Episode 4274: He Who Saves His Country, Violates No Laws

Summary

Podcast Summary: Bannon’s War Room - Episode 4274: He Who Saves His Country, Violates No Laws

Release Date: February 17, 2025

---

Introduction

In Episode 4274 of Bannon’s War Room, host Stephen K. Bannon delves deep into the ongoing conflict between President Donald Trump and the established legal and administrative structures. Titled "He Who Saves His Country, Violates No Laws," the episode explores themes of executive power, the rule of law, and the historical parallels that frame the current political landscape. Featuring insights from historian Jon Meacham, legal analyst Mike Davis, and guest Julie Kelly, the discussion navigates through constitutional debates, legal battles, and strategic movements within the Republican Party.

---

1. Presidential Power and Constitutional Boundaries

The episode opens with a compelling dialogue between Stephen K. Bannon and historian Jon Meacham. They dissect whether American presidents have historically exceeded constitutional limits to govern effectively.

• Historical Comparisons: Meacham draws parallels between President Trump and historical figures like Napoleon Bonaparte and Abraham Lincoln, questioning if Trump's actions align with or diverge from traditional executive authority.

  “Is President Trump doing something that if it's in a particularly vociferous way. Is it justified by the circumstances or is he doing it simply because he can?” [00:54]

• Executive Overreach: The discussion highlights instances where presidents may have overstepped, such as Jefferson’s Louisiana Purchase and Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, weighing these against Trump’s current administration actions.

  “To me, that's the question is, are we doing things? Is President Trump doing something that... is it justified by the circumstances or is he doing it simply because he can?” [04:01]

---

2. Current Administration’s Challenges to the Rule of Law

Stephen Bannon engages with Mike Davis and Julie Kelly to unpack the Trump administration’s legal confrontations, particularly focusing on efforts to challenge the Department of Justice (DOJ) and judicial actions perceived as obstructive.

• Legal Scrutiny: Julie Kelly discusses Andrew McCarthy’s seven-part series criticizing Attorney General Pam Bondi and the DOJ’s alleged politicization.

  “...Andrew McCarthy... is going to write a piece every day, Julia Kelly's going to deconstruct it.” [08:03]

• Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs): The conversation delves into recent court cases where TROs have been issued against Trump’s executive actions, exemplifying what Bannon describes as “judicial sabotage.”

  “This court should not allow lower courts to seize executive power by dictating to the President how long he must continue employing an agency head against his will.” [35:19]

---

3. Unified Executive Theory and Its Implications

The discussion shifts to the Unified Executive Theory, a constitutional principle asserting that the President holds exclusive authority over the executive branch. Mike Davis elaborates on how this theory underpins Trump’s actions to reclaim executive power from what he terms the "deep state."

• Article II Powers: Davis emphasizes the President’s constitutional duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed, arguing that court interventions undermine these powers.

  “He has the power under, under article to take care that our laws are faithfully executed.” [38:05]

• Impoundment and Rescission: The conversation touches on Trump’s ability to impound or reallocate funds deemed wasteful, positioning it as a legitimate use of executive authority.

  “If the President of the United States... knows that Congress has mistakenly appropriated money to the UN and Gaza... does the President have the power as the chief executive officer and the commander in chief to stop that appropriated money... Answer is hell yes.” [40:12]

---

4. The Role of the Supreme Court and Judicial Activism

Bannon and Davis discuss the critical role of the Supreme Court in adjudicating disputes between the executive branch and lower courts, especially regarding emergency docket cases that could redefine executive authority.

• Emergency Docket Usage: Davis explains the mechanics of the Supreme Court's emergency docket, highlighting its importance in quickly resolving cases that lower courts mishandle.

  “The justices must step up and use the emergency docket because we can't wait weeks, months or years for the President to be able to use his article to power to fire executive branch officials that he doesn't want working for him.” [35:35]

• Potential Supreme Court Involvement: The dialogue anticipates the Supreme Court’s likely intervention in affirming or contesting Trump’s executive actions, stressing the long-term implications for presidential power.

  “If they do Not Protect Article 2 Powers of the President of the United States, this is gonna be very damaging to the presidency long term.” [38:39]

---

5. Strategic Movements and Call to Action

Towards the end of the episode, Bannon and Davis outline strategic efforts to mobilize support within the Republican base and counteract legal and political challenges. They emphasize the importance of media engagement, public opinion, and grassroots activism.

• Media and Public Engagement: Davis underscores the necessity of leveraging media platforms and social media to influence public perception and pressure judicial bodies.

  “The call to action is for people to continue to use the megaphone, use X, use getter, use truth, get out there with opinion pieces.” [41:24]

• Organizational Efforts: Bannon promotes upcoming events and strategic initiatives aimed at fortifying the movement against perceived deep state interference.

  “We're going to lay out the battle map of where it's all going in federal courts.” [16:40]

---

Conclusion

Episode 4274 of Bannon’s War Room provides a thorough exploration of the tensions between President Trump’s administration and the entrenched legal institutions. Through historical analogies, legal analyses, and strategic discussions, Stephen K. Bannon and his guests argue that Trump’s actions are a necessary assertion of executive power to combat what they perceive as a corrupt and obstructive establishment. The episode calls listeners to engage actively in supporting these efforts to preserve constitutional integrity and executive authority.

---

Notable Quotes

• “Is President Trump doing something that if it's in a particularly vociferous way. Is it justified by the circumstances or is he doing it simply because he can?”
  Jon Meacham [00:54]

• “This court should not allow lower courts to seize executive power by dictating to the President how long he must continue employing an agency head against his will.”
  Mike Davis [35:19]

• “If the President of the United States... knows that Congress has mistakenly appropriated money to the UN and Gaza... does the President have the power as the chief executive officer and the commander in chief to stop that appropriated money... Answer is hell yes.”
  Mike Davis [40:12]

• “The justices must step up and use the emergency docket because we can't wait weeks, months or years for the President to be able to use his article to power to fire executive branch officials that he doesn't want working for him.”
  Mike Davis [35:35]

• “The call to action is for people to continue to use the megaphone, use X, use getter, use truth, get out there with opinion pieces.”
  Mike Davis [41:24]

---

Disclaimer

This summary is intended to provide an overview of the podcast episode based on the provided transcript. It aims to capture the key discussions, insights, and conclusions presented by the speakers. For a comprehensive understanding, listeners are encouraged to access the full episode.

Transcript

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Who's basically saying, I am the law. I'm above the law. Yeah.

[Jon Meacham]

Napoleon Bonaparte, of course, declared himself Emperor of France in the wake of a revolution intimately linked with ours. Sorry, Caddy, I know this is a rough day for you, given 1776 through the caddy actually has a On Yorktown, she wears black. The anniversary. But what of the United States of America, as Thomas Paine said, is that in America, the law would be king. Now, I am not going to naively or sentimentally sit here and say that no American president in history has ever gone beyond the bounds of the Constitution in order to govern. They have always followed the letter of the law. That is not true.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Right.

[Jon Meacham]

Thomas Jefferson bought Louisiana from Napoleon, by the way, calling it a fugitive occurrence. It was not strictly within the bounds of the law. If Alexander Hamilton had tried to do it, Jefferson, his head would have exploded. But people tend to be against executive power until they have it, which is an important thing to remember. This is about context, balance and scope. Did Abraham Lincoln go beyond the bounds of the Constitution to save the Constitution? Yes. I just ask you, and I ask the country to think about is this a crisis on the scale of the Civil War is when President Trump came in to now it's emerging as a very important, critically important moment about the rule of law. But it begins with President Trump telling us essentially that the country is in the. I'm paraphrasing, but only narrowly, is in the grip of a dark and even evil force, and that he alone is going to break that grip and therefore enter Napoleon from the Internet. Therefore, anyone who saves the country and breaks that grip is intrinsically heroic. And the danger we have here is that if in fact, President Trump believes that anything he does is justified, then we are in a place where we genuinely have not been before, having presidents who have violated the letter and even at times, the spirit of the Constitution. The Declaration is something we have had before. Sometimes we view it well, which I think Lincoln ultimately is redeemed by saving the union, by suspending, you know, when he suspended habeas corpus, shouldn't have done it ideally, did it? Union survives. We still go to the Lincoln Memorial. But some of the darks, some of the dark chapters that presidents then have to endure for all of history, the internment of the Japanese Americans during World War II is something that Franklin Roosevelt's administration always has to bear, and that was a violation of the spirit of the Declaration and the Constitution. To me, that's the question is, are we doing things? Is President Trump doing something that if it's in a particularly vociferous way. Is it justified by the circumstances or is he doing it simply because he can?

[Steve Bannon]

This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. Prison's not got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. The people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it.

[Mike Davis]

It's going to happen.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA Media I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.

[Steve Bannon]

Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose?

[Stephen K. Bannon]

If that answer is to save my.

[Steve Bannon]

Country, this country will be saved.

[Mike Davis]

War Room here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

It's Monday, the 17th of February in the year of our Lord 2025. It's President's Day, and Meacham once again is a very confused guy. Hates Trump so much, is very, very corn fused. It's President's Day, and throughout the day we will be going through President Trump, the 47th president of the United States, taking on the administrative state in the deep state as he tries to save his country. This controversy came with President Trump put up on TR Social. He who a quote from Napoleon, or maybe it's apocryphal. He who saves his country, breaks no laws. That was tied to Napoleon coming back from Egypt when he returned and then joined, I guess the triumvirate running, running Paris at the time. He said, I found the crown of France in the gutters of the streets of Paris and all I need to do is take my saber and pick it up. He was talking about the lack of really political control as the revolution grinded on. I might want to mention to Meacham and his talk about the founders. Nobody talks about this episode but Alexander Hamilton, the Federalists, not only they weren't for standing guard, but they wanted a huge army at one point in time to put down, I think it was the Whiskey Rebellion and basically get taxes. They brought Washington back to command the army in Adams's first term. Adams only term, I think it was in 1798 and it was a Hamilton scheme. Hamilton made himself a major general in the army and this is going to be a huge effort to go, I think, put down the Whiskey Rebellion and to make sure I was in western Pennsylvania and get the tax revenue. Whiskey Rebellion, I believe it was kind of Cratered. I'm doing this from memory, but Alexander Hamwood, these guys would break the law all the time if it was to their benefit. You just got to understand the foundation of the country. Hey, it was very dicey there for a number of years in the founding of the Republic. Very dicey, in fact. And they all hated each other, hated each other's guts so much that Burr later essentially executed Hamilton in a duel. Jefferson had Burr tried for treason in a plot with General Montgomery to maybe carve off Texas and build their own empire. Adams and Jefferson hated each other and they all hated Hamilton, who hated them all back. Washington was kind of above the fray. But no, come on. What President Trump is doing here is trying to take on administrative say you see how hard it is. Can't even get a corrected count, even number. Anyway, we're going to get it all into it. We're going to do the courts, we're going to do Ukraine. There's like five meetings going on. General Kellogg didn't make the plane. Zelensky's not invited. But I want to start off Julie Kelly. Julie Kelly joins us by phone and Mike Davis gonna a minute. So I got, I got the McCarthy, I got the McCarthy series of seven of Andrew McCarthy just going off viciously. This is the National Review crowd. You can never satisfy these guys, these wimps who have done, who essentially lost the country and allowed the deep state to run the deal.

[Mike Davis]

Right.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

And kind of went along. The controlled opposition has now got their backup. Also, there's a big hearing at 11 o'clock this morning as President Trump, I guess, is also going to the Supreme Court. Mike Davis is here on the legal front. It's guns up and everybody shooting at everybody. Julie, make it make sense for me.

[Julie Kelly]

Well, first let's address Andrew McCarthy, who is the legal analyst for National Review and Fox News, who announced over the weekend he would be publishing a seven article series criticizing Attorney General Pam Bondi and her DOJ and attempts to depoliticize the Department of Justice. Now, this is consistent with the President's executive order that he issued on day one to root out the political weaponization of the country's most powerful law enforcement organization, an institution, by the way, that has historically low public trust numbers, especially among Republicans. Of course, the repudiation of the lawfare against the President, his advisors like you, and almost 1,600 of his supporters over January 6, electing him with a partial repudiation of this lawfare. But leave it to Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor hasn't been in The DOJ for a very long time, stepping up now to defend his former, well, the rank and file of his former employer, the doj, and attacking Pam Bondi, who has been on the job, I think 11 days so far. And so this is a series that I will be covering. I posted some of it yesterday. He has a new article out today about really gotta applaud him for his bandwidth and his workhorse ethic here. One long article a day over seven days. That's a lot to produce. So this is where the National Review is going once again back to another Trump roots and defending the indefensible Department of Justice.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Yeah, exactly. When we got to be united, naturally those guys are going to come out and, and, you know, have their, have their say. You want to know about these prosecutors, they're supposed to be so great. Why did they stick around for all the Biden when they resigned? Where's all their, where's all their profiles and courage during the weaponization Crickets? What they did is that they were the henchmen. They were all, we were just following orders. No, no, no. It didn't work for the ss, didn't work for the Gestapo in Germany after the war. Oh, we were just following orders. That's not good enough. Soon as Trump gets in there, boom, they all got it. They're all, they're all profiles encouraged and lauded by the left wing media. Talk to me today about the court cases. What's Mike Davis is here. We're going to the Supreme Court. President Trump's forcing, having a forcing function today that could get pretty important about where we're going in all of this. What's happened at 11 with your favorite judge, Julie Kelly.

[Julie Kelly]

Yeah, so 11:00 here. And I will be covering this on X at 11:00am Eastern Time. This is related to a temporary restraining order, a lawsuit filed by several blue states, including California, Michigan and Massachusetts, trying to stop Elon Musk and Doge from doing what they're doing, which is exposing to the American people for the very first time all of the wasteful, excessive, unaccountable spending that Doge is uncovering, especially at usaid. So these attorneys generals for these states are asking Tanya Chutney to enter apro, which of course We've seen several D.C. judges already do that related to other lawsuits trying to stop the Trump administration from exercising their, you know, his presidential authority. And so that's at 11 o'clock to see if she will order this temporary restraining order, basically putting a halt to Elon Musk while she considers a preliminary injunction. Now, on a related note, there was a lawsuit filed by Hampton Dellinger, the Biden appointed head of the office of Special Counsel. Hampton Dellinger, a buddy of Hunter Biden's. They used to work together at Boise Schiller during the whole Burismont scandal. He was appointed to a top spot at DOJ by Joe Biden in 2021, then moved to head of the Office of Special Counsel. Donald Trump fired him on February 7th. He filed a lawsuit a few days later, again seeking a temporary restraining order. Judge Amy Berman Jackson, one of our other favorites, Trump hating Judge Obama appoints The on the D.C. circuit entered that temporary restraining order forcing Donald Trump to put Hampton Dellinger back into this very powerful unaccountable post where he can issue open up investigations into violations of the Hatch Act. Of course, that was a favorite tool during the first Trump administration and other things that he basically can do on his own. Abraham Jackson ordering Hampton Dellinger back into that office. But the circuit court over the weekend in a split decision, two Democrat Biden appointees, one Trump appointees. Greg Katz in a dissenting and Mike Davis can talk about this as well. He said that that opinion that order should be appealable. Temporary restraining orders typically are not. But because this clearly violates Donald Trump's authority, presidential authority, Article 2 authority that Hampton Dellinger should be removed, that that CRO should be vacated and this is actually a danger that this Democrat appointee poses to the president and his administration. So they filed an application. The solicitor general, the new solicitor general for the president filed emergency application before the Supreme Court. They'll take that up in the next day or so to reverse that temporary restraining order and allow the president to fire Biden appointees.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hampton challenger we got to bounce. What's your social media? You're going to be going live at 11. What's your social media? Where do people get you?

[Julie Kelly]

Julie Underscore Kelly to.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Julie Kelly. We'll have you back on this afternoon. Talk about all of Julie Kelly. Short break. Davis on the other side. We're going to lay out the battle map of where it's all going in federal courts. I'm tell I'm still telling them watch the New York City Watch Manhattan where evil lurks. Short commercial break Johnny Khan takes us out with American Heart. Mike Davis, It's President's Day 2025 in the world.

[Steve Bannon]

Have you seen the news from economists forecasting a depression? I'm not talking recession, I mean depression by the year 2030. We're in a perfect storm as Social Security and Medicare hit a breaking point with the largest generation hitting retirement. A smaller workforce means a smaller tax base. Pair that with our growing national debt and rising cost of living and you got a problem. And I mean a big problem. So what are you going to do now to protect your family for the future? Gold is a safe haven in hard economic times and Birch Gold makes it easy to diversify a portion of your savings into physical gold. Birchgold will help you transition an existing IRA or 401k into an IRA in gold and it doesn't cost you a penny out of pocket. Protect your future and protect it today. Text Bannon B A N n o n to 989-898 get your free info kit on Gold and a copy of the Ultimate Gold Guide for the Trump Era. That's the Ultimate Gold Guide for Gold in the Trump Era with Forward by Donald J. Trump Jr. There's no obligation. This is only information. Birch Gold has earned the trust of countless Americans looking to safeguard their savings. You can count on them too. Text my name Bannon to number 989898. Remember, the ultimate guide for Investing in Gold in the Trump Era. Forward by Don junior Birch Gold do it today.

[Mike Davis]

Here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Okay cpac. We want everybody there particularly in the region. If you can get there ticks or 76 boxcpac.org war room Wednesday the whole day we're going to have an amazing, amazing four days to get to know everybody, have some one on one time. We're going to do an incredible and Grace and Mo and the team have been working on the Force Multiply Academy. We're trying to jam everything. It won't be as crazy jammed as last year. We're going to actually give it some more space to breathe because we have some drill downs we've got to do with the posse. It will be streamed but to be there in person will be next level. Jack Posobec is committed to Real America's Voice to do his show live. So we're going to do the War Room live on Wednesday from the space we're going to have the Force Multiplier Academy. Jack Basova is going to do it at two so you're going to get at least three hours of show and the show is going to be integrated into the Force Multiplier Academy. So we want to see everybody there and it'll be a good situation report of where we stand and what's going on and what we need to do to man the rampart. Second and third Tier nominees are coming up. Cash Patel still come up. So we're still going to have to man the ramparts. I'm going to say a little bit about that in a while about Bridge Colby, one of the, one of the guys, the policy guy over at the Pentagon that's been getting a lot of grief behind the scenes, being knifed up a lot behind the scenes. We're going to try to sort things out on that. Really a big fan of his book Strategic Denial, the strategy of denial in talking about the Chinese Communist Party. I want to do the legal because they hold out in this resistance as they always do, their default position. In fact, John Hamid gave the game away the other day. He was on msnbc. He says, hey, the courts bailed us out in the elections of 2020. His words, not mine. And now they're bailing us out now. So the courts all over the place and they got these walking to one judge and the judge rules for the whole country. And I want to get to also the because you're seeing this already in the ranks, the people that can draft off President Trump, that can dine off President Trump's policies are not really populist nationalists. They're not America First. They're still globalist, they're still established order Republicans, National Review always being the worst. And they've just got a full on attack by Andy McCarthy. In fact, let's deal with that first in this thing in the Southern District. Mike, you put up some pretty hot talk over the weekend on your Twitter feed about the sdny. Now look, the woman Sassoon is a clerk for Scalia, right, brother? Come on, he picked the best. They got a couple other guys like a war hero in there. This should be the flower of what you've been working for Davis, the Federalist Society, Mike Davis. You guys have worked for years. You've labored in the Vineyard to get quality people like that into justice as US Attorneys and into main justice. Why all of a sudden, why are seven of them? This is worse than the Saturday, I call it the St. Valentine's Day Massacre. Why is this, why is this actually a positive for President Trump instead of being the overwhelming negative that Andrew McCarthy now says essentially, basically, he's going to write a piece every day, Julia Kelly's going to deconstruct it. But at the end of it, he's going to say Trump should resign because he's already broken the Constitution. He'd just walk away before he gets impeached, sir.

[Mike Davis]

So I just published Last night a FoxNews.com opinion piece on this very topic where you have this interim U.S. attorney and the U.S. attorney's office for the Southern District of New York, who got a civics lesson in how the Constitution works. Because you had the Attorney General of the United States, Pam Bondi, who works for the President of the United States, Donald Trump, have her acting Deputy Attorney General, Emel Bove tell the interim U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York to dismiss without prejudice the bogus corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. And Bove did not tell the U.S. attorney that these charges were bogus. He simply said that this does not fit within the President and the Attorney General's prosecutorial priorities. Because the President and the Attorney General wants to work with the New York City Mayor, Eric Adams, on deporting illegal immigrants the hell out of our country. Right? And the point is this, that that's the President's decision. He is duly elected by the American people. He campaigned on the fact that he's gonna work with these mayors to deport these illegal immigrants. The American voters like what they heard on November 5th. They gave him a broad electoral mandate. 312 electoral votes, all seven swing states and his Senate confirmed. Attorney General is carrying out the President's policy agenda. And to these career bureaucrats in the executive branch, any employee in the executive branch, political or career, they need to understand this, that the President of the United States runs the executive branch, including the Justice Department, including the FBI. And if you don't like the President's policy decisions, too bad, go run for Congress. If you, if you do not follow the President's policy directives and lawful orders, you are obstructing justice. You are, you are in the way. Who the hell did these career bureaucrats in the Southern District of New York? They think it's the sovereign district of New York. Who do they think they are?

[Stephen K. Bannon]

I've said for a long time, you clean up that rat's nest. But I want to go back. Ideas have consequences. Not a better time to talk about this than on President's Day. In the opening of the show, folks, we try to give you the nomenclature, the ideas, and then you'll see how it rolls through and manifests itself in real life. And this is going to be a clash of the titans on this theory. The theory of a unified executive. And now we're getting down to it, because that's where we're going. Supreme Court. Walk me back through. You're saying the Constitution says, and we've had this fight before with Cheney but that was not this fight. This fight's quite different, I think. The unified theory of the executive, by the Constitution, Article 2, he's chief executive officer of the United States government, He's commander in chief of the uniformed military services, and he's the chief magistrate and chief law enforcement officer of the U.S. government. And that is unified in a thing called the office of the President that is held by a guy called the President of these United States. Is that correct, Mike?

[Mike Davis]

Yeah. It's only a theory. To the leftists who don't like the fact that the President of the United States has the executive power under Article 2 of the Constitution.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hold it, hold it, bro. Hold it. Stop. Hold it. Hang on, hang on. It's not a theory. And just with leftists, correct me if I'm wrong, but since Watergate, this is the key point of what you've got. Before Watergate and after Watergate, President Reagan, Bush 41, Bush 43, they all played ball, even part of Trump in the 45. And it was the issue that we should have punched at the time. Has it not since Watergate. And the whole purpose of Watergate was to hive off the Justice Department, hardwired into these House committees and with career, you know, prosecutors and main justice, and have an independent left wing radical legal group that ran the deal and Republicans, including the great Ronald Reagan, comply with this, did it not, sir? So it's not a theory just of leftists. We've essentially. This is my point about controlled opposition. This is my point when I say we got in this situation after Republican, Republican people rang doorbells, gave money, yet all these Republican administrations, we essentially kowtowed to it. Did we not implicitly agree with it? Mike Davis?

[Mike Davis]

I never did. But a lot of the cowards in the fed sock crowd did. And we're seeing those cowards, they're finally speaking up. They didn't speak up. During four years of unprecedented republic ending lawfare against President Trump, his top aide, Steve Bannon, you and Peter Navarro, who went to prison, his supporters on January 6th were persecuted parrots who were targeted by the Biden FBI, Christians who were thrown in prison by the Biden Justice Department. The Fed sock cucks didn't say a word about this for four years. But all of a sudden they're traumatized because some interim career U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York doesn't understand. She works for the Deputy Attorney General who works for the Attorney General who works for the President of the United States who was elected by the American people. These fed sock types Are the string orchestra on the Titanic. They want to look majestic while the ship is going down. And I'll tell you this, the Article 3 project wing of the Republican Party are not going to be the string orchestra. We're not going to look majestic. We're going to be throwing people off the lifeboats.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Okay, hang on, this gets to. This is such a good show today. We're getting down to it, baby. Give me a minute. I'm gonna hold you through the break. Davis, because we haven't even got to the Supreme Court. The Federal Society has done so much good, right? It helped with the judges. It identified on the second tier of judges that we put out. After I took over the campaign, Don McGinna guys said, hey, to convince conservatives to standard stock Republicans, we got to put it at a second list. That second list had guys like Gorsuch on it, et cetera. The Federal Society's done such amazing work for so long. Why now is this kind of a range war between what you call Fed Soc and the Article 3, you know, rebels, Sir.

[Mike Davis]

Well, look at the judges. Look at the judges right now who are, you know, you have A Trump appointed FedSoc judge on the D.C. district Court who pretends that the President of the United States does not have the power to recall USAID Foreign Service officers within 30 days because this Fed sock judge on the D.C. circuit thinks that that's going to be inconvenient for these foreign service officers. Officers. And so, so somehow the President does not have that power and this judge is going to issue a temporary restraining order on President Trump because Judge Carl Nichols doesn't like the fact that President Trump is going to bring these USAID workers home within 30 days. That is unacceptable. These are D.C. cowards.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Hang on one sec. Yeah, hang on, hang one second. Mike Davis, Natalie, on Zuckerberg, we got Poso and Harnwell on Ukraine exploding there, multiple negotiations going on and a big controversy about the Catholic church in the invasion of our nation. All next in the war room.

[Steve Bannon]

We've seen all the headlines. Cyber attacks on our power grids, drones in the sky, violent attacks on everyday Americans. The ugly truth is no leader, no system can protect you from everything. And the last thing I want is to be standing in line depending on help that may never come. And when crisis hits, food is always the first casualty. Everyone needs it and panic buying makes things worse. You remember this from the pandemic? That's why I've made sure my family is prepared with my Patriot supply and their four week emergency food kit. It gives you the nutrition you need to stay strong in a crisis. With 2000 calories per day and 100% of your daily value of 12 essential vitamins and minerals, this kit helps keep you going when every meal matters. Right now they're offering 50 bucks off their four week food kit. Go to my patronsupply.com now to grab yours. Don't put this off. Now is the time. Prepare. That's my Patriotsupply.com to get your four week food kit today. Make sure you're prepared. The crisis is here.

[Mike Davis]

Here's your host, Stephen K. Band.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

We're in conversation with Todd Bensman. Breaking news, Bensman, we're going to try to get him on. I think he's traveling so can't get him by phone this afternoon. Mexican Senate this is just tweet. Mexican Senate commission has approved the entry of members of the U.S. army's 7th Special Forces Group airborne into the country starting this week. So we will find out more about that as Todd is all over this. The commencing of the kinetic war against the, against the cartels, which is a war that we should a kinetic war we should be fighting not associated with anything else. And we'll get to that a little bit later too. PO and then we're going to be up at the top of the hour. So folks, the reason we started today with this is that we give you signal, not noise. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of what is going to transpire over the next couple of days regarding this situation. The unified theory of the executive, as we've told you now for months and months and months over a year, to walk you through the construct of it is about to play out in a live fire exercise to see where it comes down. Mike Davis, tell me about this, Tell me about who the guy is, what the controversy is. And you've said from the beginning, hey, these first line federal judges and I might add for full disclosure, Carl Nichols is the one that sent me to prison on a misdemeanor for four months. Right. A Trump sponsored judge who's been a beauty as Julie Kelly can tell you, probably one of the weakest and worst over there. Talk to me about what's going on. Why is this controversy about the ig and why did Trump and his crack legal team pick this as the one to expedite and get in front, put on the emergency docket and how tough it is even to get something heard.

[Mike Davis]

Sir, let's talk about Hampton Yeats Dellinger. He is Biden's pick to be special Counsel and the U.S. office of Special Counsel. And he is a politician. He ran for Lieutenant Governor of North Carolina. He was the Biden Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Policy. So he helped pick and confirm Biden's radical judges. His father, Walter Dellinger, was Clinton's Solicitor General of the United States. This guy is a pure political operative and he got confirmed on a near party line vote to run this office that's supposed to be this non political office. They handle the Hatch act and personnel, basically they handle the executive branch personnel decisions related to politics, whether it's the Hatch act or retaliatory firings or whatever. Right. This guy is on a five year term, but he reports to the President of the United States just like every other official in the Executive branch. And of course, why would President Trump want this Democrat operative from the Biden administration, this former Democrats Lieutenant gubernatorial candidate, North Carolina, to be his special counsel? He wouldn't. Anyone with a brain would not want that. So President Trump correctly fired this guy. And you have a D.C. judge who has told President Trump that he can't, not only can he not fire this guy, this judge purported to reinstate Dellinger into his job. Right. And so of course, the Trump Justice Department sought an appeal in the D.C. circuit saying, hey, you can't do this. This violates Article 2 of the Constitution. You can't force an employee who's fired back onto the President of the United States. If this Dellinger thinks he was improperly fired, there's other recourse. He can seek monetary damages, for example. But here's the quote from the Trump Justice Department's emergency motion to the Supreme Court yesterday, quotes. This court should not allow lower courts to seize executive power by dictating to the President how long he must continue employing an agency head against his will. And that is exactly right. This is a direct assault on the presidency. This is a direct assault on Article 2 of the Constitution. This is judicial sabotage by these activist judges who think they are the resistance. After the American people elected President Trump in a landslide and the American people elected a Senate majority, and the American people elected a House Republican majority, you have these activist judges who think it's their job to take off their judicial robes and climb into the political arena and throw political punches. And I will tell these politicians in robes, actually without robes now in the political arena that when you throw political punches, expect to get political punches back from the Article 3 project.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Talk to me. So this is, the Trump administration has asked to get this on the emergency docket, tell people what's the emergency docket? How tough is it to get on it or to get picked up by it? And what's the politics of that?

[Mike Davis]

So how it works in the federal system, you bring litigation in the district courts. The district court resolves the matter. It goes up to the court of appeals. They take briefs and motions and hear oral argument. They resolve the matter. This oftentimes takes years. And then the Supreme Court has discretionary review. They don't have to take cases. They take less than 1% of federal appeals on their discretionary docket for merits decisions. But the emergency docket is different. The emergency docket is used when the lower courts are doing something that they are issuing temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions that are clearly unconstitutional that need immediate action by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court also uses the emergency docket for all death penalty cases around the country. And there are other ways they use the emergency docket. The emergency docket is crucial here. And the justices must step up and use the emergency docket because we can't wait weeks, months or years for the President to be able to use his article to power to fire executive branch officials that he doesn't want working for him. To recall Foreign Service officers serving overseas that he doesn't want serving overseas. To have his Treasury Secretary look at treasury payments to root out waste, fraud and abuse. These are critical core Article two powers of the President. He has a. Not only the constitutional responsibility, he has the constitutional duty to make sure to take care that our laws are faithfully executed. And if he thinks that we are spending money from the treasury that's being fraudulently spent, that's. That's being wasted on waste, fraud and abuse. The President has a constitutional Duty under Article 2 to look at those payments. And we have these activist judges telling the President of the United States he can't look at treasury payments. This is why the Supreme Court has to step up immediately. These people who are fired, they have redress. They can get monetary payments. If they were wrong. The President of the United States is losing his article to power Every second these TROs are in place.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Exactly. And the TROs are shutting them down across the nation. What is the probability? Because you know how Roberts is. What's the probability he doesn't want to get involved here. Will it be a fight behind the scenes in the Supreme Court to actually. Because there'll be some guys like Roberts that say, I want to stay out of this fight. Or am I wrong? Is this something that you believe they're going to have to get involved in. And they know that. That they know that they're going to have to get involved. Or is Roberts behind the scenes going to go, I want to stay away from this? Just like he stayed away from the 2020 election, sir.

[Mike Davis]

Well, there are a lot of D.C. judges who have vested interest in what happens in D.C. for example, there is a federal judge right now whose spouse is getting a lot of federal funding or. Excuse me, a lot. Yeah, a lot of federal funding from usaid. That federal judge probably has a conflict of interest. And so I would think that that federal judge would not want to be on one of these cases involving US Aid because I'm gonna expose that judge's ass for this corruption. But I would say this about the Supreme Court. If they do Not Protect Article 2 Powers of the President of the United States, this is gonna be very damaging to the presidency long term. What President Trump is doing here, he's not stealing Congress's legislative powers. He's not stealing the federal judiciary's judicial powers. He is exercising core executive branch powers. For example, looking at waste, fraud and abuse in treasury payments, bringing home foreign service officers in 30 days, there it is firing an executive branch official who he doesn't want working for him. These are core.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

What about, okay, what about, what about impounding? What about saying that, hey, I'm impound the money. I don't think the program's working or it's off track or it's behind or it's been changed. I'm on pound the green new scam to 300 billion and I'm a reprogram it for the wall, sir.

[Mike Davis]

Well, let me just say this about empowerment, that even if you. There's a lot of agreement and disagreement on empowerment depending on what side of the aisle you are. And I would say this to the Supreme Court about impoundments. If the President of the United States, for example, knows that Congress has mistakenly appropriated money to the UN and Gaza and that money is going to fund Hamas terrorist. Does the President of the United States have the power as the chief executive officer and the commander in chief to stop that appropriated money to Hamas? And the answer is hell yes. And if you don't think otherwise, you are creating a very dangerous situation. The president has the power under, under article to take care that our laws are faithfully executed. He is the commander in chief. Giving money from Congress to the UN as a front group in Gaza to Hamas is not only would it be, it would be actually the president would be derelict in his duties if he continued to Fund the UN and Gaza knowing that that money was going to Hamas terrorism.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

What's the call to action? Or is there one? Do you want people just thinking this through be back to them, or is there a call to action today? Because folks, we told you, the courts is where they've always depended upon the Justice Department, these corrupt prosecutors, main justice and the courts. And this is where the main line of battle is going to be because we've got so many issues of impoundment and rescission, they're going to flow from this. What's the call to action today? Mike Davis?

[Mike Davis]

I think the call to action is for people to continue to use the megaphone, use X, use getter, use truth, get out there with opinion pieces. Here's what you need with the Supreme Court and this is unfortunate, but what you need with our weaklings on the Supreme Court is you need two things. You need the law to be right and you need the politics to be right. We saw this with presidential immunity. We got, we got John Sauer to make the beautiful presidential immunity legal arguments. He's going to be President Trump Solicitor General. Now, John Sauer did a masterful job, but that's not enough. Not only do you have to have the law rights with these weaklings on the Supreme Court, you need to have the politics right. And that's why we did the media blitz at the Article 3 project. 4,500 media hits, constant social media, constant opinion pieces. We had to change the politics so these judges could easily follow it again.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Okay, we're gonna do it again. We got a lot to get to the posse. So it's this is part of also force multiplier on Wednesday. Mike Davis, where do people go? Article three, you the app, your article, Grace and Mo pushing out the article. Where do people go to get you on social media and elsewhere, sir.

[Mike Davis]

Article3project.org Article number three project.org you can follow us on social media. You can donate. The most important thing you can do is take action. Our last one we don't want to get confirmed is cash, cash, cash. We think we're going to get him confirmed next Thursday. So light up both of your home state senators.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Yeah. Okay, brother.

[Mike Davis]

Appreciate. Thank you, sir.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Thanks. Okay, I'll break that down for you. That's the law. Right is Mike Davis's responsibility. The politics.

[Mike Davis]

Right.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Is your responsibility. We got to create a firestorm. You got to get their attention is what he's saying. Short break. Back in the morning.

[Steve Bannon]

Drew risk high that an IRS agent is about to show up at your home over unpaid taxes or unfiled returns or that the IRS is about to freeze your bank accounts. Look, understanding your IRS risk level helps you decide how quickly you need to act. Take my advice and find out. Call the experts at Tax Network USA and share your situation. They'll advise if they believe your risk level is high, moderate or low. This is a free service for my audience at the War room and it's 100% confidential. And if your risk is high and you want to resolve your IRS problems, Tax Network USA will do it. Nobody knows the IRS better. In fact, TeX Network USA has a preferred direct line, so they know which agents to deal with and which ones to avoid. And baby, this is critical. They've resolved over $1 billion in tax debt. So whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million, their genius strategies are designed to quickly settle your tax problems. Discovering your current IRS risk is fast, free and confidential, and it's a smart first step in solving your tax problems. Don't make the call the IRS until you talk to the Tax Network people. This is absolutely critical. Call Tax Network USA at 1-800-958-1000. That's 1-800-958-10000 or visit taxnetworkusa.com Bannon Remember the number 1-800-958- 1000.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Do it today.

[Mike Davis]

Your host, Stephen K. Ban.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Okay, ideas have consequences. You guys more than anybody know this one big idea is modern monetary theory. This morning I was going to do the whole first hour just on the budget cuts and the phoniness of what we're seeing and all that. And of course you got to be called to the ramparts because we got action, action, action in the courts. Make sure you go to birchgold.com Bannon the end of the Dollar Empire. The six free installment is a modern monetary theory. Make sure you understand it. We have a big announcement coming out on Wednesday with Birch Goal something we're doing to get you more knowledge and information about what's going on in capital markets to make sure you can understand what is happening now and project it forward. What may happen. Trying to get Philip actually for the, for the, for the force multiplier at least getting in by video. You can also go to Bannon B A N N o N at 989-898 and get the free brochure investing in Gold in the era of Trump and the Age of Trump. Make sure you check that out. They're great at putting up information working with us. This is one of the reasons such a Great partnership. There's a bunch of. A bunch of things happened about gold, about gold being delivered late at the City of London bank of England, about gold shipping back here, about the. The audit of gold. I'm going to get Philip Patrick, I think tonight and go through all of that to answer all your questions. A lot going on also. I want to go back, make sure you write this down. The law has to be right and the politics have to be right. Now, the law being right, we have nothing to do with. You're not lawyers, most of you, thank God. And we're particularly not constitutional lawyers. But we talk to the best and the smartest. I want to go back. Mike referenced back to immunity, which eventually was nine to nothing and melted down the left. And we started with a long shot. Remember that was dismissed for the first couple of months. It was on msnbc. They dismiss it. It's a crackpot theory. It's ridiculous. The court won't even take it up. These guys are screwballs. They're trying to find something for Trump when he says get the politics right articles. And this is what being a force multipliers on social media and among your own circle forcing the issue. Put it up so they can't. They can't look away from it. That's the exact same thing that has to happen here because the court's going to be in particular the Supreme Court. And I've said from the beginning, you're going to have to make some decisions here on the unified theory of the executive. So they're saying it's a constitutional crisis. I'm. My point is not a constitutional crisis. Just got to set some things right. Oh, it's a constitutional crisis. Firing these things? No, it's quite well thought through, but it's got to be seen through to its logical conclusion. How do we do that? We get it adjudicated. Remember in 2020, folks, the agony you felt that we couldn't get a rightful hearing. Well, this is the same. Let's start with these articles we're going to be putting up with Grayson people in the chat rooms and up on the show to make sure you. You get we're on top of this. That we're on top of this. That's why we need you at the Ramparts Home title lock. I can't have you all sudden somebody take out a second on your house and you're saying, hey, I owe 50,000 bucks. I can't watch War Room. I can't go to the ramparts. Hometitlelock.com Steve25, you got the triple lock, million dollar guarantee. One 24 hour coverage, two in the middle of the night, something's happening, Boom, you get an urgent alert and then they've got specialists, a restoration team. If all else fails, a restoration team to make sure your title gets restored to you so that you own your real asset up to a million bucks. Go check it out today. Natalie Dominguez and the team are there. Hometitleoc.com, steve, 25, go into detail, talk to him, find out if it's right for you. Check it out today. So, Natalie Winters, a firestorm over the Tell me about Zuckerberg and your exposure to Zuckerberg and his counter efforts, efforts to cover his tracks, ma'am.

[F]

Well, look, a snake can shed its skin and it's still a snake. So let this story be frankly, a testament to, I think, the ascendant MAGA movement. They tried the first time, what to sabotage and sort of subversively infiltrate our movement. Now they know they have to be supplicants and try to pretend to be maga. Mark Zuckerberg, probably the greatest defender in all that. People may recall. Last week we talked about how the New York Times came after a Twitter thread that I did showing how Mark Zuckerberg had been funneling money to groups that are tough, tied to all the lawfares, the lawsuits that you've been talking about, particularly an organization called Protect Democracy. But the story gets even darker. You know, we like to bring the receipts here in the war room, as we always say. Well, after I broke that story, that thread, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative actually went back to their website, which used to list over 5,000 grants that they've doled out to overwhelmingly far left organizations. But that's besides the point, at least for the second. But what's so interesting is that after I put that thread out, they actually reversed their website and now they only list 680 grants, saying that they're only doing post 2024 grants. Conveniently, everything they did to rig the 2020 election is now gone. But I also want to push back on this idea that Mark Zuckerberg could have never funded a group that's tied to ongoing and active Trump resistance, because I actually donor advised funds aside the Silicon Valley Community foundation, aside Forward Us, which was founded by Mark Zuckerberg in 2013, in addition to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, I've actually identified over a dozen organizations that have been funded by them that are actively involved in some form of resistance against President Trump. Whether that be lawsuits, lobbying, protests, mass demonstration, phone banking, phone calls, you name it. Just to give you some examples, one of the group, it's called casa, is actively suing President Trump over his birthright citizenship executive order. They also maintain a hotline where people can dox ICE raids and ICE agents make the road. New York has a whole deportation defense manual. They instruct legal aliens how to avoid deportation, and they're suing President Trump over his deportation agenda. Vote Vets Action has received money from Zuckerberg. They actively oppose the Hegseth confirmation. They're having all their deranged followers pile in with lawsuits, petitions, you name it. You have this center for American Progress, the sort of hotbed of Obama administration alliance that are putting out petition after petition, lawsuit after lawsuit. They're also part of that Democracy Forward coalition, which is sort of the tip of the spear of all of the lawsuits against President Trump. And there's some really, really extremely radical open borders advocacy groups like the Black alliance for Just Immigration, which smeared, believe it or not, the Lake and Riley act as racist in a pipeline to mass detention and deportation. And my, my favorite Common Justice, a far left group is actively tweeting as we speak about how they're going to resist Trump and nothing will make them back down. So, Mark Zuckerberg, I know you're so focused on criminal justice. Yes, go ahead.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Yeah, hang on, hang on, hang on. I want to hold you through the break. We're going to get to Ukraine, we're going to get to the Catholic Church in McCarrick. This demon huge expose on that. Liz, yours is going to join us. Ben Harnwell, we got poso, but I gotta hold over our White House correspondent. This is a massive story because it tells you exactly how the infiltration is going to work. Short commercial break. Back in 90 seconds. In a moment.

[Steve Bannon]

You wish you could have invested in the stock market last year when investors scored the highest profits in decades. But between that mountain of bills and credit card debt, you had nothing, and I mean nothing left over. It's time to stop letting debt hold you back. Let me tell you how done with debt can help. They have a brilliant new strategy designed to tackle your debt and put cash back into your hands so you can save and invest and build the life you've been wanting. Done with debt goes head to head with credit card and loan companies. Their team of negotiators and legal experts work to significantly reduce your bills, eliminate interest and erase penalties. This frees up cash to invest while the stock market is still hot. The bottom line is this done with debt? Helps turn crushing debt into financial freedom. That's crushing debt into financial freedom. But some of their strategies are time sensitive, so don't wait. Start building the life you deserve. Visit donewithdet.com and talk with one of their strategists.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

It's free.

[Steve Bannon]

Go to donewithdebt.com that's donewithdebt.com CurdHuman really.

[Mike Davis]

Trying to fill this gap of quality supplements and of course, the beef liver being our flagship product. For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc. And because it is 100% grass fed and natural, your body is able to.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Absorb these nutrients far better than taking.

[Mike Davis]

Any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general. So we have some other amazing products.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

But if you'd like to check us.

[Mike Davis]

Out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com and.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Cheers to your health.

[Steve Bannon]

700,000Americans every year. Yes, heart disease is the number one killer every year, year in and year out. Heart disease builds over time. Hypertension, high blood pressure, bad cholesterol, diabetes, all of it affects our heart. A healthy heart is key to being energetic as we get older. It is never too early to take.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Care of your heart.

[Steve Bannon]

Heart. You see, heart disease sneaks up on us. You can start in your 30s and when this happens, you're at serious works by the time you turn 60. If you want to take care of your heart and those you care about, please go to war roomhealth.com that's war room health.com all one word war roomhealth.com use the code war room at checkout to save 67% of your first shipment. That's code war room at checkout to save sixty seven percent and do it again. War room health all one word war roomhealth.Com go there today. You need if you're going to be part of the posse, you need a strong heart. You need a lion's heart. How we're going to do that is with salty. Go there, do it today.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Check it out.