Armstrong & Getty On Demand

Episode: "A Stupid Person Jail" (December 2, 2025)
Hosts: Jack Armstrong & Joe Getty

Episode Overview

In this thought-provoking and lively episode, Armstrong & Getty tackle the intersection of true crime media coverage, society’s relationship with empathy in the internet age, modern misunderstandings of economic terms like inflation, and the existential risks posed by unchecked artificial intelligence. The hosts use their signature mix of sarcasm and candid debate to question popular narratives and highlight the consequences of poorly informed public opinion—sometimes proposing tongue-in-cheek solutions like a "stupid person jail.” The episode is both intellectually engaging and darkly humorous, especially in discussions about AI, economic ignorance, and media sensationalism.

Main Discussion Topics & Insights

1. Media Coverage of High-Profile Murder Trials

Timestamps: 02:40–07:53

• Case Overview: Armstrong and Getty discuss the murder trial of a defendant with notable looks ("good looking eyebrowed scumbag"). They scrutinize both procedural issues (evidence possibly suppressed due to police missteps) and the media’s tendency to humanize defendants by focusing on their appearance.
• Society's Disconnect from Empathy:
  • Joe argues the internet—and the "iconization" of people on social media—has eroded fundamental human empathy.

    "They've lost their sense of their fellow humans' humanity." (Joe, 04:41)

  • Jack shares personal anecdotes about online cruelty and acknowledges his own detachment when discussing celebrities.
• Media Idolization: Both hosts are frustrated by coverage portraying the defendant as a “folk hero” because of his appearance, warning that it warps public understanding of justice and morality.
• Proposed Solution (tongue-in-cheek): Jack suggests that anyone supporting the accused solely because of looks should be jailed for stupidity:

  "Anybody who's out there in support of the dude because he's so handsome needs to be put in jail. Because they're that stupid. They're a danger to society. A stupid jail, a stupid person jail." (Jack, 07:24)

2. Financial Realities vs. Consumer Behavior

Timestamps: 09:41–11:10

• Economic Paradox: The hosts question how robust Black Friday shopping is possible when personal financial indicators (missed payments, maxed-out credit cards, people living paycheck-to-paycheck) are so bleak.
• Data Analysis: Jack reads a listener text noting that while Black Friday sales were up 3%, prices rose 7%, meaning people actually bought less:

  “Sales were up, but things are way more expensive. So if you bought the same amount of stuff as last year, they would be up. Right?” (Jack, 10:37)

• Inflation Misunderstandings: Joe teases a later segment revealing “we all have inflation backwards.”

  "Inflation is not what we all say it is. We have it backwards and it's important.” (Joe, 10:46)

3. The Corruption of Language: What Inflation Really Means

Timestamps: 14:28–22:26

• Shifting Definitions: Joe examines how the meaning of 'inflation' has changed. Originally, it referred to artificial expansion of the money supply; now, it’s simply rising prices.

  “Inflation means one thing, the artificial expansion of the money supply and or credit. But over time, it’s been redefined to describe the consequences of inflation rather than its cause.” (Joe, 17:08)

• Political Consequences:
  • This change helps politicians and central banks avoid blame for policies that actually devalue money.
  • Joe laments that we no longer have language to discuss the true causes.
• Personal Impact: Jack notes how years of inflation have eroded real net worth for average people, especially savers.
• Who Benefits: Joe points out that those closest to the “points of entry” for new money (borrowers, banks, government contractors) reap the most benefit, while ordinary citizens lose out.

4. Short-Term Thinking and Societal Doom Loops

Timestamps: 22:26–23:04

• Holiday Spending vs. Personal Finance: The hosts express skepticism about America’s ability to postpone gratification—personal or political:

  "We have complete inability to say no to ourselves personally or politically." (Joe, 22:52)

• Short-Termism: Jack laments, “We are really short term thinkers,” setting up an existential segway to AI and doom.

5. Existential Risks from Artificial Intelligence and “P Doom”

Timestamps: 23:04–41:03

• Defining ‘P Doom’: Jack introduces “P Doom,” a common AI risk term meaning the probability that AI will drive humanity to extinction.

  "What's your P Doom? ...the percentage you believe the likelihood of complete doom because of AI.” (Jack, 23:04)

• Shifting from Activist to Observer:
  • Jack’s research and doom debates lead to growing pessimism but also resignation about slowing AI progress.
  • He’s disturbed by the gullibility of some AI experts who naively believe in U.S.-China cooperation on AGI, calling them “children”:

    "You're so much smarter than me when it comes to coding computer. But so much stupider than me in... not having the ability to recognize that China's one goal as a country is to pass us up and dominate the world, you child." (Jack, 32:04)

• Debate on AI Regulation: Armstrong & Getty note that attempts to regulate AI are likely futile, especially given global competition (notably from China).
• AI Expert Risk Assessments:
  • Elon Musk’s P Doom: 10–20%
  • Many current and former AI safety researchers: 20–50%
  • Some, like Eliezer Yudkowsky, are at 99%
  • The hosts are appalled by the idea that humanity is proceeding with technology the experts themselves think could easily wipe us out.
• Dark Humor & Acceptance:
  • Joe jokes about the only practical response: “I choose not to [worry]. I can’t do anything about it, so I'm going to blissfully pretend it's not happening.” (Joe, 39:34)
  • Biblical Analogies: The hosts connect humanity’s self-destructive nature to Adam & Eve and Noah’s Ark:

    “We've acquired the knowledge that we cannot handle and it will kill us.” (Joe, 40:12)
    “There is some Adam and Eve in the garden thing going on there, no doubt about it.” (Jack, 40:23)

6. Other Notable Segments

Lion Attack at Brazilian Zoo

Timestamps: 26:47–29:10

• A discussion about a man who entered a lion enclosure and was killed. The hosts debate whether people would watch such an event, with Jack postulating, "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes." (Joe, 27:37)
• Both find it refreshing that the zoo didn't blame (or euthanize) the lion, agreeing, “That tiger didn’t go crazy. It went tiger.” (Jack, 27:27)

Political News & Regime Change

Timestamps: 44:08–46:41

• National Review’s take on Trump needing congressional approval to use military force in Venezuela. Neither host thinks Congress would approve.
• Jack mocks drug cartel nicknames: "If I'm gonna be a high up drug kingpin, I don't want to be the Chicken." (Jack, 45:53)

Seattle Homelessness and Corporate Exodus

Timestamps: 46:41–47:41

• Seattle’s growing homeless problem in tourist areas, with Microsoft moving a major conference to Las Vegas out of safety concerns.

Brief Touches on Other Topics

Timestamps: Scattered throughout

• MRI confusion (14:28–15:40): The hosts cannot believe anyone would undergo a medical procedure without knowing what it's for, sparking jokes about “MRI reveal parties.”
• Leftist corruption of language, gender debates, and misuse of the phrase “gender affirming care” (16:00–17:08).
• Humorous, sardonic recurring ads and fake spokesperson commentary pepper segments.

Notable Quotes & Moments

• On Stupid Person Jail

  "Anybody who's out there in support of the dude because he's so handsome needs to be put in jail. Because they're that stupid... A stupid jail, a stupid person jail. It can be pretty nice. Could be like the place they got Ghislaine Maxwell... but you got to be away from the public if you're supporting this guy because of his eyebrows."
  — Jack Armstrong (07:24)

• On Social Media and Empathy

  "They've lost their sense of their fellow humans' humanity."
  — Joe Getty (04:41)

• On Inflation

  “Inflation means one thing, the artificial expansion of the money supply and or credit. But over time, it’s been redefined to describe the consequences of inflation rather than its cause... There’s no term left to signify the cause... you cannot talk about something that has no name, you cannot fight it."
  — Joe Getty (17:08, 19:00)

• On Short-Termism

  “We have complete inability to say no to ourselves personally or politically.”
  — Joe Getty (22:52)
  “We are really short term thinkers.”
  — Jack Armstrong (22:56)

• On AI Naivete

  "...He was all about how we've just gone overboard with thinking China is our enemy and we need to work with China. China and us can work together to create an AI. And I thought, you are freaking nuts, you child.”
  — Jack Armstrong (31:59)

• On AI Extinction Risk

  “The fact that there are lots of people that [think] 50%, how is this not a bigger conversation?”
  — Jack Armstrong (36:59)

• Biblical Analogy for Technological Doom

  “We've acquired the knowledge that we cannot handle and it will kill us... There is some Adam and Eve in the garden thing going on there, no doubt about it.”
  — Joe Getty & Jack Armstrong (40:12–40:23)

Key Segment Timestamps

• 02:40–07:53 — Media & public reaction to murder trial, “stupid person jail”
• 09:41–11:10 — Personal finance vs. Black Friday spending; inflation set-up
• 14:28–22:26 — Language manipulation, real meaning of inflation, who wins/loses
• 23:04–41:03 — AI doom, P Doom debate, China, expert risk spectrum, existential resignation
• 26:47–29:10 — Lion attack at Brazilian zoo, human folly, animal behavior
• 44:08–46:41 — U.S. Venezuela policy, drug kingpin nicknames, media double standards
• 46:41–47:41 — Seattle homelessness, corporate retreat for safety

Tone & Style

• Candid, Wry, and Intellectually Curious: The hosts employ sarcasm and dark humor to explore uncomfortable truths, creating an engaging yet sobering listening experience.
• Mix of Sincerity and Satire: Outlandish solutions like “stupid person jail” lampoon genuinely troubling societal roles for ignorance and media complicity.
• Accessible but Nuanced: Even as they break down economic or technological concepts, the hosts remain relatable, using analogies and pop culture references.

Conclusion

This episode is a quintessential example of Armstrong & Getty's blend of social criticism, economic and technological skepticism, and dark, engaging wit. The hosts interrogate the dangerous power of media narratives, challenge the public’s economic illiteracy, and raise alarms about humanity’s heedless rush towards potential self-destruction via AI—all the while keeping listeners entertained and provoked. Whether you’re interested in true crime, economics, media critique, or existential tech anxiety, this episode is a stimulating listen.

For more, follow Armstrong & Getty On Demand or visit their website for past episodes!