Your Mother Declares Martial Law

Summary

Summary of "Your Mother Declares Martial Law" – Armstrong & Getty On Demand

In the December 4, 2024 episode of "Armstrong & Getty On Demand," hosts Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty tackle a series of heated political and social issues, delivering their insights with characteristic fervor and sharp analysis. The episode, titled "Your Mother Declares Martial Law," delves into topics ranging from presidential pardons to international political crises and controversial domestic legislation.

---

1. Hunter Biden Pardon Controversy

Timestamp: [01:25]

The episode kicks off with a robust discussion on President Joe Biden's recent pardon of his son, Hunter Biden. Joe Getty underscores the foundational American principle that "no one is above the law" (01:25). He emphasizes the sanctity of this principle by asserting, "No one, not even the President of the United States is above the law in my administration" (01:43).

Getty criticizes the pardon as a blatant violation of justice, highlighting its undermining effect on the rule of law. He expresses disappointment in the media's handling of the situation, pointing out perceived biases and inconsistencies. Getty states, "Hunter Biden will escape accountability because his father is President" (06:48), framing the pardon as a clear instance of preferential treatment afforded to politically connected individuals.

---

2. Media Critique and Whistleblower Testimonies

Timestamp: [02:18 - 09:30]

Armstrong and Getty delve deeper into the media's reaction to the pardon, citing negative coverage from reputable outlets like The New York Times. Getty laments the "drive by media," praising late radio personalities like Rush Limbaugh for their critical perspectives (02:53).

They discuss whistleblower testimonies that allege preferential treatment within the Department of Justice, emphasizing the integrity of their own reporting: "Our story never changed because we told the truth" (05:12). Getty argues that these testimonies reveal systemic issues within the administration's approach to justice and accountability.

---

3. South Korea's Martial Law Declaration

Timestamp: [13:56 - 18:34]

Shifting focus to international affairs, Armstrong and Getty analyze South Korea's recent turmoil following President Yoon Suk Yeol's declaration of martial law. Getty compares Yoon's actions to historical coup attempts, expressing concern over the potential erosion of democratic institutions.

Getty commends the resilience of South Korean institutions and citizens who resisted the president's move, stating, "I’m heartened that the institutions held, that the checks and balances worked" (18:04). The hosts draw parallels to the January 6 Capitol riot, emphasizing the importance of robust democratic checks in preventing authoritarian overreach.

---

4. Major League Baseball's Golden Bat Proposal

Timestamp: [13:11 - 20:16]

In a lighter yet still critical segment, Armstrong and Getty discuss Major League Baseball's proposal to introduce a "golden bat" feature. This idea, aimed at increasing game excitement by allowing top players to bat in crucial moments, receives sharp criticism from the hosts.

Getty refers to the proposal as "idiotic" and contrasts it unfavorably with other rule changes like the pitch clock, which he supports (19:41). The hosts argue that such gimmicks detract from the traditional values and strategic depth of baseball.

---

5. Tennessee's Gender-Affirming Care Law and Supreme Court Case

Timestamp: [22:16 - 43:22]

A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to the controversial Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for minors, which is currently under Supreme Court review. Armstrong and Getty vehemently oppose the legislation, framing it as an egregious violation of children's rights and parental authority.

Joe Getty labels the law as "sex change experiments on children," asserting that it constitutes "sex discrimination under the 14th Amendment" (25:00). The hosts dismantle arguments made by proponents of the law, including statements from lawyer Chase Strangio, whom Getty accuses of twisting language and promoting baseless claims about the efficacy and ethics of gender-affirming treatments.

The discussion includes a critical analysis of media narratives and testimonies from affected families. Getty references a CBS News interview with a mother whose son detransitioned after hormone therapy, using it to illustrate the potential harms of such treatments (34:08).

Notable Quotes:

• Joe Getty: "The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed." (01:25)
• Joe Getty: "Hunter Biden will escape accountability because his father is President." (06:48)
• Joe Getty: "Declaration of martial law said there can be no political processes at all, including the press." (17:43)
• Joe Getty: "To defy biological reality and enable this ideological experimentation on the bodies of children is just awful." (25:00)

---

6. Closing Remarks and Future Topics

As the episode progresses towards its conclusion, Armstrong and Getty briefly touch upon additional societal issues, including energy drink consumption among teenagers and the broader implications of federal policies on public health. They emphasize the need for accountability and reform within governmental institutions to prevent future abuses of power.

---

Conclusion

In "Your Mother Declares Martial Law," Armstrong and Getty provide a fervent critique of current political dynamics, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional principles and safeguarding individual liberties. Through their analysis of the Hunter Biden pardon, South Korea’s political crisis, MLB’s proposed rule changes, and the contentious Tennessee law on gender-affirming care, the hosts offer listeners a perspective rooted in conservative values and a commitment to justice and accountability.

The episode is a compelling listen for those interested in in-depth political commentary and the defense of traditional American principles.

---

Timestamp Reference:

• 01:25: Joe Getty's opening statement on the rule of law.
• 01:43: Emphasis on no one being above the law.
• 02:18: Introduction to media critique.
• 05:12: Whistleblower testimonies.
• 06:48: Hunter Biden's lack of accountability.
• 13:11: Introduction to MLB's golden bat.
• 17:43: Discussion on martial law implications.
• 18:04: Commendation of South Korean institutions.
• 19:41: Critique of the golden bat proposal.
• 22:16: Introduction to Tennessee's gender-affirming care law.
• 25:00: Critique of gender-affirming care.
• 34:08: CBS News interview segment.

Transcript

[Jay Shetty]

Hey, it's Jay Shetty with On Purpose. My newest episode is out now with Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from.

[Jay Shetty]

Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Trust me, you won't want to miss this one.

[Unknown (Fiasco Podcast Host)]

It's hard to read the news these days without asking yourself, how did we get here? Fiasco is a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which resulted in a high stakes stalemate, ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Jack Armstrong]

Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio.

[Joe Getty]

Studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center.

[Jack Armstrong]

Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

[Joe Getty]

Armstrong and Getty.

[Jordan Peterson]

And now here's Armstrong and Getty.

[Joe Getty]

This nation was founded on a principle that there are no kings in America. Each each of us is equal before the law. No one, no one is above the law.

[Jack Armstrong]

The fact is, no one is above the law in this country. No one is above the law.

[Joe Getty]

The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Make no mistake. No one, not even the President of the United States is above the law in my administration. No one in my. No one is above the law.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

This is not just another Biden political story. The pardoning of Hunter. This is going to be like in the very top ways you describe the whole Joe Biden thing. If you, if it's ever talked about him being president, him pardoning his son, I would agree.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, if it's a three horned description of his presidency, this will be one of those horns.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Along with being senile and deciding to run again. But the New York Times, for instance, their columnists. Here's the list of their columnists from Is this today or yesterday? Yesterday, I think. A second rate crime gets a second rate pardon from Gail Collins. A disgraceful pardon by Brett Stevens. Biden's pardon for his son Dishonors the office from Jeffrey Toobin. And there were a couple of more really negative things the New York Times was like Full on. This is awful.

[Joe Getty]

I was crazy shocked listening to one of my favorite podcasts that these very learned and smart people who I enjoyed listening to completely whiffed on the 11 year blanket immunity from anything you might dig up. I mean, that's unfreaking believable. That's the key aspect of this. But the drive by media. God bless Rush Limbaugh. God rest his soul. That is such a great description because they took a glance. Oh, he pardoned his son. I'll be damned. He said he wouldn't, but he did anyway. Taxes and guns. Anyway, let's move on to the next thing. Maybe there's a scandal. Oh, yeah. But the great Eli Lake in the Free Press with a terrific piece talking about all of the times Joe Biden and his cronies put aside, crapped on, ignored are democratic norms. Between the laptop cover up, the perversion of the intelligence services, the law fair, all of it. It's a great, great takedown. I wish we had more time because it was terrific. But I wanted to get to this. And this is Joseph Ziegler and Gary Shapley, who wrote a piece in the Journal. Do you remember those names? Those were the IRS whistleblowers who came by at risk and great damage to their careers and personal lives and said, hey, the Merrick Garland Justice Department is giving Hunter an unbelievable sweetheart ride when he's committed serious, serious tax crime. And as I said, they have a piece in the Journal. Do we have that Scott Jennings clip I was looking for yet? Hanson? We can figure that out in a second because he does a great job with that. Anyway, they write the White House's story on Hunter. Biden keeps changing. The President supposedly had no knowledge of his son's business, then no involvement in it, then no financial benefit directly from it. The goalpost moved as more facts came to light. Before the election, Joe Biden promised he would respect the legal process and issue no pardon or commutation to his son. This week he went much farther than preemptively commuting any sentence to keep his son from prison. He issued a broad pride and pardon for any and all crimes over a nearly 11 year period. He gave his son the sweeping immunity to which career prosecutors refused to agree to as part of an aborted plea deal. When that deal collapsed in January 23, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel. Despite his testimony, they get into a detail that's a little distracting. These dizzying narrative shifts happened because the two of us blew the whistle and exposed the preferential treatment The Biden Justice Department gave to a powerful political family. Our story never changed because we told the truth. And I thought, you know what? Stepping aside from the specifics of what we're talking about here, you have one party whose story constantly changes. The other part of your story never changes.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Well, I remember on.

[Joe Getty]

Shouldn't there be a saying about that, that all human beings grow up knowing how powerful is that?

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yeah, I remember the Washington Post gave Biden four Pinocchios on one of those claims. The never had knowledge of the business of my son or something like that.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. So to get back to the whistleblowers, President Biden's pardon is an insult to every honest tax paying American. He claimed that his own Justice Department unfairly targeted his. So on the contrary, we produced mountains of evidence and testified under oath about the machinations Justice Department, including Mr. Weiss, used to shield the Biden family from a thorough investigation of alleged corruption in Ukraine, Romania and China. This year, a jury found Hunter Biden guilty of federal gun charges in Delaware, and he pleaded guilty to willful tax felonies in California. The President's letter falsely suggests that his son was merely late in filing and paying his taxes because of serious addictions. He wrote that in such cases, when back taxes are paid with penalties and interest, they are often resolved without criminal penalties. But his son was treated differently. That's malarkey. The American people need to know. The President's good one. Yeah, well played. And the President's letter omits that Hunter Biden admitted to intentional felony tax evasion, criminal charges for which ordinary Americans are held accountable every day. Hunter Biden admitted that he filed false tax returns with the IRS knowingly and willfully while sober. False deductions taken on his tax return contradicted statements he made in his memoir, which he also wrote while sober. These false deductions included things like sex club memberships, luxury vehicle rentals, the sex.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Club memberships that he put down as a business expense, which, you know, maybe they were.

[Joe Getty]

Ordinary Americans are routinely held accountable for that kind of tax fraud every day. But Hunter Biden will escape accountability because his father is President. Joe Biden's letter doesn't mention that his broad pardon also absolves his son of any other crime in the past decade that the Justice Department didn't fully investigate. In a public filing in August, Special Counsel Weiss's office alleged that Hunter Biden agreed, quote, to attempt to influence US Public policy on behalf of a Romanian businessman, but did not charge Mr. Biden with a violation of the foreign agents Registration Act. The dishonesty that has infected the Washington political class must stop. And the bureaucrats in the Justice Department and the IRS who abused their power and acted unethically ought to be held accountable. Then he talks. They talk about the constant retaliation they have faced from the very powerful Democratic Party circles and the help they're getting from whistleblower support organizations. But without serious reform and major changes in personnel and policy, something like this will happen again. We will keep our oaths as sworn federal tax law enforcement officers, stand up for fair and equal treatment of every taxpayer, and speak out against improper politicization of the Justice Department. Those dudes are patriots. I'm glad they took it down point by point. What? What a parade of lies. That statement Biden wrote was. It's shameless. Utterly shameless.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Well, and the fact that the New York Times has five different columns from regular writers and guest essays blasting this is unethical and awful and a disgrace. All the different things, really.

[Joe Getty]

The only support it's getting is from cable news talking heads who are employed to make arguments. They don't mean any of it. It's just an effort to keep you watching. But it's intellectually bankrupt. It's. It's boring. It's stupid. Which is why a lot of those cable news channels are going away. But Anyway, well done, Ms. Messers, Ziggler and Shapley.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

So we have a breaking news story. The CEO of United Healthcare has been shot dead in front of a midtown hotel in New York. And there's some news breaking that it was a targeted, like, assassination. Now, there's no way they would know that already. That could just be the sort of Internet rumor that flies around. And it turns out it'll just be, you know, some Venezuelan gang person that been arrested five times, which is trying to rob a rich guy. Who knows? But we'll keep our eye on it.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah, I'd love to know some of the facts that have led people to say that. I mean, it could be. It could be a business thing, could be a personal thing. It was like, remember when that tech guy got gunned down in San Francisco and it turned out to be a love triangle deal?

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Right? Yeah. So the Supreme Court is taking a look at transgender surgeries?

[Joe Getty]

Well, yeah, treatments for kids.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

What happened in South Korea yesterday is nuts. Thank God it got settled down the way it did. And it showed how important strength in your institutions is and how brawny and.

[Joe Getty]

Brave your congressional AIDS are.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Right.

[Joe Getty]

That aspect of the story is nuts. We'll get to that.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yeah, A lot of good stuff this hour.

[Joe Getty]

Stay here, Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

My latest episode is with Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to let go of? What do I have to transform? That can be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from one of the.

[Joe Getty]

Most articulate men of our time, clinical.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Psychologist turned culture warrior, Dr. Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

The men who prefer short term mating opportunities are psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian and sadistic. So one of the unintended consequences of the sexual revolution is that the freed up women have been delivered to the psychopathic men. Most people who have Post Traumatic Stress disorder don't have it because they were hurt. They have it because they encountered someone who wanted to hurt them.

[Jay Shetty]

Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown (Fiasco Podcast Host)]

In the aftermath of a transformative election like the one we just had, it's hard to read the news without asking yourself every five seconds, how did we get here? That's exactly what we're always trying to figure out. On Fiasco, a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics, the 2000 election, which came down to a recount in Florida and ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. In many ways, it's the beginning of the story we're living through right now. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore and find out how a statistical tie in the Florida vote count put the nation into an unprecedented holding pattern during which American voters waited with bated breath to find out whether Al Gore or George W. Bush would be the next president of the United States. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I do want to talk at some point. Major League Baseball is considering the Goldenet bat as something that they add in adding to the things that they've done over the last couple years with pitch clocks and what, one runner on second base in the extra innings or whatever that they do.

[Joe Getty]

Is it like the Golden Bachelor? They'll have a 60 year old guy.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Come up and hit exactly an aging Ken Griffey Jr. No.

[Joe Getty]

And if he gets on base, aging groupies will attempt to get his hotel Room number.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Wow, is it crazy In South Korea yesterday, the height of it happened while we were on the air and we were bringing it to you as we were like watching it on cable news. But here's a report from NBC, a little follow up and then we'll comment ourselves this morning.

[Jack Armstrong]

A political crisis is deepening in South Korea, a critical US ally. It comes after a chaotic night that saw the military mobilized around the national assembly, its version of Congress, all of it triggered by South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's extraordinary move to declare martial law, an attempt to replace the country's democratic government with military rule. Yoon says he did it to stop what he called North Korean anti state forces within the government. The ill fated move fueling a tense standoff with protesters scuffling with police as helicopters flew overhead. One opposition lawmaker livestreaming how he climbed a fence to get back inside the legislative building for an emergency vote that forced Yoon to revoke the order within hours.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yeah, and you didn't see the. If you haven't seen the video, I mean it's quite the fight they have there at the doors as people are trying to get in and out. And there for a while it was not known. Are the police and the military listening to the president or are they following the law and the parliament or what's going to happen here? Well, it's classic coup stuff is what it is.

[Joe Getty]

Well, Jack, as you know, I spent my entire collegiate career studying this very sort of thing, comparative politics, political systems, that sort of thing. And here is my comment. You could just go into the streets and chant the guy's name. You suck. You suck. And that would be a good chant, wouldn't it?

[Unknown (Commentator)]

That's his name.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. You suck, Yol. Anyway, where was I? Yes. Actual commentary.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Your mother declared martial law.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. So he declares martial law a couple hours later. In the parlance of the modern day, the South Korean people said, yeah, no, and. But he actually had some elements in the military that were obedient enough or didn't know what to do that tried to bust in to prevent parliament from doing its work. And they were rebuffed by like the equivalent of congressional aides armed with fire extinguishers and furniture.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

It had a bit of a January 6 look to it there. Definitely.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. Thank God the special forces guys, I think they're paratroopers or something like that who were trying to get in to prevent the parliament from being parliament, decided not to open fire on their countrymen.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Well, who were, who were they answering to Though some military leader who just took it upon himself to choose which direction to go. I mean, at some point in the chain, somebody was freelancing it, weren't they?

[Joe Getty]

Well, the president declared martial law.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Right. Which was a. So he apparently is a crook, or at least he's an alleged crook. He's got all kinds of investigations.

[Joe Getty]

Half a nut.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yeah. And all kinds of investigations going on. And him and his wife. And they're just. They're crook politicians, and the jig might be up. And so he declared martial law and was gonna try to, what, become a dictator, I guess. And the parliament wanted to get back in there to vote and say, no, martial law is over. We're going back to regular life, and now we're going to impeach you, which is what they're working on today. But they got back in there and they voted 190 to nothing to get things right.

[Joe Getty]

Right. Like so many countries around the world, a good deal of their system is based, at least in part, on the United States Constitution. And their system says the president can declare national law, but if the assembly convenes and says, no, your justification is not adequate, it's over.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Which is kind of interesting.

[Joe Getty]

Declaration of martial law said there can be no political processes at all, including the press. To which the parliament said, yeah, if we got to fight our way in, we're doing it.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yeah. And martial law means you're not able to travel around freely. And so if they're not in the building and you declare martial law, how would they get back in to vote? I guess that's what the president was hoping.

[Joe Getty]

Right. But my ultimate point is I'm heartened that the institutions held, that the checks and balances worked, and the patriotism of the South Korean, you know, parliament and their folks, and I'm sure a lot of them believe stuff I don't believe in or maybe rotten or whatever, but they said, whoa, whoa, whoa, this is too much. And it's so too much. I'm going to fight soldiers in the hallways to make sure we can have our vote.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Wow. That is. That is getting too close to losing your democracy right there.

[Joe Getty]

That's really shaky. Yeah. Keeping in mind that South Korea has just been a democracy Since. Was it 1980? So I can't remember specifically, but not. Not very long.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

What's a golden bat in Major League Baseball? They're thinking actually bringing this in. And the idea is that, like, one idea that's being floated is you'd get one per game if you follow baseball at all. You know, you go through the order, you know, one through nine, you give the order before the game. That's the order everybody at bats in. But with the golden at bat, you'd be able to, you decide. It's a crucial situation. Fourth inning, bases loaded. We could win the game right here. Shoi Ohtani is going to bat next. You just bring in your best player to bat, then you get one golden at bat per game. And the idea would be even though.

[Joe Getty]

He'S, he's elsewhere in the lineup.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yes. The idea would be that for the fans anyway, you get the big moment, biggest player thing happening all the time. Instead of bases loaded, you know, two outs, are the pitchers up next? Crap. You know, it'd be more exciting for the fans if the best player gets to come up the bat, I guess.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. As a semi purist, as a moderate, moderate purist, I like the pitch clock, for instance. I despise this idea. I hate it.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

They're not exactly sure how I will.

[Joe Getty]

Fight South Korean paratroopers in the hallways to prevent this.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

They're not quite sure how they would fix that. But then. So then do you bat in your same spot again? So you end up batting like twice.

[Joe Getty]

Or potentially twice in a row if you whiff the first idiotic. Stop it. Stop this madness.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

What's Major League Baseball's idea? We have much more news to get to.

[Joe Getty]

I hope you can stay here, Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

My latest episode is with Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to let go of? What do I have to transform? That can be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from one of the.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Most articulate men of our time. Clinical psychology has turned culture warrior, Dr. Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

The men who prefer short term mating opportunities are psychopathic, narcissistic, akubalian and sadistic. So one of the unintended consequences of the sexual revolution is that the freed up women have been delivered to the psychopathic men. Most people who have post traumatic stress disorder don't have it because they were hurt. They have it because they encountered someone who wanted to hurt them.

[Jay Shetty]

Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown (Fiasco Podcast Host)]

In the aftermath of a transformative election like the one we just had, it's hard to read the news without asking yourself every five seconds, how did we get Here. That's exactly what we're always trying to figure out on Fiasco, a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which came down to a recount in Florida and ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. In many ways, it's the beginning of the story we're living through right now. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore and find out how a statistical tie in the Florida vote count put the nation into an unprecedented holding pattern during which American voters waited with bated breath to find out whether Al Gore or George W. Bush would be the next President of the United States, listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Chase Strangio]

This is a law that bans medical treatment only when it is prescribed inconsistent with an individual's sex. Our argument is that that treats people differently because of their sex and therefore the court has to treat it like all other forms of sex discrimination. And that's why it's unconstitutional.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

What's that?

[Joe Getty]

Oh, that is the. Just as a side note, former gal current fella Chase Strangio, who's a lawyer arguing before the Supreme Court that Tennessee, the state of Tennessee, which is one of the 26 states that bans cruel experiments on children who are momentarily confused.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

About their sex or deny suicidal kids gender affirming care driving them to suicide. You animal.

[Joe Getty]

Who ordered a load of crap. Got a load of crap here. Uh, yeah. So the state supreme Court is being asked to say that the Tennessee law prohibiting so called gender affirming care, which is actually sex change experiments on children, is somehow discriminatory based on the 14th amendment. Because if I as a young lady need testosterone for some sort of recognized medical condition, I can get it. If I as a young girl who is momentarily confused through peer pressure and activism at my perverted local school into thinking, I don't know, maybe I'm transgender or queer or something, if I as a girl want that same treatment, I can't get it. Therefore it is sex discrimination under the 14th Amendment.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I think it's the commerce clause.

[Joe Getty]

Oh boy. The law being challenged in Tennessee prohibits administering medical treatments to minors if the purpose is to enable a gender transition or to address, quote, purported discomfort or distress from a discordance, according to the minors, between the minor sex and asserted identity, which is a so new. It's like it makes the electric car look like horse travel theory of the way people's minds work in sex. That just became super hot in academia and now all of a sudden kids are getting mutilated over it. It's. It's shocking to me that a country as advanced as ours would fall for this, this fraud and let kids be abused.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

But. So the Supreme Court is looking at this for the first time, the trans stuff. And they could rule what?

[Joe Getty]

That states may bar doctors from doing this or leave children.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

So that. Or they. Or they. Okay, so.

[Joe Getty]

Or they will say no states. You can't do that. It is sex discrimination. And. And if a confused girl wants male hormone treatments, they should be able to. I.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Well, if it was a super woke lefty court, I would be worried. But I gotta believe there are five votes to say no, this isn't sex discrimination. That's nuts.

[Joe Getty]

So let's hear again from the recent rival to manhood, Mr. Strangio, the trans lawyer. 26.

[Chase Strangio]

Michael, I obviously disagree with that premise that allowing transgender women into women's sports or women's bathroom is a threat to women. But it is also not the question before the court in this case. And in fact, it is a totally independent question about whether a law that bans medical care for transgender adolescents discriminates against people based on sex versus these separate cases that preceded any of these health care bans will continue to be litigated in the courts regardless of the outcome.

[Joe Getty]

Here is actually right about that. It is a separate question. It's also a question with a very clear answer.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I'm calling it medical care, though.

[Joe Getty]

I don't like that. Yeah, I'd cut the crap. Cut the crap. This is our theme. Stop allowing people to twist the language or use prejudicial language or state that which is clearly not true or has never been proven by science. This is the clip I really want. Next one.

[Chase Strangio]

Michael, these are not doctors being forced to provide this medication. These are doctors who are wanting to treat their patients in the best way that they know how based on the best available evidence to us. And these are young people who may have known since they were two years old exactly who they are, who suffered for six, seven years before they had any relief. And what's happening here, it's not the kids who are consenting to this treatment. It's their parents who are consenting to the treatment. And as a parent, I would say we. When our children are suffering, we are suffering. And these are parents who love their children, who are listening to the advice of their doctors of the mainstream medical community and doing what's right for their kids and the state of Tennessee has displaced their judgment.

[Joe Getty]

Wow. I almost. I wish I had that in writing because there's so many things to unpack from.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

No kidding.

[Joe Getty]

Oh, where do you want to start? With the mainstream medical authorities. A lot of the quote unquote mainstream medical authorities have been captured by their far left and their guidelines have been written by activists who have no, no scientific basis for their conclusions. It's a horror. I've spent lots of time looking into this. Trust me when I say there is no supporting evidence that this stuff is good for kids or prevents suicide or leads to happy outcomes. It's all been faked up by activists. Secondly, the fact that it's the parents who consent. Jack, maybe you want to handle that. I don't know.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I'm sorry, I got sidetracked by the. She brought up the age of two. So I wanted to hear that thing from Jake Tapper where somebody makes that argument that kids know from the age of two whether they're trans or not.

[Joe Getty]

That was it.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Oh, that was it. Okay.

[Joe Getty]

That is unbelievable.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

That is absolutely unbelievable. It's crap. Wow. So she thinks it's like there's something wrong with my kid. You take your kid to the doctor and like they would say they have, I don't know, rickets and then, and then they tell you this is the medicine you need for them and that's the way this is playing out. And it's not some weird progressive parents who would love it if their kids were trans and keep putting that in their head until they start to believe it. Because why wouldn't a 3 year old believe it? 3 year olds believe everything you tell them. That's why it's so sick and twisted and your kids should be taken away from you if you're doing this to your children. And then you find a doctor who's also of the same mindset politically to go along with it.

[Joe Getty]

If the activists at school haven't done, you know.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Right.

[Joe Getty]

That delightful work for you in the state of California, for instance, among others. Yeah, it's, it's, it's just awful.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

It's interesting that like, in the state of California, they will take your kid away if you don't use the right pronoun. But they won't take your kid away if you try to convince a poor little three year old boy that he's actually a girl. That's horrific.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. Correct. Yeah. It's perverse. It's sick. I have to stay calm when I talk about this stuff. And I am certain that in a very short time, it will be seen as the obscenity that it is.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I know somebody who, at the very young age, they convinced their which direction to go. They convinced their little boy that they were a girl. You are a monster.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

You are a monster.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. Shannon Bream discussed this case on Fox News. It's a little lengthy, but she does a good job of explaining stuff. Maybe I had left something out. Go with 28, Michael. Why not?

[Jack Armstrong]

This Tennessee law is at the heart of this and advance treatment of the gender issues for patients who come seeking them if they're under 18, 18 years old. Surgeries and also hormone replacement therapy and hormone treatments. But what's at stake in this case today is actually just the challenge to the hormone treatments. It's not including. The plaintiffs aren't challenging the surgical ban for kids who are under 18 in the state of Tennessee. I want to read something. Because these plaintiffs were joined by the Biden administration, which decided to intervene in this case. And here's part of their argument to the Supreme Court. They say this. If these laws are allowed to go into effect, transgender adolescents in large swaths of the country will lose access to medically necessary, necessary care, resulting in predictable and significant harms like escalating distress, anxiety, and suicidality. That's their argument they'll make today before those nine justices.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

The suicidality. I was way too blase with my little joke about the gender affirming care for suicidal kids, but they have used that as a, you know, I'll shoot the hostage, a sort of bargaining chip through this whole thing. Well, you have to give them the gender affirming care because studies show they're a lot more likely to commit suicide. If you have a suicidal kid around this, you've got a really unhappy, disturbed kid, period. And that's horrible. I've been there. It's horrible. But the idea that the way to fix it is to have him operated on is crazy.

[Joe Getty]

Oh, yeah, it's horrible. It's horrible. As we've stated many times. Can you imagine if some right wingy group said, you know, effeminate boys, you know what? They're gay. They're gonna be gay. No, I tell you what, let's just cut off their genitals and make them into women. How about that? They would be seen as monsters. Quite correctly.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Oh, my God. Correctly, your kid is suicidal. So now you're going to give him an operation that changes them forever and they're going to be okay.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. Lop off their healthy breasts, for instance.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Oh my God.

[Joe Getty]

So anyway, the Wall Street Journal is writing about this and the argument of the plaintiffs, and they write that on the hormone thing is, I described that a boy can get it but a girl can't and therefore it's. Well, I'll quote, A teenager whose sex assigned at birth is male can be prescribed testosterone to conform to a male gender identity, but a teenager assigned female at birth cannot. The problem with this argument is that it's sophistry, it's fake arguments. The Tennessee law is focused on diagnoses and it permits treatments for legitimate medical conditions. A biological male can obtain male hormones to correct some medical problems. A biological female can't get male hormones for gender transition. This isn't sex discrimination unless the starting ideological premise is that preference is the only difference between boys and girls, which gets to the root of this insanity. Nobody's sex is designated or assigned at birth. It's merely observed. And the fact that there are a few ambiguous folks, a very, very few at birth, does not disprove the fact that the vast, vast majority of people are clearly male or clearly female. It's, it's an awful argument and dopey. And it's in defense of the indefensible. And to defy biological reality and enable this ideological experimentation on the bodies of children is just awful.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

We have something new that sounds good fitting into this. This is in front of the Supreme Court building. The great Jan Crawford of CBS News talking to a mom who has dealt with this.

[Joe Getty]

Schoolteacher Ariane Adam Chukova said her son was 16 when he came out as a trans girl.

[Jack Armstrong]

His dad and I were very open to different gender expressions and we just figured that this was an experimental phase. And so I was like, yeah, you know what? Dress however you want. Like cool, that's great. I was open to all of it. But then I realized if he went to the doctor, they were going to prescribe him hormones. And he was begging for the hormones. He was begging for puberty blockers. The doctors told me my daughter would commit suicide if I didn't transition her.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Oh my God.

[Joe Getty]

The doctors told you that they did.

[Jack Armstrong]

Both women, self described liberals did not let their children take medication which can be irreversible. They said their kids went through intensive.

[Joe Getty]

Psychotherapy and after about 18 months, both children detransitioned.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Shocking.

[Jack Armstrong]

When you're 25, if you decide that's the pathway you need, then we will of course love you to support you in your decision.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

That's a great, great report from cbs News right there.

[Joe Getty]

And I've got some brilliant commentary on this. We've got to do it on the other side of the break just for time reasons. There's a British study, I think it was British that 85 plus percent of kids grew out of this. I think I'm the other sex within a couple of years and realized, oh, I was unhappy because of this. I mean it's obscene that activists grab confused kids and do these experiments. More to come.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

How about a medical doctor sitting you down as a parent and telling you if you don't do this, they're going to commit suicide. Oh my God. I punch him in the face.

[Joe Getty]

Completely fake.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I said him because men are doctors, women are not. That's why I said.

[Joe Getty]

Good point. Quick word from our friends at Simplisafe Home security. We all worry about the safety of our homes and our families. No time. Better to act than now. Right now Simplisafe is extending its massive Black Friday deal for you. Good folks get 50% off new SimpliSafe security system from We've all thought about this. You know what we ought to call Simplisafe Angie have been talking about, you know, well, let's talk about it. We'll do it tomorrow.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

No, do it now. Do it now. I had my, the only time I've ever had my house broken into many, many years ago. It was Christmas and I'm certain it was. They were breaking in because there are presents under the tree and all that sort of stuff. That's a common thing. You'll feel a lot more comfortable driving away from your home like I do when you've got the Simplisafe system set up.

[Joe Getty]

And how about their active guard? Outdoor protection from Simplisafe changes the game by preventing crime before it happens. If someone's lurking around or acting suspiciously, agents who are monitoring in real time see them, talk to them directly, set off your spotlights, even call the police before the break in occurs. In all of that crazy monitoring and all, it's about a buck a day. No long term contracts, no cancellation fees. Fantastic. Go to SimpliSafe.com Armstrong get 50% off a new system with select professional monitoring plans. This is your last chance to get the best offer of the year. Simplisafe.com Armstrong there's no safe like Simplisafe man.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Good on Jan Crawford for having that report. Of course it fits in with the thinking of like 90% of America. The Supreme Court is finally looking at this. More on it next.

[Jack Armstrong]

Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

My latest episode is with Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am I doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to let go of? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from one of the.

[Joe Getty]

Most articulate men of our time, clinical.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Psychologist turned culture warrior, Dr. Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

The men who prefer short term mating opportunities are psychopathic, narcissistic, akiabalian and sadistic. So one of the unintended consequences of the sexual revolution is that the freed up women have been delivered to the psychopathic men. Most people who have post Traumatic stress disorder don't have it because they were hurt. They have it because they encountered someone who wanted to hurt them.

[Jay Shetty]

Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Unknown (Fiasco Podcast Host)]

In the aftermath of a transformative election like the one we just had, it's hard to read the news without asking yourself every five seconds, how did we get? That's exactly what we're always trying to figure out on Fiasco, a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics, the 2000 election, which came down to a recount in Florida and ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. In many ways, it's the beginning of the story we're living through right now. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore, and find out how a statistical tie in the Florida vote count put the nation into an unprecedented holding pattern during which American voters waited with bated breath to find out whether Al Gore or George W. Bush would be the next president of the United States. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

A lot of serious news stories today, but the news flow kind of dictates that, like there's breaking news around the Hunter Biden pardon that I can't wait to talk about.

[Joe Getty]

Oh really?

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I mean, this is becoming clear to me. This is going to be his legacy of the worst thing he did. This is worse than ignoring his dementia and running again and the student loan crap and all these various things. This is Joe Biden, the Hunter Biden pardon. And there's a federal judge last night while we were in bed blasting the Biden family over this, and we'll read that in hour three.

[Joe Getty]

Speaking of the mummy's legacy, can I have a side order of the Afghanistan withdrawal, please? Right, yeah. So this is a brilliant written by John Bush. I'm just going to read it to you. There's a dangerous trend sweeping through America, especially among susceptible teenagers. Thanks to social media and peer influencers, teenagers and even adolescents are pumping their bodies with chemicals. The secret is often kept from the parents until it's too late. I'm talking, of course, about energy drinks. Last year, Senator Chuck Schumer warned that one brand's 200 milligrams of caffeine, quote, could endanger the health of kids, causing them to be moody and suffer headaches.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I would like Chuck Schumer to take some energy drinks so he talks a little faster.

[Joe Getty]

He demanded that the FDA investigate the drink's manufacturer. That's pretty rich, considering that Schumer fully supports giving children hormones and even performing experimental surgeries on them, what he calls gender affirming care to make those children look more like the opposite sex. In Schumer's world, the federal government should intervene when a young girl consumes caffeine equivalent to about two cups of coffee. But cheer her on if she takes enough testosterone to make her infertile, increase her risk of heart attacks and strokes, and irreversibly alter body. So much for public health.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

That is really good, I'd say. We can't have. We have an epidemic nationwide of children having the equivalent of two cups of coffee. If you want to, like, have your penis lopped off, though, at age whatever, go ahead.

[Joe Getty]

Right. All of this is of a piece with the Biden administration's policy on position on this important issue. President Joe Biden appointed Dr. Rachel Levine as Assistant Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, second highest position in our nation's largest health agency. Levine, a male who identifies and presents as a woman, pressured the World Professional association of Transgender Health wpath to remove age limits. This person pressured them to remove age limits in its standards for care for life altering procedures used on children experiencing gender dysphoria. From puberty blockers to cross sex hormones to invasive surgeries that remove healthy body parts. As even the New York Times reported, this pressure was not based on science, but on worries that age limits would increase political opposition to these dangerous and experimental treatments. So much for science.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

I'm Mr. Superlative, as you all know. But this might be the craziest thing we've done in America. It really might be.

[Joe Getty]

It's close. It is close. I Mean, I've got, later on the show, a brilliant takedown of the idea of slave reparations. Slavery has been, like, universal in the entire history of mankind. It's loathsome. It's awful.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

No, it's just.

[Joe Getty]

But it's incredibly common.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

Yeah. It's just a blip that it hasn't occurred in human history.

[Joe Getty]

Well, right. Yeah. It's prevention. It's a great victory. This is unprecedented. Bizarro Europe is saying, whoa, we're totally wrong on this. Don't treat kids. It's terrible for them. That's an experiment. I don't know how we got down that road. We're not doing it anymore. The United States is almost alone in this sickness.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

It's really Aztecs throwing children in volcanoes. Weirdness.

[Joe Getty]

Yeah. And about as supportable scientifically. Wow.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

And I guess it's quite the scene at the Supreme Court today as they're arguing about this whole thing. There's music and dancing and parties and arguing and the whole thing.

[Joe Getty]

Who are you?

[Unknown (Commentator)]

People who are in support of children getting mutilated?

[Unknown (Fiasco Podcast Host)]

Who are you?

[Joe Getty]

It's a radical ideology. It's all tied into postmodernism, neo Marxism. Them, whether they understand that or not. But it's crazy.

[Unknown (Commentator)]

So crazy. And when it's over, they'll look back on it years from now and think, how the hell did that happen? Yeah.

[Joe Getty]

Get the podcast Armstrong and Getty.

[Jay Shetty]

Hey, it's Jay Shetty with On Purpose. My newest episode is out now with Jordan Peterson.

[Jordan Peterson]

To be open to learning does mean, at least to some degree, always asking, what am doing wrong? What do I have to give up? What do I have to transform? That could be very painful. There isn't anything better that you can do with failure, no matter how unjust, than to learn from.

[Jay Shetty]

Listen to On Purpose with Jay Shetty on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Trust me, you won't want to miss this one.

[Unknown (Fiasco Podcast Host)]

It's hard to read the news these days without asking yourself, how did we get here? Fiasco is a history podcast from the co creators of Slow Burn. In our first season, Bush v. Gore, we examine an unmistakable turning point in American politics. The 2000 election, which resulted in a high stakes stalemate, ended with one of the most controversial rulings in Supreme Court history. So if you're trying to make sense of the present moment, check out Fiasco, Bush v. Gore. Listen on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.