Transcript
Stephen K. Bannon (0:02)
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. You're just not getting a free shot. All these networks lying about the people, the people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen.
Natalie Winters (0:23)
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA MEDIA I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these had a conscience.
Stephen K. Bannon (0:33)
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.
Stephen K. Bannon (0:43)
War Room, here's your host, Stephen K. Band.
Natalie Winters (0:51)
Welcome to the War room. It's Friday, June 6th, in the year of our Lord 2025. Natalie Winters hosting, filling in for Stephen K. Bannon. But don't go anywhere. You guys probably know by now there's not controversial going on in the news. Don't worry, we're going to get to all of that, but we're going to focus on the actual, dare we say, kinetic threats. Of course, the Chinese Communist Party, you know, War Room has always proudly been the home of signal, not noise. And that's we're going to keep giving you, I think for me, the sort of top line signal assessments of what has come out of this Elon Trump debacle. Placing the blame square, squarely on the former, is that first and foremost, we will not be distracted from our end game and end goal of dismantling, defanging, deconstructing the administrative state. DOGE had a good purpose, it had a good intention. But I think we can all agree that it did not actually seal the deal on the $2 trillion in cuts. And it's not President Trump's job or our job as this audience to cover for where Doge did not complete the mission that they were tasked and not even that they were tasked with, that they came up with organically. That being said, we of course love the mission of doge. I think to its core it represents Bannonism, right? Getting rid of the administrative state. But I also think that this audience, what have we always been focused on, the most important thing, which is election integrity. And we're not going to be distracted from turning out votes, knocking on doors, doing what we do best by petty sideshow distractions on social media platforms that this country would probably be better off without. And to that point, I think it's also worth noting that I think there was one word that particularly stood out to me that Elon Musk used that I think I take offense to and that I think this audience should take offense to. And certainly President Trump. And it's the idea of ingratitude. We're obviously grateful for what Elon did in terms of putting, you know, 200 and what is it, some odd million dollars into the state of Pennsylvania. But at the end of the day, it was this audience. It was the people who knocked doors, who got their hands dirty, who persevered, who put up with the FBI details and the FBI raids and the monitoring and the prosecutions, the persecutions, the jail times, the jail sentences, who really put the legwork in. And if we were to just sell this movement out to the highest bidder or the donor class, I think we would frankly end up back in square one, which is where we all started the advent of the Trump revolution, which was the idea that we could decouple not just from the Chinese Communist Party, but from the donor class to begin with. And just because the people who write the big checks say that we have to care about, you know, insert whatever issue it is that doesn't actually matter for working class Americans, we don't have to take that as our own. The other I would say flag I would plant very firmly right now is that obviously the Tech Bros. Love them, hate them. I think you know where this show stands on that. We cannot allow Elon to be replaced. And I don't use that word in a loaded term, but just generically with someone who I would argue is much worse. I'm sure Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos and all of those types of have been calling the White House nonstop to try to become the new little buddy or not so little buddy. And I think that this audience should draw the line in the sand right now that President Trump is best when we let Trump be Trump. And we don't need any sidekicks by the name of Mark Zuckerberg hanging around the Oval Office or anywhere near it. I think he should sell the house he just bought in D.C. and kick him out if it were up to me. But I digress. I want to get though to the serious stuff, and that is, of course, the prc, particularly what they're doing. Peru, there was a great new piece, if you want to toss it up on screen. And real clear defense. All minerals are local. China's man in Lima, of course, we've been talking about not just China's monopoly and really stranglehold over these rare earths, the sourcing of them, but particularly the processing. What is it dominating? I think 90% of the world's sort of ability to do that, to export the magnets, the batteries, the semiconductors, take your pick. But this article really points out a term that I like, how Peru is becoming the next strategic outpost in China's global infrastructure web. Of course, it's sort of the BRI style infrastructure buying over, but particularly their grooming and I use that word and it's full definition future presidential candidate. So I want to bring the author of that piece, Nate Picarsik, whose last name I hope if I am pronouncing correctly on the show, to sort of walk us through the piece. And Nate, I'm curious why you think Peru is a country not just that the PRC is very interested in right now, but why our audience needs to be up to date on what they're trying to do there.
