
Loading summary
A
The following podcast contains accounts of child sexual assault. Listener discretion is advised. Tara Brown, senior reporter for 60 Minutes, joins us to unpack the Epstein files. We focus on her documentary, the Inside the Epstein Files, exploring the network and influence of Jeffrey Epstein, the experience of survivors and the fallout after his death. That documentary is available on nine now and also on Stan. In exciting news for us, this interview will also air nationally on our brand new KISS FM radio show. It's called True Crime Tonight and it's on every Sunday around Australia at 6pm this is Australian True Crime. We acknowledge the traditional owners of the land on which this podcast is created, the Wurundjeri Woi Wurrung People of the Kulin Nation.
B
I don't want to make it sound like it's an explainer, but in a way that's what it evolved into. We certainly couldn't cover everything that had been dumped in the Epstein files.
A
My daughter is saying to me, they killed children, they killed babies. And I'm saying, darlie, no, I don't believe that. But I think there is a feeling of things that we thought couldn't be true have turned out to be true.
B
Right now in New Mexico, following a tip, there's allegations that there were two young girls who died during violent sex on Epstein's ranch. And that's an allegation, so it is yet to be verified or even investigated properly. But, you know, sadly, as your daughter's identified, that is not, perhaps not far from the truth. In the past, you'd go, that's ridiculous, and let's move on. And there is a lot of ridiculousness in this. I think there are lots of extraordinarily outlandish allegations and tips, and that's part of the issue with the Epson files working through that. But the fact that there is a sense of possibility is something kind of new. If you can remove yourself in some way from the more crazy conspiracies, because the truth itself is terrible.
A
Is there any evidence that Jeffrey was offending before he and Ghislaine teamed up together? Do you think this could have happened without her?
B
That's a good question, Sherlyn, and I'd be lying if I knew the answer to that. I'm just trying to think of the dates because there's some suggestions that he was abusing girls as early as 1985.
A
And I know there's conjecture about when he and Ghislaine met, but I think
B
that was before they met. And certainly the tendencies to sort of be inappropriate around young women was evidenced by people at the school that he taught at in Dalton in New York City, an incredibly prestigious school. But the commentary from that was that he made people feel uncomfortable. Look, I think that Jeffrey Epstein was very capable of assaulting young women, and he had a penchant for it, I think, well before Ghislaine Maxwell came on the scene. And he continued well after she left.
A
I think one of the pieces of information that's sort of floated to the top in the Epstein files being made public is the email in which Ghislaine confirms that that photograph of Virginia and Prince Andrew and Ghislaine taken in her house in London is legit after years of claiming that it wasn't.
B
Oh, it was huge. And I think I was kind of surprised and a bit disappointed that it didn't capture the headlines as I imagined it would. You know, the dispute about the photograph captured the headlines. The former Prince Andrew was, you know, was happy to call Virginia a liar. And so was Ghislaine Maxwell. From an interview in jail. She said she knew she was lying. What this photograph proved was that they were lying. Virginia was telling the truth all along. I mean, it's just so sad that Virginia isn't around to see that.
A
You alluded to a few minutes ago the difference in Jeffrey Epstein's life to those of the young women that he was preying upon. But his life wasn't always. He wasn't born into that, that money. One of the questions that sort of remains is how did he get there? How. How did he make it from a working class kid in Brooklyn to a billionaire?
B
Well, I think it started really back when Epstein was a kid living in Brooklyn. And what I mean by that is that he somehow was either born with or learned the tools of being able to take a lot of money from seemingly sophisticated investors and businessmen. You know, the New York Times has done some great work on this, and what they say they've uncovered is a man with an incredible, possibly an unrivaled ability to lie and driven to be wealthy. So in those, as you identified, he came from kind of a working class background. He didn't go to any special schools or universities, but he had this drive to get out of that neighborhood, and he had a drive to be rich, according to people who went to school with him. And he set himself on a trajectory of making contacts. He seemed to understand that to get far in this world, in the world he wanted to be in, it came down to who you knew. And so he was very adept at making those connections. And he was very adept at scamming and lying and selling himself as some sort of financial whiz. He just sort of seemed to have a play going on all the time.
A
How does that then play into the. Again, is this a theory or is this fact? Do we know? Is there any evidence that he was extorting people, that he was befriending people, either getting secrets from them or actually filming and recording them in awkward scenarios and then blackmailing them? Is that a fact or is that another theory?
B
Well, it's a theory at this point. And in fact, while that theory is being very popular, there doesn't yet seem to be any evidence of that. Certainly a sex trafficking ring. Yes, but in terms of blackmailing influential people, I don't know that you can say it didn't happen, but so far, there's no evidence it did.
A
That's one of the theories around the Wexner money, isn't it? That somehow, through some scenario, he's extorted money out of Wexner, the founder of Victoria's Secret. Was Jeffrey stealing from him, or was Wexner a co conspirator? Was there an arrangement between them? How did so much of Wexner Wexner's money end up in Jeffrey's possession?
B
Well, I think it starts, again, it has parallels with how he was able to sexually abuse so many young people, because I think the relationship with Les Wexner to begin with was one of trust and friendship. And Jeffrey Epstein sold himself as a financial whiz. He was the only guy who knew what was going on. And he could find all those missing assets that your other advisors have lost, that he could bring something new. And I think as a businessman, Les Wexner was very attracted to that. And again, Jeffrey Epstein was very good at selling himself. And so we have a situation where Epstein becomes pretty much Les Wexner's sole financial advisor. He is given power of attorney, which means that he can make lots of financial decisions on Les Wexner's part. Now, in 2019, Les Wexner claims that he was tricked by Jeffrey Epstein, that he'd been lied to, that Epstein had stolen lots of money from him, and that it was a terrible mistake. But we've also learned from the Epstein files that Les Wexner had been named as a co conspirator by the FBI and the Department of Justice. What we don't know is why. That went nowhere.
A
You introduced us to a fellow I was not expecting, a Republican congressman from Kentucky who is. Seems to be the spearhead of the fight to keep the files in the news to actually bring about some real resolution to this situation. Tell us about him.
B
Yes, so Thomas Massie is the co author of the Epstein Transparency Act. And so effectively he and a Democrat congressman made sure that these Epstein files were released. And that's what the act essentially and in a very simple way does. So he was saying there are all these files and they need to be released. It was a promise made by Donald Trump to do so. And Thomas Massie has made sure and is fighting for them to be released. And you know, really bringing to account the Department of Justice for basically hiding the names of potential co conspirators and revealing the names of many of the survivors who wish to remain anonymous.
A
You've just led us into a good area which is the redaction of names in the files. We see so many files redacted and most importantly the names of people who are sending emails to Jeffrey and whom he is replying to. And there are some really disturbing, some classics that are all over the Internet. Someone writes him an email saying I loved the torture video but we don't know who that email is from. Someone wrote one saying thank you for a fun night, your littlest girl was a little naughty. And again, we don't know who sent that email and it's incredibly frustrating.
B
Yeah. So I mean Thomas Massey and his supporters are pushing for those names to be revealed and they say that in some cases they do know who those people are. The defense of not revealing their names. In some instances it's. Well, in the case of the naughty one, the suggestion is that that was actually written by a woman, which does not mean that that is not a co conspirator but in somehow, in this very confusing way they've just automatically redacted the author of that email. There are redactions that were made by the FBI and Thomas Massie is calling for those redactions to be removed. And then there are redactions made by the Department of Justice. And it does seem that there are in some cases there are good reasons for that. In other reasons it just, it's confounding.
A
Americans are saying, hang on a minute, how come the Brits have started arresting people and we haven't? Do you think there is more of an appetite for it in other countries? I've got the list of and you again in the documentary sort of talk about the people who have faced consequences around the world, who've lost jobs, lost titles, all sorts of things. Is it the Prime Minister of Norway or somebody, I should say the former Prime Minister of Norway, Thorben Jaglund.
B
Yes. And the Crown Princess of Norway. No, I think you're right. There is absolutely wide held acceptance that the consequences seem to be followed through outside of the United States. So, yes, you know, certainly in the United Kingdom, with the biggest scalp of all in terms of the arrest of the former Prince Andrew. I mean, they're all very quick to say, just because you are friends doesn't mean you were involved in illegal activity. And of course that is true, but that doesn't mean that the investigation should stop here. You know, we're still interested in pursuing it. There seems to be a lot of stories still to be told, there's still a lot of files to be released and there's still a lot of consequences to be seen.
A
If you need support after listening to this podcast, you can call Lifeline on 131114 or contact 1-800-Respect on 1-800-737-732 or 1-800-Respect. Org AU. Indigenous Australians can contact 313 YARN on 139276 or 13 yarn.org AU.
B
The producers of this podcast recognise the traditional owners of the land on which it's recorded. They pay respect to the Aboriginal elders past, present and those emerging.
Release Date: April 29, 2026
Host: Meshel Laurie
Guest: Tara Brown, Senior Reporter for 60 Minutes Australia
Episode Theme:
A deep dive with investigative journalist Tara Brown into the “Epstein Files”—the trove of documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network—examining his rise, the survivors’ stories, the lingering mysteries, and the international ripple effects of his crimes and death.
This episode centers on the revelations and complexities presented in the “Epstein Files,” with insights from Tara Brown, whose documentary "Inside the Epstein Files" aimed to cut through conspiracy and focus on verified facts. The conversation explores Epstein’s background, his network's reach, the role of Ghislaine Maxwell, blackmail and extortion theories, financial mysteries, international responses, and frustrations over ongoing redactions and unanswered questions.
Tara notes the scope: "I don't want to make it sound like it's an explainer, but in a way that's what it evolved into. We certainly couldn't cover everything that had been dumped in the Epstein files." (00:57)
Many allegations are outlandish, and sorting fact from conspiracy is essential:
“There are lots of extraordinarily outlandish allegations and tips, and that’s part of the issue... But the truth itself is terrible.” —Tara Brown (01:21)
Meshel Laurie relays disturbing queries from the public, showing how perceptions have shifted from disbelief to tragic possibility:
“There is a feeling of things that we thought couldn’t be true have turned out to be true.” —Host (01:08)
Tara Brown discusses current allegations being investigated at Epstein’s New Mexico ranch:
“…sadly, as your daughter's identified, that is perhaps not far from the truth.” (01:21)
| Timestamp | Topic | |-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| | 00:57 | Tara on the challenges of covering the Epstein Files | | 01:21 | Sorting fact from conspiracy, current allegations in New Mexico | | 02:30 | Discussion of Epstein's offending pre-Ghislaine Maxwell | | 03:26 | Significance of the Virginia Giuffre-Prince Andrew-Ghislaine photo | | 04:49 | Epstein’s background and how he built power and connections | | 06:21 | Theories around blackmail/extortion and Wexner relationship | | 09:01 | Congressman Thomas Massie’s efforts for full transparency | | 10:03 | Frustrations regarding redaction of names in the released files | | 11:33 | International consequences—comparison of US and global responses |
The discussion remains direct, empathetic to victims and survivors, and resolutely focused on fact over sensationalism—mirroring Tara Brown’s investigative style. While recognizing the impossibility of answering every question in the wake of the file's partial release, both host and guest urge for continued transparency, accountability, and vigilance against letting powerful names slip through the net.
Content Warning & Support Resources:
This episode deals with themes of sexual abuse and exploitation. Support is offered for affected listeners at Lifeline, 1-800-Respect, and Indigenous-specific services.