Monkey Drunk!

Summary

Armstrong & Getty On Demand: "Monkey Drunk!" – Detailed Summary

Release Date: April 23, 2025

In the "Monkey Drunk!" episode of the Armstrong & Getty On Demand podcast, hosts Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty delve into a myriad of pressing societal and political issues, spiced with their characteristic humor and candid discourse. The episode features a notable guest, Larry Goodman—a retired Superior Court judge from Alameda County, California, and father to Katie—to provide legal insights into contemporary justice system challenges. The conversation traverses topics from corporate struggles and political tribalism to educational controversies and even touches upon intriguing scientific observations in the animal kingdom.

---

1. Tesla's Financial Struggles and Elon Musk's Political Involvement

The episode kicks off with a discussion on Tesla's declining profits, which have plunged by an alarming 71% in the first quarter of the year. This downturn is attributed in part to Elon Musk's significant role in the Trump administration, diverting his focus from Tesla to political endeavors.

Jack Armstrong highlights the issue:

"Tesla announcing its profits have plunged a staggering 71% in the first quarter of this year since CEO Elon Musk took major role in the Trump administration." [00:02]

The hosts express concern over the intertwining of corporate leadership and political involvement, questioning the long-term impacts on Tesla's performance and market position.

---

2. Tribalism and Judicial Inequities in America

A significant portion of the conversation centers on the increasing tribalism in American society, particularly how legal systems exhibit biases that undermine the principle of equal treatment under the law. The hosts lament the apparent two-tiered justice system where political affiliations influence prosecution outcomes.

Joe Getty critiques the current judicial approach:

"There's a two-tiered system of justice. If you're on our side, you get prosecuted and if you're on their side, you don't." [02:37]

They discuss a specific case involving a Democratic activist in Minnesota who inflicted over $21,000 in damages to Tesla vehicles. Despite clear evidence linking him to the vandalism, the prosecutor opted to place him in a diversion program rather than pressing charges, raising questions about prosecutorial discretion and fairness.

Joe Getty further elaborates:

"If you don't punish behavior, then behavior continues. That's how we raised Katie." [04:06]

---

3. Role of School Boards and Local Prosecutors

Armstrong and Getty underscore the importance of community involvement in school board elections and the selection of local prosecutors. They argue that these positions are pivotal in shaping societal norms and enforcing law and order, respectively.

Jack Armstrong asserts:

"People need to pay serious attention and bring serious energy to two things: School board elections and local prosecutors." [06:29]

The discussion emphasizes that proactive engagement in these areas is essential to counteract progressive agendas perceived as undermining traditional values and legal standards.

---

4. Due Process in Immigration and Legal Proceedings

The hosts shift focus to the concept of due process, especially in the context of immigration. They debate the various interpretations and applications of due process, highlighting its misuse as a political catchphrase rather than a genuine legal safeguard.

Jack Armstrong reflects on due process:

"What processes are due here? It varies case by case and situation by situation." [08:58]

Joe Getty adds:

"Due process depends upon what the procedure is. It means different things depending upon the procedure that's being applied." [07:54]

This segment critiques how due process is often invoked selectively to support disparate political agendas, diluting its foundational legal significance.

---

5. Evaluating President Biden's Mental Acuity

A contentious discussion emerges around the mental sharpness of President Joe Biden. The hosts and guest comment on perceptions of his cognitive state, juxtaposing personal observations with public performances.

Jack Armstrong states:

"He was sharp. He was on his feet. I saw him live event. I had meetings with him a couple of times." [11:17]

The conversation touches upon the broader implications of leadership qualities on national governance and public trust.

---

6. Russia-Ukraine Relations and U.S. Diplomatic Stance

The episode examines Vice President J.D. Vance's stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, particularly his intention to withdraw the U.S. from peace negotiations. The hosts analyze the potential repercussions of this decision on international diplomacy and regional stability.

Elizabeth Warren comments:

"What it looks like to me is Putin's got no reason to quit. And so they aren't going to. And so our stance is going to be this was our last deal, we're walking away." [15:06]

Jack Armstrong questions the consistency of the U.S. approach:

"Do we just abandon Ukraine the way that you've more or less described here, or does it go the other way and Trump decides to lower the boom on Putin?" [15:54]

The dialogue underscores the complexities of foreign policy and the unpredictable nature of international negotiations.

---

7. Maryland's Parental Rights and LGBTQ Education Controversy

A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to the Supreme Court's consideration of a case involving Montgomery County, Maryland, where parents are challenging school policies that mandate LGBTQ-inclusive education for young children. The hosts express strong opposition to what they perceive as inappropriate and ideologically driven curricular content for preschoolers and kindergartners.

Elizabeth Warren vehemently opposes the curriculum:

"I don't want that for my 14 year old." [19:18]

Jack Armstrong criticizes the lack of transparency and parental rights:

"The curriculum resources include books such as 'Pride Puppy,' which feature illustrated pictures of men in drag, furries and words such as queer and intersectional." [22:08]

The discussion highlights concerns about religious and socioeconomic discrimination, arguing that mandatory exposure to certain ideologies infringes upon parental and individual freedoms.

---

8. Wild Chimps Engaging in Alcohol Consumption

Injecting a lighter and more scientific note, the hosts discuss a fascinating discovery where wild chimpanzees have been observed consuming fermented breadfruit, leading to intoxication. They explore the implications of this behavior as a social bonding mechanism, drawing parallels to human alcohol consumption patterns.

Jack Armstrong narrates:

"Wild chimps have been recorded indulging in alcohol together... Scientists believe the sharing of boozy food is likely widespread among chimps." [32:06]

Elizabeth Warren humorously comments:

"So do they stand outside of a convenience store and wait till like a shifty adult is going in and say, hey, we'll give you 20 bucks if you buy us a six pack." [32:16]

This segment underscores the evolutionary aspects of alcohol use and its social functions across species.

---

9. Closing Remarks and Final Thoughts

The episode concludes with the hosts sharing their final thoughts, blending humor with critical reflections on the day's discussions. They reiterate the importance of vigilance in preserving societal values and express anticipation for future dialogues.

Jack Armstrong remarks on the chimps' behavior:

"Final thoughts: Monkey happy hours. Researchers have long suspected that human ability to metabolize alcohol could serve an evolutionary purpose." [33:28]

Elizabeth Warren adds a humorous twist:

"I wish it was some easy test for the whole. This is gonna require an antibiotic so you don't have to be like miserable for like a week and a half before they can give you the drug that'll get you over it in like 48 hours." [34:07]

The hosts sign off by encouraging listeners to engage with their content and stay informed on the myriad issues affecting society.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps:

• "If you don't punish behavior, then behavior continues. That's how we raised Katie." – Joe Getty [04:06]

• "People need to pay serious attention and bring serious energy to two things: School board elections and local prosecutors." – Jack Armstrong [06:29]

• "Due process depends upon what the procedure is. It means different things depending upon the procedure that's being applied." – Joe Getty [07:54]

• "The curriculum resources include books such as 'Pride Puppy,' which feature illustrated pictures of men in drag, furries and words such as queer and intersectional." – Jack Armstrong [22:08]

• "Wild chimps have been recorded indulging in alcohol together... Scientists believe the sharing of boozy food is likely widespread among chimps." – Jack Armstrong [32:06]

---

Conclusion

The "Monkey Drunk!" episode of Armstrong & Getty offers a comprehensive exploration of contemporary issues ranging from corporate challenges and political biases in the justice system to educational policy debates and unique scientific phenomena. Through engaging dialogue and incisive commentary, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty, alongside guest Larry Goodman, provide listeners with thoughtful perspectives on the complexities shaping modern society.

Transcript

[Jack Armstrong]

Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now here's Armstrong and Getty. Tesla announcing its profits have plunged a staggering 71% in the first quarter of this year since CEO Elon Musk took major role in the Trump administration. Musk telling Tesla investors he will soon be spending a lot more of his time focused on his business. The tribalism in so much of America, from car choices to the way the legal system behaves, really troubling. Equal treatment under the law seems to be gone, at least for certain people, many of them on the left. That's a topic I'd like to pursue with our guest in one of those subtopics is at least somewhat Tesla related, but Larry Goodman joins us. Larry's a retired judge for the Superior Court in Alameda, California, and also, happily, Katie's dad. Hello, Judge Larry. How are you, sir?

[Joe Getty]

I'm doing well, how are you?

[Jack Armstrong]

Good, good. I assume you're happily Katie's dad. Maybe I made a leap there. That was inappropriate.

[Joe Getty]

No, it's been a total blessing. I couldn't do better.

[Jack Armstrong]

Good answer. Good answer. So he's on the record as loving his daughter. We will see. I'd like to get a second witness anyway. Always great to talk. And there are a couple of excuses we had to call you up today, and one of them is this, this Democratic activist in Minnesota who committed over $21,000 in damage to Teslas across Minneapolis. This guy happens to be a state employee. He's a fiscal policy analyst for the state of Minnesota. Long history of anti Trump pro Democratic posts on his social media. He was arrested and quickly released and the prosecutor said now we're gonna put him in a diversion program and we will not charge him with any crimes. What's your reaction to that?

[Joe Getty]

Well, the prosecutor also. That way he'll make restitution, which we know he'll never make. But it's, it's what they do. I mean, there's no, it's a two tiered system of justice. If you're on our side, you get prosecuted and if you're on their side, you don't. Depending on who the DA is. Although I think more and more people are getting fed up with that kind of lack of prosecution. We just saw that in Alameda county where they recalled. The DA saw it in Los Angeles where they got rid of Gascons. So maybe the tide is changing a little bit.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, Hennepin county, where, which is where Minneapolis is, has A long history of this. It's a, it's a blue blot in a otherwise fairly sane state. But like most of the violent George Floyd BLM rioters, not just the, you know, maybe not just the, the, the loud boisterous ones who may have shoved somebody or I don't know, thrown some. No, like the violent ones were given a free pass in Hennepin county and you know, you've seen enough of the, the repercussions of. If you remove negative consequences for bad actions, you're just going to get more bad actions. And, and this guy or this system up there, man, they seem to be way to the left end.

[Joe Getty]

Well, they just sat around, if I remember correctly, while they were burning down towns and everybody just said, well they're, they have a right to express their frustration with what's going on. But in this, this guy that got off, he actually worked for Walls, didn't he, at some point or in the government up there. He was, I saw his name connected with the. Almost to be Vice President Tim Walls.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, he was fairly high up in the Minnesota dhs, I guess.

[Joe Getty]

But if you don't, if you don't punish behavior, then behavior continues. I mean that's, that's, that's how we raised Katie. You know, bad behavior got punished and, but if you same thing applies to courts. If that's why they went in California where they made, you could steal up to a $950 and not be punished. So what did everybody do? They went out and stole $950 over and over and over again. So if you don't prosecute or punish somebody that destroys Teslas, they're going to keep destroying Teslas. I was curious to see whether Pam Bondi might figure out some way to make this a federal crime. I don't think it is, but it might be kind of ironic if all of a sudden the feds came in and arrested them.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, if I'm some young radical or not so young radical, this guy's old enough to know better. And I see this Guy did over $21,000 in damages to Teslas across Minneapolis. He's on videotape multiple times. He's. It's utterly clear that it is him. It is a slam dunk prosecution and he is just completely turned loose. I'm gonna start defacing Teslas.

[Joe Getty]

Absolutely, of course you are. And you know, the question will be if you, if you do it the right way and so you don't commit a federal crime, then you can continue to, you know, Damage Teslas. And yeah, you're going to put you in a diversion program so you can make restitution. But I know from personal experience that most of the time restitution never gets paid. So he's going to get a pass on this whole thing.

[Jack Armstrong]

How do people get away with not paying the restitution?

[Joe Getty]

Nobody ever enforces it. I mean, we don't have debtors, prisons. Right. So if you're ordered to pay $100,000 in restitution and you don't have a job or you have a job that can. You can't afford to pay that kind of money. You just don't pay it. Can you be violated on your probation? Maybe, but there can't be any consequences. You can't put somebody in jail because they can't afford to pay a debt.

[Jack Armstrong]

So we have posited many times, we're talking to Larry Goodman, retired Superior Court judge in Alameda County, California. We've posited many times that people need to pay serious attention and bring serious energy to two things. School board elections and local prosecutors. County, whatever. Prosecutors, would you agree?

[Joe Getty]

Absolutely. I mean, that's. That's how the other side gets the foot in the door is normally the. My experience has always been when I was actually on a school board for eight years. But that's where people get into politics and that's where they get their foot in the door. And that's where they make grassroots decisions that affect people as they grow up. And then on the other side is the prosecutors. If you don't have law and order, you don't have a society. So you can indoctrinate people through school boards, and then you can have law and order or an effective society by how people are prosecuted.

[Jack Armstrong]

Final thing I wanted to ask you about, Larry, is the question of due process. It's a phrase that's been thrown around a lot in discussing various illegal immigrants getting heaved out of the country in one form or another, whether it's shipped down to the jail in El Salvador or Venezuelan gang members who flooded into the country under some Biden policies we discussed during hour three, I think it was. Anyway, due process, obviously is a sacred notion for citizens of the United States. It is the idea that the government can't be behave arbitrarily, that they have got to go through the steps to prove that what they're doing is okay, because the founding fathers understood how power corrupts. But when you hear the phrase due process thrown around in terms of like the immigration topic, what do you wish.

[Joe Getty]

People understood well, the due process depends upon what the procedure is. The due process in a criminal trial is a lot different. Different than a due process on an immigration hearing or presenting probable cause to an immigration judge whether somebody should be deported or not. So people throw that around. But it's a job specific term. Due process means different things depending upon the procedure that's being applied. So they can stand up, say, yeah, he didn't get due process. Well, maybe he did. Maybe all it takes is a probable cause statement to an immigration judge to find that he's a member of a gang. That's the due process he got.

[Jack Armstrong]

So, yeah, maybe the best way to illustrate it. Illustrate it is to flip it on its head and ask what process is due here. I mean, like, I would have different due process for would you like to go for coffee sometime? From will you marry me? There's different due processing, those two questions.

[Joe Getty]

There absolutely is. But it's the same. You have protections against arbitrary actions of the government, and depending on what action the government's taking would determine how much due process you're entitled to, I guess is the best way of putting it. But right now it's just becoming the catch. It's the phrase of the week or the phrase the last two weeks. Due process, due process, you know.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. And it kind of hurts my heart to hear it misused because it's such a fundamental principle in the country. But again, what processes do in this circumstance, it varies case by case and situation by situation. Larry Goodman, retired Superior Court Judge, Alameda County, California. Larry, it's always great to talk. Don't be a stranger. Let's do it again soon.

[Joe Getty]

Thanks for having me. And I'm usually always available. I'm retired.

[Jack Armstrong]

All right, we will hit you up. Thanks. A lot more to come. Want to get into a couple of other things that I was kind of hot to trot for, including the Maryland parental rights opt out policy case that the Supreme Court just heard oral arguments for. You can't believe, A, the perverse stuff being taught to the kids and B, how young they were in Maryland. And the school district was saying to parents, no, we're not going to tell you what you're teaching, and no, you don't get to opt out, even for preschoolers. Stay with us. Armstrong and Getty. Do you regret saying that President Biden had a mental acuity? He had a sharpness to him. You said that up until July of last year. I said what I believe to be true. And you think he was as sharp as you? I said I Had not seen decline and I hadn't at that point. You did not see any decline from 2024 Joe Biden to 2021 Joe Biden? Not when I said that. You know, the, the thing is he, look, he was sharp. He was on his feet. I saw him live event. I had meetings with him a couple of times. Senator, on his feet is not praise. He can speak in sentences. Is not praise. Fair enough.

[Elizabeth Warren]

So that sounded like Elizabeth Warren. Who's interviewing her?

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes, Sam Fragoso, whose work I don't know. But Sam was frank and fair and also. Damn right.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Well, she is.

[Jack Armstrong]

You're making a jackass of yourself.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah. She and everybody else is in a tough position. You're either going to have to go full. I thought it was best for the country that Biden wins. So I misled people about how Sharpie was because I thought the most important thing was defeating Trump. That actually is not. I think a lot of Democrats would forgive you for that. The pretending you didn't notice is just nonsensical.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Which really. Which is the more damaging tack to take.

[Elizabeth Warren]

I think the first one's way better. Well, the truth is generally better almost in every situation in life, with very few exceptions. But I think also politically, I think he'd be better off. Look, I thought Trump was such a danger and I thought he was okay enough, at least for the time being, that I was okay with it.

[Jack Armstrong]

And if I was going to spin it, if I was a Democrat consultant, I'd say and say this. And then I believed he would quickly give way to the Vice president, Kamala Harris, who almost won the last election.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah.

[Sam Fragoso]

Yes.

[Elizabeth Warren]

That's way better than claiming you didn't notice. I mean, that's just hilarious.

[Jack Armstrong]

Don't mess with a minute unless you want to get the benefit.

[Elizabeth Warren]

He's got a stutter, Michael. You make fun of people with stutters.

[Jack Armstrong]

He's got dementia. It's not a stutter. Coming up. While chumps indulge in chumps. Can I have a second take? Michael, do we have enough tape? Yeah, go ahead. Take two. While chimps indulge in booze fueled feasts. Rare video shows. Stay with us.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Wild chimps indulge in booze fueled feasts. Is a tough sentence. And intriguing.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes, yes. Both. Yeah, yeah. Drunk chimps on a rampage. Stay with us. Live team coverage. Plus the Maryland opt out of perverse sex education case. Want to go big on that?

[Elizabeth Warren]

Got sort of breaking news. So Rubio, the Secretary of State, said the other day that he is pulling out of the Ukraine Russia talks because it doesn't seem like anything seriously is happening. JD Vance with more today standing in front of a plane on a tarmac for he was going somewhere. Vice President J.D. vance, who may have killed the Pope, threatened to abandon Russia and Ukraine peace negotiations ahead of the high stakes meeting in London where the two warring nations are to discuss Trump's final offer, which is what they're calling it. They're calling this the final offer which is, you know, that's straight out art of the deal. But we've issued a very, we've issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and Ukrainians and it's time for them to either say yes or for the US to walk away from this process. Events told reporters we've engaged in an extraordinary amount of diplomacy. Yeah, all completely one sided. Hey, Ukraine, you need to give away everything they've taken and continue to have them on your border with the threat that they can come back anytime with no assurances from the rest of the world that we could stop them if they did. Russia, you get to keep everything you took.

[Jack Armstrong]

We'd like you to stop public facing stance. Yeah, well, I've always thought that I was, I've always hoped there was something going on behind the scenes that was tougher on Russia and more supportive of Ukraine.

[Elizabeth Warren]

But if there is, it certainly has been reported yet. And so what it looks to me like is going to happen, so we've been saying for a long time is Putin's got no reason to quit.

[Jack Armstrong]

Now.

[Elizabeth Warren]

There was a report that came out the other day that Russia has maybe six months more that they can do this financially and in terms of manpower, then they're just out of gas because they're burning through between the two sides. What did I read the other day? Thousand a week deaths or something like that, just unimaginable numbers. I mean, you know, we were in Iraq for 15 years, we were in Afghanistan for 20 years. We didn't get the kind of numbers they get in a month in terms of casualties. But anyway, if that's true, then maybe Russia's not in the position we think it, but it sure looks like Russia's got no reason to quit. And so they aren't going to. And so our stance is going to be this was our last deal, we're walking away. Work it out amongst yourselves.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, I don't know. I don't know. Because Trump, it seemed to me was going easy on and flattering Putin to get him to the table and try to cut the best deal that he could. But Trump also has a long history of if you give me the middle finger after I've given you that treatment, brace yourself because I'm going to bring the hate. So do we just abandon Ukraine the way that you've more or less described here, or does it go the other way and Trump decides to lower the, the, you know, the boom on Putin?

[Elizabeth Warren]

Well, I think we'll know if in weeks, if not days, which direction that is.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Yeah, probably so.

[Elizabeth Warren]

And will we continue to arm Ukraine the way we have in the past or more or not at all?

[Jack Armstrong]

Did I mention the wild chumps indulging in booze fueled feasts that's coming up next half hour. The actual interesting scientific aspect to this groundbreaking and shocking new video. And there actually is kind of a scientific insight to be had here. And also the Maryland school opt out case. What was said at the Supreme Court, really interesting and so perverse.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Don't be so scientific. You take the fun out of booze fueled chimp feasts. Armstrong and Getty, we will prevail. In a fight over parental and religious rights, the nine Supreme Court justices waded into the classroom at issue whether Montgomery County, Maryland should reinstate an opt out policy for parents who don't want their children, some as young as kindergarten, learning from books containing LGBTQ and other controversial themes.

[Jack Armstrong]

There wasn't coercion here, that there was mere exposure. I understood from the record that all that was required is that the books be put on the bookshelf.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

It has a clear moral message and.

[Jack Armstrong]

It may be a good message. It's just a message that a lot.

[Joe Getty]

Of religious people disagree with.

[Jack Armstrong]

We're talking about a Supreme Court case. The oral arguments were heard yesterday, Montgomery County, Maryland, schools saying parents do not have the right to know about the sexually explicit gender ideology lessons in public schools and they do not have the right to opt their children out for any reason, including religious reasons. Now, of course. Well, here's, here's the other side with typical rhetoric. 82 Michael the opposing side also at the court today. We know that a number of our kids are lgbtq. And the reality that we're talking about today is people want to erase us from books. They want to erase us from existing. Right. And all the kids will commit suicide. Yeah, we've heard it before. Here is what we're talking about, Jack. Imagine if your 4 year old was given a book with a find the word list like a puzzle and your four year old is supposed to find the words intersex, flag, drag queen, underwear, leather xoxo. And more from their preschool teacher.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Okay, I don't want that for my 14 year old.

[Jack Armstrong]

This is kids as young as three. And again, parents have no right to hear about this and no right to.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Opt out because you're trying to erase the gay community.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right. And they'll all commit suicide. Yes. In Mahmoud vs. Taylor, religious parents are asking the highest court to rule the Montgomery school system systems policy unconstitutional for obvious reasons of faith and that sort of thing. They are not asking the school district to remove the books from the classroom or even the removal of the ideological sexual material from instruction, which I would like them to do.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

They are merely asking for the right to be notified.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah. They shouldn't even be in the school.

[Jack Armstrong]

No, no. They shouldn't be teaching radical gender theory to kids. Good Lord. And there's a long standing precedent. So many of us have dealt with this through the years of you can opt out of various aspects of sex education through the years. You've actually looked into that fairly recently, Right?

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

Okay. So this is what.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Although it's very hard to have a handle on what you're opting out of and what will still be in.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes.

[Elizabeth Warren]

I mean, unless you're gonna go sit in the class every day.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, the activists are absolutely shameless in lying or hiding. Lying about or hiding what they're teaching. So Ashley McGuire wrote this piece for the National Review, and obviously from context, you can figure out that she lives here, there in that county. She says, but my home county is bizarrely dug in. The book list is part of a broader initiative in mcps, that's the school district focused on pre K, Pre K through 5th grade, titled Building Community with LGBTQ Affirming Picture Books for kids who are so young they can't really read about it. It's picture books, according to slides from the initiative, which were presented to teachers and obtained by one news outlet because they had to, like, dig and find this secret stuff because it was being hidden from the community. Teachers have been given a certain quota of these books to use in the classroom and can expect these lessons to be, quote, embedded throughout. And when parents.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Why don't more teachers come forward and say, look at this crap that they're making me teach?

[Jack Armstrong]

Because they see that the administration, their fellow teachers are arrayed against them. They go along to get along.

[Elizabeth Warren]

You'd be risking your career. Which is easier said than done.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah. Let's see. Quote, as with all curriculum resources, there is an expectation that teachers utilize these inclusive texts and lessons with all students. Parents were Told when parents sued one group of activists supporting initiative actually docs the names of the families on Twitter. They wrote, if these are your children's classmates, you have a duty to shun them. So again, so you understand what we're talking about. The curriculum resources include books such as Pride Puppy. Oh, literally luring the kids into the van of this ideology with a puppy.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Wow. Right?

[Jack Armstrong]

You're right.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Oh my God.

[Jack Armstrong]

I will.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Wow.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh, it's worse than that. The curriculum resources include books such as Pride Puppy, which feature illustrated pictures of men in drag, furries and words such as queer and intersectional. And Born Ready, a story about a five year old girl named Penelope who decides that she really is a he. And the response to parents who opt to. Who want to opt their children out, go to a private school. And this author writes, that's what I did with my kids. But not everyone can afford a five figure opt out even if there is an alternative nearby. The result is a kind of socioeconomic religious discrimination. Religious freedom for rich people.

[Elizabeth Warren]

That's interesting. Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

Bill Barr is one of the more even handed commentators I think around in his autobiography called, quote, a constitutional double standard in America's educational system. Public school students are subjected to militant secular progressivism, which is, quote, given the protections of the free exercise clause, but is, quote, not subject to the prohibitions of the establishment clause. The problem today is not that religion is being forced on others. The problem is that secular values are being forced on people of faith. Progressives claim to not like the law being used to force certain moral views on them, but now they want to use the law to force their moral views on us mothers.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah.

[Jack Armstrong]

And it's unquestionably it's quasi religious.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah. I mean, and that's a good way to argue it as a lawyer. But it's not because of my faith that I don't want you using the book Pride Puppy to teach my kid.

[Jack Armstrong]

Oh my God. About furries. My 5 year old. Good lord. Now, this is a longish clip, but I geek out on this stuff and I hope you will too, at least to some extent. This is Justice Gorsha Gorsuch talking to the school board attorney Alan Schoenfeld's 85. Michael.

[Sam Fragoso]

I just want to make sure I understand a few fact things and then a law question. What age do you in Montgomery county teach students normally about human sexuality?

[Alan Schoenfeld]

I think that it begins in either fourth or fifth grade.

[Sam Fragoso]

The human sexuality class, the family Life.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

And Human sexuality curriculum.

[Sam Fragoso]

Okay.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

I'm not entirely sure.

[Sam Fragoso]

Starts in fourth or Fifth grade, I think. Is there anything you can point us to in the record on that?

[Alan Schoenfeld]

I don't think so.

[Sam Fragoso]

Okay. And second, these books are being used in English class.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

The division between English class and other things in a second grade classroom doesn't really exist. You're sort of in a room with a teacher and sometimes.

[Sam Fragoso]

No, I appreciate that. I went to second grade too. But it's part of the English curriculum that these books are being used. And that's. I, I thought that was.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

Yeah, I'm not, I'm not fighting the premise. I'm just saying it's not the math class. It is not.

[Sam Fragoso]

It's not the human sexuality class. It's.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

It is certainly not the human sexuality class. I'm just sort of fighting the premise.

[Sam Fragoso]

That there's a neat distinction and they're being used in. In English language instruction at age three, some of them.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

So Pride Puppy was the book that was used for the pre kindergarten curriculum. That's no longer the curriculum.

[Sam Fragoso]

That's the one where they are supposed to look for the leather and things and bondage, things like that.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

It's not bondage. It's a woman and a leather sex worker, Right? No. No, that's not correct. No.

[Sam Fragoso]

I thought, my gosh, I, I read it.

[Jack Armstrong]

Drag queen.

[Sam Fragoso]

Drag queen and drag queen.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Correct.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

The leather that they're pointing to is a woman in a leather jacket. And one of the words is drag queen in the search.

[Sam Fragoso]

And they're supposed to look for those.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

It is an option at the end of the book, correct?

[Sam Fragoso]

Yeah. Okay. And you're. You've included these in the English language curriculum rather than the human sexuality curriculum to influence students. Is that fair? That's what the district court found.

[Alan Schoenfeld]

I think to the extent the district court found that it was to influence. It was to influence them towards civility, the natural consequence of being exposed, whatever. But to influence them in the manner that I just mentioned. Yes.

[Sam Fragoso]

Okay. And responding to parents who are concerned, do you agree that this. There was some intemperate language used?

[Alan Schoenfeld]

I. I don't know that those were responding to parents who were concerned. This was after the fact for most of these comments. And this was in a very public setting, which obviously got heated and some intemperate comments were used? Certainly.

[Elizabeth Warren]

You know what this reminds me of?

[Jack Armstrong]

They're perverts. They're sickos.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah. What this reminds me of is I never liked the people making all the arguments about marijuana where it's cancer victims need be able to smoke marijuana because they don't have any Hunger because of chemotherapy and everything like that. And I thought all along you just want people to be able to get high legally. Which turns out it was the case for like 99% of the people were marching for this stuff. And I've never really liked sex education in school because I've always just thought, why is this here? And I think that for most of the people that were trying to jam it into school, it was the camel's nose under the tent. You start with like the really easy to defend, you know how bait where babies come from and you get this crap in there.

[Jack Armstrong]

I don't think human biology is perfectly defensible. Perfectly defensive.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah, but it went beyond that very quickly.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yes, yes. Beyond the biological part, it's utterly indefensible. I don't find it difficult to draw a bright line. Well, how about like gay sex? And how about like furries and, and, and leather or drag queens?

[Elizabeth Warren]

The importance of needing to know how to please your partner.

[Jack Armstrong]

Where the hell. Specifically? Whatever partner of whatever sex. Yeah, no, no, I, I don't find it difficult to draw that line at all. Call me, I'll spend an hour on it and we'll have our answer. The idea that it's, it's too hard to draw that line is ridiculous.

[Elizabeth Warren]

The whole, the whole premise of Mott and Bailey, which we won't go through the whole thing again, is so worth knowing because it makes sense. Because it is. It's exactly the. Oh, you're saying cancer victims shouldn't be able to get marijuana. And you're. And your argument. Oh, you don't want biological sign. But that's your, that's what you retreat to.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Whenever you're trying to push in the other stuff.

[Jack Armstrong]

Right, Exactly. You start with a very reasonable premise that most people agree with, and then you float a crazy out there radical premise and then somebody says, whoa, I object to that. And you say you object to the very reasonable premise. I started with. It's a very, very common technique.

[Elizabeth Warren]

And the reason it's ancient is it works.

[Jack Armstrong]

Yeah, it doesn't effing work around here.

[Elizabeth Warren]

God, that is something I'd love to hear all of that Supreme Court argument. I heard some different gorsuch stuff on the news yesterday that I thought was good. Also, I mean, the idea that drag queen is in a word search, give.

[Jack Armstrong]

Me preschooler for any age.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Why would that be at any age in your school?

[Jack Armstrong]

Well, see that. Yeah, I agree 100%. But that shows the depth of their depravity. It's a concept that A little kid like that can't even comprehend and has never come in contact with. They are introducing the very concept of this, as the guy admitted. Yeah, the influence. Good Lord. Our government schools are so diseased.

[Elizabeth Warren]

So I didn't ask for this clip because I've been sick. We'll have to dig it up for tomorrow. Did you hear the thing where Martha McCollum was interviewing the leader of the biggest teachers union in America about the point of education?

[Jack Armstrong]

We actually have a clip.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Maybe we have that clip. Oh, maybe we have that clip.

[Jack Armstrong]

Go ahead, hit 89. We'll see if it's what Jack's describing. 90% of teachers times in classrooms are about how we engage kids to actually be their full selves. How we make sure that I'm obviously less concerned with them being their full self than I am with them being able to read and write and do math. And that is the biggest problem that we face in our schools today.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Yeah, that's not. The conversation was about what the point of public school is. And the leader of the biggest teachers union in America was saying 90% of our classroom time is engaging in how the children can evaluate their full selves. Their full selves or whatever the hell.

[Jack Armstrong]

They'Re talking about as opposed to reading.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Writing, math, you know, what are you talking about?

[Jack Armstrong]

Guys, let's dig up that whole interview. Let's have it for tomorrow. I want to go through that bit by bit.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Who sends their kid to school in first grade thinking, boy, I sure hope they learn to be their full selves today.

[Jack Armstrong]

How many people have engaged, applied for college and and said, boy, I did real well on the act becoming my full self test. So I bet I'll get into Yale.

[Elizabeth Warren]

What are you talking about? We'll finish strong. Next, Armstrong and Getty for the One More Thing podcast. I want to talk about some things that were different flying southwest over my little vacation than I'd ever seen before. So stay tuned for that.

[Jack Armstrong]

Excellent. Looking forward to it. Boy, I really enjoyed that listening to the oral arguments Gorsuch and that that attorney. I'm going to dig up the rest of that and geek out on it today. More importantly, perhaps Jack, is that wild chimps have been seen in the wild indulging in booze fueled feasts. According to a rare video, for the first time, wild chimps have been recorded indulging in alcohol together. Interestingly enough, they were drinking rose.

[Elizabeth Warren]

So do they stand outside of a convenience store and wait till like a shifty adult is going in and say, hey, we'll give you 20 bucks if you buy us a six pack.

[Jack Armstrong]

Because chimps are under eight. No, actually they were eating and drinking from a volleyball sized fermented breadfruit. And what's interesting is that they seem to be sharing it and bonding together, in effect getting together for a drink of the intoxicating fermented breadfruit. And scientists who observe this say, look, the possibility is that these primates, which are our closest relatives in the animal kingdom, could also use booze as a social bonding tool. And they believe the sharing of boozy food is likely widespread among chimps.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Well, they're 99% are genetics more than that.

[Jack Armstrong]

So the peer reviewed bindings offer a clue to another mystery. The origins of alcohol fueled feasting in humans. Could be goes back millions of years.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Wow.

[Jack Armstrong]

Get ready. With Katie Green and Michael Angelo, it's.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Final thoughts monkey happy hours.

[Jack Armstrong]

Researchers have long suspected that humans ability to metabolize alcohol could serve an evolutionary purpose. A theory known as the drunken monkey hypothesis might be my favorite hypothesis.

[Elizabeth Warren]

You don't have to stop throwing your feces here, but you can't, you have to throw it at home or something, I don't know.

[Jack Armstrong]

Something, something. Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew, beginning with our technical director, Michael. Hit it, Jack. Do whatever it takes to get yourself well. Use whatever drug you need. If you have to drive to Tijuana and get something illegal, go for it, right? That's right. Stakes are high. Katie Green, our esteemed muse woman, final thought. I think you should just go get drunk with some monkeys. You'll feel a lot better. Yeah, maybe.

[Elizabeth Warren]

How drunk did you get last night? Monkey drunk.

[Jack Armstrong]

Monkey drunk. Nits for you, Jack. Jack, a final thought for us.

[Elizabeth Warren]

I wish it was some easy test for the whole. This is gonna require an antibiotic so you don't have to be like miserable for like a week and a half before they can give you the drug that'll get you over it in like 48 hours. All right.

[Jack Armstrong]

Can you test me for a microbe? My final thought enjoyed having a couple of extra days off, various kids on spring break and that sort of thing. I'm very good at not working. Very, very good at it.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Armstrong and Yeti wrapping up another grueling four hour workday.

[Jack Armstrong]

So many people. Thanks a little time. Thank you for being here. Go to armstrongandgetty.com we have the story about the drunken chimps for instance under hotlinks.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Cool. We will see you tomorrow. God bless America.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Ghetti. How many more hours am I doing this? I'm serious. Go away. I am here. That's ludicrous, right?

[Joe Getty]

I'm so grotesque.

[Jack Armstrong]

I do think it risks escalating tensions. Well, don't smoke crack.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Do you understand?

[Joe Getty]

I cannot understand a word.

[Jack Armstrong]

Okay, so let's go out with a bang, man.

[Elizabeth Warren]

I can jam some ambrosia and sing to it in my car. Just jam the ambrosia.

[Sam Fragoso]

Are you sure of that, dude?

[Jack Armstrong]

On that high note.

[Elizabeth Warren]

Hasta la vista, baby.

[Jack Armstrong]

Thank you. Armstrong and Gettysburg.