Podcast Summary: Articles of Interest
Episode: Gear: Chapter 1
Host: Avery Trufelman
Date: October 22, 2025
Overview
The first chapter of the "Gear" season in Articles of Interest explores the intertwined history of American clothing and the military, unwrapping how militaria shapes what we consider "classic" style, why American manufacturing still survives, and how a national yearning for ruggedness has always been bound up with both war and nostalgia. Trufelman examines not only the chronology of uniforms but also the cultural, gendered, and political narratives sewn into the very seams of American “gear,” making sense of why everyone—civilian and soldier—now dresses in outdoor wear.
Key Discussion Points
1. Classic Menswear: Military Origins and Modern Brands
- Setting the Scene at Buck Mason (00:11)
- Host Avery Trufelman visits Buck Mason, a brand known for timeless "classic cool" American menswear, inspired heavily by vintage military surplus clothing.
- Designers meticulously copy old pieces, sometimes down to the stitch count, to graft “soul” onto new garments.
- "They're copying elements of these classic old clothes down to the tiny details" (Avery, 01:13)
- Militaria as the Bedrock of American Fashion
- Virtually all classic menswear archetypes—flight jackets, bomber jackets, field coats—trace back to 20th-century military surplus.
- "I think the majority, if not all of the industry subconsciously acknowledges how this is the archive." (Kyle Fitzgibbons, 02:50)
- Virtually all classic menswear archetypes—flight jackets, bomber jackets, field coats—trace back to 20th-century military surplus.
2. Manufacturing “Made in USA” and the Role of the Military
- Alex Goulet's Ethical Shopping Journey (03:31)
- Goulet details a decade-long personal project to only buy American-made clothing, culminating in the guidebook Crafted with Pride, cataloging US-made apparel brands.
- Discovery: Most US apparel manufacturing today survives thanks to military contracts upheld by the Berry Amendment (1941), which requires military clothing to be American-made.
- "The only reason these things are made in the US is Berry compliance." (Alex Goulet, 06:32)
- Many outdoor industry companies exist by also providing to the military.
- Mixed feelings about how so much innovation is rooted in violent or war-related needs, but acknowledges the military’s centrality to manufacturing infrastructure and technical advancement.
3. Why We're ALL Wearing Gear
- Rachel S. Gross on Societal Shifts (13:17)
- Trufelman moves into why Americans—regardless of need—now ubiquitously wear performance gear.
- Gross notes both practicality (weatherproof, functional) and the deeper historical-cultural quest for ruggedness, tied to American frontier nostalgia and masculinity.
- "It's about what meanings do people attach to the kinds of clothing that they wear… recovering the rugged masculinity of the American frontier." (Rachel S. Gross, 13:46)
- The shift to anti-fashion “practicality” in the 19th-century outdoors movement and how shopping for outdoor gear is a persistent contradiction in American culture—rejecting materialism yet always buying specialized “kit.”
4. The Historical Roots of Outdoor Gear: Fashion, Fantasy, and Colonization
- Buckskins, Guidebooks, and Identity Construction (17:07)
- 19th-century outdoorsmen idealized buckskin suits—aspiring to Native American and pioneer ruggedness, but mostly bought them (often from Native women), not made them.
- Shopping for gear, even while valorizing “craft,” was always part of asserting one’s American-ness.
- Early English colonizers’ adoption of “rugged” dress reflects a centuries-long tradition of performative toughness.
5. Development of the American Military Uniform
- From Buckskin to Blue: Revolutionary and Civil War eras (21:33)
- Joshua Kerner (military history enthusiast) and Trufelman trace the evolution from the hunting shirt (fringed linen smock inspired by Native dress) to blue woolen uniforms meant to invoke unity and visibility in battle.
- Mass production during the Civil War (“shoddy” origins) led to standardized sizes (S/M/L) and the rise of quality control (quartermasters, inspection stamps).
6. The Surplus Industry and Peacetime Pageantry
- Post-Civil War Surplus and Fancy Uniforms (31:48)
- Growth of military surplus market after the Civil War (e.g., Bannerman’s Castle).
- In periods viewed as "peace," uniforms trended more ornate (Prussian influences, plumes, gold), linked to collective anxieties about masculine vigor and national readiness.
7. Masculinity, Peace, and the Politics of War
- Teddy Roosevelt and the Crisis of Manhood (39:25)
- Exploration of Roosevelt’s transformation from frail urban child to archetypal rugged man, fueled by anxiety over “peace rot” and the closing of the frontier.
- "He must live the strenuous life." (Avery, 40:52)
- “New Women” emerge in political and public life, further stoking masculine anxieties.
- Arbitration versus war: women lead peace movements, which are derided as feminine and weak by war advocates.
- "Arbitration was, in other words, for pussies." (Avery, 49:41)
- The Spanish-American War conveniently revives the martial ideal and forges new American identity through conflict.
- Exploration of Roosevelt’s transformation from frail urban child to archetypal rugged man, fueled by anxiety over “peace rot” and the closing of the frontier.
8. The Spanish-American War, Colonialism, and Uniform Innovation
- From Blue to Khaki (58:58)
- Rough Riders and the adoption of khaki uniforms (British colonial influence) mark a new stage for US military dress—comfortable, camouflaged, better for overseas, colonial campaigns.
- Introduction of “olive green drab” and the influence of the outdoor industry on modern military clothing.
- War advances practicality and innovation in gear design—and connects to today's ubiquitous "gear" in civilian life.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
On Clothing's Military Roots
- "Almost all classic menswear is based on 20th-century militaria."
— Avery Trufelman (01:45)
- "Almost all classic menswear is based on 20th-century militaria."
-
On Berry Compliance and Manufacturing
- "There's hardly a reason an American factory would make thread without the military. It's just embedded in American garments."
— Avery Trufelman (06:40)
- "There's hardly a reason an American factory would make thread without the military. It's just embedded in American garments."
-
On Shopping for Ruggedness
- "It is sort of perversely fascinating that any trip into the outdoors starts with getting kitted up. You have to go shopping. You need all this stuff to do what ought to be the most natural thing."
— Avery Trufelman (18:51)
- "It is sort of perversely fascinating that any trip into the outdoors starts with getting kitted up. You have to go shopping. You need all this stuff to do what ought to be the most natural thing."
-
On Buckskin Pants and Fashion Cycles
- "The buckskin breeches became so popular in the colonies that the trend spread back to England."
— Avery Trufelman (20:08)
- "The buckskin breeches became so popular in the colonies that the trend spread back to England."
-
On Innovation from War
- "There’s a reason why Old Navy makes, like, a cheap imitation of these pants."
— Alex Goulet (03:15) - "The Internet was invented by the military. Name 30 products. Probably half of them were military inventions."
— Alex Goulet (07:01)
- "There’s a reason why Old Navy makes, like, a cheap imitation of these pants."
-
On Gender, War, and Peace
- "Arbitration was, in other words, for pussies."
— Avery Trufelman (49:41) - "I should welcome almost any war, for I think this country needs one."
— Quoting Theodore Roosevelt, Kristen Hoganson (50:08)
- "Arbitration was, in other words, for pussies."
-
On the “Strenuous Life” and National Identity
- "He must live the strenuous life."
— Avery Trufelman (40:52) - "It led to a new generation of military heroes. It rehabilitated the upper crust, Harvard educated, white collar Theodore Roosevelt-y type as model men..."
— Kristen Hoganson (54:54)
- "He must live the strenuous life."
-
On Modern Gear
- "The military and the outdoor industry are interwoven. The outdoor industry had a huge role in forming how the United States military looks. And the military in turn came to shape the outdoor industry."
— Avery Trufelman (07:55)
- "The military and the outdoor industry are interwoven. The outdoor industry had a huge role in forming how the United States military looks. And the military in turn came to shape the outdoor industry."
Timestamps for Key Segments
- 00:11–03:31: Buck Mason and the military origins of classics
- 03:31–07:55: Made-in-USA: Berry Amendment, ethical shopping, military contracts
- 13:17–15:55: Why Americans wear performance gear; outdoors as masculinity quest
- 17:07–18:51: Buckskin craft, shopping contradictions, outdoorsmen identity
- 19:57–21:27: Early American “rugged” style: buckskin breeches, hunting shirts
- 21:33–29:06: The evolution of US military uniforms: blue coats, mass production, "shoddy"
- 31:48–33:56: Surplus after the Civil War, peacetime ostentation in uniform
- 39:25–44:06: Teddy Roosevelt’s masculinity crisis, peace rot, and the closing frontier
- 47:46–50:21: Arbitration versus militarism; gendered politics of peace/war
- 54:11–58:54: Spanish-American War, new American identity, khaki uniforms
- 58:58–61:49: Outdoor industry influence, innovation, and the era of “gear”
Tone & Takeaway
Avery Trufelman’s tone is curious, lively, and at times darkly witty—blending cultural critique with storytelling. The episode threads together military history, class, gender, manufacturing, and memory, ultimately revealing that what we wear ("gear") is inseparable from broader American myths of masculinity, conflict, and self-reinvention. This isn’t just a clothing history—it’s a history of power, identity, and the paradox of American "practicality" as performance.
For images and more, visit articlesofinterest.substack.com