Transcript
Alex (0:00)
My dad works in B2B marketing. He came by my school for Career Day and said he was a big roas man. Then he told everyone how much he loved calculating his return on ad spend. My friends still laugh at me to this day.
LinkedIn Advertiser (0:14)
Not everyone gets B2B, but with LinkedIn you'll be able to reach people who do. Get $100 credit on your next ad campaign. Go to LinkedIn.com results to claim your credit. That's LinkedIn.com results. Twitter terms and conditions apply. LinkedIn the place to be to be.
Dr. Michael Bird (0:39)
The Ask NT Write Anything podcast Hello there. This is Dr. Michael Bird from Ridley College in Melbourne, Australia.
Tom Wright (0:49)
And this is Tom Wright from Oxford in England.
Dr. Michael Bird (0:52)
Now, Tom, we've. We've known each other for a while. I think I first physically met you at a conference in Scotland. I think it was the Edinburgh Dogmatics Conference. It was the first time we, we. We met. And that was a fun conference. I remember it was Don Carson and Bruce McCormack, two scholars going back and forth at each other. But since then, we've cooperated on a large number of things, ranging from a New Testament introduction and more recently with forays into political theology, which, given current global events, I like to think is kind of relevant. A lot of them always seem to center on heaven, hell, resurrection or the end time. So we've got one question, Tom. This comes from Alex Hawkins. He's got a good one. He says, is God's judgment on sinners eternal conscious torment or annihilation or a combination of both? Well, I mean, that's a pretty hefty one to ask about, you know, hell and eternal conscious torment. These are things that people do have a lot of anxiety about. Tom, what are your thoughts on this topic?
Tom Wright (2:04)
Yeah, I've always been cautious about this because again and again, when the New Testament talks about some sort of imminent terrible judgment, it's actually talking about the upcoming destruction of Jerusalem. When Jesus says at the beginning of Luke 13 that what about these people who were killed by Roman soldiers in the temple? And what about these people who suffered death when the Tower of Siloam fell on top of them? Jesus says, unless you repent, you will all likewise perish. Now, there are thousands of sermons going back through church history saying, there you are, you've got to repent or you'll fry in hell when you die. Jesus was talking about Roman swords killing pilgrims and falling stonework in the immediate vicinity of the Temple. And as Luke is quite clear, these are fulfill when Jerusalem is destroyed by the Romans in AD 70. And so again and again the judgment is something that Jesus was warning about at the time, because it was about to happen. And actually Jesus, near contemporary, the historian Josephus, talks about telling people to repent. And he doesn't mean to have a religious conversion experience. He means to give up your crazy revolutionary ideas and let's work at the present political situation in a different way. Now I think Jesus meant more than Josephus, but I don't think it was out of that register. I think it was look at what's going on in the present state of affairs and give up these crazy nationalist militaristic ideas of overcoming the world and sending the Romans packing. Because if you don't, there will be dire judgment upon you. And actually what happened in Jerusalem in AD 70 was just as bad as any medieval vision of hell, if not worse. That's a whole other story. But what's then happened is that from the early Middle Ages onwards, Christian teachers picked up things which were really the ancient pagan visions of little demons waiting to grab you after your death. There are plenty of stories about this in ancient paganism and indeed that's why the philosophy we call Epicureanism happened, because Epicurus and his followers were aware that people were frightened of what was going to happen to them after death. And so they invented this philosophy of atomism which said we're just atoms and we'll just dissolve death. Said there's no hell, there's no nothing, there's nothing to be afraid of and nothing to look forward to either by the way. But that was a reaction against early pagan, not early, the paganism of the time, views of hell. And then the Middle Ages picked that up and made it more lurid and more extraordinary with great paintings of demons dragging people down to hell and so on. That so colored the medieval imagination that that was what was behind the protest of the reformers about how actually you were to be saved, etc, etc, but they never challenged that view, which was basically the medieval version of the earlier pagan view. What you find in the New Testament is much more restrained. And yes, there are warnings that unless you come the way of Jesus, then finally he or the Father will say, I never knew you depart from me, you workers of iniquity. So I don't think we can read the New Testament and be honest universalists, there are some people who still try to make that case at the moment. I just don't think it works. I think the New Testament does warn that there are real consequences to the moral and spiritual choices that we make in this life, and that these will last into God's new day. But part of the trouble with talking about hell is that people are still so easily fooled into thinking, thinking of heaven and hell as the basic categories of Christian eschatology, whereas the basic category of Christian eschatology is God's new heaven and new earth, the whole new creation. The question then is, what happens to those who in the present life say, I don't want to be part of God's new creation. I don't like the sound of it. I don't like the demands it's making on me. I'm not going to be part of that. C.S. lewis, in his book the Great Divorce, has this image of hell which I think answers to this, because his view of the great future that God has is of a robust new creation, of a world bursting and teeming with life. And then hell is a tiny, thin, insubstantial place that you could get to if you made yourself small enough to get down through this little crack in the earth. And if you go down there, it's real enough and it's miserable enough. And Lewis is very good at painting that. But it doesn't have the capacity, as it were, to blast, blackmail heaven and to say, as long as I'm here in hell, you shouldn't be enjoying yourself up there. It's what happens when people deny the God who is the creator and giver of all good things, and so find themselves deprived of all the things that make human life what it is. And in particular, and I argued this briefly in my book, Surprised by Hope and by the way, I wasn't going to write a section on hell in that book. And when it was quite late on in production, somebody said, you're talking about the final stage. You have to say something about hell. So I wrote rather quickly a rather brief account there, but it goes something like this. We humans are made to reflect God into the world. That's what it means to be image bearers, to reflect God's love and stewardship into the world and reflect the praises of creation back to the Creator. If somebody says, I don't want to do that, if somebody, they mightn't say it in that articulate way. But if somebody, by their actions, by their life, by everything that they are and do, is denying that the goodness of God should flow through them into the world, and denying that the worship of all creation should be brought before the God who made the world, then ultimately they are asking, please, can I stop being an image bearer? Which means Please, can I stop being a genuine human? I think the danger with some popular older pictures of hell is that they have full on human beings being tortured forever and ever. Whereas the picture I see then coming out of what the New Testament says about what it means to be human is of a creature who once was an image bearer and now is no more. So there's a sense of loss, a sense of something that might have been but isn't. And whether you call that creature in that situation still a fully human being and whether you talk about eternal torment, I don't see that as torment. I see it as just a tragic, sad loss. I should say it's very difficult to talk about this because I'm talking about people that I know and love, people who I know and love, who I wish would come to faith and to the fullness of Christian expression, but who seem at the moment to be holding it at bay. So I don't want to say, as some people do, oh yes, they're lost, they're going to hell, that's who they are. And happily we're in the other path. No, as soon as we do that, we are becoming proud and arrogant. So I have articulated this idea that ultimately God will say to all people, either you are an image bearer or you are declining to be an image bearer. And if you decline to be an image bearer, then that is a sense of loss which lasts. I don't see that as necessarily annihilation, although it does annihilate the humanness of the person involved. I think what we're talking about is the idea of a creature that once was human and has decided not to be anymore. And that is a real tragedy. But it doesn't then stand as an equal and opposite over against God's new creation. It's an opportunity that was there, that was not taken. That's probably as far as I can go.
