
Episode 4470: Day 2 Of The Conclave; Trump Bridges Monumental Trade Deal With UK ...
Loading summary
Vatican Analyst
Yet selected a new Pope. The second vote of the day just wrapped up just before the show started, with black smoke rising from the top of the Sistine Chapel. The ballots are only burned after two rounds of voting unless a selection is made. Yesterday we also saw black smoke rise above the Sistine Chapel. If we see white. If we see white smoke, it signifies there is a new leader of the Catholic Church. A 2/3 majority needs needs to be reached in order for that to happen. Two more votes will be held today. Out of the more 250 cardinals in Vatican City, only 133 are eligible to vote. Under those the age of 80 can cast.
Stephen K. Bannon
About your sense of how you believe.
Conservative Commentator
The Church may go after Pope Francis in terms of its choice of a new pontiff.
Religious Expert
Well, right, that's the big question in terms of the electoral process. Things are kind of going as you'd expect. We'd be very surprised if there was white smoke smoke either last night or today, now, possibly the end of today. Pope Francis was elected on that fifth ballot. My guess is tomorrow. I think it might be a little more divided conclave. We heard during the General Congregations, those discussions before the Conclave, that there were disagreements about the direction of the Church. Some wanted to go, you know, very much with the Francis momentum. Others felt this was problematic. One of the difficulties in talking about the Church is we tend to look at it through our Western lens. And so we have certain preoccupations usually around questions of sexual morality. But go to Africa, for instance, where the church is burgeoning, but also under great persecution, go to the church in Asia and you see the interreligious dialogue is of huge importance. So they're considering all these different dimensions of the Church's life. And there's something, you know, happening inside the walls of that Sistine Chapel right now. And we'll see. My sense is it might be a little more divided than it was last time. Also, I'd speak politically last time. The more liberal faction was better organized this time. I know the conservatives were better organized going into the conclave. That could lead to a little more of a deadlock.
Social Issues Advocate
They focus on one small set of issues. And you were talking about sexual morality, sexual issues, whether it's abortion, whether it's same sex marriage. But for most of the world, especially in this, we keep talking of the south, they talk about that. But you're right, the focus is on religious persecution. It's on those Matthew 25 issues where Jesus talks about feeding the poor, clothing the naked, bringing hope to the hopeless. Underline that fact for us and explain to Americans that are watching right now, this isn't just about what somebody's position on abortion is going to be or on same sex marriage.
Stephen K. Bannon
Right.
Religious Expert
And that's the beautiful part of the Francis papacy, I think they all want to carry forward. He wanted a church that turned with a merciful face toward the world, that was the friend of the marginalized, the friend of the poor and the forgotten. And I think that's the great legacy of Pope Francis. As far as I'm concerned. They all want that to continue. It's in regard to some other issues that I think they will find greater division. But, you know, conclaves often involve, you know, taking what they consider the best of the previous papacy and then maybe trying to correct difficulties in the previous papacy. And it's a playing out of those issues. There's also the question of the personalities involved. So one thing is the position the cardinal holds. The other one is the cardinal himself. What kind of person is he? Even his age, even his health, even your personal interactions with him? Often at the general congregations, the cardinal will say, that guy gave a speech. Or I just sensed something in him that I thought was, you know, worthy of a pope. So all those factors are at play, as in any political reality. And this one, on a very small scale, you got 133 electors and they're weighing all these different elements.
Conservative Commentator
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. Reasons. I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. The people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen.
Stephen K. Bannon
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA Media I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.
Conservative Commentator
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.
Stephen K. Bannon
War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of War Room. Stephen K. Bannon out on assignment yet. Jack Bosobic here covering down live from Rome, Italy. We are just steps away from the Vatican itself, where the world awaits the selection election of the next Pope. Today is May 8, 2025, year of our Lord. And yet the news goes on. So earlier today, we just saw the second of the votes that came in so third votes overall, black smoke, puff of black smoke from the Sistine Chapel, that ceremonial chimney that's put above a lot of talk about what is going to come out later. Possibly a pope today, possibly a pope tomorrow. And we have Catholics for Catholics. We're really thanking them for sponsoring my portion of this trip out here. John. Yep. We're hoping to get him on possibly in the second hour. But what people need to understand is that we are hoping and praying, number one, that the Holy Spirit, of course, goes into that conclave, but also that the conservatives, that Cardinal Burke, that so many others hold the line. And we're praying and calling for all of the conservative cardinals to hold the line. We know they've held the line thus far because Cardinal Parallelin and some of the other progressives have not been able to get in on three ballots now. So that means for three ballots, they have held the line. Now we're going to continue monitoring this chimney, the most watched chimney in the world, because at in about 30 minutes, the Cardinals will return to the Sistine Chapel, the Sistine Chapel itself. Got to talk to the guys over at Silence. Maybe they had, maybe they worked with them, I don't know. But they have turned the entire Sistine Chapel into a Faraday cage. And they're doing so in order to keep all signals going from going in or coming out so that no influence from outside also. No, no eavesdropping, no subversion, nothing else will be able to get in. Of course. The news of the day continues. President Trump very soon will be speaking from the White House and we'll cut to that directly when he does huge trade deal with the UK Also, I've got to show this just ridiculous clip from earlier today because there wasn't just black smoke coming out across the Vatican. I was, I was looking across the rooftops at one point and I said, is that some pink smoke coming up? Is that pink smoke? Let's play the clip, the clip and see what happened.
Conservative Commentator
Smoke out sexism. A woman's place is in the conclave.
Stephen K. Bannon
Smoke out sexism.
Feminist Activist
We are doing this because we know we have got a little window of time before the cardinals are sequestered inside that Sistine Chapel with no access to their social media and their phones, that they will see the pink smoke over the Vashkin and they will know that women are sending a clear signal that they cannot go in with 133 men deciding the future of the Catholic Church without half of that Catholic Church. They are going to talk about all sorts of issues they will not talk about the ordination of women and priests. Women priests and the equality of women.
Conservative Commentator
I'm gonna let it shine.
Stephen K. Bannon
Let it shine, Let it shine, Let it shine. Absolutely ridiculous. Well, as my. As my brother Kevin actually tweeted earlier today, sorry, ladies, as it turns out, Vatican City is a place where women don't vote. And this is ridiculous. What you're seeing is the influence of the progressives. They're trying as hard as they can. Look, these are the people that want to change the church. They are the people that want to come in and say, oh, Christianity should be more open. Christianity should be more inclusive. We want to be more touchy feely. We want to go out and be more worldly. No, absolutely not. We need to embrace tradition. We need to have more of the traditions of the church, the traditions of the early Christians, the traditions of the faith. The. That is the faith upon which all is built. That is the rock upon which, of course, St. Peter's Basilica, right there the church was built. The keys handed over by Christ to his royal stewards, the apostles, to maintain the church until the return of the King. And now the next successor of St Peter. Perhaps in just a couple of moments, perhaps just in a couple of hours, we'll see that white smoke. And of course, what happens immediately after that? The new Pope will come out from the balcony. And of course, we're monitoring it as much as possible when we look to this election of a new Pope and people say, well, what if I'm not Catholic? Who cares? And I had an interview with Charlie Kirk yesterday, and he's evangelical. So he was saying, what is it? And I pointed it this way, 1.5 billion Catholics in the world, and then essentially also a major world leader and major figure in his own right. That's who the Pope is. Historically, the Pope has been a benchmark for all of Western civilization. And the question is, where do we want Western civilization to go? Do we want another globalist? Do we want another globalist leader pushing these ideas of no borders, of no barriers, of no nations? We're all going to mix together. We're going to have this globalist state like, like Klaus Schwab, the former Klaus Schwab wanted Soros's. That was Soros's open society vision. That's why they're against borders. That's why they're against the wall. That's why they said refugees everywhere, the migration, settlement. That's what was being pushed. And you saw that being pushed from the Vatican itself. That's what needs to Change. Not to mention what have I always said here on War Room and on my own show, Human Events Daily. The issue, of course, is the elite merger, not elite capture, elite merger of the, of the west and the corrupt Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party, which signed a deal, signed a blood deal with the previous pontificate. And by the way, that deal was worked on by three people. Pope Francis, former cardinal, Cardinal McCarrick. He went down over crimes with kids. And who was the third in on that? Cardinal Parolin. Cardinal Parolin, who is currently the progressive's number one man for the papacy. He's the one that they're pushing as hard as possible. Well, as it turns out, these were the three guys that were working on that deal with the Chinese Communist Party. Complete sellout and betrayal of the Catholics and Christians all across China, the underground Christian churches, cardinals, and everyone who's working so hard to spread the word of God and spread scripture throughout the Chinese mainland so that people there can know the truth about God. I remember, I remember when I was living in China and I would go to Easter services or I wanted to go to church, you had to show a passport to prove that I wasn't a Chinese citizen so that I could go to church. Why? Because they might be saying things in there that are unapproved by the party leadership. Well, you know what, folks? That's not what we're going to be doing around here. We're going to be doing lots of things and saying lots of things and spreading lots of truth. That's not exactly approved by party leadership because that's what we do here on the war room. And so we pray, we praying here. And of course, we are putting and exerting whatever influence we can from our position here, from, from having our voice and from even going down there. Kevin Posobic is right now on his way to St. Peter Square. We're going to get him up in a minute. We know President Trump's speech will be imminent, but we're going to have people there and interview. Because when you talk to Gen Z, when you talk to the youth right now, the faithful youth, they don't want this namby pamby, shallow, substanceless faith. They want the real thing. They want the orthodoxy, they want the tradition, they want the veils, they want all of it. And they want to be able to do so knowing that the head of the church is backing. Then remind everyone, Birch Gold, right before we go to the break, go out, support the war room. So Steve always says, support the sponsors. Head out to birchgold.com bannon or you just text Bannon9898. You're going to get your ultimate guide for gold in the Trump era. And of course, course, as we talk about the changes in world leaders, the tumultuous times, turbulent times, you want to be able to have that beacon. So go text Burke. Text Bannon 989898 Birch Gold we will be back very very soon. We're here live at the Vatican in Rome, Italy. Jack Posobic double duty. Stephen K. Bannon out on assignment. I'm here live doing my show Human Events Daily and right now covering down on the War Room. Let's send it out Vatican City. We're praying that Christ himself through the Holy Spirit will be present. You went and lost your pride. But I'm American made. I got American power, I got American.
Natalie Winters
Babe.
Stephen K. Bannon
In America's heart.
Conservative Commentator
This July there is a global summit of BRICS nations. In Rio de Janeiro, the block of emerging superpowers including China, Russia, India and Persia are meeting with the goal of displacing the United States dollar as the global currency. They're calling this the Rio Reset. As BRICS nations push forward with their plans, global demand for US dollars will decrease, bringing down the value of the dollar in your savings. While this transition won't not happen overnight, but trust me, it's going to start in Rio. The real reset in July marks a pivotal moment when BRICS objectives move decisively from a theoretical possibility towards inevitable reality. Learn if diversify your savings into gold is right for you. Birch Gold Group can help you move your hard earned savings into a tax sheltered IRA and precious metals. Claim your free info kit on gold by texting my name Bannon. That's B A N N O N to 989-898 with an A plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers led Birch Gold army with a free no obligation info kit on owning gold before July and the Rio reset text Bannon ba n o n 298-9898 do it today. That's the Rio reset text Bannon at 989-8898 and do it today.
Political Analyst
Judges and the judiciary is a co equal branch of government separate from the others with the authority to interpret the Constitution as law and strike down obviously acts of Congress or acts of the President and that innovation doesn't work if it's not. The judiciary is not independent. Its job is to obviously decide cases but in the course of that check the excesses of Congress or of the executive and that does require degree of independence. What do you think of these calls for impeachment of judges based on the decisions that they've made? Well, I've already spoken to that. And, you know, impeachment is not how you register disagreement with decision. That's what you're for, right? That's what. That's what you're there for. That's what we're there for. Yeah. What do you think of these calls for impeachment of judges based on the decisions that they've made? Well, I've already spoken to that. And, you know, impeachment is not how you register disagreement with decisions. That's what you're for, right? That's what. That's what you're there for. That's what we're there for.
Natalie Winters
Yeah.
Conservative Commentator
10 minutes until next break.
Stephen K. Bannon
Till you go. All right, folks, Jack Posobic, here we are back live in Rome, Italy. We're at the Vatican waiting to see whether white or black smoke will appear from the top of the Sistine Chapel, the ceremonial chimney which has been erected. But, folks, I watched this interview with Chief Justice John Roberts, and my blood started boiling. I immediately started firing off texts to the viceroy. Mike Davis, do you hear John Roberts up there? Now, this guy doesn't usually give interviews. So when the Chief justice gives an interview like that and sits down and speaks candidly like this, which is something that you've never done, that you know he's going to say something serious, and you know he's going to say something that he wants to get out there. And what are the things that he's saying? First of all, he comes out and says that we shouldn't be impeaching judges for disagreements. No, John Roberts. Chief Justice Roberts, we're not impeaching judges or talking about impeaching judges for disagreements. It's for dereliction of duty. It's for failure to perform. Your job is not to play games with the law and the Constitution. Your job is to implement them. Your job is to make sure that the laws are followed faithfully and. And that the laws are in line with the Constitution, which perhaps might even be something that's up for discussion. It is not your job to sit there and say, oh, well, it's a disagreement. No, it's not a disagreement. It's not that we lost a case. It's because you are not following the law because you won't do your job. And we've seen this from Judge Boasberg to so many others out there that they are simply not willing to stand up with this. Now, when it comes down to the next piece of it, he says, what is the role of judiciary? The role of the judiciary is to. And I just want to say this, this is exactly what he said. I'm going to read it word for word. To check the excesses of Congress or the executive, to check the excesses of Congress or this. Notice, John Roberts never said anything about the excesses of Congress or the executive during the time when Joe Biden's regime, the illegitimate regime of Joe Biden was, was in office, when they were locking up patriots, when they were locking up pro lifers, many cases, the J6ers being held without even a trial. But that wasn't in excess. That wasn't a problem at all. So many unconstitutional acts by that administration, yet he didn't have a problem. He didn't come out and speak. John Roberts, you are up there making policy decisions. You are making policy statements. This, you're giving your opinion on policy and politics. Let me tell you something. If you want to weigh in on that, if you want to legislate, if you want to be the executive, John Roberts, then why don't you be a man and step up and run for office? Why don't you be a man and put your name on the ballot? Come on, 2028's coming up. Or maybe there's a Senate seat, maybe there's a House seat you want to go for. Why don't you have at it, throw your hat in the ring. But if you're going to be a judge, be a judge. Don't sit there and say that you get to determine what are the excesses of Congress or the executive or the President. We know what this is about. And I don't think for a second that I've forgotten, by the way, John Roberts, that you were the one who screwed up President Trump's inaugural address. When the inaugural oath of office, when you rushed the oath and that's what you didn't wait for First Lady Melania Trump to come up there with the Bible so he could have it, have his hand on it. You were fine when it was J.D. vance, totally fine for that. No, you did it on purpose. It was deceitful. It was deliberate. We know you did this on purpose. And now we can all see your bias completely worn on your sleeve. I guess justice in quite as blind as she used to be, is she, John? Not quite as blind as she used to be. This is ridiculous. And look, when we talk about bad justice is out there, folks. This is what we're talking about. Oh, the excesses. This is the same mentality, by the way, that Washington, D.C. had when President Trump was in office the first time. Only where did you hear it? Not direct, not from the Supreme Court, of course. They were obviously saying this behind closed doors. No, you would hear it from the chief of staff. When John Kelly was the chief of staff. You would hear it from Mad Dog Mattis. Remember Mad Dog Mattis? He was such a. Mad as a dog.
Conservative Commentator
Yeah.
Stephen K. Bannon
You would hear it from all of these. H.R. mcMaster. And they were having, they would have daily calls every morning. How are we going to defend the country from Trump, defend the republic from Trump as they were working to subvert him day in and day out. We know about the subversion. We know about all of it. No, no, it's ridiculous. It is a joke and it is a big, big problem because they believe that, that they are the ones who are in control of the country. They believe that. It's their decision. And when I got into it with Jamie Raskin a couple weeks ago, I guess last week now he said, we're the voice of the people. We are the voice of the people. We are the representatives of the people. No, Jamie Raskin, you're not the voice of the people because the people didn't vote for you. The popular vote and seven out of seven of the swing states, including the the Electoral College, was won by Donald J. Trump. Donald Trump is the voice of the people because he's who they voted for. Do you understand that? Once you get that through your little skull, Jamie Raskin, okay, he's the one who's the voice of the people. Not this, not this idea of you and your union thugs. I don't care how many union thugs you want to send out, by the way, Jamie Raskin, send them all. Send every single one. And so I don't want to hear it. I don't want to hear it at all. The excesses, John Roberts wants to say, the excesses of the executive in Congress. We know what this is about. This is the full court press now on Trump's agenda. And notice he doesn't say anything, by the way, because they've overturned a number of these lower court rulings. They've overturned them. So if you're going to overturn the lower court rulings, wouldn't you say it's the excesses of your own judiciary, John Roberts, Wouldn't you say that's the excesses? Wouldn't you say that's the problem? Wouldn't you say that's what they want you to focus on. Couldn't you come out and say, well, you know, there's been some issues with these judges. They're legislating from the bench. They're becoming activist judges. They're the ones who are putting it. No, no, it's not that at all. You're not saying it. What you're doing is you're putting your own bias first. That's why we're seeing these decisions where Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, acb, are siding with the liberals. We know what this is about. This is because you don't want the people's agenda, the MAGA agenda, President Trump's agenda, to go through. And so you'll sit there. No, I get it. You'll color within the lines. You'll vote when you have to. But deep down, that's what John Roberts is telling you, folks. He's telling you that even after all of this, what does he care more about? His own legacy? He cares about his Wikipedia page more than he cares about doing his job. He cares about what. What the Atlantic talks about him, says about him. Oh, the Atlantic, by the way, gotta love the Atlantic, where they're running headlines now talking about the. The threat of the woke Right or the woke right. They come up with these terms every couple of years. Remember, it was what was Ultra Maga and the woke. Right. And all the rest of this because they can't quite figure out a way or a new pejorative. So the new pejorative just dropped. New label just dropped. We got to attack the far right. The woke. Right, the maga, Ultra Maga. It's nonsense. It's Americans who love their country who decided to stand up and say, this is our home, this is our nation. These are our families, these are our children. We're going to live for them. And we don't care about your establishment parlor games anymore. We don't care what names you call us from the swamp. You've already called us. Certainly for me, you've called me every name that you could think of already. So what do you think I'm going to do? You think I'm going to sit there and say, oh, my gosh, no, another label. Oh, no. Oh, go darn. But you know what I will do? I'm not going to sit there and cry about your little labels. What I'm going to do is I'm going to take that energy and use it to win. And then I'm going to win some more. And then I'm going to keep delivering wins for President Donald J. Trump. And he is going to roll over every single one of you. So say what you want about his Wikipedia page. I don't care about Wikipedia pages as much as you do. I don't care about whatever, whatever ink the scribblers over at the Atlantic are wanting to write because at the end of the day, they will be gone. They will be absolutely gone. And as we're here in Rome, we are thinking about the eternal. We are thinking about the transcendent. This is why, by the way, believers and Christians and anyone who has that firm, deeply rooted belief in God as their creator is such a threat to their program, such a threat to their agenda. Why? Because we don't care what you say about us. We will be judged once by our heavenly Father and that is the only judgment that we are worried about. So we don't care what the New York Times says. We don't care what the Atlantic says, New York magazine or all the rest. Although I believe Ben Harmwell is doing a sit down with New York magazine right now. And as I said, New York magazine. Those guys, those guys are out there, man. They are. They are not some guys you want to hang out with. But whatever, folks, we are awaiting President Trump. He is going to be speaking imminently trade deal with the UK representatives of the UK the British invasion is here in Washington, D.C. well, I am here in Rome, Italy, covering down on the conclave. So we're going to be watching for that white smoke, that pearly white smoke. Just a few minutes, the Cardinals will begin voting again. It is currently 10:30, 30 Eastern time, but it is 4:30pm here in Rome, Italy. Jack Posobic guest hosting War Room will be right back with break.
Conservative Commentator
What if he had the brightest mind in the War Room delivering critical financial research every month? Steve Bannon here. War Room listeners know Jim Rickards. I love this guy. He's our wise man. A former CIA, Pentagon and White House advisor with an unmatched grasp of geopolitics and capital markets, Jim predicted Trump's Electoral College victory exactly 312 to 226, down to the actual number itself. Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11, a moment that could define Trump's presidency in your financial future. His latest book, Money GPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos. Bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm driven crashes and even threats to national security. Right now, War Room members get a free copy of MoneyGPT when they sign up for strategic intelligence. This is Jim's flagship Financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence. I read it. You should read it. Time is running out. Go to rickardswarroom.com that's all one word. Rickards war Room. Rickards with an S. Go now and claim your free book. That's rickardswarroom.com do it.
Economic Commentator
Today President Trump has set off what could end up becoming a full blown trade war. As we go down this path, it's worth keeping something firmly in view. Tariffs don't work. I'm not spouting free market theory. I'm simply making a practical observation. There have been many efforts in recent decades to help industries in decline in America. I can think of no case where tariffs have worked to reverse that decline, except temporarily. Take the most recent example before Trump. Tariffs on tires put in place by President Obama in 2009 after complaints from American companies about cheap Chinese imports, the Obama administration slapped a 35% tariff on Chinese tires.
Natalie Winters
Shall we call them tariff downers? Because as you know, we are awaiting a historic press conference coming from President Trump believed to be with the United Kingdom. And of course, Chinese negotiations are forthcoming too. It's Natalie Winters. Jack Bosobic I think is adjusting part of his set, but we'll have him back. I think we got some people over at the White House too, that we may go to. I guess the White House is running a little behind schedule, though. I guess we'll give him a little bit of grace when you're upending the entire global trade order. But I want to pick up on something that Pesopic was mentioning before we get into, I think, just how historic today is. And there's some interesting, shall we say, voter fraud investigations, accusations, actually in this case, indictments. You know, here in the war room, we speak in prison sentences and not strongly worded letters, those coming out of Texas. We'll get into all of that and how the New York Times is, I guess predictably running cover, trying to make you feel bad for ballot harvesters and people who tried to rig elections. But I want to bring your attention. I think this all really, frankly merges and meshes quite nicely with the tariffs, the trade imbalance, reorientation, restructuring that President Trump has undertaken. That individual by the name of Cardinal Theodore McCarrick that Jack Posobic had mentioned, who was essentially the envoy, the lead negotiator for a lot of these Vatican and China negotiations. Well, he's a quite interesting character because if you can believe it, he actually has deep ties to none other than Hunter Biden. I had broken the story years ago, but McCarrick had actually spoke at several events hosted by CEFC China Energy, you may recall, that is the Chinese Communist Party paramilitary influence organization that's chaired by a man by the name of Patrick Ho, who boasted about being the effing spy chief of China. Now, I know we're called China Hawks here in the war room, but I think even Democrats would agree that maybe that rises just marginally to a national security threat status. Nonetheless, like I said, the lead negotiator on this China Vatican deal was McCarrick, who repeatedly spoke at these CEFC events where Hunter Biden was listed as the managing director, including, but not limited to one of their events in 2012, the New York Forum on World Civilizations, and in 2013, Core Values and World Order. But it gets even worse. And why am I bringing this up? Because I think there's a striking, if not deafening parallel to so many of the trade deals that we've seen go on between this country and the PRC and the common thread, the common variable there being that every person who was involved in negotiating them. Though I don't even like the term negotiating, because that implies that you had a seat at the table, you never did. And now the people who are apoplectic over what President Trump is doing to rebalance these trade deficits, the actual abuses and abusive relationship that the ccp, but of course, all their proxies, the belt and road made in China 2025, take your pick. But the way that they've been able to score these deals, I think there's a very interesting microcosm and sort of representation of what happened in this one China Vatican deal with our trade deals more broadly. And it's so interesting because McCarrick, I guess he just loved the PRC so much that he actually wrote several articles for their quarterly journal that they would publish, talking and praising, like I said, the spy chief of China, Patrick Ho, quote, I do not have the brilliance or the learning to match Patrick. He even calls him brilliant again. I guess he really thinks a Chinese Communist Party spy is brilliant. That should tell you all you need to know. He goes on to actually draw parallels between Catch this Xi Jinping and the Pope, many paragraphs about how they're so similar in saving the world before I guess his final act in this one article, talking about how there are connections that exist between doctrines of Catholics and the Communist doctrine. Now, I don't know about you. I've been around long enough to know what Chinese Communist Party not just compromise, but merger looks like. And this is a telltale sign yet again, Another called shot for the war room. Though, like I always say, and I'm sure you share my feelings in this, we don't necessarily want to be right, right. I wish COVID 19 weren't a bio weapon launched by the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but unfortunately that's with the evidence. Despite the CCP's best efforts to stonewall every single ounce of all of that gain of function research aside, that's obviously where it came from. But yet another called shot, which I think dovetails quite nicely with this whole idea that President Trump, the MAGA movement, Trumpism as an ideology has been right from day one. There's an article from the New York Times today, let's toss it up. About a Ken Paxton indictment, alleged investigation, people may recall, what was it a few months ago, the LULAC organizers, of course, the New York Times was melting down because I guess they were in their, their 80s. I would like to introduce them to all the dead Democratic voters then I guess on their voter rolls. But it's quite interesting. If you read this article, I'll read you a paragraph of it and you tell me who you think they think the victim is. Now five people, all with ties to Democratic candidates, are accused of illegal vote harvesting, which usually involves knocking on doors and asking if volunteers can deliver completed absentee or mail in ballots to voting centers or ballot drop boxes. The piece goes on. I don't think they have even one paragraph sentence or a positive phrase mentioning that voter fraud is real, that the people who were indicted were caught harvesting ballots illegally. Right. They demean and paint Ken Paxton as an absolute lunatic. Well, I think my critique, honestly, something we've been hammering for these past few days, it would go all the way back to people like Senator Tillis. Right. They can talk so tough, so tough, so much so that they can't vote to confirm Ed Martin because of what? The debatable nuance between a three day prison sentence or a three year prison sentence over some January 6th, I guess, violent offenders who entered a building where the door was open for them. Do you ever hear these people talk that tough about, I don't know, Zelensky, I mean, he canceled elections, came after Christianity and imposed martial law. You never really hear that. Do you ever really hear these people actually do anything tough against the Chinese Communist Party? No. The only time they'll talk tough on them is so they can justify a trillion dollar defense budget that seems to only be expanding every single year. Oh, but you say you want to delist them from the stock market oh, no, no, no, that's the, what, fourth, fifth, sixth rail? Can't go there. Well, I would say yet another called shot for the war room. So much so I believe we're talking about this. Last night at about 6:30pm there's been an absolutely massive bombshell expose coming out of Stanford, which of course is home to the Hoover Institution, one of the leading conservative think tanks. But I'd also just flag before we get into the CCP espionage that's been going down there, remember someone by the name of Pamela Carlin? Well, she was, I think the Dean or some very high up position at Stanford Law, then became Biden's doj kind of head honcho apparatchik, saying that if you dare to question the results of the election that you would probably have the full force of Biden's DOJ hurled against you and you could potentially end up in jail. Wonder what she had to hide with that one. We'll get into that, I guess, another time. But this investigation shows not just run of the mill Chinese infiltration on the Stanford campus, but so much so that they have actually been using people who aren't even students and having them act as spies and leveraging their families overseas in China, trying to get them, trying to convince them to leak secrets about highly classified, in some cases military applicable research and bring it back to the homeland, to the motherland. So for all these people who want to talk so tough on the Chinese Communist Party, I would suggest that maybe you start with revoking the visas, frankly, all the H1Bs, but we can get to that at another time. But of these Chinese foreign students, I'll read you the direct quote from this one report. Quote, many Chinese nationals have handlers. The CCP wants to know everything that's going on at Stanford. This is a very normal thing. They just relay all the information they have. Quote, parents and relatives were bought in, brought in for a talk with the police to encourage Chinese international students to overturn information. That's what we have. You want to talk about the enemy within. Now I know typically when I say enemy within, I'd probably throw a few rhinos in there. Some Democrats, probably Hillary Clinton and Jake Sullivan for good measure. Jake Sullivan, who, what now wants to be a PrimeTime commentator on MSNBC, insinuating that it's the Trump administration that killed all the wonderful accomplishments that Joe Biden had. I'm struggling to come up with any, unless you think what happened in Afghanistan is one. These people are such national security experts, yet they're concurrently advocating for Chinese Communist Party spies at best, kinetic actual foot soldiers at worst, to be here 350,000 strong in the borders of the United States of America, excluding the Chinese nationals that entered this country under Joe Biden. Now, when I say I'm all for the mass deportations, yes, we all are in this audience. I think that's probably the prerequisite chromosomal thing to be a member of the War in Posse. You got to be for the mass deportations. But when we talk about accountability, it's not just for the Venezuelans and the Hondurans and the Nicaraguans and the Mexicans. It's for the Americans. Though I'm sure they probably hate my use of that term. Who orchestrated this invasion. And by the way, to that point, it's breaking in Politico today that Joe Biden is busy hiring. Now, I would suggest it should be lawyers and lawyering up, that maybe the preemptive pardon sort of gets you ahead of that one. But tapped a guy named Chris Meager, who's a former deputy press secretary for Joe Biden and a Defense Department spokesperson to essentially run sort of PR cover for Joe Biden. It's how he ended up on the View. Don't know how they got him there in one piece. All I'm saying is I don't think at this point in the Trump administration that Joe Biden should be hiring comms experts and appearing on the View. I think he should be lawyering up, preserving his documents and more or less on trial trial or at least some paneling, some grand juries. And I don't think the fact that people like Senator Tillis are sabotaging Ed Martin's confirmation, effectively handing that seat over to someone whose morality consists of turning midair flights around full of illegal immigrant migrant gang banger criminal thugs who I think we have new reporting on Kilmart Garcia that he was, I think a taxi driver for some human trafficking ring. Diversity is our strength, I guess. But he's going to get to choose who the new D.C. attorney is. Senator Tillis doesn't want to budge on that one. Senator Tillis who's what number one donor as I reported I think two days ago, is none other then BlackRock in the financial services industry. And here's the important point in all.
Vatican Analyst
That.
Natalie Winters
The man who had potentially helmed the investigations over D.C. putting him directly under the purview of the FBI with everything that's been going on through Doge ActBlue. It's quite interesting to me that a senator who is bankrolled by some of the most, I was going to say leading, I'll say sinister financial institutions that are probably on the receiving end of most of that waste, fraud and abuse, though I would put emphasis on abuse. And I still think that's an understatement that he does not want an investigation going on. If you follow the money, you can reverse engineer what these people are hiding. And this all runs together, whether it's the Chinese Communist Party, these horrific trade deals, there are a lot of stones that have been left unturned. And we need people like Ed Martin because they are proven fighters to be able to turn them over. Not Chinese Communist Party sellouts or listless vessels for entities and corporations like BlackRock or cardinals like Theodore McCarrick who don't even care about their faith but would rather take funds from the Chinese Communist Party and chill on a stage next to Hunter Biden and the spy Q for China. I guess that's what it means to be a D.C. ruling elite. And that's what we are proud to be, the war room, home of, I guess the the counter elite insurgency. We'll be right back after the short break. Jack, so much more.
Conservative Commentator
You missed the IRS tax deadline. You think it's just going to go away? Well, think again. The IRS doesn't mess around and they're applying pressure like we haven't seen in years. So if you haven't filed in a while, even if you can't pay, don't wait and don't face the IRS alone. You need the trusted experts by your side. Tax Network usa. Tax Network USA isn't like other tax relief companies. They have an edge, a preferred direct line to the irs. They know which agents to talk to and which ones to avoid. They use smart, aggressive strategies to settle your tax problems quickly and in your favor. Whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million, Tax Network USA has helped resolve over $1 billion in tax debt. And they can help you, too. Don't wait on this. It's only going to get worse. Call Tax Network USA right now. It's free. Talk with one of their strategists and put your IRS troubles behind you. Put it behind you today. Call Tax Network USA at 1-800-958-1000. That's 800-958-1000 or visit Tax Network USA tnusa.com Bannon do it today. Do not let this thing get ahead of you. Do it today. What if he had the brightest mind in the war room delivering critical financial research every month? Steve Bannon Here, War Room listeners know Jim Rickards. I love this guy. He's our wise man. A former CIA, Pentagon and White House advisor with an unmatched grasp of geopolitics and capital markets, Jim predicted Trump's Electoral College victory exactly 312 to 226, down to the actual number itself. Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11, a moment that could define Trump's presidency and your financial future. His latest book, MoneyGPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos, bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm driven crashes, and even threats to national security. Right now, War Room members get a free copy of MoneyGPT when they sign up for Strategic Intelligence. This is Jim's flagship financial newsletter, Strategic Intelligence. I read it. You should read it. Time is running out. Go to rickardswarroom.com that's all one word. Rickards war Room Rickards with an S. Go now and claim your free book. That's rickardswarroom.com do it today.
Trevor Comstock
Hey War Room. Hope you're all doing well. My name is Trevor Comstock. I'm one of the co creators of Sacred Human and I wanted to share just a little bit more about our brand. For those who may not know of us yet, but about six months ago we decided to launch Sacred Human with really the simple mission being to provide American made natural supplements. Supplements without all the artificial nonsense. So unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health. So that's why we created Sacred Human, really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements and of course the beef liver being our flagship products. For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly biological available ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc. And because it is 100% grass fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general. So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com and cheers to your health.
Bannon’s War Room: Episode 4470 Summary
Title: Day 2 Of The Conclave; Trump Bridges Monumental Trade Deal With UK
Host/Author: WarRoom.org
Release Date: May 8, 2025
In Episode 4470 of Bannon’s War Room, host Stephen K. Bannon provides an in-depth analysis of two pivotal global events unfolding on May 8, 2025. The episode primarily focuses on the second day of the papal conclave in Vatican City, where cardinals are deliberating to elect a new Pope, and the burgeoning efforts of former President Donald Trump to finalize a monumental trade deal with the United Kingdom. Bannon, broadcasting live from Rome, navigates through real-time updates, expert opinions, and fervent political commentary, offering listeners a comprehensive overview of these significant developments.
The episode opens with a tense update on the ongoing papal conclave. After multiple rounds of voting, black smoke continues to signal that no new Pope has been elected yet. Bannon emphasizes the critical nature of the conclave proceedings, highlighting the roles of the approximately 133 eligible cardinals out of over 250 in Vatican City.
Key Highlights:
Voting Process and Delays:
The conclave has not yet produced a new Pope, with black smoke indicating ongoing deliberations. Only after reaching a 2/3 majority will the ballots be burned to release white smoke, symbolizing a successful election. The possibility remains that the conclave may extend into tomorrow if consensus is not achieved today.
Vatican Analyst [00:00]: "Two more votes will be held today... Only the age of 80 can cast."
Factional Divides:
Religious experts discuss the apparent divisions within the conclave between conservative and progressive factions. The former appeared strong in prior ballots, but recent gatherings suggest a more organized liberal faction this time around, potentially leading to a deadlock.
Religious Expert [00:56]: "Things are kind of going as you'd expect... a little more divided conclave."
Global Perspectives on the Church:
The discussion transcends Western perspectives, considering the Church's global presence in Africa and Asia, where issues like religious persecution and interreligious dialogue play significant roles. This broader view underscores the multifaceted challenges the new Pope will face.
Religious Expert [02:14]: "They tend to look at it through our Western lens... under great persecution."
Conservative Concerns:
A conservative commentator voices apprehensions about the Church potentially straying from Pope Francis's legacy, advocating for a return to traditional values and cautioning against progressive reforms that may alienate traditionalist members.
Conservative Commentator [00:50]: "The Church may go after Pope Francis in terms of its choice of a new pontiff."
Simultaneously, Bannon shifts focus to the significant trade negotiations between former President Donald Trump and the United Kingdom. Reporting live from Rome, he underscores the high stakes of the deal and its potential impact on global trade dynamics.
Key Highlights:
Trade Negotiations Underway:
Bannon anticipates an imminent announcement of a substantial trade agreement between the US and the UK, poised to reshape economic relations post-Brexit. This deal aims to strengthen economic ties and create a robust framework for future collaborations.
Stephen K. Bannon [05:00]: "President Trump very soon will be speaking from the White House... huge trade deal with the UK."
Strategic Importance:
The trade deal is positioned as a strategic maneuver to counteract globalist agendas, emphasizing national sovereignty and economic independence. Bannon frames the agreement as a victory for traditional American values and a pushback against multinational influences.
Stephen K. Bannon [15:00]: "That's who the Pope is... globalist state like Klaus Schwab."
A significant portion of the episode delves into the contentious relationship between the judiciary and political figures, particularly focusing on Supreme Court dynamics and calls for the impeachment of conservative judges.
Key Highlights:
Chief Justice John Roberts' Stance:
The episode scrutinizes Chief Justice John Roberts' comments on the role of the judiciary, interpreting his reluctance to endorse impeachment for mere disagreements as a sign of judicial overreach and bias against conservative agendas.
Political Analyst [16:27]: "Impeachment is not how you register disagreement with decisions."
Bannon’s Critique:
Bannon vehemently criticizes Roberts, accusing him of politicizing the judiciary and undermining conservative values. He challenges Roberts’ impartiality and questions the integrity of the Supreme Court in upholding conservative principles.
Stephen K. Bannon [17:37]: "John Roberts, we're not impeaching judges or talking about impeaching judges for disagreements."
Supreme Court’s Role:
Emphasizing the judiciary's intended role as a check on Congress and the executive, Bannon argues that recent decisions have deviated from this mandate, favoring liberal over conservative outcomes.
Conservative Commentator [16:27]: "The judiciary is not independent. Its job is to obviously decide cases."
Bannon intertwines discussions on the conclave and trade deal with broader political narratives, addressing topics like voter fraud, the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and internal Democratic Party dynamics.
Key Highlights:
Voter Fraud and Election Integrity:
Highlighting recent indictments related to voter fraud, Bannon connects these events to ongoing efforts to undermine election integrity, framing them as part of a larger Democratic strategy to maintain power.
Economic Commentator [29:38]: "What if he had the brightest mind in the war room delivering critical financial research every month?"
China’s Influence and Espionage:
The episode delves into alleged CCP infiltration within American institutions, citing cases like Cardinal McCarrick's interactions with CCP-affiliated entities and Stanford University's compromised environment.
Conservative Commentator [29:38]: "Many Chinese nationals have handlers... they're using people who aren't even students to act as spies."
Media and Establishment Critique:
Bannon attacks mainstream media outlets, such as The New York Times and The Atlantic, accusing them of bias and undermining conservative movements by labeling them negatively (e.g., "woke right").
Stephen K. Bannon [22:19]: "We've already called us. Certainly for me, you've called me every name that you could think of already."
To encapsulate the episode's essence, here are some standout quotes:
Vatican Analyst [00:00]:
"Two more votes will be held today... Only the age of 80 can cast."
Religious Expert [00:56]:
"Things are kind of going as you'd expect... a little more divided conclave."
Conservative Commentator [00:50]:
"The Church may go after Pope Francis in terms of its choice of a new pontiff."
Political Analyst [16:27]:
"Impeachment is not how you register disagreement with decisions."
Stephen K. Bannon [17:37]:
"John Roberts, we're not impeaching judges or talking about impeaching judges for disagreements."
Conservative Commentator [29:38]:
"Many Chinese nationals have handlers... they're using people who aren't even students to act as spies."
Episode 4470 of Bannon’s War Room presents a fervent discourse on pivotal events shaping the global and American landscape in May 2025. Through live reporting, expert analysis, and impassioned commentary, Bannon underscores a narrative of conservative resurgence against perceived liberal overreach in both religious and political spheres.
Key Takeaways:
Global Influence: The conclave's outcome is portrayed as not just a religious event but a symbol of wider ideological battles within global institutions.
Economic Strategy: Trump's trade negotiations with the UK are positioned as strategic moves to bolster American economic sovereignty and counteract globalist agendas.
Judiciary Scrutiny: The episode reflects deep concerns over judicial impartiality and the potential for politicization of the Supreme Court, emphasizing the need for conservative judicial integrity.
Media Skepticism: A recurring theme is distrust of mainstream media, viewed as adversarial to conservative values and instrumental in undermining political movements.
Overall, the episode serves as a rallying call for conservative listeners, advocating for vigilance against internal and external threats to traditional values and national interests.