Sammy (UAP Gerb) (6:53)
Below that there seems to be UFO legacy program administrators. These administrators are likely seem to stem from the big six intelligence agencies, not big five. The National Security Agency, nsa, dia, CIA, NRO and nga. There's not five, there's six. There's the Neuro, the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office, which was established in 1969 and still has not been disclosed to this day. So directorates within those intelligence agencies. For example, the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology seems to be a legacy program administrator. And then conversely on the same side, other side of that coin, DOD agencies. You know, this could be the Edwards 412 test wing. This could be Army Test and Evaluation Command. This could be the Office of Naval Intelligence, the Office of Naval Research. And so those seem to be the UFO legacy program administrators. Now in Most of discussion about legacy programs and this is kind of perpetuated in most mainstream discussion of the topic. It's okay, the United States government, DoD and intelligence community and then contractors, you know, the Lockheed Martin, the Northrop Grummans, the Battelle Memorial Institutes. I think that's incorrect and I think that's very incorrect. I think there's an intermediary step between that and this is below the legacy program admins and above the defense industrial based contractors, the prime contractors. And that is people, people who watch my channel will probably laugh at me saying this because I talk about it non stop at ffrdc Federally Funded Research and Development Centers. These are government owned contractor operated institutions that are subject matter experts for all sorts of of programs that the United States government, DoD and IC can't handle themselves. So FFRDC's examples here would be the Mitre Corporation, numerous institutions run by Battelle Memorial Institute, Sandia Lawrence Livermore, Oak Ridge Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, National Labs. The reason why FFRDCs I think are higher on the totem pole of so to speak than, than contractors is because FFRDCs are inherently government owned contractor operated. So these institutions can serve as subject matter experts for exotic technology programs. But elements of the Department of Defense or intelligence community can still maintain access control over materials, information, personnel, etceter. So the FFRDC can serve as an R and D expert and subject matter expert and be a program admin for the defense industrial based contractors. So that's how the USG United States government and its elements of legacy programs can still retain control over these programs. You know, people talk about oh, the programs have run away in Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. I don't think that's correct. People will say that these programs have no oversight. No, I think there's a very structured oversight to these programs. It's just not traditional oversight channels. And then at the bottom of this Pyram pyramid is the defense industrial based prime contractors, the Lockheed Martins, the Northrop Grummans and what Northrop, adep, bdm, trw, Teledyne, Ryan Raytheon, Raytheon, especially with the US army and so forth. The mortar that holds this pyramid together would be the Defense industrial base and funding mechanisms. This would be stuff like major range and test facility bases or MRTFBs which are basically large DoD ranges across the continental United States. I believe they're. There are 26 such agencies. They are spread across the US Army, US Navy, US Air Force and Defense Defense Agency. Examples here include the Nevada Test and training range, you know, that houses area 51, that houses allegedly S4, that houses the Tonopah test range, all sorts of weird little Sandia run sites, the numbered areas, this includes the Utah Test and Training Range, the West Desert Test Center, Both of those are situated on Dugway proving grounds. Edwards 412 test wing out of Edwards Air Force Base, China Lake, Patuxent river and so forth. And funding mechanisms. I think the best way to look at this is what David Grush has spoken about. And this would essentially be misappropriation of funds, right? IRAD Independent Research and Development, which is a very creative system that defense industrial based contractors can take upon projects that they consider to be in the interest of national security and build the DoD for it. This includes carryover funds which basically budget left over at the end of a fiscal year that's not reported, that's then utilized by the agency. And we can talk about this more. But in 1994, 1995, the National Reconnaissance Office, the NRO, which runs America's spy satellites, IMMENT and SIGINT primarily that David Grush worked for as well as the nga, got in busted in huge trouble. They underwent a Senate and GAO audit for enormous misappropriation funds, specifically carryover funds back in 1994, 1995 in the realm of $.2 billion or so. And remember the NRO was only declassified in 1992. This could also be overcharging of parts. There's a really interesting example of this back in the 80s and 90s of the Navy. It'd be things like, it'd be things like ashtrays on, on military planes that were overcharged by thousands of dollars. Profit margins of like 60 to 80% on, on submarines, socket wrenches for, for fighter jets priced like 15,000% over what they should be worth and so forth. And then finally, you know, if we're, if we're thinking about this pyramid as like the old Egyptian pyramids, the, the pyramids were once encased in limestone, right? To protect the pyramids from the elements and so forth. Well that limestone casing for this UFO legacy program pyramid, this would be program Protection Strategies. This would be the DARPA Defense Advanced Research Project Agency Security and Intelligence Directorate SID which is responsible for program protection for some of the United States most classified special access programs. DARPA said this is the boogeyman. This would also be Department of Energy Intelligence, Department of Energy, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, oici. And yes, the DOE has its own intelligence agency. This would be black budget program Structure like saps, Special Access Programs, usaps Unacknowledged Special Access Programs or in the intelligence community CAPS Controlled Access Program. Carve out contracts with defense industrial prime contractors. Further examples of program protection strategy would be complex psyops disinformation, disinformation campaigns, National Security Council programs, Sean Kirkpatrick, Arrow Rick Doty, stuff like that. So, and like I said, I think that took like 10 minutes. But in a super broad term that is how I view the structure of legacy programs. A very complex pyramid. And again it's probably far more complex than, than we can even begin to, to understand. But that is how I look and start to break down the structure of the programs.