Wade Miller (11:35)

Sure. So that's the conversation of the hour, is how do we get the Doge cuts done? And one of the big questions is, well, why wasn't this done on the reconciliation bill? The reason that most of the Doge cuts were not done is because they couldn't be done on reconciliation because they're for discretionary spending, they're not mandatory spending accounts. And the Byrd rule in the Senate would probably find them to be extraneous, almost certainly find them to be extraneous, and would jettison them out. So if reconciliation wasn't the vehicle, what is? And Congress could bring forth a standalone bill to cut spending that has been identified by Doge. But we all know that that would die in the Senate on a filibuster, because the Senate. So a standalone bill coming forward would just be a way for, you know, rhinos to make it look like they support doge, but not really. And so that's not an option. And so what does that leave us with? Well, you need. Either need a major piece of leverage like an appropriations bill or a CR or something like that, ndaa perhaps, that you could potentially get past the filibuster, or there's some other processes that you've been hearing about. So rescissions. Rescissions are a way that the administration can put forward a message to Congress saying, we want to cut all of this spending, and if they have 45 days to act, if they act within that 45 days to affirm it, then that spending is cut. Now, the danger with rescissions is that if Congress doesn't pass it or doesn't bring it up in 45 days, it fails and then it becomes legally a little bit more difficult to cut those doge, you know, to actually codify those DOGE cuts if it's been rejected in a rescissions package. And so one other thing that we've been looking at and we're researching it and there's some precedent on this through The GAO and OMB has written about this in 2021 and before is what's called a pocket rescission. Now, the key to a pocket rescission is that it has to be done within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year. So August, but and we're working on this. We've got a paper going into the technical details. We're hoping to have that out by the end of this week. We want to cross dot rts. But if, if all of the the math adds up here and our legal analysis is correct and we believe it will be is that if you put forward a pocket rescission within 45 days of the end of the fiscal year, that Congress doesn't need to do anything, it just automatically goes into effect. And that would be the highest percentage or the highest the, the path forward that gives us the highest chance of success. Because if you do a regular rescissions package, there's a chance that a couple, two, three senators might reject it and then that complicates the ability to actually cut those for this year. So our main focus right now is potentially if this is the the, you know, I'd be interested to know where the White House and OMB are at on this. But if this is correct, then this would be the preferred route and that would call for, in that instance, being patient and waiting until August due to do pocket rescissions as opposed to rescission packages.

Natalie Winters (14:41)

And Wade, we're coming up it does.

Wade Miller (14:43)

Look like precision packages are going to.

Natalie Winters (14:45)

I want to hold you through because I think everyone's probably wondering, well, what have these people doing with their time instead besides vacationing? We'll have you pick up where you left off. Hang with us. Warren Posse. We'll be right back after this short break.

Steve Bannon (15:00)

This July, there is a global summit of BRICS nations in Rio de Janeiro, the bloc of emerging superpowers including China, Russia, India and Persia are meeting with the goal of displacing the United States dollar as the global currency. They're calling this the Rio Reset. As BRICS nations push forward with their plans, global demand for US Dollars will decrease, bringing down the value of the dollar in your savings. While this transition won't not happen overnight, but trust me, it's going to start in Rio. The Rio Reset in July marks a pivotal moment when BRICS objectives move decisively from a theoretical possibility towards inevitable reality. Learn if diversifying your savings into gold is right for you. Birch Gold Group can help you move your hard earned savings into a tax sheltered IRA and precious metals. Claim your free info kit on gold by texting my name Bannon that's B A N N O N to 989-898 with an A plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers led birchgold army with a free no obligation info kit on owning gold before July and the Rio Reset. Text Bannon B A N N O N to 989-898 do it today. That's the Rio reset. Text Bannon at 989-898 and do it today.

Wade Miller (16:28)

Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon.

Natalie Winters (16:34)

Welcome back to the War room where of course you've always got to be checking out birchgold.com/bannon or texting Bannon to 9898 I always say, want to say getting the latest installment of the end of the dollar empire, but I think we've graduated past that. But you know, gold has always been a hedge despite what is it now, the five or six books that Steve has written with them. So go get your copy of the latest pamphlet. I forget the title, but it's fantastic. We are still joined by the also lovely and fantastic Wade Miller. Wade, if you just want to sort of pick up where you left off, but most importantly what our audience needs to know sort of as we progress, how they can be most useful, helpful and force these weak Republicans to, I don't know, do something.

Wade Miller (17:19)

Amen. You're speaking my language. So I think to kind of recap, there's two forms of rescission. One is a little bit more risky because it requires Congress to act. There's a chance they may not. I do believe that the White House is going to be I think they announced today that they're going to be sending a package. There may be another package lined up, but the bulk of the doge cuts for this year because when we're talking about rescissions, we're talking about spending for this year. The bulk of those Cuts, it appears, can be done through a pocket rescission unilaterally through the White House. And if that's the case, it would be preferable for Congress to stay out of the way and for allow the White House to essentially get most of this done in the August to September timeframe. I think what's useful for our audience is if we're asking Congress to stay out of the way because we don't trust that they're going to get it right, maybe they do a package or two, but do the rest through pocket rescissions, they need to start assuring us that they're going to enact doge cuts in fiscal year 26 through the appropriations process. We should be getting them on the record saying that they will not advance appropriations process this fall unless it enacts doge cuts going into next year so that we don't have to do rescissions on the current identified doge cuts that they're already taken care of through all of fiscal year 26. So I think that that's a path forward. I think that it gives us a good strategy to support the White House in getting these done. It gives us alleviates a little bit of the pressure because it gives us a path forward where the White House can achieve these dosh cuts for this year. But we do need Congress to get off the mats and start getting serious about the reconciliation process, which of course is different than rescissions, and then the appropriations process later this summer and into fall to permanently codify that into the new baseline.

Natalie Winters (19:11)

Wade, just give us one more minute and let the audience know. I think you guys are working on a paper, one of the wonderful research things you guys always put together when it's going to be coming out, how the audience can read it, get up close and personal to it, really internalize it, and hopefully use it in their phone calls that I'm sure they will eventually be making to their members of Congress.

Wade Miller (19:31)

Sure. So you can find us at center for Renewing America. We're we're working on a paper. We're looking through the legal analysis right now. There's precedent for it. We hope to have that paper out later this week. We will disseminate it widely. Right now it's a question of how expansive those powers are, not if those powers exist. And so we're really excited about this. If this is the thinking of the White House and it could explain their strategy. I'm not privy to their strategy, but, you know, rescissions packages are coming forward, but I'm hoping that this pocket rescission strategy is something that they're considering moving on because I do think it is the easier path forward. And we will send that out far and wide as soon as it's ready.

Natalie Winters (20:12)

Thank you, sir, for joining us. We will certainly have you back on soon. I'm sure Steve will want you on first thing when it's published.

Wade Miller (20:20)

Thanks for having me on.

Natalie Winters (20:22)

Of course. I believe I heard someone say things cannot be big and beautiful in terms of spending bills. And I would say in the same way that I do not support body positivity, big is also not beautiful when it comes to government spending packages. Also, given that what they do with that big government, remember the slogan used to be, what was it? Big government sucks. I think that's probably too euphemistic because big government censors you de platforms you, debunks you, throws you and your children in prison, destroys your country, invades it with tens of millions of illegals, and then grants H1B visas to a bunch of legal third world people as well. So it's probably a little past the demarcation line of big government sucking, and that's full blown government weaponization. But a bright spot in the Trump administration has always been the FTC in terms of what the chairman, Andrew Ferguson, has been doing to combat censorship. Today, the State Department announcing that they will be rescinding visas and frankly not giving them out to people who've been involved in the censorship of Americans. There's a very, very long list of those, those names. But I wanted to bring on Chairman Ferguson just to sort of react to what the State Department is doing and how it sort of bolsters what you guys have been doing, really since day one and frankly, even before over at the FTC in terms of combating censorship.

Andrew Ferguson (21:45)

Thanks for having me on. Start off with, I think Secretary Rubio on this front is just doing a fabulous job. I mean, you know, being a guest in the United States is a privilege. And the idea that that privilege should be extended to people who hate this country, who want to scream about their hatred in the public square, that want to burn the flag, is just absurd. So, you know, I think Secretary Rubio's approach to this and President Trump's approach to this is a long overdue. And it's such a breath of fresh air to make sure that if you are not an American, but you want to spend time in this country, at the very least you can't openly despise and hate this country and foment violence against it. So kudos to Secretary Rubio. Same on the protecting Americans from censorship. I mean, you've talked about this, Steve's talked about this. Mike Benz has been on about this for a long time. But one of the biggest risks to American speech has been coming from abroad. A lot of the organizations that have been used by Democrats and by mainstream press to suppress ideas are from outside of the United States, foreign NGOs that come up with lists of disinformation and disfavored ideas. And then people here in the United States use that to suppress speech online and in the public square. So I think this is a big step forward for protecting Americans free speech. And frankly, look, you know, we've got two free speech problems. I talked about this with you back in December. The first is the government restricting speech. And then the second are big, powerful, gateway keeping platforms that restrict free speech. And at the very least, you know, I think the Trump administration deserves a ton of credit thus far for taking the problem, both problems seriously, but at least within the government, making sure that we're doing everything we can to prevent the government from ever participating in the censorship cartel ever again. It was extremely clear during the Biden administration that government was working hand in hand with cooperative tech platforms. This is what the Missouri Against Biden lawsuit was all about, to suppress free speech by Americans. And so I think that the steps that Secretary Rubio at the State Department and President Trump throughout the whole government have taken to protect Americans from censorship abroad and from censorship by the federal government are hugely important. And we've been on this since day one at the ftc. One of the first things that we did after President Trump was inaugurated was that we asked the public, in a formal request for information, to weigh in on examples that individuals had suffered.

Wade Miller (24:28)

With.

Andrew Ferguson (24:28)

Censorship online and to tell us about their experiences. Because we're looking for two things that are covered by the laws that we enforce. The first are, you know, platforms have terms of service. Those terms of service are part of the inducement that platforms offer to people to come and spend their time on that platform instead of a different platform. And, you know, when you and I buy something, if we join, like a subscription service or if we decide to post content online, it's all pursuant to a, like a form of contract that we enter into with the platforms. And that requires us to uphold our end of the bargain as users, but it also requires the platforms to abide by their terms of service. And so one of the things that I think is really important for us to find out is were Big online platforms making censorship decisions that were contrary to the promises they were making people in their terms of service. And so that's part of what this request for information was. Were, you know, are you a user? Did you experience censorship that was inconsistent with the terms you had signed up for when you use the platform? And then the second thing, and that's because one of the laws that the FTC enforces prohibits deceptive acts and practices. And you know, a classic example of deception is promising a consumer you're going to do one thing in order to get that consumer to use your product or service and then not living up to your promises. So that's one of the things that we're interested in hearing about. And then the second is, you know, a lot of censorship decisions made by the big tech platforms, particularly in the lead up to the catastrophe of 2020 and in 2020 were sort of seem to be made in lockstep. Like a lot of these platforms had seemingly identical censorship, you know, content moderation as they like to call it policies, and the antitrust laws categorically forbidden, you know, colluding with your competitors to injure consumers. And so one of the things that we are trying to figure out was was there potentially collusion among big tech platforms to set, you know, here are all the ideas that we're collectively going to permit on our platform and here are all the ideas that we aren't. Rather than competing with each other, which is the whole notion of American free enterprise is based on competition rather than competing with each other to convince consumers to use their products. They were, you know, the question that I think we need to figure out is were platforms, you know, agreeing amongst each other not to compete on free speech grounds, not to encourage users to come on to share their ideas, but that some ideas were going to be permitted and others were not. So we, we, we've had this request for information out, we've gotten thousands of comments and you know, we've been reviewing them as they come in and you know, a lot of them were consumer commenters explaining, you know, how they suffered under the censorship cartel. But we also got comments from like the big tech backed think tanks and, and firms. And one of the most consistent accusations level at the FTC that I've seen is that the Supreme Court already said that government is not allowed to police content moderation. And they all point to this decision the Supreme Court decided two years ago called Net Choice against Paxton. And that case was about a Florida law and a Texas law that regulated censorship decisions directly. It said you can't make censorship.

Natalie Winters (28:04)

Coming up against a break. If I can hold you through it just, just for one more minute. I know the audience, you know, censorship is not a victimless crime. I think our audience is probably ground zero for, for a lot of that. We will be right back after the short break. More on the H1BS Mike Benz Pack Show. Don't go anywhere. We'll be right back.

Steve Bannon (28:27)

If you're a homeowner, you need to listen to this. In today's AI and cyber world, scammers are stealing home titles with more ease than ever. And your equity is the target. Here's how it works. Criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake notary stamp, pay small fee with your county and boom, your home title has been transferred out of your name. Then they take out loans using your equity or even sell your property. You won't even know it's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure notice. So let me ask you, when was the last time you personally checked your home title? If you're like me, the answer is never. And that's exactly what scammers are counting on. That's why I trust home title lock. Use promo code steve@hometitlec.com to make sure your title is still in your name. You also get a free title history report plus a free 14 day trial of their million dollar triple lock protection. That's 24,7 monitoring of your title, urgent alerts to any changes and if fraud should happen, they'll spend up to $1 million to fix it. Go to hometitlelock.com now. Use promo code Steve. That's hometitle lock.com promo code Steve. Do it today.

Wade Miller (29:48)

Here's your host, Stephen K. Band.

Steve Bannon (29:55)

So, so, Kurt Mills, you're one of the smartest guys out there. You just heard Mark Mitchell, another brilliant guy on the polling President Trump. Now the people think the country's on the right track. They're supporting President Trump more than ever. We know why we voted for him and we can't get enough. We love it. Obviously there's certain things we disagree with and disagree with adamantly. But hey, directionally, President Trump's delivery and the American people are seeing this, in particular this new coalition we're pulling together. Are you concerned that in one of the reasons he's a, he's a man of peace, he's a strong man. People do not cross him. These dictators throughout the world are crossing. He's a man of peace. But dude, you look at the last 72 hours in Ukraine and Russia. We're being sucked into this. And we're being sucked into this because of American weapons systems, these drones, this artificial intelligence, target acquisition and fire control solutions. What is going on here? What is the perspective of Kurt Mills and American conservatives, sir?

Kurt Mills (30:53)

Well, to link to the previous segment, I'll say the following. To the extent that we can rely on public opinion polls, and I think they have become far more rickety over the years, as you're aware, but to the extent that we view them as a good snapshot of what is going on since Trump has done his Middle east tour, since Trump has sidelined NSA Mike Waltz, and since Trump has made clear that he wants to make good on his promise of ending the endless wars, you have seen a clear spike in the polls for the president. And I think that's really notable. I mean, Trump has basically returned to the mid January position where he has the Democrats on the back heel. Now, as to the question of Russia, obviously the administration is extremely frustrated. Obviously the Russians are playing hardball. I mean, the Russians demands in and of themselves are fairly extraordinary. You know, I know, you know, our magazine is often typecast as, you know, non interventionist to a fault. But the Russian demands for territory that they have not actually conquered is a novel approach from Moscow and one that obviously the administration should rebut. And I think they are. But I think right now it's not worth panicking. Don't be a panic. And as the president said, that we are necessarily spiraling into something that Trump can't negotiate us out of. I do think what is notable and I do think what is concerning is that Putin's Lieutenant Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president again yesterday or maybe the day before, floated Russia's renewed nuclear doctrine. I mean, it's very, very clear that the IntelligenceSIA in Moscow is one, aggrieved and two, pretty nuclear curious. I mean, I mean, the intelligence assessments during the Biden administration were that the Russians got close to a 50% chance of using a tactical nuke. This is not to be trifled with. And I think that's the reason why negotiations are so key not only in Russia but also in the Middle East.

Steve Bannon (33:00)

Do you is poso right? Is is what Putin is looking at, which we've supported, but I don't see it happening right now because of so much of what's happening in Ukraine and with Persia. But do you think that they're still interested in overall rapprochement or since he was playing footsie like a Teenager with xi over the 80th anniversary of victory in Europe Day in Moscow, the parades and the 35 agreements they signed. Have you seen them backing off there? Do you still agree with, with, with Poso that this rapprochement, this overall some sort of strategic realignment we may make is still on the table and even active?

Kurt Mills (33:41)

I think Ray Prochmont with Russia is still on the table. I think what is going on is effectively, I mean, there are two main explanations in my view, for why the Russians have started playing hardball. Number one, the Russians may behind the scenes want to effectively Weimarize Ukraine, which is like even if Zelenskyy signs a piece of paper, which is dubious, or even if the US signs a piece of paper and Zelensky is not in the room. The question of Ukrainian military projection into Russia is a live one. They have routine drone strikes on Moscow. They are capable of assassinating upper crust members of the Russian military. And if you have the view that I do, which I know is not necessarily a popular view, that the Ukrainians were behind Nord Stream, or at least the evidence so far is that they were and that they potentially acted alone, there is severe cause for anxiety in Russia that even if they sign a deal, that elements of the Ukrainian government may try to keep the war going, especially since Zelensky himself fears his own hardliners. I think explanation two is that Putin himself is wary of demobilization so quickly. The war itself would mean ending today, would mean that hundreds of thousands of troops would go home potentially without jobs, potentially without pay. And of course that's unstable for any leader so quickly. And so demobilization collapsed. Germany, as you're aware, in 1918. And I don't think the Russian situation is nearly that dire. In fact, the Russians had the upper hand, the Germans did not. But still it could explain why the Russians want to drag this out. And then finally, the Russians themselves are a very, you know, this is not the Soviet Union. And I think that's a specious argument to make the, to make that claim. But the Russians themselves do have a lot of the Soviet architecture, which means it's a bear, it's a very bureaucratic society. Things go slowly, you know, oftentimes. And there's a million different, you know, check marks to make on the list before getting any deal. So, yeah, the early deal is off the table, the deal by the, you know, victory parade in early May, as some people hoped, off the table, and we could be in for a long summer. But no need to panic yet. I think we've got a hard nosed diplomatic approach for the administration and they're playing it right.

Steve Bannon (36:04)

Kristi Noem was in and supposedly was there to talk about the two young people who were assassinated in Washington, D.C. but she had time to actually meet with Netanyahu and I think inform him that President Trump's not just preferred path, but the path he's going down to some sort of diplomatic or economic deal that stops the potential for a threat of a nuclear weapon with the Persians. What's your assessment of this Netanyahu? One of the reasons Waltz is gone is behind, you know, behind the scenes meetings with some of the Israeli staff. Do you think this is playing out as you, as you envision?

Kurt Mills (36:44)

Well, I'm not sure anybody had Kristi Noem, all due respect to the secretary, as Trump's bad cop on their, on their play sheet, but that appears to be what happened. I mean, Huckabee embraced her when she came and then per all reportings. And look, whatever you think of Israel, the Israeli press is quite good. And the Israeli press has basically reported that she delivered a tough message which is back off, the president wants to negotiate with Iran. We're very committed to having a ceasefire in Gaza. And again, as reported again in the Times this morning, the White House is pushing back ferociously on the idea that the Israelis might do a unilateral strike on the Iranians. So Noem was clearly, and I think you had the clip in the previous segment, clearly messaging in this direction. It's unclear to the degree to which the Gaza negotiations being led by Wyckoff and the Iranian negotiations also being led by Wybkoff are twinned. Of course, extreme hardliners and neoconservatives view a Sunni Islamic militant group in Gaza as hook, line and sinker with the Iranians. I think that is not true. But obviously these are partners and it is very possible the two pieces are being negotiated together. But again, it's separate negotiations, separate cities. The Hamas negotiations are in Doha, the Iranian negotiations are in Muscat, in Rome. And again, the president, you know, sort of exploded the news cycle this weekend, Memorial Day weekend by saying we could have an Iran deal in a day or two. And you know, there's this sort of due ex machina explanation of how we could have an Iran deal, which is again, it was, I've been hearing it over the weekend, but it was in buried in the Times report this morning that they are looking at this and has been floated before this civil nuclear agreement between Iran, potentially the Gulf allies in the US and then additionally the Iranian nuclear chief today indicated something he never did or something that the Iranians never did under Obama, that they would be opening open to American inspectors of their weapons program. So I mean this is, this has gone well beyond jcpoa. Anyone who says this is a redux of the Obama deal is lying. And I think that this is fairly extraordinary and we are quite close to a diplomatic breakthrough.

Steve Bannon (39:05)

Is American conservative in yourself, are you guys comfortable with even an advanced verification program like this and not a taking it apart brick by brick, peacefully, not with air rays, but peacefully doing whatever you need to do economically to get them there? Are you guys comfortable that we can live with even a verification program, that we have inspectors going in? Sir.

Kurt Mills (39:29)

I think we are. I mean, look, I mean if the Iranians called up the United States yesterday and said we want to unilaterally disarm, we want to get rid of all our stuff, you know, I think we should accept that deal. But they're not going to do it. The reality is zero enrichment of any sort of having no nuclear program whatsoever is they're almost certainly going to walk away from the deal and if they sign it, they're just going to be lying. So it's not really a deal worth pursuing, but a civil enrichment compendium or corridor with the Gulf states, with the US with US inspections I think is quite acceptable. And it's very important and I don't want to be a broken record on this, but it's very important not to repeat the mistakes of Iraq. Iraq had weapons inspectors. They found no weapons and they turned out there weren't any weapons. And in sometimes in these tough countries and tough parts of the world, a lot of times the hardliners just need to signal for their own security and for their own sort of self belief, but they don't actually have the weapons. It's hard to conceal these things. We don't know everything about Iran, but they're under constant surveillance. They know the Israelis as, as disclosed by WikiLeaks by the late Colin Powell. We know The Israelis have 200 plus nuclear weapons and they're all trained on Tehran. The DACA stack, DACA stack against them. We don't need to make an unforced error here.

Steve Bannon (40:55)

Kurt, what is your social media and how do people get over to the great magazine that you helm? And now that our own Catherine o' Neill is on your board, it makes it even stronger. Where do people go? Thanks.

Kurt Mills (41:07)

It's www.theamericanconservative.com we have been founded and running out of Washington D.C. since 2002 when we were founded against the Iraq war by conservatives and friends. And then my own channel is Urt Mills C U R T M I L L S on X Twitter, you know, pretty active.

Steve Bannon (41:25)

Thank you. And I want to have you back in the next couple days. We'll get your schedule freed up to come back. And I want to discuss this more in Russia, more with you. You got fascinating the Kurt Mills Tucker Carlson School of National Security. I call it. Kurt. Brilliant young man. Jim Rickards, you've heard a lot this morning. What are your thoughts?

Jim Rickards (41:47)

Steve, I just like to draw a connection between two separate things you've been discussing. One is the BRICS Summit conference is coming up in Rio de Janeiro very shortly. So that's a big deal in and of itself. There's not going to be a new BRICS currency. I remind people that the brics already have a global currency. It's called gold. You can settle transactions in gold and they do. It's non digital, you can move it around, you can't interdict it, etc. So they're already there. They're working on payment systems and the war in Ukraine, which we talked about and one of Lindsey Graham's sanctions, but also something Zelensky talked about the other day. They want to take the $300 billion of U.S. treasury securities lawfully bought by Russia that are in about 200 billion of them are in Euroclear, the rest are scattered along various bank custodians and use that to fund the war. And Zelensky said the other day, hey, you know, because Trump probably the House Representatives will not approve, I don't expect they will approve new funding for the war in Ukraine. But Zelensky says no problem, just take the $300 billion of Russian assets and use that to pay for all the weapons systems. So what's the connection between those two things? If you're India or you're Brazil or Saudi Arabia, and by the way, the BRICs have expanded, of course, it's not just the original five. And you're watching this, you're saying, hey, what if the US doesn't like what I do? What if they steal my U.S. treasury securities that I hold, my reserve positions, etc. So by our, by our folly in Ukraine, this isn't a freeze. We freeze stuff all the time. US Is good at it. This is theft, this is armed robbery of the Russian assets. Lindsey Graham's all in on this, by the way. This would be part of his new round of sanctions. But if you're any other country and you're watching this, you're saying, get me out of U.S. treasury securities. Maybe you have to have some because there's no other asset class in the world that, that's big. But there are.

Steve Bannon (43:33)

Hey, Jim, Jim, Jim, just. Hey, Jim. Hang on, hang on one second. We're gonna take a short commercial break. I want to continue this. Jim Rickards is with us. Rickardswarroom.com Go check out the landing page. Today, Strategic Intelligence. What if he had the brightest mind in the war room delivering critical financial research every month? Steve Bannon here. War Room listeners know Jim Rickards. I love this guy. He's our wise man. A former CIA, Pentagon and White House advisor with an unmatched grasp of geopolitics and capital markets. Jim predicted Trump's electoral College victory exactly 3:12 to 226, down to the actual number itself. Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11, a moment that could define Trump's presidency and your financial future. His latest book, MoneyGPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos. Bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm driven crashes and even threats to national security. Right now, War Room members get a free copy of MoneyGPT when they sign up for Strategic Intelligence. This is Jim's flagship financial newsletter, Strategic Intelligence. I read it. You should read it. Time is running out. Go to Rickards War room dot com. That's all one word. Rickards War Rooms records with an S. Go now and claim your free book. That's Rickards War room dot com. Do it today.

Wade Miller (45:02)

Here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.

Natalie Winters (45:08)

Welcome back back to the War room. Quick programming note for those of you who are blessed enough to be on the west coast living in Washington state. I and James o' Keefe are actually going to be, say co headlining. He can be the headliner, I'll be the opening act. He obviously has wonderful work in Yakima, Washington for their kind of Lincoln day dinner. Yakima.gop for the tickets. August 9th meet and greets dinner. All the fun stuff. I always look forward to getting to meet the posse in person, in the flesh. It's so fun. Remember they what took years of our lives away from us and they said we couldn't meet in person so we got to make up for lost time. And of course in the Washington area, I think the FBI has been opening a ton of investigations into targeted violence against Christians coming at the hands of, you guessed it, antifa, which I guess is just a Euphemistic word nowadays for the Democratic Party. That's Yakima dot, GOP. August 9th. Come see me. James O' Keeffe. Who knows, maybe some special guests, maybe Mike Benz. He's always traveling. Or maybe he'll have to come by and say hi. Though I would demand that you wear a tux like you did, I think, one time here on the war room. Mike, we've got a few minutes left. You were just getting to the good stuff. If you want to pick up where you left off on this whole, you know, using visa warfare, that's what we'll call it.

Mike Benz (46:26)

Yes, well, but this is a appropriate escalation for the attacks on American sovereignty that are being done by foreign governments and their US Shadow cabinet, shadow diplomacy, allied corps within the blob of the United States. And the fact is, is a message has to be sent that if you attack us, you're not welcome here. If you attack us, there will be consequences for you. And this is done in the name of American values. This is the sort of thing that the US was doing constantly in the 20th century to promote free speech and to fight against autocratic governments who would censor the speech of their citizens and journalists. And frankly, I think that much more needs to be done on this front. And while this is incredible action, the fact is, if you look at a case like Brazil, Brazil is one of the most severe examples of government abuse of censorship, to imprisonment and to mass censor tens of millions of citizens in Brazil in order to keep the in power government, which is highly corrupt, from being exposed. In fact, the judges even ruled the Marias in Brazil that calling Lula corrupt is effectively against the law because it might impact elections. If you allege that that president is corrupt. Now, you could call Bolsonaro corruption and others from his party. But the fact is, is there are many levels of coordination and cooperation between the US and Brazil. Obviously at the State Department layer, it's a very, very critical one. And I was also delighted to see the US Embassy in Brazil echo Secretary Rubio's message about the visa stoppage. I believe sanctions are also likely a necessary part of the toolkit to be applied so that it's not just the visas, but that there are economic inducements. And beyond that, I believe that cooperation between the U.S. military and the Brazilian military needs to be addressed. The fact is, is Brazil's military is completely reliant on the US they get their equipment, they get their training. They're the second largest military in the Western Hemisphere and they've had a total free check. While the human rights abuses in Brazil continue, I believe that can continue no longer. In addition to that, I believe that Brazil's involvement in the international narcotics trade has to be examined by this government. The PCC cartel is already infiltrating here in Miami and is a big part of this decision, I should say, of this cartel soup that the Trump administration has been focused on to get rid of illegal narcotics by declaring drug gangs to be terrorists. Well, there's a big fat one in Brazil, and I believe that that should also be a focus of this as well, given that the head of that cartel, the PCC cartel, actually said in a recorded video that he hoped that Lula would win because it was better for his own business. It appears that the Lula regime is protecting the narco gangs, and I believe that's a national security threat to the United States of America.

Natalie Winters (49:36)

Mike Benz, you break things down like most people can't, or frankly probably don't want to, because I don't know about you. All this stuff is so hard to track, and they make it that way by design. But we're very grateful for the analysis and insight you bring to the worm. If people want to follow you and get much more of it, where can they go to do that?

Mike Benz (49:55)

Follow me on X ikebencyber.

Natalie Winters (49:59)

Thank you, sir. I. I'm just giving out compliments left and right today. Thank you so much for joining us.

Mike Benz (50:03)

You're wonderful as well.

Natalie Winters (50:04)

Despite the fact that congressional Republicans suck and are doing absolutely nothing except plunging this country further into, you know, at least have the nerve. At least Democrats are forthright with their depravity and perversion and weird sexualities. I guess what I'm about to say is twofold. Republicans lie to you. Not just, frankly about that stuff, like I said, what they're doing in their extracurricular activities, but they insult your intelligence when they make you think that just because they take a selfie with Elon and join the Doge Caucus that we're not going to notice that they want to say, what, hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine and think that USAID is how we're going to advance soft power and defeat the Chinese Communist Party. Yeah. It's doing so well in Africa, what, upwards of 90% or country. 90% of countries signed on to the Belt and Road Initiative. Yeah. I guess by DC metrics, that's probably efficient and effective. We're not buying it here in the war room, but what we are buying in the war room. How's that for Segue is my pillow. Mike Lindell joins us now from outside a courthouse, the Denver courthouse, I believe hit us with the in your life and what you've got going on at my pillow. You got about a minute and a half.

Stephen K. Bannon (51:14)

Okay, real quick everybody. Remember I worked personally with President Bolsonaro in Brazil. There's an example of a country if you don't get to paper ballots hand counted, what can happen to Here in the US 132 countries have banned electronic voting machines. I have fought this for five years. And here I am at the courthouse this in Denver, Colorado, the federal courthouse. This coming Monday, my pillow and myself go to jury trial. And we need your help. Is as simple as that. We need the war room posse's help. So what we've decided to do, Natalie, the keys of dream sheets that we have in inventory, we're going to run this for 4998 just to generate resources for this trial. We have to win everybody. This will be the gateway to saving our country. I really believe that. I told our president we will not let your four years be in vain. 4998. Any size, any color, promo code, war room. And then also I'm going to give you, if you buy today, a free commemorative MyPillow 2.0 with the American flag. Any purchase, you get that free. Plus if you go to the website and you scroll down and you click on Steve, there's the special, there's the gate, the dream sheets. If you buy $100 or more, I'm going to match you with $100 in free digital gifts. And you can click on if you see me holding the American flag. There you can learn all about this lawsuit and what's going to happen and what and how we're going to win this, call 1-800-873-1062. The most sought after promo code in the United States and around the world.

Natalie Winters (52:46)

War Room. I like it. Around the world. All the countries that are busy censoring Americans. Well, maybe we'll have to strip some of the war room promo code too. Warren Posse, thank you for hanging with me. Steve's taking the six. I'll see you guys soon.

Steve Bannon (53:01)

Health isn't just a personal issue. It's a family issue, a community issue. We're living in unpredictable times. Supply chains can break down, hospitals can get overwhelmed. And let's not even start on the natural disasters. These aren't hypotheticals. They're happening. You see it here in the war room and we all know it. The question is Simply, are you ready? That's where Jace comes in. This isn't just a kit. This is a Jace case. It's a lifeline. It's a personal supply of prescribed emergency medications that puts the power back in your hands. Whether it's an unexpected illness or a global disruption of supply chains, you can act fast and protect yourself and your loved ones. This February, show them you care in a way that really matters. Be prepared. Get the Jace case today so you'll have the right meds on hand the moment you need them. Visit jacemedical.com and use the code Bannon B A N N O N at checkout for a discount on your order. That's Jace medical.com promo code Bannon. Get the Jace case and do it today.

Kurt Mills (54:08)

To provide American made natural supplements without all the artificial nonsense. So unfortunately, as many of you know, a lot of these big corporate supplements will include things like preservatives, artificial ingredients and other additives that really aren't benefiting your health. So that's why we created Sacred Human. Really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements. And of course the beef liver being our flagship products. For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc. And because it is 100% grass fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other stuff. Synthetic vitamin in general. So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com and cheers to your health.