Loading summary
A
You are listening to an art media podcast. It's Friday, july 17th. This episode was recorded at 6:00pm new york time on Thursday. I'm deborah pardes and this is arc news daily. For the first time during this round of fighting, the US has attacked near Iran, Iran's capital. According to Israeli reports, it made the IDF raise its alert level overnight. Israel is watching closely to see whether it may jump back into the war. In a statement yesterday, US Central Command said it also hit Iranian air defense sites, missile and drone capabilities and coastal surveillance facilities. Iranian officials say the strikes have killed more than 35 people and wounded over 300 during the past week. Iran retaliated with missiles and drones at US Bases in Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain. So it appears the region is slipping back into an all out war. But the White House insists the two sides are still talking. Here's press secretary Caroline Levitt at a press conference yesterday. Iran very much continues to talk to the United States of America and express that they want to make a deal with us because they are suffering devastating blows on behalf of our United States military. That may be true, but behind closed doors, Trump is leaning toward expanding fighting even more. The Wall Street Journal reported that he met with advisors at the White House on Wednesday, supposedly to discuss several options. They include striking Iranian energy infrastructure, sending ground troops in to take over areas near the Strait of Hormuz, like Kharg island, or bombing the underground nuclear site Pickaxe Mountain. At the same time, in anticipation of more strikes, Iran has asked its proxy, the Houthis, to stand by at ports near the Bab El Mandeb Strait, Reuters reported. The Houthis are ready to launch missile and drone attacks on ships, which would mean the ongoing oil crisis will only get worse. An investigation revealed this week that Israel had quietly paid a former Trump campaign manager to run an influence operation.
B
It lists a bun of people who have quite literally been paid by a former Trump campaign person.
A
Just one day after that investigation came out, the vice president opened up on the Joe Rogan podcast, which has one of the biggest audiences in the world.
B
You know, my response to that is, well, go to hell.
A
So here's how we got here. According to a Time Magazine investigation, days after the US And Iran reached a ceasefire last month, a senior US Official noticed something odd. MAGA influencers were trash the deal online. In very similar language, all at the same time, the official traced back the pattern to a guy named Brad Parscale. He ran Trump's 2020 campaign. The contract called for 100 pieces of content a month it was mostly aimed at Gen Z viewers. There was also an effort to shape how AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini describe Israel and the war, according to the article. Israel paid $1.5 million a month for it. An Israeli official was quoted saying the goal was to prevent young conservatives from turning against Israel. The effort may have been a response to the campaign Iran has been waging. Beyond fueling negative comments online, it's also been behind a wave of violent attacks in the UK and Europe, according to a CNN report from May. But Israel's effort hasn't worked. Favorable views of Israel among Americans have hit their lowest point in decades, and the share of young Republicans with an unfavorable view has climbed to 57%, the Israeli official told TIME. We are pissed at Brad Parscale. He was supposed to make things better. We paid him lots of money, but what did he do with it? Things have only gotten worse. Inside the White House, the worry is bigger than Israel's PR problem. Officials say they became concerned that the effort was trying to taint public support of the memorandum of understanding with Iran. And that brings us back to Vance. His conversation with Joe Rogan was published on Wednesday, and in it Vance made clear he'd read the Times story and wasn't happy about it.
B
When I open up the pages of Time magazine and I see that there's a literal foreign influence campaign being funded to tank the very deal that I was pursuing and oh, by the way, many of the people who were receiving that money were actually attacking me in completely dishonest ways. You know, my response to that is, well, go to hell. I'm going to do what I have to do for the American people. I represent Americans first.
A
Vance said he doesn't mind that Israel tries to influence American opinion. He said lots of countries do that, including Qatar and Russia. But he added that he knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to keep the war going and block U.S. efforts at reaching a deal. It's not the first time he's criticized Israel, and his comments reflect the widening public rift between the two countries, which could continue to expand if Vance becomes the next president. We should also note Israel's Ministry of Foreign affairs called the Times article defamatory. It said the the ministry lawfully contracted with an experienced digital agency to combat the dissemination of hatred against Jews and Israel and to strengthen support for the strategic alliance between the United States and Israel. It also said all of our activities are transparent and conducted in strict compliance with U.S. law. We hide nothing and we obfuscate nothing. We certainly do not interfere in any US foreign or domestic policy. Today is the final day of the 25th Knesset. It ended with a fueled and intensive legislative blitz. Apart from some of the highly controversial laws we reported on earlier this week, the Knesset also voted for a few other notable bills. A bill expanding gender segregation in universities, another undermining the authority of the Attorney General, and a media law that benefits pro Netanyahu outlets. According to Israel's communication Minister, the Prime Minister was the driving force behind it. He said, the mission you assigned me four years ago was completed today. He also added, we won the deep state. The Supreme Court is expected to strike down most, if not all, of these highly controversial bills. In fact, it's already frozen one of the Haredi draft laws. So why then is Netanyahu and his coalition pushing so hard to get them passed? ARC Media contributor Nadav Eyal addressed this in the latest episode of Inside Call Me Back. He said, it all comes down to the rabbis and Netanyahu's desire to stay in power.
C
The rabbis don't understand the Supreme Court is going to strike down the law. The rabbis are to some degree alienated. The Haredi ultra Orthodox politicians need to prove to their own public and mainly to the rabbis that they've done everything. And then they can blame the Supreme Court. Netanyahu needs to prove to the rabbis that he is still the only person in Israeli politics that is willing to actually sacrifice political capital to actually almost commit suicide or at least shoot himself in the leg for his alliance with the ultra Orthodox because they threatened him to, that they are done with him. And what he has been doing the last two months is mainly trying to convince the ultra Orthodox that the bloc isn't dead. And he was willing to sacrifice his public relations, his the standing of the Likud, everything, because if he doesn't have a bloc, he doesn't stand a chance to form a coalition. It's more important than the elections, because in Israel, you have an election, then you have to form a government. You can have more seats in the Knesset, but if you can't form a government, you're over and done with. And that's the reason why they went through a process of passing laws they know are dead on arrival.
A
There's also a deeper question, what does this all mean for Israel going forward? We put that to Yonatan Adiri, host of the what's yous Number? Podcast. He says the final week of the Knesset marks the end of Israel.
D
2.0 what we're witnessing is not just political conflict. It is, in my view, a generational transition, the final nails in the coffin of the project of the founding sons and daughters who recreated Israel in 1985. The coming elections in this context will be decisive. They will either bring this new generation to power or trap Israel in a period of what can be described as zombie politics, a system that continues to somehow function but no longer adapts and deliver for middle of the road Israelis. And that limbo, if it does indeed come to bear, will not be stable. It will deepen unrest until the transition becomes unavoidable. At the same time, the social contract itself is under strain. A growing share of Israeli society no longer accepts deeply insular forms of autonomy. Not in the parts of the ultra Orthodox community where isolation challenges the very idea of a shared national project, and also not in parts of the Arab Israeli community where violence and criminality are displacing pathways of integration. This tension is not peripheral, it is pivotal. Because if Israel 3.0 emerges, it will not be defined only by geopolitics or tech, but by whether a new shared framework and political idea can emerge at all. I believe that these dynamics are the real drivers of what we saw this week at the Knesset, above and beyond the petty politics of preserving the coalition.
A
You can find a link to what's yous Number? And inside Call me back in the show. Notes I'm Deborah Pardes, and this is ArkNews Daily. Shabbat Shalom.
E
Hi, I'm Daniel Hartman, president of the Sholem Hartman Institute in Jerusalem.
F
And I'm Yossi Klein Halevi, senior fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute.
E
What's more important? To be feared by your enemies or morally true to yourself?
F
Should Israel strive to be a nation among nations? Or should it accept the fact that it is now a fortress apart?
E
What do Israelis and Diaspora Jews owe each other? If you're Jewish or a friend, an
F
ally, these questions have been gnawing at you these past few years.
E
For some of you, like for us, these questions have been keeping you up at night. And for some, they've been simmering in the background, waiting for answers.
F
But dilemmas don't always have clear answers. What they do deserve are honest and respectful debates.
E
And as it happens, Yossi and I love to challenge each other to get to the bottom of things.
F
We look at current events through a lens that speaks to us most deeply, a Jewish lens.
E
So if today's Jewish dilemmas are on your mind, tune in to our conversation on For Heaven's sake, a partnership between ARC Media and the Sholem Hartman Institute.
F
You can find, for heaven's sake on Apple, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever you get your podcasts.
E
See you there.
Episode Date: July 17, 2026
Host: Deborah Pardes (A)
This episode examines the escalating military conflict between the US and Iran and its ripple effects throughout the Middle East, particularly for Israel. It also delves into the recent revelations about Israel's digital influence campaigns targeting American politics, a legislative blitz in the Israeli Knesset, and the broader generational transformation in Israeli society—framing it as the close of "Israel 2.0." Thought leaders contribute to an intense discussion about what lies ahead for the region, the future of Israeli democracy, and Jewish identity worldwide.
“When I open up the pages of Time magazine and I see that there’s a literal foreign influence campaign being funded to tank the very deal that I was pursuing and oh, by the way, many of the people who were receiving that money were actually attacking me in completely dishonest ways. You know, my response to that is, well, go to hell. I’m going to do what I have to do for the American people. I represent Americans first.” — J.D. Vance ([04:51])
"Netanyahu needs to prove to the rabbis that he is still the only person in Israeli politics that is willing to actually sacrifice political capital to actually almost commit suicide or at least shoot himself in the leg for his alliance with the ultra Orthodox..." — Nadav Eyal ([07:43])
"What we're witnessing is not just political conflict. It is, in my view, a generational transition, the final nails in the coffin of the project of the founding sons and daughters who recreated Israel in 1985... If Israel 3.0 emerges, it will not be defined only by geopolitics or tech, but by whether a new shared framework and political idea can emerge at all." — Yonatan Adiri ([09:14])
"Iran very much continues to talk to the United States of America and express that they want to make a deal with us because they are suffering devastating blows on behalf of our United States military." ([00:34])
“Go to hell. I’m going to do what I have to do for the American people. I represent Americans first.” ([04:51])
“If you don’t have a bloc, you don’t stand a chance to form a coalition. It’s more important than the elections, because in Israel, you have an election, then you have to form a government ... and that’s the reason why they went through a process of passing laws they know are dead on arrival.” ([08:45])
"This is a generational transition ... it will deepen unrest until the transition becomes unavoidable." ([09:14])
The discussion is urgent, candid, and slightly somber, reflecting the sense of a pivotal historical moment for both Israel and its relationship with the US. Contributors blend hard news with analytical depth, giving context to fast-paced developments. There’s a clear sense of generational change and underlying tension about the region’s stability and Israel’s future.
(Links available in show notes.)
This summary covers all major content segments, omitting ads and partnership promotions. For ongoing coverage, subscribe to Ark News Daily.