Burden of Proof: The Defense’s Closing Argument

Summary

Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy

Episode: Burden of Proof: “The only crime scene is your private sex life”--The Defense’s Closing Argument

Release Date: June 27, 2025

---

Overview

In this pivotal episode of Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy, hosted by ABC News, the focus centers on the defense's closing arguments in the high-profile federal trial of Sean "Diddy" Combs. Facing serious allegations including sexual abuse, manipulation, and sex trafficking, Diddy's defense team sought to reshape the narrative and cast doubt on the prosecution's case as the trial transitions to jury deliberation.

---

Defense's Closing Argument

The defense, led by attorney Mark Agnifolo, delivered a theatrical and strategic closing argument aimed at humanizing Diddy and reframing the nature of his relationship with his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura.

• Reframing the Allegations: Agnifolo contended that the case was not about sex trafficking, racketeering, or prostitution but centered on "domestic violence," a charge not formally brought against Diddy. At [01:06], Eva Pilgrim highlights Agnifolo's plea to jurors: "Domestic violence is the issue. We own it. That's not charged."

• Portraying the Relationship as Consensual: The defense depicted the relationship between Diddy and Ventura as a consensual and modern love story. Agnifolo urged jurors to view their interactions through the lens of mutual agency, emphasizing the positive aspects of their relationship. As stated at [02:45], Agnifolo described their relationship as "a great modern love story," attempting to downplay accusations of abuse.

• Evidence Interpretation: Agnifolo addressed critical pieces of evidence, such as a video allegedly showing Diddy assaulting Ventura. He offered alternative explanations, suggesting that the incident was a result of jealousy over a cell phone rather than an act of violence intended to coerce Ventura into a "freak off" or sex party.

---

Key Strategies and Notable Quotes

• Reframing the Narrative: At [06:21], Agnifolo systematically dismantled the prosecution's claims by addressing each charge individually, asserting, "He didn't kidnap anyone, he didn't obstruct justice, he didn't bribe anyone."

• Emphasizing Lack of Criminal Enterprise: Agnifolo questioned the characterization of Diddy's social circles as a "racketeering conspiracy." At [12:30], he posed to jurors, "What's the one word that doesn't come up [regarding the photo of Diddy and others] is racketeering conspiracy."

---

Expert Analysis of the Defense's Performance

Brian Buckmire, ABC News legal contributor, and Bernardo Villona provided insights into the effectiveness of Agnifolo's arguments.

• Brian Buckmire's Perspective:

  • Engagement vs. Content: Buckmire noted that while Agnifolo's stylistic approach might not have been universally appreciated, his ability to connect certain points resonated with jurors. He remarked, "He swung for the fences, missed a lot, but he made some connections in other parts." ([11:42])

• Bernardo Villona's Critique:

  • Credibility Issues: Villona criticized Agnifolo's attempt to frame the situation as a love story, stating, "What does love gotta do with it?" referencing a judicial rebuke. He further argued that Agnifolo's downplaying of violent allegations, such as suggesting that sexual encounters were consensual despite gruesome testimonies, undermined the defense's credibility. ([12:30])

---

Prosecution's Rebuttal

Following the defense's closing argument, the prosecution swiftly responded with a robust rebuttal led by Maureen Comey.

• Aggressive Counterarguments: Comey methodically refuted Agnifolo's claims, emphasizing the severity and reality of the accusations. She highlighted the dissonance between the defense's portrayal of events and the harrowing testimonies presented during the trial. Comey criticized the defense for making light of serious allegations, stating, "This is a complete mockery of the government's case." ([16:03] - [17:13])

• Focus on Core Allegations: She reiterated the gravity of the crimes Diddy is accused of, ensuring that the court remained focused on the facts rather than the defense's narrative.

---

Jury Deliberation Insights

The episode delves into the psychological and procedural aspects of jury deliberations with input from Eric Rudick, a senior litigation consultant.

• Impact of Celebrity Status: Rudick affirmed that Diddy's prominence added layers of complexity to the jury's decision-making process. He stated, "With all the media attention and their familiarity with Sean Combs, they're certainly even more attuned to the importance of their decision." ([07:21] - [07:48])

• Deliberation Process: He explained that jurors typically begin by sharing their immediate impressions and emotions before methodically addressing each charge based on the evidence. Rudick predicted that the initial hours of deliberation would be cathartic, allowing jurors to process the extensive emotional testimony presented during the trial.

• Evidence Evaluation: Emphasizing the importance of direct and corroborative evidence, Rudick noted, "Jurors do not like circumstantial evidence. They want to see direct proof... and they also want to see evidence that corroborates other witnesses' testimony." ([09:33] - [10:01])

---

Public and Media Reactions

The trial's high-profile nature has sparked intense public interest and varied media narratives.

• Social Media and Online Discussions: The episode touches on public fascination with related developments, such as new music collaborations involving Diddy's son and speculations about Cassie Ventura's potential music projects. [19:49]

• Courtroom Atmosphere: Host Eva Pilgrim describes the charged environment outside the courthouse, likening it to a carnival with supporters and detractors vocally expressing their opinions. This intense atmosphere underscores the societal divisions and emotional investment surrounding the case. ([22:10] - [22:27])

---

Conclusion and Upcoming Developments

As the jury prepares to deliberate, Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy promises continued real-time updates and expert analyses. The verdict is anticipated to have profound implications, not only for Diddy but also for the broader discourse on power dynamics and accountability in the entertainment industry.

---

This summary provides an in-depth look into the defense's closing arguments in the Sean "Diddy" Combs trial, capturing key strategies, expert analyses, and the surrounding public discourse, making it a comprehensive overview for listeners and those following the case closely.

Transcript

[Eva Pilgrim]

Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile.

[Brian Buckmire]

With the price of just about everything.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Going up, we thought we'd bring our prices down.

[Brian Buckmire]

So to help us, we brought in.

[Eva Pilgrim]

A reverse auctioneer, which is apparently a.

[Brian Buckmire]

Thing Mint Mobile Unlimited Premium wireless.

[Erin Katerski]

How many get 30, 30.

[Brian Buckmire]

Better get 30. Better get 20, 20, 20. Better get 20, 20.

[Mark Agnifolo]

Everybody get 15, 15, 15, 15.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Just 15 bucks a month.

[Brian Buckmire]

So give it a try. @mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment of $45 for a three month plan equivalent to $15 per month. Required new customer offer for first three months only.

[Mark Agnifolo]

Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of networks busy. Taxes and fees extra.

[Brian Buckmire]

See mintmobile.com hey, it's Brian. Court ended today with a theatrical closing argument from Sean Combs lead defense attorney Mark Agnifolo. And the government gave its rebuttal on Monday. The case heads to the jury. We're going to bring you full analysis today. I joined my colleagues from ABC News Live on Burden of the Case against Diddy. The show Streams weekdays at 5:30pm Eastern on ABC News Live. You can find it on Disney, Hulu or on most of your favorite streaming apps. We'll be back in your Bad Rap feed next week as we await the verdict.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Hi, I'm Eva Pilgrim. Thanks for streaming with us. It has all come down to this. The fate of Sean Combs is now in the hands of 12 jurors. Combs defense team presented their closing arguments today asking jurors to have the courage to acquit Sean Combs and to quote, return him to his family. The defense attorney telling jurors this trial isn't about sex trafficking, racketeering or transportation to engage in prostitution instead saying, quote, domestic violence is the issue. We own it. That's not charged. The defense also attempting to sway jurors into seeing Combs ex girlfriend Cassie Ventura as a willing participant in his swingers lifestyle, calling their relationship, quote, a great modern love story. Jury deliberations are set to begin Monday. The rath mogul has pleaded not guilty to all charges. If convicted, he could face up to life in prison. Let's get right to chief investigative court correspondent Erin Katerski, who has been inside the courtroom throughout this trial. And Aaron, the defense wrapped today. How long did their closing arguments take?

[Erin Katerski]

About four hours. Defense attorney Mark Agnifolo. In that time, Eva sought to convince the jury of the times. When Cassie Ventura had agency in her relationship with Sean Combs, she wasn't clutching her pearls. Agnifolo told the jury she chose the kind of lifestyle also that Sean Combs was into.

[Eva Pilgrim]

The defense asked the jury to see the case as a, quote, great modern love story. Can you please explain this moment to us?

[Erin Katerski]

It was a moment where the defense really tried to reframe everything the jury had heard about the relationship between Cassie Ventura and Sean Combs. He urged them to read all of the text messages they sent each other. He said it would make you cry, some of the most beautiful things he had ever seen. And he said it was true love. It was a great modern love story, perhaps whitewashing the fact that he beat her, as prosecutors later pointed out in rebuttal, throughout the years of their relationship.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Now, Combs has been in this courtroom for over a month now, ERA and his family and friends often attending there in support. Who was there with him today?

[Erin Katerski]

All of the kids. They just left. As a matter of fact, his mother was there. He gestured to them on the way in and he hugged his defense attorney, Mark Agnifolo, after he finished delivering the closing statement. This was the last chance that Combs will have to try and convince the jury to find him not guilty. And the defense asked jurors to summon the courage to acquit Sean Combs. Defense attorney Agnifolo said the government targeted him with evidence that could not support the charges.

[Eva Pilgrim]

So, Erin, what's next in this case?

[Erin Katerski]

The jury is done for the weekend. They're going to be back on Monday morning. They'll hear the judge's instructions on the law and then begin deliberating the charges that could put Sean Combs in prison for life if he's convicted, something the defense was desperately trying to avoid with their arguments today.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Aaron Katerski for us there at the courthouse looks very busy behind you. Thank you so much. And now ABC News legal contributor Brian Buckmire is joining me to discuss the impact of these closing arguments prior to deliberation. Brian, how did the defense close their arguments here?

[Brian Buckmire]

So it's very interesting. We started off with a quote from actually one of Cassie's posts on Instagram that's still on her Instagram page now and talked about domestic violence. Is the issue saying that this is about domestic violence, a theme that the defense has brought up from the beginning of this trial, and it was not about sex trafficking. Trying to reframe that. Sean Combs, just like Teddy Garrigo said in the opening statements, is a flawed man, an indefensible man. But the allegations in which he's being accused of are not things that he's done.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Can you tell us more about the attorney who presented Today's closing argument.

[Brian Buckmire]

Mark Igniflo is the lead attorney in this case. You might have seen him in the nxivm case as well. He's well known throughout the Southern District of New York and in federal court cases. He did the closing arguments here. And if Igniflo makes or sounds familiar to you, Karen McNiffelo, his wife representing Luigi Mangioni. But we'll kind of move on from that. He gave the arguments here and the trial.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Okay. So the federal prosecutors have argued that the video of Combs dragging Ventura is sort of the. It's the linchpin moment of this case. Right. The defense had a really different spin on this today.

[Brian Buckmire]

Interestingly enough, even if you look at Jane Rosenberg, she is the sketch artist here writing about this. Sean Combs has a cell phone in his hand. And what the defense is arguing here is that this is about getting a cell phone, whether it be Cassie or Sean Combs is back. And that when he had the opportunity to get the phone, he took it and left. Even reframing the idea that he didn't throw the vase at Cassie, instead throwing the contents of the vase, the flowers still a bad thing, and the vase fell on his feet. And it wasn't that he was trying to drag her back to a freak off. In fact, when Israel Flores came up, one of the security guards, he's saying that he can see Cassie saying, get back to the room, get back to the room. Agnifolo making the argument that there was no danger back in the room. There was no freak off in the room. This is about jealousy. This is about that phone.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Okay, what did the defense attorney want these jurors to take away from everything that they heard?

[Brian Buckmire]

So all of the predicate acts, right? He didn't kidnap anyone, he didn't obstruct justice, he didn't bribe anyone. Each and every time, giving a piece of evidence and giving his rendition, his version of why this wasn't a racketeering conspiracy, why these were not predicate acts. Ultimately walking through each and every charge and explaining about the lack of credibility of some of the witnesses, how they might have exaggerated or lied in the opinion of the defense, or that the elements of the crime were not made out. Because it just doesn't make sense that Sean Combs is not part of a criminal enterprise, but instead a self made billionaire.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Brian, thank you so much for being with us. With closing arguments wrapped, the jury, the case will now go to the jury on Monday. What will happen inside the closed doors of that deliberation? Room. Here to give us some insight into the process is Eric Rudick, a senior litigation consultant. And, Eric, you're not involved in this case, but you are an expert on jury behavior. Sean Combs isn't just any defendant. He's a major celebrity. So does that typically come into play with a jury?

[Eric Rudick]

Yes, absolutely. So regardless of the criminal case, the jury understands the gravity of their decision and that they ultimately are deciding the fate of an individual. But especially in this case, with all the media attention, all the people in the courtroom, and their familiarity with Sean Combs, they're certainly even more attuned to the importance of their decision. And they're going to weigh the evidence and I believe, you know, consider all the evidence and decide the case accordingly.

[Eva Pilgrim]

What do you expect those first minutes of deliberation will be like for a jury? For this jury?

[Eric Rudick]

So these are the only 12 people in the world that haven't been able to watch any news about the trial or even speak to each other. So. And after almost two months of very emotional testimony, they're going to want. It's going to be very cathartic. They want to talk about the case, talk about moments in the trial. So before they even start to consider the verdict questions, I feel, you know, based on my experience in talking to jurors after trials, they're going to spend the next first one or two hours just, you know, just getting everything off their chest before they start to really deliberate and decide each of the charges against Sean Combs.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Now, no cameras were allowed inside the courtroom during this trial, but the national media and even some high profile people were in that courtroom. Is that something that jurors would typically be impacted by in any way?

[Eric Rudick]

Certainly, regardless of the trial, but especially in a case like this, their familiarity with celebrities and, you know, they're liking them, and having those folks support Sean Combs can certainly impact them. But ultimately, they've heard two months of testimony, and I think all that's going to be gone, go into the background when they speak to each other, and ultimately look at the evidence that they heard in the two months, consider the, you know, what the prosecution and defense, how they wrapped up the case in terms of their closing arguments, and, you know, you really deliberate and decide the case. And I think all that will not be as important once they start to.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Deliberate the gravity of this for this jury. You mentioned that earlier, determining someone's fate. What kind of evidence typically does well with juries? What typically does not.

[Eric Rudick]

So jurors do not like circumstantial evidence. They want to see direct proof, especially if they're going toif the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt, which it is here in any criminal trial. So they want to see the physical evidence and they also want to see evidence that corroborates other witnesses testimony. So that's going to be very important how they weigh the decision. The videos, all the corroborating testimony is going to, I believe, going to be very important for their ultimate decisions in this case.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Eric, thank you so much for being with us. We really appreciate your insight.

[Eric Rudick]

Sure.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Still ahead, closing arguments in the Sean Diddy Combs trial. The defense trying to convince the jury their client is not a sex trafficker. Were they convincing? Our legal experts weigh in. That's next.

[Brian Buckmire]

She's made up her mind to live pretty smart, learn to budget responsibly right from the start. She spends a little less in boots, more rents her savings, keeps her blood pressure low and credit score raises. She's cutting debt right out of her life. She tracks her cash flow on her spreadsheet at night. Boring money moves.

[Eric Rudick]

Make kind of lame songs, but they.

[Brian Buckmire]

Sound pretty sweet to your wallet. BNC bank brilliantly boring since 1865.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Welcome back. The jury in the Sean Diddy Combs trial set to start deliberating Monday. Today, the defense delivered a closing argument that was at times theatrical. Let's break down the strengths and weaknesses of their closing. ABC News legal contributors Brian Buckmire and Bernardo Villona are here. Brian, the defense had some colorful statements today, including, I just want to read a few of them, boxes of Astroglide. Take him off the streets, referring to the lubricant that was found in Combs garage. And when talking about Cassie Ventura, he said this. She's a woman who actually likes sex. Good for her. She's beautiful. Brian.

[Brian Buckmire]

Not the way that I would have done it stylistically, I think not the best way to do it. But I think for Mark Agnippolo, the way he's coming across is someone that is explaining a case as if you were sitting in a bar. And I think for the important part of this is what do those 12 people think about it? I did not like it. I know many of us in the audience didn't like it, especially calling us a modern day love story. He beat that woman relentlessly. We saw it on a video. That's no love story that I've ever read or have known about. But it seemed like in the points that he was making in terms of why certain evidence didn't connect to the crimes, the Jurors were engaged. I think they liked his personality. It came off more authentic than what we saw from the government of just reading and telling the elements and walking bit by bit. So, yeah, he swung for the fences, missed a lot, but he made some connections in other parts.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Bernardo, I see you furrowing your brow over there.

[Bernardo Villona]

So from the prosecution standpoint, looking at the closing argument of Mark Agnifolo, I mean, he made a joke out of the whole court system. He made a joke out of the whole closing arguments. It was like a complete mockery of the government's case and of the closing. And I think that may backfire on him because literally for the first hour or so, it felt like I was sitting in a comedy show. And that's hard. You know, some cases you can make it, you know, a little bit of laughter, stuff like that. But when you have video of a woman getting beat, beaten, brutally beaten, and when you have text messages that actually corroborate in a sense of the feelings of what these women went through, and when, you know, when some of the testimony is that escort urinated in Cassie's mouth, pretty much waterboarding her and having to have sex with a UTI or on her period. So there is testimony that is just so gruesome, and for you to make a whole mockery of it, I think it may backfire him. Yes, he did the most that he could in terms of. Of arguing the predicate acts, why it's not predicate acts, and why there's no racketeering conspiracy. But he also lost credibility on another point, which is having to deal with the man act, transportation, to engage in prostitution, because for him to say that Sean Combs was paying for time, quality time, not for sex, I think he lost credibility with that argument. And that may have trickled down to the rest of what he was saying.

[Eva Pilgrim]

All right, strengths and weaknesses. Brian, you go first.

[Brian Buckmire]

I think the strength, the style of which Mark and Ivolo did, not necessarily the presentation, but the arguments that he makes. I think for him, what I saw is he took a central theme or idea that people might think be universal. 1. I think that might have worked out well. And I saw some of the jurors really respond well to it, is this allegation of Cassie being raped and the text messages as to whether it happened in September or in October. And his argument was that Cassie was with Sean Combs, her then ex, because she's with her now husband, and while having intercourse with him, the husband called and he's saying, well, guys, this is A story that we all understand that because she got caught, she has to make up a lie. And she made the biggest of lies that she was raped. That is a concept that I think people are like, okay, why would you lie? In that sense, I kind of get it. And I think that helped him. But on other aspects where he's talking about this being a modern day love story, or some of the points that Bernardo made up is like, dude, like, where are we going with that? Like, stick to your strengths.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Don't waver off Bernardo.

[Bernardo Villona]

I have to say, I have to take it back to one of the bail applications where Judge Justice Carter said, what does love gotta do with it? You know, that's what played in my head when he was talking about this modern day love story. But also in terms of another. Well, actually a strength of his, aside from doing the predicate acts, I think one, having to deal with the kidnapping where he told this jury, you come here in the morning and you're not allowed to leave until the end of the day. Do you feel like you're kidnapped? So that's number one. But two, when he blew up a picture of Sean Combs and KK is in it and a lot of other people, we're talking about over 20 other people that are inside of that photo. And he asked his jury, what's the one thing that comes to your mind when you see this photo? You know, is it joy? Is it happiness? Is it family? Is it business? And he said the one word that doesn't come up is racketeering conspiracy. The government wants you to think that this photo right here of Sean Combs, KK and like 20 other people gathered is racketeering conspiracy. And this is not it. So I thought those were two strengths in the defense closing.

[Eva Pilgrim]

The prosecution got to give a rebuttal.

[Brian Buckmire]

Yes.

[Eva Pilgrim]

What do you think?

[Bernardo Villona]

They did the prosecution's rebuttal. Maureen Comey came out swinging. She went head on. I mean, I think it was like a head on collision when she came out, literally, because she was so aggressive and so passionate. But she needed to be because she had to show her disgust for the mockery that Mark Agnifolo made of this entire closing argument and of the case in general. And she hit it point by point. Everything that Mark Agnifolo had said and also re emphasized to this jury in the sense of, did these women want to have sex on with a uti, with a cold sore being beaten? And re emphasized in terms of what is the conspiracy? Who are the people part of this conspiracy? And how it's a mockery and defies logic in the sense of you think that he was paying just to have them for quality time. It's in his own messages. When he was texting, Sean Combs was texting, the head of Cowboy for Angels was like, look, here's $1,000 for that bum ass cowboy. Like, because he couldn't perform, but yet he still paid $1,000.

[Brian Buckmire]

And to piggyback off of that, when Mark and Nivlo was doing his closing argument, AOC Comey was chomping at the bit. You could see her just waiting, rolling her eyes. And even behind that, you saw Sean Cone's leg puttering like this.

[Bernardo Villona]

Right. And when a defendant is acting like that, you know you're doing a good job as a prosecutor. But I also have to point out that Mark Agnifolo, because of certain statements that he made during his closing argument, the judge had to step in and give a curative instruction to the jury to be like, look, what was said pretty much is saying, look, what was said was wrong. You are ultimately the judges of the facts. You're not too determined about some this is a targeted prosecution or why specifically they were going after Sean Cobes.

[Eva Pilgrim]

All right, we're out of time. I know we could talk about this for a lot, a lot longer. Bernardo, Bryan, thank you both for being here with us. Coming up, YouTube star Tisa tells us here to dish about what people are talking about with this trial and Diddy's son teaming up with ye on a new song. What or who's it About? We'll tell you next.

[Mark Agnifolo]

Summer's here and Nordstrom has everything you need for your.

[Bernardo Villona]

Best dress season ever.

[Mark Agnifolo]

From beach day and weddings to weekend getaways.

[Bernardo Villona]

In your everyday wardrobe, discover stylish options under $100, from tons of your favorite brands like Mango skims, Princess Polly and Madewell. It's easy, too, with free shipping and.

[Mark Agnifolo]

Free returns in store order, pickup and more. Shop today in stores [e-mail] or download the Nordstrom app.

[Brian Buckmire]

This episode is brought to you by Polestar.

[Mark Agnifolo]

There's only one true way to experience.

[Brian Buckmire]

The all electric luxury SUV Polestar 3, and that's to take a test drive.

[Mark Agnifolo]

It can go from 0 to 60.

[Brian Buckmire]

In as little as 4.8 seconds with the dynamic handling of a sports car. But to truly understand how it commands the road, you need to be behind the wheel up to 350 miles of range. The 3D surround sound system by Bowers and Wilkins. It's all something you have to experience, to believe. So book your Test drive for Polestar 3 [e-mail].

[Eva Pilgrim]

Welcome back. Another busy day in court today as the jury prepares to deliberate in the Sean Diddy Combs trial. YouTube star Tisa tells is back with us. She's been at the courthouse every day since the trial started, giving her more than half a million subscribers the inside scoop on all the days happening. Tisa, thanks for being here. Big day. Yes. What have your followers been saying today?

[Mark Agnifolo]

Everybody's been going crazy. They're super proud of the way the prosecution pulled through. Mark Agnefield got up there, your honor, and he did his thing and he was really good until he went into kind of creepy, misogynistic territory is what a lot of people thought. But the prosecution on the rebuttal really pulled it through.

[Eva Pilgrim]

So Combs family has been in court kind of on and off again today. Like, pretty much everyone was there. What was the vibe like in court?

[Mark Agnifolo]

The vibe was hopeful. Again, they were looking at Mark Agnifilio when he started. He came out with a bang. He is a showman. As much as I tease him, we know why. Diddy spent millions on him. And when he came, they were looking at him like he was the archangel Michael coming out with his sword of vengeance swinging. And they were just feeling like, yes, yes, yes. And when they saw the jury nodding along, smiling, laughing of Mark Agafilio, I think they finally saw their version of justice getting served.

[Eva Pilgrim]

The jury will start deliberating on Monday. None of us know kind of how this will go or how long it will take. What is your plan as you wait?

[Mark Agnifolo]

My plan is to be there every moment of the day. You know, the juries. I've heard a lot from the OGs at ABC because you guys have done so much. The ABC people in the courtroom said that, you know, jury notes get passed to the judge when the jury has questions, and you never really know when the jury's gonna come out. So I'm gonna be camped in there giving updates live, but really just hanging on because I, I don't know, like anyone else. How made up are the minds of the jury? Do they have an idea or is this going to be 12 angry men in the room? So I'm really excited to actually see how this plays out.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Yeah. And they have the weekend, all of them, to think about it. Yeah. What do you think it's going to be like when this verdict comes in?

[Mark Agnifolo]

I think it's going to be pandemonium. You know, again, if anybody's ever watched my YouTube channel, you know, you know where my mind stands. But there's a lot of people that really, really support Diddy and both sides are super, super passionate. So I think it's going to be pand just because outside in the court every day, there's pandemonium. So I'm sure when the verdict's read, it's going to be just like the first day. A full house, everybody around and everybody feeling passionately.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Give us that color. Because a lot of people haven't been down to the federal courthouse. They don't know what the scene looks like there. Explain to us what that pandemonium currently already is.

[Mark Agnifolo]

Honestly, outside, it's kind of like a carnival. People are screaming at each corner, free Diddy. He's innocent. You're destroying a man's legacy. Other people are screaming, no, he's guilty. Guilty. People have gotten into fights over just random strangers. When you're waiting out front in the line, even with the pandemonium, with the line sitters in a circus with that, people are just getting really amped up, heightened emotions. And for some reason, good or bad, people see themselves in Diddy. People see themselves, of course, in the victims and survivors. And it literally is just boiling over more and more and more. It's turning into pure chaos out there. So when the verdict is read, I am sure they are going to secure the front of the courthouse as best they can. But again, everything's already starting to boil up with closing arguments. So it's going to be interesting.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Tisa, thank you so much for being here with us. Always so good to have you. Time now to take a look at some of the day's top online searches surrounding this case. People clearly have questions, and we have ABC News contributor Kelly Carter joining us now from la. She always has the answers for us. So, Kelly, let's start here. People are searching new music from Diddy sun and rapper Ye. What's going on here?

[G]

Yeah, you know. So as we know, and we knew this a while ago, that Kanye west, formerly known as Kanye west, and King Combs, Sean Combs son, were working on new music together. And at midnight, they dropped a seven single ep. And one song, of course, is dedicated to his father. And he talks about how no one is gonna get any sleep until his dad is free. And that's something that people are searching for and trying to find context clues, but also see what they're talking about in that song.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Another question people are asking, is Cassie Ventura still making music?

[G]

Now, here's what's interesting. You know, it's been almost 20 years since her first and only album came out from that 11 album deal. That was in 2006. And at the end of last year, it was been, it was reported that she was actually hoping to release music that she had recorded all these years but that never saw the light of day and that she's just kind of, you know, tweaking them a little bit and is looking for a deal and probably, you know, maybe might release some new music. I think if ever there's a time to release some new music from her, now is probably that time.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Yeah, it's a wait and see, but maybe we'll actually see new music from her. People are also looking up Diddy kids.

[G]

Yeah, I wonder if that's a reference to this new, you know, King Combs album. But of course, all of the children, with the exception of one, showed up in court for these, you know, kind of closing statements from both sides. So we have seen, you know, so infrequent appearances from all of the children, but all of them, with the exception of the baby, were there in court today listening to these closing statements and these final statements.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Kelly Carter, thank you so much for being with us.

[G]

Thanks for having me.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Thank you for joining us. We'll be back when the jury has a verdict. For even more on the Diddy trial, make sure to follow our podcast, Bad Rap, the case against Diddy, hosted by our very own Brian Buckmire. Wherever you listen to podcasts, podcasts, I'm Eva Pilgrim in New York. Have a good weekend.

[Brian Buckmire]

Paradise is back. It's finally here in a new location, Costa Rica. There will be adventure, drama and romance. All gas, no breaks. That's my vibe. Ready to find some love. But it wouldn't be paradise without surprises along the way. These kids need to learn. That's right. Your favorite golden alums are crashing the beach.

[Bernardo Villona]

We bring in a party baby.

[Erin Katerski]

Bachelor in paradise premieres Monday, July 7th at 8.7Central on ABC and stream on Hulu.

[Brian Buckmire]

From Marvel Television, I'm executive producer Ryan Coogler.

[Bernardo Villona]

Y' all calling me crazy.

[Mark Agnifolo]

I want to build something iconic experience.

[Brian Buckmire]

The sixth episode of the that that.

[Bernardo Villona]

Eyesuit is the ultimate display of power.

[Brian Buckmire]

I'm going to take it.

[Eva Pilgrim]

Absolutely not.

[Brian Buckmire]

Now streaming on Disney + RiRi this is serious.

[Mark Agnifolo]

This power does not come without risk.

[Eric Rudick]

Might be a hero in there after all.

[Brian Buckmire]

Marvel Televisions Ironheart now streaming only on Disney plus.