Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (2:24)

What a stupid question.

Donald Trump (2:25)

Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein?

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (2:34)

Hi, it is Sarah here in the BBC's Washington bureau.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (2:37)

And it's Anthony right next to Sarah here in Washington, D.C. so much seems.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (2:42)

To be happening with Donald Trump and Venezuela. And we talked about this just two weeks ago. Americas can go back and listen to all of that, get a little bit more background on what's been going on on BBC Sounds or anywhere else that you get your podcast. But to bring people up to date, there was an attack on 16 October against a submarine in which two people were killed and there were two survivors. Then on the 17th, the Pentagon released a video of a military strike saying that three narco terrorists had been killed in that strike.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (3:13)

Right. We've had at least seven strikes now with at least 32 deaths. One happened on 16 October when the United States strikes struck a partially submersible submarine in the Caribbean Sea, killed two. But also for the first time, there were two survivors that the United States captured and then have since repatriated back to Ecuador, one of the countries and Colombia, the other one. That's kind of interesting. I mean, what do you do with those people? I mean, it was only a matter of time right, before there would be some survivors and the United States made the decision to send them back to their home countries and not prosecute them for violating American laws and drug trafficking.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (3:54)

Yeah. And given that Donald Trump has been so very, very clear that these are drug traffickers who are threatening America, you would think that he would want to see them in an American court. But that's gonna raise all kinds of questions, isn't it, about whether America actually has the authority to be doing this, whether they're in fact, I mean, breaking international law, breaking rules of war by just taking out ships they say are smuggling drugs when they've produced no evidence of that whatsoever.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (4:16)

Yeah, clearly it would have been hard to process them in American courts, but also apparently it's gonna be hard to process them in col Ecuadorian courts because Ecuador has since said they didn't have grounds, they didn't have enough evidence to prosecute them on drug trafficking charges, have released the Ecuadorian and the Colombian president has also condemned these strikes. And that's creating some tensions between the United States and Colombia, which is a traditional American ally.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (4:44)

Yeah, we'll get more into that a little bit later in the episode. Let's listen to Donald Trump himself justifying that attack which killed two and there were two survivors.

Donald Trump (4:54)

It was, we attacked a submarine and that was a drug carrying submarine built specifically for the transportation of massive amounts of drugs. Just so you understand, this was not an innocent group of people. I don't know too many people that have submarines. And that was an attack on a Drug carrying, loaded up submarine.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (5:20)

Yes, it's definitely suspicious, but the United States hasn't provided much evidence in the way of drug trafficking for these attacks. In particular ones that look more like fishing boats or speedboats than submarines. They have provided some justification. Pete Hegseth, who is the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of War, however you want the administration to call him, he is explaining it this way, drawing a line to the so called war on terror that started after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (5:54)

Yeah, that's right. He said that these cartels are the Al Qaeda of the Western Hemisphere who use violence, murder and terrorism to impose their will and threaten US national security and poison our people, he said. And Donald Trump and others have often said that these are drug smugglers who are bringing fentanyl into the United States and justifying these attacks by saying, you know, you might have four or five people on a boat, they'll kill 25,000Americans in numbers like that. Fentanyl's not produced in Venezuela yet. There's plenty of cocaine, although apparently it tends not to come through the Caribbean Sea. But a lot of it goes up the West Coast. Fentanyl is not something that will be on these boats. That's made in Mexico from precursor chemicals that come from China. I mean, some of the justification that the administration's giving for this just doesn't really hold water very well.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (6:46)

Right. And the way the United States government, the White House has presented it to Congress is that there is an ongoing armed conflict, that the Venezuelan drug traffickers are essentially unlawful combatants and that gives them justification for launching attacks on them. The same way that we saw drone strikes in Pakistan and Afghanistan against what the Bush administration and even the Obama administration had characterized as unlawful combatants. So it's the same sort of legal gray area we saw during that so called war on terror now being used to attack targets in the Caribbean. And maybe the reason is because this is international waters. There's no outside legal authority that could technically stop the United States from doing this. Congress, at least so far, has not shown any interest in trying to, to stop this or hold Trump accountable for violations of domestic law. The War Powers act, which, which requires administrations to justify the use of military force, ongoing use of military force to members of Congress. The Democrats brought a bill up to try to do that and the Republicans in a, in a partisan vote, voted it down.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (8:02)

So let's try and dig into what we think the politics of this are, because the US Is not going to win a war on drugs by taking out a Few dozen boats, which may be fishing boats, maybe smuggling drugs. I mean, that's, that's not going to solve the problem. Even if these were boats trafficking fentanyl into the United States. So what do we think is actually happening here? I think it's very noticeable that Donald Trump and lots of others in his administrations post videos of these boats being blown up in a very celebratory, self congratulatory way. They want people to know they're doing this. It's a bit of a flex.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (8:35)

Yeah. I think it's, it's an attempt to show that they are taking the drug war seriously in the same way that we saw video of people being deported, you know, loading up onto planes. I mean, it's almost propaganda. Right. It's being used to send a message to the American people that this administration is doing something, whether it's addressing undocumented migration or it's trying to stop drugs from coming in. But you're right, I mean, these are, you know, a handful of boats here and there. It's not going to make that much of a difference. Maybe it'll have some kind of a deterrent effect. But most of the drugs coming into this country are not coming on speedboats or partially submersible submarines in the Caribbean. It's coming across the US Mexico border. It's coming in through the mail. Fentanyl, as we pointed out in the past, is very potent and you can have a lot of doses in a small package, which is why Donald Trump could say, oh, we blew up a boat that had fentanyl on it enough to kill 200,000 people. I mean, yes, it's very potent. It could kill 200,000 people. It doesn't because it is cut and mixed and spread out over thousands of doses. But it is highly toxic and also highly dangerous.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (9:47)

I've been wondering whether or not the fact that this is Venezuela is also furthering the anti immigration deportation agenda. Because a huge number of migrants in the United States are from Venezuela because of what's happened to that country in recent years. We know the administration is very keen to find and import as many of them as they possibly can. Does it help to sort of characterize that country as somewhere that's importing drugs into America and demonize Venezuelans generally by showing that you have to take this kind of violent action against what you say is drug smugglers?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (10:21)

Yeah, I think that's definitely one of the factors here. I mean, there are multiple factors, I think when it comes to Venezuela. The first is that they are responsible for some, drug trafficking. The second is the immigration. The outflux of migrants fleeing the economic hardship, political persecution in Venezuela under the Maduro regime. A lot of them are going to Colombia. Colombia has a huge migrant challenge with all of these Venezuelans. And they've been pretty good about accepting them and attempting to integrate them into Colombian society. But that also leads to more people moving from Colombia up through towards the Americas. And then there is a general dissatisfaction with the authoritarian left wing socialist regime of Venezuela, something that has been angering particularly conservatives for quite some time now, going back to Donald Trump's first term, going back to Marco Rubio, the current Secretary of State, when he represented Florida, which has a very large population of Venezuelan expatriates, South American expatriates, who view the Maduro regime as on a par with the communists in Cuba. They're evil and they should be combated any way possible. So they're going to celebrate anything the United States does to try to put the screws in the Maduro regime. And while we haven't explicitly called, I believe, for regime change, it certainly seems to be maybe a subtext in all of this.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (11:47)

The all powerful Stephen Miller, who is the Deputy Chief of Staff in the White House, but seen as a big kind of intellectual force behind Trumpism, isn't he? He got involved this when he was asked about drug cartels that had infiltrated the Maduro's government in Venezuela.

Stephen Miller (12:03)

There's a $50 million reward for the return of Nicolas Maduro. Not just him, his henchmen have also been indicted. So it is a drug cartel that is running Venezuela. This is a very important point. It's not a government, it is a drug cartel, a narco trafficking organization that is running Venezuela. And this has been documented, documented in federal court and indictments have been secured. The people of Venezuela have been suffering and struggling under the reality of a nation that is so rich in resources, so rich in reserves, that is run by Maduro, the head of the Cartel de la Souls, that is absolutely one of the most ruthless criminal cartels on the planet. And many Americans may not realize that the drugs killing their kids are coming from Maduro, and also the criminal aliens killing their kids are coming from Maduro. So he's sending his drugs, he is sending his killers, his assassins into our communities. And he's working directly with other designated foreign terrorist organizations like the FARC and Colombia and all the Mexican drug cartels. So it's one continuous loop, $50 million.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (13:12)

Reward for capturing and bringing to the United States Nicolas Maduro. That's more than was ever on Osama bin Laden's head, I think. I mean, that's a pretty overt way of that. The US Wants to get rid of him.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (13:23)

If you listen to that clip, it's pretty clear that Stephen Miller, who is driving a lot of the policy decisions in this administration, as you point out, he's the person who's the point person on immigration in particular. But now he is apparently overseeing and directing some of these strikes on boats and overseeing the military operations in the Caribbean. He is putting a big target on Maduro and is holding him up as the central figure responsible for all of these ills, drugs and crime and undocumented migration, which Maduro has got a long track record of human rights abuses. Most Western nations have concluded that he lost the 2024 presidential election but rigged the voting in order to win. He was the heir of the Venezuelan government from Hugo Chavez who first came to power. Much more charismatic guy, but he died. And Maduro is now the second in line of this kind of left wing dictatorship that's been running Venezuela. And I think if you listen to Maduro now, he's getting concerned that maybe the United States is less interested in having some sort of negotiated settlement with the Venezuelan regime. Working with Maduro, which seemed like a possibility at the beginning of this year when Trump officials were engaging in negotiations about maybe lifting sanctions and getting some of the Venezuela's oil and reaching some sort of a step down in the tensions. And instead now we have Maduro here himself worrying about maybe even being invaded about military strikes on Venezuelan soil. Let's listen to President Nicolas Maduro directly appealing to Trump and the American people for peace during a televised address just last week. And he starts in Spanish and then switches, as if to emphasize the point of who he's talking to, switches to English. Tell the people of the United States no to war. We do not want war in the Caribbean or South America. No, not war, just peace.

Donald Trump (15:28)

No war, just pit on the people. United States, please, please, please, please.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (15:36)

He's appealing for peace, not war. Are we seriously saying there is any prospect of a full on armed conflict between the US And Venezuela? I mean, we did hear Donald Trump earlier saying that they were looking at land now, not just the sea. And there are something like 10,000 troops built up in Puerto Rico. So moving into the region along with other navy ships and other materiel. Is this just a threatening posture? I mean, the US Isn't going to go and invade Venezuela, is it?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (16:05)

That seems unlikely. What seems possibly more likely is targeting with airstrikes or missile strikes, forces on the land, or drug cartels on the land. Trump has talked about this before. Even in the first term, he was rumbling about maybe using US Military to strike cartels in Mexico. So I guess it wouldn't be too much of a leap to say, all right, well, maybe not Mexico because of the diplomatic ties we have with Mexico, but Venezuela, which we don't really care what the Maduro regime thinks about us. Let's start hitting things on their land. And obviously that is an escalation. And it's also not just destabilizing to the Maduro regime, which I think Americans may be perfectly fine with, and certainly the White House seems to be fine with, but it's destabilizing to the entire region. And already we're seeing signs of Colombia starting to object to this. The Colombian national, as we mentioned, several have been killed apparently, but also one has been captured and returned to Colombia. It is creating the potential for a regional crisis. And if we start bombing land targets, that's only going to get worse.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (17:09)

Yeah, Actually, the President of Colombia, Gustavo Petro, posted on social media after one of those attacks that a Colombian boat was adrift and had its distress signal up due to an engine failure when it was struck and said he was waiting for explanations from the US Government. That's, that's the most direct refutation of the idea that these are all drug smugglers that I've heard.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (17:32)

Right. And you've heard J.D. vance, the Vice president, joke about how it's not a good idea to go fishing in that part of the Caribbean Sea, almost dismissive of the risk of civilian casualties. And here we have the President of Colombia saying essentially that this was one of those unintended targets. And the United States has not provided any more details about that strike beyond just saying that everyone they're hitting with these missile attacks, they're all drug smugglers.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (17:59)

It's entirely possible that this threatening posture is meant to intimidate other countries in the region as well. Of course. I mean, Donald Trump hasn't been shy of accusing the Colombian president of being an illegal drug leader, saying that Gustavo Petro is a low rated, very unpopular leader with a fresh mouth towards America. He better close up these killing fields immediately or the United States will close them up for him. And it won't be done nicely, he said, and then announced that all US Subsidies and payments to the country are being canceled. So, I mean, he's. Yeah, I mean, he's, he's, he's throwing himself around the region a bit. And then the New York Times came out with a story, didn't they, saying that he had authorized covert CIA activity in Venezuela, which he was asked about in the Oval Office.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (18:46)

Why did you authorize the CIA to go into Venezuela? And is there more information you can share about these strikes on the alleged.

Donald Trump (18:53)

Well, I can't do that. I authorize for two reasons, really. Number one, they have emptied their prisons into the United States of America. They came in through the. Well, they came in through the border. They came in because we had an open border policy. And they've entered their. They've allowed thousands and thousands of prisoners, mental institution people from mental institutions, insane asylums emptied out into the United States. We're bringing them back. But that's a really bad. And they did it at a level that probably many, many countries have done it, but not like Venezuela. They were down and dirty. And the other thing are drugs. We have a lot of drugs coming in from Venezuela and a lot of the Venezuelan drugs come in through the sea, so you get to see that. But we're going to stop them by land. Also, does the CIA have authority to take out Maduro? Oh, I don't want to answer a question like that. That's a ridiculous question for me to be given. Not really a ridiculous question, but wouldn't it be a ridiculous question for me to answer?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (19:54)

Yeah, that's remarkable. I mean, the President acknowledging that the CIA could be operating in Venezuela. I don't know. This may date me, but do you remember the movie Clear and Present danger in the 90s? I mean, the central premise of this is based on a Tom Clancy book with Harrison Ford. The central premise was that the president got so fed up with drug deaths and cartels operating in South America that he launched a covert military operation in Colombia that predictably led to complications, American deaths. And the big finale was when this covert operation was exposed to the public and Congress and there were oversight hearings and it became a huge political scandal. Well, here we are, the President of the United States now just saying, yeah, this is what we're doing. Not only are we bombing, acknowledging that we're bombing targets in the Caribbean, but now we're acknowledging that we're launching covert actions. It turns the premise of that movie on its head and it kind of shows how differently Donald Trump operates than past politicians.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (20:57)

Is it still a covert operation when you've said the quiet part out loud and admitted that it's going on?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (21:02)

It's an overt operation, I suppose. You know, you talked about Colombia and the Trump administration. Trump himself has some history with Colombia as well. It was, I think, late January, he threatened to remove aid to Colombia if they didn't accept repatriated Colombian citizens. And that was a big diplomatic dust up in Colombia. Back down. And then you were up in Unga, I think just a few weeks ago, Petro was on the streets protesting along with people who were decrying the immigration enforcement that the Trump administration was doing. And that really ticked off Trump. And I think they tried to revoke his visa authorization for being on U.S. soil. And so now this is just the latest bit of tension between Petro and Trump. And it seems like this one might be the worst of them all.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (21:51)

Amer Casters might be thinking at this point about how many times we've told them that Donald Trump wants to put America first, not get involved in any more foreign wars, isn't interested in military engagement overseas. I'm wondering how this fits in with all of that. Do you think he sees a clear difference between boots on the ground with American ground forces and any other kind of enforcement action that can be taken from the air, as you said?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (22:16)

Right. It's, it's lower risk. It's, it's cleaner. He's shown a willingness to use American missiles in the past. I mean, they're bombers, obviously. In Iran recently, in his first term, he used missile strikes on a Syrian air base. It is something I think he feels comfortable doing that doesn't lead to the risk of American casualties. He's perfectly happy having American military hit a button and make things blow up. But committing US Forces on the ground, I think he understands. And, you know, he's a student of history and modern American politics. He knows the political risks of American casualties. And that seems to be the line that he's drawn. And one of the reasons why it's unlikely that American military forces might actually show up in Caracas trying to overthrow the Maduro regime.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (23:02)

Now, he also is talking all the time, including this week, about seeing himself as a peacemaker, still celebrating the ceasefire that he insists will hold in the Middle east, continuing to talk about trying to sort out the war in Ukraine. Do you think there's a tension between that and these kind of actions? I mean, he would say that actually, you know, trying to bring law and order to Venezuela, trying to stop deadly drug smuggling is part of bringing peace to the world?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (23:29)

Presumably, yeah, that's a good question. I'm going to be traveling with him next week and in Asia, I might ask him if he thinks of bombing boats in the Caribbean is. Could impact his bid for a Nobel Peace Prize. I suspect his answer will not be friendly, but I think there is very clearly a tension that if you're blowing things up, if you're bombing Iran and you're bombing Venezuela, that's contributing to increased tension and turmoil and destabilizing regions. It's not necessarily the kind of thing you want on your resume when you're presenting yourself as this global peacemaker.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (24:02)

And yet this year's Nobel Peace Prize, when Donald Trump so wanted it, actually went to the opposition leader in Venezuela, Maria Corinna Machado. And they said it was for her tireless work promoting democratic rights for the people of Venezuela and her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy. So sounds like she's on the same side as Donald Trump there, doesn't it?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (24:27)

Yeah. And Donald Trump called her to congratulate her, and she actually told the BBC what that call was like.

Maria Corina Machado (24:33)

It was a very good conversation. I was able to convey to him our appreciation and how grateful the Venezuelan people are for what he's doing, not only in the Americas, but around the world for peace, for freedom, for democracy. And I was very glad that we have a chance to talk yesterday. The regime in Venezuela is a criminal structure. Maduro is the head of a drug cartel, and as such, it sustains themselves on the criminal flows from their illicit activities. And we need the international community to cut those flows that are not only used for corruption, but also for repression, violence, and terror.

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (25:24)

One more thought, Anthony, that has occurred to me is whether these actions against the boats in the Caribbean, firing missiles at them, killing people without any evidence, Is this also part of Donald Trump seeking to expand the power of the presidency, or at least test just exactly what he can get away with? We've seen it happening in the US as he's sending National Guard troops into American cities and the like. Is this an international way of him saying, you know, look at the action I can take without needing legal authority or Congress to agree to it or anything?

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (26:00)

Yeah, I think it's. He's testing boundaries. These are boundaries that have been tested by other presidents. As I pointed out, Obama and George W. Bush used these kind of strikes to hit Al Qaeda and to suspected terrorists all over the globe. Trump is using it now in a different theater, but using those justifications that were presented by Obama and Bush in order to advance what his agenda is. So he's finding new ways to push the boundaries or in different directions or using that precedent in different ways that maybe as you point out, does expand what he can do. If you can say anything is possibly an enemy combatant, anything even drug related, not directly military or terrorist related, is a target, then what check is there on presidential power, at least in international arena?

Sarah (BBC Washington Bureau) (26:49)

Anyway, we should probably leave it there for this episode. Next we're going to be talking about Zoran Mamdami, the Democratic candidate for New York City mayor who may well win there next month. We'll tell you all about him and his democratic socialist platform, but for now we'll just say bye. Bye.

Anthony (BBC Washington Bureau) (27:03)

Bye.

Commercial Announcer (27:07)

Ameracast ameracast from BBC News.

Podcast Host (27:10)

Well, look, thanks for listening all the way to the end of today's AmericasT. You are now officially an AmericasT. It is, of course, a ride, a wild ride, navigating the US News, particularly in the era of Trump. You have made it. If you have a comment, a question about the things we've talked about or anything at all actually, get in touch with us. The email is americastbc.co.uk. the WhatsApp is 033-01-239480. We answer your questions every single week, actually on the podcast, so keep them coming. You can join the online community as well on Discord. The link is in the podcast description on your app. We will be back with another podcast very soon, so until then, see you later. Bye.

Energy Trust of Oregon Announcer (28:07)

At Energy Trust of Oregon, we understand that energy isn't just what happens when you flip a switch, it's what happens afterwards. It's a home that can provide both shelter and peace of mind. It's a business that can run more efficiently and keep their dream alive. And it's communities that can thrive today and flourish tomorrow. That's energy. And that's why we partner with local utility companies to help you save energy and lower costs. For cash, incentives and resources that can help power your life, visit energytrust.org.