Transcript
Natalie Winters (0:00)
But that was a part of him kind of presenting his product for President Trump. And they had a fun moment in the car and talked about the innovation of Tesla and all of that. So that was one of my personal moments with Elon Musk. But I got to tell you, Mike, that, that, that moment today in the Oval Office kind of firing back at the reporter talking about the New York Times. And that was kind of a fun moment. Even though I wasn't there, I enjoyed watching it.
Mike (0:30)
You know, I think it's a whole new energy. Okay. It's a whole new energy in the golden age of America. All right, we are going to toss it over to Natalie Winters who's going to pick up anchoring the coverage here as President Trump is getting set to take the stage any minute down in Western Pennsylvania. Golden age tour American steel victory lap. Natalie, over to you.
Stephen K. Bannon (0:56)
Thank you so much, Mike and Brian and Ben, what an all star panel. I think Ben Berkhweim is going to remain with us throughout probably the pregame, the speech and hopefully he'll give us some post game analysis to Today is Of course Friday, May 30th in the year of our Lord 2025. If we want to bring the show in, let's bring the show in. We got some guests that we will, like I said, use in our pregame up to President Trump's, I'm sure. Wonderful speech.
Mike (1:24)
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. You're just not going to get a free shot. All these networks lying about the people, the people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it.
Rich Stern (1:44)
It's going to happen.
Stephen K. Bannon (1:46)
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA media. I wish in my soul I w.
Mike (1:53)
That any of these people had a conscience. Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. War room, here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.
Stephen K. Bannon (2:15)
Welcome to the war room. It's Natalie Winters Hosting today, Friday, May 30th in the year of our Lord 2024 5, we're giving you some pre Trump speech coverage. He is out in Pennsylvania continuing, I think a wonderful tour, celebrating, appreciating and hopefully incentivizing more Americans to get involved in steel, obviously a critical industry that like we were talking about before, the Chinese have really outpaced us now for decades. There's a graph I think the studio should have if we want to put on screen, just to sort of set the stage for what will be President Trump's steam speech. Before we get to Rich Stern of Heritage, who's going to give us the latest on all things. There you go. You see that? Absolutely wild. On all things tariffs, trade, the great numbers that we saw President Trump play in the Oval Office today during his press conference with Elon Musk. I just wanted to set the stage. Obviously, we've seen some evolving decisions coming from the bench, the very radical bench about all things tariffs, the constitutionality of what the Trump administration and people like Peter Navarro have done, particularly when it comes to China. There's been a lot of reporting coming out that the chief judge, an individual by the name of Mark Barnett, basically bypassed a lot of the standard protocol in terms of judge selection to set it up so that the three judges who were tasked with adjudicating all of the cases pertaining to President Trump's tariffs had a long, long track record, a cv, a resume, basically excl of anti Trump decisions anytime they bumped up against him. Which I guess fair points, probably most judges, not just in D.C. but across this country. But I think it's just important to make one key point. The timing of all of this is so critical, and not just because of what is going on here in the United States when it comes to our economic warfare with China, but more importantly with what's going on abroad. And I'm not just talking about what's been transpiring in the South China Sea and how China's really been ramping up some of their alternative weapons strategies like we've been talking about here in the war for a while. But right now, the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, is overseas in Singapore for the annual dialogue, the Shangri La, where they're meeting with, you know, a dozen plus countries a day, having their bilats, their bilateral meetings, basically all tasked with focusing on American defense in the context of Asia, and most importantly, in the context of combating the Chinese Communist Party. So it's quite interesting, I think, that you see these judges choosing to get involved on what is probably the most intense form of economic warfare that we have ever waged against the Chinese Communist Party in essentially the same timeframe. Right. Plus or minus a few hours, when the Department of Defense is engaging in arguably the most critical, I would say, juncture, of waging actual war, kinetic or otherwise, against the Chinese Communist Party and a bunch of radical left wing or establishment Republican judges are trying to send a signal saying that the United States is not serious about actually taking on the threat that is the Chinese Communist Party. Right. And I think when you broaden this out, obviously the paradigm that we've been seeing, the Alien Enemies act, the idea of deporting illegal aliens under the idea that it was an invasion, using powers that are only, you know, I guess, leveraged by the president, should it have been viewed as an invasion? I think you can broaden that out to these tariffs too. Right. If you believe that the PRC is at war with us, which we certainly do here in the war room, perhaps it's not kinetic yet. Right. It might just be economic warfare then in the same way, these tariffs are a form of, I would say maybe ammo, but maybe armor is a better metaphor to compare it to. So I think you're actually seeing an escalation, not just of these judges adjudicating policy from the bench and trying to usurp President Trump's presidential authorities. Imagine that. But they are now essentially acting as commander in chief. So that's why we always say we're not hurtling towards a constitutional crisis, we are actively in one. And of course, you're already starting to see the judges get involved with the foreign students, particularly the Chinese visas over at Harvard, saying that you can't do that. It's, you know, who knows, racist. I'm sure that's probably somewhere in the actual textual documents that they're going to be apoplectic. Sorry, no. We should be deporting all of these people. We should not be educating the next generation of enemy combatants, kinetic information, economic or otherwise. And you can suck on that. Silicon Valley and all of you tech bros who what are employing, I think 70% of all your workers are foreign born. Yeah, that doesn't sound very America first to me. So if you're going to wear the MAGA hat, maybe, I don't know, try to aim to hire. Hey, I'll take 50, should be 100. But you know, anyways, I digress on all of that. I think we have Rich Stern, who I'm sure probably has some thoughts on what I was talking about. Rich, I wanted to bring you on just to sort of give us an update on all things tariffs, but also just the wonderful numbers. I'm sure you saw President Trump played him in the Oval Office. They were first a war room cold open, might I add. But if you can just give us your thoughts.
