Feed Them To The Dogs

Summary

Armstrong & Getty On Demand: Episode "Feed Them To The Dogs" Summary

Release Date: December 3, 2024
Host: Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty
Description: The official, On-Demand podcast of The Armstrong & Getty Show! Accept no substitutes!

---

1. Introduction to Hunter Biden's Pardon [01:25 - 05:38]

The episode opens with Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty delving into the contentious topic of President Joe Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter Biden. They dissect the specifics and broader implications of the pardon, questioning its timing and scope.

• Joe Getty Critiques the Pardon Duration: "A few years, five years, 10 years. It needs to be 11." ([01:28])

• Jack Armstrong Questions the Legality: "This is not where he got convicted and sentenced to five years. I'm commuting his sentence because he's my boy." ([03:03])

The hosts argue that the 11-year blanket pardon undermines the integrity of the Justice Department and sets a dangerous precedent for political interference in legal matters.

• Joe Getty on Judicial Rejection: "Six judges... have all rejected that after looking at it." ([05:40])

They emphasize the lack of transparency and potential for abuse, comparing the pardon to historical examples where pardons were used to shield individuals from prosecution without due process.

---

2. South Korea's Declaration of Martial Law [16:58 - 25:09]

Armstrong and Getty shift focus to an international crisis as South Korea declares martial law for the first time in four decades. They examine the domestic unrest and political maneuvers that led to this drastic measure.

• Joe Getty Describes the Chaos: "It looks like they settled on deploying troops to prevent lawmakers from entering the National Assembly." ([17:56])

• Jack Armstrong Draws Parallels to January 6th: "It has a very January 6th look to it." ([19:26])

The hosts discuss the implications for South Korea's democracy, questioning whether the military and police will uphold the new regulations or defy the president's orders, as seen in historical contexts like Tiananmen Square and Yeltsin's Russia.

• Joe Getty on Potential Outcomes: "Members of law enforcement... are blocking politicians from getting back into the National Assembly." ([17:56])

They speculate on the future actions of President Yoon and the resilience of South Korea's democratic institutions in the face of political instability.

---

3. US Foreign Policy and Global Implications [26:13 - 31:28]

The conversation transitions to broader foreign policy issues, focusing on the United States' strained relations with China and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East.

• Joe Getty on US-China Relations: "There’s economic warfare going on... inevitable between the United States and China." ([26:13])

• Jack Armstrong on Middle East Dynamics: "Trump has made his support for Israel and against Iran unmistakably clear." ([27:12])

The hosts analyze recent sanctions imposed by the Biden administration on China, highlighting the escalating tensions and potential for economic and military confrontations. They also discuss the complexities of Middle Eastern politics, referencing Trump's policies versus current administration approaches.

• Joe Getty Highlights Strategic Failures: "Bob Woodward... Hamas invaded. And MBS still wants to do it." ([30:38])

The dialogue underscores the challenges in achieving diplomatic resolutions and the impacts of leadership decisions on international stability.

---

4. Kamala Harris Campaign Critique [33:12 - 42:50]

Armstrong and Getty critique Kamala Harris's recent campaign missteps, focusing on a controversial video released by the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

• Joe Getty on DNC's Video Release: "She sounds like a drunk, crazy person... Why did they put that out?" ([34:16])

• Jack Armstrong on Rhetoric Failure: "What was the point of that greeting card rhetoric strung together poorly?" ([40:34])

They argue that the DNC's decision to broadcast a flawed segment of Harris's private conversation undermines her campaign and reflects strategic mismanagement. The hosts speculate on the intentions behind the video release and its effects on voter perception.

• Joe Getty on Internal Campaign Struggles: "We were doing interviews constantly, but somehow the narrative took hold that she wouldn't answer questions." ([38:28])

The hosts express frustration over the perceived lack of support and ineffective communication strategies employed by Harris's team, questioning the overall direction of the Democratic campaigns.

---

5. Conclusion and Final Insights [43:30 - 44:25]

As the episode nears its end, Armstrong and Getty reflect on the discussed topics, emphasizing the recurring themes of political manipulation, erosion of democratic norms, and the consequences of leadership decisions.

• Joe Getty on Legacy and Accountability: "This has gotten and will continue to get quadrupled the scrutiny of just commuting the sentences." ([06:09])

• Jack Armstrong on Institutional Resilience: "This is a real test of the institutions of that particular democracy." ([24:39])

The hosts conclude by urging listeners to remain vigilant and informed, underscoring the importance of holding leaders accountable to preserve democratic integrity and prevent the abuse of power.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Joe Getty: "Hunter, I'll give you a pardon. A few years, five years, 10 years. It needs to be 11." ([01:28])

• Jack Armstrong: "It's a sort of blanket license for lawlessness." ([03:49])

• Joe Getty: "We're not allowing Palestinians into this country. That would be a disaster." ([31:28])

• Jack Armstrong: "She's either incompetent or shameless or just being put in an impossible position." ([12:37])

• Joe Getty: "Seal all the charges against Hunter Biden, slam the door on any future indictments." ([08:05])

• Jack Armstrong: "You can't be angry at Clinton for the Mark Rich thing. You can't be angry at Trump for Gerald Kushner's dad." ([06:11])

---

Key Themes and Insights

1. Political Patronage and Legal Immunity: The episode critically examines the implications of presidential pardons used for personal associates, highlighting concerns over legal integrity and potential abuse of executive power.

2. Democratic Stability and Military Intervention: South Korea's declaration of martial law serves as a case study for the fragility of democratic institutions and the risks of military involvement in civilian politics.

3. US Foreign Policy Tensions: The discussion underscores escalating conflicts with China and complexities in Middle Eastern relations, emphasizing the strategic challenges faced by US leadership.

4. Campaign Mismanagement: The critique of Kamala Harris's campaign strategies reflects broader concerns about effective leadership, communication, and internal party dynamics within the Democratic Party.

5. Institutional Accountability: Throughout the episode, Armstrong and Getty advocate for robust institutional checks and balances to prevent the erosion of democratic norms and ensure leaders remain accountable.

---

Conclusion

In "Feed Them To The Dogs," Armstrong and Getty provide a robust critique of contemporary political maneuvers both within the United States and internationally. They shed light on the potential dangers of unchecked executive power, the importance of maintaining democratic integrity, and the need for strategic foresight in foreign policy. Their analysis encourages listeners to critically evaluate leadership decisions and advocate for transparency and accountability in governance.

Transcript

[Jay Shetty]

Hey, it's Jay Shetty with On Purpose. My newest episode is out now with Jordan Peterson. To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from. Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Trust me, you won't want to miss this one.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

It's hard to read the news these days without asking yourself, how did we get here? Fiasco is a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which resulted in a high stakes stalemate, ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Jack Armstrong]

Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now he Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

The pardon sweeping covering offenses that Hunter.

[Jack Armstrong]

Biden, quote, has committed or may have committed or taken pardon over the past 11 years.

[Joe Getty]

11 years is a very specific and not rounded amount of time. So, Hunter, I'll give you a pardon. A few years, five years, 10 years. It needs to be 11. And if you would be so kind, make sure this upcoming New Year's Eve is also covered. Going to get crazy. I didn't know pardons could cover crimes you may have committed. I'm surprised Biden didn't include the phrase on earth one or any of the earth in the multiverse. Yeah, Jon Stewart had a lot of fun with the Hunter Biden pardon last night, pointing out that, yes, 11 years is very specific. Uh, why not 12? Why not 10? There must be some reason you chose 11. Uh, and all the speculation that goes with that, and then just the damage it did to all those candidates that were out there for the entire election year saying, look at the difference between Republicans and Democrats. We let the Justice Department do its job and then live with the results. The Republican Party fights, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right.

[Joe Getty]

And Trump claims it's all a politics. And then, and then Joe Biden specifically puts out a statement saying the Justice Department is infected with politics and unfair. Oh, okay.

[Jack Armstrong]

Which happens to be in the case of Hunter Biden, the opposite of the truth, in which he was cut probably felonious sweetheart deals by a fixed Justice Department, but he found the gumption to claim otherwise. This is outrageous in half a dozen different ways. The idea that a dad let his son off the hook for crimes, I mean, everybody gets that. And it may be wrong and you might condemn it, but that's not where the focus needs to be. The focus, in my opinion, needs to be on the utterly insane 11 year period where anything you did during that period, you'll never be prosecuted for. It's not like he got convicted and sentenced to five years. I'm commuting his sentence. Cause he's my boy. No, this is a sort of blanket license for lawlessness. Backward.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. The Dispatch had a good piece on that today. Some legal observers have pointed out that Joe Biden could have structured the pardon in a way that didn't undermine the credibility of the Justice Department, but preempted targeting by the Trump administration. Because Biden is claiming that, well, when Trump gets into office, he's going to spend all his time trying to get Hunter Biden. Biden could have simply issued a pardon on any uncharged crimes, but let the tax and gun conviction stand, for instance, so that Trump couldn't have tried to find other stuff but said, you know, my son did these things and so he's gonna pay the price. Or he could have commuted the future sentencing decisions in the two cases he was convicted in, just commuted those and left it alone from that. Instead, the President opted for a broad pardon and justified it by claiming political bias by federal prosecutors. Well, that's David Weiss, who, if you've been following this whole saga, you remember him, he's the special counsel. Well, he isn't taking this allegation sitting down, writes the Dispatch, because Joe Biden basically called him out and said he's corre over the weekend. So Weiss, his office filed a motion on Sunday in the tax case requesting that the judge close the docket on the case instead of simply dismissing it, which would preserve the record of the indictment just so it continues to be there as opposed to going away. Prosecutors included a thinly veiled rebuttal to Biden's claims. There was none and never has been any evidence of vindictive or selective prosecution in the case. Weiss goes on to say, in total, 11 different federal judges appointed by six different presidents, including Hunter's father, considered and rejected the defendant's claims, including his claims for selective and vindictive prosecution. Wow, that's the Justice Department saying, oh, no, don't go claiming we're corrupt, you effing liar.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, yeah.

[Joe Getty]

Six judges, all those judges appointed by six different presidents on the specific complaint of we're politicizing this, have all rejected that after looking at it. But you, Joe Biden, have found something somewhere that none of those judges saw.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's ridiculous. And maybe the senile POTUS cooked all of this up. I, I smell the unholy lavender perfume of fake Dr. Jill in all of this. A poitway, right.

[Joe Getty]

Yes, we can in that.

[Jack Armstrong]

If Biden had merely said, look, he's my son and I love him, he screwed up while he was on drugs, he's paid back his taxes, I'm commuting his sentences, people would be angry and saying, this is. You can't be angry at Clinton for the Mark Rich thing. You can't be angry at Trump for Gerald Kushner's dad. You can't be mad at any of these presidents and then put up with this. We don't like this. You better be careful, presidents, or there's gonna be a price to pay. Okay, that would have been fine, but it went so far beyond that. Not only the blanket pardon for all sins that maybe were committed that we don't know about, which is, I mean, that's like beyond what ford gave Nixon 50 years ago. It's, it's crazy. But the indictment of his own Justice Department in the defiance of those 11 federal judges of all facts of the sweetheart deal Weiss cooked up, that got tossed out by that good judge in D.C. why would you do all that? It's, it's horrible. This has gotten and will continue to get quadrupled the scrutiny of just commuting the sentences for the tax and gun crimes. The answer why you would do some of it is because you're on a money laundering outfit and have for decades. Bingo.

[Joe Getty]

That's got a bit of an Occam's Razor to it. Or if that, you know, whatever's the most likely is usually the right answer. Here's an interesting angle from Senator Joe Manchin, Democrat.

[Jay Shetty]

As a father, I don't know the father that wouldn't have done the same thing what I would have done differently. My recommendation as a counselor would have.

[Joe Getty]

Been, why don't you go ahead and.

[Jay Shetty]

Pardon Donald Trump for all his charges.

[Joe Getty]

And make it, you know, it had.

[Jack Armstrong]

Been gone down a lot, a lot more balanced, if you will.

[Joe Getty]

I'm just saying wipe them out.

[Jack Armstrong]

What do you think this does for his legacy?

[Jay Shetty]

I don't know from that standpoint, it makes it difficult.

[Joe Getty]

Decent point from Joe Manchin. If you're believing that things got too political in our justice system during a hot presidential election, yeah, pardon Hunter, pardon Trump. Let's all just move forward and claim we're going to do better in the future, though we won't.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I don't want to get off on this tangent, but it is what he did and the way he did it was unnecessarily politically just terrible.

[Joe Getty]

David Axelrod, smart David Axelrod on CNN this morning said it was handled very poorly. There's all kinds of different options. You could do the thing you were talking about, about pardoning Hunter as a dad and everything like that. But I realize not everybody has these connections. And that's why I'm launching the Come up with an acronym that is all about helping drug addicts get back on their feet. Some program that's never going to do anything. But you say that sort of, you.

[Jack Armstrong]

Know, yeah, yeah, you'd promote legislation, it.

[Joe Getty]

Wouldn'T even get a hearing.

[Jack Armstrong]

But it doesn't matter for how troops in the field and drug addicts and whomever else gets a second chance or tax counseling or something. But they didn't even try, which is just either a sign of he doesn't give a crap or, well, it's probably that, hey, let's do this for me. Do this for me on January 20th. It's the 20th, right?

[Joe Getty]

Yep.

[Jack Armstrong]

TRUMP gets inaugurated, we are going to lose the pleasure, the joy of listening to one Karine Jean Pierre vomit up some of the most ridiculous word salads I've heard in my history of watching this stuff. I mean, she is, A, being asked to defend the indefensible, which is frequently the job of the press secretary. But B, she's uniquely terrible at it. And she was confronted with the absolute undeniable dishonesty and hypocrisy of the whole Hunter pardon thing by reporters who are fairly aggressive and 35. Michael is just, this is like her encore song on her farewell tour. This will be remembered.

[Joe Getty]

You have said repeatedly yourself since the election. The president has said for months no pardon was coming. I just, I wanted to ask you, could those statements now be seen as live lies from the American people? Is there really a credibility issue here.

[Jack Armstrong]

Given now this announcement?

[Karine Jean-Pierre]

First of all, one of the things that the president always believes is to be truthful to the American people. That is something that he always truly believes. And if you see the end of his, I assume that you've read his statement and you look at the end of that statement and he actually says that in the first line in the last paragraph and respects the thinking and how the American people will actually see this in his decision making. And I would encourage everyone to read in full the President's statement. I think he lays out his thought process. He lays out how he came to this decision. He came to this decision this weekend. So let's be very clear about that. He says it himself. It's in his voice. He said he came to this decision this weekend and he said he wrestled with this and because he believes in the justice Simpson. But he also believes that the war politics infected the process and led to a miscarriage of justice.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, that's my favorite part, is how those last two sentences don't go together. I believe in the justice system, but I believe it was infected with politics. So I don't believe in the justice system. Let's.

[Jack Armstrong]

Let's hear the follow up.

[Joe Getty]

Michael, does the president believe now and agree with President Elect Trump that the justice system has been weaponized for political.

[Jack Armstrong]

Purposes and that it needs root and branch reform?

[Karine Jean-Pierre]

No. Read the president's statement. Seriously, read the president's statement. He said he believes in the Department of Justice. He does. He also believes that rural politics infected the process and it led to a miscarriage of justice. He believes his son was unfairly targeted. He said that what his political opponents have done to my son, that's his words, is cruel and enough is enough.

[Joe Getty]

I believe in marriage and the sanctity of marriage. I would never cheat on my wife. You're kissing her right now. I would never cheat on my wife. Why are you kissing her? Hold up your hands while you're saying this.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. She is either incompetent or shameless or just being put in an impossible position.

[Joe Getty]

That actually made my brain hurt. The dissonance made my brain hurt. Is that is.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

Does. Does she know I just said two sentences that are 180 degrees opposite each other?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes, I just, I just contradicted myself, like back to back words. So I understand the power that the press secretary has and how if you have an ongoing relationship with them, you've got to be at least a little diplomatic as a reporter. But why don't Moore say you didn't come within a mile of answering my question or you just said two things that are directly contradictory in the same paragraph. Sort them out for me, please.

[Joe Getty]

He believes in the justice. Justice system. He doesn't believe in the justice system. Those are the.

[Jack Armstrong]

Do you believe the justice system has been politicized. No, absolutely not. But politics perverted the justice system.

[Joe Getty]

Wow.

[Jack Armstrong]

All right. You're wasting my time and yours, sweetheart. I can't wait till you're gone. No. Shut up. I'm sick of you. I don't care if I get access. Your mummified presidency is over. You've been lying in my face for two years now, Gooby.

[Joe Getty]

Somebody get her up. Say somebody get her a parachute. We're gonna toss her out of here DB Cooper style. Which reminds me, they may have figured out who D.B. cooper was. Did you follow that story while we were on breakfast? Very exciting.

[Jack Armstrong]

I saw a headline.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, yeah, that's a good one. They might actually have figured it out. I mean, seriously, I'm just not sure I care anymore. Oh, and some other stuff that we have to get to stay here.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty. If you're a maintenance supervisor for a.

[Joe Getty]

Commercial property, you've had to deal with.

[Jack Armstrong]

Everything from leaky faucets to flickering light bulbs.

[Joe Getty]

But nothing's worse than that ancient boiler.

[Jack Armstrong]

That'S lived in the building since the.

[Joe Getty]

Day it was built 50 years ago.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's enough to make anyone lose their cool.

[Joe Getty]

That's where Grainger comes in.

[Jack Armstrong]

With industrial grade products and dependable, fast.

[Joe Getty]

Delivery, Grainger can help with any challenge, from worn out components to everyday necessities.

[Jack Armstrong]

Call clickgrainger.com or just stop by Grainger.

[Joe Getty]

For the ones who get it done.

[Jay Shetty]

My latest episode is with Jordan Peterson. To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to let go of? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from one of the.

[Joe Getty]

Most articulate men of our time, clinical psychologist turned culture warrior, Dr. Jordan Peterson.

[Jay Shetty]

The men who prefer short term mating opportunities are psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian and sadistic. So one of the unintended consequences of the sexual revolution is that the freed up women have been delivered to the psychopathic men. Most people who have post traumatic stress disorder don't have it because they were hurt. They have it because they encountered someone who wanted to hurt them. Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

In the aftermath of a transformative election like the one we just had, it's hard to read the news without asking yourself every five seconds, how did we get here. That's, that's exactly what we're always trying to figure out on Fiasco, a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which came down to a recount in Florida and ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. In many ways, it's the beginning of the story we're living through right now. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore and find out how a statistical tie in the Florida vote count put the nation into an unprecedented holding pattern during which American voters waited with bated breath to find out whether Al Gore or George W. Bush would be the next President of the United States. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Joe Getty]

So there's craziness going on in South Korea right now. Like I'm looking at the tv. South Korean troops descend on parliament as opposition politicians. So the president declared martial law, et cetera, et cetera. This has all been happening in the last couple of hours. Let's get a quick report from CNN and then a little more for you. This is essentially the first martial law in something like 40 years in South Korea. They have enjoyed a peaceful transfer of power despite increasingly divided politics that have been plaguing Seoul. The President Yoon, his approval rating has.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

Been absolutely abysma as the reason for this martial law. His opponents believe that what he's really.

[Joe Getty]

Trying to do is to try to push through his agenda, including getting a budget passed he feels is impossible with his opposition in control in parliament right now. So by enacting martial law, essentially banning.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

Political activity, taking control of the media.

[Joe Getty]

Banning people from gathering in protest, I mean, all of these things are now essentially illegal under martial law. So in one report. So this sounds like the President's gone out of his mind, doesn't it? So this, this report, I see our friend Mike Lyons is up on CNN talking about it and some of the video, it looks crazy around the parliament building. I mean South Korea is a real country. It's not like some, you know, central South America nut job country. South Korea is a real country and, and they got nutty stuff happening there right now. But here's one report we're enroute to the national assembly now. We've confirmed members of law enforcement at the behest of the president are blocking politicians from getting back into the National Assembly. Lawmakers want to get back there and undo the declaration of martial law. So the lawmakers are trying to get back into parliament to vote and saying no. Apparently they've got enough division of power the same way we do that they could say, no, you don't get to have martial law. But the president has got the cops keeping them from getting back in, so they can't do it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. Wow. This is the first declaration of martial law since they ended their military dictatorship in the late 80s.

[Joe Getty]

But this is the sort of stuff that, like Trump derangement syndrome, people think Trump will do. Right. I mean, where you would have the military or the cops stopping Congress from being able to do something that couldn't. That would not happen in our country.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right.

[Joe Getty]

But I mean, it look, it's got a very January 6th look to it. I'm watching it on television right now. Pretty violent pushing, shoving, trying to get the doors open. Trying to get the doors closed, depending on whether you're the. I don't know if those are cops or military, all of them, but people are pouring in. I don't know if they're all politicians or just human beings, but yeah, it's quite a mess.

[Jack Armstrong]

So the head of the president's own party said in a Facebook post that the president's martial law declaration is wrong and he would work with his citizens to stop it.

[Joe Getty]

Hey, we got another great clip about this. Maybe we'll get to. When we come back from the commercials. This is kind of exciting to watch. A fully mature economy, Western civilization sort of place fall apart.

[Jack Armstrong]

And one of our allies.

[Joe Getty]

And one of our allies. Right.

[Jack Armstrong]

Kind of fun, you say, sir.

[Joe Getty]

Old fathead in North Korea has got to be watching this and thinking.

[Jack Armstrong]

Or thinking you're doing it all wrong. No, no, no. Shoot everybody and the press. Exactly. You shoot a couple editors, you fire.

[Joe Getty]

Them out of cannons. What are you. What are you doing here?

[Jack Armstrong]

Feed them to dogs, you punks.

[Joe Getty]

Feed them to dogs. Oh, my God. We've got more on the way. Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

My latest episode is with Jordan Peterson. To be open to learning does mean at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to let go of? What do I have to transform? That can be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from one of the.

[Joe Getty]

Most articulate men of our time. Clinical psychologist turned culture warrior, Dr. Jordan Peterson.

[Jay Shetty]

The men who prefer short term mating opportunities are psychopathic, narcissistic, machiavellian and sadistic. So one of the unintended consequences of the sexual revolution is that the freed up women have been delivered to the psychopathic men. Most people who have post traumatic stress disorder don't have it because they were hurt. They have it because they encountered someone who wanted to hurt them. Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

In the aftermath of a transformative election like the one we just had, it's hard to read the news without asking yourself every five seconds, how did we get here? That's, that's exactly what we're always trying to figure out on Fiasco, a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which came down to a recount in Florida and ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. In many ways, it's the beginning of the story we're living through right now. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore and find out how a statistical tie in the Florida vote count put the nation into an unprecedented holding pattern during which American voters waited with bated breath to find out whether Al Gore or George W. Bush would be the next president of the United States. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Joe Getty]

There are police officers on the phone who are wondering what is going on, who are calling their captains. You can overhear them in Koreans saying, what are, what is happening right now? There are people who are leaving bars.

[Jay Shetty]

Who are leaving restaurants, calling their moms.

[Joe Getty]

Calling their dads, calling their children, saying, I'm coming home right now. This has not happened within the 21st century. A declaration of military, of martial law. Something that remains in memories of people from the 1980s when South Korea was still under a military dictatorship. Yeah, well, South Korea has gone nuts again, at least for today. So the president of South Korea declared martial law, law, it looks like, to keep his version of Congress parliament from counterbalancing any some of the things that he wants to do. So he declared martial law so they couldn't get back in and vote on various things. Well, one thing they want to do, they wanted to do is get back in and vote. No, we're not going to have martial law. Because he just, as you just heard from those reports there, everybody in, you know, in Seoul is like, what the hell's going on. I mean, this is really weird. I mean, I can't leave the school. I can't leave my place of work. The police don't know what they're supposed to be doing. Well, enough of the parliament got back in to the building and we were watching it on TV live. I mean it had a January 6th look to it. I mean they were fighting through cops who were probably conflicted as to whether or not they should have been following the President's orders or not, trying to get back into the building. But enough of them got back into the building. And the South Korean national assembly has decisively rejected the martial law declaration with 190 of the 300 lawmakers voting in favor of the motion to block it. By law, President Yoon must comply. And it's most likely believed that an impeachment procedure will begin immediately.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. Wow. Well, this is a real test of the institutions of that particular democracy. Obviously the next 24 hours ago is going. Or so rather is going to be really telling. Do they convene the impeachment boat? Do the police and military, you know.

[Joe Getty]

Well, it's.

[Jack Armstrong]

Accept the wishes of the legislature?

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, it's, it's, it's classic. Has been this way through all through history. Are the cops in the military going to follow the president or not or.

[Jack Armstrong]

The law or the law?

[Joe Getty]

And that's the way it always goes. And you know, going back to Christmas Day 91 is that when it was when Yeltsin was staying on the tank, the military said, nah, we ain't going to do it. We ain't firing on all these people. We ain't doing right. And then it's over. Yeah, that direction or sometimes it goes the other way. See Tiananmen Square, 1989. The military does fire on all the people and the little rebellion's over.

[Jack Armstrong]

Tell you what, to pull back the camera a little bit and get a broader view, folks. One of our most important allies, modern democracy is having a near coup and never has any babies anymore and is demographically disappearing. China's on the warpath, has similar demographic problems. Even their allies now are starting to get pissed off about Jack. This will gratify you. Cheap Chinese crap getting dumped into their markets and putting their manufacturers out of business. Man, there is instability in the air.

[Joe Getty]

And something I was reading I'm not smart enough to completely understand, but we just. The Biden administration just announced some new sanctions that's going to really make it difficult for China to get the best computer chips or make the best computer chips and Then so they blasted back with some tariff or ban or something on dual use, things that could be used for military purposes that you can, if you want to claim anything. So there's that level of economic warfare going on which is just the burbling under the surface of the real warfare that is practically inevitable. Inevitable between the United States and China. But Trump is going to over the next four years as he heads into his 80s, he's obviously inheriting the whole Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, really Israel, Iran thing, and then the Russia, Ukraine thing and then China does is not all that stuff is going to play out during his first term. It ain't going to be easy, no.

[Jack Armstrong]

Although it's remarkable the extent to which already the winds have shifted in the Middle east as Trump has made his support for Israel and against Iran just.

[Joe Getty]

Unmistakably clear on that front. I just came across this tweet from Mark Penn, who, if you're not super into politics and you shouldn't be, you don't know this name, but he was an advisor to the Clintons back in the day and would go on all the Sunday shows. Hardcore Democrat, but he tweeted out, Joe mentioned this earlier. Trump basically said, hey, give back the hostages or we're going to hit you so hard, like hitter you harder than you've ever been hit before. That sort of thing. Mark Penn, the Democrat, the Clintonite, said, wow, finally a president who, in response to Hamas propaganda, threatens Hamas instead of Israel, that they better release the hostages or face the consequences. The world has been stuck for over a year waiting for this simple, forceful, moral clarity. This is why Iran returned its hostages when Reagan took office after thumbing its nose at Carter. And why ISIS lost its caliphate under Trump while surging in power and territory under Obama.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. I've got to admit, and I'm not proud of this, I guess it's very hard to resist as a human being, but you get used to a certain modus operandi and it stops and you lose your sense of how dumb and bad it is just because it's always there. The Joe Biden foreign policy. And we have said, why is he not threatening to escalate against Hamas instead of continually saying, well, we don't want to escalate. Where the hell was. Give us our hostages back or we're going to liquidate you. Where was that? When. When Trump says it, you realize, oh, that's right, that's worth the greatest superpower on earth. Why are we tiptoeing around afraid of hur people's feelings? Oh, it's disgusting.

[Joe Getty]

So I'm almost finished with that Bob Woodward book that nobody read but one of the more interesting things that came out of it and I've found it highly enjoyable because I love this stuff that the TikTok reporting on how everything played out with the Hamas October 7th the response same with Ukraine and everything. Just great. The Bob Woodward books, he calls them the first draft of history. And then later people will use his reporting to add to it and write the history books about these major events. But just weeks before Hamas invaded Israel, MBS in Saudi Arabia was ready to do a deal with Israel, fully normalizing relations which would have included the United States will protect Saudi Arabia if they're ever attacked or Israel if they're ever attacked and Vice and both of those countries. So Israel would have come to Saudi Arabia's defense and Saudi Arabia would have come to Israel's defense if Iran ever attacked. And they were ready to do that deal when Hamas invaded. And then MBS still wanted to do it, still wants to do it this day because he thinks it's the best. He's worried about Iran. He thinks the best thing for his country is to be normalized with Israel and be under the umbrella of the United States protection. Who wouldn't want that? But his street won't allow that. He said half the people in this country are younger than me and I'm 34 or whatever he is. And he said they are just horrified at the Palestinian deaths and all that sort of stuff. I can't normalize.

[Jack Armstrong]

Now where is the utterly dishonest and mostly incompetent mainstream media in reporting that very easy to understand sequence of events? Israel was about to do a giant deal, mutual self defense with Saudi Arabia. Iran couldn't have that and so they sent their attack dog Hamas to blow apart the expression F up the Middle East.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

I mean it's, it's so obvious that narrative ought to be known by every American. It ought to be as familiar as you know, any other much discussed historical development. But now it's been clouded in the God the woke college student, genocide, settler, colonial. Oh for the love of heaven, cut the crap. Oh pick up your cut the crap Armstrong and Getty T shirt at Armstrong&getty.com Flying off the shelves. Seriously, can we cut the crap here?

[Joe Getty]

You can usually tell who talked to Woodward in his books. It's pretty easy because the quotes are clearer and they tend to get seen in a better light. But it seems pretty clear that the Secretary of State Anthony Blinken was talking to Woodward and his description at the very beginning of this thing of his dealings with El Sisi, the guy who runs Egypt, and how they absolutely no way Palestinians are coming into this country. One thing I'm telling you, we are not allowing Palestinians into this country. That would be a disaster. They'll try to overthrow our government, blah, blah, blah. And so, yeah, again, where are the college students not being aware of these dynamics? Those Arab countries hate the Palestinians more than the United States does or BB does.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, go talk to the Lebanese, go talk to the Kuwaitis and ask them, hey, what happens if you let a bunch of Palestinians into your country? They'll tell you more on that in a moment after a quick word from our friends at Simplisafe Home Security. We're talking about the lack of law enforcement and the crime in the air and the porch pirates and the rest of it. Well, Simplisafe is the best defense against all of that stuff. And they've extended their massive Black Friday deal for our listeners. You get 50% off a new Simplisafe security system, the most trusted system going.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, I mean, you want to take advantage of this deal. You want the Simplisafe protection. You, you're out running around over Christmas or maybe even gone for a week or whatever, knowing you've got the Simplisafe system set up. I set it up myself in like a half an hour when I moved to a bigger place. I just ordered a few more sensors, few more door cameras and stuff like that. It's easy.

[Jack Armstrong]

And the Simplisafe outdoor guard, I'm sorry, active guard outdoor protection is incredible. It prevents CR before it happens. Someone's lurking around or acting suspiciously. The agents, see them in real time, talk to them directly, set off your spotlights, call the cops before the break in and all of that. No long term contracts, no cancellation fees, and it's around a bucket a for all this protection. It's amazing. Simplisafe is extending that massive Black Friday deal once again. 50% off any new system with select professional monitoring plan. It's your last chance to claim the best offer of the year. Head to SimpliSafe.com Armstrong that's SimpliSafe.com Armstrong there's no safe like simply safe.

[Joe Getty]

You know, I don't want to rehash the election at all, but we did miss the Kamala Harris video that got put out by the DNC while we were on vacation. That got roundly criticized or just a big giant. What? Why did they put that Out. She sounded like a crazy. She sounded like a drunk, crazy person. Did you see that?

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't think I did.

[Joe Getty]

To her, to her luck. I think it got obscured by Thanksgiving. It was like two days before Thanksgiving. She was on a zoom call to supporters. It was like one of the final, you know, thanks for all your help things. And the DNC, for whatever reason, grabbed 30 seconds of it and put it out on their official platform and it went everywhere. She. She looks crazy, she sounds drunk and is just like, whose idea was this? The only thing people can think is that. That, like, it was an attempt to undermine her. Like kind of throwing her under the bus without her knowing it. Like, this is our candidate. This is why we lost. Don't blame us.

[Jack Armstrong]

So now the DNC is like libs of tick tocking, right?

[Joe Getty]

Exactly. Because nobody can figure out, why would you put that out? Why would you grab some of that private conversation and put that out for everyone to see?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, you nailed it. That's it. They want her the hell out of the way. She's a loser and a half wit. They don't want any sniff of her saying, I didn't have a long enough time to get my Joe held on too long. I couldn't get my campaign up and running. No, they want to. They want to nip that in the bud.

[Joe Getty]

Right, Right, right, right, right. Maybe we should grab that audio so you can hear it because you probably all missed it too.

[Jack Armstrong]

We'll have very much like when we come back.

[Joe Getty]

Stay here, Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

My latest episode is with Jordan Peterson. To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to let go of? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from one of the.

[Joe Getty]

Most articulate men of our time, clinical psychologist turned culture warrior, Dr. Jordan Peterson.

[Jay Shetty]

The men who prefer short term mating opportunities are psychopathic, narcissistic, ac and sadistic. So one of the unintended consequences of the sexual revolution is that the freed up women have been delivered to the psychopathic men. Most people who have post traumatic stress disorder don't have it because they were hurt. They have it because they encountered someone who wanted to hurt them. Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

In the aftermath of a transformative election like the one we Just had. It's hard to read the news without asking yourself every five seconds, how did we get here? That's exactly what we're always trying to figure out on Fiasco, a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which came down to a recount in Florida and ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. In many ways, it's the beginning of the story we're living through right now. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore, and find out how a statistical tie in the Florida vote put the nation into an unprecedented holding pattern during which American voters waited with bated breath to find out whether Al Gore or George W. Bush would be the next President of the United States. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Joe Getty]

A couple of things that I think are interesting enough to mention about the election and the results. The podcast Cast America. People that were, you know, the crowd that got Obama elected, they included David Plouffe, who was running Kamala Harris's campaign. He said last week, and I thought this was damned interesting, he said, we never had internal polling showing us ahead. We would see these national polls in various states and think, I don't know where they're getting at. So that's why Mark Halperin was regularly and I was passing it along, and his newsletter saying, internal polling shows Trump's going to win this thing. It just, he said that, just, he said, I can't share that stuff. But they're internal. And so they confirmed that last week we were never ahead in our polls ever.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow.

[Joe Getty]

So they, they at no point had any reason to think they were going to win. Then there was a different get together of some sort with people that worked on the campaign that was so full of crap. It was unbelievable. With one of the women running her campaign saying, we just couldn't break out of this narrative, this ridiculous narrative that she wouldn't do interviews. We were doing interviews constantly, but somehow the narrative took hold that she wouldn't answer questions like, what are you talking about? She went like 30 days without talking to anybody, then did a softball interview. She failed.

[Jack Armstrong]

I mean, what do you figure that's dishonesty or delusion?

[Joe Getty]

I don't know. I find that sort of thing fascinating. Do we all. Maybe we all do this. We fail at a job, you know, a marriage or career, whatever. And we come up with a story in our own head so that we're not to blame. I don't know, but I found that fascinating. She seemed like she actually believed that. And then there's this. So I'm actually going to read you what Jonah Goldberg wrote about it last week before we play it for. So Kamala Harris does some sort of thing with big donors and everybody. And people worked on the campaign and it was like a private. Ish thing, although nothing stays private anymore, where she was talking to those people.

[Jack Armstrong]

Probably trying to siphon some money out of them, some final money to retire their debts. But anyway.

[Joe Getty]

And the Democratic Party puts out a 30 second snippet of it for some reason. And Jonah Goldberg tweets it out, and I saw it lots of places. He said, this is ungood. It feels like a QVC segment where it ends with her finishing her margarita and saying, and that's why our healing crystals are 50% off for the first $100. Here's Kamala Harris in a something put out by the Democratic Party.

[Karine Jean-Pierre]

I know this is an uncertain time.

[Jack Armstrong]

I'm clear eyed about that.

[Karine Jean-Pierre]

I know you're clear eyed about it.

[Jack Armstrong]

And it feels heavy. And I just have to remind you.

[Karine Jean-Pierre]

Don'T you ever let anybody take your power from you.

[Jack Armstrong]

You have the same power that you did before November 5th, and you have the same purpose that you did, and you have the same ability to engage and inspire, and you have the same lack of ability to say something that's not vapid.

[Joe Getty]

It was. Maybe it struck you all the same way it did me as like, oh, yeah, because it had been several weeks since we'd heard from her. It's like, oh, yeah, that's Kamala Harris. She can't freaking say anything. And the question, of course, is, why did the DNC put that out? Remember, don't forget, you still have the same power. What are you talking about?

[Jack Armstrong]

What was the point of that greeting card rhetoric strung together poorly? I mean, I get that it's vaguely uplifting. We can still do this. It's a setback, but hang in there. But it's just so poorly done.

[Joe Getty]

Well. Right, so why would you. Why would you put that out there? I almost feel like it was a. This is who she was, remember? So don't blame us yet.

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't know. I don't. I so am not the sort of person who would respond to that sort of rhetoric, even if it was skillfully.

[Joe Getty]

Right, Right.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

So there. So there's that. They never had her ahead in any of their internal polls. That's something.

[Jack Armstrong]

So revealing. Yeah. Mm. Next hour, a lot of stuff to squeeze in, including some more commentary on the utterly outrageous and indefensible blanket immunity. It shouldn't even call it a pardon, but the blanket immunity Joe Biden gave his son and really de facto his entire money laundering empire. Some folks that we haven't heard from, including some folks from lefty media who are laying it on pretty thick, among other things. If you don't get next hour, grab it via podcast later on today. It's Armstrong and Getty on demand. You should probably subscribe.

[Joe Getty]

This might actually be my final comment on the Kamala Harris campaign of all time, which is probably good. But I do think some point, I don't know how long they'll have to wait because they're young. A lot of those, you know, big diamond Democratic people that were working with her, at some point they're going to write books and say we got alone in a room with her and realized what we were working with and just tried to. It's like when football teams have a quarterback that's not very good and you just give them easy plays and handoffs, easy throws. You just try to minimize the damage. You realize this is not the guy that's going to win it for you, right?

[Jack Armstrong]

I think you've said it exactly correctly. The fans are yelling, he's got to.

[Joe Getty]

Roll out and throw the ball.

[Jack Armstrong]

We've got to throw the ball. And the head coach is thinking, he can't throw the effing ball. I'm not having him throw it because he's not capable of it. So shut up.

[Joe Getty]

Right?

[Jack Armstrong]

Sit down, drink your beer.

[Joe Getty]

Someday they will tell that story and it'll be awesome. Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

Hey, it's Jay Shetty with On Purpose. My newest episode is out now with Jordan Peterson. To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from. Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. Trust me, you won't want to miss this one.

[Unknown Host of Fiasco]

It's hard to read the news these days without asking yourself, how did we get here? Fiasco is a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, this season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which resulted in a high stakes stalemate, ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco Bush v. Gore. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.