The Trial: New Week, New Juror

Summary

Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy
Episode: The Trial: New Week, New Juror
Release Date: June 17, 2025

---

Introduction

In this episode of Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy, hosted by ABC News legal contributor and attorney Brian Buckmire, listeners are brought deep into the intricacies of the ongoing trial against Sean "Diddy" Combs. As the trial enters its sixth week, significant developments unfold, shedding light on both the prosecution's mounting evidence and the defense's strategic maneuvers.

Progress in the Trial

Juror Removal and Jury Composition

The episode opens with a critical update regarding the jury selection process. The judge confirmed the dismissal of Juror Number Six following concerns about his eligibility to serve on a federal jury in Manhattan.

Brian Buckmire [00:40]: "The judge said Monday morning there's nothing the juror could say at this point to put the genie back in the bottle."

The dismissed juror, who is Black, was replaced by a White alternate, altering the jury’s demographic to be older, more educated, and predominantly white and suburban. This shift raises questions about the jury's dynamics and impartiality, though the judge dismissed concerns about racial motivations behind the juror’s removal.

Prosecution's Case: Presenting Evidence

As the prosecution approaches the conclusion of their case, they have been presenting a series of text and audio messages to build a narrative of Diddy's alleged involvement in orchestrating "freak offs"—sex parties that were purportedly controlled and videotaped by him. These communications suggest financial transactions and coordination among Diddy’s associates:

• Transaction with a Drug Dealer: Messages about paying a drug dealer named Guido for Molly pills.
• Preparation for Events: Instructions to set up a hotel room for a freak off, including procuring baby oil.
• Internal Communications: Exchanges indicating attempts to downplay violent incidents and maintain focus on the case.

Brian Buckmire [02:30]: “The jury saw messages about paying a drug dealer named Guido for Molly pills...”

The prosecution plans to rest their case between Wednesday and Friday, aiming to consolidate their evidence with summary witnesses who can help synthesize the presented information for the jury.

Defense's Strategy

The defense has been actively challenging the prosecution's evidence, highlighting messages that seem to minimize the role of Diddy’s assistants in illicit activities. They argue that charges such as drug distribution and sex trafficking may be exaggerated or misrepresented.

Brian Buckmire [02:50]: “The defense highlighted messages that seemed to downplay the alleged role of Combs employees in buying drugs...”

Looking ahead, the defense is expected to present their witnesses starting Friday, including Vashta Dunlap, a former vice president at Bad Boy Entertainment, to counter the prosecution's claims and provide alternative interpretations of the evidence.

Insights from the Q&A Segment

Following the trial updates, Brian Buckmire engages with listeners through a series of compelling questions, offering deeper legal insights into the case.

Witnesses Propping Up Diddy’s Defense

Caller Tyisha from Durham, North Carolina, inquires about the possibility of witnesses supporting Diddy’s character:

Tyisha [03:55]: "What about the fact that like, does Diddy have any witnesses against Cassie or I'm hearing Cassie, Cassie, Cassie, what about Diddy?"

Brian Buckmire [04:18]: "In a criminal case, it's the prosecution who are bringing the charges and they go first... it's more about attacking the elements or the charges that he's facing."

Buckmire explains that while the defense may eventually present witnesses to mitigate potential sentencing, the current phase focuses on rebutting the prosecution's accusations rather than endorsing Diddy’s character.

Potential Legal Risks for Alleged Victims

Caller Eileen from Texas raises concerns about Cassie Ventura's potential liability:

Eileen [05:40]: "If her argument or her case is not compelling enough with her testimony, is it possible that she could have a case against her as well for sex trafficking if they find Diddy guilty?"

Brian Buckmire [06:17]: "It is highly unlikely that the government will then turn around and prosecute her as well... They don't want to start that precedent."

Buckmire reassures that, legally, Cassie would unlikely face prosecution as the focus remains on the defendant, ensuring that victims are not deterred from coming forward.

Impact of Interstate Activities on Charges

Caller Tony from West Virginia questions the significance of crossing state lines in the charges:

Tony [07:27]: "Does that mean if he hired local in state sex workers, wherever he had gone, this may not have even ever been a case?"

Brian Buckmire [07:55]: "If you only hired sex workers within the state, he could still potentially have problems with RICO... It might only affect one or two charges, not necessarily all of them."

Buckmire clarifies that federal charges often hinge on activities crossing state lines, making the scope of the alleged crimes broader and more severe.

Duration of RICO Cases Compared to Other High-Profile Trials

Caller Dave from New York City compares this trial's length to other RICO cases:

Dave [08:52]: "How long does a normal RICO case generally last?"

Brian Buckmire [09:14]: "With Sean Combs, you have one defendant with a RICO charge and eight predicate acts... this is on the shorter side of a RICO case."

Buckmire notes that RICO cases vary widely in duration based on the number of defendants and the complexity of predicate acts, positioning Diddy's trial as relatively concise.

Consequences for Diddy’s Businesses and Employees

Caller Kelly from Dallas, Texas asks about the impact of a potential conviction on Diddy’s business ventures:

Kelly [13:42]: "If he is found guilty, what happens to his companies and the employees there?"

Brian Buckmire [13:52]: "If Sean Combs is convicted, any assets connected to the crimes could be forfeited. Additionally, civil liabilities could affect his companies and employees if they are directly involved."

Buckmire explains that conviction could lead to significant financial repercussions for Diddy’s enterprises, though corporations themselves are unlikely to face criminal liability.

Jury Sequestration and Media Influence

Callers Catherine, Roslyn, and Alicia inquire about the jury's exposure to media and possible sequestration:

Alicia [15:53]: "Are the jury members in the Diddy trial being sequestered or are they able to receive outside media and to talk to each other?"

Brian Buckmire [16:42]: "They're not being sequestered... it's kind of the honor code where you say don't listen, don't look for it. If you hear anything, they're supposed to relay that to any jury staff."

Buckmire indicates that the jury is not sequestered but is expected to adhere to strict guidelines to prevent external influences, relying on the honor system to maintain impartiality.

Television Coverage of the Trial

Caller Delena from Missouri questions why the Diddy trial isn't being televised:

Delena [18:23]: "Why isn't Diddy's trial being televised like other high-profile cases?"

Brian Buckmire [18:48]: "Federal courts do not allow cameras... States like California allow cameras, but the federal system adheres to different interpretations of a public trial."

Buckmire highlights the distinction between federal and state court policies regarding media presence, explaining that Diddy’s trial follows federal restrictions on televised proceedings.

Celebrity Involvement in the Testimony

Caller Diane from Manchester, New Hampshire wonders about celebrity witnesses:

Diane [20:11]: "Are any celebrities going to be taking the stand?"

Brian Buckmire [20:29]: "As of now, no celebrities have been scheduled to take the stand. While names like Michael B. Jordan and Mike Myers were mentioned during jury selection, there's no indication they will testify."

Buckmire affirms that, despite high-profile names being associated with the case, no celebrities are slated to provide testimony, maintaining the focus on the core legal proceedings.

Conclusion and Next Steps

As the prosecution nears the end of its case, the episode wraps up with anticipation of the defense's forthcoming witness testimonies. Brian Buckmire emphasizes the gravity of the evidence presented and the strategic responses from both sides. Listeners are encouraged to stay tuned for real-time updates and in-depth analysis as the trial progresses toward its conclusion.

Brian Buckmire [22:00]: "We'll be back later in the week as the prosecution wraps up its case and we start to see what the defense has in store."

---

About the Host:
Brian Buckmire is an ABC News legal contributor and a practicing attorney, bringing expert legal analysis and insights into high-profile cases. In Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy, he meticulously dissects the complexities of the trial, providing listeners with a comprehensive understanding of the legal battles shaping the entertainment industry.

---

For more episodes and in-depth coverage of the Diddy trial, subscribe to Bad Rap: The Case Against Diddy on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your preferred podcast platform.

Transcript

[Narrator]

Newport Beach, California sits just south of Los Angeles. It's 2012 and the owner of a marijuana dispensary has been kidnapped, tortured and left for dead in the Mojave Desert. It began a decade long game of cat and mouse between investigators and a perpetrator, a mastermind of escape. He's a psychopath. Oh my God, they let Hannibal Lecter out. Devil in the Desert is out now.

[Brian Buckmire]

This is bad Rap. The Case Against Diddy. I'm Brian Buckmire, an ABC News legal contributor and practicing attorney. This episode New Week New Juror Week six of testimony in USA v. Sean Combs or open with the judge confirming he will definitely dismiss juror number six. Last week the prosecution asked to have the juror removed after he allegedly made statements to a court officer suggesting he lived in New Jersey, not the Bronx that would make him ineligible to serve on a federal jury in Manhattan. The defense argued the juror should stay and said the government's request was racially motivated. The removed juror is black. The alternate who replaced him is white. But the judge said the juror's lack of candor raised questions about whether the man was deliberately deceiving the court to get on the jury and whether his other answers during jury selection were also untrue. The judge said Monday morning there's nothing the juror could say at this point to put the genie back in the bottle. He also said he took the defense's note about race seriously, but added, this jury does not raise those concerns. The new juror has been watching testimony as an alternate from the beginning of the trial. He's a 57 year old architect from a New York City suburb and active in the Boy Scouts. With him, the jury now skews slightly older, more educated, whiter and more suburban. The government has indicated that it will rest its case as soon as Wednesday, as late as Friday, meaning the prosecution is now in wrap up mode. They're putting so called summary witnesses on the stand who can help review evidence and pull it all together for the jury. The court heard a smattering of text and audio messages presented by the prosecution meant to illustrate the alleged cooperation between Combs assistants and associates. The jury saw messages about paying a drug dealer named Guido for Molly pills. There was also a text from one of Combs assistants saying gotta re up on baby oil after receiving instructions to set up a hotel room for a freak off. And the jury also heard a 2018 exchange where Cassi Ventura told Combs one time Chief of staff Christina Coram, I can't do the violence coram messaged back stay focused, not worth derailing. The defense highlighted messages that seemed to downplay the alleged role of Combs employees in buying drugs, including in one message, Christina Corum said that she does not talk to Guido, that Combs talks to the drug dealer himself. Up next in the Diddy trial. Court will be closed on Thursday for Juneteenth and then the defense could pick up their witnesses as soon as Friday. They say they have three witnesses ready to go that first day, including Vashta Dunlap, who was a vice president at Bad Boy Entertainment. Now let's get to one of my favorite parts of this podcast, answering your questions. We've gotten such a great response from all of you out there that we've decided to make this a weekly segment. We're going to do it every Tuesday. So keep those questions coming. And now our first caller.

[Narrator]

Hi, my name is Tyisha and I'm in Durham, North Carolina. I had a question. What about the fact that like, does Diddy have any witnesses against Cassie or I'm hearing Cassie, Cassie, Cassie, what about Diddy? When is somebody going to take the stand for Diddy and say something good about him? So I just wanted to know the answer to that question. Okay, bye.

[Brian Buckmire]

All right, Tyisha, so whenever it comes to a case, whether it be civil or criminal, what we say is the moving party or the person bringing the allegations, they always go first. So, so in a criminal case, it's the prosecution who is bringing the charges. So they go first, they put on their witnesses, the defense has an opportunity to cross examine them. And then once the government or the prosecutor is done bringing on their witnesses, they will rest. You might hear that terminology in court. And then the defense has their opportunity to bring on their own witnesses. Now at that initial stage, we call that like the guilt phase of the case. And so it's, it's maybe not so much people coming in saying good things about Sean Combs. It's more about attacking the elements or the charges that he's facing. If, and I say if, cuz we, we don't know as yet. But if Sean Combs is found guilty, then he would have potentially different witnesses take the stand and they would say good things about him for what's called the sentencing part of the case. And that's when we know that Sean Combs is guilty. Again, I'm assuming that he is found guilty in this hypothetical. We know that he's found guilty and you have people giving what's called mitigation to try to lessen the jail time that he could be facing. And so that's when they'll be saying good things about him. But initially there'll be people talking about the elements and charges of the case to try to raise reasonable doubt on behalf of Sean Combs. But thanks for the question.

[Narrator]

Hey, Brian, this is Eileen calling from Texas. So I'm curious. I totally agree with Cassie that she is 100% the victim. But from a legal standpoint, if her argument or her case is not compelling enough with her testimony, is it possible that she could have a case against her as well for sex trafficking if they find Diddy guilty? Because it seems like she was with him through all that as well and she's the common denominator. It seems like they had these freak offs with each other and then, you know, rotating these sex workers. So just curious your thoughts on that.

[Brian Buckmire]

Thanks so much, Eileen. I understand where you're going with this thought process, but I would assume, and this is an assumption, because Cassie testified as an alleged victim in this case, it is highly unlikely that the government will then turn around and prosecute her as well. They would say that she did not have the intent or the mens rea or the capability of trafficking others, even though by her own statements she reached out to entertainers or sex workers, she coordinated some of these events. The idea both from a factual and legal standpoint would be that she was under the control or coercion of another and that she did not do it of her own volition. So if Sean Combs is found guilty or if even Sean Combs is acquitted of these charges, I would say it's highly unlikely that the government would prosecute Cassie just out of the nature of the allegations, but also as a public policy standpoint of they don't want alleged victims to come forward, testify against their abusers, and then be fearful of that depending on the outcome one way or another, they too can be prosecuted. They don't want to start that precedent. So I don't see that happening. But I see where you're going with that. Let's take a listen to the next question.

[Narrator]

Hi, this is Tony from West Virginia. You said that having the sex workers travel across state lines and travel with them being a major part of this. So does that mean if he hired local in state sex workers, wherever he had gone, this may not have even ever been a case? Thanks. Great podcast.

[Brian Buckmire]

So, Tony, that theory is correct, but it would be correct more so to the two lesser charges of transportation to engage in prostitution. Oftentimes when it comes to a federal case, and I'm speaking very specific to federal, it involves the crossing of state lines, is probably the easier way to say it, or the legal jargon kind of clunky way of saying it is affecting interstate commerce. That's often when it becomes a federal case. And so if he only hired sex workers within the state, he'd probably run afoul of state charges. And that might not rise to the level of a federal charge like transportation to engage in prostitution. But if you only hired people within in the state, he could still potentially have problems with rico, for example, or even sex trafficking with the alleged victims of Jane as well as Cassie. So it might only affect one or two charges, not necessarily all of them. All right, on to the next question.

[Narrator]

Hey, this is Dave in New York City. So this trial's been going on for kind of a while now. How long does a normal RICO case generally last? Obviously, we know the YSL trial lasted forever, but that thing seemed to be a singular mess compared to maybe mob trials or whatever other ricohs you know about. Is this longer, shorter? What do you think?

[Brian Buckmire]

Thanks, Dave. What a timely question because that YSL RICO case just ended last week. That case involved rapper young thug and 27 associates. Prosecutors alleged the record label YSL functioned as a criminal street gang. The last of the 28 defendants took a plea to time served on June 9th of 2025. Don't forget that that trial started November 27th of 2023. Now, I think in Georgia, actually, I know that is the longest case in Georgia history, and that's unique. But there's so many factors that go into RICO cases that make them long, make them short. I mean, compare the YSL case to Sean Combs case. With Sean Combs, you have one defendant with a RICO charge and eight predicate acts. Again, those are kidnapping, arson, bribery, witness tampering, forced labor, sex trafficking, transportation for the purposes of prostitution and drug distribution. Eight weeks kind of makes sense, especially considering the number of witnesses taking the stand and the type of defense that we have here. While with the YSL case, you have 28 defendants and far more predicate acts that I can calculate based on each and every one of those defendants putting them all together. And so really, to answer your question, it's hard to say what is a normal length of a RICO case, because I've had RICO cases myself where I have 10 defendants. They can have two defendants, they can have 20 defendants. You can have five predicate acts, you can have 120 predicate acts. It really depends on the number of defendants and the number of predicate acts as to how long or how short one of these RICO cases could be because Sean Combs is the only one on the indictment and there's only eight predicate acts. I would say this is on the shorter side of a RICO case, but that's only again, because of the number of defendants and the number of predicate acts. You kind of have to calculate based on those two factors. But good call on the question and thanks for calling in. Let's take a quick break and when we come back, your questions on sequestering the jury and why cameras aren't allowed in the courtroom.

[Narrator]

Hi, Zoe Saldana. Welcome to T Mobile. Here's your new iPhone 16 Pro on us. Thanks. And here's my old phone to trade in. You don't need to trade in. When you switch to T Mobile, we'll give you a new iPhone 16 Pro plus we'll help you pay off your old Phone up to 800 bucks and you still get to keep it. There's always a trade in. Not right now. @ T Mobile. I feel like I have to give you something in return for karma. That's okay. I don't really have much in my purse. Oh, let's see.

[Brian Buckmire]

Hand sanitizer.

[Narrator]

It's lavender. I'm good. Seriously.

[Brian Buckmire]

Let me check this pocket.

[Narrator]

Oh, mints. Really, I'm fine.

[Brian Buckmire]

Oh, I have raisins.

[Narrator]

I'm a mom. Wait, wait one sec. I've got cupcakes in the car.

[Brian Buckmire]

It's our best iPhone offer ever. Switch to T Mobile. Get a new iPhone Six 16 Pro with Apple Intelligence on us. No trade in needed. We'll even pay off your phone up to 800 bucks with 24 monthly bill credits. New line 100 plus a month on experience beyond Finance Agreement 999.99 and qualifying ported for well qualified plus tax and.

[Narrator]

Ten dollar connection charge. Payout via virtual prepaid.

[Brian Buckmire]

Total of 15 days credits and imbalance due if you pay off early or cancel CT mobile.com the stakes do not get any higher. I pledge allegiance to what I believe.

[Narrator]

In they have to fight another day.

[Brian Buckmire]

Of yesterday Beat me I ain't getting.

[Narrator]

Younger but I'm getting better Got no.

[Brian Buckmire]

Time to waste that's another man's treasure they say every dog has his day. These are the days the two very best in the NBA. Pacers Thunder the NBA final presented by YouTube TV continue on ABC. Hey there, it's Ryan Reynolds. And if you're into weird animals and.

[Narrator]

Questionable life choices, well, you're in for a treat. You tell them Green Day.

[Brian Buckmire]

I've teamed up with Nat Geo to fast forward right past nature's lore hogs.

[Narrator]

And get down in the mud.

[Brian Buckmire]

These guys are the grossest, most unlikely.

[Narrator]

Stars in the great movie of life.

[Brian Buckmire]

Underdogs from National Geographic. All episodes now streaming on Disney plus and Hulu.

[Narrator]

Hi, this is Kelly from Dallas, Texas. My question is, if he is found guilty, what happens to his companies and the employees there? Thank you.

[Brian Buckmire]

So when I think about if Sean Combs is found guilty, what happens to his companies and employees, I think of two things. I think of forfeiture, which is a part of this indictment. If there are any ways to connect the money that was received, the property that was gained, or the property that was used. Like Sean Combs is Miami home that allegedly had a number of items associated with the RICO conspiracy as well as some of the sex trafficking allegations. Sean Combs home in Miami, in my mind, that's gone if he's convicted. Any money that might be associated with any bank accounts or any corporations that can be tied to his crimes, also gone if convicted. The other thing I think about is criminal liability in terms of his companies and or his employees. Now, we know there are a number of civil lawsuits going around. A recent one just came out last week. His companies and employees have been named in a number of civil lawsuits and they could be civilly liable if there is any direct connection to what these alleged victims say happened to them. Now, we should say here that Diddy denies all allegations in those civil lawsuits. And his former chief of staff, Christina Corum, also released a statement saying she was confident that the allegations against her will be proven untrue. Criminal liability. A corporation is unlikely and actually cannot be criminally liable for these actions. But if any of his employees are named in any kind of criminal indictments in the future, we know that Sean Combs is merely just facing one criminal case against him. We have no idea if there will be other criminal cases, but if the facts lead in that direction in the Southern District of New York or other federal courthouses feel it necessary to pursue those charges. Yes, if you committed a crime that the government can pursue, then there's that possibility. But at this point, we haven't heard anything that would lead me to think that employees could face criminal liability outside of Sean Combs. Thanks for calling in. A lot of you called in with questions about the jury.

[Narrator]

Hey, Brian, my name's Dustin from Dallas, Texas. My name is Catherine and I am from Louisiana. This is Roslyn calling from the Chicago area. This is Alicia calling from Dresden, Ohio. My question is, are the jury members in the Diddy trial being sequestered or are they able to receive outside media and to talk to each other? I feel like this case is such a big popular case that they would want to sequester the jury. So I was just wondering why they would or wouldn't do that. What are the ways that the court can ensure that the jury is not compromised in any way? Obviously, there's this podcast, there's other podcasts, there's things on the news. Are they allowed to listen to these items while they're on break? Thanks.

[Brian Buckmire]

Wait, there are other Diddy podcasts? Well, let's put it this way, they're not being sequestered. Could it be asked as to whether or not they're sequestered during deliberations? That's for another episode when we get more information down the line. But what I think here is that the judge is very conscious of the fact that this is an eight week long trial. There's a reason why the judge said for most days, unless they really have a lot of work to be done, that the case will end each day at 3pm so they can go live their lives. The judge doesn't want a frustrated and exhausted jury. Now, when it comes to the questions of how do they make sure they don't listen to other media outlets or TV or whatever that may be, it's kind of the honor code. You tell the jury that they're not supposed to look out for information. Of course, if they're walking through a coffee shop or what it may be, the news may be on and something may pop up, they're supposed to kind of just turn away and walk away so they don't hear it. If they do hear anything, they're supposed to, again, on the honor code, relay that to any jury staff that's in the court. They bring that up to the judge and the judge will relay that to both the government and the defense and they'll talk about what was heard. Is this going to affect their mindset of the case? How much did they hear? How bad is it? They'll make that evaluation. But at this point, again, I go back to, it's just kind of the honor code where you say don't listen, don't look for it. If you hear the conversation, if you hear it on tv, walk away and let us know if you hear anything. And so that's pretty much how it's operating because it's such a long case and the judge doesn't want to sequester people for literally two months. All right, next question.

[Narrator]

Hi, my name is Delena from Missouri. I just had a question regarding how this trial is not televised. I noticed in the past big trials like OJ Simpson, the Menendez brothers, and even trials as big as Johnny Depp and Amber Heard were all televised and broadcasted. However, Diddy's is not being televised. Is there a reason why? Thank you.

[Brian Buckmire]

It is the Supreme Court of the United States that makes rules for all federal courts. And I think you'd have to raise this issue with Chief Justice Roberts as to why there are no cameras, not only in the Supreme Court in the United States, but all federal courts. The cases you listed, O.J. simpson, Menendez brothers, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard, those are all state cases. And those states allow for cameras to be in the courts to televise those cases. It's their interpretation of what a public trial is. And that's part of our constitutional right that everyone has some states and the federal government believes that a public trial is simply having enough people inside that courtroom or even the courthouse, where there may be what we call overflow rooms where people can sit in other courtrooms and watch a closed circuit video of what's going on inside the court. And if you came down to lower Manhattan, to the Southern District of New York, there are two overflow rooms that if you can't get into the main courtroom, you can watch from there. That's how they believe having a public courtroom works. But in states like California, where the O.J. simpson and Menendez brothers case were, or Johnny Depp and Amber Heard in Virginia, those states interpret a public trial much more broadly and allow for cameras to be in court so people all across the country, even the world, can watch what's going on. Okay, last call for today.

[Narrator]

Hi, this is Diane from Manchester, New Hampshire. My question is, is any celebrities going to be taking the stand, or are they going to be looked into knowing what was going on with Diddy behind the scenes?

[Brian Buckmire]

Diane, thanks for calling in. As of now, no celebrities have been scheduled to take the stand that we know of. We know that the government has already signaled as to who their last witnesses are. The defense has only signaled as to who they expect to testify on Friday. Now, while people like Michael B. Jordan and Mike Myers came up in jury selection, people were curious, are we going to hear about them? It turns out Michael B. Jordan was set up on a date with Cassie Ventura by a government witness. One of Diddy's assistants was previously an assistant to Mike Myers. There were no allegations in the case that Michael B. Jordan or Mike Myers had anything to do with what Sean Combs is being accused of, merely that their names came up as individuals in this case, and so it's very unlikely that they would testify in any capacity. Though he wasn't there to take the stand, we did have one really big celebrity appearance last week. Picture this. Friday afternoon, I step outside the courthouse to check in with my ABC colleagues. All of a sudden a black Mercedes pulls up and out comes Kanye west or ye in an all white outfit. I pulled out my phone and caught his arrival on tape, which you're hearing now. Kanye, who are you in support of? He was an arm's distance away from me. How could I not ask him questions? Later, as Kanye walked through the courthouse, an ABC colleague asked if he was there to support Sean Combs, to which Kanye nodded his head yes. That's it for this episode of Bad Rap, the Case Against Diddy. We'll be back later in the week as the prosecution wraps up its case and we start to see what the defense has in store. If you have any questions for me, I'd love to hear them. You might even hear me answer your question on the air. Give us a call at 929-388-1249. If you appreciate this coverage, please share it and give us a rating on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Thanks for listening. And if you're looking for even more coverage of the Diddy trial, you can check out Burden of the Case Against Diddy. The show streams weekdays at 5:30pm on ABC News Live. You can also find it on Disney+ Hulu or on most of your favorite streaming apps. I'm no tech genius, but I knew if I wanted my business to crush it, I needed a website. Now, thankfully, bluehost made it easy. I customized, optimized, and monetized everything exactly how I wanted with AI. In minutes, my site was up. I couldn't believe it. The search engine tools even helped me get more site visitors. Whatever your passion project is, you can set it up with Bluehost with their 30 day money back guarantee. What do you got to lose? Head to bluehost.com that's B L U E H O S T.com to start now.

[Narrator]

Hi, I'm Brad Milke.

[Brian Buckmire]

I'm the host of the Crime Scene.

[Narrator]

Weekly, a new show from ABC Audio.

[Brian Buckmire]

About the latest headlines in true crime.

[Narrator]

This week on the show, a man.

[Brian Buckmire]

Was allegedly held hostage and tortured at a New York City townhouse for over two weeks, and police say it was all for his Bitcoin password.

[Narrator]

Listen now on Apple, Spotify, Amazon, or wherever you get your podcasts.