Podcast
Articles - USA Carry
Hosted by Articles - USA Carry · EN
Concealed Carry Resources & Tools for the Armed Citizen
18episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Trump Administration Restores CMP M1911 Sales Program After Pause During Biden-Harris Administration
Mar 21, 202500:04:24Tap to summarizeANNISTON, AL — The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) has officially resumed sales of surplus U.S. Army M1911 pistols, following an eight-month suspension during the Biden-Harris administration. The revival of the program came swiftly under President Donald Trump’s second term, with CMP reopening its order processing in late January 2025. CMP CEO Jerry O’Keefe shared a detailed update on February 26 outlining the current status of the program, order processing timelines, and inventory availability. The renewed effort marks a significant policy shift and reinforces the administration’s support for responsible civilian firearm ownership. Round Four Fulfillment Nears Completion CMP is currently processing the remaining 1,300–1,400 orders from the fourth round of M1911 sales, working at a pace of approximately 1,000 pistols per month. All Round Four orders are expected to be fulfilled by mid-April 2025. Orders are being processed in randomized number sequence, with only minor variances due to batch handling. New First-Come, First-Served Process in Place Going forward, the CMP has transitioned away from the previous “round” system. All new orders received in 2025 will be processed strictly in the order they are received. Fulfillment of these new orders is expected to begin in late April. A newly launched CMP M1911 Order Status webpage offers weekly updates and estimated fulfillment windows based on application dates. Lifetime Limit Holds, Expansion Sought The current lifetime purchase limit of two pistols per person remains in effect, as established by a Memorandum of Agreement with the Department of the Army. However, CMP leadership is actively working to increase this limit to four, potentially by summer 2025. First-time buyers may now purchase both pistols in a single order. In addition, CMP is planning to release rare or collectible M1911 models, including matched serial number M1 Garand and M1911 sets, through its auction platform later this year. Ample Inventory, More Pistols on the Way Despite being a finite and historic resource, CMP reports a healthy inventory of surplus M1911 pistols, with supply likely sufficient through 2026. An additional shipment from the U.S. Army is anticipated in the coming weeks, further supporting the program’s future. Background: A Program Revived by Pro-2A Leadership Originally authorized under the 2016 National Defense Authorization Act, the CMP M1911 program was designed to transfer up to 10,000 surplus pistols per year from the U.S. Army to the public. While the Trump administration first launched the program in 2018, it was paused in April 2024 amid an audit and policy shift under the previous administration. On January 29, 2025, the CMP announced the return of M1911 sales, crediting the Trump administration’s commitment to Second Amendment rights and historical preservation. The program’s resumption was accompanied by improvements, including a simplified ordering system and free shipping. This move has been widely welcomed by gun owners and collectors, not only for the opportunity to own a piece of U.S. military history but also as a reaffirmation of the role civilian marksmanship plays in national heritage and firearm safety. For details on eligibility and ordering, visit https://thecmp.org/sales-and-service/1911-information. Read the original story: Trump Administration Restores CMP M1911 Sales Program After Pause During Biden-Harris Administration
Transcribe →Bystander’s Armed Intervention Stops Stabbing Attack at New Hampshire McDonald’s
Mar 21, 202500:02:31Tap to summarizeNASHUA, NH – A bystander with a firearm intervened during a violent altercation involving a knife at a McDonald’s in Nashua, New Hampshire. On Tuesday night, a fight broke out between two groups who police believe knew each other, and it quickly escalated when 22-year-old Jose Vasquez repeatedly stabbed a 32-year-old man multiple times in the face and abdomen. Felix Marengo, a bystander eating in his car, witnessed the attack and intervened. He told WMUR reporter Maria Wilson, “A guy started getting stabbed. I got out of my car and took my handgun out. As soon as they saw that, the stabber started running behind Wendy.” Vasquez surrendered to Nashua police the following day, and he was charged with first-degree assault. Vasquez’s attorney said the victim was the initial aggressor, so it will be interesting to see what the final charges will be. If the person who got stabbed was the initial aggressor, there is a possibility the judge could determine Vasquez acted in self-defense. Nashua police stated that additional charges may be filed, pending the outcome of their investigation. This is a tricky situation for a concealed carry holder because unless you see an incident start, you don’t know who the real victim is and who the person who started it is. Most news articles failed to mention that a bystander with a firearm stepped in to stop the altercation, and this is a perfect example of why cases of self-defense involving firearms are significantly underreported. Read the original story: Bystander’s Armed Intervention Stops Stabbing Attack at New Hampshire McDonald’s
Transcribe →Armed Citizen Shoots Robbery Suspect During Early Morning Struggle in Midtown Memphis
Mar 21, 202500:02:28Tap to summarizeMEMPHIS, TN — An attempted robbery early Tuesday morning in Midtown Memphis ended with a suspect in critical condition after a resident defended himself with a firearm, according to the Memphis Police Department. Officers responded around 5:45 a.m. to reports of a shooting near 31 South McLean Boulevard. Upon arrival, they spoke with a man who stated he had just returned home when an individual attempted to rob him. According to police, the suspect confronted the man, and a physical altercation ensued. During the struggle, the man produced a firearm and shot the suspect. The injured suspect was transported to Regional One Hospital in critical condition. Authorities detained the 27-year-old shooter and one other individual at the scene for further questioning. As of the latest reports, no charges have been announced, and the investigation remains ongoing. Residents in the neighborhood expressed concern about the rising crime in the area and the need for community-based solutions. One neighbor voiced frustration over the lack of structure and opportunity for youth, emphasizing that safety requires not only law enforcement but also economic and spiritual support for the community. While every self-defense situation is unique, this incident underscores the importance of being prepared and aware, especially when arriving home during early morning hours. Situational awareness and a lawful means of protection can play a critical role in ensuring personal safety when confronted with a threat. Read the original story: Armed Citizen Shoots Robbery Suspect During Early Morning Struggle in Midtown Memphis
Transcribe →Democrats Push Magazine Capacity Limits Under Misleading ‘Keep Americans Safe Act’
Mar 20, 202500:04:07Tap to summarizeWASHINGTON, D.C. — Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) and 21 other Senate Democrats have introduced the “Keep Americans Safe Act,” a sweeping gun control bill that aims to ban standard-capacity magazines holding more than ten rounds. If enacted, this legislation would prohibit the sale, transfer, possession, importation, or manufacturing of these magazines nationwide, threatening the rights of law-abiding gun owners across the country. The Push for Magazine Bans The proposed legislation revives elements of the now-defunct 1994 federal assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004. Proponents, including Kaine, claim that restricting magazine capacity will reduce mass shooting fatalities, citing statistics from the Clinton-era ban. However, independent studies, including a 2004 report from the Department of Justice, found no conclusive evidence that the ban had any meaningful impact on crime rates or public safety. The bill includes provisions allowing law enforcement agencies to confiscate and destroy newly prohibited magazines while authorizing buyback programs. It also imposes strict serial number and manufacturing date requirements on any future production of magazines. A Direct Attack on the Second Amendment The “Keep Americans Safe Act” is a blatant infringement on the Second Amendment, stripping citizens of their ability to own commonly used and constitutionally protected firearm accessories. Standard-capacity magazines, which often exceed ten rounds, are widely used by millions of responsible gun owners for self-defense, sporting, and recreational shooting. The bill arbitrarily defines “large capacity” as anything over ten rounds, ignoring the reality that many handguns and rifles are designed to function with magazines holding 15 to 30 rounds. Criminals, by definition, do not obey laws, meaning this ban would only hinder law-abiding citizens from effectively defending themselves while having little to no effect on crime. Unconstitutional and Ineffective Banning standard-capacity magazines is not just unconstitutional but also ineffective. States that have implemented similar bans, such as California and New York, have seen no significant reduction in violent crime. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court’s Bruen decision reaffirmed that gun control measures must align with historical precedent, casting serious doubt on the constitutionality of such a sweeping restriction. Instead of targeting law-abiding gun owners, lawmakers should focus on enforcing existing laws, addressing mental health concerns, and prosecuting violent criminals. Restricting magazine capacity does nothing to deter crime but does everything to erode the rights of responsible citizens. What Comes Next? This legislation is likely to face strong opposition from Second Amendment advocates, Republican lawmakers, and gun rights organizations. Gun owners and supporters of the Constitution must remain vigilant and actively oppose this and any future attempts to erode their rights. With increasing attacks on the Second Amendment from anti-gun politicians, now is the time for Americans to stand firm and ensure their freedoms are not further eroded by ineffective and unconstitutional laws. Read the original story: Democrats Push Magazine Capacity Limits Under Misleading ‘Keep Americans Safe Act’
Transcribe →Pennsylvania Man Sentenced After Mistaking Instacart Driver for Intruder and Opening Fire
Mar 20, 202500:03:32Tap to summarizeNEWTON TWP., PA — A Pennsylvania man has been sentenced to six months in jail and over four years of probation after shooting an Instacart delivery driver outside his home earlier this year. The incident, which authorities say was based on a misunderstanding, left the driver seriously injured and highlighted the importance of properly identifying threats before using a firearm. The Shooting Incident According to police reports, the shooting occurred on the evening of January 20, 2025, at a residence on Misty Lane. Vanessa Sabo had placed an order through Instacart for grocery delivery but failed to inform her husband, Nicholas Sabo, 43. When Vanessa received a motion alert from a security camera near their utility trailer and vehicles, she mistakenly believed someone was attempting a break-in. She informed her husband, who retrieved his Glock 19 from upstairs. Without verifying the nature of the perceived threat, Sabo fired a single shot at the individual outside. The victim, 35-year-old Jerrie Wilchombe of Scranton, was struck in the leg. Wilchombe, who was making the delivery with his wife and daughter present in the vehicle, managed to flee the scene before being transported to Geisinger Community Medical Center, where he underwent surgery. Upon arriving at the scene, police found Nicholas Sabo in the kitchen, with his firearm placed next to a coffee pot. He admitted to shooting Wilchombe but did not provide a legal justification for doing so, according to South Abington Township Police Chief Paul Wolfe. Authorities confirmed Wilchombe was lawfully delivering groceries, supported by Instacart documentation provided by his wife, Jessica Thomas. Initially charged with reckless endangerment, Sabo later pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. On March 15, 2025, he was sentenced to six months in jail, followed by four and a half years of probation. Lessons from the Incident This case highlights critical self-defense considerations. First, firearm owners must ensure they correctly identify a legitimate threat before using lethal force. In this case, Sabo seemingly acted on his wife’s mistaken assumption rather than assessing the situation himself. Given that Wilchombe was not attempting to enter the home or displaying any threatening behavior, the use of deadly force was legally and ethically unjustified. Additionally, communication is key—had Vanessa Sabo informed her husband about the Instacart order, the entire situation could have been avoided. Situational awareness and responsible firearm use are paramount for anyone exercising their Second Amendment rights. Read the original story: Pennsylvania Man Sentenced After Mistaking Instacart Driver for Intruder and Opening Fire
Transcribe →Bills to Lower Firearm Purchase Age, Expand Carry Rights Advance in Florida
Mar 20, 202500:04:14Tap to summarizeTALLAHASSEE, FL — Several firearm-related bills are advancing in the Florida Legislature, reflecting continued efforts to adjust gun laws in the state. Three key bills—one lowering the firearm purchase age, another allowing off-duty law enforcement officers to carry weapons at certain events, and a third removing firearm restrictions during emergencies—have successfully passed committee votes and are now heading to the Florida House floor. Lowering the Minimum Age for Firearm Purchases House Bill 759 (HB 759) seeks to lower the minimum age to purchase a firearm in Florida from 21 to 18. If passed, it would allow 18-year-olds to buy long guns from licensed dealers and handguns from private sellers. This bill, sponsored by Rep. Michelle Salzman (R), passed the House Judiciary Committee by a 16-6 vote and is now scheduled for a full House vote. The Senate companion bill, SB 920, sponsored by Sen. Jay Collins (R), has three committee stops remaining before it can proceed to the Senate floor for a vote. For this measure to become law, either HB 759 or SB 920 must pass both the House and Senate in identical form before being sent to Governor Ron DeSantis for approval. Allowing Off-Duty Officers to Carry Concealed Weapons at Events House Bill 1021 (HB 1021) would allow off-duty law enforcement officers to carry concealed weapons into schools, colleges, and professional athletic events when attending as private citizens. Rep. Jeff Holcomb (R) is sponsoring the measure in the House, and Sen. Jay Collins (R) is carrying the Senate version (SB 1248). HB 1021 has passed through its necessary committees and is now set for a vote on the House floor. Meanwhile, SB 1248 still has three committee stops before it can reach the Senate floor. If the House and Senate pass different versions, lawmakers would need to reconcile them before the bill can proceed to the governor’s desk. Easing Firearm Restrictions During Emergencies House Bill 6025 (HB 6025) seeks to remove the automatic ban on selling and carrying firearms and ammunition during a declared local state of emergency due to potential violence or public disorder. Under current law, such restrictions are automatically enacted, limiting the rights of lawful gun owners. Rep. Monique Miller (R) is carrying HB 6025 in the House, while Sen. Blaise Ingoglia (R) is sponsoring the Senate version, SB 952. HB 6025 has cleared its committee process and is now headed to the House floor for a full vote. SB 952 has one remaining committee stop before it can advance to the Senate floor. What Happens Next? House Floor Votes: All three House bills (HB 759, HB 1021, and HB 6025) must be debated and voted on by the full House. Senate Committee Reviews: The Senate versions (SB 920, SB 1248, and SB 952) are still working through their committee processes. Final Passage & Reconciliation: If both chambers pass their respective bills, they must ensure the language matches before sending them to Governor DeSantis for approval. These legislative efforts highlight Florida’s ongoing focus on Second Amendment rights and self-defense measures. If passed, these bills could bring notable changes to the state’s firearm laws in the coming months. Read the original story: Bills to Lower Firearm Purchase Age, Expand Carry Rights Advance in Florida
Transcribe →Houston Homeowner Fatally Shoots Suspected Burglar Upon Return Home
Mar 19, 202500:02:21Tap to summarizeHOUSTON, TX — A suspected burglar was shot and killed Monday afternoon outside a residence in Houston after the homeowners returned to find him on their property. Houston police responded to a shooting call around 4:05 p.m. at a home on Bonnie Brae Drive, where they discovered an unresponsive male lying in the driveway. Houston Fire Department paramedics pronounced him deceased at the scene. His identity has not yet been confirmed by the Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences. According to the Houston Police Department (HPD), a preliminary investigation revealed that the suspect had been burglarizing the home while it was unoccupied. When the homeowners arrived, one of them armed themselves and shot the suspect. The homeowner, an adult male, was not injured. The Harris County District Attorney’s Office has been notified, and the case will be presented to a grand jury for review. Legal Considerations in Texas Self-Defense Cases In Texas, all homicide cases—regardless of circumstances—are referred to a grand jury for review. This does not necessarily indicate charges will be filed, as grand juries in Texas have historically been reluctant to indict individuals who use force against intruders committing a crime. While it remains to be seen whether prosecutors will pursue charges in this case, Texas law strongly favors the right of homeowners to defend themselves against criminal threats. Read the original story: Houston Homeowner Fatally Shoots Suspected Burglar Upon Return Home
Transcribe →Texas Bill Proposes Gun Safety and Hunter Education as Physical Education Elective
Mar 19, 202500:04:19Tap to summarizeAUSTIN, TX — A newly proposed bill in the Texas Legislature could allow public high school students to take a gun safety and hunter education course as part of their physical education curriculum. House Bill 1085, authored by Representatives Pat Curry and Helen Kerwin, aims to introduce a “lifetime recreation and outdoor pursuits” course that includes a hunter education component, providing students with valuable outdoor skills and firearm safety education. The bill was filed on November 12, 2024, and was recently considered in a public hearing before the House Public Education Committee on March 18, 2025. It remains pending in committee as lawmakers deliberate on its potential impact and implementation. Promoting Outdoor Education and Firearm Safety Representative Curry emphasized the importance of integrating outdoor activities and gun education into school curriculums. “It’s beneficial to have physical education that supports outdoor activities and can teach about guns and gun safety,” Curry told KXXV. The proposed course would satisfy the physical education credit required for Texas public school students, offering an alternative to traditional gym classes while equipping students with essential firearm safety knowledge. Addressing Hunter Safety Requirements The course would also pave the way for students interested in hunting by preparing them for state licensing requirements. “For children who want to get into hunting, you are required to get a license once you are 16 years old to complete a hunter safety course in the state of Texas and many states by the way. That hunter safety course in Texas transfers for the rest of your life,” Curry explained. With hunting being a significant part of Texas culture, the bill aims to ensure that young individuals receive proper training and education before handling firearms in outdoor recreational settings. Parental Approval and Implementation If passed, the bill would allow school districts to offer the course as an elective, ensuring participation remains optional. Parents would have to provide approval before students could enroll. The curriculum would be developed in collaboration with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, ensuring that all educational material meets state safety and conservation standards. Should the bill pass, the course could be available to students as early as the 2025-2026 school year. The bill requires a two-thirds majority vote for immediate effect; otherwise, it would take effect on September 1, 2025. A Step Forward in Firearm Education HB 1085 represents a significant step toward promoting responsible firearm education among Texas youth. By integrating gun safety into schools, students can develop a foundational understanding of firearm handling, hunting ethics, and outdoor recreation. This initiative aligns with broader efforts to ensure that individuals who choose to own or use firearms do so responsibly and safely. As the bill awaits further legislative action, it has garnered attention from both supporters and critics, with proponents arguing that such education could reduce accidental firearm incidents and better prepare young hunters for safe participation in outdoor activities. Potential Impact and Next Steps The bill remains in committee, and its future will depend on further legislative discussions. As lawmakers continue to review HB 1085, Texas residents can follow its progress and provide input through public hearings or by reaching out to their state representatives. Read the original story: Texas Bill Proposes Gun Safety and Hunter Education as Physical Education Elective
Transcribe →North Carolina Advances ‘Freedom to Carry NC’ Bill Allowing Permitless Concealed Carry for Residents 18 and Older
Mar 18, 202500:02:36Tap to summarizeRALEIGH, NC — On March 18, 2025, the North Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee approved Senate Bill 50, titled “Freedom to Carry NC,” which proposes to allow U.S. citizens aged 18 and older to carry concealed handguns without obtaining a permit. The bill now moves to the Senate Rules and Operations Committee for further consideration. Key Provisions of Senate Bill 50 The proposed legislation permits individuals who are U.S. citizens, at least 18 years old, and not otherwise prohibited by law, to carry concealed handguns without a permit. Despite this change, the bill maintains the current concealed handgun permit system for those who seek permits for reciprocity purposes when traveling to other states or for personal reasons. Legislative Process and Next Steps After its approval by the Judiciary Committee, Senate Bill 50 has been re-referred to the Senate Rules and Operations Committee. If it receives a favorable report there, it will proceed to the Senate floor for debate and voting. If passed by the Senate, the bill will move to the House for consideration. Governor Roy Cooper’s stance on the bill has not been publicly stated at this time. Pro-Second Amendment Perspective Senate Bill 50 upholds the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens by removing unnecessary barriers to concealed carry. Responsible gun owners should not be required to obtain permits to exercise their constitutional rights. Additionally, North Carolina would join 29 other states that have enacted similar “constitutional carry” laws, reflecting a growing trend toward permitless concealed carry across the nation. Read the original story: North Carolina Advances ‘Freedom to Carry NC’ Bill Allowing Permitless Concealed Carry for Residents 18 and Older
Transcribe →This North Carolina Shooting Highlights the Importance of Knowing Self-Defense Laws
Mar 18, 202500:03:35Tap to summarizeSPRING HOPE, NC — A North Carolina man has been arrested after he allegedly fired multiple rounds at a vehicle, striking a juvenile driver, following an attempted theft from his truck. The case serves as a stark reminder that responsible gun owners must understand the laws of self-defense—deadly force is only justified in response to an immediate threat of death or serious bodily harm, not to protect property or pursue suspects after the fact. Incident Details On March 14, 2025, shortly after 10:00 p.m., the Nash County Sheriff’s Office responded to a shooting on Savage Road. According to authorities, 30-year-old Zachary Bryant called 911 to report a theft from his truck. He later admitted to firing at a moving vehicle, striking a 15-year-old driver, who remains in critical condition. Bryant told police he was inside his home when he heard his dog barking. Upon checking outside, he saw two individuals running from his truck. The suspects got into a vehicle and drove away. Bryant then went back inside his house, put on clothes, retrieved a handgun and a flashlight, and returned to inspect his truck, discovering that tools were missing. Roughly 10 minutes later, Bryant spotted a red vehicle matching the description of the suspect’s car returning to the area. Standing near the road, he fired multiple shots at the passing vehicle, striking the juvenile driver. The car then crashed into a wooded area, where deputies later found four minors inside, ranging in age from 14 to 16. Legal Consequences Bryant has been charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon with Intent to Kill and Inflicting Serious Injury and Assault with a Deadly Weapon with Intent to Kill. Authorities were clear in their assessment: Bryant was not in immediate danger when he opened fire. North Carolina law (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-51.3) allows for the use of deadly force only when there is a reasonable belief of imminent death or great bodily harm. Since Bryant fired on a fleeing vehicle and was not facing an active threat, his use of force was not legally justified. The investigation remains ongoing, and charges are also being considered against the juveniles involved in the theft. Self-Defense and the Law This case underscores an important lesson for all gun owners: you cannot legally use deadly force to protect property or to stop a fleeing suspect. Once a threat has ended, firing a weapon—even at a suspect who has just committed a crime—can result in serious legal consequences. Lawful gun ownership carries the responsibility of understanding when force is legally justified. If you find yourself in a similar situation, call law enforcement and let them handle the pursuit. Acting outside the law, as this case demonstrates, can lead to criminal charges and tragic outcomes. Read the original story: This North Carolina Shooting Highlights the Importance of Knowing Self-Defense Laws
Transcribe →