I'm Still On Team Glug Glug Glug

Summary

Armstrong & Getty On Demand: "I'm Still On Team Glug Glug Glug" – Episode Summary

Release Date: March 25, 2025
Host: Armstrong & Getty
Produced by: iHeartPodcasts

In the episode titled "I'm Still On Team Glug Glug Glug," hosts Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty delve into a variety of topics ranging from humorous anecdotes and pop culture discussions to in-depth political analysis. The conversation is lively, filled with witty exchanges, and punctuated by insightful commentary on contemporary issues.

---

1. Humorous Banter and Pop Culture References (00:02 – 07:22)

The episode kicks off with light-hearted interactions, including a humorous conversation about a bizarre hot dog recipe shared by Katie Green. The hosts playfully mock the oddity of using a "vocal fryer" for cooking hot dogs, highlighting the show's signature blend of humor and sarcasm.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (00:47): "She uses a vocal fryer apparently to cook her hot dogs."

The discussion transitions to a reference of the "louder Milkweezes" clip, showcasing the hosts' familiarity with internet memes and viral content.

Notable Quote:

• Joe Getty (00:59): "Katie, you do it pretty well. It's like that clip we play from louder Milkweezes."

Michael joins the conversation, adding depth to the humorous exchange by dissecting the quirks of the viral video, emphasizing the group's dynamic and chemistry.

---

2. Critique of the TV Show "Severance" (03:04 – 06:11)

Jack Armstrong expresses his frustration with the TV series "Severance," critiquing its never-ending story arc filled with red herrings and lack of conclusive developments. He parallels this with classical narrative structures, lamenting the absence of a satisfying conclusion.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (03:04): "The arc that doesn't arc every time it starts to get towards something like a conclusion, a revelation, they just introduce more red herrings than the rest of it."

Joe Getty counters by recommending "Loudermilk," a show about a sober alcoholic, praising its authenticity and relatability.

Notable Quote:

• Joe Getty (04:24): "So Loudermilk, if you've never seen it, is about a sober alcoholic. And I know a lot of sober alcoholics, and it is dead on."

Jack further emphasizes his discontent with "Severance," comparing its plot progression to an implausible soap opera.

---

3. The Science of "The Ick" in Dating (06:11 – 09:03)

The hosts explore the concept of "the ick," a sudden feeling of aversion in dating triggered by minor quirks or actions. Referencing a scientific study from Azusa Pacific University, they discuss how superficial traits can derail potential relationships.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (06:11): "The study that figured out your personality traits matter. People with high disgust sensitivity... are more likely to experience the ick in dating."

Joe Getty shares personal anecdotes about how seemingly trivial actions can lead to the end of a budding relationship, underlining the study's relevance.

Notable Quote:

• Joe Getty (07:56): "Girls could have mentioned dog fighting. I'd be fine."

Jack critiques modern media's portrayal of masculinity, suggesting that societal pressures contribute to the increased sensitivity leading to "the ick."

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (09:03): "They just say, no, sorry, that's not good enough. If you're born a boy, you play boy sports or you get in an open league, but you're not playing girl sports, period."

---

4. Politics: The Democratic Party in Decline (11:17 – 28:15)

A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to analyzing the current state of the Democratic Party in the United States. The hosts discuss reports and studies indicating the party's plummeting approval ratings, internal conflicts, and strategic missteps.

Notable Quotes:

• Joe Getty (11:25): "A number of pieces written in the last week about the trouble the Democratic Party is in. Lowest approval rating it's ever had..."
• Jack Armstrong (19:33): "Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative according to all polls."

The conversation highlights Ezra Klein's insights from the New York Times, emphasizing the Democratic Party's struggles with losing working-class voters, diminishing influence over the media ecosystem, and the rise of pro-Trump sentiments among traditionally Democratic demographics.

Notable Quote:

• Joe Getty (22:02): "Millennials were one of the most progressive generations in our nation's history. And it looks like Gen Z is about to be one of the most conservative that we've experienced in maybe 50 to 60 years."

Jack Armstrong echoes these sentiments, attributing the shift to the party's overemphasis on progressive ideologies, which alienated moderate and conservative members within their base.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (25:27): "Millennials... Gen Z is about to be one of the most conservative that we've experienced in maybe 50 to 60 years."

The hosts delve into demographic changes, policy impacts, and the implications of the upcoming 2030 census, predicting significant losses in House seats and electoral votes for the Democrats.

---

5. Gender and Sports: Biological Differences (09:39 – 17:22)

Transitioning from politics, Armstrong and Getty discuss recent scientific findings on sex differences in sports performance. Referencing a paper from Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews, they argue against the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports, citing biological disparities that begin before puberty.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (14:42): "The performance gap between top male and female athletes ranges from about 10% over 40% depending on the sport."

Joe Getty and Jack Armstrong critique the notion that testosterone suppression can level the playing field, maintaining that inherent biological differences ensure that males continue to outperform females in various athletic domains.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (16:44): "It diminishes it. It does not eliminate it."

The discussion touches on societal expectations of masculinity, the impact of media portrayals, and the challenges faced by young male athletes in maintaining their athletic performance amidst evolving gender norms.

---

6. Cybersecurity Incident Involving a University Football Coach (31:02 – 33:42)

In a brief yet serious segment, the hosts report on former University of Michigan assistant football coach Matthew Weiss facing federal hacking charges. Weiss is accused of targeting female athletes, downloading their intimate photos, and making inappropriate comments about their bodies.

Notable Quote:

• Joe Getty (31:34): "Kidding. What a nut job."

Jack Armstrong reflects on the gravity of the situation, emphasizing the violation of privacy and the ethical breaches involved.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (32:09): "I pity kids who are just think porn is love and life anyway."

The hosts express their dismay over the misuse of technology and the dark side of digital privacy violations.

---

7. Final Thoughts and Closing Remarks (33:42 – 36:16)

Concluding the episode, the hosts offer their final reflections on the topics discussed. Katie Green humorously suggests potential malfunctions of robots in medical procedures, while Jack Armstrong muses on the future of college sports amidst changing societal norms.

Notable Quote:

• Jack Armstrong (34:07): "What the what? Katie Green, our esteemed newswoman, has a final thought."

Joe Getty underscores the uncertainty surrounding college sports, questioning the longevity of traditional formats in the face of evolving cultural attitudes.

Notable Quote:

• Joe Getty (34:46): "Maryland's players were asked in the post-game conference what makes Kevin Willard a coach worth listening to. And one of the players said, well, he do pay us the money."

The episode wraps up with a mix of humor and somber reflections on the state of politics, gender issues, and societal changes, leaving listeners with food for thought.

---

Conclusion

"I'm Still On Team Glug Glug Glug" showcases Armstrong and Getty's ability to navigate a spectrum of topics with humor, critical analysis, and engaging dialogue. From dissecting pop culture phenomena to unpacking complex political and social issues, the hosts provide listeners with a multifaceted perspective on the current landscape. Notable for their sharp wit and insightful commentary, this episode offers both entertainment and thoughtful reflection.

---

Key Takeaways:

• Pop Culture & Humor: The hosts maintain their trademark humor while discussing viral content and quirky trends.
• Political Analysis: A deep dive into the Democratic Party's declining influence, supported by recent studies and expert opinions.
• Gender Issues in Sports: An exploration of biological differences affecting athletic performance and the implications for transgender athletes.
• Cybersecurity Concerns: Highlighting the misuse of technology in compromising personal privacy.
• Societal Reflections: Final thoughts emphasize the ongoing challenges and transformations within various societal sectors.

Listeners who enjoy a blend of humor, critical insights, and candid discussions will find this episode both entertaining and enlightening.

Transcript

[Jack Armstrong]

Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now here's Armstrong and Getty.

[Katie Green]

Like my lazy husband. Hot dogs. I start by adding onion and bell peppers and seasoning, of course. And then I fry them up and add cheese. And then I add extra seasoning. Anyway, it was fun watching them eat them. I mean, who knows which one the cat licked?

[Jack Armstrong]

All right, so there was a twist at the end there. Vocal fry lady explaining some hot dog recipe.

[Joe Getty]

She uses a vocal fryer apparently to cook her hot dogs.

[Jack Armstrong]

That's funny.

[Michael]

She added some cheese.

[Joe Getty]

Katie, you do it pretty well. It's like that. We. It's like that clip we play from louder Milkweezes.

[Michael]

How do you talk like that?

[Joe Getty]

How do you talk like that?

[Michael]

I just talk like this. So I guess the backstory there is she in the video, she throws one of the hot dogs on the floor. And then that's why at the end she goes, we'll find out which one the cat licked.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, you're pretty good at that. You could slip into that pretty easily.

[Jack Armstrong]

Person. Yeah, you're a terrible person. Yeah, that. That lady, I. I want not to be on. I won't do anything about it because, you know I abhor violence. But, Michael, do we have that louder milk clip? It's just so magical.

[Katie Green]

I do.

[Jack Armstrong]

The one I have, though.

[Katie]

It's a minute 14.

[Jack Armstrong]

Roll it.

[Joe Getty]

Let's see how much we like.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's worth it. I don't care if it's an hour 14. It's so, so great.

[Unknown]

What can I get you?

[Katie]

I'd like a large coffee.

[Unknown]

Okay. So hot coffee.

[Katie]

Hot coffee.

[Unknown]

Okay. Room for cream.

[Katie]

Totally leave room for cream.

[Unknown]

Why are you talking like that?

[Katie]

Why are you talking like that?

[Unknown]

Because this is my voice.

[Katie]

This is my.

[Unknown]

No, it's not. I heard you talking a minute ago. I know you don't talk like that.

[Katie]

Neither do you. Because nobody actually talks like this. You choose to talk like this. And today I chose to talk like this. It's pretty annoying, isn't it?

[Unknown]

Why are you so rude, man?

[Katie]

Just stop doing that.

[Unknown]

Can't help it. This is my voice.

[Katie]

No, it's not. It's an affectation that annoying teenagers and rich people use to sound like they don't give a. Except you work in a coffee shop, so I know you're not rich. And you don't look like a teenager unless you're Eunice Kennedy Shriver. Knock it off.

[Unknown]

So just because I talk like this means I don't give a. And what exactly am I supposed to not give a about?

[Katie]

That's an excellent question to ask yourself in your actual voice.

[Unknown]

Excuse me, some of us would like to order. You're total dick man.

[Jack Armstrong]

There.

[Katie]

There you go. Good, you're talking.

[Joe Getty]

That's a great question to ask yourself in your actual voice.

[Jack Armstrong]

I gotta go back to that show. I really enjoyed the handful of episodes. Oh, you know, we got something very important, some, something vital to the American scene to talk about, but just a small gripe mini rant I'm looking for, you know, the big show to watch and binge. Especially if it's something both my wife and I enjoy. But the, the show I'm watching, Severance, which got a fair amount of attention, it's executive produced by Ben Stiller, kind of sci fi ish, weirdish mystery ish thing, but it's, it's showing every sign of being the never ending story arc. The arc that doesn't arc every time it starts to get towards something like a conclusion, a revelation, they just introduce more red herrings than the rest of it. And I just. Maybe it's. Well, maybe it's me. Maybe it's. I don't have unlimited time for entertainment because I don't allow myself to. I limit it because I have stuff I want to do. You cannot string me along for the next five years of my life. A story arc. I mean, like Plato talked about that thousands of years ago. You're not allowed to perpetually. It's not an effing soap opera.

[Joe Getty]

You need a wedding, you need a death, you need a. You need a baby's being born, something. And then there you end.

[Jack Armstrong]

Who are the mysterious Harem Scarums? You got to tell me eventually. I'm not. I haven't signed. We're not married. I'm not here for life. I want to enjoy your show for a little while, then choose another one. And I don't know, I'm getting the idea that they're just gonna string this biatch along until nobody's watching anymore.

[Joe Getty]

So Loudermilk, if you've never seen it, is about a sober alcoholic. And I know a lot of sober alcoholics, and it is dead on. Because alcoholics were highly annoyed by the world, but drank to get through it. Now you don't drink anymore and you're still very annoyed with everybody in the world. And they're often very sarcastic like he is.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I admire your ability to do that. I'm still on Team Glug glug glug Speaking for myself. Let's see. We don't really have time to do topic A. We can do it after the. The break. Let's see. What could we do? You know, I'd love to get more into Columbia University and the poor beleaguered interim president trying to corral insane radical Marxist faculty. Good luck with that, sweetheart. Good luck. Not going well.

[Joe Getty]

I'm disappointed that today's national security hearing turned into an investigation of the chat thread and how a journalist ended up and did they disclose war plans and all that sort of stuff. That story, the big story of the day, because it was supposed to be the big national threats hearing that happens every single year, and I really like it. And, you know, a bunch of people get up there and say, hey, look, we're doing war games. We'll lose to China, or, you know, Russia's doing this, or what? You know, what do we need to be afraid of? I love that. And paying attention to that. So I hope they get to that at some point.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right, right. Not just partisan name calling and point scoring. Although this is a pretty good scandal. Scandals go in, you know, at least to some extent. So this is. This is the perfect length. I thought this was so good. You know the feeling. One minute you're into your date, their jokes land perfectly, their smile seems charming, and you're excited about seeing them again. Then, boom, they awkwardly sneeze. In a weird way, you've never seen someone sneeze and something in you just dies. Or they say a phrase that makes you cringe so hard you nearly pull a muscle. Suddenly you can't stand them. You've caught the ick.

[Joe Getty]

Wow. I don't think I've ever done that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Yeah. They're. They're talking about. It's. It's actually a scientific study from Azusa Pacific University.

[Joe Getty]

It's got to be more common for women to react that way than men to react that way, based on my experience, because I've known lots of women who said, yeah, I was really liking him. And then I sneezed. And they didn't say, God bless you. So that was it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Or, yeah, it's. It's Larry David personifying.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

Or I watched him cat man hands.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. I watched him cut his meat and I saw his fingernails were dirty. Dirty. So that was it. I liked everything else about him. Yes, Katie.

[Michael]

But yes, there was a guy that. I thought everything about him was great until we started texting and he could not do they. Or they're there there properly.

[Jack Armstrong]

And it was over You've made a good move, Katie. Yeah, good decision, bad grammar, it's over. So what's interesting about this study is they figured out your personality traits matter. People with high disgust sensitivity in a lot of different ways. Narciss or perfectionism are more likely to experience the ick in dating.

[Joe Getty]

I don't know, is she hot? She could have mentioned dog fighting. I'd be fine.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, obviously you don't have that high disgust sensitivity. That or it can be overcome, you know, by your. Your inner horn dog.

[Joe Getty]

Not as bad as being trapped in a homonym hell like Katie almost.

[Jack Armstrong]

Nick has real consequences. 68 of people had relationships and relationships after experiencing it, showing how small quirks can derail potential connections. And they think that in the past it used to be like your deep lizard brain saying, we should not breed. This person is not good as a mate, dangerous as a mate, whatever. But now it's. It can be triggered by really superficial modern social media type tendencies and habits in a way that's probably pretty stupid because it has nothing to do with your success as a couple. And they're trying to figure out, all right, is something gone wrong permanently or what?

[Joe Getty]

She could say, I had a dogfight fundraiser for the Harris Walls ticket and I'd say is Tuesday, you're free.

[Jack Armstrong]

Tuesday you're giving me the ick Now. Now here's something we can all tune into and be interested in. The science is a little vague, but the research team analyzed 86 popular TikTok videos about the ick to identify common triggers. Women frequently reported getting the ick when women displayed feminine behaviors, embarrassed themselves in public, or had annoying speech patterns. Men, meanwhile, reported aversion to women being overly trending, doing embarrassing things in public, or using irritating speech. It's very similar.

[Joe Getty]

I think it's interesting. The men using effeminate behavior of some sort, turning women off. That doesn't surprise me, but I wonder what particularly it is.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Yeah. Gosh, the poor young lads have been sold so hard on this idea of, you know, all masculinity is toxic. Masculinity. Be as effeminate as possible. Don't act like a dude. That's the worst thing you can do. Fellas, you were lied to by radical lunatics. Well, and your testosterone is low according to studies. So anyway, go box. Go box, somebody. Danger. Excitement. Athletic endeavors raise your testosterone levels.

[Michael]

Yes, I feel bad for the tick tock generation because I keep seeing these groups of like three to four guy friends that are all trying to look super hot, like boy band Ish. And they're lip syncing and dancing. And I will tell you right now, every girl that's watching that is running.

[Joe Getty]

Right.

[Michael]

Not good.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. So media portrays you that the whole androgynous thing, what was the term about Timothy Chalamet and noodle boys? That that's the attractive thing. It might be for some people, but I don't think it is for most women.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, that may be a weird but great example of the perception you get from the media versus reality in American society. So speaking of men and women, we've got a gender bending madness update. New science out as if it were necessary, pointing out that no dudes shouldn't be competing against girls in girls sports. You lunatics stay with us.

[Joe Getty]

And the Democrats are in bigger trouble than they even think holding, according to Ezra Klein of the New York Times. So stay tuned.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

So there have been a number of pieces written in the last week about the trouble the Democratic Party is in. Lowest approval rating it's ever had, and a lot of movers and shakers in the party saying they're the lowest they've been in a half century. Well, there's some data to back that up, according to lefties like Ezra Klein of the New York Times. They've got some details on that coming up. Really quite amazing. I don't know how long it'll take them to dig out of this.

[Jack Armstrong]

I can't imagine why they're reeling like they are having run a corpse and then a half wit for precedent in succession.

[Joe Getty]

A corpse and a half wit.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow. But hey, that's coming up in a moment or two. But first, it's time for a gender bending madness update. This one. Science based science. It's funny, this is a 8020 issue in America these days, but the Democratic Party, speaking of that fine institution, has had difficulty separating itself from its progressive wing on the issue. And apparently for the good of womankind and girls in sports in America and our souls, we need to keep fighting this fight. But in an effort to move beyond politics and focus on facts, indisputable facts, which are self evident to anybody with sanity, a new paper in Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews titled Evidence on Sex Differences in Sports Performance Performance has come out and offers a timely in depth look at the biological differences between males and females in sports. And it is written by a panel of experts in physiology and sports medicine and just ends the discussion. One of the paper's main findings challenges a popular argument made by some inclusion advocates that male athletes who block puberty before Adolescence can compete fairly against females. In reality, the evidence shows that meaningful performance differences between boys and girls exist even before puberty begins. And though they're smaller than the differences observed in adulthood, they are significant. And they, they just say, no, sorry, that's not good enough. If you're born and a boy, you play boy sports or you get in an open league, but you're not playing girl sports, period. Just for what it's worth, as a guy who coached youth sports, you know, pre pubescent and then as teenagers, but when I coached young kids, I would frequently be like the head coach of a boys soccer team and be assisting with a girls soccer team. And as I've said many times, the speed and violence with which 10 year old boys play sports compared to 10 year old girls is it's the difference between, you know, black and white, an elephant and a mouse. It is unmistakable. You watch for 30 seconds, it's unmistakable. Anyway, to this study they had, I think it's several different conclusions. Number one, males consistently outperform females in events dependent on strength, speed and endurance.

[Joe Getty]

No way.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I know. The performance gap between top male and female athletes ranges from about 10% over 40% depending on the sport. These are not random or anecdotal. They are consistent and grounded in biology.

[Joe Getty]

Wow. Which is only 10%.

[Jack Armstrong]

There are some women who can beat some men is frequently the idiotic non argument preferred by, you know, poor young people who've been indoctrinated into this stuff, honestly. Number two, the male female performance gap appears before puberty. Among elite pre puberty prepubescent athletes in the U.S. boys outperform girls by 3 to 10% in running and jumping events, up to 5% in swimming. Some of these differences may be influenced by behavioral factors such as greater participation by boys in various physical vigorous physical activity. Clear biological disparities are already present. Early hormonal influences, differences in muscle development, patterns of physical activity, et cetera. And this is all by the way supported by all sorts of great experts and it's peer reviewed and the rest of it.

[Joe Getty]

For some reason I was just thinking about the back when I used to be at the playground every single day, pick up my kids from school and they'd hang around, play in the playground. I never one time saw girls having like a stick fight where they each got two sticks and they're like sword fighting, right? Never one time where the boys were constantly doing it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Let me squeeze in the rest of the conclusions. 3. Puberty Dramatically Increases the performance gap that's already there. Boost speed, strength and endurance. Hearts, longer bones, more red blood cells, bigger lungs, et cetera, et cetera. Testosterone is the main driver of male athletic advantage but. And female physiology constrains athletic performance. I'd like to get into more detail on this, but we're running out of time. And testosterone suppression reduces but does not eliminate mal advantage at any age, at any level.

[Joe Getty]

That's the key right there.

[Jack Armstrong]

It diminishes it. It does not eliminate it. And finally, female doping with testosterone improves performance, but falls significantly Shorts of short of male levels. You can't turn a male into a female and you can't turn a female into a male transphobe.

[Joe Getty]

Sad.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty just. She inspires young people all over the country.

[Joe Getty]

Would you like to see her joining in the Senate?

[Jack Armstrong]

Right now we have, as I said, just a whole lot of people in the Congress. Okay, Jonathan, thanks. Wait, I got one more. I got one more.

[Joe Getty]

This is important.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, I asked you. Okay, you know you want to do nonsense, do nonsense. So as a cranky octogenarian socialist with a voice like an incontinent tuba, the party's future. Or is it aoc? And this isn't just about Republicans. We need a Democrat that fights harder for us too. I'm with her. If she thought gas stoves were a problem, she better not light a match near an 83 year old. Wow. Childish.

[Joe Getty]

So the only energy that's been seen out of the Democratic Party in recent months is the Bernie Sanders AOC tour, the oligarchs Stop the oligarchs tour, and this piece in Axios yesterday from Mike Allen, who is as plugged into the big time thinkers in the Democratic Party as anybody in America. And his headline was behind the Curtain, Dems Dark, deep hole. And again, this is from top Democrats. This is not Fox's view of things. This is people that want their party succeeds view of their own party. Top Democrats tell us the party is in the deepest toll it's been in in 50 years. And they fear things are going to get worse.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, worse than this.

[Joe Getty]

Which is a heck of a thing to say. And they go through some stuff that has been talked about a lot. They've got the lowest favorability rating that they've had maybe ever. No popular national leader currently has emerged. Supreme Court ain't changing anytime soon. To me, the biggest one, that is the biggest change. The dwindling influence over the media ecosystem. My whole life, all of our whole life, they dominated the big newspapers and the big TV shows were so much a part and they just don't matter anymore. Hardly at all.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. So even if you weren't particularly showing signs of life or regeneration, the media would say you were and continue to hammer the other side to pave the.

[Joe Getty]

Way or when that emerging star eventually comes, and they will. I just don't have the booster system that they used to have to reach everyone.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, a built in gigantic PR team.

[Joe Getty]

Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative according to all polls. This is why Democratic leaders think things are going to get worse. So I mentioned that earlier. But further on, Ezra Klein of the New York Times noted that if the current population patterns hold, and they probably will for at least five more years, Democrats will suffer a devastating blow after the 2030 census. The party will lose as many as a dozen House seats and electoral votes. A dozen in just five years.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, because of people's migration patterns. In essence, Americans, not illegal immigrants.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. So they'll be down a dozen House seats from where they are currently. And he points out, if that happens, and it probably will in the Electoral College, Democrats could win all of the states at Kamala Harris one, plus Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and still lose the White House. That's how much a difference it would make in close elections. Other things they point out, Democrats are losing working class voters, which was their bread and butter forever. That's according to Derek Thompson of the New Liberal Blueprint or some whatever that is. They're seeing their margins among non white voters erode and vanish. They're losing young voters. Something is wrong in the Democratic Party, says that strategist. By the Numbers. A deep, comprehensive poll by Democratic pollster David Shore, who gets a lot of attention because he's predicted a number of elections, did a study based on 26 million online responses. That's a thorough poll. That's not your polled 1000 people and extrapolated 26 million. Anyway, he said on Ezra Klein's podcast the other day that his most striking finding and the one most worrisome to him as a guy who wants Democrats to win is the surging pro Trump MAGA Republican views and voting patterns of young men, immigrants and anyone other than strident liberals. That that gets to the whole. Trump increased his vote in every single county, even the ones he lost. He did better than he did the last time around in the whole country.

[Jack Armstrong]

And in every demographic group except college educated white women, I think.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. So as it says here, other than strident liberals, which is highly educated women. So yeah, it's, it's surging to the right among really everybody. But strident liberals. And that number is small and not going to grow a lot because I never have kids, for one thing. Sure. This pollster estimates a 23 point swing against Democrats among immigrants. The swing is very pronounced among Hispanics who consider themselves conservatives. Democratic Support dropped by 50%. 5, 0.

[Jack Armstrong]

That's enormous. I mean, in your wildest dreams, if you're a Republican, you couldn't even hope for that.

[Joe Getty]

Right. So let it be a lesson for life that a lot of, a lot of things that you assume don't turn out to be true. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party, everybody's been assuming for my whole adult life that as the country got browner, the Democrats were going to maybe get into a position where they'd never lose another election. Turns out a lot of these Hispanic people decide, I'm not down with the liberal crap. I'm more of a conservative than a liberal.

[Jack Armstrong]

Speaking of David Shore, I don't know if you remember, I only half remember this. He was canceled by the Democrats and the progressives back in 2020 for going against the grain of the doctrine.

[Joe Getty]

Well, he was. He said something that was true and got canceled for it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, exactly. Yeah. But he. Continuing on with some of his data, he came to a really shocking conclusion. Trump would have won by a bigger margin if everyone had shown up to the polls. Quote, the reality is, if all registered voters had turned out, then Donald Trump would have won the popular vote by 5 points instead of the 1.7 points that he won by. There's long been an idea, an idea that Dems just need to get out the vote. But the truth for Democrats is that under no circumstances should the vote be gotten out anymore. And quoting Nellie Bowles of the Free Press, next cycle we will see rich ladies heading to the Philly suburbs to padlock people inside their homes. Celebrities will hold concerts hundreds of miles from the nearest polling place. Candidates will shake the hand of a working class man in Ohio and tell him the line to vote's longer than 10 minutes. Just call it good and go home.

[Joe Getty]

The rock the vote era is over, at least for the left.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right now. You'll see them saying, yeah, not only IDs required for voting, you should have two IDs. Yeah, yeah. Not having IDs discriminates against black people or something. Yeah, yeah. Make it harder to vote. There's only three minutes. The polls should be open on election day. That's it. Ah.

[Joe Getty]

I've got two more stunning pieces of information that if I was a Democrat, I'd think we're in bad shape and then I'll be done with this. This is really quite amazing.

[Jack Armstrong]

There you go. I'll be the judge of whether they're stunning or not.

[Joe Getty]

It's the rise of conservatism among young people, mainly men, that spooks him. The most young voters, regardless of race and gender, have become more Republican Director of research at Blue Blue Rose Research, told Axios that millennials were one of the most progressive generations in our nation's history. And it looks like Gen Z is about to be one of the most conservative that we've experienced in maybe 50 to 60 years.

[Jack Armstrong]

I, I've got to believe that's a reaction to the insane progressivism they've grown up seeing. And, and because kids aren't stupid, even if they're not like sophisticated in, in political analysis, they see the results of the policies that have been advocated around them in their lives, on the streets, in their towns, in their schools.

[Joe Getty]

This is a guy, this Shore guy. Again, he will use the data from 20, what was it, 23 million surveys. Gen Z is potentially the most conservative generation we've experienced in this country in 50 to 60 years. That is something, isn't it? You know what? Yeah, it's so obvious. I think you overplayed your freaking hand. And not only did you overplay your freaking hand as super progressives, you know it's unfair to label all Democrats like this because I know plenty of like your working class Democrats, they weren't down with all this crap. They didn't want to talk about boys and girls, sports and all this nonsense and latinx and pronouns and just all this nut job stuff. But anyway, you overplayed your hand and you had the media boosting you the whole time acting like everybody believed this crap. Oh, and then how about the George, the Summer of George Floyd. What did that do to the Generation Z? The school shutdowns, all this different stuff, Right?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. And again, the very small number of extremely vicious and ideologically extreme progressives who believe this stuff were amplified by the, you know, their brethren in the media to the point that everybody was cowed. Not everybody. Hello. So many people were cowed into obedience or not resisting thinking. Wow, I'm in the minority. I hear these messages that everybody either believes this or should every I'm being dragged into white people or evil training at my employer.

[Joe Getty]

Right?

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh my God. They, they capitalized on a moment in time so disproportionate to A, their numbers and B, any sanity God, I'm thinking, surrounding their crazy ass views. It's It's. It was amazing to have witnessed it. I hope it's on the back foot. And, boy, anybody who lost their career during that horrifying period of Black Lives Matter and the rest of it, oh, I ache for you.

[Joe Getty]

I'm thinking about my own kids, who are certainly more conservative than I was at that age. I never even thought about this sort of stuff, but I also didn't, you know, confront a whole bunch of weird sexual stuff in school that they don't want. And they were able. They've been able to figure out, you know, which party is for that and which is against it, or all the homeless people around in the park and whatever, which party allowed this and which party's against it. They figured that out.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right, right. All the crime and all the goods being locked up in the stores.

[Joe Getty]

Absolutely. Or the. How come we can't do this? Because we'll get sued. They're afraid we'll get sued. They know what party's behind that and what's not.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right? Right. I'm just picturing all the poor kids, and who knows what the numbers are. 80, 20, 70, 30. Who. When the teachers spouted the utterly horrific progressive neo Marxist doctrine at them in schools, the 15, 20%, 30% who are down with it shouted, yes, yes, that's right. And anybody who denies it is a racist and a bigot and horrible and will hurt them for you. And then the 70% of the kids just sitting there thinking, this is insane, but I don't dare say anything. I'm hoping, you know, as they reach adulthood, they express their distaste for that, you know, at the ballot box and are. And have found the courage to be vocal about it.

[Joe Getty]

I thought that was really some stunning information. So Millennials, one of the most progressive generations ever. Gen Z, the most conservative in a half century or more, for what it's worth.

[Jack Armstrong]

My oldest kid is 32 now going on 33. My youngest is 25.

[Joe Getty]

None of these numbers are possible. That can't be true.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, I know.

[Joe Getty]

Check that. Somebody should check that.

[Jack Armstrong]

I'm doing the math. Yeah. 25. Yeah. They grew up in a significantly different moment in time from each other. The beginning and heyday of the insanity versus the last couple innings of it, if you will. Baseball season's about to start. Very excited. Yeah. Wow. How interesting. Well, you know, I. During the worst of it, 2020, 21, the George Floyd riots, the mostly peaceful, fiery, murdery, looting, lawless, insane, and then.

[Joe Getty]

Trans kicked in right after that. The whole training thing.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, my God. Men Beating the hell out of women on sports fields because they called themselves a woman yesterday. That it, the stupidity of it bothers me more than the extremism of it. Yeah, yeah. During all of that, I really thought sanity has got to prevail. Reality has to bat last.

[Joe Getty]

I didn't think it would this fast.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, it ain't done yet, folks. Remember, the universities are still teaching this as fast as they can.

[Joe Getty]

Well, they're that tiny sliver, the insanity. Yeah, we'll finish strong.

[Jack Armstrong]

Next, Armstrong and Getty.

[Unknown]

Former University of Michigan assistant football coach Matthew Weiss in court facing federal hacking charges. Weiss is accused of targeting female athletes, downloading their intimate photos, and of taking notes commenting on their bodies and their sexual preferences, according to prosecutors. Prosecutors say over an eight year period, Weiss hacked into the database of more than 100 colleges and cracked the encryption protecting the passwords. If convicted, he could face decades in prison.

[Jack Armstrong]

There are half a dozen different angles you could take to that story.

[Joe Getty]

Kidding. What a nut job.

[Jack Armstrong]

With omnipresent porn. What is it about? Oh, these are real people who are not porn people. And I'm looking at their privets.

[Joe Getty]

So you're getting much like less access to see a human's body parts than you could get, you know, with a couple of clicks on your computer, as.

[Jack Armstrong]

Woody Allen used to say of pornography. And it's so poorly lit, it's just.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, but I guess because it's got to be some sort of power dynamic or.

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't know, it's, it's. I mean, anybody with a little experience in life, been around the block, knows the difference between porn and actual sex and sexual response is it's like the difference between looking at food and eating it. I mean, and I pity kids who are just think porn is love and life anyway.

[Joe Getty]

What? That they may be ruined for life on one of the most interesting and enjoyable aspects of it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, yeah, yeah. And the losing out on the bonding with another human being and the rest of it for both the boys and the girls. It's horrible. Oh yeah, 100%. Yeah. So you could look at that angle of sexual response. You could look at a guy who's that gifted with the computer arts and is living his dream career and decides to devote his expertise to and risk his career over that sexual need. It's just, wow, human beings are strange beasts. Especially this guy's a football coach. He's not the head coach, but he's a football coach. The University of Michigan, Right. You are atop Mount Everest, right?

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. That's weird.

[Katie]

Check Your clock.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's time to stop Jack and Joe. They've gotta go. And if they don't, you can. They'll be back tomorrow.

[Joe Getty]

Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew. There he is. Michelangelo, our technical director, directing us technically. Michael, what is your final thoughts?

[Katie]

Sir, earlier in the show, we were talking about robots doing medical procedures. What about them doing dentistry? They go to pull your teeth and maybe, you know, there's a malfunction and they pull out several by mistake.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. Or pull out your eyeballs or. I don't. Sure.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. This stuff's gonna happen.

[Jack Armstrong]

What the what? Katie Green, our esteemed newswoman, has a final thought. Katie, if you'd like to wash that.

[Michael]

Thought out of your brain, go to armstronggetty.com. check out Katie's Corner. I have the video of the baby Sopranos on there.

[Joe Getty]

It's very cute. If you have seen any of those very.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, okay. All right. Yeah, I gotta check it out. Jack, a final thought for us.

[Joe Getty]

So we're talking about how long will college sports last? You know, because things have changed a lot. March Madness is going on. For instance, this. Maryland's players were asked in the post game conference what makes Kevin Willard a coach worth listening to. And one of the players said, well, he do pay us the money.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, I did not think that's what you were going to say. I let my guard down and he hit me right in the bread basket. O doubled over. My final thought. And look, the whole using Snap, vine, chat, discord or whatever they're using, the legality of that, the wisdom of that, letting Jeffrey Goldberg in, that is probably bad and needs to be looked into. On the other hand, I'm looking at more and more examples of what was said by whom and when and how. And it's an incredibly balanced and respectful exchange of ideas among people who don't always agree with each other. And arriving at a policy and executing the President's foreign policy. It's a very healthy discussion.

[Joe Getty]

You're feeling like this is more of a scandal or less of a scandal than when we started.

[Jack Armstrong]

I think it'll go away pretty quickly.

[Joe Getty]

See you tomorrow. God bless America. Every single intelligence agency uses Armstrong and Getty is outrageous.

[Katie]

It's absolutely unthinkable.

[Jack Armstrong]

It's an embarrassment. This was a huge mistake.

[Joe Getty]

Correct?

[Jack Armstrong]

No.

[Katie]

Get the hell out of here.

[Joe Getty]

Whatever. Hold on to the truth. Are you. And to hope.

[Jack Armstrong]

Like when you say that like, you mean like the FBI.

[Joe Getty]

That was even dumber and more annoying than usual. I'm so sorry. Okay.

[Katie Green]

Cheers.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Gettysburg.