believe it. Another one in the history.
A
Yes. All right. When you are not buying your seven day, your advent Christmas mug collection, if.
B
Somebody would like to take that off my hands, by the way, just write me, I will send you some Christmas mugs because I have 30. No, I have seven.
A
But when you're not importing mugs from where were you?
B
I was floating down the Rhine river.
A
Ah, nice.
B
I've started in Cologne and ended in Basel and went through Strasburg and a few small cities along the way. Just fantastic trip.
A
Oh beautiful, beautiful. Well, when you're back at home, where can people find you?
B
Well, even if I'm not at home, which I'll be home off and on. But the show must go on and it does. At Stacking Benjamin's we're at end of the year time which every year we have a few traditions. Number one is we have our fantastic roundtable with Paula, Jesse Kramer and OG Doug and I about what should we have learned from the events of 2025. The following Monday we always have guest from the personal finance community. It's been people like David Bach, Jill Schlesinger, Jean Chadsky. This year we have Joel and Matt from how to Money who are joining us. Yeah and the reason we have Joel and Matt on is because we kick their at a fundraising competition in November. So I just want to say that as well we have a lot of fun on that episode but we also get these wonderful guys take on what they think at the end of the year. Then we go into our year end holiday which we look back five years ago Paula and take our greatest hits from five years ago and play them every day during the week between Christmas and New Year's so people get to hear these fantastic interviews from five years ago. And we're going to replay our number one hit from 2025, which our most listened to episode was with Alex Haro. And on Christmas Eve we're going to replay our favorite yearly tradition, Doug and the Three Ghosts which is this totally story that I came up with myself with no help about how Doug gets visited by these three ghosts during the course of one night and it changes his life. Didn't no inspiration from anywhere in particular.
A
Do we have to spoiler alert this one.
B
So lots of holiday festivities happening at Stacking Benjamin's.
A
That's great. Well you can find all of that on the Stacking Benjamin's podcast. Thank you all for being part of this community. If you enjoyed today's episode, please do three things. First, subscribe to the newsletter afford anything.com Newsletter Second, open your favorite podcast playing app. Hit the follow button so you don't miss any amazing upcoming episodes. And third, while you're there, please leave us up to a five star review. F I R E five stars for five letters and five days of the week. Thank you again for being an afforder. I'm Paula Pat.
B
I'm Joe Salsihai and we'll meet you.
A
In the next episode.
Podcast Name: Afford Anything
Host: Paula Pant with Co-Host Joe Saul-Sehy
Episode Title: 44 Years Old, $2 Million Saved – Why They're Still Hesitant to Downshift
Date: December 16, 2025
In this episode, Paula Pant and Joe Saul-Sehy field audience questions on advanced personal finance topics, focusing on the “downshifting” decision once significant savings have been reached. They answer listener questions about withdrawal strategies, tax optimization, asset allocation (especially blending stocks and bonds), and inter-generational financial planning. The conversation is infused with humor, nuanced rationale, and relatable lived experiences.
Central Theme:
How to make smarter retirement and legacy planning decisions when you have a sizable nest egg but aren’t sure about the best way—or best time—to downshift from high-earning work, optimize portfolio withdrawals, and plan for future generations.
[01:48–21:10]
72(t) (SEPP) – Should Slade use it?
“Based on all of that, I'm not a huge fan of the 72T, I think I'd like to focus on the taxable brokerage portion.” — Paula [03:57]
“I think you could use 72T in a cool way...you can segregate your retirement accounts and only use a piece of it.” — Joe [07:09]
Why Consider 72(t) At All?
Withdrawal Order & Allocation:
“We're trying to plug a nine-and-a-half year gap with a million bucks in taxable brokerage...I think they could do the whole thing out of taxable brokerage.” — Paula [09:09]
“There’s also a decent probability that that annual spend might shrink.” — Paula [12:43]
Asset Allocation as Downshifting Approaches:
“Value stocks have had less volatility than growth stocks...utility sector might be something that he looks at.” — Joe [16:14]
Flexibility vs. Rigidity:
“Whenever you’re in a situation where you lack flexibility...you have to invest a little bit more conservatively...” — Paula [17:18]
[25:43–41:17]
Joe’s View—Use 529 First:
“College fund is the college fund. Spend the college fund...If you empty out the account, the goal's over, done, goodbye.” — Joe [27:13]
“Life changes enough that he's not okay. And I already King Leared that money away to my kid.” — Joe [29:12]
Paula’s Counterargument—Consider 457(b) First for Legacy:
“Why not take it and let the 529 become essentially part of the legacy that they pass on to their grandkids?” — Paula [28:33]
Shared Wisdom:
“I truly don't think there is a wrong answer. And I think that Paul and I have explored both sides of the argument...” — Joe [36:11]
“The greatest threat to any retirement plan and the greatest challenge of good retirement planning—planning for those final years.” — Paula [33:04]
[43:13–51:10]
On Downshifting and Withdrawal Anxiety:
“Slade, you're going to be fine. You're going to be great. Love your allocation, by the way.” — Joe [10:26]
On Advanced Planning vs. Simplicity:
“You could do none of that and you're going to be okay...So then the question comes around. What are your legacy goals?” — Joe [11:01]
On Late Life Financial Planning:
“I think the greatest threat to any retirement plan and the greatest challenge of good retirement planning—planning for those final years.” — Paula [33:04]
On Behavioral Reality:
“Time in the market is more important than timing the market, we say that till we're blue in the face...” — Paula [51:10]
| Timestamp | Segment Description | | ---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | | 01:48–21:10| Slade’s downshifting and withdrawal strategy | | 25:43–41:17| David’s legacy vs. flexibility question (529 vs 457(b)) | | 43:13–51:10| Graham’s asset swap comment and the hosts’ deep dive |
This episode is a master class in nuance: the hosts move beyond the “textbook” answers, showing how advanced tax and withdrawal strategies intersect with real-life uncertainty, values, and human behavior. If you have a solid financial foundation and want to optimize for both flexibility and legacy, you'll gain a wealth of practical, actionable insights.
No time? Here’s the takeaway:
Use accounts for their intended purpose, value flexibility, plan ahead for tax consequences, and always build contingency into your retirement cash flow models. And—above all—remember that the best strategy for you is the one you will consistently implement, even when life throws you curve balls.