Duping & Vengence

Summary

Armstrong & Getty On Demand: Episode Summary – "Duping & Vengeance"

Release Date: July 24, 2025 | Host: Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty | Source: iHeartPodcasts

In the "Duping & Vengeance" episode of Armstrong & Getty On Demand, hosts Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty delve into a series of pressing political and social issues, intertwining discussions on media manipulation, government actions, and the contentious topic of transgender rights. The episode navigates through complex narratives, offering listeners a critical perspective on recent developments in U.S. politics and societal debates.

---

1. Media Coverage and Intelligence Claims Against Trump

The conversation opens with Jack Armstrong expressing frustration over the perceived lack of media coverage regarding serious allegations against former President Donald Trump. He states:

"I just, I don't understand the way the world works anymore. I would have thought that if the director of national intelligence of one presidential administration comes out and says a previous president committed all kinds of crimes and needs to go to jail, that would be the biggest story in the country. But it's not being covered really anywhere except for Fox."
[02:08]

Armstrong emphasizes the significance of these allegations, suggesting that they represent one of the "biggest scandals in U.S. history." The hosts express skepticism about the media's selective reporting, highlighting a disconnect between the gravity of the claims and their public coverage.

---

2. Department of Justice Actions on Transgender Medical Procedures

Shifting focus, Armstrong introduces a segment on the Department of Justice's recent actions targeting transgender medical procedures for minors. He references a statement from Pam Bondi:

"Medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice."
[03:36]

The discussion underscores the DOJ's efforts to subpoena over 20 doctors and clinics nationwide, labeling transgender medical interventions on children as "medical malpractice" and "cruelty to children." Both hosts agree on the severity of the term "mutilate," with Armstrong questioning its appropriateness:

"Do you think that's too far or appropriate?"
[03:36]

Getty supports the use of the term, arguing that the medical procedures cause "permanent physical changes," deeming "mutilate" as "perfectly reasonable."

The conversation further critiques California's State Senator Scott Wiener's bill, which aims to protect transgender medical practices. Armstrong sarcastically refers to California as "Cal Unicornia" and labels proponents like Wiener as "sicko," highlighting the polarized nature of the debate.

---

3. Political Reactions and Debates on Transgender Issues

The hosts explore the broader political ramifications of the DOJ's actions, touching upon the psychological tactics employed by both sides of the transgender debate. Armstrong draws parallels between past civil rights victories and current transgender policies, suggesting a pattern of creating new issues to sustain political momentum.

A notable segment involves a mock rapid-fire Q&A with a guest representing conservative viewpoints on transgender issues. The guest firmly rejects the notion that biological males should compete in female sports, support for hormone treatments for minors, and the idea that a man can become a woman. Armstrong humorously critiques the guest's evasiveness, highlighting the challenges in addressing transgender topics within political discourse.

Furthermore, Armstrong cites an exchange with Megyn Kelly interviewing Rahm Emanuel, emphasizing the difficulty Democrats face in maintaining a cohesive stance on transgender matters without appearing weak or inconsistent.

---

4. Intelligence Community Allegations and Media Silence

Returning to the initial topic, Armstrong discusses Tulsi Gabbard's press conference where she accused former President Barack Obama and his national security team of orchestrating a false intelligence narrative to undermine Donald Trump. He summarizes Gabbard's claims:

"There is irrefutable evidence that details how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false... They conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016."
[24:14]

Armstrong laments the media's failure to adequately report on these allegations, noting that only Fox and similar outlets have covered the story. He questions the integrity of intelligence assessments and the potential manipulation of information to influence election outcomes.

---

5. Final Thoughts and Future Discussions

As the episode draws to a close, Armstrong reflects on the intertwined nature of politics and intelligence operations, expressing concern over the long-term implications for U.S. governance and international relations. He underscores the complexity of uncovering the truth in a media landscape rife with fragmentation and misinformation.

The hosts tease upcoming topics, including the impact of artificial intelligence on tech giants like Google, signaling a continuation of their critical analysis of current events in future episodes.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Jack Armstrong: "I would have thought that if the director of national intelligence of one presidential administration comes out and says a previous president committed all kinds of crimes and needs to go to jail, that would be the biggest story in the country."
  [02:08]

• Pam Bondi (quoted by Armstrong): "Medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice."
  [03:36]

• Jack Armstrong: "You are spending now. I don't know eight minutes on this. There's 50 million."
  [14:14]

• Tulsi Gabbard (summarized by Getty): "They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims."
  [26:21]

• Jack Armstrong: "We deserve accountability. Not gonna get it."
  [26:33]

---

Episode Conclusion

"Duping & Vengeance" offers a critical examination of media biases, government overreach, and the ongoing debates surrounding transgender rights in the United States. Through incisive dialogue and pointed observations, Armstrong and Getty present a narrative that challenges mainstream perspectives, urging listeners to question the information they receive and seek out underlying truths in complex political landscapes.

Transcript

[Jack Armstrong]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Joe Getty]

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? WashablesOfAs.com has your back featuring the Annabe collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return, shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back. Upgrade [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may app.

[Michael]

Broadcasting live.

[Jack Armstrong]

From the Abraham Lincoln radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

Armstrong and Getty.

And now here's Armstrong and Getty.

There's still a lot of talk about how awful it was that Trump forced CBS to fire Colbert. Have some stats around that that are pretty illuminating. We'll get to a little bit later. Also, I opened the show saying I've lost the ability to grasp news flow. I just, I don't understand the way the world works anymore. I would have thought that if the director of national intelligence of one presidential administration comes out and says a previous president committed all kinds of crimes and needs to go to jail, that would be the biggest story in the country. But it's not being covered really anywhere except for Fox.

Right. And she implicated his DNI at the same time.

Yeah.

Which is interesting.

Well, this would be the biggest scandal in U. S. History easily.

I think so. Yeah.

And it didn't really make the news. So there you go. But more on that later.

These are odd times. First, though, before we get to that, it's a gender bending madness update.

[Joe Getty]

I kept hearing about this thing called.

[Jack Armstrong]

Del Loco.

We're in a brave new world. It's dem on dem Violence edition of the gender bending madness update. It's more a preview of the violence to come. And we'll get to that in a moment. But first, a couple of stories for you. The Trump Department of Justice subpoenaed more than 20 doctors and medical clinics nationwide that perform transgender medical procedures on children. Quote from Pam Bondi, medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice, as well they should, given the fact that multiple reports now in Britain, in the Netherlands, in the United States say these medical procedures are unsupportable by the very arguments that the. The people who perpetrate them say support them. It's medical malpractice, cruelty to children. It's.

It's terrible. How do you feel about the word mutilate? Do you think that's too far or appropriate?

No, I think it's perfectly appropriate. Even the hormones in the. The. The puberty suppressors cause permanent physical changes to these kids. I don't know why mutilate is a perfectly reasonable.

I don't know why you'd call it anything else.

The DOJ's action comes three months after Bondi warned clinics and hospitals that any suspected cases of female genital mutilation performed on individuals under 18 would be investigated. No charges have been filed as yet, but Trump and his administration are on the case, and I am grateful for it. Meanwhile, in Cal Unicornia, America's most prominent Marxist, purvo, legislator, senator, state Senator Scott Wiener of San Francisco in California has authority bill seeking to protect the various. The very folks, rather, who perform these mutilations and chemical castrations. Quote. California must strongly reject Trump's disgusting efforts to distract from his own incompetent failures by demonizing our transgender neighbors. Oh, that's what he's doing. Yeah. Trying to prevent momentarily confused teenage girls from being mutilated, have their healthy breasts removed because of momentary confusion. Yeah, that's demonizing our transgender neighbors, Scott, you sicko. He goes on to say, the President is attempting to eliminate trans people's very existence in the eyes of the law. And he's made clear he's willing to violate laws and norms to target them. What norms would those be, Scott? Those which were instituted through vicious bullying, like, a couple of years ago, and everybody was too frightened and confused to resist, apparently.

A slight tangent, but I was listening to a podcast yesterday about the psychology around the. Either the Omni cause or the Perma cause, depending on how you look at it, on how, like, a guy got Scott Wiener. He fought so long, so hard for gay marriage, and they won. And the vast majority of people in. In. In all demographics are okay with that. But unless you're gonna close your doors, pack up, and go home after you win something like that, if you want to keep fundraising or whatever, you gotta make up new things. And so they applied the Same amount of. We're on the right side of this. You're on the wrong side. History will be our judge to mutilating children that they did to gay marriage.

The name of transgenderism. It was only a couple years ago that Senator Wiener celebrated the passage of a different bill to erode parents rights by allowing minor children to travel to California for trans procedures, puberty blockers, chemical castration, what they call gender affirming health care and allows non parent adults. Non parent adults to bring children to California for experimental and damaging transgender medical interventions without the knowledge or consent of their parents. That's a law that.

How is that? That's kidnapping. That's crazy.

Yeah, it's absolutely insane. And as Katie Grimes writes in the California Globe, never addressed for the detransitioner warnings and experiences of trauma, regret and often normal issues that confuse teenagers. She mentions a great New York Post in depth report on this important aspect of regret which we've talked about, in which they identified many young people seeking to transition but who are doing so without any proper mental health evaluation. It is monstrous.

So I. I know we've passed a lot of crazy laws, but are you telling me it's a law that if I live in another state, I live in Colorado, and my kid has been convinced by our local public liberal school that they're actually a boy or a girl, the opposite of the sex that they actually are.

They're transgender, Jack.

Right. And my neighbor finds out that I am not doing the surgeries, they could take my kid and. And drive to California and get the surgeries done.

And that would be. Every activist teacher could do it. Sure. Well, California would give zero cooperation. It'd be like a sanctuary state. In fact, that's what they called it. The authorities in California would be legally forbidden for cooperating with you in any way.

That is crazy.

Yeah, it's monstrous. It's actually monstrous. Now I promise you. Demon dem violence. And here's what I was talking about. The fabulous Megyn Kelly was talking to Rahm Emanuel, he of the Obama administration and mayor of Chicago, and a very sharp, fairly moderate Democrat who has his eyes on the prize. And she asked him some questions about gender bending madness. And we're going to compare and contrast his answers with one Gavin Newsom of Cal Unicornia in a moment. But Michael, let's go with the 83 first.

[Michael]

So do you believe boys should be able to play in girls sports?

[Jack Armstrong]

No.

[Michael]

Do you believe that?

[Guest]

Is this the round robin?

[Michael]

Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

We'll do a quick rapid fire and.

[Michael]

Then we can Move past this.

[Jack Armstrong]

Okay.

[Michael]

Do you believe that kids under the age of 18 should be able to be put on puberty blockers and then cross sex hormones?

[Guest]

I think parents have to make that decision themselves. I think that is to a child is too young at 18 to make that decision has to be made with a family. And that choice. I, I think. And before somebody makes a life decision, they have to think twice about that.

[Jack Armstrong]

So he didn't explicitly reject the perverse Scott Wiener Gavin Newsom idea that. No, no, the kid can't decide on their own and get whisked somewhere to do it by an activist teacher, but he made it clear that that's what he thinks. He went on 84B.

[Michael]

Michael, should we be putting men in female prisons? Men claiming they're women?

[Guest]

No.

[Michael]

And all right, here's my last one for you. Can a man become a woman?

[Guest]

Can a man become a woman? Not. No.

[Michael]

Thank you. That's so easy. Why don't more people in your party just say that?

[Guest]

Because I'm now going to go into a witness protection plan.

[Jack Armstrong]

Exactly. And I wish we had time. Maybe we'll get into it next. But Noah Rothman of the National Review wrote a great column about a couple of jokes that have been made lately by Democrat politicians, including that one in which Rahm Emanuel said, yeah, having said, given you those easy, obvious answers, I now got to get into the witness protection program in my own party. Rom stating obviously that this is really dangerous for me in Democrat politics.

Yeah. But I don't know how much people know Rahm Emanuel's act. I've watched it in interviews for many, many years. He's strong enough to stand up to that. He is not a guy that will shrink from that.

No. He's not intimidated by anybody. So should men be in female prisons because they say they're a woman? No. Can a man become a woman? No. Should boys play in girl sports? No. Let's compare that with Gavin. I want the White House so badly I have to rearrange my pants. Newsome talking the other day to Sean Ryan in 85. Michael, what about for your values?

I mean, is, is eight years old too young?

[G]

Yeah. I mean, look, I, I now that I have a nine year old, just became nine. Come on, man, I get it. So those are legit. You know, it's, it's interesting just the issue of age. I haven't as I. And as someone that's been so focused on on equality, broadly LGBT rights, particularly gay marriage, the trans issue for me is also novel. It's over the last few years. I'm trying to understand as much as anyone else whole pronoun thing, trying to understand all of that. What you know, that was like the hell, I mean all that stuff, I get it. This, all this stuff started to collapse on us. I joked with Charlie about Latinx.

[Jack Armstrong]

Rahm Emanuel is going to thrash you, Gavin. Thrash you for several reasons. Number one, I think just innate ability. And secondly, as I've said more than once, Gavin Newsom is a sports team that has never played an actual game. He has just had inter squad scrimmages, intra squad scrimmages. He is in a one party state where he was anointed the chosen one by Nancy Pelosi and his relatives and all many years ago. You've, you've never been in a fist fight, Gavin. All you've done is taken some self defense classes. You are going to get thrash.

I think Rahm Emanuel said at some point, look, the whole trans thing is like one out of 1,000 of 1%. We've got to stop talking about this stuff. But as an indicator to people of where you are, it's huge. Remember the Trump ad that everybody agreed was the best Trump ad was you play Kamala Harris talking about trans stuff and you say Kamala's for she her Trump is for you they them for they them. Trump is for you was huge. And not because of how many trans people come into your life. It's just rk are you a nutjob who's going to play this game or not? And, and, and Gavin can't pick a lane. I mean that was so weak. I've heard that now like five or six times and it's worse every time I hear it.

Oh yeah, it's the number of coherent sentences there is is very, very small. The number of half stated, half truth garbage is very large. Michael, I know we ought to take a break but give me 8182 back to back real quick.

[Guest]

The fact is we can teach kids and we should basically focus on the fundamentals and get back to the fundamentals. I do think as it relates to and I did this as Mayor 2016Ambassador I worked with you got an issue and you're working through on your pronoun, et cetera. I respect that I come from an inclusive kind of culture but it is not the preoccupation for the rest of the class. The rest the preoccupation for the class.

[Michael]

So you want the schools to stop pushing that stuff?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah.

[Guest]

You are spending now. I don't know eight minutes on this. There's 50 million.

[Michael]

That's only because you won't give me a straight answer. We can move on if you give.

[Jack Armstrong]

Me a straight answer.

[Guest]

I'll give you a straight answer. Let me get kids go to public schools to schools in elementary education in America we're talking about 0.01%, right?

[Jack Armstrong]

So why are the teachers unions insisting on teaching this stuff every year to kids as young as 6 years old? It's perverse. Stop it.

Man, it's gonna be fun to watch that primary when it finally happens.

Oh, gender bending madness. Do we gotta play the.

Okay, more on the way.

Stay here. Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

Time for a sofa upgrade. Visit washablesofas.com and discover Annabe where designer style meets budget friendly prices. With sofas starting at $699, Annabe brings you the ultimate in furniture innovation with a modular design that allows you to rearrange your space effortlessly. Perfect for both small and large spaces, Anove is the only machine washable sofa inside and out. Say goodbye to stains and messes with liquid and stain resistant fabrics that make cleaning easy. Liquid simply slides right off. Designed for custom comfort, our high resilience foam lets you choose between a sink in feel or a supportive memory foam blend. Plus our pet friendly stain resistant fabrics ensure your sofa stays beautiful for years. Don't compromise quality for price. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your living space today with no risk returns and a 30 day money back guarantee. Get up to 60% off plus free shipping and free returns. Shop [e-mail] Authors are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Unknown]

The maker of Pop Tarts and Pringles said that they are removing all synthetic dyes from their foods. People who eat pop tarts and Pringles are like good. Because my health is very important to me. I think it's more concerning that they have to dye Pringles the color of.

[Jack Armstrong]

What color are Pringles?

[Unknown]

Were you dying khaki? I don't understand this happen. Things have really changed. I mean now everyone's against artificial dyes. I remember the good old days when people were eating Tide pods. Come on, that was.

[Jack Armstrong]

That's a good question. What color are Pringles? I get that there's probably not a lot of strawberry in a strawberry pop tart, so you need to dye something red to make it look like that. But what color is a Pringle? Who knows?

I mean potatoes are like potato color and Pringles are roughly maybe they're too gray when they come out of the factory. And that's a great place to get your food from a factory. As I finish off a protein bar. That absolutely came from Decent point.

I mean, we shouldn't be taking in stuff that's bad for us when it's completely unnecessary. But if you're eating Pringles and Pop Tarts, you're not super concerned about what you put into your body. I say to myself as a guy who's had Pringles and Pop Tarts fairly recently coming up, you know, the whole 10,000 steps a day was completely made up. I mean, it's just a good round number completely made up. But they have since everybody got into the whole count your steps and your watch app has it and all that sort of stuff. Fitbits, counting your steps. They have figured out what numbers make the difference and at what point beyond that, it doesn't really make any difference. So the. The number you got to every day. We'll get to that a little bit later. That's a good one to know. I'm actually going to put the app back on my watch. I had taken it off because I don't like being yelled at my watch because I sat down too much or whatever.

Yeah, shut up.

Shut up. Watch I bought you. I can take you back too. I can take you back to Best Buy. It's still within the return time.

I like how I haven't worn it for three days and I put it on, it says, joey hadn't reached your goal lately, but you can today. I'm like, dude, according to you, I've been completely motionless for 72 hours. I'm dead. How do you not know that?

Somebody had an interesting text. So the new fertility rate came out and we're at an all time low in the United States and somebody. It seems like we should call it out.

The.

Call it the reproduction rate, not the fertility rate. Because if it's the fertility rate, like, and we were trying but couldn't have babies, that would be a completely different story than the fact that people aren't really trying. They aren't getting together, they aren't mating, they aren't having sex, they aren't being in relationships. And then if, even if you do, you go out of your way to make sure you don't get pregnant. So that's different than fertility rate.

It's a good point.

Yeah, it's the. We don't want to have kids. That's a psychological. Well, maybe it's not. Maybe it. Maybe who knows, Maybe it's the the dyes they put in Pop Tarts or.

Some innate sense we have of whether we ought to reproduce or not. I don't mean in these troubled times with the global warming. No, I'm not talking about that crap. I'm just talking about we look around and just don't feel the need. We're too safe and secure.

How it's not the lead story today. Everywhere, I do not know. Tulsi Gabbard press conference yesterday in the briefing room accusing Barack Obama of some serious crimes. Stay tuned for that Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? WashablesOfAs.com has your back. Featuring the Annabe collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back. Upgrade [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Jack Armstrong]

Was worse than we thought because now we know it did in fact go all the way to the White House. All the way to the President of the United States. That's Jim Jordan, who we've had on the show. I like the guy, but there have been a lot of Republicans that I tend to like. Say some things that have not turned out to be as nailed down as they claimed. Or, you know, they just don't go anywhere for a variety of reasons. If what Tulsi Gabbard said yesterday is true, I think this would be the biggest scandal in U.S. history. That and it's hardly made the news. She's the Director of National Intelligence. She in theory has the ability to look at all of it. Nsa, CIA, FBI, bring it together, figure it out.

Right?

And then she's in the White House press briefing room yesterday and makes all these claims which we're about to claim are about to play for you. And it's not getting a hell of a lot of attention anywhere out of Fox, other than fox. But let's run through all this stuff. There's some entertaining stuff in here too. One at a time, Michael.

Here we go.

[Joe Getty]

The report goes into great detail about the information that Russia and Putin had, which on Hillary Clinton, which included possible criminal acts like secret meetings with multiple named U.S. religious organizations, in which State Department officials offered, in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton's campaign for the presidency, significant increases in financing from the State Department. They also had documents that showed the patronage of the State Department to State Department employees who would go and support Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.

[Jack Armstrong]

I mean, that's a completely new angle that I don't remember hearing before. Tulsi goes on.

[Joe Getty]

There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers.

[Jack Armstrong]

So what is that?

Wait, what?

I know, I know.

Okay, I'm confused. What she's, what's she alleging? That, that, that somebody held that back or.

Well, first of all, that when whoever, because we no longer remember, it was low confidence, we now know that it was Russia that hacked the emails.

But.

So whoever hacked the emails, they did get hacked. There were emails in there that had information about Hillary being played that. Again, just because that list of her mental situation was kind of entertaining.

[Joe Getty]

There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness.

[Jack Armstrong]

There you go.

[Joe Getty]

Uncontrolled cheerfulness.

[Jack Armstrong]

And she was on heavy doses, daily doses of tranquilizer.

But the idea that Hillary would explode in rage, then laugh like she would. I mean, you know, it was mocked by Amy Poehler on Saturday Night Live. It was so weird that she was just. But I don't, I don't think that she was like insane or anything. I think she was just a politician trying to come off as cheerful.

Now, Hillary did claim at one point that Tulsi is a Russian asset. Is this her vengeance?

Oh, boy.

And, and besides, if when the Russians hack emails they don't like, very carefully and professionally make sure that exactly, precisely accurate renderings of the emails are then issued to the public. No, they'll mess with them in an effort to do as much crazy as they can, if indeed it was them.

Behind it, you would be crazy not to. If you don't hack the emails and then write some yourself, that you include, and give them to WikiLeaks or whoever you're not trying. Right, let's roll on then.

[Joe Getty]

CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote, unquote clear preference for Trump.

[Jack Armstrong]

I think that's completely true.

Yeah, I agree completely with that as well.

Go on, Tulsi.

[Joe Getty]

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016. They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching what would be a years long coup against him and his administration. We're here today because the American people deserve the truth. They deserve accountability and they deserve justice. Even the bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report published in 2020 criticized the FBI's handling of the Steele dossier. James Comey and others, including their mouthpieces in the media, knowingly lied as they repeated the contrived narrative that was created in this January 2017 intelligence community assessment.

[Jack Armstrong]

Very briefly, she said, we deserve the truth. And I think that long clip was full of truth. That was good, solid stuff. We deserve accountability. Not gonna get it.

Nope.

And we deserve justice. Not gonna get that either. It all struck me as a very well constructed editorial based on what we now know about how dishonest all those people were. And that's probably where it's going to end. But that was solid.

Yeah, I think it's going to end there too, which is pretty awful. Yeah, well, so here's Ed o', Keefe, who I have dined with. I found him to be both pleasant, cheerful and quite happy with himself. Of CBS News asking Tulsa Tulsi about her proof.

Help us from a 50,000 foot level, explain what do you now have that refutes those two?

[Joe Getty]

Sheriff, I encourage you in my role as the Director of National Intelligence, my job again As I said when I came into this role was to make sure that we are telling the truth to the American people and that we are ensuring that the intelligence community is not being politicized. So I'm not asking you to take my word for it. I'm asking you and the media to conduct honest journalism and the American people to see for yourself. In the documents that we've released now, close to 200 pages that point in multiple references, multiple examples to include comments that have been made by senior intelligence professionals who are some still working within these agencies today that confirm the conclusions that we have drawn that President Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a years long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency.

[Jack Armstrong]

And it's your belief that those two previous investigations missed that or covered it up?

[Joe Getty]

I'm telling you to look at the evidence. Look at the evidence and you will know the truth.

[Jack Armstrong]

So we talked about it yesterday when we were reading from the transcripts and everything like that. So even without the Obama stuff, which I'm sure the media would really not want to, you know, have to dig into, even without the Obama stuff, did you hear anybody report, other than Fox and shows like ours, the fact that CIA and FBI had very low confidence that that narrative that Russia was trying to help Trump win was true? Very low confidence from the CIA and the FBI. Have you heard anybody report that at all? That seems to be irrefutable unless you're going to claim that those documents are made up. But I haven't heard anybody claim that.

They just don't know. Specific quotes from high level people saying this is ridiculous, we can't include this, this goes against all of our standards. Yeah, that is known.

Well, have you heard anybody reported other than Fox and again, shows like ours?

No, not really. No. No.

So they're not. See, that's the new era that we're in. You don't have to like come up with a rebuttal or, or, or, or, or even make something up to push back on something. If it's a story you don't like, you just don't cover it and it disappears because our new, our media is so fragmented and everything moves so fast and our attention span is so short.

Just ignore it. I, I read a piece by Holman Jenkins in, in the Wall Street Journal and it's, I was trying to figure out how to distill it and bring it to you. It's, it's honestly a little bit confusing. The bottom line is that Comey and Brennan and Clapper and Obama got baited by the Russians over and over again and, and their various hack. Their various hacks and, and, and mouthpieces and stuff like that. And they kept being jerked around by, by false intelligence and by planted Russian crap intended to confuse them and that a lot of this was a cover up of their incompetence. But again, that part, how he makes that case is it's really complicated and it'll make your head hurt. So I'll just skip to this part.

Are you saying that. So that the Russians goal was to like trick the Obama administration into thinking all this bad stuff was happening?

Kind of.

And then again suit which would be. I mean that's a hell of a good plan.

Well, and, and again I, I'm resisting getting into this because it's complicated and it's impossible to summarize. Comey got got duped into reopening the Clinton email thing by some false Russian propaganda that claimed to be signal interceptions from high level Obama administration people. It was fake, but he thought this will get out and make all of us look bad. So I've got to cover our traps tracks by making a big deal of the Hillary thing, blah blah, blah. And that led into ways in which Jenkins explains the whole, the whole Russian collusion thing because they were trying to cover up their incredible incompetence in the Hillary email thing and in one other matter. But trust me when I say this is the really interesting part.

Do you remember when Hillary coughed up that thing that was kind of green white color.

Thus was born the mess that explains all that follows. I further stipulate that Messrs. Comey, Clapper. It was a cover up. Mr. Comey's first untoward decision spawned a second. Reopening the Hillary probe shortly before election day, which Mrs. Clinton and independent pollsters say elected Mr. Trump. Imagine if the subject in 2016's wake hadn't been Mr. Trump's imaginary Russia ties, but the real incompetence of US officials in tilting the election of Mr. Trump based on false Russian intelligence danglings. In other words, Comey and Clapper and Brennan got duped into believing some Russian fake intelligence that impugned Hillary. What was that a week before the election?

It was real close.

Yeah, or real close to the election. And tipped the election in the favor of Hillary. And that was known. So they had to cloud the water with new scary intelligence all about how Trump's an evildoer which completely eclipsed their role in screwing Hillary and getting Trump elected.

That reminds me. That's the summary that reminds me a little like the COVID thing. The Fauci crowd got caught making up horrible viruses in a sloppy lab, so they had to go hardcore. A completely different direction and different story.

Great comparison. Yeah, really good. I haven't even gotten to the my favorite part of this, the part that made me say, oh my God, when Hillary have to be after the break.

When Hillary coughed up that weird thing.

Here he goes again. Quick word from our friends at Trust and Will get security and peace of mind by making an Estate plan Now Create and manage a custom estate plan. You know you need to do this for the people you care about. Starting at just 199 bucks. So much less expensive than a whole team of attorneys would cost you.

Step by step process. You log on, you start filling in names and all this different sort of stuff. Live customer support through chat, phone or email to help you along. It matches up with your state laws wherever you live.

You can do this and you can have all of your important documents in one place with bank level encryption. Live Customer support again. Secure your assets, Protect your loved ones with trust and will get 20% off on your estate plan documents by visiting Trust and Will. Will comm/armstrong. That's trust and will.comarmstrong if you kick off without your plans being known specifically, you are dooming your loved ones to a hellish wrestling match. Don't do that. Trust and will.comarmstrong so you're telling me.

After all this extraordinary stuff we have, you've got the best thing to come?

It's pretty amazing when you think about it, yes.

Okay, so that's on the way.

Next, Armstrong and Gettysburg.

[Joe Getty]

Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? WashablesOfAs.com has your back. Featuring the Annabe collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right. Sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping or restocking fees. Every Penny back Upgrade [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Jack Armstrong]

It seems to me that the DNI claiming a former president committed treason is a big enough story to report on, even if you think it's not true. Political playbook today doesn't mention it.

That's insane.

I know.

So as I mentioned earlier, Holman Jenkins Jr. Of the Wall Street Journal is writing this piece about how some Russian intelligence came up with a couple of memos in Russian that seemed to rely on intercepted US Communications and made it clear that the Obama administration was trying to kill the Clinton email investigation. Comey knew it was false, but thought it represented a counterintelligence matter that they had to deal with. And so they, in order to avoid the perception that was the case, they overcorrected any like went big on the Hillary email thing right before the election and probably tipped it toward Trump. And Jenkins believes that a lot of what followed was a cover up of that screw up. So just jumping ahead now, here's the really interesting part. Then there's a part nobody wants to think about. Vladimir Putin was watching. First US officials used bogus Russian intelligence to try to assure Mrs. Clinton's victory. With Mr. Trump's surprise win. New bogus intelligence has rolled out to suggest Mr. Trump was was in treasonous cahoots with Russia. Mr. Putin knows it's all nonsense and he knows his US counterparts know it. Oh, then the 2020 election comes along and 51 top figures in US intelligence people Mr. Putin might have dealt with personally concoct a story that a laptop of embarrassing and incriminating information about Joe Biden's son is a Russian intelligence plant. Putin knows they're lying and he knows. Wow. When weighing, excuse me, when weighing the probabilities of his Ukraine grab, what did Mr. Putin make of the feckless and self abasing and frankly, Maxwell smartish acts of US intelligence leaders in its anything goes battle with Mr. Trump. These events filled the six years before 2-24-22, when Mr. Putin was mulling the most important bet of his career. The US response to his Ukraine move in turn would affect how the Ukrainians themselves responded. Resist or cut a deal. The Biden administration's first impulse, remember, was to urge the Zelinsky government to flee. When CIA chief Burns of Biden administration visited Moscow in 21 to warn the Russians off invading, did he also breed the CIA's conclusion that a Russian invention invasion would be successful? That whole bit about Putin knew we were lying and Putin knew That we knew he knew we were lying, and he had to think, the US Is falling apart. They're utterly ineffective. They're so tied up in, well, Trump derangement syndrome, they're completely debasing themselves in the very thing they do for a living.

Yeah. That had to be something for him when that whole this has all the earmarks of Russian disinformation about the laptop. And he was like, you know that that's not true.

Right.

And which they did, by the way.

Oh, yeah. Yeah. And he had to think, this country is completely screwed up.

He's pretty close to right there.

I don't think they have the will to stand up to me.

Yeah, that is. That is a hell of a thing. There is not going to be the ending to this story that I would like.

No. As Jenkins says, unfortunately, there's more to learn. And we probably won't.

Yep. Not for a long, long time. Decades from now, maybe. As is often the case with these kind of things.

Yeah. Wow. Spooks plus politics equals trouble.

Yeah. So we do four hours of radio every single day. You probably can't listen to the whole.

Too much I'm being held against my will.

Unless you're strapped to a bed or something. You probably can't hear the whole thing when you get yourself unstrapped somehow. Dial up the podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand. You can listen to any segment you want to.

Yep. Subscribe to it. It's sincere advice to you. Good. Hour four, by the way. A lot of good stuff I can't wait to get to, including Is AI killing Google or not? A bunch of tech stories. Hope you can hang around. Or grab the podcast Armstrong and Gettysburg. This is an I heart podcast.