Afford Anything Podcast: Q&A – Should You Keep Part of Your Money Outside the U.S.?
Host: Paula Pant (with co-host Joe Saul-Sehy)
Date: December 30, 2025
Podcast Network: Cumulus Podcast Network
Episode Theme: Listener Q&A – Portfolio efficiency, health insurance classification, and the prudence of keeping assets outside the U.S.
Overview
This episode of Afford Anything focuses on answering audience questions centered on three weighty topics: portfolio construction with an eye to the "efficient frontier," how to handle dependency status for adult children during transition periods (with health insurance and taxes in mind), and—most notably—whether U.S.-based investors should consider holding assets outside the United States for reasons of geopolitical, legal, or institutional uncertainty. True to the show’s character, the discussion is evidence-driven, practical, and full of accessible analogies, with both hosts regularly circling back to the true purposes of financial planning and risk management.
I. Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Portfolio Construction – The Efficient Frontier
[02:51-23:48]
Listener "Ally" asks several questions about asset allocation, rebalancing, backdoor Roth logistics, and efficiency.
-
100% Equities: Risk and Rewards
- Joe notes that many respected voices in finance argue for 100% equities as the fastest route to wealth, if the investor can stomach the volatility:
- “Number one, don't be afraid of the fact if you have the risk tolerance for 100% equities, that is fine.” – Joe [07:57]
- The real challenge is behavioral: the dangers of “jumping off the rollercoaster” at the wrong time due to market drops increases as the portfolio and stakes grow with age.
- Joe notes that many respected voices in finance argue for 100% equities as the fastest route to wealth, if the investor can stomach the volatility:
-
Defining "Efficiency" in Investing
- True efficiency starts with goals, not optimization for its own sake:
- "Efficiency truly is based on something, and in this case, Ally, it's based on what your goal is. When are you going to spend the dollar? I don't know any of that.” – Joe [09:13]
- Paula and Joe agree that clarity on end goals is needed before assessing portfolio efficiency or rebalancing.
- True efficiency starts with goals, not optimization for its own sake:
-
Issues in Ally’s Portfolio
- Heavy concentration in U.S. large-cap stocks due to “VTSAX & chill” approach; could benefit from more small-cap and international exposure.
- Good use of Roth accounts for highest growth assets—Paula agrees this is sound tax strategy:
- "You have a lot of your highest growth assets in Roth accounts, which are great..." – Paula [15:06]
-
Employer Stock Caution
- Large ESPP (employee stock purchase plan) position is a red flag; employees should avoid excessive exposure to single-company risk.
-
Rebalancing Without Taxes
- Joe: "You can't." Paula: Maybe, if you rebalance by buying in taxable accounts and only sell in tax-advantaged ones.
- Don’t let tax aversion paralyze you—cutting toxic positions and paying some tax is often the path to more wealth:
- “My goal is to have Elon Musk's tax bill.” – Joe [16:59]
-
Dividend Reinvestment Trick
- Paula’s strategy: stop automatic dividend reinvestment to create cash for rebalancing without triggering taxable sales. [18:11]
-
FIFO vs. LIFO for Tax Management
- “Which chipmunk are you getting rid of?” – Paula’s playful analogy clarifies why first-in/first-out or last-in/first-out matters for capital gains. [20:32]
2. Health Insurance & Dependency Status
[25:26-41:12]
Listener "Emma" asks whether her soon-to-graduate, 21-year-old daughter can be claimed as a dependent for half the year to qualify for better health insurance subsidies.
-
ACA Rules vs. Tax Dependents
- Under ACA, children can remain on parents’ plans until 26—regardless of dependency or marital status.
- “If it's an ACA compliant plan, then…a child under 26 can stay on their parents’ health insurance.” – Paula [27:03]
- Under ACA, children can remain on parents’ plans until 26—regardless of dependency or marital status.
-
Partial-Year Dependents – The “Residency Test”
- For IRS dependency, child must live with the parent over half the year or be a full-time student.
- Time away at university doesn’t count against residency.
- “The time that a full time student spends at school does not count against you for the residency requirement.” – Paula [29:55]
-
Alternative Health Coverage Arrangements
- Paula lays out options for 2026—including ACA compliant and non-compliant plans, direct primary care, and health shares.
- Warns about health share (e.g., Medishare) programs:
- “Right across the top of every single one of them, it says…not actuarially sound.” – Joe [33:49]
- Many have strict behavioral clauses or religious requirements.
-
Employer HSAs vs. PPOs
- Joe shares a listener’s story: often, for major U.S. employers, the HSA (with employer contribution and high-deductible plan) outcompetes the traditional PPO, even for those with higher medical spending.
3. Should You Keep Money Outside the U.S.?
[42:52-65:34]
Listener "Anonymous"/"Ted" asks about holding assets abroad, citing institutional trust issues and growing political risk in the U.S.
-
The Real Question: Which Jurisdictions Offer the Best Rule of Law?
- Hosts agree: the foundational concern is whether assets in the U.S. are more vulnerable to loss (seizure, arbitrary government action) than those abroad.
- U.S. remains the global standard for legal protection of property:
- “Look at how many assets have come from Norway to the U.S. in 2025—it’s incredible...The rule of law around property ownership is so strong.” – Paula [48:38]
-
Global Capital Flows
- Massive inbound U.S. flows signal broader confidence in U.S. protections, buttressed by opportunity (AI, capital markets).
-
Trading Risks, Not Eliminating Them
- Joe points out that any move to another country simply exchanges U.S. risk for a new set of risks.
- “You’re trading one risk of one government for risk of another government.” – Joe [47:22]
- Multinational tax, compliance, legal fees, risk of asset seizure, currency risk, and two different rule-of-law environments complicate the move.
- Joe points out that any move to another country simply exchanges U.S. risk for a new set of risks.
-
Costs and Practical Barriers
- Double taxation (U.S. taxes worldwide income and gains) and high cost for offshore custody or compliance.
- Most sophisticated solutions are only practical at the multi-million dollar scale.
-
Historical Self-Correction
- U.S. institutions have historically “self-cleansed”:
- “We have had scandals and changes...and it corrected. Maybe it didn’t correct quickly...but it changed course.” – Joe [50:05]
- U.S. institutions have historically “self-cleansed”:
-
Repatriation & Asset Seizure
- Even “legally” moving money abroad can expose it to successful future U.S. asset repatriation efforts if laws/rules change.
-
Diversification within Asset Classes v. Diversification of Legal Jurisdictions
- Paula and Joe agree: "geo-diversification" of where you hold assets is much less urgent for everyday investors than traditional asset-class diversification (international equities, bonds, real estate, etc.).
-
Risk Management—Probability vs. Magnitude
- Joe: True risk = probability × magnitude. While the magnitude of U.S. institutional collapse would be enormous, the probability, even as things look uncertain, remains extremely low.
- “It’s not even on the map of my top 25 worries about Ted’s portfolio.” – Joe [61:12]
- Joe: True risk = probability × magnitude. While the magnitude of U.S. institutional collapse would be enormous, the probability, even as things look uncertain, remains extremely low.
-
Final Recommendation: Not Worth It for Most
- Both hosts on (literal) record:
- “Are you for it or against it?...I am against it.” – Paula [54:40]; Joe agrees.
- Both hosts on (literal) record:
II. Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
Joe on 100% Stocks:
“The problem is you will jump off the roller coaster while it’s going down the hill and you will mess everything up.” [06:59] -
On Defining Efficiency:
"Efficiency begins with the end in mind...if you don’t know your goal, you can’t know if you’re efficient.” – Joe [09:13] -
On Tax Minimization:
“My goal is to have Elon Musk’s tax bill. ... My goal is more cash. And if I have to pay more tax to get that, then that is what it is.” – Joe [16:59] -
Asset Rebalancing as Chipmunks:
"Which chipmunk are you getting rid of first? Is it going to be Alvin or is it going to be Theodore?" – Paula [20:34]
(explaining FIFO vs. LIFO for capital gains, with Joe’s comic interjections) -
Health Shares Warning:
“...not actuarially sound...if your Medishare program gets into a situation where a ton of people need money at the same time, there’s not enough money in that pool...” – Joe [33:49] -
On U.S. Rule of Law/Diversification Reasoning:
"You’re trading one risk of one government for risk of another government." – Joe [47:22] -
On Asset Repatriation:
“If you legally move it to another country and the US government decides to go after your assets, could they repatriate it?...you might not be reducing the risk as much as you think you are.” – Joe [64:09] -
Comedy Callback:
Paula, on her comedy class progress, after making a joke about medical billing and deductibles:
“I've been taking stand up comedy for about a month now.” [55:29]
III. Timestamps – Essential Segments
- [02:51] Ally’s question about portfolio efficiency
- [05:24 - 12:11] Joe and Paula break down 100% equities, volatility, and risk tolerance
- [15:06] Discussion on large-cap concentration and Roth tax strategy
- [16:30] How to rebalance without incurring taxes
- [20:32] The “Chipmunk analogy” for FIFO/LIFO
- [25:26] Emma’s question: part-time dependency for health insurance
- [27:03] ACA rules for keeping adult children on health plans
- [29:55] IRS dependency “residency test” for students
- [33:49] Health shares: regulation, risks, and tradeoffs
- [42:52] Anonymous/Ted’s question: Should I keep money outside the U.S.?
- [48:38] Paula on U.S. global attractiveness and rule of law
- [50:05] U.S. history of “self-cleansing” institutional problems
- [64:09] On asset repatriation risk
- [54:40 & 54:41] Show of hands: Both hosts advise against offshore custody for most individuals
IV. Style & Tone
The episode maintains Paula and Joe’s signature conversational style: smart, friendly, full of analogies (“chipmunks,” “roller coasters,” “field goals”). Tangents include playful asides about long-term care TV comedies, comedy lessons, and meta-humor about performing visual gags on audio podcasts. The advice is always pragmatic, often coaching listeners not only on what to do but how to think about why they’re doing it.
V. Takeaways for Non-Listeners
- Don't obsess over portfolio “efficiency” until your goals are crystal clear.
- It's fine to be 100% equities if you truly understand and can handle the volatility. Most can’t (especially as stakes grow)!
- Don't let tax fears prevent smart rebalancing; use accounts and flows to minimize pain, but don’t let tax tail wag the dog.
- Children under 26 can stay on parental ACA plans regardless of their “dependent” status for taxes.
- Health shares are riskier than they seem—cheaper for a reason. Read the small print.
- Don't bother holding money overseas unless you are ultra high net worth and have exhausted more conventional forms of risk management.
- U.S.-based assets remain among the safest legally; moving elsewhere trades one set of uncertainties for another (often less favorable).
- Proper diversification means asset classes and geographies, not legal jurisdictions for most.
- Risk is always about probability and magnitude—save your energy for the risks most likely to impact you.
Listen for:
• Behavioral pitfalls of risk-taking
• Useful, witty analogies (chipmunks, roller coasters)
• A nuanced answer to a modern, global anxiety about U.S. institutions—delivered with both reassurance and realism
Summary prepared for Afford Anything listeners and the financially curious who didn’t catch the episode.
