Loading summary
Jack Armstrong
After investing billions to light up our network, T Mobile is America's largest 5G network.
Joe Getty
Plus right now you can switch keep your phone and we'll pay it off up to $800. See how you can save on every plan versus Verizon and AT&T. @t mobile.com KeepAndSwitch up to four lines via virtual prepaid card. Allow 15 days qualifying unlock device credit service ported 90 plus days with device ineligible carrier and timely redemption required. Card has no cash access and expires in six months.
Chumba Casino Ad
Life comes at you fast, which is why it's important to find time to relax a little. You time. Enter Chumba Casino. With no download required, you can jump on anytime, anywhere for the chance to redeem some serious prizes. So treat yourself with Chumba Casino and play over 100 online casino style games, all for free. Go to Chumbacasino.com to collect your free welcome bonus. Sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void where prohibited by law. 18 terms and conditions apply.
Joe Getty
Now broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong and Getty. And now here's Armstrong and Getty.
Jack Armstrong
Not live from Studio C. Armstrong and Getty. We're off. We're taking a break. Come on. You get a break, we get a break. We'll be back live for 25.
Joe Getty
Enjoy this carefully curated Armstrong and Getty replay. And as long as we're off, perhaps you'd like to catch up on podcasts. Subscribe to Armstrong and Getty on Demand or one more thing. We think you'll enjoy it thoroughly. Outrage on Capitol Hill after eight suspected terrorists from Tajikistan were arrested in the United States. The men who investigators believe have ties to ISIS crossed illegally at the US Southern border. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise blaming President Joe Biden's policies.
Jack Armstrong
How many more terrorists are in our.
Joe Getty
Country because Joe Biden opened up the southern border and Chinese intelligence agents.
Jack Armstrong
More on that in just a second. But this hour is going to be exciting. So Hunter's stripper Baby Mama has a book coming out. Joe Getty has excerpts from the book. That's exciting.
Joe Getty
Oh, it's shocking excerpts, Jack. We will bear all when it comes to the sordid life of Hunter Biden.
Jack Armstrong
I want to talk about the insanity that luckily is making national news. The subway in New York where they announced anybody who's a Zionist needs to get off the train now. And people chanting, what the hell is going on?
Joe Getty
Did you say Berlin in 1936? I know it's crazy.
Jack Armstrong
Anyhow, this story should be getting more attention. 8 dudes with ties to ISIS arrested who would. It would be actually better in a way if they had snuck across the border without encountering anybody. The fact that they did encounter border patrol and went through the process we currently have in place and still got into the country because they barely do anything when they encounter you.
Joe Getty
I mean, what is the.
Jack Armstrong
They call it a vetting process. What is the vetting process?
Joe Getty
It's utterly insufficient, obviously. And so I think this is a useful screw up. It's so ugly and clearly unacceptable. It illustrates the fact that the border is so overwhelmed, the folks at the border are so overwhelmed. Any quote unquote vetting they're doing is, is almost hilariously inadequate. We need serious change right now. I know the vast majority of Americans agree with us as well on that.
Jack Armstrong
One of your terrorist experts was on some cable channel the other day talking about the terrorist attack we've mostly forgotten that happened in outside of Moscow at that concert. Remember watching the footage of that? They just ran through the building shooting people. Yeah, somebody could put something like that together in the United States.
Joe Getty
Hopefully Tajiks too, weren't they?
Jack Armstrong
I don't, I don't. Allegedly, I don't remember where they are from but they did have the whole ISIS ties thing and hopefully it'd be hard to get your hands on weapons, but I don't know that it would be.
Joe Getty
Oh, in the U.S. now you just go down to some, you know, degenerate blue city and wave some cash in front of gang members and you'll have all the guns you want.
Jack Armstrong
Let's go a little more reporting on this before we talk. Just more from that same Fox report, Michael.
Joe Getty
Sources say a majority of these suspected terrorists were found in New York where a Democratic councilman says he's worried there could be another attack in the Big Apple.
Jack Armstrong
It's frightening.
Joe Getty
And we're headed for another 9 11. I predicted that. I think we should have a secure border. We should know who's coming into our country. We don't notable that that's a Democratic councilman. I think the problems become so enormous and so unmistakable. I mean, again, look at the poll numbers. I'm not surprised to hear Democrats speaking out a little more forcefully because they hear their constituents howling for something to be done.
Jack Armstrong
I guess this happens. I was just thinking there had been some examples in my life, I guess, where there's a problem clearly coming and you know it, but you just don't want to deal with it. Now or seems too hard or something, and then. Then it happens. And then you're like, yeah, probably should have dealt with that earlier. This is an extreme example of that. I mean, yeah, obviously you can't just let hundreds of thousands of random men from the Middle east come across your border or China or wherever.
Joe Getty
Right? Yeah, exactly. And it's become so well known around the world that anybody you want in the US Just send them to the Mexican border and say, yeah, yeah, they're killing everybody in my village. Yeah, yeah, I need asylum. And whoever, Whatever agent you want gets into the United States and back in the homeland, they're probably the various warlords and ISIS leaders and Chinese intelligence chiefs are probably saying, wait a minute. No, it can't be that easy. Stop it. No country behaves like that. You have to convince. Oh, yeah, the US Is just letting in anybody who wants to come in. It's really shocking.
Jack Armstrong
Yes. How about some mainstream media coverage of it? This is NBC, which focuses on, you know, maybe things have changed with that whole executive order that Joe Biden put through a week or so ago. Maybe, you know, they've closed the barn door. Finally. Let's see.
NBC News Reporter
New evidence. Migrants who cross the border illegally are still being released into the US by border agents. A senior DHS official tells NBC News those releases have dropped by more than half, but are still happening because agents don't have enough space to detain the large numbers of arriving migrants. An internal memo to Border Patrol agents in San Diego directs agents there to release migrants into the United States. Overall illegal border crossings under the new policy are still high, but have dropped from 40,000 to 3,000 per day. The record nearly 10 million migrants entering the US since he took office.
Joe Getty
Wow.
NBC News Reporter
But the Border Patrol union says the president's new action is not tough enough.
Jack Armstrong
That's NBC News, ladies and gentlemen.
Joe Getty
The idea that you could come, apply to be somewhere, and you get to stay there as your probably phony application is being assessed over the course of years and years is very odd practice. Like showing up to buy somebody's house and stay saying, by the way, I'm living here. Decide on my offer, I get to live here, and if you throw me out, you're the bad guy. It's just. Well, again, it's insane.
Jack Armstrong
Remember we had the polling like a week ago that a majority of Americans now favor a wall.
Joe Getty
Yeah. And the majority of Americans, including independents and a substantial chunk. Was it 40% of Democrats are in favor of deporting all illegal aliens. It is overwhelmingly popular, which, if you just if you want to say, if we took calls Armstrong and get it, you. I think Joe Biden is just a, is a, he doesn't lead at all. He's just a prostitute to whatever his voters want him to do. He just, he has no principles. He's just. Yeah, but his voters want him to kick all these people out of the country and secure the border. What are they doing?
Jack Armstrong
Well, yeah, the wording from that CBS poll was would you be in favor of deporting all undocumented immigrants? Which was never been on the table, will never be on the table. It would be undoable even if they passed it. And yet nearly 2/3 of Americans said, yeah, I'd be all for that. How do you not read that in the White House and think, oh, we are so far to the left of America on this, no wonder we're losing by 30 to 50 points depending on the question on this issue.
Joe Getty
And yet they're tied.
Jack Armstrong
And yet overall they're tied. Right.
Joe Getty
Oh, that's discouraging. I hate to end on a discouraging note. You know, here's a tangent. You in the mood for a tangent? I was thinking about this and it's. This may be a poor example now because of what I was just saying about the overwhelming support among Americans for closing the border and having seen immigration policies. But like in the early days of the Biden administration, when just undoing anything Trump did seemed like the right thing to do. I don't. What am I driving at? I think there's way too much representation and too little leadership in a lot of government. In other words, just fulfilling the whims of this constituency or that constituency, whether it's a good idea or not, in a way that you wouldn't have done in the old days because you wouldn't have known about those temporary whims of a constituency because communication is so fast and easy. Now you can have, you know, 60 jackasses in your district mad about a good policy because they don't understand it. And you'd be completely swayed by that as a congressperson. And I'm looking to our own industry and you see it reflected in various websites and news channels and stuff like that. They have the ability now to track second by second when people tune in, when they tune out what you're doing, when they tune out what you're doing, when they're staying tuned. It's in radio too, but we ignore it for various reasons. But you become this like you're being jerked on a chain, serving the momentary whims of the audience in a way that, that seems like good business at first, but then to me, it's like shoveling in sugar. That first bite sounds great, tastes great and all, but you just keep shoveling it in until you're sick. It's a. It's. How do I explain this? Being in Congress has always been a balance between being a leader and being a representative. And if your constituents want something loathsome, stupid and unconstitutional, that's when you gotta be a leader. And I just, I think we've got too much representative and not enough leader in our politics.
Jack Armstrong
I think that's pretty clear.
Joe Getty
The Armstrong and Getty show get more Jack, more Joe podcasts and our hot links@armstrongandgetty.com the Armstrong and Getty show.
Jack Armstrong
This is from a guy I don't know, journalist in Australia. A dude. Nobody on the left knows how to speak to young men because every five seconds this is at why so many young men voted for Trump and are moving away from the Democratic Party where the younger people used to all flock to the Democrats. Nobody on the left knows how to speak to young men because every five seconds at a leftist meeting you have to either do a land acknowledgment or go around in a circle and pay homage to the power of queer joy or some crap. He actually says S but it's pretty funny. I know this because I used to be a socialist and this is how all these organizations act. I saw all this with my own eyes. You have to literally be self flagellating to be in the left as a young man these days. And this is probably the understanding and experience and perspective of 90% of young men. The feeling is that you have to always constantly apologize for effing existing and just the crime of being born. And this is why the right is so effective at hoovering all these people up. Because the experience of constant self flagellation and self criticism is effing exhausting and annoying. And nobody wants to wake up every day feeling like they are an S person just for the crime of being born.
Joe Getty
I like that. Amen to that.
Jack Armstrong
He also, he also goes on I we have to fix this because I hate watching young guys fall into the Andrew Tate masculinity. And then he goes through a couple of examples of that because they got nowhere to turn to. They're going to these like super over the top extremist weirdos just to find somebody that's, you know, appealing to them and not criticizing. Yeah, not criticizing them for being a man. This is an Existential threat for the left and even an existential threat for humanity itself. Because the end result if we don't fix these gender warfare dynamics is South Korea style gender hyper war and a total fertility rate of 0.4, and humanity just gets wiped out. That is absolutely. I mean, that is absolutely true on the left. If you're going to continue to make males feel bad about even being born, you're not going to win a lot of elections or ever get that crowd.
Joe Getty
My heart bleeds for the little boys in public schools who are continually treated as if their maleness is a defect.
Jack Armstrong
I know, it's horrible.
Joe Getty
It's their energy. Their. Their boundless energy is a misbehavior. Oh, I just. You want to get me going?
Jack Armstrong
God. I came across some schoolwork the other day, and my. My son is homeschooled, but so much of the teaching material out there is put out there by publishing companies that are so left. I mean, you really have to work at getting the right stuff. But anyway, this particular thing was all about how women can be doctors. Yeah. No freaking kidding. At this point in my life, when somebody says the doctor will see you, I assume it's going to be a woman. I'm surprised if it's a man. So what are you. What are you talking about? You won.
Joe Getty
Wow. That's just again, a head scratcher. What do what? Wow. Wow. I thought I would feel differently after the election. I thought there would be, at the very least, fairly widespread recognition of some of the simple realities of the thing, which is that Kamala Harris was a weak candidate. Always was weak candidate, as I pointed out before. Hapes. You all rejected her, as I said, like a rabid raccoon when she was in the primary. Was that sexism and racism when you did that?
Jack Armstrong
Well, I haven't.
Joe Getty
No. Okay, well, then when the same thing happened, the presidential election, why is your explanation completely different?
Jack Armstrong
Yeah, that's. That. That is funny that that has never really been put to anybody. Your party rejected her when she ran before. Not like right wingers. Your own party, like the most active people in your party. Primary voters said no to her before she even got to the first contest. So how. How is it shocking that she got rejected by a larger group of people.
Joe Getty
And it's become a so oft observed fact. It's a truism. It's working its way toward being a cliche that when Kamala Harris on the View, then Colbert. Was it Colbert or Kimmel? Doesn't matter. Could not say how she would be different than the extremely unpopular Biden administration. That that was one of the most pivotal political moments in any campaign. I mean that is so widely discussed right now, there's no point in bringing it up. Everybody knows it. But as I was reading the long top tier editorial writer, editorial writers of the Washington Post dialogue about what happened, how did we get this result? That didn't come up.
Jack Armstrong
I haven't seen any criticism of Kamala Harris as a candidate from the left at all. Maybe that's coming, I don't know. But I have seen more than I have ever seen before and more than I expected of people saying we of Democrats have gone too far down the road of progressiveness in the culture wars. I have seen a fair amount of that.
Joe Getty
Yes. Yeah, yeah. Your old school liberals are finally finding the courage or the COVID to stand up and say, hey y'all, all that stuff is madness.
Jack Armstrong
Which by the way is the way you win the political arguments that that's when you've won. That's a good, a good other side of it would be on gay marriage where, you know, if you're old enough to remember this whole battle and discussion in America, it got to the point where Republicans realized we got to stop being anti gay marriage. It's just a losing issue. I mean we just can't be. And you stop talking about it. And hopefully that's going to start on the left with the, you know, boys playing girls sports or all kinds of different things where they realize this is we're gonna lose. We, we. Nobody wants to hear this or not enough people want to hear this.
Joe Getty
Right? Right. Our academic left wing is just completely wildly out of touch with Americans.
Jack Armstrong
That Latinx and herstory. Herstory and that sort of stuff is insane. Absolutely insane.
Joe Getty
Armstrong and Getty.
Chumba Casino Ad
Life comes at you fast which is why it's important to find time to relax a little you time. Enter Chumba Casino with no download required. You can jump on anytime, anywhere for the chance to redeem some serious prizes. So treat yourself with Chumba Casino and play over 100 online casino style games, all for free. Go to Chumbacasino.com to collect your free welcome bonus. Sponsored by Chumba Casino. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Voidware prohibited by law 18 terms and conditions apply.
Joe Getty
The Armstrong and Getty show so a couple of barely related thoughts. We're talking about this bizarro ruling in California where this male rapist, he's a brutal forcible rapist. He's done it more than once, is now identifying as a woman, which is meaningless. And stupid. And. And so the judges insisted the prosecutor refer to him as she and her through the trial. And then this person's in a woman's prison is obscene. And I was talking about the. How you can't underestimate what it does to you when anybody really, but the government forces you to say something, you know, not to be true. You have to submit to them. It breaks your spirit, which is why I won't do it. And then it's funny, we. I was, you know, did a trivia night with Judy and some friends, and I was so bummed because one of the questions was, what is the last line of 1984, Orwell's classic? And I couldn't remember. And I so bummed because I just read it and I'm so into it. The last line happens to be, he loved Big Brother. It's Winston Smith when his spirit was so completely broken, he actually internalized that he loved Big Brother.
Jack Armstrong
I had forgotten.
Joe Getty
He was fully cognizant of the evil of it. Yeah.
Jack Armstrong
And just driving home the message that if you're told something enough, you will come to believe it, which is highly troubling, but it seems to be the way our minds work and, and my.
Joe Getty
Militants about this topic and, and some others. It, you know, if. If I run into a transgender person, whatever that means, again, it's a. It's a mental problem. And I. I hope you find healing and happiness. I truly do. I'm never going to hurt anybody's feelings or humiliate them or try to discriminate against them in any meaningful way. I think that would be terrible and cruel, but at the same time, I understand from Orwell and others what it does to you when you submit to that sort of ideological oppression. It breaks your spirit, and I won't do it. Having said that, I just came across this. Big Brother isn't just watching. He's changing how your brain works. And this is so interesting. It was a study done by a. An Australian research group at a couple of different colleges in Australia. And the methodology is a little long and difficult to explain, but what they found was if these people, the subjects of the experiment, were aware that they were being watched and they showed them. These are the closed circuit cameras. We're making sure that everything's on the up and up, and we want to observe so we can look at it later. And in fact, here's the control room. Here are the TV monitors that we'll be using and blah, blah, blah. Then they did tests on awareness of and sensitivity to various stimuli, including faces. Cutting to the end. I know this is utterly unclear. Cutting to the end. What they found was when people were aware of being watched, they were hypersensitive to images of faces. They became cautious and on edge, and I would describe it as borderline afraid. They became hyper aware of, oh, my God, who's watching me and why. In other words, it changes your psyche to know you're being surveilled in ways that we're just beginning to understand.
Jack Armstrong
I can feel that. I feel that if I. If I become aware there's a camera in, you know, you're in a lobby of something, you just look around, you see a camera, it makes it. You can feel that something changes.
Joe Getty
Yeah. Yeah. And again, it's not known exactly how much and in what way, which worries me. I've heard it said that a surveilled society is a. An obedient society, a polite society.
Jack Armstrong
Well, we might as well figure out how it affects us because it's here a lot of places and coming other places. We will all be surveilled all the time soon, everywhere. And it's getting closer every day.
Joe Getty
If our purpose is to make ourselves insane as a society, we're doing very, very well. Sure, I. I congratulate us all. Completely different topic. I thought this was great. Alan Dershowitz and Andrew Stein wrote this piece, what Trump can do about sanctuary cities, because Trump has vowed to do plenty about it. Also bring sanity back to colleges and elementary schools through the Department of Education and stuff like that. And I love the ideas, but sometimes the mechanics are a little mysterious. What levers does he have? Exactly. And Dershowitz, and what did I say the guy's name is? Stein wrote that a constitutional showdown is looming over the border policies. We've all heard Tom Holman saying, we're going to deport these people. We're going to round them up. You can either help or not. I liked what Homan said, too. He said, all right, if you're not going to support us, you're not going to cooperate with us. We're going to put two, three times as many ICE agents in your city. That's fine. We'll get it done. Denver Mike Johnston has said he'd be willing to go to jail to prevent deportations. All right, put them there.
Jack Armstrong
What a hill to die on. I again, I just. So you're going to go to jail to protect criminals who've committed crimes? Because that's where we're starting with. People are committing crimes in the United States and are here illegally, you're gonna go to jail to make sure that they don't get deported. You're nuts.
Joe Getty
You know, I wish you could somehow get to what is going on in a guy like that's head. I mean my guess is that he has a desire to be accepted and to be seen as enlightened and progressive and merciful. And that desire is so strong in him. It's like, you know, being a horny 17 year old Mal or being starving, starving hungry. It just so perverts his sense of priorities. I don't get that at all.
Jack Armstrong
New poll, new poll out today. Similar numbers to what we've had before. Two thirds of Americans want all illegals deported. That's never going to happen. But the ones that have committed crimes in the United States are going to get deported. So the percentage on that's got to be like 90%. And you're going to be, you're going to die on that hill, you nut jobs.
Joe Getty
I really think they are.
Jack Armstrong
I think they are too.
Joe Getty
Again, it's, it's, it's very strange. I mean even if we just deported the 20% who are the most derelict, lazy, useless and or criminal, that'd be an enormous victory. Just a fabulous.
Jack Armstrong
Well, there are 600,000 criminals here illegally right now.
Joe Getty
At least. Sure. Anyway, how will this all be resolved? By the courts. They write Article 6 of the Constitution mandates that federal law, quote, shall be the supreme law of land notwithstanding the laws of any state. The 10th Amendment reserves to the states all powers, quote, not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states. Oh right. That is work. Correct. The constitutional question is whether the authority to regulate immigration, including the power to deport illegal aliens, is a power delegated to the federal government. And they write, of course it is. Border crossers can travel from state to state unhindered. So entry anywhere in the US is entry everywhere. Thus, the federal government alone has the authority to control the right to enter and remain as it does, the power to exclude, deport and prosecute those who violate immigration laws.
Jack Armstrong
Now to me the only question. I'm not an expert in all this law stuff, but to me the only question has been how did it go this long where a county, a city, a state can declare themselves sanctuary? That's nuts.
Joe Getty
Well, here's the rub they write. The Constitution does not prohibit states from providing food, health care, housing, driving privileges and other necessities to everyone within its borders. Nor does it compel the states to employ resources to aid the Federal government. The Supreme Court has articulated an anti commandeering doctrine that prohibits the feds from, quote, conscripting the state's officers directly to enforce federal law. And they write about how the doctrine's been revised over the years, and there's no real clear guidance on how it would precisely apply to sanctuary cities. Much would depend on the specific state action at issue. Blah, blah, blah. The precedents established when some southern state officials tried to prevent the enforcement of federal courts desegregation orders strongly suggest that states and cities may not actively block legitimate enforcement of federal law.
Jack Armstrong
But they don't have to help.
Joe Getty
Right? Exactly.
Jack Armstrong
Come help.
Joe Getty
In between these extremes are a variety of state actions and refusal to act. Give some examples.
Jack Armstrong
I can see legally how that's a thing. And I guess if you live in a nutjob place like San Diego county just voided voted the other day, where your constituents, a majority of your constituents say, yeah, don't help the federal government deport. People are committing crimes in our county and here legally, if a majority agrees with that. Okay, I. I can't believe there are very many places where that's the case, including, like you saw the city council meeting in Chicago. People are horrified. They're spending so much money on illegals you keep. I find it hard to believe that the majority of people would be okay with keeping criminals there who are there illegally.
Joe Getty
I know, it's. It's a bizarre notion. I can't believe anybody believes it, but. So these guys, who are pretty solid legal scholars, just think, all right, we're not doing nothing they can get away with, but even a whiff of opposition or impediment would be actionable. And the federal government could, you know, take measures. What measures might be, I don't know. It's still. It's obscene to me that you would. And look, I am fully acquainted with the argument that if the immigrant community fears any interaction with the government will lead them to be deported, they won't report a rape. They won't report when these Venezuelan monsters kidnap them and torture them and take over their apartment. They'll be afraid to talk to any authorities. We can't have that. I get that, and I actually respect it on one level. But the idea that you have a violent criminal that you're going to put out on the streets and you're fully aware they've got a detainer, a detainment order from ice, and you. Well, we're not going to help them. We're going to release that rapist or that armed robber or whatever, onto the streets. Because we don't believe there's such thing as an illegal human. You are just. You're incapable of operating in the adult world. You shouldn't. You shouldn't even be like. You should have a caretaker. You certainly shouldn't be running anything. I'm strong and gifty.
Chumba Casino Ad
The reality is, this is fabulous.
Joe Getty
I thank you. That's enough of that.
Jack Armstrong
This is all crazy. It's just the way it is.
Joe Getty
Yup. But damn it, we weren't allowed to.
Jack Armstrong
Ask about the big guy. This is the United States of America, for God's sake.
Joe Getty
Let's not play games. This is the Armstrong and Getty show.
Chumba Casino Ad
Looking for excitement. Chumba Casino is here. Play anytime. Play anywhere. Play on the train. Play at the store. Play at home. Play when you're bored. Play today for your chance to win and get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for? Don't delay. Chumba Casino is free to play. Experience social gameplay like never before. Go to Chumba Casino right now to play hundreds of games, including online slots, bingo, Slingo and more. Live the chumba life@chumbacasino.com VGW Brew no purchase necessary, void or prohibited by law. Seek terms and conditions.
Joe Getty
The Armstrong and Getty Show. This is interesting and not terribly shocking. Well, I guess when you get down to the granular details, it is fairly shocking. But Americans are more reliant than ever on government aid. An aging population, economic distress raised dependence on federal and state support. And it matters a hell of a lot for our elections, as you might guess. Wall Street Journal looking into a major study. This is a little graphics heavy, but I can interpret it for you. They're talking about the share of personal income from government assistance in how many counties is it? 25% or more. In 1970, government safety net money accounted for significant income. That's more than 25%. 25% or more in fewer than 1% of America's counties.
Jack Armstrong
So say that again. In what year?
Joe Getty
In 1970, it was less than 1%. Okay, okay. In 2000, it went from less than 1% to roughly 10%, which. That's the year 2010%, which a tenfold.
Jack Armstrong
Increase is not minor.
Joe Getty
In the year 2022, 53%, more than half of U.S. counties drew at least a quarter of their income from government aid.
Jack Armstrong
So this is. We were talking about this last week and now that it's the average person in the bottom quintile. I know this is a lot complicated talk here, but the bottom 20% of income earners in America get on average $68,000 per household of transfer payments. And that's left out of every argument about we have the highest inequality of any nation in the world. They never include this stuff. And what you just talked about there, that's never included in these conversations from Bernie Sanders or probably Tim Walls tonight in the debate. People living paycheck to paycheck. Well, more people are getting handouts from the government than ever before by a lot.
Joe Getty
And as we've discussed with Craig the healthcare guru, socialism is not a light switch. It's a, it's a fungus.
Jack Armstrong
Oh, absolutely.
Joe Getty
Spreads across a country and its programs, benefits and yeah, yeah, sure. Starts getting across.
Jack Armstrong
There's just no stopping it.
Joe Getty
Yeah. So the big reasons for this dramatic growth are interesting. Some of them I think most conservatives would reject out of hand. But it gets a little complicated when you dig into it. There are a much larger share of Americans who are seniors, period. We're living longer and we've aged as a population. We're not having kids anymore. And health care, I'm sorry, health care costs have risen fairly dramatically as they've gotten more fantastic. The technology we have at our disposal to keep ourselves healthy and alive is truly awe inspiring. But it costs.
Jack Armstrong
Yeah. And as, as my doctor said last week, what exactly is the point? Sometimes he wonders as we just get, you know, we, our brains don't work, our bodies don't work, but we hang around longer at a great expense.
Joe Getty
Right. Well, could be the money is the point in at least some situations. Although it's. I understand it's an odd conundrum that a person could sit around rubbing their chin, thinking about for a long time. You're not going to turn down medical advances because every advance is an incremental step. It can lead toward other advances or cures or what have you. But at the same time, you and your doctor are quite right. Hey, good news. We can keep Alzheimer suffering granny alive for one more year. We can stave off her cancer with this new gene therapy, blah, blah, blah. What are we doing here? Yeah, anyway, to get back to the major threat of the thing. Aruni here, blah, blah, blah. At the same time, many communities. So it's the aging and the development of medical technology, number one. At the same time, many communities have suffered from economic decline because of the challenges, including the loss of manufacturing, leaving government money as the larger share of people's income. In such places, I could bore you to death. I won't, because I do this for a living and kind of Enjoy getting the paycheck. But one of the big debates in conservative circles these days is the question of the Reagan esque free trade global economy, conservatives versus what's being called the new conservatism or but whatever you want to call it, everybody's always.
Jack Armstrong
Government conservatism, some people call it, yeah, industrial planning.
Joe Getty
You know, sometimes people even call it central planning, what have you, and are bellowing at each other about it as if the solutions and the questions and answers are very simple. They're not at all. There's, There are trillions of dollars at stake. So I understand why the people making lots and lots of money want to keep that money flowing. They don't care how much unemployment there is in rural Pennsylvania, for instance, at the same time. Oh, oh. And the other point I was gonna make on the side of the new conservatives, back in Reagan's day, we didn't have the situation where our chief global adversary is one of our chief trading partners, technology partners, and practically indispensable to the world economy. So if you are pitching free global trade of a Reagan esque sort, you are pitching continued interaction slash dependence with China, which is just a bad idea. Times have changed. The arguments have to change too. So I have sympathy with both sides, but it is not simple. So for its analysis of government spending, eig, which is the folks doing the analysis used a government definition of income that includes spending on programs that Americans pay into, such as Medicare and Social Security. Another major government health program, Medicaid is counted. The analysis also includes unemployment insurance, food stamps, the earned income tax credit, veterans benefits, Pell grants, Covid era payments and other income supports. States help pay for some of these programs like Medicaid. But the federal government covers roughly 70% of the cost. And it doesn't include other ways government spending floods into corners of America such as farm subsidies or military bases. So this spending accounts for a big and growing share of not only the income of the nation, but also our national debt. We are addicted to government spending slash social programs as a country.
Jack Armstrong
There's no weaning off that either. I don't believe you can go backwards. I don't think it's possible.
Joe Getty
No. But you do have to be honest about the dollars and cents coming and going. And we're headed for a cliff.
Jack Armstrong
So we went from 1% in 1970 to over half now?
Joe Getty
Correct.
Jack Armstrong
That's unbelievable. Not very many people could tell you that.
Joe Getty
Armstrong and Getty.
Chumba Casino Ad
Looking for excitement. Jumba Casino is here. Play anytime. Play anywhere. Play on the train. Play at the store. Play at home. Play when you're bored. Play today for your chance to win and get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for? Don't delay. Chumba Casino is free to play. Experience social gameplay like never before. Go to Chumba Casino right now to play hundreds of games, including online slots, Bingo, Slingo and more. Live the chumba life@chumbacasino.com VGW Group no purchase necessary, void or prohibited by law. Seek terms and conditions.
Armstrong & Getty On Demand: The A&G Replay Tuesday Hour One
Release Date: December 31, 2024
Host: Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty
Producer: iHeartPodcasts
1. Introduction to National Security Concerns
The episode kicks off with a serious discussion on recent national security issues, particularly focusing on the arrest of eight suspected terrorists from Tajikistan with alleged ISIS ties who infiltrated the United States via the southern border.
Note: This initial statement is part of an advertisement and is skipped in content-focused summaries.
2. Border Security and Immigration Policies
Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty delve into the implications of these arrests, critiquing President Joe Biden's immigration policies. They express significant concern over the effectiveness of current border security measures and the broader impact on national safety.
They highlight the inadequacies of the so-called "vetting process," labeling it as "utterly insufficient" and "hilariously inadequate."
The hosts reference a Fox report detailing that a majority of the terrorists were found in New York, raising alarms about potential future attacks.
3. Media Coverage and Public Perception
Armstrong and Getty critique mainstream media coverage, specifically NBC News' reporting on the decline in illegal border crossings due to Biden's policies. However, they argue that the measures are still inadequate and do not address the root problems.
The discussion shifts to public opinion, citing recent polls where a significant majority of Americans favor stringent immigration measures, including deporting all undocumented immigrants.
4. Political Leadership vs. Representation
A substantial portion of the conversation centers on the balance between political leadership and representation. Joe Getty articulates frustration with elected officials who prioritize constituent demands over principled leadership.
Joe Getty (11:50): "The Armstrong and Getty show get more Jack, more Joe podcasts and our hot links..."
Joe Getty (09:28): "And yet they're tied. Oh, that's discouraging."
They argue that excessive focus on catering to every constituent whim leads to poor governance and undermines effective leadership.
5. Cultural and Gender Issues
The hosts transition to discussing cultural wars, particularly the left's approach to gender issues and its impact on young men. They criticize progressive movements for what they perceive as creating an antagonistic environment for males.
Jack Armstrong (12:07): "This is from a guy I don't know, journalist in Australia... Nobody on the left knows how to speak to young men because every five seconds at a leftist meeting you have to either do a land acknowledgment..."
Joe Getty (13:19): "He also goes on I we have to fix this because I hate watching young guys fall into the Andrew Tate masculinity."
They express concern that such cultural dynamics are driving young men away from the Democratic Party and towards extremist ideologies.
6. Surveillance and Psychological Impact
Armstrong and Getty discuss the psychological effects of pervasive surveillance, referencing a study by an Australian research group that found people become hyper-aware and anxious when they know they're being watched.
Joe Getty (20:32): "He loved Big Brother. It's Winston Smith when his spirit was so completely broken, he actually internalized that he loved Big Brother."
Joe Getty (22:46): "They became cautious and on edge, and I would describe it as borderline afraid."
The conversation emphasizes the long-term societal impacts of constant surveillance on mental health and personal freedom.
7. Sanctuary Cities and Legal Frameworks
A significant portion of the episode is dedicated to the debate over sanctuary cities. The hosts analyze legal perspectives, constitutional implications, and the tension between federal authority and state-level policies.
Joe Getty (26:58): "The Constitution does not prohibit states from providing food, health care, housing, driving privileges and other necessities to everyone within its borders."
Joe Getty (27:50): "But they don't have to help."
They argue that sanctuary cities undermine federal immigration laws and pose serious risks by allowing violent criminals to remain in communities without repercussions.
8. Dependence on Government Assistance
Towards the end of the episode, Armstrong and Getty discuss the growing dependence of American counties on government assistance programs. Referencing a Wall Street Journal study, they highlight the dramatic increase in income derived from government aid.
Joe Getty (31:47): "In 1970, it was less than 1%. Okay, okay. In 2000, it went from less than 1% to roughly 10%, which. That's the year 2010%, which a tenfold."
Jack Armstrong (32:05): "That's right. So this spending accounts for a big and growing share of not only the income of the nation, but also our national debt. We are addicted to government spending slash social programs as a country."
They argue that this reliance on government assistance contributes to economic stagnation and inhibits personal financial growth, posing significant challenges for future policy-making.
9. Conclusion and Final Thoughts
The episode wraps up with a critical look at the sustainability of current government spending and the potential consequences of continued reliance on social programs. Armstrong and Getty caution about the nation's trajectory towards excessive government dependency, which they believe could lead to economic and social instability.
Notable Quotes:
Conclusion
This episode of "Armstrong & Getty On Demand" presents a critical examination of current national security, immigration policies, cultural dynamics, and economic dependence on government assistance. Hosted by Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty, the discussion is marked by a strong conservative perspective, emphasizing concerns over border security, the effectiveness of political leadership, and the societal impacts of progressive cultural shifts. The hosts advocate for stricter immigration controls, greater political leadership, and a reevaluation of the nation's reliance on government aid programs.