Welcome to "AI Lawyer Talking Tech," the podcast that decodes the legal revolution happening right now. Generative AI is fundamentally reshaping the profession, promising to double, triple, or quadruple the legal market through massive efficiency gains and tools for rapid legal research and contract drafting. But this transformation comes with critical consequences, as demonstrated by two federal judges and numerous attorneys who faced sanctions after submitting opinions and filings containing "hallucinations"—made-up citations produced by these probabilistic models.

Team '25 Europe - Atlassian wants AI regulation. Its 80% adoption rate shows why that matters This article is sponsored by:
2025-10-24 | Diginomica

ARDC Releases the Illinois Attorney’s Guide To Implementing AI
2025-10-24 | Illinois State Bar Association

[Josh Blackman] Two Federal Judges Apologize For Issuing Opinions With AI Hallucinations
2025-10-24 | The Volokh Conspiracy

Courts Adapt to the Challenges of Generative AI
2025-10-24 | beSpacific

Hina Rizvi: “SongProof is giving artists back control of their music”
2025-10-24 | Eastern Eye

Scaling to $3B: How Clio Built a Vertical SaaS Powerhouse with AI and Innovation with CEO Jack Newton
2025-10-24 | SaaStr

Law Firm COO & CFO Forum: As legal market shifts, the big questions still need answers
2025-10-24 | Thomson Reuters

Should You Use AI to Write Your Will? Risks and the Future of Estate Planning
2025-10-24 | Herrington & Carmichael

Federal judges acknowledge court ruling errors tied to staffers’ AI use after Grassley inquiry
2025-10-24 | DNyuz

Supported How AI can help rather than hinder knowledge workers in the legal profession
2025-10-24 | ITPro.com

Smart Contracts: Between Legal Innovation and Uncertainty
2025-10-24 | The Impact Lawyers

The Verification-Value Paradox: A Normative Critique of Gen AI in Legal Practice
2025-10-24 | arXiv.org