I Could Sell Those Toes To Someone Who Wants To Buy Toes

Summary

Armstrong & Getty On Demand Episode: I Could Sell Those Toes To Someone Who Wants To Buy Toes
Release Date: April 15, 2025
Host/Authors: Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty, Michael
Produced by: iHeartPodcasts

---

Introduction

Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, hosts Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty engage in a dynamic discussion filled with political commentary, social issues, and intriguing anecdotes. The episode navigates through a variety of topics, including tax policies, gender politics in sports, bizarre news stories, and critiques of modern societal trends.

---

1. Tax Policies and Economic Myths

Timestamp: [00:47] – [10:22]

The episode delves deep into the complexities of the American tax system, challenging prevalent myths and misconceptions. Michael introduces the topic by addressing tax myths from the Manhattan Institute, focusing on the notion that tax cuts pay for themselves—a claim he disputes.

• Key Points:

  • Progressivity of the Tax Code: Michael emphasizes that the U.S. tax system is highly progressive, more so than European counterparts. He cites data showing that the top 1% pay an average income tax rate of 21.5%, while the lowest 40% either pay negative taxes or only a 2% effective rate.
  • Misconceptions About Tax Burden: The hosts debate the widespread belief that the middle class bears a heavier tax burden than the wealthy. Michael references Jessica Rydle’s analysis from the Manhattan Institute, highlighting that the lower-income brackets pay less or receive more in government benefits compared to higher earners.
  • Political Populism and Taxation: Jack criticizes tax populism, arguing that the narrative of taxing the rich more is an easy demagoguery tactic that distracts from responsible fiscal policies.
  • Government Spending and Tax Revenue: The conversation touches on the unsustainable nature of current government spending, attributing fiscal irresponsibility to misconceptions about who bears the tax burden.

• Notable Quotes:

  • Michael: “The idea that the middle class pays higher tax rates than the rich. There's all kinds of numbers here I could use.” ([01:12])
  • Jack Armstrong: “It is the easiest sales proposition in the history of mankind.” ([07:01])

---

2. Bizarre News: Selling Human Toes

Timestamp: [13:39] – [17:18]

Transitioning from economic discourse, the hosts discuss a shocking news story about a woman attempting to sell human toes regurgitated by dogs.

• Key Points:

  • Incident Overview: A woman, after dogs at an animal shelter consumed a deceased man's toes, attempted to sell them online. She preserved the toes in formaldehyde and listed them for sale, violating laws against wholesaling human body parts.
  • Legal Consequences: The court deemed her actions minor, resulting in community service and a small fine rather than severe penalties.
  • Moral and Ethical Implications: The hosts express disbelief and horror at the moral degradation exemplified by such actions, highlighting the disturbing lengths individuals may go to for financial gain.

• Notable Quotes:

  • Michael: “She thinks, I'll bet I could sell those online for money.” ([16:29])
  • Jack Armstrong: “But now if I find you online hawking thumbs, I'm gonna throw the book at you.” ([15:42])

---

3. Gender Politics in Sports and Education

Timestamp: [17:55] – [28:57]

A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to critiquing contemporary gender politics, particularly focusing on transgender athletes, education policies, and societal responses.

• Key Points:

  • Transgender Athletes in High School Sports: The hosts discuss a case in Portland, Oregon, where a transgender athlete named Leah (formerly Zachary) won a high school girls' track meet. They debate the fairness and implications of allowing transgender individuals to compete in gender-specific sports categories.
  • Political Backlash and Legislation: Michael and Jack highlight the political fallout from such instances, including investigations into schools violating Title IX and efforts by the Department of Education to penalize institutions that accommodate transgender athletes.
  • Public and Institutional Reactions: The conversation touches on violent incidents involving self-identified transgender individuals and the inadequate responses from local authorities, emphasizing a perceived lack of accountability.
  • Impact on Education: The hosts critique conferences aimed at supporting LGBTQ+ initiatives in schools, arguing that educational institutions are prioritizing social agendas over fundamental educational responsibilities like teaching reading and math.

• Notable Quotes:

  • Jack Armstrong: “How are we getting to the airport in our new car? … It's just bending madness.” ([11:40])
  • Michael: “The theme for this year, queer joy is resistance reeks of the self-righteous sloganeering that turns a party into an uncomfortable, biased, scolding lecture.” ([26:32])
  • Jack Armstrong: “It's sick and it's even more amazing given the fact that Europe has gone the other direction now because usually your lefties, they look to Europe for guidance on everything and, but, but not on this one.” ([25:50])

---

4. Corporate Reactions to Social Activism

Timestamp: [26:06] – [28:57]

The discussion shifts to the financial repercussions faced by organizations that adopt radical social stances, using the San Francisco Pride Parade as a case study.

• Key Points:

  • Financial Strain Due to Ideological Positions: The San Francisco Pride organization has encountered significant budget shortfalls due to the loss of major corporate sponsorships, attributed to its aggressive activist branding.
  • Shift in Organizational Identity: The move from celebrating LGBTQ+ achievements to adopting a more militant and preachy stance has alienated sponsors and led to financial instability.
  • Broader Implications for Activism: The hosts argue that extreme ideological positions can lead to practical consequences, such as loss of funding and support, which undermine the very causes they aim to promote.

• Notable Quotes:

  • Jack Armstrong: “It's the easiest demagoguery in the history of demagoguery.” ([04:22])
  • Michael: “It's repulsive and evil.” ([24:31])

---

5. Immigration and Stereotyping

Timestamp: [30:02] – [32:46]

The conversation turns to immigration, focusing on stereotypes perpetuated by media and political rhetoric.

• Key Points:

  • Media Representation: The hosts critique how media portray immigrants, often conflating hardworking individuals with criminals, thereby fueling negative stereotypes.
  • Deportation Policies: They discuss the harsh realities of deportation, emphasizing that most immigrants seek better lives and are unjustly maligned as criminals.
  • Public Perception vs. Reality: The hosts highlight the disconnect between the public’s perception of immigrants and the actual contributions and intentions of the majority.

• Notable Quotes:

  • Jack Armstrong: “They are being portrayed by the left as honest, hard-working murderers who just dreamed beautiful dreams of committing crimes in this country.” ([32:13])
  • Michael: “The vast majority of people who are coming into this country illegally are just, why wouldn't you want to live here? And they want to work.” ([31:55])

---

6. Humorous Interlude and Social Commentary

Timestamp: [30:16] – [35:21]

Injecting humor into serious discussions, the hosts share a satirical piece from the Babylon Bee and reflect on generational attitudes toward taxation and fiscal responsibility.

• Key Points:

  • Satirical Content: A comedian's skit mocks the Trump administration's deportation policies, blending absurd humor with sharp social commentary.
  • Generational Perspectives on Taxes: The hosts lament the shift from previous generations' frugality to the current society's willingness to overspend, both personally and governmentally, leading to economic instability.
  • Cultural Shifts: There's a nostalgic reflection on the perceived decline in ethical and financial responsibility compared to past generations.

• Notable Quotes:

  • Jack Armstrong: “Just real quick, how about the generation that says that they like having slaves, we want to keep having slaves. That was a pretty bad generation.” ([33:35])
  • Michael: “It's amazing to me that this happened, but it seems to happen. A society that's willing to spend beyond their means in their own lives allows the government to do that.” ([34:30])

---

Conclusion

The episode of Armstrong & Getty On Demand offers a blend of incisive political analysis, social critique, and dark humor. Hosts Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty, and Michael navigate through contentious topics with a particular focus on challenging prevailing narratives around taxation, gender politics, and societal values. Through a combination of data-driven discussions and anecdotal storytelling, the episode encourages listeners to question mainstream perspectives and consider alternative viewpoints on pressing contemporary issues.

---

Note: This summary excludes non-content sections such as advertisements, intros, outros, and unrelated banter to focus solely on the substantive discussions presented in the episode.

Transcript

[Jack Armstrong]

Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now here's Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

A writer for the 1990 show Mighty Morphin Power Rangers is now saying that it was a mistake to cast a black actor as the Black Ranger and an Asian actor as the Yellow Ranger. And he really regrets having a Mexican actor play the lazy Ranger.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow, wow, wow.

[Michael]

Play the Tesla Saturday Night Live joke for me, Michael.

[Joe Getty]

Tesla is reportedly having trouble selling cyber trucks, partly due to its slogan cybertruck. What if Kanye was a car?

[Michael]

Oh, you weren't here Friday. I got to do this later. The track list for Kanye's latest album.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, no. Oh, no.

[Michael]

Oh, it's amazing.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, I don't doubt it.

[Michael]

So it's tax day, so I want to just mention some tax things and trying to figure out how to present this because I got a bunch of numbers here. You're listening to them on the radio. How do I. How do I. How do. How. How do I present it in such a way that you can comprehend it since you can't look at it or you don't just start thinking about something else? But anyway, it's these tax myths from the Manhattan Institute, and some of them are taking a shot at some of our favorite conservative tax myths that, for instance, tax cuts pay for themselves. They haven't yet. I mean, there's never been an example where the revenue that came in from increased, you know, economic activity matched the amount you cut by taxes.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. I think it's strong enough recommendation to say that they partly pay for themselves, whereas tax increases do nothing but screw the economy. Right.

[Michael]

And that doesn't bother me. And I'm all for people keeping their own money so it doesn't have to. I mean, you keeping your money, to me, seems like a good thing. Although you do have to fund the government mostly, as Joe pointed out last hour. We got to cut spending.

[Jack Armstrong]

Clearly.

[Michael]

But anyway, I wanted to get to this one because this is such a big talk talking point for the left, and it shouldn't be. The middle class pays higher tax rates than the rich. And you've heard versions of this your entire adult life, including the fourth richest man in the world, Warren Buffett, who famously said, why do I pay lower taxes than my secretary? Which is just a freaking lie. And I don't know why he went along with it. I mean, it's got to do with, you know, he hasn't taken his money out yet, so he hasn't realized the capital gains, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So Jessica Rydle, writing for the Manhattan Institute, says this is spectacularly false. The idea that the middle class pays higher tax rates than the rich. There's all kinds of numbers here I could use. Within income taxes, the lowest earning 40% pay a negative rate, getting more from the government than they pay the lowest 40%. The median earning family pays an effective rate of 2%.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right.

[Michael]

The top 1%, just 1% of people pay an average income rate of 21.5%. So it's not even close. But there's all kinds of different ways to break this down. Our tax code is incredibly progressive. It's gotten more progressive over the years, and it's way more progressive than Europe, which is the opposite of what you generally hear from lefties. What would be the best example of that? Since 1979, for instance, the share of income taxes paid by the top 20% has jumped from 2/3 to 90% of taxes. I mean, whenever you hear. And. Well, I meant to start with this. So how do you present this in such a way that most people aren't saying, oh, I'm not rich. So I, you know, that's like, maybe that sucks, maybe I agree with you, but what do I care, right? The problem is when you only have a small percentage of people paying the giant chunk of taxes, then nobody cares about the spending, right?

[Jack Armstrong]

That's the biggest problem, in my opinion. Intentional and always has been, narrow tax base to the point that none of your plans can be voted down. Tax populism is the shortest putt in the history of political golf. I mean, you just stick them with it. They should pay for you. And you're thinking, okay.

[Michael]

Right, if, if the bulk of people feel like their taxes aren't that high, that'd be the middle class. And, and below. If that bulk of people, which is most people, don't feel like their taxes are that high, then they don't care about any of these things they hear on talk radio or out of the House of Representatives or whatever about spending. What do you care? If you, if you were paying the sort of taxes that Europe pays, The whole social safety net thing that Europe has is funded by the middle class. They're. The tax rates for the middle class in Europe are way higher than they are for the middle class in America.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right? But if you can sell people on the notion that if anybody gets higher taxes, it should be that damn rich guy who, who doesn't pay as high a rate as I do. That's what I heard I mean that is, that is so easy to get people to jump on board. It is an absolutely cost free demagoguing and, and you know, chunk of dishonesty, but people love hearing it.

[Michael]

Let's see if I can say this slow enough that you can take it in. Last year, the top earning 20%, the top fifth of taxpayers paid just under $2 trillion in income tax. That next quintile, the next 20% of people right above it. And you're still doing well, you know, if you're in that second 20% at the top paid 228 billion. So the top 20 paid 2 trillion in taxes. The next 20 paid 228 billion. The remaining 60% of earners paid a collective income tax of $90 billion.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow.

[Michael]

The bottom 60% paid 90 billion in taxes. The top 20% paid 2 trillion. So when you say when are the rich going to pay their fair share? What the hell are you talking about?

[Jack Armstrong]

What would the fair share be? Well, right again, it's the easiest demagoguery in the history of demagoguery. Getting people to buy into it. The, the, the less you try at work, the more money you'll make. Okay? It's about as hard a sell as that. We're going to spend like lunatics and we'll tax him instead of you and you'll get the benefits.

[Michael]

Okay, so Ridle writes that the Biden White House contributed to this myth a lot. You probably remember Joe Biden giving a big speech and saying this a couple of years ago that billionaires pay an average rate of 8%. Well, if you twist all kinds of numbers and ignore the fact that when they finally realize their, their wealth, when they take it out, they're going to pay a way, way, way by 100% then that, yeah, you can twist the numbers to make that true, but that's just, it's just not accurate. I mean, it's a, it's a set of facts that lie way more than they reveal. And you know, but it works. Like you said, it's such an easy issue to demagogue. Elon Musk does not pay taxes at the rate of somebody who has $400 billion or whatever he has. If he took it all out, he would though. I mean, if he cashed it all out of the stock market, he absolutely would.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right, right. Which is why the left is so desperate to tax people on their assets, even if they don't have any income from them at this point, which would be insidious and trust me, would creep down to you and yours soon enough. But.

[Michael]

Well, right, so the, the way the middle class gets taxed so heavily in Europe is mostly VAT value added taxes that they have in all those countries where you pay. And that hits the middle class the hardest because the richer you are, the less you care about another, you know, a sales tax basically on everything. And do liberals want to go there? Do they want to go there where the middle class is paying the bulk of taxes? Because that's the way they do it in Europe where they have their, you know, socialist heaven that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I just, I don't see any winning this battle because the misperception is so widespread.

[Michael]

But.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah.

[Michael]

What's going to happen? Do you think we're just going to play it clear and run it clear into the ground with. Yes, with, with claiming that the rich don't play pay their fair share and that the reason we're so far in debt is because billionaires get all the tax breaks. It's just, it's so, as he said, it's a spectacular lie. I mean it's not just misleading, it's the opposite of true.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, the rich by many, many multiples. Yeah.

[Michael]

The rich are paying for everything.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, yeah. Correct. Yeah. It's just if I were to convince a fairly unsophisticated voter, you know, speaking of quintiles, like 80% of the country doesn't not know that this is true, what you just said, even though it's indisputable and if you were to propose to that 80%, you know, roughly the deal I described, that we will spend like lunatics, you will benefit from it and we will tax him because he isn't paying his fair. That 80% of voters would vote for that proposition over and over and over again till the day they are in the grave. It is the easiest sales proposition in the history of mankind. I have given up. I have despaired again.

[Michael]

The top 20% paid 2 trillion. The next 20% 228 billion.

[Jack Armstrong]

The bottom 10.

[Michael]

Yeah, well, the bottom 60% paid $92 billion in taxes last year. And you're gonna go around saying when will the rich pay their fair share and think that's gonna fix things? It'd be awesome. If it was true. If it was true, it'd be fantastic.

[Jack Armstrong]

Because you know, such an easy fixes, it fixes me getting into office. So you need to know, God, we're.

[Michael]

Gonna run out of money. And then, and then, and then everything's gonna suck and could suck for the rest of history in the United States. We just won't be a powerful dynamic able to defend ourselves nation because of this lie that we hear over and over and over again.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. And a couple of others that are its cheerful sidekicks. This is where no we can just grow our way out of our debt.

[Michael]

Friends, we're enjoying Nihilist Joe on tax day this year.

[Jack Armstrong]

No, I'm not a nihilist, I'm a realist. No, you've described exactly what's going to happen. Honey, if we keep buying new cars and vacationing in Hawaii every year, we're going to be dead broke in three years. That is correct, yes.

[Michael]

And where are we going this year for vacation? Hawaii.

[Jack Armstrong]

Hawaii. Yeah. How are we getting to the airport in our new car? All right, standing by my reasoning. It's just bending madness. Coming up later in the hour. We're breaking a little late. I'm not sure we can squeeze it in the next segment, but we'll try.

[Michael]

Fantastic. What was I gonna say? I know I had a good thing to tease, but I don't know why. It was because I'm sick, because I'm on cold medicine. It's all on the way. Stay here.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty.

[News Anchor]

The 5.2 quakes epicenter near Julian, California, a mountain town about 60 miles northeast of San Diego. At the San Diego Zoo Safari park, frightened elephants instinctively forming what's known as an alert circle to protect the herd. People got an early warning. Scientists at Caltech say the Myshake app alerted people this quake was coming just seconds before it hit.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. Okay. Multiple layers of interesting there.

[Michael]

Yeah. So I wanted to talk about the.

[Jack Armstrong]

Elements predict the earthquake. Now The Elephant Critical 3 seconds Warning or whatever it was a couple might.

[Michael]

Be two, so you don't even get that third one. So I just, I think earthquake predicting apps are stupid, the whole concept. But interesting about the elephants, though.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, indeed. If you haven't seen the video, we'll post a link at armstrongygetti.com, but yeah, the ground begins to shake and the elephants look around nervously. Then they all back into a circle, butts together, trunks out, looking for whatever danger might come their way to protect the herd. It's really quite amazing. And one of our beloved listeners who sent along the link pointed out that humans, like, are unaware of what's happening until somebody says, yeah, it's an earthquake. And so then everybody runs around and isn't sure what to do then anyway. But the elephants are like, all right, emergency protocol 3C. They get into their alert circle.

[Michael]

It's funny that Is interesting.

[Jack Armstrong]

I'm so fascinated by elephants since I was a little kid. Continue to be. I mean, that's my next act in life. Jack, a Heff lump researcher. And there was the earthquake.

[Michael]

Earthquake, earthquake, Earthquakes still happening.

[Jack Armstrong]

There you go. That's just what it sounded like.

[Michael]

We're experiencing an earthquake. Please, do you want to tease what you've got? Because what I, what I'm about to say is going to wipe everybody's mind clean and so they're not going to be able to focus.

[Jack Armstrong]

An important gender bending madness update coming up next. Stay with us.

[Michael]

So this is a headline. It's not from the New York Post. It's not from a tabloid. It's from NBC News. Woman admits trying to sell human toes regurgitated by dogs.

[Jack Armstrong]

You know, as I said the other day, the supply chain issues in that business seem daunting to me. How can you keep your supply coming?

[Michael]

She works at an animal shelter.

[Jack Armstrong]

Okay.

[Michael]

They took in a couple of dogs from some bloke who had died. And we've done these stories before.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's horrible.

[Michael]

You know, you die in your home alone with your pets and eventually they get hungry enough that they. To survive. They eat you.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, Grimm's fairy tales.

[Michael]

And so this guy, this, this guy had died in his home and the dogs ate off his toes to survive. He's dead. The dogs go to the shelter.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's terrible. We went to market, this little piggy went in Rover. Oy.

[Michael]

You should have a will for your pets, I guess, in case you die so they don't just end up in the shelter. You know, I'm guessing there's like, you know, all kinds of things that weren't perfect about this person's life who dies alone, perhaps being eaten by their own dogs. But. So when the dogs apparently didn't digest the, the toes well, for some digits.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes.

[Michael]

Regurgitated them. This woman, her, her thought was not, oh, my God, gross. Or what are those? Or, or what? Whatever. She thought, I'll bet I could sell those online for money. Yes, yes, she thought she could. She could make as much as 250 bucks by selling them online. So she, she took the toes, she put them in a jar of formaldehyde, and she listed them online for sale, which is actually against the law for some reason. I don't, can't believe we have laws that deal with this.

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't think you're allowed to wholesale body parts just as an asset. That's what it is.

[Michael]

Yeah. That's what the law is. Yeah. She she barely qualified for breaking the law, according to the judge, and he gave her, like, community service and a small fine. It wasn't like a hardcore version of selling body parts.

[Jack Armstrong]

But now if I find you online hawking thumbs, I'm gonna throw the book at you. All right? We have an understanding. All right?

[Michael]

And by God, if there's a human head, you will not see the light of day.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. Well, okay. You know, we kind of glossed over the critical moment you mentioned it, when she thought, you know, I could probably sell these toes to someone who wants to buy toes and make some money.

[Michael]

I like to think she looks in the. She looks in the cage, sees regurgitated human toes. I realize how gross this is, people. And she thinks she sees it, recognizes.

[Jack Armstrong]

What it is, and exercise.

[Michael]

My ship has come in.

[Jack Armstrong]

My co workers just see severed toes. I see opportunity, said this young capitalist. Wow. I like to think I'm a fairly creative guy, but I. I don't think that thought would occur to me.

[Michael]

She thinks outside the box. You have to give her credit for that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right? Coming up, gender bending madness update. And it goes to the core of how sick our education system. Trump's trying to clean it out. Will he be successful? Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

It was reported that several White House officials are refusing to answer messages from journalists if their email signatures include identifying pronouns, which is extremely frustrating for New York Times reporter.

[Michael]

She.

[Jack Armstrong]

Her. They.

[Joe Getty]

Them.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. Wow, that reminds me, do we have that, that. That wackadoodle pronoun audio I asked for? I don't see it. All right, I'll yell at people behind the scenes. No problem. It's time for a gender bending madness update. Come on.

[News Anchor]

I kept hearing about this thing called.

[Michael]

They'Re loco. We're in a brave new world.

[Jack Armstrong]

So to report on today, congratulations to the brave transgender athlete who nabbed first place during a girls high school track meet in Portland, Oregon. The boy who goes by Leah used to compete under the name Zachary, where he lost a lot, but now that he is a she, he beat the hell out of those girls. High jumped 4ft, 8 inches, beating the second place finisher by 2 inches, and has nabbed that first place ribbon. Way to go, fella. Way to best those girls. You're a better. You're better at being a girl than they are.

[Listener]

Isn't it weird how you never see this happen the other way in the history of everything?

[Jack Armstrong]

That's right. Yeah. Yeah. So this. I'm tempted to go off on the tangent of Donald J. And the Department of Education trying to Rein this sort of in and sort of thing in. And they have opened an investigation into Portland Public Schools for violating Title 9 and have promised to pull federal funding for states who continue to allow men and women's sports.

[Michael]

I continue to be amazed by the crowd reaction to this sort of stuff that there isn't more of a just outcry or walking out or refusing to participate or whatever. And like you always think it's true, you're. You're dealing a lot of times with kids who are being told by adults that it makes sense.

[Jack Armstrong]

So over and over again, which we'll get to in a second or two, especially in Cal Unicornia schools. Although, come on. Oregon and California are not only neighbors, they are ideological brethren in that in defense of those two fine states, there are a hell of a lot of perfectly reasonable normal people. They just don't control the politics. They're not in the urban centers, so they never win elections anyway. Moving along. Andy Ngo posted the other day that a violent Portland Trantifa member. These are these radically violent so called transgender people who are torching Tesla dealers among other other things and committing all sorts of acts of insanity and violence. But this fellow by the name of Philip Delisi, decided to not only become transgender but transracial and now identifies as a Latinx woman, made repeated violent death and stalking threats against Andy, who we've talked to several times on the show, which he reported to police and nothing happened. Not only that, but this guy has committed violent acts and Portland judge dismissed the case earlier this year. Well, Portland has moved in the direction of sanity in their prosecutor's office and their mayor and stuff like that and they have reinstated refiled criminal charges against this self proclaimed antifa super soldier. What's a Philip Delisi now calls himself Isabel Rosa Arojo. That's a mentally ill person, period. Mentally ill. Moving along.

[Michael]

Super soldier, his term.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, yeah, wow. Antifa super soldier. That's right. All sorts of pictures of this guy online with a big knife in hand wearing a spiked dog collar and makeup and then there he is in a gas mask and like an all black and I'm an antifa SWAT team member outfit. And again could threaten and hurt people right and left and Portland would do nothing about it until fairly recently. Anyway, moving along. I thought this was so interesting. Beth O'Connor has been a five term member of the main House of Representatives and she's talking to Caroline Downey in the National Review and she had proposed what she believed to be a common sense bill to ban men and Women's sports. But instead of seeing the usual bipartisan spirit that Republicans in the state legislature have long expected from their Democratic neighbors, I mean, Maine is a state where reasonable people get along even if they disagree. Her proposal this time was met with a flood of ugly messages from special interest groups claiming she was inventing a fake crisis, an argument she knew to be false. She'd personally seen the medals won by dudes in girl sports. My email inbox was full of threats, she told National Review. I got phone calls telling me that this wasn't happening anywhere, but I knew it was happening. There were instances it was getting more and more difficult to work with the Democrats at all. They were in lockstep. So I'm just happy to be done and retire from politics. The long and short of it is, from COVID on, Maine has seen a huge influx of moneyed Northeastern progressives come into the state, and it's utterly upended their politics. And they've gone from kind of libertarian left, you know, let's just all mind our own business to now like activist gender bending madness politics, which has got to be just incredibly disturbing. And then you got the Maine, the gal who won the election for Maine's governor, whatever her name is, who got into that arguing match with the president at the White House and is staunchly defending gender bending madness in all its forms. But they say There are now two Mains, Maine and northern Massachusetts. About 60% of the population lives south of Augusta, and it's all Massachusettsans who've moved into Maine.

[Michael]

So interesting that's happened so many different places.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. And totally changed just the culture of the state, which I find disturbing, but wanted to get to. This is the gender bending madness update continues. We mentioned a couple of days ago, a few days ago, that California school administrators had held a conference titled Lead with Pride Summit Out Proud and Moving Forward. And teachers, administrators, county office of education, personnel, district superintendents, education college professors, and drag queens from around the state were attending this. This conference. And we mentioned one session that's all about building LGBTQ organizations and schools and helping kids transition. Again, these are school administrators going to seminars on how to help kids transition.

[Michael]

Because that's your job at a school to help kids deal with their gender issues.

[Jack Armstrong]

And Jack, as you always point out, they're not teaching the kids to read and write and do do math, Right.

[Michael]

I would be.

[Jack Armstrong]

They're failing miserably at their core job.

[Michael]

I would be against this even if they were scoring at 90% of a proficiency in reading and math. But it's not so the failing at the main thing and doing this, which is pretty hard to take.

[Jack Armstrong]

Then the California Globe is pointing out that they have a session titled Combating Transphobic Legislation with Inclusive Sex Ed. And at that, attendees will be filled with this information to pass on to the kids from independent consultant Van Jones, a woman pretending to be a man. The most disturbing information Jones will present is to skirt laws to provide students with disinformation on puberty blockers. And I'll summarize. They're teaching the kids that the puberty blockers and the massive hormone treatments have no permanent effects, will not change their bodies for the rest of their lives. That is a myth and a right wing conspiracy and that is absolutely fine to do that as a child. It is repulsive and evil.

[Michael]

It's sick and it's, it's even more amazing given the fact that Europe has gone the other direction now because usually your, your lefties, they look to Europe for guidance on everything and, but, but not on this one. I guess they feel like Europe's wrong, I guess.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, right. Or they just ignore that it's happening.

[Michael]

Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

And the final note, and I have believed for a long time that LGB could, would really do itself a favor by divorcing itself from the T plus minus over the power of three crowd. It used to be just lgb, lesbian, gay, bisexual. People said, hey, quit, quit beating on us and denying us jobs and blah, blah, blah.

[Listener]

I know several in the LGB world that 100% agree with you.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right? Yeah, I'm absolutely joining with the same people I've talked to of that same orientation to express this, but. So the San Francisco Pride Month Parade festival organization has been leaning harder and harder into its activist identity. Quoting Richie Greenberg, also in the California Globe, it's turned what was once a jubilant commemoration into a sanctimonious soapbox. Its theme for this year, queer joy is resistance reeks of the signed. The kind of self righteous sloganeering that turns a party into an uncomfortable, biased, scolding lecture. But now, with a gaping budgetary hole threatening its June 28th to 29th extravaganza, estimates fear the shortfall could reach about two thirds of its operating costs because the organization has recently lost about $300,000 in corporate sponsorships from corporate heavyweights like Comcast, Meta, Anheuser Busch, local wine producers, that sort of thing. It's not just a budgetary hiccup. It's a big flashing neon sign that even the most progressive enterprises can't outrun. The consequences of their own ideological bullying. And then they go into the Bud Light story again. To summarize this, because we don't have a ton of time, although it's very, very well written, the absolute far, far end of radical leftism that is represented by turning little boys into little girls, having them play in sports, drag queens entertaining kindergarteners, the rest of it. I mean, the percentage of human beings that thinks that's appropriate or cool is tiny. And these big giant corporations have realized, wow, look at who we're in bed with. No pun intended. And they're saying, yeah, no, we can't do that anymore. So the increasingly scolding, hyper radical pride organization has realized the money spigot has run dry, which I thought was interesting. It's a gender bending madness. Update. Do we have any clothes on that? That would probably be a good idea. You got to have. You gotta have a cap there. What do you call it?

[Michael]

Just hang tag.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah.

[News Anchor]

I kept hearing about this thing called.

[Jack Armstrong]

All right, now fade it. We'll get this right when we actually do the show.

[Michael]

Right when the rehearsal is over and the actual show begins.

[Jack Armstrong]

Jack, I find myself wondering this. Do you have more of those fabulous and fascinating tax myths for us?

[Michael]

I do. And then we're going to talk to a tax attorney in hour three about where things are tax wise in America right now on this tax day, April 15th. I know I personally wrote the biggest check I've ever written in my life a week ago. It was very fun. Thank you.

[Jack Armstrong]

Thank you.

[Michael]

Especially knowing how well it's spent with a variety of things that Doge has pointed out to us. I'm hoping my money somehow accidentally went to a battleship that we actually need, as opposed to a trans opera in Ireland or something like that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Or more likely, and I will bore you with this at some point because you can't stop me. More likely, it went to an able bodied, stoned guy who just doesn't want to work, who gets Medicaid from your taxes.

[Michael]

Right?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yep. That's able bodied, male, not working by choice, living quite a nice lifestyle.

[Michael]

Yeah, we got way too many of those. No doubt. Nvidia vows to spend a half a trillion dollars building AI servers in the United States.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes.

[Michael]

Better or worse, among other things. We can talk about. Stay here.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty. More hilarity from our friends at the Babylon Bee.

[Comedian]

I came to this country with nothing but the clothes on my back and a dream. A dream that I could come here and commit many, many crimes. But the Trump administration deported me. And now my Dreams of killing many people and committing much crime have been shattered. I am as A.D. i thought America was a place where you could freely traffic drugs, maybe some people as well. I also came here to rob, do some cocaine. I also want to do non crime things like see a Chuck E. Cheese, go to a Doyers game. But mostly all the crime stuff. I know I'm being deported thanks to President Trump. I've only killed five people. There was so much more I wanted to do. So many dreams yet to be dreamed.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow.

[Michael]

I don't know if I'm comfortable with that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, yeah. Oh, yeah, yeah. I was a little uncomfortable with that, frankly.

[Michael]

Yeah. I mean, because as we all know, there have been some illegals here that have committed horrible crimes. And amazingly, there are cities and states that want to protect them from being booted out of the country. That's insanity. But the vast majority of people who are coming into this country illegally are just, why wouldn't you want to live here? And they want to work.

[Jack Armstrong]

But that's, that's the, I think that's the under layer of that bit was that the dreams and aspirations of good hard working people are being applied to criminal gang members and rapists and murderers.

[Michael]

Right.

[Jack Armstrong]

To defend them from being deported or ICE cooperating with local authorities. They're being portrayed by the left is honest, hard working murderers who just dreamed beautiful dreams of committing crimes in this country. How dare you turn them over to ice? I think it's subtle, but it's good.

[Michael]

Yes.

[Listener]

Katie, Just to give a visual, this Guy had an MS.13 tattoo on his forehead. And when he said I am sad, he pointed at a teardrop tattoo on his face. That is killer. So just, just a visual for him. He was clearly one of the bad ones.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, yeah. Hey. Hard working people find a way that they can apply and stay if they follow the law. And that's fine. They love this country. Hey, we're, we're fellow Americans. Welcome. You're gonna break the law, though. We're gonna ship you to hell out to that, that recreation complex in El Salvador.

[Michael]

We've had a number of texters say they thought you were interviewing RFK Jr today. Now, that's me, Jack Armstrong. I just have some sort of disease. This might be my last disease. I told my son last night when I went to bed, I said, you can have my watch if in the morning I'm, I've passed.

[Jack Armstrong]

Don't let the dog eat my toes.

[Michael]

Yes. And don't let the dog eat me. Yeah, I don't know I know I sound bad, but the key is I feel as bad as I sound. I feel where I was complaining earlier about the baby boomer generation, the worst generation in American history, around the whole tax thing on this tax day and how we ended up in a situation. Situation where we spend more than we take in, and we're just comfortable with that. We're just going to continue it. Both parties seem to be fine with that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Just real quick, how about the generation that says that said we like having slaves, we want to keep having slaves. That was a pretty bad generation.

[Michael]

Yeah. What was. What did I see yesterday that was so good? I saw a comedian somewhere. Was that on Saturday Night Live? Yeah, it was on Saturday Night Live. Comedian on Saturday Night Live. It was a bit during the news and as one of the new cast members, I mean, he was talking about how we treat the whole uber doordash sort of world and around, you know, they're obviously struggling. They got a crappy car, they come up to your door in the rain, whatever, like that. You're just mad that they weren't faster. You give them three bucks. He said it's clearly. He said it clearly proves that, you know, the whole slave thing. A lot of us would have said, you know what? This is pretty handy.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. Wow.

[Michael]

This was a Hispanic guy. The way we. You know, I don't know. I had a point I was gonna make. I don't remember what it was. It's a cold medicine.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh.

[Michael]

The whole baby boomer thing was around taxes and how we've gotten ourselves into the situation. And just culturally, I. It's amazing to me that this happened, but it seems to happen. A society that's willing to spend beyond their means in their own lives allows the government to do that. It just seems to be the case in the. In the society that didn't. Our parents didn't spend beyond their means, didn't allow the government to do it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Thriftiness for our entire history as people was not viewed as a strategy. It was viewed as a moral question.

[Michael]

Right. And that went out the window for a lot of different reasons. Maybe we'll talk about later. If you missed a second to get.

[Jack Armstrong]

The podcast Armstrong and Gettysburg.