← America First with Nicholas J. Fuentes Repost
America First with Nicholas J. Fuentes Repost
SPLC INDICTED??? DOJ Brings FRAUD Charges Against Left Wing Group | America First Ep. 1673
02:03:46
Loading summary
Transcript101 lines
- [00:00]
A
Good evening, everybody. You're watching America first. My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. We have a great show for you tonight. Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Tuesday. We have a lot to talk about tonight. Lots to get into. Big show, kind of a slow week, if I'm being honest. I said it last night and it's so true. I'm away for two weeks. I'm thinking that something big is gonna happen, something's gonna change. Cause the news was slow even at the beginning of the month. But nothing is going on. But that's okay. Our featured story tonight, we're gonna pick up where we left off yesterday. We're gonna talk all about this huge indictment against the SPLC by the doj. And there's been a lot that has been said about this on social media. Lot of discussion about it. There has been a major, major indictment, a fraud charge against the splc. For those that don't know, SPLC is a Southern poverty law center that has emerged and has become one of the biggest left wing activist organizations. Super rich. They actually have, according to their most recent tax filing, $700 million in the bank, all in cash. And the big fraud charge stems from something like a counterintelligence program that they've been running since the 1980s. And for those that don't know, the SPLC has effectively been paying far right extremists, which they say is an informant program. We'll talk about what that means and why they consider it that. But they've paid over $3 million over the years to something like three dozen different confidential informants that they say had been positioned to infiltrate right wing groups, far right groups, white supremacist groups, neo Nazi groups, the Klan, nsm, people that organize Charlottesville. The DOJ says that this constitutes a deception or a fraud. They say that the SPLC represents to the donors that they're fighting right wing extremism. But technically speaking, if they're pouring $3 million into right wing extremist groups, even if they are informants, technically it constitutes fraud. They're defrauding the donors. They're telling them they're fighting extremism, which they're actually funding. And we'll talk all about it. It's a pretty big story. And I said it last night. I actually support the indictment. I support the investigation. I don't know if it's gonna hold up in court. I don't know if it's good, legally speaking. But I do think it's a huge step in the right direction. And the Trump administration should be doing this with all these left wing groups. I don't know why we stop here at the splc. You should have something like this, and maybe not specifically a fraud indictment, but there should be a comprehensive investigation of every one of these media matters. Adl, splc, Right Wing Watch, which is under People for the American Way. Uh, that should just be for openers. That should have been, for starters, at the very beginning. And we are now a year and a half into the second Trump administration. We already have turnover at the doj, and it seems that the new acting Attorney General, Todd Blanch, he's actually less aggressive than Pam Bondi, which does not really bode well. It's not good. In other words, if Pam Bondi was this slow, she was actually, from what I hear on the inside, she was actually pretty good. And at least she was willing to do some of these things, specifically these indictments against Trump's enemies or against the far left. She seemed like she was totally down to do these things. And it's minimal. Now we have this new acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche, and he seems to be even more conservative than her, even slower. Um, so we'll talk a little bit about what's going on at doj. We'll talk about the indictment. We're also gonna talk about some of the allegations against me. I saw this story come out. Admittedly, it's sort of an old story. It came out last week. We didn't get to cover it. When the story dropped, everybody said that I was involved. There was a story about SPLC paying the far right paying informants. And so naturally, the pro Trump MAGA crowd, everybody said, oh, well, that's Nick Fuentes. The reason he's supporting Democrats in the midterms is because he's an informant for the splc. This is what I see in my replies on Twitter for the past week. It's all the usual suspects saying, oh, you took the check from the sblc, you sold out. And we'll talk about that, too. I addressed it a little bit last night by simply saying, if you Google my name in the splc, you'll see that they have been on my case for, like, 10 years. As long as I've been doing the show, they have been on my case. And I don't mean that they have been negative towards me. I mean, they have tried to destroy my operation, destroy my life. They doxed my address, my parents, my employees, my interns, people that I know. And they've done that for a very long time. Uh, but nobody cares, you know, that doesn't really matter. So anyway, so we'll talk all about that. That's gonna be our main story. And then we're also gonna get a little bit into the war in Iran. The thing about the war in Iran is nobody even really knows where we are with this. The situation in the war is virtually unchanged, which is crazy because I went away for two weeks and we were in a position where Trump had just announced the cease fire. And although the cease fire had theoretically been agreed upon and was announced and everything, nobody was really sure exactly what the terms were and whether both parties had agreed to the same thing. When I left, there was a ton of uncertainty about what the status of that agreement was. Nevertheless, there is something like a ceasefire still in place. And the ceasefire was supposed to actually have expired last week, exactly this day last week. Uh, and as the cease fire was supposed to expire because the conditions for the cease fire had still not been met, Trump announced an indefinite extension of the cease fire shortly before it was set to expire. And so that is, technically speaking, where we are, if you're following the press releases, the true social post, the official statements from the government, we are still in the ceasefire phase of the conflict. And this time we don't even know what it's for. I'll talk a little bit more about that tonight in detail. But if you remember, the original ceasefire said there's gonna be a two week cessation of hostilities so that Iran and the United States could agree to a comprehensive deal to end the war. That has not happened. And as far as we know, there are no negotiations going on either. So we don't have a comprehensive deal. We're not on our way to a comprehensive deal. It's not even being negotiated. The other major sticking point for the cease fire was that Iran would have to open up the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping. We. Well, they haven't done that either. Strait of Hormuz has not been opened throughout the entire duration of the ceasefire, for the most part, and still is not open. So if the original conditions were for the ceasefire were we're going to create this allowance so that diplomacy can resume as long as the strait is opened. Well, neither of those things have happened. Neither of those things are happening. And yet, even though those conditions are unfulfilled, they. The cease fire got extended. Except this time it's indefinite. The first cease fire was two weeks. They said there's a deadline, another deadline, another ultimatum. They said two weeks to make a Deal. Two weeks. And then we resume the kinetic operations against Iran. Now it's just wide open. Now it's indefinite. We don't really know where we are in the conflict. We've stopped bombing them yet. The Strait of Hormuz is closed. And now the only thing that has changed is that since the ceasefire expired, the United States has imposed a blockade of its own of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has closed the Straight for all other shipping that is aligned with the United states. Now the U.S. navy has closed the Straight, a blockade for all other shipping that is connected to Iran now. And it's not just energy, but it's all international shipping that is in support of Iran. The only difference is our blockade is far less effective because of the operating distance because of the proximity to the Straight, where the US Navy is able to operate in the Arabian Sea. Uh, so we'll talk a little bit about that tonight. We're gonna get into the state of the conflict and talk about where it is going. Um, but I mean, like I said, all there is really to say about it is that there still seems to be no strategy here. Here we are. It's the end of April. So it's been actually two full months. War started on February 28th. It's April 28th. Two full months of conflict. Not only have we not achieved any of our objectives, we've actually gone backwards because the Strait is now closed. So we achieved nothing of what we sought to do from the very beginning. And then during the course of the war, the Straight was taken by Iran. We're not able to get it back. The objectives have not been completed. And two months in, we still don't even know what we're doing here. What's the plan? What's the strategy? What even are the aims? Have we retained any of our initial objectives? Or is the only objective now just to end the war itself and try to resign with some dignity? So we'll talk all about that. It's gonna be a good show. Before we get into it, I wanna remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble. Smash the like button. Leave a comment, let me know what you think about the show. Check out our merch store at Fuentis Store. We have all of our new products here. And sadly, it is with a heavy heart, truly, that I tell you this. Do we even have it here? I probably should have pulled it out. But if you did not get the Gr Betts Bratz T shirt, you may never be able to acquire it because it has been removed from the Store. There was a copyright strike against the shirt. So we had this Gripettes Bratz crop top, and we had it for sale when we first launched the collection. We had it on sale last night. But there's been a copyright issue with the actual Bratz company. I don't know who told them that. How did they know? How did they know that we were selling a little shirt with an homage to the Bratz dolls? I don't know how they found out about that. Someone must have told them. I don't know who's responsible for that, but you've broken a lot of hearts. You know, it's. People are gonna be devastated by this. There are a lot of young women and young men that are gonna be devastated that there are no more Groipatz crop tops. Now if you bought one, you might be okay, but you can't buy them anymore. And I think that's it. So we're. We might try to find a way to sell a different crop top. It's not gonna be the same thing. It's gonna have to be a little bit different. But for now, the Groipetz merch, it's dead. It's gone. No Groipet's crop top. Unless you bought one. If you bought one, you're good. Otherwise, I think you're out of luck. Those are now a collector's item. So if you bought them, maybe you want to hang on to them. Those are now a collector's item. Sometimes that's the way it goes. But we still got plenty of other good stuff. We got the vintage distressed America first hat. This is, I think, gonna be one of the hottest things. I haven't looked at the numbers, but I think that's gonna be a. A big seller. It's kind of, you know, trendy, new. We got the white America first hat. I'll show you some of my favorites. We're not going to go through the whole lineup. We got the zip up hoodie with the embroidered AF logo. This might be my favorite. I think this is going to be one of the favorites. Embroidered on the back, America first with the shield. And then we have the America first shorts. Whoops. Very high quality material. These, then they match. They match the zip up. If you want to go for that look, you know, you don't have to. You know, you can wear em together or separately. We have this one. This is kind of like a varsity. It just says America first. I know it's kind of plain, but high quality hoodie. This is like more you can blend in with this, you can wear this and they're not gonna clock you. You can wear this at the State Department, can wear this wherever. You can wear this at a Palantir. You know, if you have a job there, you can wear this. And Alex Carp is not gonna know. Nobody's gonna know. The last one I'll show is we have the Jeffrey Epstein white, I mean, the USA quarter zip in white. And this one's pretty sharp. People were asking for this one and we finally delivered, we doubled down. And it goes well with the, with the white hat, I think too. I think of like golf. I think if you're on the golf course, this is like a good fit. White quarter zip, perfect for after. What is it, Memorial Day or Labor Day? I don't even know, you know, which one it is in May. But, but this is great. And, and like I said, it matches the hat. So we got a bunch of other stuff too, so check it out. Fuentes Store. High quality, high quality stuff. And if you want to support the show, subscribe at America first dot plus 15 bucks a month to get access to the entire archive of the show. That's every episode of the show, every commentary stream, gaming stream, collaboration, interview, debate, speech. It's all there. MP3 format, MP3 downloads. And for a hundred bucks a month, you get to join the Telegram. Group chat with me. And I'm in the group chat. I'm hanging out in there, dropping additional bonus content. And people seem to love it. People are dying to get in. So check it out. That's America first plus. Okay. With that out of the way, we're gonna dive in. Like I said, though, I feel like nothing's really going on lately. I don't know, maybe we just need to get further into spring and summer. But I go on the news today and what are the big stories? There's a visit from the king. Trump is putting his face on the passport. So that's great. And I think that's about it for the, for the news today. I saw that Trump is putting his face on the US passport. And it's like I said last night, it seems like that's all this administration really even does. I mean, 10 years ago you would have found something like that funny. I can't lie. I would have fell for that. Ten years ago during the first Trump administration. If the Trump White House social media was saying that two kings met today, the King of England and the King of America, I would think that was really funny. And they were trolling the left. And if Trump put his face on the passport and put a portrait of Joe Biden in the White House, but it's actually an auto pen. I would have thought that stuff was hilarious. But when everything else is so bad, when the foreign policy, immigration policy, domestic policy, when all this other stuff is so bad and it's not happening, it almost makes it worse. Not only is it not funny, it's actually, like, insulting. So that, to me, that was, like, the big. Or I shouldn't say to me in the news, that was the big story today is that Trump is modifying the US Passport. If you renew your passport, you're gonna get a portrait of Donald Trump in the booklet, and it's going to trigger all this conversation in the media about how, oh, they Trump is really overstepping. Oh, this is ridiculous. I can't believe it. It's like, of course you can believe. It's all absurd. And whoever's gonna be the next president is just gonna undo all of it the second they get in, and it's all gonna be pointless. So, anyway, but we are gonna move on. We're gonna get into our big story for tonight, which is the major indictment of the SPLC by the Department of Justice. And what I have to say about this is like, okay, finally, wasn't this the whole point of the second Trump administration? I remember when Trump was running for president in 2024. To me, the only argument that you could even really use to justify voting for Trump is something like this. That he had been royally screwed over in the first term. He was sabotaged from the inside by his own personnel, by the intelligence community, by the FBI, by the Democrats, even by the Republicans. The election was stolen and rigged against him. Then they tried to send him to jail and kill him. They indicted him. They were gonna send him up for 115 years in prison, and then ultimately, they shot him in the head. And so the argument went something like this. Because of all of that, because of that experience, Trump was going to be the vengeance of America. That we raised up this challenge against the hegemonic left wing in 2016. We won fair and square. We should have gotten change. Instead, we found out the whole system was rigged. Trump had a mandate to govern. We were supposed to get a border wall and a new trade agreement, end the wars in the Middle East. But because of this systematic and structural obstruction, we were effectively denied what we were owed. And so now, because the system is so screwed up and so rigged, Trump was supposed to come back in with a vengeance, having learned his lesson. So to Speak. He learned how Washington works. He learned that he can't trust certain people. And now he's off. So now he's not playing around. Now he's going to punch everybody in the face, and we're going to get what we're owed. That was the premise. And by the way, Trump played into that throughout the entire campaign. I remember in 2024, and I'm sure you do as well, he went to cpac, he went to the rallies, and he said, I am your vengeance. That was a line they used, and they wrote that line, and that was part of the stump speech. And they knew what they were doing during the primary, in particular in 2023, and in early 2024, that was the message. I will be your vengeance. I'm not just gonna be your voice. I'm gonna be your retribution, your vengeance. And a lot of people love this idea that Trump was going to come in and he was going to be this burn it all down figure that he never was in the first term. He would truly be retribution. And then, you might remember during the general election, they changed the message a little bit. They. They stopped saying that. They softened the message. Suddenly it wasn't mass deportations and indictments and retribution. Suddenly it turned into stapling green cards to diplomas. And if Iran gets a nuke, we're gonna wipe them off the map. And, you know, we have to let people in legally. We need the people, we need the labor, et cetera. The message changed. Trump gets in. Okay, well, now It's May nearly 2026, and we don't have any of this. There's no retribution against illegals. There's no retribution against foreign adversaries or allies for that closest ally, for that matter. There is no retribution against the deep state and the bureaucracy. And so one of the big things that we were looking for in this term was indictments. Is the Trump DOJ going to persecute its enemies in the way that the Biden Justice Department persecuted theirs? Because what did Joe Biden do when he got into office? Almost before he got into office, they started charging people. The DOJ hired a thousand judges, 10,000 FBI agents, and they went after everybody that was involved in January 6, everybody that was involved at every level. And they started going after people from the Trump administration and the Trump campaign, and they started going after Trump himself. And so this was. This was a serious, comprehensive lawfare campaign to systematically destroy the MAGA movement. And this went on throughout 21, 22, 23. Trump administration gets in. We don't have nothing, Nothing. No indictment on Obama, on the Clintons. Not using the Epstein files for that matter, not using it against. Today we just got something against James Comey. Tried to do it against a couple of other officials, but it fell through. Finally, finally last week, and this is the good news, finally the DOJ announced a major indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center. And this indictment is sort of interesting because it reveals the true nature and the activities of the far left. So Southern Poverty Law center is one of these legal activist organizations started up in the civil rights era and it was supposed to be one of these groups that defends the rights of the minorities and the oppressed. They came up in the civil rights era and they were defending mostly black people from civil rights violations, but it was also Jews and, and all the other disaffected so called marginalized groups. The indictment against the SPLC alleges that they committed fraud because of a program that they have been running for almost 50 years. It's effectively a counterintelligence program. So you think of the SPLC and you think of legal activism, you think of how, for example, one of their activities, they have a program called Hate Watch where they monitor hate organizations, hate speech, extremist groups, that's one of their activities. They also represent people in the event of a civil rights violation. I believe they brought some of the civil litigation against the Charlottesville organizers and they supported that. So these are some of the activities that they're known for and that you might imagine that they get up to. But this indictment again alleging fraud, reveals that not only do they do all these ordinary things, but they also have been paying informants under the table to the tune of millions of dollars, upwards of $3 million to effectively go into far right extremist organizations allegedly to spy on them. So over the decades they had been paying people in the Ku Klux Klan, in the National Socialist movement, people that attended and organized Charlottesville, all of the major so called hate groups, neo Nazi, white nationalist, Christian identity groups like this. They had been paying people inside those organizations in many cases, like lots of money, like a, like a full time salary, part time or full time salary. One individual has paid more than a million dollars. That's a lot of money to be a deadbeat in the clan or something. And paying these people allegedly to spy on the activities of those organizations. The DOJ says that that constitutes fraud because the SPLC is representing to their donors that they're fighting is extremism, hate groups, hate speech. When in reality, no matter what you Call it whether they're informants or whatever, they are not being forthright about it. They're not being transparent about it. They are clandestinely and secretly giving money to those very same far right organizations. And they're using what could be illegal accounting tricks to hide the money trail, to hide the paper trail for those disbursements. And this is the story. This is from the Associated Press. We'll just go through some of the details here. It says, quote, the Southern Poverty Law center was indicted Tuesday on federal fraud charges alleging it had improperly raised millions of dollars to secretly pay leaders of the Ku Klux Klan and other hate groups for inside information. The Justice Department alleges the civil rights group defrauded donors by using their money to fund the very extremism it claimed to be fighting with more than $3 million paid to informants through a now defunct program to infiltrate white supremacist and other extremist groups. The civil rights group faces charges of wire fraud, bank fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering in the case brought in the federal court in Alabama. The group said the program was used to monitor threats of violence and the information was often shared with local and federal law enforcement. The indictment includes details on at least nine unnamed informants paid by the SPLC through a secret program that prosecutors said began in the 1980s. Within the SPLC, they were known as field sources or the Fs. According to the indictment, one informant was paid more than $1 million between 2014 and 2023. So a million dollars over nine years, that's like a six figure salary practically. And that individual was affiliated with the Neo Nazi National Alliance. Prosecutors say another informant was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville. The informant attended the rally at the direction of the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation for several others. That person was allegedly paid more than $270,000 between 2015 and 2023. So the first thing I wanna say about this, and this is just at this point, what even do you say? The first thing I wanna do is clear the air. So this story comes out last week. This is an old story and it's what I just read to you. The DOJ is indicting SPLC for fraud because of this informant program. They say it's defunct, but it's been operational since at least a few years ago. And basically the SPLC caught wind of this investigation. It started in the first Trump administration, shelved under Biden, came back in Trump too. And I Believe the SPLC wound this program down because they caught wind that this was gonna be a problem for them. So it says it's defunct, but not really. It's more like they got caught with their hand in the cookie jar and, and then they had to cover their tracks. Um, but in any case, story comes out and almost immediately after the story comes out, people start to say that I am one of the field operatives. What do they call it? A field source. Particularly the one that I just named that went to Charlottesville. And I'll reread that last paragraph for you. People started to say that this person was me. The story comes out. We don't even have all the details. We have the indictment, but this is the part that everybody said was me. It says, quote, another informant was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned Unite the Right. The informant attended the rally at the direction of the splc, help coordinate transportation for several others. That person was paid 2,70,000 between 2015 and 2023. Everybody immediately took that. All the pro Trump influencers, they. There's no evidence. It doesn't even make sense. We'll talk about why. But that little blurb, cuz that is what is in the indictment, they sort of break down nine of the informants. That little blurb, everybody said, oh, that must be Fuentes, cuz he was at J6. Now we're hearing about the SPLC. Oh, the far right was always a spook. And I want to talk about it about me in particular, but I also want to talk about the far right in general. Let's just talk about me in particular first. So just for anybody that is curious or in doubt or anything like that, first of all, the details don't even make sense. The indictment says this person was paid from 2015 to 2023. In 2015 I was 16 years old, okay? I turned 17. I was a junior in high school in 2015. Okay. And I wasn't even far right in 2015. I was like a libertarian. I thought Trump was too far right. Okay, so, so that's for openers, they said this person between 15 and 23 was paid a quarter of a million dollars. Okay, well me, I was in high school when that started. That's one, two as it pertains to Charlottesville. And I've told this story a million times. I didn't even actually go to Charlottesville. And you might say, well, what does that mean? It was a last minute decision. I was not, I did not organize Charlottesville. I didn't know any of the leaders at Charlottesville. At that time, I was 18. I was 18 when Charlottesville happened. I was a college dropout. I had no connections. And I made a last minute decision to go about two or three days before the rally. I wasn't even in the city for the Tiki torch march. And by the time I landed the day of the actual protest, by the time I got to my hotel, the whole thing was already over. I literally just got there late. And I could show you receipts for that, I could show you proof, um, but I've told this story, it's been consistent for like 10 years. I showed up at my hotel at like 11am The Saturday of the rally. By that time the police had already dispersed it. I got there late, everybody was getting chased out of the park. I went with James, also up a handful of other people. We were there for like a half hour. Then I went back to my hotel. So none of those details even make sense. One other thing which is a little bit relevant. I have been at war with the SPLC for my entire career and they have done horrible things to me, not least of all, including the. They doxed my assistant who went by the name of Jew Greiper. This was my only full time employee. They doxed him. Two of my interns that were working on Capitol Hill for Paul Gosar and Marjorie Taylor Green, they doxed those people. The biggest one and the best one though is that in 2022, they are actually the group responsible for doxing my home address. You remember this? You might have heard about it. About a year and a half ago, I put out a tweet after the election, I said, your body, my choice. It went super viral. It got a hundred million views. Because the tweet generated so much outrage, people found my address and hundreds of people, that's not an exaggeration, started showing up to my house, knocking on my door, throwing eggs at my house, uh, doing all kinds of things, recording my house, honking their horn, whatever. And it led to someone trying to kill me. A young man, 23 year old man, came to my door with a gun after he killed three people already. He killed his best friend, best friend's mom and sister. And then he drove three hours to my house, to my front door, marched up to the front door with a gun with the intention of killing me. Okay? All of that happened because in 2022, when I actually moved into my new address, the SPLC doxed my house. They posted a picture of my house on their website and they linked to my Address. They interviewed my neighbors and published about my whereabouts when I come and go, what floor I live on. And I'll read you. This is from the article. You can Google it. The headline is, nick Fuentes trades parents basement for pricey live streaming den. Pricey live streaming den. It was, it was a $390,000 3 flat in Berwyn, Illinois. Okay. Pricey live streaming den. It's not. This is like a working class neighborhood. That's not that much money. It's a three flat apartment building. They say pricey, pricey live streaming den is crazy. You would have, you would have thought it's like some million dollar single family home in like Park Ridge or Hinsdale or Elmhurst. Pricey live streaming den is crazy. Yeah, he, he bought an apartment building in Pilsen. Living like a real king, this guy. Anyway, so that's the headline. Trade's parents basement. I think I was 22 when I moved out. I know that's totally insane to live with your parents when you're 22 anyway, but this is the article. It says, quote, hate Watch spoke to several of Fuentes neighbors whose names are being withheld over concerns they may be harassed or targeted by Fuentes followers. You're interviewing my neighbors, it says. On the topic of Fuentes, most of the neighbors and Hate Watch spoke with, say the live streamer who pumps out vociferous white nationalist propaganda on his live streams, appears meek in real life, keeping to himself, apparently entertaining few visitors and does not call attention to himself. Several said that when he is at his home in Berwyn, his movements appear to be limited to passing from his garage to the back door of the apartment. Fuentes. His building is located on a quiet tree lined street across a short walk from one of Berwin's main shopping districts. On the block where the white nationalist two story building is located, Hate Watch observed his neighbors doing weekend chores and children playing in yards and on sidewalks. From the property's exterior, Hate Watch observed the basement apartment and the first floor was empty. They're literally looking through my windows on the second floor. The blinds were drawn. Hate Watch also observed a construction permit on the window of the first floor of the building. And neighbors confirmed Hate Watch's impression that the basement and first floor appear to be currently unoccupied with Fuentes and his live streaming operation on the second floor. On another visit, a Hate Watch reporter knocked on the front door, but there was no answer. So look like I'm not one to complain. You know that about me. One thing you know about me is I don't complain. Like I hate complaining, but how messed up is it? How messed up is, is this? This, this is insane. This is fucked up. And this is totally insane that a far left political group with a billion dollars in cash is posting for everybody to know where a person lives with this much detail. This is insane. We look through his windows, this floor is unoccupied. We think he lives in the second floor. We talked to his neighbors, we knocked on the front door. These are his habits, these are his whereabouts. This should be illegal. What is the purpose of this? It's not like they're reporting on my rhetoric or my show or my operation. They're literally telling everybody this is where he lives, get him. If you wanna kill this guy, this is where he is. This is where you can find him. This is where you can, this is where you can physically hurt this person. That's all that is. And everybody knows that. That's like a form, that is like a soft form of homicide. Cuz that is what they're doing here. They're trying to incite people to kill me. They're saying, if you wanna mess with this person, harass this person, intimidate, assault, murder this person, this is where you can find them. They, that's what it is. While simultaneously saying he's a vociferous white nationalist, but he's evil, his fans are insane. Okay, but then it gets better. If that's not bad enough. So this super rich organization is just doxing a civilian, doxing a citizen. That's not bad enough. They get what they want, okay? The docs exists because of the splc. And, and when I get in controversy, people start showing up and yeah, someone tries to kill me and now a young man is dead. Not this young man, but the person that tried to kill me was killed by police. Now fast forward a year and a half later and people are seriously saying that I'm getting paid by this organization. People are saying, oh, you sold out to the splc, you took money. Oh, now I see why you support the Democrats. You, you're an SPLC informant. And no one will ever know and no one will ever care because that is the nature of the information space. These pro Trump influencers, they do not care about the truth. They have no integrity. They're all being paid. They have identified me as somebody that is contrary to Trump, contrary to the Republican Party. And so because I am the enemy now, they're just going to put that out there. They, they don't care. That it's not true. Laura Loomer, all these other people putting this stuff out, this is just gonna be another one of those things they say about me. Just like the J6 thing. Oh, that SPLC. Oh, I heard he was with the SPLC. But it's just one of those things that through repetition, they put out there. And nobody knows the SPLC is responsible for almost taking my life. I have to move because of them because. Because they almost killed me. And now I'm gonna be tarred for the rest of my career with this insinuation that I'm also being paid by them. So even if somebody tries to kill you, they're still gonna say you're being paid by them. Okay? And by the way, here's the other. Here's the other part that's even better. All these people that are saying that they never got targeted by the splc. The SPLC is only one among many groups that are like this. There is the splc, there is the adl, there is the Media Matters for America. There is Right Wing Watch Project for American Way, Atlantic Council, Digital Forensics Lab. You have all these different outfits, you have all these different NGOs, excuse me, nonprofits, activist groups. And their job is to put the screws on the far right through whatever. It's like guerrilla warfare. Paying informants, doxing you, going after your payments, going after your family, your associates, bringing the government down on you. They don't play fair, they don't play nice. This is what they do. And the rich irony in this is that the center right people that are accusing me and others of being feds or informants for the splc, they never get targeted by the far left, Never get censored. All these people that are saying this takes. Take like Chris Rufo and Lomez, for example, these are two guys that have a show on the Blaze. Lomez, his real name is Jonathan Keeperman. He's at Passage Press. Christopher Rufo's at Manhattan Institute. They have been putting that kind of stuff out there, that the far right are all feds, they're with the splc, whatever. These are two center right guys that have a job at the Blaze, have a job at the Paul Singer fun funded Manhattan Institute. They've never been censored in their lives. They never got banned on Twitter. They never got banned on YouTube, and they still aren't. They never got banned on PayPal. They never got banned on stripe. No one ever tried to kill them. They never got doxed. And this is the classic, because here I'm trying to paint a picture here for you. This is the classic construction, which is that the center right works with the far left against the far right every single time. The far left wages war on the far right and the center right joins them hand in hand. So, for example, the far left wants to censor the far right. The center right won't defend us. It was like this for years. The center right for a decade would say, we're against cancel culture, we're against censorship. They, they never got censored and they never got canceled. They remained gainfully employed and they had all of the platforms available to them. The people that were being canceled and censored were the proud boys, the alt right, Red Ice, trs, Richard Spencer, people like myself. Did Ben Shapiro, did the people at cpac, did the Blaze. Did any of them ever stick up for us? No. No. Because they were in a handshake agreement with the far left. The far left wants the far right destroyed. And that means that you get this very moderate and weak and flaccid center right that isn't really a threat. The center right allows this because then they are protected on their right flank. Whereas someone like myself would challenge Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro and say, you're not right wing enough, you're not pure enough, you're not giving the people what they want. Whereas we would ordinarily be in competition on the college campus, on the social platform, now we are taken out of the equation and now there's no competition. Think about it. For many years, who did Ben Shapiro have to compete with? Nobody. Because everybody else was banned from Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. For the better part of the last decade, it was the institutional center right, establishment right wingers that literally cut deals with Facebook. And they were the biggest ad providers. Daily Wire was the second biggest ad buyer on Facebook for like five years. They cut deals with Google. And the deal was that as long as they didn't say anything conspiratorial about the vaccine or the pandemic, they, they would keep their channels. Meanwhile, everybody else got cut down for one thing or another. Election denial, Covid conspiracy, antisemitism, white nationalism, whatever. So that was always. They were always in bed together. That, that's the irony. The center right will say that the far right is paid by the feds, the far right is controlled by the far left. Or they'll say something like, the far left and far right are in a symbiotic relationship. They'll say that the far left funds right wing extremism because Right wing extremism creates the impetus for far left action. In other words, if the far left funds the Ku Klux Klan and the Ku Klux Klan does a big visible public rally, then the. The far left is gonna say, oh my gosh, the Klan is on the rise. We need to give the SPLC more money. And people say the same thing about the adl. They say that people that criticize Israel are actually friends with the ADL because the more vocal and visible and sensational the antisemitism is, the greater the need and the greater the funding for the adl. And so, so this is a claim by the center right that, that the far right and the far left are in a symbiotic mutualistic relationship. The reality is the opposite. The center right is in a mutualistic relationship with the far left. And here is the case in point. For years, the far left was putting the screws in the far right with censorship, with doxing antifa showing up and disrupting the rallies, using violence, calling down federal law enforcement on the far right. And the center right stood by and watched and in many cases participated in this. It was not a few times that center right figures would pass along things that I had said or information about me to far left groups so that then they could sabotage me and basically do the dirty work of the center right. And the reason that you know this is because the center right always uses the language of the far left. When the center right wants to cancel the far right, what do they say about us? They say we're the real Nazis, we're the real clan, we're the real white nationalists. We're really engaged in hate speech. And that's why we have to go. Sean Hannity said that on his program this week. Mark Levin said it this week. Both Hannity and Mark Levin said on their shows, Nick Fuentes needs to be censored. Sean Hannity said I should not have a platform. Mark Levin said we should censor more hate speech. Well, who drives all of that? Who is driving hate speech legislation? Who's driving even, let's say, the monitoring of hate speech? Who's on that far right beat that's creating all of the hysteria about that? It's the far left. So on the contrary, and this is why I said we need to talk about me in particular. And then this conversation in general, there is this ongoing dialectical conversation about the far left, the far right, the center left, the center right and how they're all interacting. And that is the narrative that people are uncritically consuming. I'm sure you've heard it before. People say that really, anybody to the right of Tucker Carlson must be a federal operative. Anybody to the right of Sarah Palin, anybody to the right of Sean Hannity is a fed or is, like Tucker himself says, they're in a symbiotic relationship with the adl. They're simply creating the crisis that the far left is there to address. But when you actually think about it, deep down, it, it couldn't be further from the truth. It's actually the opposite. And that is the narrative that we saw over the past week. Which is what exactly? All of the pro Trump influencers, which, let's just say it, Trump is center right. The Republican Party, the MAGA movement, the Trump movement is center right. It just is. They're not immigration extremists, they're not isolationists, they're not even social conservatives. How many gay men are in the Trump, Trump administration? They support government funding of ivf. They gave up on abortion. They're not even social conservatives. They're saying about immigration, we only wanna remove the criminals. We don't want a mass deportation anymore. They gave up on the border wall. We're in a war with Iran. Which was cheered on by all the legacy press. So the institutional right, establishment rights, center right, Republican Party, Trump, they are the center right. Everybody that is supporting the Trump movement is center right. And all those influencers are now saying, we have this SPLC indictment. And they're saying, well, well, well, Charlottesville was funded by the left. The far right extremists were funded by the left. And they're licking their chops and they're saying, see, see, we told you so. Anything to the right of Trump, anything critical of Trump, in other words, anything right of the center, anything critical of the center is actually an operation. It's illegitimate. You can't trust it. Don't look at it, don't go there. But it is just true. I would say in the first place, the SPLC is, is funding a handful of informants in basically defunct organizations. Have you even heard of any of these? Have you ever even heard of the National Alliance? I have, cuz I'm in the far right. But that's basically a defunct organization and has been the Klan. When's the last time you saw a Klan rally? Is a Klan really an operative force in American politics? No. National Socialist movement. All these groups at the SPLC had informants in are basically irrelevant, first of all. Second of all, I don't even think it's necessarily A lie to say that they were funding those informants to gather intelligence, because that is what the SPLC does. So I don't even consider that to be relevant to the conversation. It's not like they were funding afpac. They weren't funding the Groipers, they weren't funding the Proud Boys, they weren't funding InfoWars. They weren't funding, in other words, any of the groups that would be considered right of center and politically effective or viable or legitimate. They were not involved in any of that. It was all of the fringe skinhead type stuff from maybe 20 or 30 years ago. But more to the point, they like to say, well, the SPLC in the far right, they're two sides of the same coin. There's this horseshoe. And I wanna focus on something specifically. This is something that Tucker Carlson has said not about this, but about actually the adl. This is an idea which you hear all the time. Tucker told me in person. He said, Netanyahu likes you. And I almost wanna say, well, how do you know that? What do you talk to him? But he says, Netanyahu likes you. And I know that. He goes, and the ADL likes you. And I know that. And he says on his show, why does the adl. Why do Netanyahu, why do they like the so called real anti Semites? Because the so called real antisemites create the pretext for the ADL to pass hate speech laws for the ADL and groups like it to attract donors, to attract sponsorship, to carry out their various programs. It creates the need for the adl. But I would say that obviously when you look at the nature of ADL and the far right, SPLC in the far right. How can it be considered symbiotic or mutually beneficial when the ADL and SPLC are censoring us? In other words, if they had it their way, we would be dead. How could I be in a symbiotic relationship with the SPLC if they're posting my address on the Internet? If they had it their way, someone would come to my house and kill me. Someone tried to. And if I answered the door, he would have shot me in the face and I would be dead. So how is that a mutualistic relationship? If the ADL had it their way, I would be banned on Twitter. They got me banned on Twitter the same week that I was banned in July 2021. They, the ADL, put out an article about me. Five things you need to know about Nick Fuentes. And that is how I was banned on Twitter. That is how I was banned on PayPal, Stripe on every major platform. In other words, if they had it their way, we would not exist. We would not have funding, we would not have a megaphone, we would not even be alive. If they had it their way, we would be gone. And why is that? Because what we are putting out there is contrary to their message. If we are winning, what does winning constitute for us? It means that we are creating an electorate or we're creating an entryist movement in government that is going to oppose Israel, liberalism, Jewish power, all these different things. The civil rights regime, which sounds bad if you say you oppose that, but the civil rights regime is very far reaching. Um, if we have it our way, we're going to politically overturn all of those things. That is why they exist. We are in a war with them. We're in a battle. And so that's like saying if the United States kills the Ayatollah, we're in a symbiotic relationship with Iran because every IRGC member we kill, they. That's recruitment for them. And every time they close the Strait of Hormuz, that creates a pretext for the United States to. Whatever. Just because you're in a pitched conflict does not mean there's a mutually beneficial relationship. Let's examine, however, the relationship between adl, SPLC and the center right. Why are the ADL and the SPLC not interested in the center right? Because the center right does, does not oppose the political ends of the ADL and the splc. What are the political ends, for example, of the adl? Well, they're very clear in their mission statement. ADL says our job is to protect Jewish people from anti Semitism and to support the state of Israel. Well, the center right believes in all of that. The center right is liberal. So that means when you see a cabal of Jewish oligarchs taking over America, they call that a meritocracy. They say there's nothing wrong with that. God bless Sheldon Adelen for making his fortune in casinos and then using hundreds of millions of dollars to bribe politicians. That's his right as an American. As liberals, they will not identify Jews as a distinct group because liberalism says that we're all individuals, we're all a blank slate. As liberals, they will never identify Jews as a separate, distinct nation with a meaningful identity, a meaningful sense of togetherness, a sense of nationhood, of Jewishness, and how that is going to influence society with Jews acting as a whole. They'll never identify that. And so that is why they will always support the civil rights regime which protects Jews and their ascension through the institutions and their collective action. As a group, the center right will never oppose Israel. Why? Because the center right is funded by Israel. Who is the center right funded by? Fox News, Wall Street Journal, New York Post, are all owned by Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch is friends with Netanyahu, funded Netanyahu's reelection campaign five years ago. Those are all the center right publications. What else do you have? The Blaze, Blaze tv merger of the Blaze and crtv. That's run by Glenn Beck, who cried because Israel wouldn't give him citizenship. He said God gave him a mission and that's to defend Israel. Breitbart, which used to be great. Now the editor in chief is Joel Pollock, who broke the Sabbath to say kill all Palestinians on October 7th. He's a Jew immigrant from South Africa who studied Jewish studies at university and converted his black wife to. To Judaism. That's Fox, the Journal, the New York Post, the Blaze, CRTV and Breitbart. Then you've got Daily Wire. Need I say more? That's your center right. So who's really in a symbiotic relationship with the far left? The far left, if they had it their way, would kill the far right. And they have. The far left has waged a war against the far right to censor and docs, cancel, kill, maim, all these things. The center right has been complicit in all of this, has been immune from all of those things. And that is because the far right is meaningfully opposed to the far left, whereas the center right is not the center right. Even to the extent that they will go out on a limb and they will criticize Israel or the Jews or the civil rights regime, they will do all of it within a liberal framework. So, for example, when they talk about replacement migration, they don't say white people are being replaced by non white people. And there is. There's an element of the whole here. There's an element of identity here. America as a white nation is different than America as a non white nation. And it's not because of culture. It's not because of ideas or entrepreneurship or the Bill of Rights. It's because we're different. Tribes are real, Race is real. We're not born as individuals on a blank slate. We carry with us a genetic inheritance. Our behaviors, our physical traits, our cognitive traits are genetic as well as. As learned as well as environmental. And. And maybe it's 50, 50. Maybe it's more genetic than it is environmental. That's an that's an illiberal idea. The center right will say we don't oppose replacement migration because whites are being replaced by non whites. And they will say we oppose replacement migration because, you know, their values are different or it's a voting rights issue or they need time to assimilate everything other than what it is. And the same goes for Jewish power. Will they say that we have a Jewish power problem in America? That Jews as a collective have too much influence and that Jews because of their identity abused or influence for their own tribe rather than the nation as a whole? No, they never say that. They say it's not about Jews, it's not about Judaism, it's not even about Israel. They say it's about Netanyahu and Netanyahu's government and the things he's doing. And if it wasn't for that, we wouldn't have a problem. Well, again, that's not true. And by the way, the ADL doesn't even disagree with that. The ADL and the splc, they don't like Netanyahu even either. They work institutionally with Israel, institutionally with Jewish oligarchs in America. So in other words, the center right is not even really saying things that the far left disagrees with at all and that's why they don't oppose one another. So this is your SPLC indictment. These are some of the bigger ideas. Like I said, as far as the actual indictment is concerned. I'm not a lawyer and people say that the, the actual charges and are on shaky legal ground. I don't know that the fraud charges are going to stick. I don't know that it's going to deliver a death blow to the splc. Either way, I support it. I think the DOJ should be doing more of this. I think the DOJ should bring charges against all these far left groups, splc, adl, Media Matters, all of them. Because these are the various organs of the left that are preventing the rise of the far right. If it wasn't for the far left, we would have free reign. I mean, are you kidding me? I think about all the things I have had to put up with over the years in the form of debanking, censorship, taking away credit card processing, all the problems they have created, even just the guilt by association, the smear campaign. If the far left were out of the picture, we would have a very easy time at everything. So the Trump administration should really be doing a lot more. It should not just be some Nicky Knack fraud charge against the splc. It should be comprehensive. They should all pay like this. And I do support it. But to me, the bigger picture, like what's the story? The Trump administration should fight the left more obviously. The bigger story is about how this has now been used and now this has become a narrative among the pro Trump influencers. And now they like to say, see, all that exists is, is the far left and the Trump movement. If you're not voting for Trump, if you're not glazing Trump, if you're not defending everything Trump does, then you're with the left. And what that implicitly says is there are no enemies to the right. And don't mistake what I mean by that. This is a Straussian idea. That's their playbook. They say there is nothing to our right if we have enemies. They are more left wing than usual. There is nothing more far right than the Trump movement. And that is not true. There is something more far right than the Trump movement. Trump is not the be all, end all of the far right. Obviously, if you've been watching my show for a long time, you know that. And if you have a clue, Trump movement is not doing what the far right wants. But they will categorize and say anything that's far right is actually on the left. It may appear to be far right, it may appear to be more right wing than Trump, but in actuality, it's third world. In actuality, it's funded by the left. In actuality, it's a mirage. And it exists to create a pretext for far left organizations. And all of these are little discrediting, delegitimizing lies so that nobody looks for a better option, so that the masses stay on the plantation, shrug their shoulders and say, this is as good as it gets. I guess we're only going to vote Republican. But my ideology is loyalty to Trump. The unironic, most right wing thing you can do is vote for Republicans. All you could do is vote for Republicans and that's it. And the far right will say, no. We need entry ism, we need infiltration. We need people to become very far right. We need the best and brightest young men with energy to get involved in politics and to ascend the ladder in power. And yes, the splc, ADL are going to be our biggest enemies. I'm their biggest enemy. And that's why, you know, the people that I influence, they try to get those people fired. And they're out there. We have, we have personnel all over the government, all over society. And the SBLC would love to get their hands on that because they want to hurt those people. Cuz those people actually oppose their ideological ends. They're not worried about John Doyle, they're not worried about how many of these other people, Laura Loomer, the rest of them, they're just not worried about that. So anyway, that's the SPLC indictment and I think that's everything I have to say about it. We're gonna move on. We're gonna talk a little bit about the situation in Iran. I don't know how much time we're gonna spend on that. I think we're almost out of time here, but we're gonna get into a little bit. It's been a few weeks since we covered the situation in Iran. I think the last time we spoke was the beginning of April. It was right about when the ceasefire broke out. And the big update about the war in Iran is that there is no major update. We are still in the same state of affairs that we were three weeks ago. And I'll reconstruct the timeline for you just very briefly. We'll read through some of the latest developments and then we'll talk about potentially where this is going. So the last time we spoke, the cease fire had just been declared. It was on a Tuesday, it was actually three weeks ago to the day. And this brought an end to all of the offensive US Operations against Iran. Whereas for about seven weeks the United States was engaged in this extremely intense air campaign, naval campaign against Iran, its navy, its regime, its military. All of that came to an end three weeks ago when, when a very contentious cease fire agreement was announced. And the terms of the agreement were these. It effectively said that as long as Iran opened the Strait of Hormuz, then the United States would end military operations. This would take place for a period of two weeks for the purpose of reaching a comprehensive long term peace agreement that addresses the, the systematic issues of the Strait of Hormuz, the nuclear issue, missiles proxies, and the continuity of the Iranian regime. That was the original terms of the cease fire. And the important points are again opening up the strait in exchange for a cessation of hostilities for the purpose of finding an agreement. Those are the three big parts of that agreement. Now you might remember that before we left the, that agreement effectively fell apart. And almost immediately there was a big debate about what the terms of the deal even were. Iran and Pakistan, which brokered the deal, seemed to be under the impression that included in the cease fire was also a ceasefire in Lebanon. Israel had engaged Hezbollah in a major military campaign in southern Lebanon had displaced over a million people. Iran and Pakistan said almost an hour, two hours after the ceasefire was announced that the ceasefire did not just apply to the fighting in Iran and in the Persian Gulf, but also to the theater in Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah. Well, the United States came out the following day and said that is not a part of the deal and Israel would not agree to a ceasefire in Lebanon. And so as quickly as the deal was announced, it was rescinded. And Iran came out and said, well, if there's no ceasefire in Lebanon, then we were closing the straight again, which they then did. And the straight was open for all of a few days before it shut right back down. The United States denied this was happening, but it became obvious after a few days that following weekend, there was a series of negotiations in Islamabad and Pakistan that Saturday. So this is again two weeks ago from this previous Saturday. J.D. vance, Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff traveled to the capital of Pakistan to meet with the delegation from Iran to negotiate this comprehensive agreement that was the purpose of the cease fire. Well, the negotiations went on all day and all night, and in the end they didn't reach an agreement at all. And actually the Iranian delegation was so insulted, they said, there is no basis for diplomacy. We're not going to make a deal with the United States. They're being unreasonable. And so Iran effectively pulled out of negotiations. Throughout that following week, there was all sorts of talk about another round of negotiations any day that Thursday, that weekend. It never materialized. Finally, the second week of the ceasefire approached. This is last week, and still there were no negotiations. There was supposed to be a last minute round of negotiations in Pakistan that was called off. The ceasefire was set to expire. And again, even though none of the conditions were reached, Strait of Hormuz remains closed, no comprehensive agreement. And actually there weren't even negotiations ongoing last week. Trump extended the cease fire indefinitely. So even though that two week period was set to draw down last week, even though Iran did not abide by any of the terms, straight is closed, no negotiations, no comprehensive agreement, no progress towards one. Trump unilaterally said last week, well, the ceasefire is extended and it is extended without limits. There is no timeline anymore. And what's interesting about this is that for this entire time, let's say this period of the past six weeks, we had been operating on these rolling deadlines and rolling timelines. You had the week before Easter, Trump said that Iran had 48 hours, 48 hours to open up the straight or else we would escalate the energy campaign to attack Iran's civilian infrastructure. And then that 48 hour deadline was extended by five days and then 10 days, and then by 24 hours, then we were under a two week cease fire. And then after the two week cease fire, it has now been extended indefinitely. And so this is why I say, when you consider the war in Iran, if you actually approach the official White House statements, true social posts, press releases, the official government line for the past, however long that has been, is that we have been on this rolling deadline 48 hours, 5 days, 10 days, 24 hours, 2 weeks. We have been in this protracted negotiation to end the war. And that's why we're not escalating. That's why we're not continuing hostilities. That's why we're engaging Iran in diplomacy. And yet all this time, nothing has changed. The United States is spinning its wheels, creating deadlines, talking about escalation, talking about terms of negotiation, and yet not one single thing has changed. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed ever since that first deadline was announced. These negotiations have meaningfully not happened. Ever since that first deadline was announced. We're supposed to believe that the United States has been either winding down the operation or refraining from escalating because we're waiting on this diplomatic process to prevail. Because Iran has been making concessions, because they're making commitments to open up the straight. And yet none of that has happened. Straight is closed, no negotiations. Now that we're in this new period, you have to ask, what is even the official line at this point? I think we all recognize that all of those deadlines that existed before were a form of a bluff. It was all bluster. You better do what we want or else. And everybody knew that we weren't actually serious about following through on these threats. All of this was an attempt to either buy time so that we can mobilize more resources or solicit help from other allies, buy time so that the oil markets could adjust and alleviate some of the pain in the markets. Everybody recognized that despite what was being said about a diplomatic breakthrough, about a prospect for a deal or negotiations, we all recognize this was just buying time. But now here we are since last week, and now you don't even know what the official line is exactly. Straight is closed, no negotiations. And yet we're not bombing them. There's no threat of escalation on the table, and, and there's no negotiations. There's no prospect for a deal to happen. And yet we're in an open ended Ceasefire. Now, this is the latest. This is from the New York Times. The one thing that has changed is that ever since the ceasefire was extended, the United States has imposed its own blockade over Iran. So Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz to shipping that is friendly to the United States. Any shipping that does not coordinate with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and pay a $2 million toll or a $1 per barrel of oil toll will not be permitted to transit the strait. While that has been happening, Iran has still been engaging in seaborne trade. So Iran has still been exporting oil, importing things from other countries. They have slowed down and shut down shipping in the strait for. For every other country. Well, since the ceasefire was extended, this is how the calculation has changed. The United States has imposed a naval blockade of its own. And so now, from a distance, we are effectively doing the same thing to Iran that Iran is doing to us. Whereas Iran was shutting down seaborne shipping of oil, natural gas and other things for allied US Countries, now we are shutting down all the seaborne trade for Iran and all their major ports. So they're not able to export their oil and they're not able to import the goods that they need. And so this Trump believes and the White House believes will reverse the economic pressure. Instead of having the United States and the global oil markets affected by Iran's closure of the strait, we're flipping the script. And now we're going to put economic pressure on Iran's economy, but by shutting down their six major naval ports in the Persian Gulf. Now, this is a story. This is from the New York Times about the latest development. The development from this week is that Iran has put forward a new proposal. And what Iran is now saying is that they will open up the strait as before, except that now they're going to retain control over it and they're going to charge a toll in perpetuity. They're saying the strait will open. However, it will be a controlled strait and there will be a new legal regime governed by Iran. And the other country that borders the strait, Oman. They will determine which ships go in and out and they will have the ability to charge money. They'll be able to collect on this. Iran says that in return, the United States has to withdraw its forces from the Middle east and we have to shelve all of the nuclear negotiations. Iran says that we will consider nuclear enrichment, highly enriched uranium another day, they say, but we will bring an end to the war by opening the straight. But we're going to control it. Now, the United States has rejected that proposal and says that the cease fire will go on indefinitely, but the blockade will go along with it, too. And this is a story from the Times. It says, quote, president Trump has told advisors he is not satisfied with Iran's latest proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war. The proposal called on the United States to end its naval blockade, but would have set aside questions about what to do with Iran's nuclear program. Iran has repeatedly rejected American proposals to suspend its nuclear program and hand over its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Mr. Trump reviewed the proposal with advisors on Monday after Iran's foreign minister delivered it to Pakistan on Sunday. Mr. Trump rejected another proposal from Iran last week and called off a round of peace talks in Islamabad over the weekend. U.S. officials say Iran's leadership has not authorized negotiators to make concessions on the nuclear deal, which frustrates any attempts to forge a compromise or peace agreement. Delaying nuclear talks could have been a way to reach a quick agreement to ease pressure on global energy and financial markets. But any decision to halt nuclear talks would be a sign that the war had failed to achieve one of its major goals, which is increasing pressure on Tehran to make a deal over its enrichment program. Iranian officials insisted that any deal to open the strait should allow them to continue to impose a tax or fee on ships that transit it. At the heart of the debate over whether to accept the proposal, where discussions in the Trump administration about economic leverage and what further American military operations would be needed to get Iran to make significant concessions in negotiations. Some officials believe that continuing the blockade for two more months would cause significant long term damage to Tehran's energy industry. Oil wells cannot be turned on and off and would be damaged if they were forced to shut down, incurring costly repairs. Other administration officials have said that assessment is flawed and noting that Iran's positions have hardened and that the IRGC has solidified its hold on power. So this is where we are at and like I said, nothing has realistically changed in the past three weeks. And the situation is basically this. We have no options. We can't escalate militarily. We cannot nuke them, we cannot invade them, we cannot invade Carg island, we cannot bomb them into submission. There is realistically no military solution to compel Iran to change its behavior. So what they have come up with instead, because they've been looking for a way to do this in a way that is minimal. And this is a conversation from three weeks ago. If we were to, for example, bomb their civilian Infrastructure, that that might be a military solution. That might be a military option that could compel them to come to the negotiating table and make concessions. If we were to bomb their power grid, bomb their energy infrastructure, that might be a military option that will get them to beg for peace. But if we do that, they retain the capability to do the same thing to Saudi Arabia and the UAE and Qatar and Kuwait and Bahrain. And that would devastate not only all those countries, but the global economy. So that's off the table. So the Trump administration was looking for another option. Maybe we will invade one of their islands, we'll invade Carg island, we'll invade Hormuz island, we'll try to use a ground force, maybe we'll deploy forces inside of Iran. But then they determined that if we tried that Iran would just kill everybody. Because if Iran has enough drones and missiles with precision to shut down shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, surely they can use those drones and missiles to kill everybody that tries to land on one of those small islands or anybody that lands inside of the Iranian mainland. So they ruled that out. That's too risky. So if we don't have any economic warfare, military options, if we don't have any options to do a minimal ground invasion, what can we do to compel them to come to the table? So now Trump has found this new option, which is an economic blockade. If we impose a naval blockade on Iran's ports, then we can squeeze their economy and without bombing their energy infrastructure, if we shut down their oil exports, then their oil industry will grind to a halt and it will cost them hundreds of millions of dollars because that will cause damage to the infrastructure and there'll be lost revenue. So the idea is, without a kinetic military option, we going to increase the pressure on Iran's economy in a way that is less invasive. Well, here's the problem with this. So that that is realistically the current situation is that the strait is closed and the pressure is on the United States. We have now imposed a blockade of our own, shutting down all of Iran's seaborne trade to put some pressure on them. They're waiting us out. We're going to try to wait them out. They're hoping that the economic pain of the closure of the strait will force us to leave them alone and walk away. We are hoping that the pain of closing the straight for them will cause them to come to the negotiating table. Now, the Trump administration realistically can't leave the conflict without some kind of tangible victory. Here. We set out to Achieve regime change, seize their highly enriched uranium, shut down their nuclear centrifuge to shut down their missile program, shut down their proxy network. We have achieved none of these things, so we cannot leave unless we get something. So what we are doing is keeping this going at a low boil. The pressure's on us, but the pressure is also on them. And we're going to try to wait them out so that Iran eventually comes to us and makes concessions on their nuclear program. Now, what are those concessions going to be? Well, there's not a lot of room for negotiation. The Trump administration says they have to give up all their highly enriched uranium and they have to give up all their enrichment activity. There's no wiggle room. There's no gray area. They cannot retain any of it for any period of time, can't dilute it, which Iran is never gonna give up. On Iran's side, all they have to do is wait us out. All they have to do is basically call Trump's bluff. They know this is hurting us more than it's hurting them. And Trump administration officials themselves say it's not gonna work. We have no military options. Even if we restarted the bombing, it's not gonna fix anything. Even if we restarted the war, it's not gonna change their behavior. And even if we blockade all their ports, it's not gonna put enough pressure on the regime to capitulate. And that is because since the war started, the IRGC has actually consolidated more power than they had before the war started. So what it is looking like in the future is that the Trump administration is gonna have to just walk away. It's not gonna work. Iran is still putting out proposals and telling us, look, we are not talking about nuclear. We're not giving anything up. And as a matter of fact, we don't even want to talk about it anymore. We don't want to talk about our missiles, our proxies. The regime isn't going anywhere. And the nuclear issue, we're never giving it up. They said last week. They said our right to nuclear enrichment is no different than our right to our own soil. They said it is just as sacred as our right to our own territory. We're never giving it up. And that is what they have said. They said, we are never giving up enrichment. We. We are never giving up our highly enriched uranium. And the Trump administration can accept nothing less than exactly that. So what does that mean? It means that the current situation will prevail. The straight will remain closed, the blockade will remain in place, and ultimately it is on either Tehran or Washington to blink first. And time is working against us. It is all of our allied countries that are hurting because, because of this. It is Europe, it is our allies in the Pacific. They are facing the fuel shortages because of this. And ultimately that is going to affect the United States economy and political situation, which is far more precarious and fragile than the situation inside Iran. In Iran, they don't have a democracy. In Iran, their people know they're in an existential war for their survival. Iron over here. This is a war of choice. Most Americans don't support this. Most Americans don't even care. So if in Iran the Iranian regime is going to impose on people rationing and shortages of vital goods and the economy's going to get worse, well, one, they have an iron grip on power and two, their people know the situation, which is it's either this or it's total destruction and no sovereignty. Over here we have an election in seven months where the Republicans are very unpopular. And what's more, Americans don't wanna pay $5 for a gallon of gas to support a war of choice to pursue regime change for a limited nuclear deal in Iran. It's just not something that Americans have a political appetite for. So once again, just like over the previous three weeks and the other deadlines before that, this is yet another bluff. Just like for the past month when Trump was saying we are going to bomb you like you've never been bombed before. We're going to target your power plants and bridges and infrastructure. That was a bluff. And so is this. The administration says we're going to prepare for a long term blockade. He's, they're planting stories in the press and they're leaking to the media saying we, we're prepared to go the distance. We're settling in to blockade the Straight in perpetuity and we're good. Which is shutting down the straight. We're not talking anymore. And Trump thinks that Iran is gonna buy that and they're gonna say, oh well, we better make a deal now. Trump is gonna blockade the straight in perpetuity. This is gonna cause problems for us. Just one problem. Iran is working with every other country to alleviate all this pressure. Vi, they have just opened up six new border crossings with Pakistan so that land trade can continue. And Russia says they are prepared to help Iran with whatever they need strategically. So in the meantime, as long as you are in this, as long as we're playing this waiting game of waiting for Iran to come to the table, get off their red line, give us Everything we want. In the meantime, they're being resupplied. They're probably building more drones. They have gone to work rebuilding their missile production facilities. They're probably building more drones. And so what is bound to happen is that whenever Trump or Netanyahu gets tired of the waiting game, we are going to provoke hostilities all over again. There's no limited military option. A resumption of the same kind of hostilities is not going to change anything. This blockade is a farce. They know it, we know it. They know we know it. And so probably what is happening is that. And again, time is the operative variable here. We are watching as Iran is consolidating power, Iranian Revolutionary Guard is consolidating power. They're rebuilding whatever was destroyed. They found a number of unexploded US Ordinance and they're reverse engineering that. They're getting back to work. They're preparing for the next round. And, and in the meantime, what is the United States doing while they tell the press, while they tell the Wall Street Journal that they're settling in for a long blockade? They have deployed a third aircraft carrier strike group to the Middle East. And so now, for the first time since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, you have three carrier strike groups active and deployed in the same region in the Middle east at the same time. You got a ton of military transport aircraft headed to the Middle East. What it looks like they're not serious about a ceasefire. They're not serious about the blockade. Probably they're restocking and reloading and they're getting ready to hit Iran all over again. And Trump has been insinuating for some time saying we're just gonna bomb them again. Those that don't wanna make a deal, we're just gonna kill em. I don't mind an invasion. He said, I'm not, I don't have the yips, he said about boots on the ground. What it's looking like is quietly, maybe while they're reassuring the energy markets, maybe, maybe they're pursuing diplomacy on some level. If the Iranian offer now is, listen, we'll, we'll open up the straight, just leave us alone. Maybe they're still pursuing that seriously, but unless they get that nuclear concession, we're going back to war. And I would imagine maybe sooner rather than later, because we are up against the clock with the midterms coming up in November. So that seems to be where all of this is headed. But it's hard to know what the strategic thinking is exactly inside the White House because Up until this point, we haven't actually gotten any. Any kind of straight talk about this since the beginning. You know, as we've talked about, there was a pretty clear idea at the very beginning that we were gonna pound them as hard as possible, the regime is gonna collapse, and then we're going to extract all these concessions and we're going to change the character of the regime. That was the idea at the beginning, but the moment that it became clear that would not happen. Now we just have no clue what the strategy is. It's typical Trump. What do they call it? It's typical Taco. Trump always chickens out, which is these maximalist demands, empty and hollow threats, deadlines that are always being extended. You know, doing all this diplomacy in the media on true social by public statement, by press release. And so it's hard, actually to peg the administration where they're gonna go with this. But I think that you would not be deploying more aircraft carriers to the region if you were done with hostilities. Currently, you got the Lincoln, the ford, and the H.W. bush all off the coast of the Middle East. I don't know that you would be deploying an additional carrier strike group if the goal was to add, end the war as quickly as possible, like they said today, declare victory unilaterally and just finish the conflict. I don't think we're gonna go that way, but I guess we'll have to watch and see what happens this week. But that's that. We're gonna move on. We're gonna take a look at our super chats. We'll see what you guys have to say about all this. Like I said, kind of a slow. Kind of a slow news week tonight. Not too much going on foreign. We're gonna get set up here. We'll take a look. We'll see what we got here. All right, let's see.
- [89:34]
B
Fashion expert Miss Kitty sent $20. I love you.
- [89:37]
A
Hey, thanks. I appreciate it. I guess.
- [89:40]
B
Jan, Michael Vincent sent $20. Any update on intern applications?
- [89:44]
A
You'll hear from us, I promise you.
- [89:46]
B
I love that silencer. AF sent $100. Here's part of my penance. Glad you had a great trip. Looking lean king. Fire emoji, fire emoji, Fire emoji.
- [89:55]
A
Hey, thank you for the big super chat. I appreciate it. Yeah, yeah, I leaned out a little bit. I got a little bit lean. Yeah, the trip was pretty good. I appreciate it, buddy.
- [90:05]
B
Castro sent $50. We need to get you a plaque next to David Hasselhoff at North Campus.
- [90:09]
A
I know, dude. I mean, the people that have a plaque at North Campus, it's just honestly disgraceful. Like, there's people that, like, have no public profile, haven't even done anything. I think it's time. I think I'm a little bit prominent enough at my high school. At the North Campus, they have a wall of fame. What is it? I guess it's like the hall of fame wall of fame, and they have, like, these plaques for all the famous alumni. David Hasselhoff went to my high school. He's up there. I don't know anybody else that's even up there. We should start a campaign. We should start a campaign at the high school. Get the plaque on the wall.
- [90:45]
B
I think it's time bogey sent $50. Did you see Cloud bought property for 5 meters with high awake Night Hess, an Israeli mob member and was convicted in the past. Why do you associate with him? Helix Planet and got his chance to be in the industry?
- [90:57]
A
I did see that, yeah. I'm a little bit disappointed. Yeah. He's operating, I think. What publication was this? It was one of these. One of these things reported earlier today, because I didn't even think that was true. I. I saw one of the clipping accounts say Clavicular made a deal with an Israeli billionaire scammer and that's how they opened up the club. And I didn't even think that was real. I thought that was just exaggerated or something. But then I saw an actual news source report. No, it is an Israeli mobster. It's some Israeli billionaire or something. That's who they're in business with. And, you know, look, Israel, in fairness, Clavicular always said he only cares about mogging. You can't hold it against him. You just can't. Because he always said, I don't care about politics, I don't care about America. He said, I only care about mogging. Like, nobody can feel betrayed by that. People say, oh, now Clavicular is doing this, now he's doing that. What do you mean, now? He has always been consistent. They asked him, what do you think about trannies? He. He said, one less person I have to worry about, one less person that will never mog me. That's who we're dealing with here. Monomaniacal. Focus on looks and mogging. So, you know, in fairness, nobody can feel betrayed and nobody can feel like they got caught by surprise here. He always told us what he was about. With that being said, obviously, I believe in morality and ethics, and I don't think that's ethical. I Don't think it's good to get involved with some of the stuff he's involved with. And it's his life, obviously. He's his own man and he's got his own code and everything. I get it, but obviously I don't. I don't approve. But I'm not his dad, so he can do whatever he wants. I like him even though he's doing all that. Look, it. Not everything has to be super political, you know? Why do you associate? I love. I love. That's my favorite question that I love when people interrogate me. Why do you associate? What does that even mean by the way? You know, I don't even know what that means because I believe in the world. I live in the world among people. What does that even mean? Who do we. Who do. Who am I allowed to associate with? Do I have to associate only with people that I agree with everything they do? How they make their money, how they live their lives? It's ridiculous. I live in the world. I associate with people that I find interesting. I associate with people that I find interesting, with people that I like, with people that I get along with, with people that benefit me in some way. You know? Why. Why do. Why does anybody associate with anybody? Because we live in the world, because we live in a society. So I'm very. I. I hate this idea of, like, no, associate. Don't associate with so and so. As if, like, by virtue of acknowledging their existence or something, I'm. I'm somehow complicit in their actions. I don't see it that way. Uh, but I. I like him and I support him. I don't give a. I still support him. Because you know what? It's not about that. It. Honestly, it doesn't even matter. He's not political. What clavicular is, is a social, cultural phenomenon. And it's just true, because what he represents is the answer to hypergamy. What is the answer to a world where Instagram and Tinder and hypersexual women exist in? What is the answer to that? Men have to improve their looks. It's the only way to compete if you want to be sexually successful. And to be sexually successful is to be socially successful. And to be socially successful is to be professionally successful, successful and fulfilled. You have to improve your looks. And what does that mean? Well, first and foremost, it means getting skinny. It means being thin, being thin, getting a good haircut, being being groomed well, putting thought and intentionality into how you look. What the fuck is wrong with that? That's a good message. And that is a good message for young men. Because everybody is telling young men, you can do anything, you can be anything, work hard, play by the rules. And I like these new ideas where it says, look, the rules ain't helping anybody anymore. All these fanciful ideas we got from Hollywood about our limitless potential, all it leaves us is disappointed and brokenhearted and sad. When we were being told, you know, people, person with no arms and legs is being told, you could be anything you want. It's like, no, you're gonna be a vegetable your whole life. You're gonna be a nugget, bro. Right? Someone with no arms and legs is being told by Hollywood, hey, man, you could be anything. You could do anything. It's like, nope, your life is gonna suck. Cause you're a nugget. You know, and same thing with an ugly person. Someone is totally ugly. People go, yeah, but if you're like you, you just gotta be confident. You just gotta put yourself out there. It's like, no, no, you're just confident people are gonna reject you cause you're ugly. So what should you do? What is gonna work? What's actually gonna work? Improve yourself, improve your work on your game, work on your looks, make more money. That's going to improve your life. And so Clavicular is somebody who, you know, the looks maxing is overrated. People post like his high school pictures and it's like, okay, so he was like a handsome tall guy that hit puberty and then he got skinny. Okay, great. You know, but like that is the answer, which is to say that, look, here's a guy who went from zero to hero and it's because he improved his looks. Or at the minimum, improving his looks was a necessary precondition. I actually don't agree. It's not with him all looks. Cause there's, there's better looking guys than Clavicular. Is he the best looking man of all time? I don't even think he would say that. He, he's very good looking. But there's guys that are taller, better looking, you know, better charisma. He's a non neurotypical. But Clav has a suite of attributes. He's smart, he's original, he's funny, he's very good looking. And this is why he's this. And he has this idea. He is the embodiment and possessed by an idea. And ultimately that is the most powerful thing. Ideas are the most powerful thing. But it's, it's all those things. He needs all Those things. If he wasn't funny, it wouldn't work. If he wasn't good looking, it wouldn't work. If he was not possessed by the idea, he'd just be another one of these chuds. He'd just be like Varys or androgenic or, you know, the long line of clones. Why is Clavicular the brand name? Why is he the shelling point for looks maxing? It's because one, he's the first mover possessed by the idea, but also because he's smarter than your average guy. Funny, naturally entertaining, he's a good live streamer anyway. Um, but I, I think that he's a very powerful cultural totem. Very powerful for men, very powerful for white men. And I don't even care. I don't even care, you know? Yeah, there's some shady stuff going on there. Honestly, it's all shady. Everything is shady. Who gives a shit? And how many people are taking gambling deals? How many people are being paid under the table in some other way? And it's not to minimize it, but it's like, let's just take a week and get. I think a lot of the stuff he's doing is positive. What he represents is positive. So even though I don't obviously I don't co sign that and I don't support that. But you can't feel, you can't be betrayed because he said that he's only about mogging and you know, let's just take the good and forget about the bad. So that's how I feel about it. Why do you associate with him? You, who are you? You, you're, you're some boring loser. I love this idea that like, you know, if you're just some like boring loser and you're probably a degenerate anyway, but if you're just like some boring loser, it's like, well, you could associate with me because like, you know, I didn't do anything like that. It's like, but you're a boring loser. I want to associate with cool winners, not boring losers. I want to associate with cool winners and the kind of moralizing that's the last refuge of somebody that has nothing going on. I have nothing interesting to say. I'm not funny, I'm not outgoing, I have nothing going on. But hey, at least I'm not like Clav. Clav is doing a deal with Israeli billionaires. Yeah, okay, well, he's a cool winner. I like being with cool winners. I like being with cool, smart, good looking winners, not boring losers. That Complain you. You're associating with this guy. Yeah, okay. Whatever, dude.
- [99:46]
B
Groi pet groomer sent $30. Since you've leaned out so much, you should get arrested again so you can get a new mugshot.
- [99:51]
A
Yeah, maybe I should. Case dismissed. Case dismissed. Yeah. What do you think about that? Oh, man. Yeah. You see that? You see the latest? I gotta post something about that. Yeah, I won. Can I make this? How do I make this? Bigger pause. How do I make this? This always gives me trouble. I'm like a baby when it comes to clothes and stuff like this. Do I do it like this? Yes. Okay. Yeah. Case dismissed. You thought they thought they had me. Yeah. Maybe it's time for a new mug shot. Maybe I gotta beat the shit out of somebody else. Maybe I gotta beat the fuck outta somebody else so I could get a new mug shot. It's. It's time. Honestly, it's been too long. It's been too long since I kicked somebody's ass, so it might be time. How? What did we think? What do we think about the new hat? Get another.
- [100:53]
B
Jack Moxley sent $20. Why do women have to invent new words like hubby, hobbs and wifey? Are men not emasculated enough by feminist wives?
- [101:00]
A
Honestly, if you have a problem with that, you're kind of the problem. I think, you know, you should just. You should just count yourself lucky, you know, Hubby hubs. What's wrong with that? That's. Honestly. Listen, red pill is out. Red pill is out. Blue pill is in. Red pill is out. You know, this like, we're gonna bring women on and on him and say women are whores. That's out. That's out.
- [101:27]
B
We're done with that 6 or 7 mil cent, $100. Future Emperor Fuentes, while you were on your date with Candace, the group chat was wondering if you sleep on your back, belly or side. No homo.
- [101:35]
A
Ok. Well, thank you for the big super chat. I don't know if I really want to go there, but thanks a lot,
- [101:40]
B
Big Nibba grow at $20. Most prophetic dream you've had.
- [101:45]
A
Hmm. Oh, well. Most prophetic dream I've. I'm a dreamer. I do have lots of dreams. Most prophetic dream, probably the Groiper War dream. I told that story on the Jack Neal podcast. That was pretty prophetic.
- [101:59]
B
Sockless sent $100. My name is Azriel Montoya. I'm 36. I ordered a groy pat T shirt for my girlfriend and was wondering when it would be here. He has. How do I Ask the parents for their 13 year old daughter's hand in marriage.
- [102:09]
A
Very good. Thank you for the big super.
- [102:10]
B
Hussein Mobihill sent $20. My name is Azriel Montoya. After complete Nutrition Goy sent $50. Welcome back. Did you see the hit piece last Wednesday on the Washington Post? One of the poorest quality articles I've ever read. If you're gonna do a hit piece, at least write a compelling narrative.
- [102:22]
A
I did. Yeah, yeah, yeah. They're trying to say what? That I'm like, it's all over the place. They, you know, at once they're trying to say, like this is all the bad rhetoric. They're also trying to say, oh, you know, Christine from Ohio was poor and gave him too many super chats. It was all over the place. I'm not even sure what the message was, but yeah, it was a flop.
- [102:44]
B
Hussein wabi hill sent $20. My name is Azriel Montoya.
- [102:47]
A
Okay. I don't know.
- [102:47]
B
Structured light set, $111. The Pope, Nick Fuettes, Barack Obama and Candy meeting in Rome to devise a plan to take down Trump is wild. Someone please make AI slop. Hope you had a good break, King.
- [102:56]
A
Hey, thanks for the big super chat. Yeah, well, Laura Loomer is just totally insane. She's a total fucking idiot. She's like, well, so you know who else is from Chicago? Barack Obama. It's like you're just a fucking stupid idiot, man. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Pope Leo, Obama and me, well, we're all from Chicago, so we all know each other. Major metropolitan area, 10 million people, but yeah, like we all know each other. The Vatican, the Democrats and the groipers. Ok? She's the wor. She's honestly one of the worst human beings alive.
- [103:26]
B
Flippin Arkansas Groiper sent $20. I got accepted to an aviation program the same day you came back.
- [103:30]
A
Wow.
- [103:31]
B
Grants are paying 100%. Keep up the work, man. We love you.
- [103:33]
A
Well, congratulations. Love to hear it, man. Good stuff.
- [103:35]
B
RG131325 Seething. How TF do you buy a burger and coke and not get forced to take fries? Prompt, cheaper, even Kek k leats flow state.
- [103:43]
A
I know, dude, that's the problem. He's always in his witness consciousness. Time to wake up, nigga. He's always hanging out. You know, I, I talked to him like, what are you thinking about? Nothing. He's not never thinking about anything. Me, I'm always sitting there like deep in thought. I'm always sitting there like, you know, brooding and reminiscing and plotting. And Keith is literally just sitting there. Just, like, sitting there. He's just sitting there. He is not there. He is not with you. And there's something ironic about that. He's, like, mindful and present, and yet he's totally out there. He's just sitting there. He's just somewhere else. And then he's like, oh, my phone died. Oh, my phone just died. Oh, I left my sunglasses in the car. And it's like, yeah, maybe if you were being a little more mindful of those things, you know, I'm being mindful of my phone in my pocket. I'm mindful of the battery level. I'm mindful of my belongings in that locker that is unsecured. I'm mindful of my sunglasses, which I left in the glove compartment of the car or on the table in the restaurant. So, yeah. Yeah, that was crazy, dude. How do you mess it up that bad? He goes, what do you want? Hamburger, fries, coke comes back, mccrispy Coke. Like, we're one for three. One for three on the McDonald's order. But that's okay, you know, It's. It's good because he's a good friend, because you can't have two neurotic people. You can't have two neurotic people. Every friend group got the Every friend group got the transcendental meditator. Every friend group got the mindful transcendental meditator. And every friend group has a cluster b narcissist who is. What did he say? I'll say it today. You know what he told me? I never forgot this. He said this to me a few months ago. He said, I'm a better Christian than you. I said, no, you're not. I said, how are you a better. And, you know, he's not Christian. I'm like, how are you a better Christian than me? He goes, well, one, you hate, the poor you hate. You're consumed by lust, and you exalt raw power and dom and domination. I was like, well, that sounds like a pretty cool person, honestly. I said, maybe. And maybe that's true. I said, but that honestly sounds like a really cool person. And I don't know why you're clocking me like that. I don't know why you're reading me like this. I don't know what I ever did to you to deserve that. Every time I talk to him, it's always some, like, devastating attack on my ego. It's always like a starkiller base death star precision strike on my Sense of self. It's like, can't we just, like, hang out? So, yeah, this time he tells me, you have all the traits of someone with a cluster B personality disorder. I was like, well, what does that mean? What is that supposed to mean? He's, like, unstable. Sense of self. Fear of abandonment. And then he just started. Read that. He just started listing them one after the other. I was like, hey, man, can we just eat our pasta? Hey, man, can we just. Could we just enjoy our cappuccino? It's getting a little too real right now. But anyway, um. So, yeah, forgot the fries. But it's okay. I forgive him. I forgive him. Anyway, he got the filet of fish. Who does that? Even when we encountered. What do they call it? The Vatican paper published an article about it. I guess that, like, guy that tried to get me to move. I guess that's like a scam. So I. I was driving one of these little things, and I park and I'm chilling out, and this brown guy comes up and is like, you need to park somewhere else. You park over here. I'll show you. And I was like, get away from me. I don't know you. And then he crashes out on me. And. And then the Vatican, one of these Vatican newspapers did an article and said, I guess that's a scam. And the guy was Egyptian. And these Arabs hang out in Rome, and they try to get you to find a parking spot, and then they demand money. And you know what's really funny? You. You wanna know what's really funny? See, this is why I have problems, okay? This is why I'm a little bit nutty. So this clip goes out, and people see the interaction where I'm in this tiny car parked in the space, and the guy is trying to get me to move. All these stupid on Twitter are in the replies, and they're saying, nick is being kind of a jerk. He should have moved his car. That guy was trying to get him to move his car so another car could park. He was being a jerk. The guy's a scammer. It's a scam. He was dressed like a vagabond. He's a transient. He's some dirt bag. He's some human refuse, and he's a scammer. And you people try to gaslight me into thinking I'm a bad person. I rightly clocked the situation. I'm like, who is this vagabond? Why is this vagabond speaking to me? Why is this tramp yelling at me? Some disgusting dirty tramp comes out of nowhere and starts yelling at me. I correctly am like get outta my face. Get the away from me. I'm not mo. I don't know you. I'm not moving my car. And all of you dummies this. But that's what it is. All the dummies line up and they're like, hey man, you should have just moved your car. Why you being a dick? Why are you being a jerk? You should have moved your car. Cause it's a scam and you were born yesterday. People are telling me I'm a bad guy, getting in my head, oh, he should have just moved his car. This is why I have issues. Because it's like my gut is always right, especially about stuff like that. Yeah, people go, you should have just moved it. Yeah, well maybe you shouldn't travel alone because you're going to have some problems. That's it. I'm from Chicago. We don't play that. Homie don't play that. You know they said, oh the. In the article they acted like I got humbled by this guy. In this article they said Rome doesn't care if you're a live streamer. It's been here forever. They said Rome doesn't care if you're a. If you're famous or rich. Rome humbles everybody. Humbles everybody. It didn't work on me. It didn't work on me. They, they say that like I got chewed up and spit out by the city. I didn't fall for it. I stood my ground cuz I'm from Chicago. I'm from America. Don't forget that. I'm a real ass American.
- [110:29]
B
Dustin sent $25. Glad you're back. Hope you and Keith had a good time out there. Call me emoji.
- [110:33]
A
We did. We had a great time.
- [110:34]
B
The white rican sent $50. Remember when dance monkey was the worst thing going on?
- [110:38]
A
I don't. Can't say that I don't.
- [110:39]
B
Googly woogly sent $20. Welcome back king. Quick non consequential question. How are Republicans even supposed to win in 28 with Trump?
- [110:46]
A
I don't even know what, what does that even mean? What do you mean how are they going to win with Trump? What are you even talking about?
- [110:53]
B
Red pill Dreamy sent $20. Hi Nick. How do you eat your fun dip? Do you use the sticks to eat the powder or eat each separately? Nick J. FedPlan sent $22. Do you think Tucker Carlson talked to you about porn because he's seen the NSA Tapes of you being her meat based.
- [111:04]
A
Honestly, I kind of thought. I'm not gonna lie, I kind of thought that. Not that I've ever done that, right? But like. No, but I honestly thought that. Because he told me, he's like. He's like, porn is like an Israeli op and you know, they're. They're filming you when you're watching porn. And then I was, honest to God, I was kind of thinking like that, like during the show. That was gonna be the big reveal. I was gonna be like. Cause I talked to pornhub and we have the tapes. I was gonna be like, here we go. That's funny that you say, but I'm a conspiratorial paranoid thinker. So I was thinking like, oh, palmetto grower.
- [111:41]
B
Percent 25. What is your opinion on grow wipers entering the field of counterintelligence?
- [111:46]
A
Is that a field? You mean like, what, with the CIA? Yeah, sure.
- [111:49]
B
Lady Liberty sent $50. I trust you, Nick. Glad you and Sneako are good. Real friends are rare. Totally opposite from my best friend, but going on 10 plus years now. Also impressed by your driving in Rome. Italians drive crazy.
- [111:59]
A
Thanks, man. Yeah, yeah, this. They are. Real friends are rare, but I've got a lot of them. You know, I was having a tough time the past couple weeks, and it was very heartening how many people I can count on and people that were there for me. So I appreciated that. They kind of brought me back to life a little bit. So it's true. My dream. Am I not a great driver? Yeah, Rome is crazy. It's crazy. The Vespas are flying everywhere. And what can I say? I'm an excellent driver. I'm an excellent driver. So, yeah, it's true.
- [112:35]
B
Indiana grow I percent $20. I'm glad you're back with another great show. Don't know how much longer I could listen to Dave Smith talk about Mesa chips.
- [112:41]
A
Does he do Mesa chip ads? I haven't seen that.
- [112:44]
B
Jesus. What? Jesus. Who said $100? Are you ready for Jewish American heritage month in a few days?
- [112:50]
A
Who cares, bro? Thank you for the big super chat. What is wrong? Are you just like some chud? Are you Oy vey? You ready for Jewish heritage month? What are you like, who cares, dude? Who even knows that? How did you even know that? What, you mean the month of May? Yeah, I'm looking forward to the month of May. I had no idea it was Jewish heritage month. Chuds are like, oy vey. Are you ready for Jewish American heritage? Yeah, dude, whatever. Like who cares? Like can you just move on?
- [113:20]
B
High Speed Sneeze sent $20 hi Nick, what are your thoughts on future congressman Brandon Herrera? He also is on the unsubscribe podcast. Thank you.
- [113:25]
A
I still don't know Anything about Peru
- [113:27]
B
711 Sent $20 Nick, what's your opinion regarding the current crisis in Peru? Electoral fraud, US base in Kaoyao and military jet purchases.
- [113:33]
A
Haven't been following it.
- [113:33]
B
Logging sent $20 I'm 5ft 4 inches. Pathetic. And getting leg lengthening surgery to become 5ft 9 inches. Thoughts?
- [113:39]
A
Honestly, it's worth it. Honestly I think you should do it. Go for it. 59 isn't great either but 54 is
- [113:46]
B
devastating $4,225 improbably dumb but I have this idea that Diawan KMT party and Israel are deeply tied. Im guessing this is why we need to have China mainland under thumb. I think Iran China 101pi I don't
- [113:58]
A
really know enough about that. I don't know about the connections between Israel and KMT but maybe I haven't
- [114:04]
B
looked into make sneaker a Passon sent $50 they offered you 6 mil for Charlottesville but you took 270k on principle respect.
- [114:09]
A
Very good. Yeah I've seen that tweet before. Yeah love it, love it Love it.
- [114:14]
B
Benjamin Frankly 88 cent 20 the same people who call it white nationalism tell little white children that they shouldn't have kids because it's bad to not have a fully brown country.
- [114:21]
A
Whoa. Yeah, that's like a double standard or something. That's hypocritical. Someone should tell them that, you know, if the shoe were on the other foot. The same people calling you white nationalism telling little white kid yeah, they're kind of like hypocrites or something. We should do something.
- [114:36]
B
Danielle Carrey 3 sent $20 Whoa dude. Never realized that guy who came to your house had just killed multiple other people. That's actually insane.
- [114:42]
A
Yeah.
- [114:42]
B
So glad you're okay news boy.
- [114:43]
A
He killed other people. Him and his best friend had like a falling out. The best friend like kicked the shit out of him in his dorm and then he just went on this downward spiral. So then he drove to his best friend's house, killed the guy, his sister, his mom. Then he got back in the car, drove to my house and tried to kill me. Now he's dead and I'm alive.
- [115:05]
B
Christopher Rose $0.01 20 how do you up hamburger, fries and a Coke. Doesn't get more simple than that.
- [115:10]
A
Well, you know, he probably heard hamburger and heard Burger. I said hamburger. He probably heard burger and was like, I don't know. Just. Well, I almost sneezed there. He probably just said, you know, give me a burger, give me a McCrispy. But whatever it happened, it's over. We're going to move on.
- [115:28]
B
Last night you came across as not liking. Hey, dudes. So I wanted to ask, what's your opinion on sup, niggas?
- [115:36]
A
What's your opinion on sup? That. That's funny. Okay. That's hilarious. That's a good super.
- [115:42]
B
Potato Pete sent $50.
- [115:44]
A
What's your opinion on sup, sir?
- [115:46]
B
Potato Pete sent 50. I love what you said last night about not having a lot of time. I had learned the hard way. Turn 30. I didn't follow my dreams, but I'm still hopeful for the future. Getting after it now.
- [115:56]
A
Oh, my gosh. That's really funny. Yeah, yeah, it's true. It's true. Things change in a short time. We do not have a long time here. So, yeah, good luck to you. 30 is still kind of young, but you're also cooked. If you're 30, you're kind of cooked. Like you're not going to pivot. I saw some piece today, it said there's no you cannot pivot in life. Whatever you've been doing is what you're going to be doing forever with very few exceptions. So you might be cooked, but, you know, that's okay because nothing really matters all that much. Everybody's miserable and we're all going to die. So, you know, like, who even really cares? Just eat your fucking goy.
- [116:35]
B
Slots88cent20 listing my gently pre owned grower pets T shirt on eBay for $3,500. Yeah, maybe it'll get at a 947-281-638. $20 daily reminder that atheists orthis and prots will all burn in hell. Sorry folks, I don't make the rules. God does.
- [116:48]
A
W's in the chat. Hell yeah.
- [116:50]
B
Chevrolet Groiper said $20. Love you, man. Do you have a favorite power tool brand? V1889 sent $20. Have you seen the 12 hours Swedish documentary about world jewelry Europa, the last battle. Bob Team 7 sent $100 gm.
- [117:03]
A
Thank you for the big super chat. I appreciate it. Good morning, Vincent.
- [117:06]
B
Boogaloo sent $29 to 5 UNC up here in Janesville. I realize this isn't much, but thank you for speaking the truth and fighting for what remains of our great republic. You are appreciated.
- [117:15]
A
Of our great republic. Sad to do that. Sorry. Thanks. Thank you. Janesville. I've been to Janesville when I campaigned for Paul Nealon many years ago. Many, many, many years ago. Oh, yes, when I was a younger man. Those were the days, huh? For fighting for what remains of our great republic. W. Yes, yes, the great report.
- [117:41]
B
Lincoln consent. $20 what's your stance on stoicism? I've seen conflicting opinions, but the more I look into it, the more appealing it seems.
- [117:46]
A
I think it's like Reddit. If you're like into stoicism, you're a redditor. Like, you're probably reading a Naseem Taleb books you're reading. Who's that other. Who's that other knucklehead that writes those types of books? You know I'm talking about. Oh, what's his name? Malcolm Gladwell. Yeah, if you're. If you're talking about. Still, I'm getting really into stoicism. I picked up Meditations by Marcus Aurelius. It's like, yeah, you and every chud. You and every guy with one of those vests. You and every guy that watches the all in podcast. I'm getting really into stoicism. Shouldn't be into that.
- [118:25]
B
$50 take two weeks off frequently if you kick ass like this when refreshed. Yeah, maybe Patty 700 cent $20 vote for Casey Butch by May 5 R4P Ramaswamy putsch has a legitimate chance to be Vivek and has stated he will fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered our former lives. USA emoji af he really does not
- [118:43]
A
have a legitimate chance at all. And. And that's okay. I'm just going to go with the Democrats.
- [118:49]
B
720. Vivek has also spent over a million in the past few months to hide Casey's real polling numbers.
- [118:53]
A
Oh, just stop. Come on now. What are you even talking about? Oh man, it's like I need to be insulated from my own audience. I can't do that anymore. They're paying millions of dollars to suppress the real polling.
- [119:07]
B
Shut The Billy Stir sent $50. After socializing with some grow ipers recently, I was inspired by many to improve my life. Shout out to MN Dominic, CBG Ox
- [119:15]
A
Hoplite and Greg Wang Ho7 so wholesome and sweet.
- [119:18]
B
Stock of 1252 cent $20. Graduated top five in my HS class now at Purdue University. You were right when you said biggest red pill is most people are effing retarded. Lot of ppl here can study but are not intelligent. GROWIPER AF Wow, that's really that Nicker sent $20. Freaking good king. You are mogging. Everyone watching your old debates is peak content. Will we get Nick the knife in the big 26?
- [119:37]
A
Maybe. I don't know.
- [119:37]
B
Basement dweller sent $20. Securing a future for white children is the message that we need to stick to. Let the others chase self destructive lifestyles if they desire that. Clav is a horrible role model. He is lost.
- [119:48]
A
Sunyun dude. Securing a future for white children is a message we need to stick on. Oh goodness gracious dude. It's over. It's over. We are cooked and it's over. And politics is jester and it's over. Securing a future for white children. Clav is a horrible role model. He is lost. Yeah, he's a little lost with the drug use and some of those other things, but yeah, I don't know, you just sound like. Like a dork.
- [120:25]
B
UpGrad sent $200. Hey Nick, glad you feel better and took some time off. Let's flip the house in 26 and get ready for 28. Love the blue quarters. If it's my go to distressed hat ordered. See you in the club chat. God bless.
- [120:35]
A
Yeah. Hey, thank you for the big super chat. I appreciate it. Yes, yes, let's do those things. And I'm glad you like the quarter zip. Absolutely. Thank you very much. I appreciate it.
- [120:47]
B
Calling the Jewish family Parasites was an epic based smiley face emoji victory hand emoji.
- [120:51]
A
Ah, it wasn't a Jewish family, was it?
- [120:54]
B
Hussein Wabi Hill sent $20. I'm considering taking my girl to the Pink Pony club, but they asked for id. Do you know how I can overcome this for my cunny bunny. Sincerely, Ezriel Montoy. Jimbo Zoomer sent $20. Should have moved your Amerindian Olmec's glass for the native Italian who wanted to park and go to the Colosseum. Stalking the Italian countryside to miscegenate with the white Italian. You'd disgust me.
- [121:10]
A
I saw that. That was funny.
- [121:11]
B
Eight for Snipper Kitty. 43 cent $20. You're a good driver until it comes to the Cains Drive trough throwback.
- [121:16]
A
Yeah, very funny. Hilarious.
- [121:17]
B
James Bond 4200. Sent $20. Thoughts on the illegal Muslim Islams raping kids in Europe.
- [121:22]
A
Uh, it's bad. Great question. Okay, that. Yeah. Thoughts on kids getting raped. That's bad. Okay, that's our last super chat. Thankfully that's gonna do it for me. Remember to smash the follow button on Rumble. Smash the like button. Leave a comment I'm on the air Monday through Friday. As always, thanks for watching. Thanks. Thank you to our top super chatter. Special thanks to upgrade fractured light silencer AF6 or 7 million sockless Jesus. What? And Bob team. Thanks to them. Thanks to all our super chatters. Everybody that watches, we love you. I'll see you tomorrow. Until then, have a great rest of your evening. Americanism, not globalism will be our credo. It's going to be only America first? America first? The American people will come first Once again. With respect the respect that we take deserve. From this day forward it's going to be only America first? America first.