Like Juicy Steaks

Summary

Armstrong & Getty On Demand Episode: Like Juicy Steaks Release Date: July 21, 2025

In the Like Juicy Steaks episode of Armstrong & Getty On Demand, hosts Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty delve into a diverse array of topics, ranging from sports and economics to political controversies and scientific advancements. This detailed summary captures the essence of their engaging discussions, enriched with notable quotes and precise timestamps for a comprehensive overview.

---

1. WNBA Players' Financial Demands and Caitlin Clark's Impact

At the outset (00:30), Armstrong and Getty discuss the recent actions of WNBA players who sent a strong message to the league by wearing T-shirts emblazoned with "pay us what you owe us the game" during the All-Star Game. Joe Getty highlights the ensuing online chatter and connects the movement to the financial struggles of the WNBA, which reportedly lost around $50 million last season. He attributes the league's existence primarily to NBA subsidies, noting a historical lack of profitability independent of the NBA.

Jack Armstrong adds depth to the conversation by questioning the sustainability of the WNBA, referencing women's soccer as a potentially more profitable model. He critiques the league's image management strategies, suggesting that efforts to signal support for women may be more about virtue signaling than genuine moral commitment (02:00).

A pivotal point in the discussion is Caitlin Clark's influence on the league's visibility and attendance. Getty points out that Clark's popularity has led to increased ratings and average attendance figures across the country (03:35). Armstrong underscores the significance of her role, comparing her impact to that of Tiger Woods in golf, who similarly boosted the sport's popularity and financial standing (04:13).

---

2. US Economic Trends and Trade Relations

Transitioning to economics, Armstrong presents headlines from the Wall Street Journal, noting a resurgence in consumer spending amidst ongoing trade tensions with Europe (04:37). The hosts dissect the complexities of the US-European trade relationship, debating the likelihood and potential impact of a trade war initiated by tariff policies reminiscent of the Trump era.

Joe Getty expresses confusion over conflicting reports regarding the US's largest trading partners, citing Canada, Mexico, Europe, and China as contenders (05:57). Armstrong responds by highlighting the ambiguity in NBA's financial reporting of the WNBA, drawing parallels to the murky details surrounding international trade agreements (06:22).

The conversation shifts to the effects of Trump's tariff policies on everyday consumer goods. Armstrong cites a Wall Street Journal analysis revealing that Amazon has raised prices on approximately 2,500 items by 5% since the introduction of tariffs, contrasting this with Walmart's strategy of lowering prices on the same items (07:03). They mockingly reference Howard Lutnick's optimistic projections about the economy under Trump, showcasing skepticism towards his cheerleading remarks (09:53).

---

3. Media and Political Controversies: Tulsi Gabbard and Russiagate

The hosts then navigate the contentious realm of political scandals, focusing on Tulsi Gabbard's explosive claims regarding the Obama administration's alleged fabrication of Russiagate narratives (15:29). Getty questions the validity and sources of Gabbard's assertions, while Armstrong provides a brief overview of her allegations, linking them to historical events surrounding the 2016 election interference investigations (20:29).

They analyze the factual inconsistencies in Gabbard's statements, particularly the distinction between influencing an election and altering vote tallies. Matt Taibbi's critical perspectives are introduced, emphasizing the challenges in substantiating claims of widespread conspiracy without concrete evidence (27:10). Armstrong voices his reluctance to take Gabbard's claims at face value, labeling her as a "crackpot" while acknowledging the murky nature of the investigations (25:59).

---

4. Scientific Innovations in Health

Shifting to more positive news, Armstrong and Getty explore groundbreaking developments in medical science. They discuss a federally funded study examining the efficacy of new multi-cancer early detection blood tests capable of identifying genetic signatures associated with various cancers (15:59). The hosts ponder the practicality and potential frequency of such tests, debating the balance between early detection benefits and the invasiveness of frequent testing (17:09).

Additionally, they highlight research on dogs' abilities to detect Parkinson's disease through unique scent signatures emitted by patients' skin (17:39). This revelation underscores the innovative intersections between animal training and medical diagnostics, raising hope for future disease prevention and management strategies.

---

5. Tech Industry and AI: Elon Musk and Emerging Billionaires

Elon Musk's reflections on artificial intelligence take center stage as Getty brings up Musk's tweet expressing overwhelming AI existential dread (32:23). The hosts are intrigued by Musk's apprehensions, especially given his prominent role in advancing AI technologies (33:01).

The conversation then shifts to the inspiring story of Lucy Gao, who recently surpassed Taylor Swift as the youngest self-made female billionaire through her AI data labeling startup (34:18). Armstrong and Getty marvel at her work ethic, detailing her 90-hour workweeks and relentless dedication from a young age (34:50). They discuss the broader implications of AI in modern entrepreneurship, recognizing its pivotal role in creating new economic opportunities (35:34).

---

6. Closing Thoughts

Throughout the episode, Armstrong and Getty balance critical analysis with humor, offering listeners a nuanced perspective on each topic. They intertwine personal anecdotes and societal observations, making complex subjects accessible and engaging. The episode concludes with reflections on work ethics, cultural attitudes towards success, and the diverse paths individuals take to achieve their goals (38:43).

---

Notable Quotes:

• Jack Armstrong (00:30): "And now here's Armstrong and Getty."

• Joe Getty (00:47): "The All Stars warming up in these T-shirts last night that read pay us what you owe us the game."

• Jack Armstrong (02:48): "It's like buying carbon credits or something."

• Joe Getty (04:54): "Major league shortstop makes $40 million a year when a school teacher makes $80,000."

• Howard Lutnick (09:14): "Next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books."

• Tulsi Gabbard (20:29): "This is an issue with such significant impact that it should concern American because it has to do with the fabric and integrity of our Democratic Republic."

• Matt Taibbi (27:10): "It's not so much what the PDB did say, it's what it didn't say."

• Joe Getty (33:08): "How much he's working now SpaceX and Tesla... He's back to working seven days a week and sleeping in his office whenever his kids are away."

---

This episode of Armstrong & Getty On Demand offers a compelling mix of current events, critical analysis, and insightful commentary, making it a must-listen for those seeking depth and diversity in podcast content.

Transcript

[Jack Armstrong]

This is an iHeart podcast broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

[Joe Getty]

Armstrong and Getty.

[Jack Armstrong]

And now here's Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

WNDA players are sending a very frank.

[Jack Armstrong]

Message to the league during a very pivotal time.

[Joe Getty]

The All Stars warming up in these T shirts last night that read pay us what you owe us the game. Later drawing chance from fans echoing pay them.

[Unknown]

This comes amid negotiations.

[Joe Getty]

All we really need out of that. So the WNBA players came out on the court for their All Star Game, which I did not see wearing shirts that said play us what you pay us what you owe us. And that caused a lot of online chatter is that sort of thing. Will a lot of people pointing out the roughly $50 million the league lost most recent season according to the NBA, which owns the WNBA. The WNBA is supported by. Only exists really because of the NBA financially subsidized by. Yeah, others are claiming that all that math has changed since Caitlin Clark came in. And they're ratings are up. The average attendance is up all across the country. I don't have any idea the numbers of that. But at least historically it has been a league that would not exist on its own if somebody. If the NBA wasn't for some reason thinking it's in their best interest to have a woman's version out there. There's not enough of an appetite to make it a. A profitable business, at least in the past.

[Jack Armstrong]

Two main motivations in doing that is far as I've been able to gather. Number one, it's a decent idea because like women's soccer is pretty big and. And profitable and they thought maybe there's a market for this. The second thing is they are a league that has had problems with guys who don't treat women very well. Oh, and especially during the hashtag me too era when it was for that two and a half years or whatever it was, you had to desperately signal that you were good with women and up with women and down with domestic violence and rape and the rest of it. And aren't we all. I'm differentiating frantic virtue signaling with actual morals. That's. That's part of it. They just thought it was really good for their image points. It was like buying carbon credits or something.

[Joe Getty]

As I was just reading one article preparing for this. Apparently the NBA purposefully makes the books on this pretty murky. So it's pretty difficult to figure out how much they subsidize and how much money the WNBA makes or doesn't or whatever. But it is worth pointing out that the players in their voting for other players on the All Star team had Caitlin Clark at ninth. You're out there wearing shirts for the All Star Game. It says, pay us what are worth. If you get a raise, it's because of Caitlin Clark. I mean, so I don't. Wouldn't be hating on her too much.

[Jack Armstrong]

Stadium was full for the All Star Game, Jack. Do you know where it was held?

[Joe Getty]

I'm guessing. Guessing where she plays, right?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Coincidence. That's kind of funny, isn't it? Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

I mean, you don't have to like her, I suppose, but you ought to realize that if you make more money, she's entirely the reason.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right.

[Joe Getty]

And that might not be fair, of course, but, you know, where does fair come into entertainment?

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, for instance, as I just spent an unholy amount of time watching the British Open or the Open Championship as we prefer to call it in the golf world over the weekend. Tiger woods was a prick. But every single guy with a golf club in his hands playing on tv. TV will tell you, oh man, our sport just exploded because of Tiger. We're all making a hell of a lot more money because of Tiger.

[Joe Getty]

Oh, yeah, back in the day I would have watched. I would have known the tournament was on this weekend. I didn't and would have watched some if Tiger was playing because. Because it would have pulled in people like me.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, exactly. Anyway, coming up later, I was. I was gonna. I've got a bunch of economic, like kitchen table, you know, economic dollars and cents stories to touch on real quickly.

[Joe Getty]

That's why I wanted to do this. Getting into it, the, the Caitlin Clark thing. It's just because it's always. It's almost so many things are not presented as a dollar and cents sort of way. It's got nothing to do with fairness or whether women deserve a platform of blah, blah, blah. None of that has anything to do with anything.

[Jack Armstrong]

Major league shortstop makes $40 million a year when a school teacher makes 80,000. Yeah, that's correct. That's absolutely correct. And that's precisely the way it should be anyway, unless we as a society decide to reprioritize. But we haven't. Anyway, so a couple of things worth noting, economically speaking. Here's a little AB for you. Headline A from the Wall Journal. The US economy is regaining its swagger. Consumer spending again. Consumers spending again after spring's tariff chill. But some expect growth to be slow. But there doesn't seem anything, it seem to be anything that can slow down the economy Then this headline, it's like the next story. Europe prepares for a U.S. trade fight. We're about to start a trade war with our biggest trading partner over Trump's whole tariff thing and then trade imbalances and the rest of it. And although in his defense, Europe is had very, very one sided in their favor rules and regs about trading with.

[Joe Getty]

The US it does confuse me somewhat that I feel like I've heard five to 10 different entities are our biggest trading partner. That stat seems to get thrown around a lot. Canada, our biggest trading partner. Mexico, our biggest trading partner. Europe, our biggest trading partner. China, our biggest trading partner. I don't know if it's just like which version you use of the way you slice it. I don't know.

[Jack Armstrong]

That's an interesting thought. Yeah, yeah. So one of the points that they make in the second article about the alleged trade war is that nobody's really sure if any of this stuff is ever going to happen. The tariffs and the trade wars and the, the sturm and drong and, and as markets tend to do they get used to things, there's a more technical term for that. But now they're like, oh yeah, Trump's shooting off his mouth about a trade war again. Huh? Interesting. What do you want to have for lunch? In a way that, you know, six months ago people went nuts and then finally this. I thought this was really interesting now, not a political thing because I don't care. Yeah, go ahead.

[Joe Getty]

Olutnik, his main spokesman on the whole thing.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, Lutnick. Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

Howard Lutnick was on one of the shows yesterday and I should have had Hanson grab the quote. He said something like in the next two weeks, Americans are going to see the best something or other they've ever seen in their lives. Economy or business climate or stock market or something. But anyway, he's claiming in the next two weeks we're gonna, it's gonna be the most amazing you've ever seen in your life. Okay, cool.

[Jack Armstrong]

That's true. On the heels of the 90 deals in 90 days and there was like one and a half.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

Show me. Don't tell me. And then this. And again, I'm not trying to make any point. I just found it interesting. It's a entirely economic strategy. Here's it, for instance, in January, a Campbell's New England clam chowder can of soup cost less than 2 bucks on Amazon.

[Joe Getty]

A can of. So you're ordering your clam soup on Amazon to have delivered right to your door. What a time to be al. What A great country and it's less than two bucks.

[Jack Armstrong]

And you can be in a part of the country where you haven't seen a clam since, you know, but you can get it delivered to your door the next day, maybe the same day. And this month that same soup cost 260 on Amazon, a 30% increase. In the five months since President Trump first announced sweeping tariffs, Amazon has quietly raised prices on low cost products, a bunch of them, deodorant, protein shakes, pet care items, blah blah, blah. Wall street journal analysis. Near 2500 items found on average, prices on inexpensive goods increased 5% by July. So it's not a ton, but it's some. In April, Amazon said they would hold the line on prices, but indeed they have raised them on thousands and thousands of items. Walmart lowered prices on the same Items by nearly 2%.

[Joe Getty]

Okay, what's going items, what's going on there?

[Jack Armstrong]

Different business strategies.

[Joe Getty]

Here's what Lutnick said. How do you reverse public opposition?

[Howard Lutnick]

Oh, they're going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing. I mean they're just going to love them. You know, the President figured out the right answer and sent letters to these countries, said this is going to fix the trade deficit. This will go a long way to fixing the trade deficit. And that's gotten these countries to the table and they're going to open their markets or they're going to pay the tariff. And if the they open their markets, the opportunity for Americans to export, to grow their business. Farmers, ranchers, fishermen. This is going to be the next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books. President Trump is going to deliver for the American people.

[Joe Getty]

Next two weeks are going to be weeks for the record books.

[Jack Armstrong]

I hope it's true. As juicy as Trump steaks. That's right. It's going to be fabulous. Why? That was just cheerleading. Stop it.

[Joe Getty]

Why'd you need to do that?

[Jack Armstrong]

Because I'm a realist. I demand realism.

[Joe Getty]

I think you should put on your Trump shoes and walk that back.

[Jack Armstrong]

Take a look at my Trump watch. It's not running. That's odd. So here's, here's one of the difficulties in speaking of these things quickly. It reminds me of the end of last hour. Jack said something about the Epstein thing and I said, well, it depends what you mean by the Epstein thing. As we were discussing last week, there are many different sizes. You can order of the Epstein quote unquote conspiracy. Some are very modest, fact based. This guy was a perv. He was getting underage Girls for other pervs. Who are they? Why have so few charges been filed? That is a perfectly reasonable, fairly conservative way to look at it. Then you got your full blown. The Jews are running a worldwide sex pizza under see Hollywood driven sex cabal thing. That's a different version of the Epstein thing. When you're talking about the tariffs and the trade wars and the agreements, you almost have to talk about every country or every set of countries differently because it's absolutely true. Europe has all sorts of trade barriers against us that are the legacy of the post WW2 era when they were decimated and. And we were smart to help them grow their economies so they would become customers again and become trading partners again and allies worth having again. That was smart. It needs to end now. The only reason their economies are weak is because they're socialists and we've been defending them against foreign adversaries for the last 75 years. Having said all that, the whole trade deficit thing is just silly. That's not a problem, except in very rare cases. Here's a for instance. This is another Trump is silly thing. Sorry, I'm piling on a bit. I love what he's done on the border and cleaning up the woke in the universities couldn't love it anymore. But this stuff is just silly.

[Joe Getty]

Love that the Oval Office now looks like a Chinese restaurant.

[Jack Armstrong]

Absolutely. Finally. So Trump announced last week that he's ordered Coca Cola to put cane sugar.

[Joe Getty]

That's right. Finally. That's what I.

[Jack Armstrong]

Instead of high fructose corn, the issue I voted on. Yeah. And here's the problem, though. We have a huge shortage of sugar in this country. We don't produce nearly as much as we eat because we're a fat, fat people. We produce about 4 million tons of cane sugar. 4 million. We consume 12 and a half million. Wow. The rest is made up by imports and sugar sourced from sugar beets, which is a little bit different. And so we would have to have an enormous increase in sugar imports from Brazil and Mexico. Okay. Those are countries that face Trump administration tariffs of 50 and 30% respectively, on August 1, allegedly. So your Coke would be about $3.50 for one thing. And secondly, all of a sudden, out of nowhere, we would have enormous trade deficits because they have something we want that doesn't hurt us. My grocery. I have an enormous trade deficit with my grocery store. I give them way more money than they give me. I can't. In fact, I can't find any record of them giving me any money. But that money filters its way through the economy into my pocket and it's fine. So it's just, it's a silly way of looking at it.

[Joe Getty]

I was in the pocket of big sugar or something.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I just, I. I don't get his strategy. Maybe it's just his. His I'm crazy hard ball and it yields great agreements. I hope that's the case.

[Joe Getty]

It may be getting a pet psychic would help your dog's life. Also, want to be a billionaire? Work 90 hours a week. That's the answer, among other things. On the way.

[Unknown]

Armstrong and Gettys Tired of spills and stains on your sofa? WashablesOfAs.com has your back. Featuring the Annabe Collection, the only designer sofa that's machine washable inside and out. Where designer quality meets budget friendly prices. That's right, sofas start at just $699. Enjoy a no risk experience with pet friendly stain resistant and changeable slipcovers made with performance fabrics. Experience cloud like comfort with high resilience foam that's hypoallergenic and never needs fluffing. The sturdy steel frame ensures longevity and the modular pieces can be rearranged anytime. Check out washablesofas.com and get up to 60% off your Anna Bay sofa backed by a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not absolutely in love, send it back for a full refund. No return, shipping or restocking fees. Every penny back. Upgrade [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Jack Armstrong]

DBS announced they are indeed ending the late night comedy show the Late show with Stephen Colbert next year. Jimmy Kimmel blasted the decision with a foul mouth post on Instagram. He would have done it on his show, but he wanted people to see it.

[Joe Getty]

That's kind of funny.

[Jack Armstrong]

Wow.

[Joe Getty]

So Tulsi Gabbard, the skunk striped National Security National Director of Intelligence or whatever she is, made some explosive claims yesterday about information she has about the Obama administration purposefully fabricating stuff about Russiagate, et cetera, et cetera.

[Jack Armstrong]

That Barry himself, if true, would be.

[Joe Getty]

A really big deal. So we'll explain that coming up.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yep, indeed, a couple of really cool stories from the world of science. One being that and I became aware of this because a friend is involved in this. But can new blood tests really detect cancer early? A federally funded study will research whether a new generation of cancer blood tests are ready for patients. It's a big giant study. Yeah. These multi cancer multi cancer early detection tests are designed to flag the errant genetic signatures of more than a dozen cancers.

[Joe Getty]

Wow.

[Jack Armstrong]

Some doctors and medical practices are already using them.

[Joe Getty]

How often do you think we'd be jabbing ourselves? Would we start doing it at home? Because it's. So we're going in like every. How often would you do it?

[Jack Armstrong]

Probably every couple of years would be enough, right?

[Joe Getty]

No. God, no. When I got, when I had my cancer, I asked him, how long do you think I had this? They said it could have been nine months or it could have been a couple of weeks. Depends on how fast it grew. But yeah, I think you'd have to go in every month or you'd want to if you could catch this achievement.

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't want to get jabbed every month either. But yeah, I wonder, you know, obviously we're way early to be discussing that with any, you know, authority, but I wonder how expensive the test will be or, you know, because some things are much more, you know, expensive than others in the world of blood testing. And the other interesting story is they're making finding out more and more about dog's ability to actually smell that somebody has Parkinson's disease.

[Joe Getty]

Wow.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

They can smell cancer. That's been known for quite some time.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Parkinson's causes changes in your skin and has a unique scent signature linked to the disease. And you know, the dogs. Let's see, what was their actual success rate? Up to 80% sensitivity and 98% by sniffing skin swabs. But in the field, it's more like 80% in the early testing. So I mean that between the blood tests and like dogs, might we be able to nip these dread diseases in the bud in the future? That'd be amazing.

[Joe Getty]

What Tulsi Gabbard. Well, that was rough. Tulsi Gabbard claims she has Armstrong and Getty.

[Unknown]

Life's messy. We're talking spills, stains, pets and kids. But with Annabe, you never have to stress about messes again. @washablesofas.com Discover Annabe sofas. The only fully machine washable sofas inside and out. Starting at just $699. Made with liquid and stain resistant fabrics, that means fewer stains and more peace of mind. Designed for real life, Our sofas feature changeable fabric covers allowing you to refresh your style anytime. Need flexibility? Our modular design lets you rearrange your sofa effortlessly. Perfect for cozy apartments or spacious homes. Plus, they're earth friendly and and built to last. That's why over 200,000 happy customers have made the switch. Upgrade your space today. Visit washablesofas.com now and bring home a sofa made for life. That's washablesofas.com offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Jack Armstrong]

Fuzz on this. Whatsoever the Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle, they did it with purpose. They did it with sophistication. They did it with overwhelming technical efforts. The great James Comey, the hero of every story he ever tells, or they.

[Joe Getty]

Did not a whole lot other than run a bunch of Facebook ads, which is ultimately kind of everything they found for the most part.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. Well, interestingly enough, over the weekend, Tulsi Gabbard, the dni, made a statement that we're about to play, essentially saying Barack Obama was intimately involved in the Russian collusion hoax and everything that flowed from it, and that when I'll let her speak, but that the cast of characters, those names we know, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, et cetera, they are all in on it. And indeed it is criminal what they did. Here is Ms. Gabbard.

[Tulsi Gabbard]

It's not a Democrat or Republican issue. This is an issue with such significant impact that it should concern American because it has to do with the fabric and integrity of our Democratic Republic. There was a Mueller investigation that went on for years, cost taxpayers nearly $40 million. There were two congressional impeachments. President Trump and almost every member of his family were smeared and attacked, faced lawsuits, depositions, high level officials were investigated. Foundational to it all was the fact that we had in President Obama and his leadership team people who did not want to accept the will of the American people in electing Donald Trump in 2016 and therefore cooked up this treasonous conspiracy to again try to effectively, and they did effectively launch a years long coup against the sitting president, United States.

[Joe Getty]

I didn't see the interview with her. Where did she come up with new information?

[Jack Armstrong]

I just think it's continuing to dig after months of investigation into this matter.

[Joe Getty]

She says, yeah, Trump's only been president for six months and there's been no way to look into it. A new since 2020.

[Jack Armstrong]

I'm scanning her statement real quickly. The long and short of what she says is that there is overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how after Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his National Security Cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years long coup against the president. And she goes into a fair amount of detail.

[Joe Getty]

Now, I'm pretty jaded on this sort of stuff and I come by it honestly. I think in that for instance, the whole Russia hoax, all kinds of people, including my current senator, uh, Adam Schiff, claimed all kinds of crap for years that they just did not have and, and have paid no price for not having it. Then you got James Comer on the Republican side claiming all kinds of crap that he apparently has not had in a couple of different things recently. And I don't have a lot of faith in Tulsi Gabbard. I do have a fair amount of faith in Matt Taibbi though. He is the leading non right wing journalist on being upset about the Russia hoax. He hates Trump. He's a lefty if he's anything, but he hates being lied to by the government more than anything else. And he has believed the whole Russia thing was nonsense from the beginning and has been writing about this for the Rolling Stone and others. And I guess now he's a substack guy. This is what he tweeted out today, though. Barack Obama now squarely in the Russiagate crosshairs. Former President Obama is now at the center square of the investigation and documents suggest his legacy, maybe even his freedom, are in jeopardy, writes Matt Taibi. I mean, according to the documents that are out, that's a hell of a thing to say.

[Jack Armstrong]

Here's a very basic fact outline that is the spine of this whole thing. So in the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the intelligence community consistently assessed that Russia is probably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means. And In December of 2016, after the election, after the election, talking points were prepared for DNI James Clapper stating, quote, foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks, cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the US presidential election outcome. On December 9, 2016, President Obama's white House gathered top National Security Council principles for a meeting that included Clapper and Brendan and rice and Kerry, etc. After the meeting, DNI, Clapper's executive assistant, sent an email to intelligence community leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment per the President's request. That's a quote, that details, quote, the tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election. It went on to say, odni will lead this effort with participation from the various agencies there. There's a problem there. And, and various folks have called Tulsi Gabbard on it. I don't want to prejudge because like Matt Taibbi, I, I agree it was so dirty and deliberate and so many people were in on it. Whether it crossed the bounds into lawlessness, I don't know, but it's worth pursuing. But the first statement was about Russia is not trying to influence the election by using cyber means, literally hacking into the systems. And then the second thing, at Obama's request is tools Moscow used in actions it took to influence the 2016 election. Those are two different questions. And so is this just sloppy? Is it equivocating the two things? I don't know. I'll tell you this. I am absolutely unwilling to say, look at Tulsi Gabbard. Those two things are different. She's a crackpot. Never mind. I mean. Cause it was so dirty and deliberate and unfair and probably illegal. Well, certainly the faking up of the FISA warrants over and over again in the ways we've discussed through the years, that was despicable.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. And you know, it's the same crowd that went out of their way to present Hunter's laptop as a ridiculous story when they knew it was a real story. They knew it was real. So it's the same people doing the.

[Jack Armstrong]

Same things in the same direction. Does it really stretch the credulity that much to think Obama was in on those conversations or even, you know, ran it? And if it wasn't Obama, that's fine. I don't have Obama obsession syndrome.

[Joe Getty]

No, it doesn't go to him at all. The, the, all the other people, if they did it on their own, need to pay a price.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right? Yeah, I would agree.

[Joe Getty]

I just have always assumed with Obama mostly, I mean, this is not like a charitable view of him really. It's just that I just voice thought he's just so into himself and he was at the end of a two term presidency. Like I just can't imagine him caring enough.

[Jack Armstrong]

We've got a couple of Matt Taibbi quote clips here. Sure. Talking to Bill Hemmer on Fox News. Go ahead with 47. Michael, why wasn't there more urgency on this and Trump 1.0 as there is now?

[Matt Taibbi]

Yeah, that's a complaint. I heard a lot over the weekend from people who have been following this and even from former officials who are close to Trump there. One of them said to me, a former high ranking Trump official said there was, quote, so much corruption in the last Trump presidency that this shouldn't have been overlooked, that these documents should have come out. Absolutely. But the overall sense I get is that everyone's happy that they finally are coming out and they're looking forward to what is likely to come out this week.

[Joe Getty]

Matt Taibbi is a guy as a lefty, he has Been one of the people screaming, hey, liberals, we're the people that are supposed to be like, really worried about the CIA and the NSA and the FBI. We're the ones that's our lane to think that the FBI is somebody we should be scared of. And they all cooked something up to take down a presidency. Shouldn't we as liberals be worried about this?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, a lot of what motivates him is personal disgust that, yeah, the lefty media started lionizing Clapper and Comey and all these people the minute they were opposing Trump. And he's like, wait a minute, these are the spooks and the guys who ignore the Constitution and. And the Fourth Amendment means nothing to them with their illeg searches. And now they're your buddies.

[Joe Getty]

Left the America and cooked up the Iraq war in his mind.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. Here's another Taibi clip. Is the allegation they were trying to influence our election or is the allegation that they actually change votes? I think we need to be clear on that. What can we say?

[Matt Taibbi]

So it's both. The Democrats are making a lot of hay over this apples and oranges issue that there was never any question about that they didn't actually change vote tallies, but they did influence the election. Actually, there was some question about whether they had the ability to influence the election. There were quotes earlier from that, from that year with the FBI saying they didn't have any evidence that they had done so and they were uncomfortable making that statement there. There were also quotes saying that they lacked evidence that Russia was. Had. Had the ability to outcome. Impact the outcome of the election. So all of this would have been passed on to somebody like Michael Flynn, because presidents elect are entitled to receive the Presidential Daily Briefing. That's why this is important. It's not so much what the PDB did say, it's what it didn't say. It didn't say that there was a sweeping conspiracy to help Trump. And if they had that, it would have been a very different political picture going forward.

[Joe Getty]

Okay.

[Jack Armstrong]

I got to admit my overall sense of this is it's going to be really hard to nail down. There are just too many slippery facts and plausible deniability encounters in the rest of it. I think it's well worth looking into because it was a disgusting chapter from.

[Joe Getty]

People who for a living do slippery things that are hard to nail down in other countries. So.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, and one counterfactual or alternate history that we'll never be able to witness in reality is if Trump hadn't been beset by that whole Russian collusion hoax his whole first term. How would that have changed his actions, policies, just his demeanor, everything. Right.

[Joe Getty]

And the first impeachment probably wouldn't have happened. And then the second, I mean, you don't know if January 6th, you don't know if he'd have won. So yeah, it's hard to say how it affected things.

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, right. And even having lost the whole January 6 thing was I think to some extent Trump refusing to stand up for the so called institutions of our society in a way that I would have appreciated on that day because he was so disgusted with how dishonest they had been about him and his administration for a very long time. I'm not excusing it, but I think.

[Joe Getty]

I understand it with nobody paying a price at all.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right? Exactly.

[Joe Getty]

You want to be a billionaire? Work 90 hours a week. Among other things to tell you Coming up. Stay here.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty.

[Unknown]

Time for a sofa upgrade. Visit washablesofas.com and discover Annabe where designer style meets budget friendly prices. With sofas starting at $699, Annabe brings you the ultimate in furniture innovation with a modular design design that allows you to rearrange your space effortlessly. Perfect for both small and large spaces. Anime is the only machine washable sofa inside and out. Say goodbye to stains and messes with liquid and stain resistant fabrics that make cleaning easy. Liquid simply slides right off. Designed for custom comfort, our high resilience foam lets you choose between a sink in feel or a supportive memory foam blend. Plus our pet friendly stain resistant fabric ensure your sofa stays beautiful for years. Don't compromise quality for price. Visit washablesofas.com to upgrade your living space today with no risk returns and a 30 day money back guarantee. Get up to 60% off plus free shipping and free returns. Shop now at washablesofas.com Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Joe Getty]

The Kiss Cam Coldplay story continues to entertain people with new information. The guy had to quit. They're both insanely wealthy. We'll get into that in our three and what Coldplay is saying in their concerts now. All entertaining. So Elon Musk tweeted this out on his own platform over the weekend, which I thought was interesting. All it said was at times AI existential dread is overwhelming. Well, I thought that from a guy who's building one of the top AI machines in the world and knows more about it than the average human. I find that a little scary.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I've got a great chat. GPT Story in which it has admitted chat GPT has admitted I failed but.

[Joe Getty]

On a different topic from Elon Musk. He did an interview over the weekend with looked like it was. Which one is it? Axios? Politico. One of them. Anyway. Talked about how much he's working now SpaceX and Tesla and he said he's back to. He had tweeted out he's back to working seven days a week and sleeping in his office whenever his kids are away. I don't know, whatever. Whenever his kids away means when you have 14 kids, different women, different places, but working seven days a week. And he his quote was for an interview was seven days a week sleeping in the factory. No one should put this many hours into work. This is not good. This is painful. It hurts my brain. It hurts my heart. That's an interesting thing to say. It hurts your brain and it's hurts your heart and nobody should do this but you're doing it. Okay. I'm not exactly sure what that means. Which leads me to this. A different billionaire who I'd never heard of. How did Lucy go? G U O. I don't speak Chinese. Would you pronounce that Gao. Go. I'm gonna say go.

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't know.

[Joe Getty]

How did Lucy go? Dethrone. Dethrone Taylor Swift as the youngest sel self made female billionaire in the world. Act broke, stay rich she said is one of her keys. But she's 30 years old. Recently dethroning Taylor Swift as the youngest self made billionaire on the planet. She did it with an and some sort of AI data labeling startup. I don't even understand what it was that she did but it's involving artificial intelligence.

[Jack Armstrong]

You gotta label your data. Everybody knows that the quickest way to.

[Joe Getty]

Become a billionaire or have a stock reach $4 trillion or whatever is be involved in AI in the modern world. That's for certain. Anyway, this is the stuff I thought that was very interesting. She started this when she was 21. She left a couple of years later. But she still has enough control in the company that she became a billionaire at age 30. The coder turned founder still clocks 90 hour work weeks with a schedule that starts at 5:30am and ends at midnight every day. She credits her no sleep DNA to her parents that she just doesn't need much sleep. Her parents were Chinese immigrants who worked as engineers in San Francisco Bay Area and instilled into a you know, strong work ethic.

[Jack Armstrong]

Working every day from 5:30am to midnight. Kill me.

[Joe Getty]

Right? The, the. The fast talking trailblazer doesn't believe in wasting time. I did like this part. She said, well, I don't watch TV or scroll TikTok. So that gives me many extra hours a day. That's true. I mean, you know, you also have to worry about going crazy by never doing anything. That's recreation. But if you eliminate, I mean, because there's certain stuff we all should eliminate, it's just a waste of freaking time. I mean, even if you feel like you need to rest, there's better ways to rest than scrolling. TikTok. Yeah, but he said that gives me many extra hours in a day. I'm constantly on the go. Whereas a lot of people build in relaxation time, I do not. I do fill in my schedule with some stuff. Like at 10pm Sometimes I'll go to dinner with friends. Um, we're not all built to work 90 hour weeks.

[Jack Armstrong]

She calls me at 10pm hey, you want to grab a bite? I'm like, what the hell?

[Joe Getty]

I'm gonna sleep.

[Jack Armstrong]

I'm getting bum in bed.

[Joe Getty]

I only answered the phone because I thought you were in a car wreck or something. You want to go eat? So two things on this that struck me. One, I don't want to go counter to the narrative that, you know, to a certain extent, if you can dream it, you can do it. I mean, you can be successful just like anyone else, which is true. But a lot of, like pro athletes or tech billionaires or whatever are just built differently than you are or I am. They're just built differently. Their minds work differently or their bodies work differently, and it's just, you know, good for them or bad for them or whatever. But I'm not built to work 90 hours a week, all day long without doing anything else. I'd go crazy. I don't want to do that. And, you know, I'm not built to be insanely competitive about one particular tiny aspect of the world, like a specific sport or a music instrument or something like that. I'm just not. Also though the other side of it is the whole, why do some immigrants come to this country and think, wow, what an opportunity. If I work my off, I can become wealthy in this country. And some people come to this country or some people who are born in this country with the idea that I'm not rich already having done nothing, and I'm going to blame others in the government and, and, and riot in the streets to get mine. What is that, parenting school?

[Jack Armstrong]

I think a lot of it's probably genetics.

[Joe Getty]

The attitude. No, the attitude's not genetics. The attitude of, I'm not rich yet, it's somebody else's fault. I don't think it's genetics.

[Jack Armstrong]

No, probably not. Although, I don't. I don't know. It's a. It's a complicated question. We have no time. Uh, but, yeah, I think a lot of its upbringing are culture. I mean, you have cultures, for instance, communist cultures, where being a go getter didn't do you any good. Kissing the ass of the authorities and scamming the system did you good. So, yeah, becomes part of your.

[Joe Getty]

Well, if you grew up surrounded by parents and say, this is a country where you can get wealthy, or you grow up with parents saying, this is a country where you're being screwed by the rich, those are two very different things.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty. This is an iHeart podcast.