'Taking Manhattan' Traces the Transfer of the City from the Dutch to the English

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Taking Manhattan" – Tracing the Transfer of the City from the Dutch to the English

Podcast Information

• Title: All Of It
• Host: Alison Stewart
• Episode: "Taking Manhattan" – Traces the Transfer of the City from the Dutch to the English
• Release Date: March 4, 2025
• Description: ALL OF IT explores culture and its consumers, engaging thinkers, creators, and the WNYC community in discussions about cultural phenomena and their underlying contexts.

---

Introduction

In the March 4, 2025 episode of All Of It hosted by Alison Stewart, the conversation delves into the intricate history of Manhattan's transition from Dutch to English control. The episode features Russell Shorto, renowned author of Taking Manhattan: The Extraordinary Events that Created New York and Shaped America, who provides a comprehensive exploration of this pivotal moment in New York City's history.

Setting the Scene: Dutch New Amsterdam

At the outset, Alison Stewart introduces the central theme of the episode—Manhattan in the 17th century. Russell Shorto emphasizes the often-overlooked nuances of this historical period, arguing that the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam retained a distinctly Dutch character even as it faced the impending takeover by the English.

Notable Quote:

"History, what's important in history is in those details." — Russell Shorto [02:42]

Shorto explains his motivation for writing Taking Manhattan, highlighting his fascination with the overlooked aspects of history that seem inevitable in retrospect. He draws parallels to his previous work, The Island at the Center of the World, and outlines how New Amsterdam thrived as a vibrant, multi-ethnic hub that puzzled the English.

Dutch Dominance and English Rivalry

The discussion shifts to the broader context of Dutch and English rivalries during the 17th century. Shorto portrays the Dutch as the more advanced "older sibling" in terms of global seafaring and trade, driven by their tolerance and multilingual capabilities. This environment fostered a unique cultural and economic landscape in New Amsterdam.

Notable Quote:

"New York was New York even before it was New York." — Russell Shorto [10:22]

Shorto highlights the diversity of New Amsterdam, noting that in 1643, as many as 18 languages were spoken among approximately 500 inhabitants, reflecting its status as a precursor to the multicultural metropolis we recognize today.

Slavery and Indigenous Dispossession

A critical aspect of New Amsterdam's history addressed in the episode is the role of slavery and the dispossession of indigenous populations. Shorto outlines the gradual intensification of slavery under both Dutch and English rule and underscores the systematic displacement of the Lenape people through deceptive land agreements.

Notable Quote:

"The whole process of the dispossession of native people across the continent begins here." — Russell Shorto [29:04]

Key Figures: Peter Stuyvesant and Richard Nichols

Central to the narrative are two pivotal figures: Peter Stuyvesant, the stern Director General of New Netherland, and Richard Nichols, the English commander tasked with seizing New Amsterdam. Shorto re-evaluates Stuyvesant's legacy, presenting him as a complex leader who, despite his initial rigidity, adapted to foster a thriving, capitalist community.

Notable Quote:

"He's a creative guy. His story is a complicated one." — Russell Shorto [14:23]

Nichols emerges as a strategic and pragmatic leader who, contrary to his mission, seeks a peaceful transition. Through negotiations, he ensures that the Dutch settlers retain their homes, businesses, and multicultural practices, setting the foundation for what would become New York City under English rule.

The Transfer: Negotiation over Conflict

Contrary to the anticipated violent takeover, Shorto describes how the English, led by Nichols, opted for negotiation rather than war. This decision was pivotal in preserving the colony's unique Dutch-influenced culture and establishing a legacy of tolerance and capitalism.

Notable Quote:

"If he didn't want to start over with a burnt out landscape, he decided to make a deal." — Russell Shorto [26:19]

The resulting Articles of Surrender were more akin to a bill of rights, allowing settlers to maintain their livelihoods and cultural practices under the new English administration, thereby ensuring continuity and stability.

Aftermath and Legacy

The episode concludes by examining the long-term impacts of the Dutch-English transfer. Shorto reflects on how this historical event laid the groundwork for New York City's enduring diversity and capitalist ethos. He also touches on the broader implications for indigenous and enslaved populations, highlighting the ongoing legacy of dispossession and inequality.

Notable Quote:

"Here were these two rivals who were ready to go at one another, and they stopped and they started talking. And they realized that there was an overlap, that there was something that they had in common, and that out of that you could build something new, something bigger than either of them could do on their own." — Russell Shorto [34:51]

Shorto emphasizes the importance of recognizing and learning from this capacity for negotiation and collaboration, which he believes is a vital lesson often forgotten in today’s societal discourse.

Conclusion

Alison Stewart wraps up the episode by promoting Shorto's speaking engagements and reiterating the significance of his work in shedding light on the foundational events that shaped New York City and, by extension, America. The episode effectively underscores the intricate interplay of culture, power, and negotiation that defined the early history of Manhattan.

Final Notable Quote:

"New York had two parents, one Dutch and one English. And it has features of both of them." — Russell Shorto [34:46]

---

Event Announcements:

• Russell Shorto at New Canaan Library: Sunday, March 9th, 3:00 - 4:00 PM
• Russell Shorto at South Street Seaport Museum: Monday, March 10th, 6:30 PM
• Russell Shorto at the Explorers Club: Thursday, March 13th

---

Additional Notes:

• The episode skillfully navigates through complex historical narratives, making them accessible and engaging for listeners.
• Shorto’s dual focus on storytelling and historical accuracy provides a nuanced understanding of the Dutch-English dynamics in 17th century Manhattan.
• The conversation sheds light on the often-overlooked aspects of colonial history, offering listeners a deeper appreciation of New York City's multicultural roots.

Transcript

[Progressive Insurance Ad]

All of it is supported by Progressive Insurance. You chose to hit play on this podcast today. Smart Choice. Make another smart choice with Auto Quote Explorer to compare rates for multiple car insurance companies all at once. Try [e-mail] Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates not available in all states or situations. Prices vary based on how you buy.

[Russell Shorto]

Listener supported WNYC Studios.

[Alison Stewart]

This is all of it on wnyc. I'm Alison Stewart. Coming up on the show tomorrow, we have more New York City history, this time with a focus on the water. We'll speak with some of the folks from the South Street Seaport Museum about the new exhibit Maritime City. And we'll speak with the author of the book Mood Machine about how Spotify has reshaped the way people listen to music, often in ways that disadvantage musicians. That's on tomorrow's show. Now let's get this whole hour started with Manhattan in the 17th century. In the new book Taking the Extraordinary Events that Created New York and Shaped America, our next guest, Russell Shorto, argues that Manhattan was taken twice. It was taken from the indigenous people who lived here, and then it was taken from one European colony and assumed by another as New Amsterdam became New York. Russell says that the colony maintained a distinctly Dutch character. That's part of what makes our city one of the most unique places on Earth. Enter England. They had most of the northeast on lock, but what about the territory that the Dutch maintained much past the current boundaries of New York City? That's the focus of Russell's book. Russell gives a detailed account of the days in 1664 when Englishman Richard Nichols faced off against Peter Stuyvesant, Director General of New Netherland. Russell Shorto is the author of the island at the center of the World. He is also the director of the New Amsterdam Project at the New York Historical Society. And he's agreed to stay with us for the whole hour today. In just a bit, we'll hear how the English convinced the Dutch to hand over New Amsterdam. But first, we're going to set up the conditions that led to the conflict. We also want to tell you this, that Russell will be appearing at the New canaan Library Sunday, March 9 from 3 to 4pm and he'll be speaking at the South street seaport on Monday, March 10th at 6. Welcome to the studio.

[Russell Shorto]

Thank you. Alison, what a great setup.

[Alison Stewart]

What are some of the key questions that you wanted to answer by researching and writing this book?

[Russell Shorto]

I'm interested in history that we overlook because we think it's inevitable. So that, okay, everybody knows that New York was once New Amsterdam. It was somehow controlled by the Dutch. And then of course, the English took it over and named New York. But, you know, that's like saying, of course the Allies won World War II. What if they didn't? I mean, history, what's important in history is in those details. So it, even among historians, this event has been glided over. And that very fact got me curious. What really got me into it though was as you mentioned, my earlier book, the island at the center of the World was really about the Dutch colony and that ends obviously with the takeover. And I based that research on translation project at the New York State Library in Albany, which has been going on since the 1970s. And what got me into this book was that translation project has finally moved into the latter years of the life of the Dutch colony. And as you get to that period, you see New Amsterdam at its full, at its height when it was this vibrant, multi ethnic place that was desirable to the English. So seeing that made me hone in on, okay, what was that moment that, you know, I focus on storytelling, I focus on people in conflict. And here you have the English in their ships pointing their cannons, and then the Dutch in their fort at the tip of the island pointing their cannon. I mean, that's conflict.

[Alison Stewart]

So the translations had that much different.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

In them, these new translations you came upon.

[Russell Shorto]

Well, it's not any one thing. It's an accumulation of information, of data, and this building picture of the city as it becomes, you know, it was like this little wild west post clinging to the southern tip of the island, basically the financial district today. But it had its, its very savvy traders, had contacts in the Caribbean, in South America, in Europe, in West Africa. And they were doing this and the English found this. They were bewildered by it. They couldn't find. Figure it out.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

The British Empire was powerful in 17th century, but the Dutch, I mean, they had a wide ranging wealthy empire in part due to their shipbuilding. Why were the Dutch so far ahead of the English?

[Russell Shorto]

They were. The Dutch. And the English are really interesting in the course of this, of the 17th century, because I often think of them as sibling rivals. They had a lot in common. The Dutch were ahead. They were like the older sibling and they were ahead. They had just gotten the jump on the English. They were always a, a seafaring people. They were then therefore always more globally minded, which had something to do with Dutch tolerance, Which, and you have to immediately qualify, it's. Dutch tolerance does not apply to enslaved Africans and they enslaved many or to native People and so on. But it was a thing. And it had to do with the fact that they had to learn other languages. And with that comes some perspective on other ways of living.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

The Dutch East India Trading Company. How does that factor in?

[Russell Shorto]

The Dutch East India Company is interested in the East Indies, which in the parlance of the day means Asia. They were looking for a short route to Asia. They hired an English navigator, Henry Hudson, in 1609.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Oh boy. That guy.

[Russell Shorto]

Yeah, that guy. And so when he came to North America looking for, he thought there would be a channel that cut through the North American continent. He also thought the North American continent was about half the size that it is. So he, according to his logic, instead of getting to Ohio, you'd actually get to the Sea of Japan and the riches of Asia would be in front of you. So doing that, that was his reason for being here. So he's checking out Delaware Bay and the Delaware River. That's not it. Then he comes up to later New York harbor and the river that's named after him and he thinks, aha, this is it. Because the Hudson river is, it's salty, it's an estuary. And he starts going up it thinking it's gonna cut westward. Instead he realizes that he's getting to the root of the river and he ends up turning around and going back. But he claims all of this on behalf of the Dutch who hired him.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

What were the stated goals in founding a Dutch colony in Manhattan?

[Russell Shorto]

Well, the initial goal was beavers, was animal pelts and also tobacco. I mean, they were trying to make, this is the age of exploration and colonization and they're trying to exploit far flung lands. And so they laid claim to the land. And the Dutch were meticulous after their fashion in negotiating deeds with the native people for tracts of land. And they negotiated hundreds of deeds for the whole area and trying to make a go of it. And there was the larger concern, the Dutch West India Company, which became the sort of overseer of this colony. But then, and this is a story within the story, you've got all these freelance small scale traders and investors who are working under the umbrella of the West India Company. And that's where the kind of life of the, of the colony of New Netherland and the city of New Amsterdam is really, it really infused.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

I'm speaking with Russell Shorto, author of the new book Taking Manhattan. The extraordinary events that created New York and shaped America. It tells the story of how Manhattan was shifted from Dutch to English control. You write in the book very early on today, we are coming to appreciate more keenly than ever before the injustice America has done to the native people. The taking of Manhattan island by The Dutch in 1626 is the very emblem of that injustice. It was not quite the first act of European dispossession, but it's certainly one of the more outrageous examples. I felt it was important to say that out loud. From your research, what was the Lenape understanding of the agreement with the Dutch regarding New Amsterdam?

[Russell Shorto]

Right. Well, first of all, we assume it was the Lenape. We don't even know because we don't have the deed. What we have is a letter that when the first ship went back to Europe, a Dutch official wrote a letter to his bosses saying, our people have purchased the island from the native people. So it was probably the Lenape, because the territory of what's now New York City and into New Jersey was Lenape land. The Dutch knew perfectly well that the native people did not have a concept of real estate and transactions of land. For the native people, the deal would have been something like an alliance, saying, we will allow you to come and live here. We will continue to use the island, and in exchange will support each other. If one of us is attacked, the other will help out. The Dutch knew that. That's what they were involved in. But the Dutch wanted to have a deed, which was an official document in their terms, because they wanted to have something to show other Europeans, the English, for example, to be able to hold up and say, no, we. We've got the title to this land.

[Alison Stewart]

You say that New Amsterdam was already a very pluralistic society before the English showed up. Our city is known for being immigration and multiculturalism. Why was New Amsterdam a welcoming place?

[Russell Shorto]

Welcoming is maybe a bit of a big word, but the Dutch, Dutch tolerance was not, you know, celebrating diversity. It was more restrictive than that. And as I said, it didn't apply to whole groups of people. But it was. It was a real thing. It was a real thing in the Netherlands. The Dutch Republic was sort of the melting pot of Europe. So when that society founded a colony, when Amsterdam, especially the city of Amsterdam, was instrumental in creating New Amsterdam, a lot of those features just came along. So in the famous statistic is in 1643, someone reports 18 languages being spoken at a time when there are probably only about 500 people. So as I like to say, New York was New York even before it was New York. And that is probably underestimating it because it doesn't take into account the native languages. And there were probably at least three different African languages being spoken. So you're probably over 20, 25 languages.

[Alison Stewart]

What role did slavery play in New Amsterdam?

[Russell Shorto]

Slavery is a really interesting and complicated story in the colony. It's. It's ad hoc, initially. The first enslaved Africans probably come in 1627, just a year into the life of the city, more or less by accident, the Dutch were at war with the Spanish and the Portuguese, and they captured a Portuguese ship in the Caribbean. And they had. The captain had learned that the Dutch had the settlement in North America, so they brought them here. It was a couple dozen individuals. So they figured out, what do we do with it? So the West Indian company puts them to work. And it was like that for most of the life of the colony. The first shipment, actual shipment of Africans from Africa to New Amsterdam comes, arrives two weeks before the English do. So when the English warships come in, there's this ship sitting there which had just offloaded all these people. So you got to add that to the. The scene, this chaotic scene in. In Lower Manhattan of this mixed community as it is trying to deal with, okay, we have to defend ourselves, and. And these people kind of stumbling around figuring, what in the world did we get ourselves into?

[Unnamed Interviewer]

There were English people living in the New Netherlands, though. Yes.

[Russell Shorto]

Yeah.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

What was that relationship like?

[Russell Shorto]

Yeah, that was a component. There were many different European nationalities, and a prominent one was English. In England, you have the Civil War going on for much of this time, and you have this polarization, you might say, of English society into the Puritans. That is the, you know, what we would think of today as religious extremists and the royalists, who were essentially everyone else. And so a lot of people went to Puritan New England seeking religious freedom because that's what they promised. But in fact, they discovered that they wanted religious freedom for themselves, not for others. So if you were of a somewhat different sect, they would persecute you, often violently. So many of these people, then they go from England to New England, then from New England, the Dutch are waving this little tolerance flag saying, come here because they need settlers. So there were whole communities of English in the colony who had to swear an oath to the Dutch government. And then that comes into play in the story of the takeover. In particular, Gravesend was a settlement founded by the Englishwoman, Lady Deborah Moody, and that's a predominantly English settlement. So that's where Richard Nicholls, the commander who comes in for the English, bases himself when he's beginning negotiations with Stuyvesant.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Let's talk about Peter Stuyvesant the Director general of the New Netherlands. He was a stern man. That's how he was described in one article I read. By modern standards, he would be considered somewhat of a bad man. Somebody said he was an equal opportunity bigot. Yet his statues, they are everywhere in New York City. So he said that out loud had he been a successful leader in New Netherlands.

[Russell Shorto]

He's an interesting guy, and I've changed my attitude about him since I wrote the island at the center of the World years ago. I saw him in fairly stern, black and white terms. I have come to appreciate largely through the work of a colleague of mine, Dennis Mica, who's writing what will be an important book on how he came with a. He was a Calvinist minister son. He was this, you know, my way or the highway kind of leader. And he comes at a time of great turmoil and he has to impose order. And he immediately, you know, lays down the law and gets this tremendous pushback. And that saga is the subject really of the island center of the world. But over the next few years, then he gets his bearings, he gets his footing, and he realizes that he is an employee of the West India Company. The West India Company has ordered him to make this place work, but he's got all these freelance traders here who want to make a go of it. And the only way to make a go of this place is for them to succeed. So he slowly realizes that he has kind of. He's not just employee of the West India Company, he's kind of a middleman. He has to appease his bosses in Europe and he has to work with these people and get them to come along. So he's. And in doing so, he brings some of the features of Dutch capitalism. The Dutch pioneered capitalism at the same time. So in that sense, he's actually quite a creative guy. Now, part of what he does along the way in 1659, 1660, is negotiate this first shipment of Africans his bosses ordered him to develop to bring in a consignment of Negroes, quote, unquote. And he does. And then that's. Finally, there's 290 men, women and children who come into the harbor just before the English do. So, you know, being a businessman means you're going to deal in whatever you deal in to make money. So, you know, his story is a complicated one.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

When did he start to realize there might Stuyvesant start to realize there might.

[Russell Shorto]

Be trouble here with the English? Yes, it was hinted at throughout the life of the colony. The English, you know, at this period of time, it's the Dutch golden age, so called life was relatively good in the home country. In England, life was hell. You know, you had this English civil war. They beheaded the king. So you have droves of English people coming over to the colonies, mostly in New England, but also to Virginia and Maryland. And right in the middle, in the eastern seaboard is this Dutch settlement, which by the way, was all or parts of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, part of Pennsylvania and Delaware. So they're surrounded by the English, and there's more and more English coming. And then English are doing things like they're crossing Long Island Sound from the mainland to Long Island. Now, Long island was originally Dutch, but then as the English cross and then they move from the easternmost, from Montauk, they move in toward the city. He's feeling encroached from all sides.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

All right, we've laid the groundwork. We're gonna take a quick pledge break. Make sure to stick around because Russell Shorter will be back to break down what happened when the English showed up in Manhattan.

[Russell Shorto]

This is next time on the New Yorker Radio Hour. Tim Walsh of Minnesota on losing the race for the White House.

[Alison Stewart]

An old white guy who ran for vice president.

[Russell Shorto]

You'll land on your feet pretty well. I still struggle with.

[Alison Stewart]

It was my job to get this won. And now when I see Medicaid cuts happening, LGBTQ folks being demonized, that's what weighs on me.

[Russell Shorto]

Tim Waltz joins me next time on the Yorker Radio Hour.

[Alison Stewart]

All of it. This is all of it on wnyc. I'm Alison Stewart and we are back with author Russell Shorto. We're talking about his new book, Taking the Extraordinary Events that Created New York and Shaped America. At the beginning of the hour, we set up what life was like in Dutch New York before the English arrived. And now we're going to discuss how New Amsterdam was handed over to the English and became New York. So during this period in history, how would you describe the relationship between the English and the Dutch?

[Russell Shorto]

They were rivals. They fought. Over the course of the century, they fought several trade wars. And these were wars everywhere. But in their home countries, you know, because they were buying or they were grabbing pieces of continents in Africa and South America and in the Caribbean, and they would take them from each other. And this was one. In fact, the English takeover of New Netherland was an event that precipitated the second Anglo Dutch War.

[Alison Stewart]

The king of England at this time was King Charles ii. Yes.

[Russell Shorto]

Yes.

[Alison Stewart]

Okay. He was restored to the throne after his father had been executed. What do we know about King Charles personality that would help. Help us understand why taking New Amsterdam would become a priority to him?

[Russell Shorto]

There were two brothers of the beheaded King Charles and his younger brother James, and they fled to the continent after their father was beheaded. They lived in exile there. And then in 1660, they returned and returned to the throne. So you had the older one, Charles becomes king, and his brother is the Duke of York. And they worked together. It's a combination, I would say, you know, if you read about that period and these royals, you know, they're great playboys and, you know, they lived large in that way, but at the same time, they were pretty serious about setting up what would become the British Empire. So they had this team of people who were looking at these, at what was exploitable, and they were looking across the Atlantic and seeing, wait a second, we've got these colonies in New England, and we've got these colonies in Virginia and Maryland. But the Dutch, our rivals, have that piece. So they set up a council for foreign plantations, which, as it sounds, is this committee that's all about colonization. They also set up the Royal Society, which then, and you might say even now, was the premier society for the advancement of science. So they were the kind of, in one hand, moderate. They were relatively tolerant when it came to religion, unlike the Puritans, the other side. So you have to put all of that into the mix when you figure who was behind the takeover of the Dutch colony.

[Alison Stewart]

Was there anything specifically about what we call Manhattan that signaled to them that they should take over this area?

[Russell Shorto]

This is, as I said in the first segment, the translation project of the records in Albany. As you get near the end of the. As you get into the 1660s, you start to see. You feel the energy in Manhattan, in New Amsterdam, and that's what they. So when we're looking at those records, we're starting to see it the way they saw it. And the important thing here is the man they picked to lead this expedition, A man named Richard Nichols, who has been forgotten by history. Fascinating figure. He understood. He started doing his homework in London before he ever left on this expedition, he interviewed people who'd lived in the colony. He brought with him a couple of people, Englishmen who had worked for Stuyvesant. And so he didn't just want the island. So the geography was special because this island sits in this harbor and the Hudson river, and then ultimately the Hudson connects to the Mohawk River Valley, which goes all the way to the Great Lakes. I mean, they were you know, thinking about the future in that regard, about exploiting the continent. But it wasn't just the geography. He understood that the Dutch had created something special with this combination of tolerance, relative tolerance, and capitalism. They didn't know what it was. This was something new and alien, but he wanted to keep it. So when he comes there with his guns pointed, he's ready to lay waste, because that's his. What he's been told to do. But he doesn't want to do it because he wants to keep those people, because they have that. That secret sauce. And he wants to know the recipe.

[Alison Stewart]

Why wasn't New Amsterdam better defended?

[Russell Shorto]

Okay, so from the Dutch side, now, Peter Stuyvesant, not just him, but everyone in the community. The interesting thing about writing this story is it's this whole community of about 1500 people that are playing parts. Men, women, enslaved people. They're all chiming in, giving their voice to things. And they had all known that for years. Stuyvesant and other leaders had been writing home saying, look what the. Look what promise we have. We have this colony, and we can continue expanding westward, but you have to support us. You have to give us soldiers, you have to give us more settlers. And they were. Time and again, they were ignored. The Dutch were looking east to the wealth coming out of Asia. They were looking to Brazil, other places. So they were frustrated. And that sets up. So on the one hand, you've got Nichols and the English who don't want to destroy, and on the other hand, you've got the Dutch who are saying, what recourse do we have? The home country isn't gonna support us.

[Alison Stewart]

So what does Peter Stuyvesant do when.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Faced with these British troops?

[Russell Shorto]

So as I said before, when I write history, I think of myself more as a storyteller than a writer of history. You know, people often will say to me, oh, I learned so much from your book. And they mean it as a compliment, but it kind of annoys me because you. I don't just think of myself as, like, amassing facts. I want to tell a story. And what I'd really like to hear people say is, oh, I got completely lost in the. In the. You know, I didn't know what time it was, that kind of thing. So here you have this complicated situation brewing. And several times over this two week period, the late summer of 1664, and several times, like one, at one point, Nichols orders his ships to make a run past the fort at the tip of the island with their, you know, guns pointed and he's like egging them to fire. But they hold back. And instead they send messengers on small boats back and forth from his ships to the, to the fort. And they're feeling each other out. And they come to realize that they have a lot in common, that this, these Englishmen, Stuyvesant knows, are very different from the English in New England with this puritanical cult. They are much more, they're pragmatic, they're moderate, they're relatively tolerant. So when they start to talk, you know, what it ultimately comes to is the so called Articles of surrender, which, if it was really articles of surrender, it would have these onerous, you must not do this, you will give up your arms and so on. None of that language is in there. What's in there is very much like a bill of rights. It says, you will all keep your homes, you'll keep your ships, you'll keep your businesses. By all means, keep your business contacts in other parts of the world. So it's inviting them, it's saying, we want you to continue and to do well. If you succeed, then this new entity is gonna succeed.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

So you don't think the English ever really wanted to go to war?

[Russell Shorto]

I think his command was to go to war and his ships were loaded to the gills. But Richard Nichols, and this is what's interesting about him, you know, he's thousands of miles away, he can't text home or anything. You know, it's just up to him how to deal with. And he decides, I'm gonna do something different. I'm gonna make a deal with them. I'm gonna make all these promises to them because I want them to stay. I don't wanna have to start over with a burnt out landscape. So that, in my argument is what sets up New York on its trajectory. It remains, quote, Dutch in its important features. It remains this capitalistic, multi ethnic place. And the big change is it's gonna be under new ownership. And James, I mean, Richard Nichol letter in which he almost, by the way, writes to the Duke of York and says, you know, oh, and I, I named this place New York after you, after your title. So, you know, he did so much that set up the, the terms of what New York became, established all those features in terms of its, its makeup. But he also, you know, New Amsterdam had been this little cluster of streets at the financial district. He said, no, from now on, New York will be the whole island of Manhattan. So he readjusted the terms of it.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

I want to ask about those terms. What were The Dutch. What were the priorities of the Dutch? What were the priorities of the English once they come to this agreement?

[Russell Shorto]

Yeah, I think the priorities largely overlapped. The Dutch wanted to keep their homes and their businesses. And so you have to distinguish between when I say the Dutch and I'm talking about the people here. First of all, they weren't all Dutch. Maybe half of them were Dutch, but they were all sorts of other nationalities. And these were people. We're like, 40 years into the life of this colony. You're into, like, the third generation, in some cases of people living here who've built up a life. And that life extends to, you know, everybody in town. Some visitor said, everybody here is a trader. Everybody in town would put money down onto voyages. They'd send a. They'd send a shipload to Brazil, bring back sugar or whatever. So everybody was a trader. Everybody was involved in this activity. And the deal that they hashed out was good for them. And the English wanted it to be good for them because then it would ultimately good for the English. Who it wasn't good for was the Dutch government and the Dutch West India Company. And that's why once this was all over, Peter Stuyvesant was recalled and put on trial, basically, for giving up this thing that he was supposed to defend.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

What did the transfer from the Dutch or the English are sort of this melding. What did this mean for the indigenous people in the surrounding area and the enslaved people?

[Russell Shorto]

Yeah, the enslaved people. As I said before, slavery really just got. Was getting ramped up at this time. So it never truly got underway under the Dutch, although they set it up, and then under the English, it would actually, you know, New York. We are slowly coming to be aware that New York was a quite prominent slave holding and slavery, a slave market, and that starts in this period, but it really takes off under the Dutch for the native people. The Dutch began the process of dispossessing native people. And, you know, it was like, okay, we're going to buy this piece of land. And then initially we think, yes, you can stay around. But then they get pushed out. Then they. And you'll see accounts where the same village of Lenape, they sign one deal and then they move, and then they signed another deal, and then they move further westward and they're being pushed further and further. So it sets up the whole process, you might say, I mean, not to lay too much on the people in this. The Europeans in New York, but basically the whole process of the dispossession of native people across the continent begins here.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

I'm speaking with Russell Shorto, author of the new book Taking the Extraordinary Events that created New York and Shaped America tells the story of how Manhattan was shifted from Dutch to English control. Russell will be speaking at the South street seaport on Monday, March 10th at 6:30. And I believe he will be in New Canyon, Connecticut on Sunday, March 9th from 3 to 4pm it was funny. As I was looking in the book, I realized today is an important. Today. Today. In 1664, the second Anglo Dutch war started.

[Russell Shorto]

Oh, okay.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

March 4th, right.

[Russell Shorto]

I don't have that in my head. Good for you, Alison.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Did the surrender of New Amsterdam contribute to the causes of that war?

[Russell Shorto]

The surrender of New Amsterdam was probably the main event that touched off the war because it was an acti mean they were at peace at the time and the English took over. So yeah, that was in August and September that they took over. And then in March, the war began. And then everyone thought that. That at the end of. Because the way these things worked, they were these trade wars. They would bash away at each other for a few years and then the negotiators would sit down and they would give things back. But that didn't happen this time. There's a Latin term which I'm forgetting, but it basically means keep everything as it is. So that's what they ended up doing. And people in the Dutch colony, like the Dutch people in the colony were surprised. They wrote letters saying, well, I guess now I'm gonna have to learn English. They were holding out until the Dutch took it back.

[Alison Stewart]

Tell us about the Treaty of B R E D A.

[Russell Shorto]

The Treaty of Breda. That's a city in the southern part of the Netherlands. And that's what they. And it's hundreds of negotiators because these were very complicated, you know, and it wasn't. Some people will say to me, oh, I've heard that, you know, that the Dutch swapped New Amsterdam for Suriname in South America or for this little island called Run Pulau Run in the East Indies. Neither of those was the case. It wasn't a one for one deal. You had columns of properties on both sides that were. One had won from the other. And the treaty basically said, we're keeping everything as it is.

[Alison Stewart]

When you think about New York today, what still seems Dutch about New York City?

[Russell Shorto]

I think a lot of New York seems Dutch. And it's not just me. People who. Cause I wrote a book about the history of the city of Amsterdam. I lived there for seven years and a lot of Dutch people who, in New York and New Yorkers in Amsterdam feel like, you know, there's something. There's a certain kind of business like brusqueness that both cities have in common. They're practical places, obviously. They're both places with enormous diversity and numbers of languages and religions. And, you know, I've even heard. I don't know if this is true, but I've heard that there is some aspect of New York accent that goes back. Like people have said to me, long island, you know, that kind of is kind of a remnant of. I'm not signing off on that, but I've heard it.

[Alison Stewart]

It's so much fun when you go to Amsterdam and go to Haarlem.

[Russell Shorto]

Haarlem. So I should ask you, does it feel like this?

[Alison Stewart]

Well, it's really funny because you're walking around and also on the rivers, it looks like the upper Upper east, west side. The buildings, they're beautiful. The turrets, they're gorgeous. It just reminds you of, like, I think I've been here before.

[Russell Shorto]

Yeah, there's a. Yeah, a lot of features. There's a lot of, you know, just overall, what I am interested in, what I'm most interested in is tracking ideas and how they spread. And I think I'm partly interested in that because it's impossible. You can't follow an idea. You know, it's like following an atomer. Something. But it's still worthwhile because it's ultimately trying to figure out how we got here and who we are. And that's what this is about, you know, looking at, as I say in the book, New York had two parents, one Dutch and one English. And it has features of both of them. And the. Until relatively recently, that Dutch part of its background was. Was buried. It wasn't as apparent, but I think it becomes more apparent as you. As you tease it.

[Alison Stewart]

What do you wish people understood more about this period of Manhattan's history?

[Russell Shorto]

Okay, here's one thing that relates to where we are at this moment in our history. Here were these two rivals who were ready to go at one another, and they stopped and they started talking. And they realized that there was an overlap, that there was something that they had in common, and that out of that you could build something new, something bigger than either of them could do on their own. And I think that sort of thinking has been forgotten, and I think that's an important lesson.

[Alison Stewart]

The name of the book is Taking the Extraordinary Events that Created New York and Shaped America. Author Russell Shorter will discuss his new book at the New Canaan Library, 151 Main St. Sunday, March 9 from 3 to 4pm and he will be at the South Street Seaport museum on Monday, March 10th at 6:30.

[Russell Shorto]

Allison. I'll also be at the Explorers Club on Thursday.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Well, all right. You're busy.

[Alison Stewart]

You got a book out. It's a really good book.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Thank you so much for making the time today.

[Russell Shorto]

Thanks so much, Alison. For 140 years, MultiCare has been in Washington prioritizing long term solutions, partnering with local communities and expanding access to care.

[Unnamed Interviewer]

Together we're building a healthier future.

[Progressive Insurance Ad]

Learn more@ multicare.org NYC now delivers the most up to date local news from WNYC and Gothamist every morning, midday and evening with three updates a day. Listeners get breaking news, top headlines and in depth coverage from across New York City. By sponsoring programming like NYC now, you'll reach our community of dedicated listeners with premium messaging and an uncluttered audio experience. Visit sponsorship.wnyc.org to get in touch and find out more.