
And the president blames Democrat Ihan Omar after she was attacked
Loading summary
Anthony
This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the uk.
Sarah
There's a fire inside you you can't ignore.
Anthony
Stand still.
Sarah
Not a chance.
Anthony
You're a lifelong learner who's come this far.
Sarah
Now we are here to help you keep going further. Capella University. What can't you do?
Anthony
Visit Capella.
Sarah
Edu to learn more.
Anthony
Owning a home is full of surprises. Some wonderful, some not so much. And when something breaks, it can feel like the whole day unravels. That's why HomeServe exists. For as little as $4.99 a month. You'll always have someone to call, a trusted professional ready to help, bringing peace of mind to four and a half million homeowners nationwide. For plans starting at just $4.99 a month, go to HomeServe.com that's HomeServe.com not available everywhere. Most plans range between $4.99 to $11.99 a month. Your first year terms apply on covered repairs.
Sarah
President Trump is saying he wants to de escalate tensions in Minnesota after the killing of the US Citizen Alex Pretty by federal immigration agents at the weekend. And Donald Trump has sent the very controversial Border Patrol chief out of the state. But there are still thousands of ICE Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minnesota. The protests are carrying on, so how much of a de escalation can we really expect? And if we do, what does that mean for Donald Trump's deportation policy? Welcome to AmericasT. AmericasT, AmericasT from BBC News.
Anthony
When Donald Trump calls, they say, yes, sir, right away, sir. Happy to lick your boot, sir. We are the sickest country in the world. Oh, dear. Are you worried that billionaires are going to go hungry? Of course the president supports peaceful protests.
Marianna
What a stupid question.
Anthony
Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?
Sarah
Hello, it's Sarah here in the BBC's Washington bureau.
Marianna
And it is Marianna in the worldwide headquarters of AmericasT in London.
Anthony
And it's Anthony. Still up to my neck in snow here in my home in Arlington, Virginia.
Marianna
Right. So a lot has happened since we last talked about Minneapolis. On Monday's podcast, when we were answering your various questions about it, we've had this preliminary report, haven't we, into what happened. And the president has been talking about Alex Pretty's killing. Sarah, if you were gonna sort of get us up to speed with where we're at now, what would be your sort of summary of it?
Sarah
Well, so just to briefly run through what happened for anybody who's not caught up. Alex Pretty was a US Citizen, a nurse in the local Veterans Hospital was shot dead by federal immigration agents on Saturday. And there was video evidence. Quite a lot of videos appeared on social media directly contradicting what the Trump administration had said. Immediately afterwards. They claimed that he was a domestic terrorist, that he was intent on causing a mass massacre of law enforcement agents. And there was no evidence for any of those claims in videos that everybody could look at. And we talked about this on Monday's episode. Since then, we've had this initial report from Homeland Security, and it confirms that two officers did fire guns in the shooting of Alex Pretty. And crucially, it makes absolutely no mention of him having brandished a gun, which is what the Homeland Security Secretary, Christy Noem, told the media or in making any kind of threats towards these officers. Now, Donald Trump has been to Iowa on Tuesday to make a speech about the economy. But of course, on the way, he took lots of questions from the media with different reporters and an interview that he gave to Fox News as well.
Anthony
We're gonna de escalate a little bit. The message is out that Tom Homan is in. Yeah. Commander Bovino is supposedly leaving Minneapolis along with some CBP agencies.
Marianna
Is this a pullback?
Anthony
I don't think it's a pullback. It's a little bit of a change. Everybody in this room that has a business, you know, you make little changes. You know, Bavino is very good, but he's a pretty out there kind of a guy. And in some cases that's good. Maybe it wasn't good here.
Sarah
Do you agree with me?
Marianna
Do you agree with the assessment from.
Anthony
Some of your own officials that Alex.
Marianna
Freddy is a domestic terrorist or an assassin?
Anthony
Well, I haven't heard that, but certainly he shouldn't have been carrying a gun. But all of, hey, look, bottom line, everybody in this room, we view that as a very unfortunate incident. Everyone, unless you're. You're a stupid person. Very, very unfortunate incident. I don't like that he had a gun. I don't like that he had two fully loaded magazines. That's a lot of bad stuff. And despite that, I say that's a very unfortunate. So there. Donald Trump is once again pointing out the fact that Alex Preddy had a loaded handgun, had several clips on him, and suggesting that that was part of the reason why this situation escalated and implying that he was somehow responsible. I think that is going to annoy a lot of gun conservative gun rights groups in the US You've already heard some pushback from the National Rifle association and from a Minnesota gun rights group to previous comments by Trump Administration officials on this. It is not the kind of line you would expect to hear from Donald Trump, who is touted about him being the biggest defender of the Second Amendment, which protects the constitutional right to have firearms in this country.
Sarah
Yeah. So Anthony, what Donald Trump said there was that he didn't like that he had a gun or that he had two fully loaded magazines. We've heard other administration officials talking about this, notably Kash Patel, head of the FBI, normally a big supporter of the Second Amendment as well. And he said you can't bring a gun to a protest. Now that's not right, is it? Well, I mean, one, this wasn't really a protest as such, but setting that aside, you can bring a gun to a protest, can you? In fact, as many guns as you like, as long as you're licensed to carry them.
Anthony
There's no carve out in the Second Amendment that says you have a right to bear arms except when you're going to protest. Now, does that risk escalating the situation if you have a firearm and you're around law enforcement who are worried about their safety? Yes. But also, as many on the left have pointed out, Donald Trump supporters have shown up at rallies and protests carrying not just handguns, but loaded semiautomatic rifles as well, armed to the teeth. And they are, they say, exercising their constitutional rights. And of course, you haven't seen this kind of a violent incident when these right wing gun rights activists have been showing up to protest. So yeah, yeah, I think there's clear contradictions here. And Donald Trump is kind of treading on dangerous ground with his own base if he keeps pushing ahead on this.
Sarah
So why do you think they're just looking for any excuse to blame Alex Pretty for something here?
Anthony
I think that's certainly part of it. Maybe they're making a pitch to what they would consider more centrist people who aren't gun rights activists or gun rights proponents who would look at this and say, well, geez, why does he have a gun in this sort of a circumstance? But when you get right down to it, he had that right. And it shouldn't have been grounds for the kind of response that the law enforcement had there. Although you can understand, again, they see a gun, they're on edge already. All of the immigration enforcement officials in this incident were armed as well. They very quickly pulled out their handguns when they heard that. And then someone shouted, gun, gun, gun. And things escalated from there.
Marianna
One thing that just on that point, you were making Anthony around the risk of losing some of his base here. I mean, if you look at the, some of the very pro maga, pro Donald Trump accounts on social media and, but particularly those that frequently post about gun rights and the right to carry arms and everything else, quite a few of them have turned on Donald Trump over this. And they have been posting saying that, you know, all administrations should be, should be held accountable for this kind of thing and it's not a reason to shoot someone and all that, all that kind of stuff.
Anthony
Remember all the defenses that people asserted on the right for Kyle Rittenhouse, who was the individual during the Black Lives Matter protests in Wisconsin, who had a semiautomatic rifle, carrying it during those protests, shot someone and was not charged by any of the law enforcement there. I mean, he was celebrated as a hero by many conservatives, including Donald Trump himself. So it's a very different sort of one treatment of him in that sort of circumstance and reaction by law enforcement during those protests, which were much more, much more tinged with the potential for violence than what we've seen from this video of Alex Priddy prior to his shooting.
Sarah
Now, the other thing Donald Trump mentioned there, well, the other person Donald Trump mentioned there was Gregory Bovino, the Border Force chief, very high profile in recent months in various different cities as ICE have gone in on these immigration raids. And he's been asked to leave Minnesota. Now he's being sent back to California, where he's from. Is that going to make a major difference, I guess, to what happens on the ground and to the perception of what's happening on the ground? Because, I mean, he has been seen as the kind of the face of the particularly aggressive, sometimes violent push into these cities, hasn't he? Because although there's been these, there's been lots and lots of occasions where protesters have been wrestled to the ground, pepper sprayed and you're treated quite violently in many, many ways. And the violent way in which they go into people's homes when they're looking for what they think are illegal immigrants. So, Anthony, do you think, I mean, a major change in tactics, do you think, or is Bovino the fall guy here and once he's left Minnesota, then people can look elsewhere?
Anthony
I don't think we've seen a change in tactics necessarily yet. On Sunday and Monday, we saw video evidence of continued immigration enforcement in Minneapolis, continued clashes between immigration, federal immigration officers and protesters. So that hasn't changed, although there has been talk of at least some of the immigration officers being removed from Minneapolis. So maybe not quite as many, but the drawdown, the de escalation as Donald Trump mentioned, hasn't really been felt on the ground yet by many. But I do think that, as you mentioned, Bovina was the face of this aggressive immigration effort, and not just in Minneapolis, but in Chicago and in Charlotte, North Carolina, and in Portland and in Los Angeles, all of these. He was kind of the man who was out front in his full military style Border Patrol uniform, giving press briefings where he's been denouncing not just the protesters, but also talking about the type of criminals they've been taking off the streets. I remember a video of him holding what looked like some sort of a gas canister, tear gas or smoke, and tossing it at protesters surrounded by his Border Patrol fellow Border Patrol officers. So he had become a bit of a lightning rod here. So taking him out of the equation at least gives the administration a chance to say, okay, we're putting someone else in here, Tom Homan, a little more skilled politically, a little less bombastic, a little more of a Washington player because he worked in the Obama administration as well as the Trump administrations. So it's a change of tone, perhaps a change of attitude. We'll see if it's an actual change of policy as well.
Sarah
And Gregory Bevino that we were just talking about, who was in charge of the operations there in Minneapolis, it's not just that post that he's lost. He lost access to his social media accounts. He couldn't be posting on X anymore. And that's, I thought, absolutely fascinating that the White House clearly thought it was as important to stop him communicating on social media as it was to stop him from actually taking charge of the operation on the ground.
Marianna
Yeah, and it's really interesting because lots of the posts he's shared have highlighted individual examples of where he feels, you know, the crackdown on immigration is working. For example, his latest post, before he then kind of went quiet, went dormant, was saying, convicted sexual predator arrested. You know, he's bigging up what would would be perceived as the kind of achievements, if that's the right word, of the administration meeting their targets and goals. I think that the decision to essentially not allow him to use his X profile highlights two really important things. The first is that the individual examples that are being accentuated or picked up upon by politicians are not necessarily proving that helpful for Donald Trump in terms of the public perception of the, these immigration crackdowns. And number two, that they recognize the power that even X, which we often talk about, how it's small but mighty in terms of its ability to shape political narratives. They recognize that actually it's a really crucial and important tool and it's a.
Sarah
Big thing that the White House hammer all the time, the number of violent criminals they say have been detained and in many cases deported. And in fact, the last time we saw Donald Trump in the briefing room just over a week ago, he was there with all of these A4 sized photographs, sort of mugshots of people who he said had already been deported outside of America, with a list of the crimes that they'd committed. Now dangerous they were, and what a safer place America was for not having them in the country anymore. But actually, Anthony, I just saw some stats from the Cato Institute who say of all of the people who've been detained in this crackdown since Trump came back to the White House, only 27% of them have any convictions at all, and only 5% of them have convictions for violent crime. If you listen to Donald Trump or Caroline Levitt or anybody in the administration, you'd think that they were nearly all violent criminals. I wonder to what extent it's making it through into the public's mind that actually a lot of these are perfectly law abiding citizens who might not be entirely innocent in that they're living in the country illegally or in an undocumented fashion, but haven't been committing the kind of crimes the administration would want you to believe they had.
Anthony
Right. The White House has been characterized, the people being detained and removed as the worst of the worst. The pictures that we see out of Minneapolis and elsewhere, you see the five year old child who we talked about on this podcast before, who has been detained with his father and sent to Texas pending removal. You see families, you see people who are working in schools or people who are working in restaurants. These are not hardened criminals. These are just people, as you mentioned, who are living in the United States without documentation. And that I think kind of drives home the fundamental reality of this is that for the past year plus, Trump and his White House staff have been talking about the need for mass deportations. Stephen Miller, Donald Trump's White House Deputy Chief of staff, set a goal of 3,000 detainees a day. There just aren't the kind of numbers there to focus solely on criminals or people who have broken the law. And, and so that is why I think you see some people looking at these things and seeing a disconnect between what the White House is saying and what they're seeing with their own eyes. And they're seeing in videos and they're seeing portrayed in the media and online.
Marianna
Kind of on that point, actually, we've had this from americaster, James. It's not his real name, but he's worried about the repercussions from ice.
Anthony
Hello, americast, this is James in Minneapolis. I'm a teacher, and my colleagues and I are giving lifts or rides, as we say here, to many of our Hispanic and East African students, because their parents are legitimately scared to leave their houses. I'm not a U.S. citizen. The family I drive with are U.S. citizens. But they know that their children will be safer being driven by a white person. Now, people here talk about MAGA being a dog whistle for Make America white again. So I was wondering, do you think this is an accurate assessment of the administration's aims? I think that certainly is a criticism of the Trump's MAGA movement, that it is focused on kind of an ethno nationalism, that the crackdown on undocumented migrants focuses predominantly on undocumented migrants from places like Latin America and Africa and not on places that are European. And if you look at stated immigration policy, the refugee policy, as has been revised by the Trump administration, they have been putting a focus on accepting refugees, asylum seekers from South Africa, white asylum seekers from South Africa, not the type of asylum seekers we've seen, say, under the Biden administration, that were from places like Central America and Haiti and Africa. So it is certainly possible to draw the conclusion from that evidence that this administration is focused on prioritizing white migrants versus migrants of color. And if you listen to people like Stephen Miller, who I've just talked about, he has given speeches talking about the United States or positioning the United States as a defender of Western civilization, of Western culture, which you can certainly listen to and think, okay, here again is kind of the dog whistle, the touchstone for a policy that is focused on white European values versus the values of other countries and other ethnic identities.
Sarah
And Donald Trump gets asked about this every so often, whether it is his desire to make the country whiter, and he says, absolutely not. It just so happens that all the people who are here illegally are very often people of color and that those who are here perfectly legally American citizens, people who were born in the United States, is very happy for them to stay and appreciates the melting pot nature of American cities, society. Now, not everybody necessarily believes them about that. And Anthony, you're absolutely right. You can look at some of the policies which seem to be straining in a different direction, but from his own lips. Donald Trump always vehemently denies that as an idea.
Anthony
All right, Sarah, let's get back to the Politics of this Bovino is out. But some of the other people behind this policy, the faces of the administration on this crackdown, Kristi Noem, the Homeland Security secretary in particular, they're still in their jobs. And Donald Trump, at least for the moment, has said he has no intention of removing her, even though she was one of the people out there from the very beginning, suggesting that Pretty somehow had instigated his own death. So do we think that Noem is on shaky ground? Have you been getting any signs that maybe there is increased criticism of her that may end up costing her her job?
Sarah
I don't think it'll cost her a job, but I think you might find she's still sidelined a bit for a while. So she and her number two, Corey Lewandowski, another very controversial member of the Trump administration, were in the Oval Office for two hours on Monday night talking to the president. And one has to assume that they weren't being congratulated on how things were going in Minneapolis. That was probably a very uncomfortable meeting. Now, we know Donald Trump doesn't like firing people. He doesn't want to be seen to be being pushed around by the media or public opinion, and he thinks it would look like he was admitting he'd made a mistake if he actually fires somebody. So I think she's extremely unlikely to lose her job, certainly in the short term.
Marianna
What's been really interesting, over the past week, quite a lot of people have been pointing out that they've been seeing content from Donald Trump's administration on social media or from politicians who support Donald Trump. But they feel as though some of the content relating to, for example, the shootings in, in Minneapolis they've actually not been seeing on their feeds, and it's led to accusations of censorship, particularly when it comes to TikTok. And it's worth saying that TikTok has just kind switched over from being owned by, kind of exclusively by ByteDance, which is the Chinese company that owns TikTok, more generally, to this US consortium, which includes Oracle and which Larry Ellison is in charge of, and various other big companies, several of which are run by people who've been supportive of Donald Trump. And all of that has kind of cooked up this speculation, which at points has tipped into conspiracy of people saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, they're deliberately now suppressing on TikTok videos about, for example, ICE agents, because they don't want us to see it, because they don't want us to be critical of the administration. Now, Tick Tock has come out very clearly to say look, most of the stuff that people have been highlighting or the stuff people have been highlighting is connected to glitches where we've moved over sort of where US Users data is being stored, which is why this consortium had to buy it in the first place, because of these various accusations about China. But anyway, all of that is a kind of way of saying that increasingly, I think the administration or Donald Trump at least, and we know this kind of from the fact that various politicians seem to be being sort of warned against posting this stuff online, that they're realizing how powerful these individual cases are. But that doesn't make the conspiracy true, but it's something that people are noticing. They're saying, oh, hold on a second, I, I want to see the stuff that's showing me what's really going on here. And this feeling that actually the genuine approach which Donald Trump's administration have taken, quite a few people are saying this doesn't feel very genuine anymore.
Anthony
I think to get back to the point about Kristi Noem, because I think there is some risk to her at this point, There have been a couple of Republican senators, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have come out and said that she should resign. Now, they have been Trump critics in the past, so it's not a major break, but it is an indication that there are some even within the Republican Party who are nervous about her. And then the Democrats feel like they have an advantage here. The House Democrats came out, the leadership came out with a letter saying that they were going to make a motion to impeach Christine Noem, that she should resign. Otherwise they're going to keep pushing ahead, and they can do this the hard way or the easy way. Now, it's unlikely that she could actually be impeached because Republicans control the House and Republicans control the Senate. But it is a chance to put a lot of Republicans down on record defending Noem at a time when I think Democrats feel she is not very popular.
Sarah
Yeah, it's quite smart, I think, because instead of arguing about their own immigration policy, which Democrats often find quite uncomfortable, they can try and pin it all on Kristi Noem. As you say, they don't have a chance of impeaching her, but they can make every Republican congressperson who is standing for reelection in November actually vote in favor of her and then use that in campaigns against them. If she is still a kind of poster girl for the tactics that were being used in Minneapolis and that people still are extremely uncomfortable about that, then what? And she is so prominent, you see so much of her. What a great way of trying to tie other Republicans to this unpopular immigration crackdown if that is still an issue in November. Yeah.
Anthony
And there are Republicans who are starting to express concern and not just kind of the usual suspects in the Senate, but rock ribbed Republicans in red states like Texas, where you saw the governor of Texas, Greg Abbott. Greg Abbott says the White House needs to recalibrate on what needs to be done to make sure that receipts respect for federal law enforcement officers is going to be reinstilled. And that's not an easy task. And then we heard from Kevin Stitt, who's the Republican governor of Oklahoma, questioning a little more the wider end game in this immigration enforcement policy. Here he is talking to cnn. But now Americans are asking themselves, what is the end game? What is the solution? And you know, we believe in federalism and state rights and nobody likes feds coming into their state. And so what's the goal right now? Is it to deport every single non US Citizen? I don't think that's what Americans want.
Sarah
Yeah, that's interesting, isn't it? So not only have we got some normally loyal Republicans expressing some deep concern there about two very interesting topics, I think so you've got Greg Abbott in Texas talking about the way in which this is undermining respect for law enforcement for the Department of Homeland Security. I've read a lot of comments serving agents as well, saying they're really, really worried about the reputation of their agencies being destroyed by what people are seeing happening in Minneapolis. And then you've got Kevin Stitt there talking about states rights. I mean, something else. Conservatives are usually very, very strong on saying the federal government can't come into my state and start pushing people around and doing what they want and criticizing the policy. From that point of view, it's as though the Trump administration has just got itself on the the wrong side of a lot of very traditional conservative arguments, isn't it, Anthony?
Anthony
Yeah. Tucker Carlson, another outspoken conservative, sometimes a critic of Trump's, but also leading voice in the MAGA movement, says it's clear that what's occurring in Minneapolis is completely out of control. Leaders in Washington must do everything possible to lower the temperature. Carlson is the guy who has raised the temperature at points. So if he's saying things are getting out of control, I think maybe that is one of the reasons why you've seen Trump start to back down a bit in the face of this criticism.
Sarah
Yeah. And then even the Republican candidate for governor in Minnesota itself Chris Medell suspended his campaign and he said he was worried that people were being targeted for their skin color.
Anthony
I have read about and I have spoken to countless United States citizens who have been detained in Minnesota due to the color of their skin. I personally have spoken to several law enforcement officers, some Hispanic and some Asian, who have been pulled over by ICE on pretextual stops. Driving while Hispanic is not a crime. Either is driving while Asian. At the end of the day, I have to look my daughters in the eye and tell them I believe I.
Sarah
Did what was right.
Anthony
And I am doing that today.
Sarah
That was a video statement that he put out on Monday saying he was suspending his campaign to run for the Republican candidacy for governor of Minnesota. And that was quite a surprise because he had just a couple of weeks before been providing legal support to the ICE officer who shot Renee Goode. So this is somebody who had been really, you know, perfectly happy with the way that this immigration crackdown had been being conducted in his state. That was a very strong statement, I thought.
Anthony
I think all of this kind of underscores the concern among Republicans that immigration was a big issue for them. It is a big issue for them. It delivered the White House to Donald Trump in 2024. It's a place where they have in recent years had a lot of strength compared to Democrats. And all of a sudden now, if you look at public opinion polls, approval of Donald Trump's handling of immigration policy has tanked majority saying it's going too far, that they are being too aggressive, and that they don't want this kind of militaristic enforcement that they are seeing in American cities. So all of a sudden, looking at the midterm elections in November, one of the big issues that Republicans might have been able to run on could become a liability. And I think that's why you see such a quick move from some Republicans to try to change course here and reel this administration back in a bit.
Marianna
And all of this does put the spotlight on the impact that rhetoric against certain groups of people, whether it's politicians or the average person or people from particular places could have. There's been this incident that's happened in Minnesota, actually. So the Democratic representative, Ilhan Omar, was attacked during a town hall. She was sprayed with an unknown substance by a 55 year old who's since been arrested and charged. Omar wasn't hurt. And we've had this question from Reese in South Wales who says, how does Donald Trump play the attack on Ilhan Omar? Surely people must be starting to think that the rhetoric against Somalis has gone too far. What do you think, Anthony?
Anthony
Well, Reese's question has been answered. Donald Trump has responded. He was asked by ABC during an interview earlier today about Ilhan Omar at attack and he said he thinks she's a fraud. I really don't think about that. He said she probably had herself sprayed. Knowing her, he was pressed by the interviewer and Trump said he hadn't seen the video of the attack and he hopes he doesn't have to bother seeing it. So dismissive, I think, certainly not giving any ground or expressing any kind of sympathy towards Ilhan Omar, despite this attack, which happened on video, and despite calls from Democrats and some Republicans for a condemnation of it and a hope that maybe Donald Trump would tone down his rhetoric, particularly directed at Omar, which he has been doing for weeks, months now, and towards the Somali community in Minnesota.
Sarah
Now, Donald Trump might not have seen the video of that attack. I have. And so for anyone else who has not seen it, this man has a syringe full of a sort of dark kind of amber colored liquid and he squirts it in Omar's, Omar's direction before he was bundled away. But, you know, we don't know what was in the syringe, although she was unhurt and she carried on making her speech and conducting the town hall. You know, it could have been really quite dangerous. And clearly Donald Trump isn't backing down. I mean, I think he has more criticism for Ilhan Omar than anybody else in Congress, any other Democrat. He clearly really loathes her. And you can see that when he's attacking her all the time. And there's a story running at the moment that she and her husband have filed their tax, taxes and declared much higher income than they've had before. Money that we're told her husband has made in his business. But Donald Trump's insisting, oh, she's obviously corrupt. There's obviously some fraud involved in her having made all of these millions of dollars and baselessly attacking her for that. And of course, it's his attacks on the Somali community in Minnesota and what was a big fraud scandal there that quite a number of Somalis were convicted for. That sort of led to the focus on Minnesota in the first place. And one of the reasons why Donald Trump decided to send ICE agents in there. He is absolutely coruscating about the country of Somalia and about Somalis who are in America already, saying he wants to see them all removed from the country. It's close to an obsession, Anthony.
Anthony
Yeah, I think so. He was talking about this as early as the end of last year, before the latest conflicts in Minnesota. Although it's one of the reasons why Trump ordered this surge of immigration enforcement in Minnesota to crack down on what he said was fraud. But obviously this has become a much bigger issue than that. But Ilhan Omar, Donald Trump seems to want to make her the face of what he says is Somali corruption, even though, as you mentioned, there's no evidence that her wealth or her family's wealth has anything to do with any of the corruption allegations in the state.
Sarah
We have one last question. MsPart by another Ameracaster who also lives in Minneapolis and wants to remain anonymous, who's asking us if we would consider exploring why Minnesota has become the flashpoint in the ICE and DHS action. Obviously, they say it's because this is where Renee Goode and Alex Pretty were killed and because this is where the Trump administration have decided to redouble their efforts. But it's also because it's a blue state, particularly evident in urban areas and almost exclusively in Minneapolis and St. Paul proper. Although we do have the typical US urban, rural political divide. In any case, they say a large liberal, community minded city in a progressive state with a collectivist and social, social democratic values, it makes sense why Minneapolis might be where people start to stand up. And Anthony, I have seen a lot of people in Minneapolis saying to Donald Trump, you picked the wrong city here. This was always where the resistance was going to come.
Marianna
Yeah.
Anthony
And it's kind of funny, Minnesota in general and Minneapolis has a reputation of being mild mannered. There's that saying, Minnesota nice. These kind of middle class Americans, middle of the country Americans with very polite values. But it has become a flashpoint not just for this, but if you remember back to the Black Lives Matter, George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis. That is what triggered all of the protests, some of which became violent in Minneapolis. And it is a place that has strong liberal values, although there is a sharp divide between the liberal values of the cities and the immigrant communities within the cities and the rural areas. Minnesota actually had trended towards Donald Trump in several of the recent presidential elections. It was a lot closer than many people expected because in the rural areas there's strong support for not only Trump's kind of populist rhetoric, but some of his anti immigrant rhetoric.
Sarah
That's really interesting. So when you think of the most liberal places in America, I would think of Portland, San Francisco, New York, but we're gonna have to add Minneapolis and St. Paul to that, are we?
Anthony
I suppose so. I mean, there's a long tradition of kind of populist liberal activism in the Midwest in places used to be places like Iowa and even in the Dakotas, but now it's mostly Minnesota. And part of that is because Minneapolis and St. Paul are big urban areas that do have more liberal voters than in some of the other rural states that I mentioned. But it is an interesting kind of dynamic that has played out in Minnesota, and it's fascinating to see these sometimes mild mannered or perceived to be mild mannered Minnesotans, moms and, and older retirees and, and nurses out on the streets protesting what ICE is doing and in some, some cases ending up in, in violent, fatal clashes with them.
Sarah
Okay, Anthony, Mariana, we better leave it there for today and pick this up again sometime soon. But for now we'll just say bye Bye.
Marianna
Bye Bye.
Sarah
Yeah.
Anthony
Thank you for listening to another episode. It is you, the Ameracaster, that makes AmericasT the community that it now is. If you like what you've heard, please do subscribe to this podcast on BBC Sounds or wherever you get your podcasts. We always want to hear your feedback as well. We look at every single bit of correspondence that we get so you can send us an email americastbc.com the WhatsApp is 443-301-239480 and you can get involved in the AmericasT discord server. The link to that is in the description. Till next time, Bye bye.
Date: January 28, 2026
Hosts: Sarah Smith, Anthony Zurcher, Marianna Spring (BBC News)
Summary by Americast Podcast Summarizer
This episode examines President Donald Trump’s attempts to "de-escalate" tensions in Minneapolis following the controversial killing of Alex Pretty, a U.S. citizen, by federal immigration agents (ICE). The team delves into the political fallout, the administration’s controversial immigration enforcement tactics, the administration's messaging, and the impact on both public perception and Trump's political support base. The hosts also field questions from listeners about accusations of ethnonationalism, media censorship, and the spark behind resistance movements in Minnesota.
[02:05 – 06:28]
[05:06 – 07:44]
[08:32 – 11:22]
[12:42 – 15:05]
[15:05 – 25:00]
[17:56 – 24:30]
[19:14 – 21:01]
[27:03 – 30:36]
[30:36 – 33:23]
Trump to Fox News:
"I don't like that he had a gun. I don't like that he had two fully loaded magazines. That's a lot of bad stuff." ([04:00])
Anthony on ICE leadership switch:
"So taking [Bovino] out of the equation at least gives the administration a chance to say, okay, we're putting someone else in here ... a change of tone, perhaps a change of attitude. We'll see if it's an actual change of policy." ([09:32])
Marianna on social media pushback:
"Quite a few of them have turned on Donald Trump over this." ([07:17])
Chris Medell, former GOP governor candidate (Minnesota):
"Driving while Hispanic is not a crime. Either is driving while Asian. At the end of the day, I have to look my daughters in the eye and tell them I believe I did what was right." ([25:11])
The tone is measured but direct, typical of BBC analysis, combining factual reporting with political nuance. The hosts blend on-the-ground observations, listener perspectives, and high-level political strategy, often quoting Trump, officials, and community members. Sarcasm and wry humor surface occasionally, aimed mainly at the inconsistencies in political messaging and policy.
This episode of Americast delivers a multi-layered analysis of how Trump’s approach to Minneapolis and ICE enforcement may be undermining his support base, aggravating racial and constitutional tensions, and raising big questions about narrative control and federal overreach. Listener contributions highlight the fear and confusion on the ground, while the hosts break down why this may represent a turning point in perceptions of Trump’s immigration crackdown.