Stephen K. Bannon (15:00)

Big victory on the 5th of November. Now the work can finally start on the big issues facing the country. One of the biggest is the national debt and the deficits that drive it. Hey, you think the country's broke? The country is broke. We're just printing money to keep this house of cards going, the strategy remains the same for you. You got to diversify, diversify your savings. That's why buy gold from Birchgold. So many things are out of your control, out of the president's control. It's important to have a safe haven for your savings. Birch Gold Group, my gold company, will help you convert an IRA or 401k into an IRA into physical gold. Let me repeat that. Convert your IRA or 401k into an IRA in physical gold. And the best news, it doesn't cost you a penny. Text ban into 989-898. Get your free info kit. Plus right now through Black Friday, you receive a free 1 ounce Silver Eagle for every $5,000 you purchase. Let me repeat that. A free 1 ounce Silver Eagle for every five thousand dollars purchased. Protect your savings with Birch Gold. Text Bannon to 989-898 and claim your eligibility for your free silver today.

Stephen K. Bannon (16:20)

Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

Natalie Winters (16:27)

You are back in the war room. It's still Natalie Winters hosting because Stephen K. Bannon is getting ready to speak and as you can imagine, busy with meetings in Palm Beach. Now we are joined by the one and only Jeff Clark, who you were telling me before the break that when they were doing a hit piece on you, someone once tried to claim that you were five foot four.

Jeff Clark (16:44)

Yes.

Natalie Winters (16:45)

So we can now attest because I'm five five, you're definitely taller than me. So to the Fannie Willis apparatus who tried to smear you for being short. Yes, that's definitely not true.

Jeff Clark (16:56)

Yeah, I joked that they were confusing me with Anthony Fauci. Anthony Fauci, Yeah.

Natalie Winters (17:04)

Many such cases. Well, there is some breaking news that I wanted to cover with you before we get into the, shall we call it, deep seated infestation over the Department of Justice, there's some breaking news that Donald Trump has now filed a motion to dismiss the 34 guilty verdicts in the Manhattan prosecution. Norm Eisen's busy melting down about it on Twitter, so I thought we should cover it. Can you sort of walk the audience through what's happening there?

Jeff Clark (17:26)

Sure. So, look, you know, they're throwing everything they can to convince Judge Justice Merchand to dismiss this case, and he really should. And, you know, one of the arguments made is that, look, you know, President Trump is about to assume the presidency, which is the most awesome office in the entire world. It's a busy office. Right. It requires the full attention of the person who's elected to that office. And so in light of that, you know, at the very least, this should be put on hold until after his presidency is over. And in reality, it should be dismissed because it's a. It's a bogus case. It's just adding to all of their existing grounds to dismiss the case. For instance, the main one that I'm fond of is the fact that after the Trump VUS immunity decision on July 1, President Trump has absolute immunity for consultations he had with his advisors inside the Oval Office, one of whom was Hope Hicks. And they just put her testimony on in front of the jury. And so the jury is. And the case is hopelessly corrupted by that testimony. And that testimony, you know, went into details shared in confidence. And the Supreme Court held that not only did they hold that he has a category of absolute immunity and a category of presumptive immunity, but they also held that they created a new exclusionary rule that said if you're talking about presidential communications that the president is entitled to have and he needs to have to discharge his office, that that cannot be introduced in any court. So that rule is completely violated. The evidence was introduced in court. Clearly, the press played and stressed the idea that his close advisor, Hope Hicks, had testified against him in this trial in Manhattan. And to try to say that that had no prejudicial effect on President Trump is ludicrous. So the whole case needs to be thrown out. And the only argument that it seems to me that I saw in this unfolding was norm Eisen starting 1 of x, 2 of x, 3 of x. The only real point I saw there was the idea that, look, the trial's already been completed, and so it's not going to be any additional burden on the presidency. But, no, there's going to be an appeal. There are going to be multiple appeals. Of course it creates a burden on the presidency. And it's not like the Clinton v. Jones case, where the conduct predated entirely by. By years, President Clinton becoming president when he was merely governor of Arkansas. This is conduct that they charged. And this was a fatal mistake of theirs, a fatal mistake of both Matthew Colangelo, who they sent up to Manhattan from New York, and Alvin Bragg to charge conduct that straddled the time when President Trump prior to him assuming office and after he took office. So having made that and then having put Hope Hicks in front of the jury, they can't unscramble that egg. The whole case needs to be tossed, or at the very least, there would need to be a new trial, and a trial would be burdensome and the trial couldn't possibly happen until after his presidency.

Natalie Winters (20:31)

But hang on, because I remember Norm Eisen had put out this long Twitter thread, essentially saying that it actually wouldn't be that much of a burden to President Donald Trump. And I think that there's an interesting sort of tell there, because this is the same chorus of people who tell us Putin is waiting to destroy the entire world order at any moment's notice. And everything that's going on in the Middle east acquires. It requires so much attention and trillions of our taxpayer dollars. So can you sort of drill down on that logic train for a little bit and how just bogus it is?

Jeff Clark (21:00)

Look, I mean, I'm a personal target of lawfare, and I can attest to the fact that it takes up lots of time. And that time is the cost is not only in the time, but in the opportunity cost of what could you have done with that time? And if you're the president of the United States, your opportunity costs, I would submit, are the highest of any single person in the world. And the American people don't want their president distracted by those kinds of things. And the Constitution trumps enforcement of New York law. The Constitution is the ultimate law, and the president has to be able to discharge his functions without impediment.

Natalie Winters (21:38)

I want to pivot now, though. It's all sort of related, but there was an interesting Washington Post article which Denver, if you want to toss up on screen amid worry about Trump, calls for career just department stop to stay. It goes through and it quotes how a ton of people are potentially interested in leaving doj. I think Matt Gates, I say that was sort of de facto schedule F, but they're sort of worried about who they could potentially see leading the department. I'm just curious your thoughts sort of internally, what you think is going on at doj. Do you think you're going to see that mass exodus, or do you think you're going to sort of see an internal resistance when these people embed and stay in?

Jeff Clark (22:13)

So let me start with the theory of the civil service, right? The theory of the civil service, Natalie, is that they're a neutral group of people. They're not invested in any particular policy. They just have expertise. They develop institutional knowledge that they can put to use for whoever their political superior officers are tracing all the way up to the presidency. That is the theory of the civil service. So if you have people who are saying, you know, I don't want to serve Republicans or I don't want to serve President Trump despite the Fact that he was overwhelmingly elected, both this time with a popular vote win and with a resounding win in the Electoral College. You're negating the entire theory of having a civil service. And that contradiction doesn't seem to stop anybody on msnbc. They want people to be inside resisting President Trump. And I saw resistance to President Trump, and I saw resistance when I was in the Bush administration, at the Justice Department, to the Bush administration. Right. These folks, you know, by and large, the surveys show that they're Democrats, and many of them refuse to accept this theory of the civil service. Their view is that whatever they think the right legal outcome is, that's the view that should control. And if you disagree, they have the duty, or, you know, they put it in very moralistic terms to try to get their way anyway by either slowing things down. I've had situations. I had one situation in Bush 43 where there was an official, very first Solicitor General meeting. I joined a career lawyer who was putting up on her personal blog information that we discussed in a confidential legal discussion up at the Solicitor General's office. I mean, it's just, like, mind blowing. Wow. And she was not disciplined for it, despite the fact that I called for it. And then I also had a situation where there was a career lawyer who disobeyed my order to remove an argument that was not a good argument and was, in fact, I think, contrary to the law from a brief. And I gave her some opportunities to argue against me to the contrary, and instead she put it in there anyway. I called for her to be disciplined as well, but the decision rested above me and she wasn't disciplined either. So I think that people now realize that President Trump, especially, is onto their game, and that people like Cash Patel will be onto their game over in the part of the Justice Department known as the FBI. And they know that that's not gonna be tolerated anymore, and these folks are gonna be disciplined, and they may even be separated from the civil service, and that's causing some of them to think, hey, maybe I should get out of here. That article you pointed to, though, did note that many of the expert observers of the legal market said there's no way the legal department, legal market could absorb all of these people. Right. So sort of like, woe for them, you know? Are you going to shed.

Natalie Winters (25:10)

Cry me a river.

Jeff Clark (25:11)

Yeah. Are you going to shed a tear for them, Natalie? That's what I was going to say.

Natalie Winters (25:13)

So I don't think I will be.

Jeff Clark (25:14)

Yeah. Now, in terms of the question of, like, will there Be a lot who leave versus will they stay and try to resist. I had a debate with a lawyer who actually represents a fair number of January Sixers. He thinks that a lot of those folks are going to leave and he knows them better than I do, so he might be right about that. But I tend to think that the general inclination will be what Merrick Garland is urging them to do, which is hold on tight. The republic needs you. And the republic is in the hands of the person.

Natalie Winters (25:47)

I think they use the word republic. I think they call it a democracy.

Jeff Clark (25:50)

They'll use it when they think, look, communists will use language.

Natalie Winters (25:54)

They're quite good at that.

Jeff Clark (25:55)

Yes. They'll use whatever language that they think is. Is necessary to their ends. Right. It's Alinskyite tactics. So even if they don't believe that there should be a republic, but if you actually understand the republic, the president is the representative of the people. He embodies the Republican system. And so of course, if there's a actual violation of law, but we're not talking about situations where the law is being violated. We're talking about situations where they would prefer that arguments were different. They would prefer if a different policy were pursued. They would pursue. They would prefer if some laws go unenforced and other laws are over enforced. Like they're really happy with Face act enforcement against abortion protesters. They don't like, you know, bringing reverse discrimination cases in the Civil Rights division if a white person is discriminated against. Right. These are the kinds of examples and that's just their policy preference. And that should have no weight at all in the equation of what they do. They're supposed to follow orders and they're supposed to carry out the president's decisions, not their own personal preferences.

Natalie Winters (27:01)

It's the underlying philosophy of, I think, what propelled the first impeachment and even to some extent, Right. The second impeachment policy. Disagreements from people like Alexander Vindman, Eric Charmella, all these horrible people. They thought that they were the ones who were elected by the American people. But it's the glowing example of what we need to get rid of. I want you to hang with us through the break.

Jeff Clark (27:19)

Sure.

Natalie Winters (27:20)

We're coming at you live from Palm Beach. Like I said, Stephen K. Bannon is, we'll say, out on assignment, not in prison. Always makes me happy to be able to say that. But in the meantime, you guys got to be checking out birchgold.com Bannon, give Philip Patrick and the team a call. My patriotsupply.com too. You never know what South Korea is now under, like, martial law. They just said politics is canceled. Sometimes I feel like that would be a good idea. No kidding. You got to check out my Patriot supply. Warpath coffee to promo code war room. That is Warpath coffee. Support all the sponsors of this show. We got Jeff Clark going to be joined later by Liz Harrington. Fulton county is up to, like I said, some. We'll use the word that President Trump likes to use, Skull Duggery, when it comes to election interference and dare I say, election fraud. We'll be right back after the short break.

Jeff Clark (28:15)

Terror in each sip and in each sub.

Stephen K. Bannon (28:19)

I've been telling you about cyber scammers who try to steal Graceland. The FBI calls this house stealing and it's a real threat. If you own a home or any real estate, pay close attention. When was the last time you checked the title to your home? With an average of 90% of your net worth in your home, criminals are targeting homeowners like never before. They can transfer your home title, take out loans in your name and leave you with a financial nightmare. Act now to protect your home's equity with triple lock protection from home title lock. Go to hometitle lock.com, enter your address and find out if your title is still in your own name. Use promo code Bannon to get a complete title scan. And your first 30 days are protection free. That's 30 days of free protection and peace of mind. Do not wait. Take action right now to protect your most valuable asset. Visit hometitlelock.com and use promo code Bannon. That's home title lock.com promo code Bannon. Please do this today.

Stephen K. Bannon (29:24)

Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

Natalie Winters (29:32)

You're back in the war room. We're gonna get to all the breaking news with Jamie Raskin, Fanny Willis, all these wonderful, lovely people with Jeff Clark. But before we pivot to that, just picking up where you left off, you said civil service, right? And I think that there's an interesting. It's sort of the other side of the coin of civil society, which has sort of been the moniker that Rachel Maddow and the whole kind of, you know, Resistance 2.0 has sort of described their activist cohort contingent as. So I'm curious, though, because there was a long form piece, I believe it was in the New York Times today, talking about how they're sort of struggling to find their financing, their big conference meeting that they had at the salamander in Washington, D.C. last week. Alex Soros was there, but other than that, no one really showed up in terms of billionaires. So as the sort of civil society aspect of it is, you know, a little strapped for cash, which make no mistake, they. I'm sure we'll find their cash. They'll look maybe overseas. But your thoughts on if you think then as a result, the civil service will sort of be a more important leg of the stool that comprises the resistance.

Jeff Clark (30:38)

So, yeah, I think that the funding for them is not going to dry up. And you need to understand that a lot of the resistance is going to be carried out by blue states and blue cities. And so their taxpayers are footing the bill to challenge the trumpet administration. Right.

Natalie Winters (30:53)

Like Newsom's $25 million fund.

Jeff Clark (30:55)

Newsom, the governor of Washington, you know, the, the blue state attorney generals. And I'm sure that, you know, people like Fani Willis, a local DA in a big city, are going to continue to pursue, you know, their destructive lawfare.

Natalie Winters (31:11)

You know, she needs to go on trips with Nathan Wade. Okay. Please.

Jeff Clark (31:15)

Yeah. How else are you?

Natalie Winters (31:15)

She works really hard.

Jeff Clark (31:17)

Napa Valley trip where you can drink Grey Goose. Look, there are also a lot of groups that are well funded generally. Right. It's the pop up groups. Like I saw a lot of new groups created during the Trump administration when I took over the civil division who were bringing immigration litigation. And the other thing that.

Natalie Winters (31:38)

Are those groups still around or do you think they'll create new ones?

Jeff Clark (31:41)

They're still around and I'm sure they'll create some new ones. But the point is that those were like relatively new organizations that I'd never heard of before I started defending some of the immigration lawsuits. But the environmental groups, like these things have been around for decades and decades. They're gonna keep trying to bring down President Trump's energy agenda, and they're not going anywhere. So, you know, it's. The augmentation factor for Trump might be a little bit more muted than it was in the first Trump term because of the fact that I think they don't think that Trump's as vulnerable as he was before. So I do think we're gonna see a lot of resistance inside the bureaucracy. I think we're gonna see blue states, blue cities pick up with a lot of litigation. And then here's the other factor to understand. A lot of the big law firms, most of the big law firms have become wokeified and they'll represent these organizations pro bono. You know, when I was litigating the census case in the Northern District of California out of Oakland, and Biden took the judge in that case who was totally trying to block everything we were doing and elevated her and put her on the 9th Circuit. And the group there was represented by a major law firm. And the signature block had four partners on it and six associates. It was overwhelming. And all of this was legal service at the highest possible quality level being provided for free in order to oppose the Trump administration. We're going to see more of that, too.

Natalie Winters (33:11)

It wasn't attorney Hunter Biden on there to pivot, though, to have sort of another leg of the stool that is the resistance. Well, I think even though they don't have the majority will be Congress, like Jamie Raskin, you see now sort of working hard to get the top seat on Judiciary to unseat Jerry Nadler. Your thoughts on why he is positioning himself particularly wanting to be at the helm of the Judiciary Committee.

Jeff Clark (33:36)

So look, I mean, as if Jerry Nadler, like, he's bad enough. And I remember one of my, one of my early experiences was seeing him in action in the minority on the Judiciary Committee going after Bobby Unser, of all people. So Bobby Unser, famous race car driver, he happened to, like, be, you know, snowmobiling around and he wandered into a national park because there was a big snowstorm. And they tried to, like, nail him to the wall for that. And so there was a hearing trying to expose over regulation and over criminalization in the environmental law area with Bobby Unter as the key witness. And Nadler was going after him like he was some kind of murderer or something. So he's bad. But think back to what happened on the first impeachment. Right. The Democrats didn't want to even trust Nadler to do that by himself, which was the traditional approach. They brought in Adam Schiff to also have parallel hearings.

Natalie Winters (34:36)

Adam Schiff, who doesn't think president should pardon family members. But I digress.

Jeff Clark (34:42)

Right. Yeah. He's obviously hypocritical on that, as is President Biden himself. Right. He said, I'm not going to pardon.

Natalie Winters (34:49)

Although Whoopi Goldberg on the View told me that it actually wasn't a lie. I said, well, here's the dictionary.

Jeff Clark (34:56)

Yeah. If you watch the View, you need to get some kind of brain disinfectant.

Natalie Winters (35:01)

I think could be a good merch line for you.

Jeff Clark (35:04)

Jeff Clark's brain disinfectant. So, look, you know, I think that Raskin, I mean, he is a true level of radical, and he's also more dangerous because he's smarter and he's trained as a law professor and Nadler is not.

Natalie Winters (35:22)

And so he's all in with the Mark Elias people. He's always doing their events. He's part of that apparatus.

Jeff Clark (35:28)

Exactly. And his father is a known Communist. And there was a big Heritage report in, in the 80s about how he was working with the Soviets. So, you know, he's bad news. He comes from a family where he learned the Communism, you know, around the table. And, you know, the Democrats, the radical, more radical progressive Democrats are getting very impatient. Like they say they believe in norms when they can try to weaponize it against President Trump, but they're ignoring the norms of seniority on committees and the like when it's convenient to them to be able to try to oppose and restrict and obstruct President Trump yet again.

Natalie Winters (36:03)

Yeah, that whole Color Revolution brigade of people, they seem to be quite hypocritical, but maybe that's because they have no real principles to stand for other than, I don't know, the destruction of this country. Just, just, just a thought. But to that point, of people who are intent on the destruction of this country, Fanny Willis. What is it? Big Fanny, as Mike Davis would say, will pay homage to him. Interesting FOIA case between her and Judicial Watch's Tom Fitton. Can you walk the audience through the latest on that?

Jeff Clark (36:31)

Sure. So, you know, Tom, and Judicial Watch, using local counsel down in Georgia, they asked for materials under the Open Government act in Georgia, the equivalent of FOIA on the Georgia state side. And they wanted to see what evidence there was, what documents there were of coordination between Fani Willis and the January 6th committee and between Fani Willis and the Biden White House Counsel's office. Of course, we're told that Joe Biden and his people have nothing to do with anything like that happening on the state level. And there are documents, there is correspondence between these federal authorities and Fani Willis. Indeed, at a personal level, I can tell you that I called for these materials through my lawyers, and the judge actually declined to give them to us, and he put the information under seal. So I can't see it. My lawyers can't see it, but there's something there. And so Fani Willis had denied this state FOIA request of Judicial Watch and said, we don't have any responsive documents. And pointing to things like, I just described my own personal experience and other indicators that there actually is correspondence that that is responsive to the FOIA request, the Open Government act request. They sued, and Fani Willis did not show up to defend that case, didn't file a brief, and the judge entered a default judgment against Fani Willis and said you must produce those documents within five business days. So next Tuesday we should see what she coughs up. And I think if she doesn't cough something up, she's potentially at contempt risk from the judge who entered that order.

Natalie Winters (38:19)

Our grey goose girl is going to have to show some good show some receipts I want to bring in real quick. We got Liz Harrington. By the way, we've promoted Jeff Clark to co host with me for the hour. Thank you. I've deputized you as a war room co host. Liz Harrington joins us now. Speaking of Georgia, I know you were tweeting up a storm today about how Fulton county has sued the state election board to try to avoid handing over records related to the 2020 election. Can you walk us through that? Sure.

Liz Harrington (38:50)

Thanks so much, Natalie. Well, we covered a similar instance a couple months back with Fulton county hiring a high priced attorney at $600 an hour to avoid an independent monitor over the 2024 election. And both of these instances stem from the historic state election board case 2023 025, which proved that the 2020 election results, the recount was fraudulent. They counted duplicate ballots. They were tens of thousands of votes short. The whole thing was a fraud. They have been. The state election board has been keeping this case alive. They voted to subpoena all of these election records which Fulton county has been hiding for over four years now. They voted, they issued this subpoena. Fulton county had a deadline to respond by November 18th. And what did they do on November 18th? They hired the same law firm without a vote of the board of commissioners in Fulton county, just unilaterally, the chairperson hired back this attorney, filed a lawsuit against the state election board to try to quash this subpoena which would reveal all of the records from 2020 having to deal with the mail in ballots, the tabulation tapes, the open tapes, the closed tapes, many of which are missing, by the way, and have been missing since the 2020 election because we know that they stole that election. And so to this day, they are now lawyering up once again trying to get it to a friendly judge to avoid having to turnover the records of what they claimed was the most secure election in history. And this just proves once again that Fulton county has so much to hide. They are so corrupt. They do not run fair elections. And I really hope the state election board continues to pursue this because they're going to keep rigging their elections down in Fulton county unless somebody stops him.

Jeff Clark (40:59)

So, Liz, what possible explanation could they have? Reason, you know, not to Give the State Election Board right, who are in charge of overseeing the elections, the information that the State Election Board has subpoenaed. It seems to be a head scratcher.

Liz Harrington (41:13)

It absolutely is, Jeff. It's insane. And this is the same type of thing that they did before because the State Election Board has the right to look at these records. They've blocked Dr. Janice Johnston for probably over a year now. And looking at these records, Brad Raffensperger's General Counsel, Charlie McGowan, actually held a lot of these records hostage from members of the own State Election board because they didn't want them to see them. If they would promise the State Election Board, if they would promise to drop this case, if they would promise not to say that this case was closed. And they said, we're not going to do that. You can't close a case when all your underlying evidence you won't let us see that is supposed to be the basis for why you would close it. And so this is the same thing here. We've seen Raffensperger's office work in conjunction with Fulton county in trying to get the former general counsel for Raffensperger to lead the monitoring team they were coordinating together to try to not have an independent monitor over the 2024 election. So it's all the same thing. There's no real legal basis. But unfortunately, as you know, Jeff, some of these judges down in Georgia don't always follow the law either.

Natalie Winters (42:42)

Liz Harrington, if people want to follow you, keep up to date on all of this. I know you're always ahead of the curve. Where can they go to do that?

Liz Harrington (42:48)

War room.org and on X&Truth Social EAL.

Natalie Winters (42:52)

Liz USA a must follow. Liz, thank you so much for joining us. Warren Posse. Hang with us through this short break, maybe. In the meantime, go check out birchgold.com Bannon or Sacred Human Health. I know Jeff Clark is big on the beef liver. Chris.

Jeff Clark (43:08)

I haven't tried them yet.

Natalie Winters (43:09)

Okay. We're gonna have to work on that if you want to be going.

Jeff Clark (43:14)

They're on my list.

Natalie Winters (43:16)

That's a good euphemistic spin. We'll take it. Sacredhumanhealth.com we'll be right back.

Stephen K. Bannon (43:23)

Are you tired of progressive corporations that continue to further alienate conservative Americans, all the while eroding the future of the American dream? Companies like Starbucks Strong, strong Army customers to support abortion or PayPal, canceling accounts or political views. Maybelline making a mockery of women by supporting transgender models. And Bud Light forcing gender ideology on you when all you want is to enjoy a cold beer. But thanks to Public Square, you don't have to fund companies like this any longer. Public Square connects you to tens of thousands of businesses that share your value for life, family, freedom. Whether you're looking to buy coffee, find a new athletic brand that knows what a woman is, shop for clean skin care, or just find a restaurant in your community that won't lecture you about your political views, publicsquare.com is your resource. It's free to join, plus you get discounts to many of the high quality businesses on the platform. Start spending your hard earned money on companies that don't hate you. Let me repeat that. Start spending your money on companies that hate you. Join me in millions of patriotic Americans who love truth, our country and our constitution@publicsquare.com Download the app now or visit the site at publicsquare.com that's publicsquare.com Take action today. Action, action, action.

Stephen K. Bannon (44:51)

Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

Natalie Winters (44:59)

You are back in the war room. Natalie Winters and my wonderful esteemed co host, Jeff Clark. Now, I know we're told by the mainstream media that we're crazy for wanting to use what President Trump's mandate, overwhelming victory to look into 2020 election fraud. I know all the MSNBC hosts, which we commiserate and how much we love watching them, are melting down at that prospect. So can you sort of walk us through your opinion, your analysis as to how the best way to go about adjudicating that affair, that skullduggery, I just love that word. But that Liz was sort of alluding to in the last block. But it's obviously, you know, broader than just the state of Georgia.

Jeff Clark (45:37)

Look, you know, there were people at the Justice Department who took the position that the Justice Department doesn't have a role in investigating state elections. And that's just manifestly untrue. And, you know, that's why the Biden administration was sending monitors in terms of the election. It's why the acting assistant attorney general at the start of the Biden administration sent a letter to those in Arizona who were doing the audit telling them, don't, don't go do the canvas. That we're gonna view that as election interference and intimidation of voters.

Natalie Winters (46:12)

Pamela Carlin.

Jeff Clark (46:13)

Pamela Carlin, you know, who, who also got a special ethics exception to continue collecting her $900,000 a year Stanford Law salary while she worked for the Justice Department. You know, meanwhile, I was forced to resign my position, my unpaid position from the Federalist Society when I started in the Trump administration, you know. Double standard much?

Natalie Winters (46:33)

Well, that's because you weren't an impeachment witness. You left that off her resume too.

Liz Harrington (46:36)

Right.

Natalie Winters (46:37)

You didn't smear Barron Trump.

Jeff Clark (46:38)

That's right, yeah. That's payment for services rendered to the party. Yeah. Look, I think the Justice, Justice Department, Natalie, needs to look at the 2020 election and deeply investigate it. And I know that from what President Trump has said publicly, he wants that to happen and that can be unfolded in stages. And, you know, I'd also like to see, particularly since the Republicans control both houses of Congress, for the Judiciary Committee to on both houses to start investigating as well. I think that that's a look back that the people of America really want to see happen. And I don't think they're buying the idea that asking those kinds of questions and demanding that kind of investigation is all part of crazy conspiracy thinking. Here we are, four years later, and we still can't see the information that the state election board wants to get from Fulton County. I mean, that's ipso facto something that smells to the high heavens in the law. There's this principle that if you destroy evidence, that's spoliation and, and negative inferences can be taken against you for destroying evidence. At this point, four years, if you're stonewalling and you're not turning the evidence over so that it can be looked at independently, that really smells very, very bad.

Natalie Winters (47:51)

Well, and I think it's quite interesting too, when you sort of juxtapose this whole election meltdown narrative. They're always hammering on MSNBC that, oh, the American people didn't know what they were voting for when they supported Trump. Right. They didn't want the deportations, they didn't want, want the retribution. Like, don't culturally appropriate us, msnbc, we know exactly what we want and what we voted for. But I think the sort of other side of the coin, there is this idea that, well, you know, when it comes to looking into stolen elections that, oh, suddenly they've moved on from the election integrity effort. Right. People are no longer. That's not true at all. The only reason that we won was because we were able to actually make it too big to rig by really staking out the war. And Posse played such a critical role and that sort of boots on the ground form of fraud. Obviously, Mark Zuckerberg's contributions of probably $1 billion help just a little bit. So thanks for coming to Mar a Lago, but we'll maybe pass on that, Jeff, I think we're gonna have to bring Mike Lindell on. But I will say I'm gonna give you a chance to redeem yourself. You have to choose between Government Gangsters the film, or Rebels, Rogues and Outlaws, the book, which I feel like you were at the launch party for both. You can only choose one. Which one do you go with?

Jeff Clark (49:01)

I can't choose my own movie?

Natalie Winters (49:05)

I bet all you can.

Jeff Clark (49:08)

I think I would choose Government Gangsters because it's a movie and so I like moving pictures. But I do think the book's excellent as well.

Natalie Winters (49:17)

There we go. We just killed two ad reads.

Jeff Clark (49:19)

There you go.

Natalie Winters (49:19)

And Jeff Clark. Pimp yourself out where people want to follow you. Get all the books, everything. Where can they go?

Jeff Clark (49:26)

All right, without endorsing that handoff, we're.

Natalie Winters (49:29)

Standing, so it's super casual.

Jeff Clark (49:31)

Okay, Very good. So. And you caused my earpiece to pop out with that one. So I'm Jeff Clark at jeffclarkus on X& Getter and at Real Jeff Clark on Truth Social. And you can follow the doings of the center for Renewing America@americarenewing.com thank you.

Natalie Winters (49:52)

For co hosting with me. Always an honor and a pleasure. Mike Lindell, someone who is also an honor and a pleasure to have on War Room. Hit us with the latest.

Stephen K. Bannon (50:02)

Well, I do want to say, Natalie, that. Yeah, the 2020 election, my team, we're getting it out there. We, we will never stop. You go to lindellplan.com you can learn all about it. We've got it all. We've had it all. And we will get this to fruition, where we will end up in our country with paper ballots and counted. But all that being said, that's why they attacked me. That's why the IRS just two weeks ago. Now they're attacking me again before this administration leaves. But what we've done is you. The War Room policy, with their great support, we're extending Black Friday sale and Cyber Mondays. If you go. If you go ahead and put it up, we've got all the premium pillows that right there. This is the one. You guys have all loved the premium MyPillows that. 1898 for the Queen, 1998 for the King, 749 for the MyPillow 2.0. You guys, all of these specials are still there. And what we've done, we have the 60 day money back guarantee extended out to March 1st of 2025. So you can do all your Christmas shopping with these specials there. We're Leaving them up for the war room posse. You go to the MyPillow website, go down till you see our great leader Steve there, click on him and do all your Christmas shopping right now, all of it. You have the MyPillow mattress topper. Get yourself one of them, get yourself a new bed. You get an extra dollars off besides saving up to 50%. And all of these, you know, they get yourself a great gift there. And then you have all the towels came in, the slippers, all that's in now for Christmas and you guys get the biggest discounts of anyone in history. The bathrobes, the sheets, the bed sheets, the Giza dream bed sheets, all of it. The kitchen towels, they're all in. They're on sale with Black Friday special. You see there the towels and dish cloths, 1498. So you guys take advantage of this. And also don't forget mystore.com over 2000 entrepreneurs there and thousands of products. Check that out. Promo code, war room.

Stephen K. Bannon (52:12)

Promo code, war room.

Stephen K. Bannon (52:13)

Promo code, war room. Same one, same. And it's a win, win, win. Right Natalie?

Natalie Winters (52:18)

It's a win, win, win, win. Although I think think with promo Code Biden, you get even a better deal where you can commit what, decades worth of crimes against the American people and get off scot free, right?

Stephen K. Bannon (52:29)

Yeah, right.

Natalie Winters (52:31)

Living in Joe Biden's America is Mike Lindell. Thank you so much for joining us. And Warren Posse, thank you for hanging with me for this hour. And of course, Jeff Clark, thank you for burying me for this this last hour. Don't worry, Stephen K. Bannon will be back tomorrow morning. In the meantime, I hope you guys have have a good one.

Stephen K. Bannon (52:50)

I want to warn you of a huge change that could be coming to our money in our bank accounts. First, think back to 9 11, shortly after the government pushed through the Patriot Act. This gave the government power to spy on innocent Americans by monitoring our phone and email and tracking our movement across the Internet. Now Jim Rickards, editor of the independent financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence and New York Times best selling author, is warning about a coming event that could elevate this governmental surveillance to a terrifying new level. In fact, some of the guests I've had on the War Room believe that the government will soon expand their powers to track our every move. If we say the wrong things on social media, donate to the wrong causes, buy firearms, or even vote maga, the government may be able to shut us out of our bank accounts. I can't say for sure if this will happen, but it's an interesting and dire warning. Fortunately, Jim Rickards, an American patriot and friend of mine, has made it his mission to educate us on what he believes is coming and how to protect yourself from the possibility of programmable money. Watch Jim's warning video now before it's censored like I've been in the past. Go to rickardswarroom.com that's rickardswarroom.com now to.

G (54:09)

See the video will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health. So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements and of course, the beef liver being our flagship products. For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc. And because it is 100% grass fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general. So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com and cheers to your health.

Stephen K. Bannon (54:54)

700,000Americans every year. Yes, heart disease is the number one killer every year, year in and year out. Heart disease builds over time. Hypertension, high blood pressure, bad cholesterol, diabetes, all of it affects our heart. A healthy heart is key to being energetic. As we get older, it is never too early to take care of your heart. You see, heart disease sneaks up on us. You can start in your 30s and when this happens, you're at serious risk by the time you turn 60. If you want to take care of your heart and those you care about, please go to war roomhealth.com that's war room health.com all one word war roomhealth.com use the code war room at checkout to save 67% of your first shipment. That's code war room at checkout to save sixty seven percent and do it again. War room health all one word war roomhealth.Com go there today. You need if you're going to be part of the posse, you need a strong heart. You need a lion's heart. It how we're going to do that is with salty. Go there, do it today. Check it out.