Stacey Abrams (9:19)

Thank you so much. I'm happy to be here.

Kenna (9:21)

Well, I appreciate you taking the time.

Stacey Abrams (9:22)

Yeah.

Kenna (9:23)

So I was introduced to you as this wunderkind who has fused music and technology and business and activism and real estate.

Stacey Abrams (9:33)

Do I pay that person? Do I pay that person?

Kenna (9:35)

You could.

Stacey Abrams (9:36)

I might be paying that person.

Kenna (9:37)

I could be a conduit.

Stacey Abrams (9:38)

Yeah.

Kenna (9:40)

But what I love to do is talk about what comes first. So for you, when you think about all of these identities, which one came first?

Stacey Abrams (9:47)

I'm an artist. That's my core. That's what I was born to do. I think everything else is a extrapolation from that. Right. The artist is, to me, someone who lives in the physics layer, who reaches into the void and comes back with something new and hopes to generate or elicit a response from the world, from their work, hopefully being heard or being seen or being known for that, but mostly just wanting to put something important into culture and maybe helping other human beings have a better experience. So, artist first, what was the first.

Kenna (10:27)

Work of art that you shared with the broader community that wasn't just something private for you? It was something that you thought needed to be part of a larger conversation.

Stacey Abrams (10:39)

Wow. You know what? That's a funny story. I was 14 and I was watching television and I hated what I saw. And so I decided I'd put together a three ring binder and outline a show I wanted to make. And then I lived in Virginia beach, so I literally drove to the Family Channel, which was around the corner, and I loitered until I could meet the head of original programming and talk to him about a show I wanted to make. And it was the first time I just felt like, oh, the worst thing he could do is say no. Right. Ended up selling two TV shows and being able to actually work through scripts and build ideas with them really kind of spawned this idea that, oh, I can do this, I can be an artist, I can be a creative, and I can be in the world doing this for the rest of my life. And it was such an inspired moment, but that's probably the first moment that I Found the, you know, I found the impetus, I guess. And then from there, it was maybe the first time I wrote a song and played it for someone and they didn't tell me it was crap.

Kenna (11:48)

Okay. I watch an inordinate amount of television. What was the name of the first show that you sold?

Stacey Abrams (11:52)

Hmm. That's the thing that didn't happen. The show wasn't made. Okay. But it was called so Real High.

Kenna (12:00)

Okay, tell me about it.

Stacey Abrams (12:01)

It might as well have been. Parker Lewis Never Loses meets Saved by the Bell. And it was a combination of this kind of animated performative short. It was a 30 minute format, but high school show. And it had all these different diverse characters, like an Ethiopian kid and a bunch of other kids in school trying to just make it through, like high school and stuff like that, but whatever. Didn't make. It didn't make getting made, you know.

Kenna (12:34)

You were ahead of your time.

Stacey Abrams (12:35)

Yeah, exactly. That's how I'd like to think of it.

Kenna (12:37)

Yeah. Well, speaking of being ahead of your time, one of the conversations we're having in popular culture, in community, is technology, and in particular the technology of AI. We know that technology has long been part of the lore of writers and creators, whether we're talking about Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Samuel Butler's Erawan, Isaac Asimov, who I adore, and his. We'll talk about his Laws of Robotics in a minute. But we also have an artist, Stephanie Dinkins, who has a series of conversations that she's having with a humanoid robot named Bina48. When you think about technology and AI, when did you first as an artist especially? I mean, you're, you're. Again, you were out selling shows at 14. So when did you first start thinking about the intersection of your art and technology?

Stacey Abrams (13:34)

I mean, I think movies did a lot of inspiring in that regard, like, you know, Kubrick's 2001 and Hal, but then everything from there to Bicentennial man or Transcendence or War Games, Blade Runner. I mean, there's so many moments in history, in the film history that kind of warned us. Terminator warned us about what's impending doom, and everyone being concerned about it then, but thinking it was so far away. Right. I don't think that AI really struck me, though, until probably mid-2000s, mid 2010s, because it started to be a part of the technology surrounding social media. And it was really a big part of how we were being trained to feed the beast, if you will. And that was something that really kind of struck me as like, oh, this is different. That's actually when I went off of social media. That's when I pulled down everything from social platforms and I just wanted to understand more what was happening to our data and what's happening to our existence after that. Obviously in the last couple years we've seen this kind of boom in the LLM world and how that really comes to life is really from the last five, seven years of big data being thrown together through what was really kind of the social media boom along with the Internet. And then of course the ability for the GPUs of the world to help us process all this data. We're kind of in this really interesting spot now. So that's kind of like the arc for me. But I've always been a nerd who tried to program when I was a kid. I'm into all of the A like you know, from everything from Atari to the computers. My dad would bring home from university, my dad was a professor and so he would bring home computers and I would try to figure out how to program based on the rule based considerations. But we're in a whole other world now.

Kenna (15:50)

Assembly required with Stacy Abrams is brought to you by Americans United for Separation of Church and State. Clean water, fresh air, our health, electricity. We tend to take for granted the things that matter most, like the separation of church and state. For more than 75 years, Americans United has been on the front lines defending your freedom to live and believe as you choose, so long as you don't harm others. But that right is not a given. Every day it seems like Christian nationalists are hatching new plots to force us all to live by their narrow beliefs. Backed by a billion dollar shadow network, this vocal minority is pushing their anti democratic agenda everywhere. But here's the thing. You can make a difference. Join Americans United for Separation of Church and State and their growing movement. Because church state separation protects everyone. Learn more and get involved at AU.

Stacey Abrams (16:51)

After investing billions to light up our network, T Mobile is America's largest 5G network. Plus right now you can switch keep.

Kenna (16:59)

Your phone and we'll pay it off up to $800. See how you can save on every plan versus Verizon and AT&T.

Stacey Abrams (17:06)

@T mobile.com KeepAndSwitch up to four lines.

Kenna (17:11)

Via virtual prepaid card. Allow 15 days qualifying unlocked device credit service ported 90 plus days with device ineligible carrier and timely redemption required. Card has no cash access and expires in six months. It's time to get the world talking.

Stacey Abrams (17:24)

About black lip brands.

Kenna (17:25)

We all have our favorites but we.

Stacey Abrams (17:27)

Can'T keep them all to ourselves. So if you're feeling a little black opal beauty, tell somebody if the lip bar gives you a lip for every drip, let them know. And if your hair is doing the do, shout that out, too. Join Walmart in shouting out your favorite black lead products, creating a new world of choices@walmart.com blackandunlimited.

Kenna (17:51)

So I'm going to go back to two things you said. One is you use the initialism LLM, which is large language models for people who are not coders from birth. Describe what that is.

Stacey Abrams (18:04)

So I'm also not a coder from birth, so this is very much new to all of us. Right. What LLMs do Large language models use? It's a lot like predictive text on your phone, right? You see a few words and then it gives you an additional word that you might have said or you might have thought of saying. Right? It is actually the assimilation of the Internet and all of our social information and syntax that's out in the world. And this new technology is basically allowing these predictive models to understand what you might say in parallel with what other considerations are out there that you might say, and then delivering it to you in context of how you have given it information. So it's not thinking, right? It's not a thinking, breathing thing. You shouldn't be afraid. It's not Arnold Schwarzenegger pulling up to your house. It's basically giving you back what you put into it. And it really is defined by how much what you put in and how you communicate. So that's a simpler way to communicate what it is.

Kenna (19:16)

So this weekend, my siblings and I, we have. We share TikToks, which I know is unusual.

Stacey Abrams (19:22)

Sharing TikToks.

Kenna (19:24)

It is one of our pastimes, and the one that made the rounds and led to a lot of conversation was the new iteration where you can feed a memo or a report to a chatbot and it produces a podcast. Have you seen that one yet?

Stacey Abrams (19:41)

No. I've heard of. There's one called Notebook LM or something where kids are putting up their actual textbooks and they'll actually create a podcast. Yeah, I've seen that. I've heard about it. At least. I haven't seen it yet.

Kenna (19:53)

Well, it's really interesting. It's mildly eerie. And part of what happens in the tiktoks we were sharing is that they reach a point where the two chat bots start talking about their own reality and their own existence as they come to recognize that they are not human. They're not thinking. I want to take it back to something you said about when you took yourself off of the Internet and all the social media and came back. What brought you back? And were you expecting to be in non conscious conversations with chatbots when you got back?

Stacey Abrams (20:30)

You know, my return to, and I'm not really fully returned to socialist at this point, my return to this moment is really on a creative level, acknowledging the challenges for my creative community. A lot of what I do is focused on artists and artist advocacy. So a great deal of my thought around the new advent of technologies that are allowing us to have these kinds of conversations is how does it allow us to optimize our experience? How does it help us buy time? How does it support us in our activity as we look forward? There's so many different permutations of how this might play out and no one knows what's next. But I do think that the idea of having a digital twin of who you are and how you might perceive personal context of yourself will be an interesting thing. Right? These LLMs you're talking to now are just reflecting the information you give them and the information they can find for you to answer your questions and help you get to where you want to go. It'll be interesting how that applies to when it knows you in a total sense. So I'm back to figure that out. You know what I mean? It's going to be wild.

Kenna (22:03)

Actually, part of your mission is, as you said, to think about the intersection of technology and artists, to think about their advocacy. And one of the ways this has become very real is the intersection of AI and streaming. So I grew up on owing lots and lots of money to Columbia, ran Columbia House Music because of the cassettes. That was in my way. I mean, that penny was really persuasive. And now we have streaming, which is a very different way for musicians in particular to have their music shared. But it also seems to be perpetuating a long standing challenge of those who put the music out into the world make a lot more money than those who put the music in the world.

Stacey Abrams (22:49)

Right?

Kenna (22:49)

And streaming has become one of the examples of how those who control the technology, and in this case it's AI that's helping identify who should be listening and the algorithm for what should go out. But you still have artists that are not able to make a living wage doing this work. When you think about the work that you do, talk a little bit about how you see technology in particular in the realm of musicians playing out and what we should be concerned about. And what gives you hope?

Stacey Abrams (23:23)

That's such a big question.

Kenna (23:24)

Well, you gotta fill a whole podcast.

Stacey Abrams (23:26)

Yeah, yeah, yeah, listen. It kind of goes back to what I love about you and your work and how you pursued your career. I see it as a pursuit for systemic change. Right. And I think we can deal with where we are and what has happened to date or without really considering how we got here. Or we can actually go back to how we got here and start to really think through where we can go with the systems that are in place. I think that, you know, I'm one of the first, one of the first artists that was on itunes. Probably one of the first people to support the idea of, you know, peer to peer platforms. Not because I thought that people were going to steal music, but because I thought that this is a better way for people to get music or to actually be able to find the music. And especially in my career, I've had many occasions where it was being limited by the gatekeepers of the industry. I think what we're looking at is, you know, the technologies that exist and the streamers that are out there and the deals they've done with the rights holders. There's always going to be this play towards catalog. It's no longer about the album or the music that an artist is putting out for a major label or major partner. It's really about driving people back to a platform that allows them to listen to catalogs of music related to that talent and others. Right. The living wage part of it is really critical. And how the system is set up, it's almost. It's a real challenge for streamers to pay more the way that it's set up. But how do you actually get to change that? It's going to be through leverage. And that's the one thing we don't have because we are the most microserviced industry in the world, I think, and we kind of reflect the global economy. We're top 1%, a gigantic chasm. And then everyone else. Right. And so when you're looking at how these things will play out, it comes down to whether or not we are actually acknowledging that the system itself was built a certain way. And we have to deal with the core aspects of that first. And that comes down to how we're accessing resources. And it's not from the community or the fans or the people, but actually from the banks, from the government, from all the different systems that are in place that we don't actually know. For example, people don't know that for every $1 invested in the arts, there's a $7 rate of return. So taxpayers don't know to ask for their money back. Right. By investing in the things that actually do benefit us. So I don't know that we're gonna be able to change what it is now as a streaming world as it is now, unless we're dealing with the core of the issue first. And that's really how we are collectively together on any concept or idea.

Kenna (26:42)

One of the reasons I was so excited to have you is that I've long admired your ability to be a translator and an ambassador who can move across these worlds. And one of the goals of this podcast is to make certain our audience gets not just the tools they need. We have a toolkit at the end, but that they have the language they need to navigate what they're hearing. So you just used a term that I think is a really important one as we move through these conversations. You talked about microservice, which is contrasted with monolith. Can you talk a little bit about what those two concepts mean, especially in terms of the arts?

Stacey Abrams (27:18)

Yeah, I mean, look, I'll. I guess the best way to look at it is we've always. I mean, for a long time, there were only so many media outlet There were only so many media outlets and so many ways to receive content of any kind, right? And it was gatekept by networks and labels and, you know, any distribution mechanism that existed that was. It was pretty simple until we got to the 2000s and we started to find social media come into play. MySpace was a very big piece of that. That's part of my history. And then we started to really find that these things could be broken up. I'll give you MySpace as an example, right? MySpace was the end all, be all. It was the hub. We all went there and built our little websites and did whatever we had to do. But then Twitter took the statement part of it, Facebook took the friends part of it, and Instagram took the photos part of it. And it all got decentralized, right? It was no longer a monolith. It became more microservice through these other technologies. WhatsApp for communication, et cetera. What we're dealing with as an industry is that we all are small businesses. Every artist is a business. Musicians especially, start with four or five major, you know, industries of their own, businesses of their own. They have their masters, their publishing, they have their merch, they have their touring. And each one of those businesses, we're not Taught that we're entrepreneurs at that point, we're taught that we're musicians. And you know, what you have to do with that is get it to the world. But how. And those are the things we're not educated in. Financial literacy, that kind of stuff is, is core to us being able to acknowledge our business as a whole and then being able to start to plug into these bigger systems. Major agencies, major partners of all kinds, they're there to support us, but they're also subjectively supporting because it's based on how much money they can make. And that's their job. Our job is to figure out how we can plug into it and, and do it authentically and reach our audiences. So that in itself is a big challenge across the board. We are no longer in a position where we are really aligned with each other. We are aligned for our businesses trying to accomplish something. I think it's going to be interesting how AI and technologies, and I'm building one now that's in stealth. That will allow us to actually be individual entities with our industry and our business, but aligned with each other. That's the interesting thing I see for the Future and how LLMs and technology will allow us to be strategic with the data we generate because we are the generators. It's not like I said, we reach into the void. So how do we partner with each other to do that?

Kenna (30:21)

Okay, well just tell me you said this in stealth. What are you working on?

Stacey Abrams (30:27)

Oh, yeah. No one's listening, right? No one's listening. No, listen, I wish I could, I can say that what I'm building has an egalitarian tone. A lot of another challenge for us as artists, whether you're an athlete, I consider athletes, artists, actors, comedians, musicians or authors. Right. We all have this. We've been taught from the beginning to be afraid and greedy. Like that's a part of our.

Kenna (31:02)

Unpack that for me.

Stacey Abrams (31:03)

Yeah, so, you know, be afraid that you will not have a chance, that you may never be successful. Hold on to every penny. Don't pay for dinner, make sure someone else does. Try to figure out how to hold on to everything. Because you're uncertain of your future. You live in this uncertainty and this insecurity as a talent. And the world doesn't understand that because you have to give a different facade.

Kenna (31:31)

Right.

Stacey Abrams (31:31)

You have to look the part, be the part, act the part. And that is a very significant dichotomy to maintain. And so with that in mind, we are afraid. We are a little bit, you know, tight fisted and that in Itself really kind of puts us in a difficult position to meet opportunities with an open mind and an open spirit towards what happens, what can happen for us. I mean, at least that's how I perceive things.

Kenna (32:04)

Well, you were kind enough at the top of this conversation to mention the way I approach the world, which is to think about systems and how do we structure systems, how do we reform systems, how do we understand them and deconstruct them so we figure out where our power can be. You have done so much work around advocacy writ large from the vantage point of an artist, when someone's listening to this podcast, thinking, well, what does this have to do with me? I don't see myself as an artist. One way I talk about it is, and you alluded to this earlier, arts and culture are one of the top 10 drivers of US GDP. We make money from this. We, we make livings, millions of jobs are created. So talk to the person who is still listening to this podcast, thinking, so tell me what I need to know about why this matters when I'm worried about how society will form and expand and survive.

Stacey Abrams (33:00)

Oh, that's great. Okay, good question there, too. You're hitting me in the head with these. Look, I look at, you know, we look at what happened in the last 10 years as it relates to the media world. What you can consider as the fourth estate, I think the copy paste culture of journalism, all the things that have happened to blogs and the misinformation, disinformation, all the things that are happening in that space. There is a fifth estate, and I believe those are the storytellers and the artists and the creatives who actually help mankind be better humans. You know, you're a writer, you're a novelist, you have all of these incredible stories that you're putting into the world that to some degree or another have, you know, is based in reality of some kind, right? So that we can actually believe and we can be a part of that. All the characters you build, all the narratives you build, those things allow people to believe in a future, right? Musicians and artists who make music that relate to any individual, young or old, in key moments to help them understand who they are, where they are, how they are. It's such a powerful mechanism. And the artists, right, we're not talking about influencers here, we're talking about artists. And I believe those are the people who are in the creator economy, the actual creator economy. Those people need to be supported and sustainable in order to maintain that level of being an observer or being a creative who's building out these stories and delivering them to the world. Because that's how any consumer, any person in the world will actually have an escape, have a chance to assimilate, to process what's happening to them. So the movie Terminator made us afraid of AI well, it also made us go, what are we doing about this AI thing? Right? And the same thing goes with, you know, old TV shows that lead to, you know, who becomes president in a lot of ways. Like, there's. We all have actually been a part of how great stories lead us to how we believe and what we believe. And so it's important for all of us to acknowledge that the best creators, the most important people who fight to be great at what they do, put in their 10,000 hours. Those people need to be supported in ways. And it's hard because you're like, I pay for my Spotify. I do what I'm supposed. I go to the shows and I do those things. And I don't believe it's their responsibility. I believe the responsibility is in the advertising world, okay? I believe that brands are responsible. They spend a lot of money on social media and they spend a lot of money with Meta. You know, Meta made $265 billion and paid creators a billion. And most of the people who were paid out of that billion were not actually creators. They were influencers. That's where this really lives. It lives in the $600 billion beast of the advertising world, who derive a lot of their concepts and ideas and marketing concepts in the world off of the greatest storytellers. And being able to have them be responsible and focus on the best creatives in the world to make sure they are sustainable is actually something that's important. They need to be focused on authorizing, having authorized access to our data and information. And I have thoughts about that. I can tell you more.

Kenna (36:53)

Tell me more.

Stacey Abrams (36:54)

Ah, so just think about this, right? AI let's go back to AI for a second. One of the things that. That really troubled me when I was working at MySpace, when Timberlake took MySpace over, one of the things that really got me was learning about the data warehousing and how we acknowledge all of the information that social networks have. You started to realize that there was this dance for influencers and brands started to realize they needed to have access to our audiences. We're leasing space on these platforms. We have an account, but we don't own it, don't own the data behind it. We don't do anything but talk to our fans there. But that information is really being aggregated. There are platforms in the world, influencer platforms in the world that have now sold for half a billion dollars, a billion dollars to major hold co's and advertising businesses and media businesses that will take Stacey Abrams name and put it into their tech and then they'll create a cohort of Stacey Abram like people who will actually post and tweet with similar audiences to your audiences, but you will not benefit. That applies to every single artist in the world who have generated and worked so hard to have authentic relationships with their audiences. And yet the influencers will get paid for all of our work. That's the kind of thing that has to be curbed. That's where the major brands and partners that are out there spending money billions on that need to be educated and supported in learning how to aim their dollars at the right people and the right artists.

Kenna (38:34)

It's often been the role of Congress to intercede to say, we've let you run amok long enough and we're now going to rein you in. And we know that Representatives Rashida Tlaib and Jamal Bowman introduced legislation, the Living Wage for Musicians act, just recently.

Stacey Abrams (38:52)

Yeah, exactly.

Kenna (38:53)

Representative Bowman unfortunately won't be returning to Congress and legislation takes a while to move. But when you think about the next legislative initiative, how do you strike the balance between not wanting to limit technology but wanting to protect artists? What's that balance that you look at? What's the way you think? If you're talking to some congressional folks who are listening to this, what should they be thinking about when they're trying to solve this problem?

Stacey Abrams (39:25)

I mean, there are a lot of smarter people than I am that. Are you sure to actually to speak about? I'm positive. There are a lot of really amazing people who are considering each aspect. My challenge is that there isn't an intersectionality to the thought. What matters to a comedian or a musician is less likely to matter to an actor or an athlete. But there are central functions or considerations for all creators and creatives that are really important to the bottom line of how they're able to generate income and revenue. And I think that when you think about policy, it has to be transformative in the core. Right. Because I think everything else will fall in place. You don't want to limit technology. The reality is we are going to. It is going to happen anyway. I mean, I was in 2019, Google achieved quantum supremacy and the Sycamore chip was able to do something a supercomputer couldn't do in 10,000 years. In 200 seconds. And then the question was, where did the computations go? And then automatically it was this lateral consideration of dimensionality. And one of the guys went up and asked the question, what happens to VR with this new technology in the next 10 years? And the guy had a picture of Arizona where we were, and it was mountains and flowers and things. And he was like, oh, maybe in 10 years you could walk into that photo and smell that flower. Technology's coming. Neural networks mapping the brain. All these things are going to happen. What we want to do is make sure that the creative community is the author of the stories that allow mankind to absorb that kind of information. We're already dealing with so much. Eight billion people, global economies, all of these things are a challenge for mankind. This could be an existential threat or it can be something that we are able to assimilate and have be a part of our lives. And I think we have to look at the latter and try to make that happen. It's better over here now. At T Mobile get four 5G phones on us in four lines for $25 a line per month when you switch with eligible trade ins, all on America's largest 5G network.

Kenna (42:09)

Minimum of 4 lines for $25 per line per month with auto pay discount.

Stacey Abrams (42:12)

Using debit or bank account.

Kenna (42:13)

$5 more per line without autopay plus taxes and fees and $10 device connection charge phones via 24 monthly bill credits.

Stacey Abrams (42:18)

For well qualified customers.

Kenna (42:19)

Contact us before canceling entire account to continue bill credits or credit stop and.

Stacey Abrams (42:22)

Balance on a required finance agreement. Due bill credits end if you pay off devices early. CT mobile.com One morning you just walk.

Kenna (42:29)

In with a bag of everyone's faves.

Stacey Abrams (42:30)

From McDonald's, drop it on the counter and say breakfast is on me.

Kenna (42:35)

Boom.

Stacey Abrams (42:35)

That's the power of saving Money on the McDonald's app. Hope you can handle all that. Save money with the app and participate in McDonald's must opt into rewards.

Kenna (42:44)

It's time to get the world talking.

Stacey Abrams (42:46)

About black lip brands.

Kenna (42:48)

We all have our favorites, but we.

Stacey Abrams (42:49)

Can'T keep them all to ourselves. So if you're feeling a little black opal beauty, tell somebody if the lip bar gives you a lip for every drip, let them know. And if your hair is doing the deuce, shout that out too.

Kenna (43:01)

Join Walmart in shouting out your favorite black lead products.

Stacey Abrams (43:04)

Creating a new world of choices@walmart.com blackandunlimited.

Kenna (43:14)

So Isaac Asimov is one of my favorite authors and to purist, I'm about to butcher the Three laws of robotics. I know I'm not getting them perfectly right. Please forgive me, but yeah, we're both.

Stacey Abrams (43:26)

Going to have that problem.

Kenna (43:26)

Exactly. So the three laws are essentially one, robot should not harm, do no harm.

Stacey Abrams (43:31)

Yeah.

Kenna (43:31)

Two, that robot should obey the orders of their humans. And then three, they should protect their own existence unless doing so requires that they break law one or two.

Stacey Abrams (43:41)

Right.

Kenna (43:42)

What are the three laws of technology when it comes to creators? If you get to write those laws.

Stacey Abrams (43:48)

Ooh, you really are going hard right now. These questions.

Kenna (43:55)

I get to have these conversations all the time.

Stacey Abrams (43:56)

I know, I know the three laws.

Kenna (44:00)

You can do two if you want.

Stacey Abrams (44:02)

I think, you know, when you think about do no harm in the robotic sense, I think that I would maybe not make it so that it's a do not do. I think it should be laws to empower.

Kenna (44:19)

Okay.

Stacey Abrams (44:20)

I think that the first law should be to always. I'm just thinking that there should be a way to always provide sustainability for your greatest storytellers.

Kenna (44:33)

Okay.

Stacey Abrams (44:36)

Although that's subjective. I think that there are ways to use the data and information that lives in the world to acknowledge who those people are.

Kenna (44:44)

Okay.

Stacey Abrams (44:45)

You can't have, you know, 8 billion Nobel Prize winners. Right. The second thing I think would be always to support the creative education of those who pursue that work. Right. I think that would be the second law. And maybe the third law would be to always give and have some distribution mechanism for the most underestimated and unknowns. Right. I think some of the most powerful, most ambitious people in the world who've created the greatest change in the world are anonymous. So we have to make room for that type of, for that kind of work to be heard and seen. But that's a really hard question. Stacey Abrams.

Kenna (45:39)

Well, you did a really good job with it.

Stacey Abrams (45:41)

Thank you.

Kenna (45:42)

So I've got two last ones and they're gonna be pretty easy.

Stacey Abrams (45:45)

Okay, go for it.

Kenna (45:45)

So one 14 year old K in 2024, where is he lurking so he can create change right now? Whose office is he sitting outside of having pedaled his bike there or ridden a scooter? What's the next thing that is unjust in the arts that need to be fixed and K is there to make it happen?

Stacey Abrams (46:09)

Oh, that might be my favorite question you asked me. You know, I was reckless as a kid because I knew that my mom and dad had my back and then I could go home after getting a rejection. 14 year old K now is really focused on institutions that have the power to do exactly what I said. Those Three laws should do. To me, that's a bank, and it's also the biggest bank in the world. And it has to be a bank that, you know is going to be there in a global sense for the economy as a whole. Right. And they have to be educated, they have to be taught why and how they benefit as well as the world for supporting the type of artists that I'm talking about. And that's very. That's the very core of the technology I'm building. And it's. It's very close. I would say maybe by the time this podcast airs, I will have actually crossed the threshold into what I'll announce next year.

Kenna (47:37)

Awesome.

Stacey Abrams (47:38)

With one of them. So I think that's where I feel like the most power is. They're the ones who. We as artists have never been close to resources in that way. We're always one step removed. You know, if you go back in time and you look at and think about an aristocrat who would have Mozart playing in his home, it would be so that he would be able to have the mayor there and shake hands with him for an infrastructure deal. Mozart never benefited from that infrastructure deal. But we set the environment for those deals to happen. And my mission is to create a mechanism and an apparatus, a vehicle for us where we can be acknowledged for that intangible, and to be given the ability to get to know ourselves, to get to know the people around us who support our visions and fight for us, and then also to get to know the opportunities that are in the world that would not normally be surfaced. And I think a major institution, a bank, houses a lot of those opportunities. And I think that's where I see the future.

Kenna (48:50)

Well, my last question was going to be what are you dreaming of? But I think we've already heard. So, yeah, Kay, this has been delightful and my pleasure. Wonderful. And I am grateful for your time.

Stacey Abrams (49:00)

No, I'm grateful for you. And I'm actually grateful for you. You are a light and a beacon. I love the Assembly Required podcast for what you're attempting. My dad gave me a note he passed a few years ago, but he gave me a note a few years before that. And it basically talked about how he's proud of me for my ability to move in an unquestionable way. But down at the bottom, it said in his very professor like way, it had a red grading paper, red note that said note, you are still under construction. And I really feel like what you're doing here with assembly required is acknowledging that we're all under construction and we have a lot to do to make change. But it starts with having these conversations, so I appreciate you for that.

Kenna (49:52)

Well, now that I have my new best friend, yeah, I'm with it. This is delightful. Thank you so much.

Stacey Abrams (49:58)

Pleasure. Thank you.

Kenna (50:01)

Each week we want to leave the audience with a new way to respond to what might feel inevitable. That means finding an opportunity to make a difference and a way to get involved or just to get started on working on a solution. In a segment we like to call our Toolkit, at Assembly required, we encourage the audience to be curious, solve problems, and do good. Let's start with being curious. Be sure to read the terms and conditions of your favorite social media site and streaming platforms. Look, I'm not singling you out individually, but most folks don't read them before signing up. The devil is not only in the details, it's in the fine print. Next, solve problems. Support your favorite musician's music directly, not just through streaming, whether that looks like purchasing their material off of itunes or Bandcamp, or picking up physical media like vinyl CDs or these retro things we called cassettes. Buying albums guarantees your favorite artist bigger payouts than streaming on average. Until the system is addressed, we have to write the system. So start a little revolution where you are. Finally, do good. Buy some merchandise from your favorite visual artist or creators, visit their websites, or use the Autumn and this podcast as an excuse to go to a fair or a market and invest in the arts right where you are. If you want to tell us what you've learned and solved, send us an email@assemblyrequiredrooked.com or leave us a voicemail and you and your questions and comments might be featured on the pod. Our number is 213-293-9509. In fact, we've had a few questions from our audience, and more than a few about ranked choice voting and other voting alternatives. Kevin Richard Patterson at Gmail asked, would awarding electoral votes proportionally like how delegates are awarded, be a worthwhile intermediate step in that direction? It would more closely represent the popular vote. Now, this idea comes up periodically, but it's very complicated politically. In fact, the recent debate over Nebraska system, one that allocates electoral College votes by district, is a good example, as many of the state's Republicans strongly want to get rid of the second District's ability to diverge, but not enough to agree on how to actually do it. This kind of gaming of electoral votes would come up if some states were allowed to use proportional allocation of electoral votes and the rest were not. There's also the issue of gerrymandering and how that would affect the allocations. So bottom line, even if all states were to shift to the system used by Maine and Nebraska, the result would not be as responsive to the goal of the majority actually picking the President as would the national popular vote plan. Please keep sending in your questions and let us know what topic is tickling your brain. We might make it a focus for an upcoming episode that wraps up this episode of Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams. Meet you here next week. Assembly Required with Stacey Abrams is a Crooked Media production. Our lead show producer is Stephen Roberts and our associate producer is Paulina Velasco. Kira Paulaviev is our video producer. Our theme song is by Vasilis Photopoulos. Thank you to Matt DeGroote, Kyle Seglin, Tyler Boozer, and Samantha Slosberg for production support. Our executive producers are Katie Long, Madeline Herringer and me, Stacey Abraham. At Capella University, we believe accessible education can make a difference in people's lives. That's why we offer scholarship opportunities to all eligible students. Whether you're considering a bachelor's, master's, or doctoral degree, our teams will walk you through the process and help you get the savings you are eligible for. Furthering your education is an investment in yourself. Entonces kistas, esperando unfuturo de ferente estamaserca de lo cast. Learn more@capella.edu.