
Episode 4579: Banging The Drums Of War; Will There Be Troops On The Ground...
Loading summary
Commentator 1
Common wisdom about this president, about the political movement that he leads, is that he is supposedly isolationist, that he is supposedly anti war. That has never been exactly right. That's always been kind of a lazy common wisdom. In less than six months back in office, he has threatened military action against Panama, against Canada, against Denmark in order to seize Greenland. He has bombed Yemen over and over and over again. And now he appears to have entered the United States military into a war in Iran, something that neoconservatives have thrilled to for, I guess, two generations now. A lot of commentary around the Trump phenomenon and Trump's politics would suggest that he has risen in opposition to the neoconservatives who have advocated for this type of war since essentially the Iranian Revolution in 1979. But since 1979, the US military has not engaged directly with Iran, but Donald Trump has done so. Tonight, Donald Trump has ordered US Military bombing raids on Iran. We are now in war with Iran. I actually got emotional over this attack because we finally have some sign of retribution for them killing us for so many years. And we just kept taking it on the chin. No doubt that because of the President's decisive action, we have severely damaged to Iran's critical nuclear infrastructure. I think we have to be prepared for Iran to retaliate. And I joined the President in his warning to the supreme leader of Iran that if he targets Americans, the military force he will see will make last night look like child's play. There's no question Iran was working towards having a nuclear weapon. That is without question. Everyone knows it, that looks at the data on this. The question is, will they be allowed to be able to actually finish their work, to be able to do that? President Trump said, no, you cannot do that for the security of the entire world and of American citizens living in that region. I don't know how anybody could have been surprised at this. I think President Trump certainly telegraphed it. He said he's going to make his decision a couple of weeks. I certainly understand why President Trump would not share that information with the Democrats in Congress. And again, the operational security is just so crucial to protect our servicemen and women. I didn't need notice. I've been saying for over a week, it'll be the President's decision. I will support that decision. You can see this is the before satellite image of the Fordo nuclear plant. And then after, you can see these craters, three craters here and here. Presumably those are the impacts of the US Bunker busting bombs. Now, the key is to assess how much damage was actually done underground, that's ongoing. And as that happens, an incredible amount of awareness now on the possibility of the Iranian counterattack. Finish it. Yeah, well, just think we're in such a better place as a result of the attack than what we were before. And I think when you look at this, is this going to end at a negotiating table or is this going to end on a battlefield? And Iran, they've got to go through a couple of things. One, I think the status of the damage and a nuclear enterprise is a factor in their decision making in my view. Also, they're on their own time schedule and where we're kind of getting into the crouch and getting ready for an attack. But they may take their time. This is their time schedule. A meeting has now begun between Vladimir Putin and Abbas Arakchi. Cameras were allowed in at the start of the talks. We saw and heard the pair exchange comments between translators. Vladimir Putin called the aggression against Iran groundless. He said that their meeting will give them the chance to find ways out of the current situation. And he added, most importantly, perhaps that Russia was ready to help the Iranian people. But the question everyone wants to know the answer to is what kind of help will that constitute from Russia? If Tehran is seeking military help from Moscow, I think are actually going to be leaving here empty handed, leaving here disappointed. And I say that for a number of reasons. Firstly, assuming things stay as they are, by the way. Firstly, although the countries have this strategic partnership deal that they signed in January that sought to deepen their military cooperation, there's no mutual defense clause contained within it. So there's no legal obligation for Moscow to step in and provide military aid to Tehran. And the second reason is that all of Russia's attention and resources right now are focused on Ukraine. And so I think they're reluctant to be dragged into another conflict. And I think they might be hard pressed to as well. And the third reason is that this comes at a time when Moscow is trying to get closer to Washington and improve relations there. If they back Iran militarily now, then I think of course that will derail that kind of warming relationship there. So I don't think we're going to see at this stage any material support from Moscow for Tehran. At the same time, though, Moscow is very wary of things progressing towards regime change in Iran. They lost an important strategic ally in Syria when the Bashar Al Assad regime fell there in December. And they don't want the same thing happening right now. So for now, I think Moscow is going to be pursuing and working very hard to achieve a diplomatic resolution. They're uniquely placed to do that. They've got these strong ties with Iran. They've got warm relations historically with Israel, and there's this budding personal relationship between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. So I think the Kremlin is going to be trying to talk everyone down. And at this meeting today with the Iranian foreign minister, I think Putin clearly knows that Iran has to respond, but I think he's going to be trying to persuade them to limit that response to a symbolic one, hoping that then they can draw a line underneath this. And if he can do that, then he will be preserving Russia's interests in the region, but also potentially gaining some leverage with Donald Trump that he could then interpret news when it comes to Ukraine and US Military support for Kyiv. It's a big if, and there's a lot of things playing into it. But Russia has a lot of stake in how this progresses, and there's a lot that remains unpredictable. Talk to me, Rick Stengel, about where Prime Minister Netanyahu factors into this debate. Well, he's the big winner in all of this, and he seems to be conducting American foreign policy, masterminding American intelligence. He had tried the last three presidents, including the first Trump administration, to persuade those American presidents that Iran was imminently about to have a nuclear weapon and the US Needed to help Israel obliterate it. He finally persuaded Donald Trump in his second term. He's a very persuasive fellow. He sees this ideologically. You know, one of the problems of having an American president who sees foreign policy in terms of the personality of foreign leaders is it makes him more receptive to the argument of those foreign leaders. Remember, early in his first term, he said he trusted Vladimir Putin's description of our intelligence more than our own intelligence services. So, you know, Bibi is really guiding a lot of what's happening here. And we should be talking about what he sees as the next step, because that's going to help focus what the American electorate is going to see. Meanwhile, President Trump is floating the idea of a regime change in Iran. In a truth social post yesterday, the president wrote, quote, if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change? This is the first time Trump's raised the possibility of changing the leadership in Iran since Israel launched that war 11 days ago. The president's comments also break from the response of the rest of his administration that they've been taking, as they've been saying, the intention of Saturday's strike was not to push for regime change but to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Times the military has to be used. If it's used by a smart commander in chief, if it's used wisely, if it's used for a specific purpose it gives us peace. So I want the so called, I don't know what to call them people running around warmonger, the sloganeers. This should be an education for you too. This should be an education for you too America. Don't you feel relief? Of course you feel relief because these Islamo Nazis were building nuclear weapons to attack us too with intercontinental ballistic missiles. Guess what? You can go to bed peacefully tonight. No, that's not going to happen. That's not going to happen. Not because of Obama, not because of Biden, not because of the Democrats, not because of some Republicans, because of Donald Trump. This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people reasons I got a free shot. All these networks lying about the people, the people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen. And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA media I wish in my soul I wish that any of these people had a conscience. Ask yourself what is my task and what is my purp? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. War room here's your host Stephen K B Monday 23 June in the year of our Lord 2025 in a sweltering imperial capital don't you feel, didn't you go to bed Saturday night feeling better? Haven't you felt better all weekend? Mark Levin the propaganda department over there the hectoring of Fox because now the psyops moving to a. They're moving to a different location we're getting that in just a moment. Didn't you go, didn't you feel better? Don't you feel better? The engine room also in going through the the cold open I want to thank my team just amazing cold open did you get enough neocons there? Because we can load it up a lot more folks just for proportionality Every dollar we spend focus on this every second we spend focus on this we're not focused on the main thing although the moolahs are an ally as I said for all five years of the show they provide the oil for them. Dave Walsh is going to join us for that. Sam Faddis is going to join us for intel. His thoughts. Jack Posobic's here. We're going to take this out in the second hour. We're going to get off the Iran war because part of this psyop is to get us not to focus on what's important for this country, for America first. And we're going to do that. And we're going to do that every day. We're going to spend time on the war as we have to. Right. And we should. But we're not going to get totally consumed by this, because to get totally consumed by this is to fall into their trap, to not focus on what's important in this country. The engine room informs me, though, for proportionality, Mark Levin and all, General Keane. Love General Keane. Great guy, Jack Keane. Although General Keane is kind of morphing into the General in, in Dr. Strangelove a little bit. This is either going to be ended now or ended on a battlefield. They're just, they're set to go. What's happening now is that I think we lost a big part of initiative yesterday morning. And I was very disappointed. And I love Pete Hexa. This audience does. As you know, we went fixed ban X to get Pete as DOD and raising Cain, a good man, and has President Trump's confidence. But number one, we should have gone to the initiative. I needed. We needed to see some grainy photographs like Schwarzkopf put up. And they were out there because a couple hours later, hour later, msnbc, CNN were putting up and driving the initiative of exactly what happened. I understand DOD that you don't have the battle damage assessment that's going to take three or four weeks, as you said, but there's enough there to kind of take and start to drive the narrative. We lost that opportunity. I've been all weekend saying somebody at the Pentagon's got to stand up in front of a podium that says Pentagon in front of it and actually give us a first cut. Photographs are all over. We need an initial preliminary subject to change draft assessment of exactly what was accomplished. President Trump is so proud of this, as he should. The precision, logistics, bravery, valor, boldness of the attack itself, unquestioned. Right? But exactly what was accomplished. Number two, because, you see now it's all about, hey, we don't know where the material is. You see the New York Times, the Financial Times in London, the Drumbeat on Fox. What is that? What's that going to lead us to, folks? Hey, do we need the 75th Ranger Battalion to go in and find it. Oh, it's coming, it's coming. And of course you saw the regime change narrative over the weekend, right? They're going to drive that. You saw the, the Cha Veran son. I don't know, a guy that's been partying in New York for 40 years, 50 years, they're now at the podium saying they're calling all remember Chalabi. This is Chalabi 2.0. Remember Chalibi? We got Chalaby 2.0. And all that stuff's fine as long as we're not part of it. But I come at the battle damage assessment. If we got enough of it done, hey, then it's to the Israelis. Because I think the tell here and I think very upsetting is why did the United States have to take on the other two? The other two facilities were never mentioned in the rows. Arch Fordo can't get to Fordo. Need. Need bunker busting bombs to get to Fordo. Why is the US Navy in the North Arabian Sea firing 30 Tomahawks at one of the facilities? Why was that not taken out by the air supremacy of the Israeli Air force? Was the entire thing for the nukes just cosplay? Is this because the ultimate goal is regime change? And if that's fine, Israelis, have at it. Like we said, finish what you started. If you want regime change, go for it baby. Just no participation by the United States government. Short break Fattest Wash Posobic Next In America's heart this July there is a global summit of BRICS nations. In Rio de Janeiro the block of emerging superpowers including China, Russia, India and Persia are meeting with the goal of displacing the United States dollar as the global currency. They're calling this the Rio Reset. As BRICS nations push forward with their plans, global demand for US dollars will decrease bringing down the value of the dollar and and your savings. While this transition won't not happen overnight, but trust me, it's going to start in Rio. The Rio Reset in July marks a pivotal moment when BRICS objectives move decisively from a theoretical possibility towards inevitable reality. Learn if diversifying your savings into gold is right for you. Birch Gold Group can help you move your hard earned savings into a tax sheltered IRA and precious metals. Claim your free info kit on gold by texting my name Bannon. That's B A N N O N to 989-898 with an A plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers. Let Birchgold army with a Free no obligation info kit on owning gold before July and the Rio reset. Text Bannon B A N N O N to 989-898. Do it today. That's the Rio reset. Text Bannon at 989-898 and do it today. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bannon. As the engine room informs me, it's a million deaths by fentanyl. We have a million Deaths by fentanyl. 50,000 a year. Oh, and we got 10,000, by the way. Every American serviceman, including the Marines in. In Beirut, who should have been. The vengeance on them should have come years ago, decades ago. And the money, I think, still held up in court. Right. I got it. And the Iranians are bad guys. Today, right now, the Israelis bombing Tehran. I think they're having Bastille Day there. The bomb in the prison, the bombing the Revolutionary Guard headquarters. Good on you. Bomb away. The talking about regime change. They got the Shah's son, like I said, he had a press conference. He's Chalabi, too. They're getting all that together in New York City. A proxy for. This is what's happening in New York City right now with. With that mayor's race. You watch, you're going to have a radical Islamic mayor, a socialist to top everything off. But that's the least of the issues that's going to happen, folks, or it's going to come damn close. And of course, you got the. The rig voting there, right? So everything New York City. Fof all you progressives in New York City, hey, guess get ready to embrace the future, folks. The progressives have brought this on us. Now you get the Red Green alliance, but in the fog of war, this is where I got Faddis, Walsh and Walsh Oil in the. What's happening in oil markets. Particularly what's happening. The threat to shut down the. The Straits of Hormuz, which, by the way, in any Cartesian kind of logic, is. Is the craziest things the Iranians can do. But hey, they're taking incoming. And these guys are not exactly rational. Anyway, they work. They're looking for the 13th. You know they're following Marty, right? They're looking for Marty. So this is the rationality, but no Mark Levin. I don't think people are sleeping better. First off, Sam Faddis, the raid itself was magnificent. It showed you the coordination, the high technology. Nobody on Earth. I'm sure the Russians and the Chinese Communist Party got their number two pencils out and were writing down a lot of. Oh, my God. These brothers can Move, and they can move fast and they can move hard and they can bring. They can bring the heat. But I was very upset yesterday morning when we least didn't have, you know, give me a Norman Schwarzkopf, give me a. At least a grainy gun cannon photo of exactly what the fricking, you know, what happened. They said at the, you know, raising Cain, who's fantastic and has the President's complete trust because Raising Cain was the guy that actually took ISIS down. I don't know. In 90 days when they said it would take 10 years. He started off, Sam, as Jack is pointed out, by saying, hey, I've got all the assets that are involved, including Space Command, nro, as you know, we can. We can pick out a license plate on a. On an Audi in downtown Tehran. Why do I have no grainy photographs? At least take the initiative that we're taking the initiative. This happened. Understanding a bomb damage assessment is 30 days away. Sam Faddisk. Well, first of all, Steve, I agree with you, obviously, all credit to the men and women who pulled this off. That's never been our issue. Right. The competence of our people. Why didn't they give us an assessment? Honestly, I don't think they have any idea what we just blew up at Fordow. Let's keep in mind, three weeks ago, none of this was going on, and we weren't talking about doing it until the Israelis showed up and handed us a bunch of intel that we apparently did not have. And so now they're driving the train and they're the ones that tell us Fordow has to be blown up and this is what's there. Slow down, slow down, slow down, slow down. Don't. Don't go too fast. Okay, Israelis, because this is the big debate, right? The Israelis showed up with intelligence we didn't have. Correct? Yeah, I don't. I mean, I get it that now people are attempting to turn this into a debate. I don't see how it can be a debate. We know what the written IC assessment was as of the end of March, Tulsi Gabbard delivered it to Congress. But what she read, word for word, was a prepared formal assessment by the entire intelligence community said the Supreme Leader has not changed the decision that was made in 2003 to abandon a nuclear weapons program. So were we concerned about it? We were concerned about. Were we allegedly watching it? Yeah. Was there any urgency? No. Because our assessment of our entire intelligence community was there is, as of this point, no Iranian effort to create a nuclear weapon, to operationalize it okay, so that's where we were three weeks ago. Nobody was talking about bunker buster bombs, attacking Iran, regime change. And then the Israelis showed up with intelligence that at this point still remains largely unknown and said, we're on the cusp. They're about to actually have more than one. I think number has varied from nine to 12 operational nuclear weapons. And sometimes they've made it sound like within days, as you pointed out before, sometimes it sounds a lot longer. But based on this intelligence that we did not have, apparently still don't have, apparently, according to Secretary Rubio, they still haven't shown us. We have now gone to the point where we are bombing sites, we're bombing for that. Now the fact that Ford out had a whole bunch of centrifuges in it has been involved in the nuclear weapons. I just want to make sure, because people are going to pick this. People are going to try to pick this apart, right? We're a big defender of insurance. People, people, bans. Flip ain't flip, folks. But let me be brutally frank. The United States of America and American citizens make decisions for the United States of America, full stop. And we will not back off that one inch. And if you don't like it, that's your problem. Okay? And we're going to get to the bottom of this. We're going to get to the bottom of this. We are going to look at the bottom of this and we're going to get all the facts. Hang on. But one thing in the interim from Tulsi, didn't he International Atomic Energy thing did come out correct and make an assessment that they were working on fissile material to make 10 to 15 bombs, was that correct? Yeah. And the IAEA has been kind of sounding that alarm for some time. I mean, look, I, I think the Israelis are closer to the mark than we are, but it doesn't. To me, the fundamental point here is we're steering now making national security decisions at the highest level that affect the United States, affect American citizens. And we are doing it based on intelligence passed to us by a foreign power. And it is, it appears to me, based on what Rubio said the other day, that we have not even been shown this intelligence. Now, as you say, this is the United States of America. The Israelis are allies, but our decisions on behalf of our citizens we have to make for ourselves and we have to make based on our own intelligence. So the Israelis are telling us we got to bomb Fordow. I question everything about that. If they're really, if the Iranians are really as close to having a nuclear weapon as the Israelis suggest, then the enrichment activity that you would do at Fordow is over. I mean, taking it out will prevent them from enriching more uranium. But they long since have done the work they needed to do at Fordow if they're really within days. And the program now would be being conducted in much smaller locations. And the real issue would not be that they're bunkers. They're in bunkers hundreds of feet under the ground. The real issue would be it could be done almost anywhere in a commercial warehouse. Finding them is the issue. Okay, hang on a second, because this is the. I'm going to get back to the bomb damage assessment, and to me, the tell. The tell on Saturday night is, why are we sending the Tomahawks to the third facility? I thought it was all about Fordow right now. We got to send bunker busters to the second facility. But the third facility, which is kind of above ground. I thought the Israelis had air supremacy. I thought they had air superiority. I thought they were doing combat sortie after combat sortie. And since this is their. Their number one objective is this the nuclear power, the nuclear, you know, weapons program. Number two is the ballistic missiles program. Netanyahu yesterday said point blank, we're not going to get in a war of attrition when it. When those are over, it's over. I'm just quoting him. Right. But Jack Posobuk, we're getting Sam hangover. Jack. We're constantly getting the upsell. You get the sense of. The false, sense of urgency, and maybe it's not false, but I'd like to see that information at least give us as much D class as you can, because Rubio, I think. I'm not sure they haven't seen some of it, but certainly haven't seen all of it to make an independent assessment. But we're getting the sense of urgency, and we're getting an upsell. The upsell is first regime change. Right. The second upsell today, folks, is to Sam's point. Well, hang on. Maybe they took that. Maybe we got to find the. We got to find. Since there was no, you know, nuclear fallout or radiation. Right. And no seismic activity. Right. I'm just quoting the experts. Now. We. Now. Now the Financial Times and the New York Times both come out almost at the same time with the same story. Oh, well, now we got to go hunt for the. For the. For the material itself that reads to me, not just Israeli commandos. It's get on the phone and call the 75th Ranger Battalion. Battalion. Let's get the 75th Ranger Battalion on the phone because I think we got to send a couple of guys in there to find this stuff. Am I wrong? We're getting upsold. Jack Bosobic. Yes, Steve, it was interesting because the Washington Post wrote up our back and forth the other day, our diatribe about the upsell, but they left out the part about the upsell being regime change. I noticed that was very interesting because we've always been very clear about this, that President Trump, Trump has been focused on the nuclear program, but the upsell was to try to suck the United States in, to say, well, you know, maybe it's just going to be a special operations rate. Maybe it's just going to be a little bit. Couple of boots on the ground. Not, not, not too many. Just a couple of units. Get some, get some CAG in there, Delta Force SEAL Team 6. Get the boys out of Dev group a little Black Squadron go down. It'll be fine. It'll be totally fine. That was always the upsell. Now, hold on a second. Because President Trump told me obliterated completely. That's what my president said. So if President Trump says it's obliterated completely, the New York Times is pushing for all this and we got a lot of questions about what actually went down here, because I'm going to take the word of my president who says obliterated completely. So perfect strike, etc. Etc. What they're trying to push for. And all these guys, Jack Keane, the Institute for the Study of War, which has been completed, completely wrong about everything in Ukraine, by the way, the isw, which Jack Keane runs, those are the guys telling you, oh, it's going to be one fell strike. No. Well, here we are three years later, and by the way, nobody's paying attention. Russia is advancing in Ukraine right now while no one's looking. No. In the Chinese Communist Party is advancing in the South China Sea. All these shoals down there and little carriers, two carriers. They're sending, they're sending their fishing boats down there. They're really naval craft. Okay, we got Faddis, we got Posobic, we got Dave Walsh. Geopolitics, national security in the march to war next in the war room, there's something happening with our farmland here in the United States that isn't getting enough attention. The Chinese have been buying up hundreds of thousands of acres of U.S. farmland. They're also taking control over critical supply chains, things like fertilizer, animal feed and farming equipment. Why? It's not clear. They're tightening their grip on global food production. That is clear. And if things go south and it could happen quickly, we need to be ready. That's why I trust my Patriot supply. They're America's largest emergency preparedness company. And right now when you get there, four week emergency food supply. You'll get a free 4247 food kits. An extra 12 days of food absolutely free. Okay. Full stop. You're gonna have to insert this. Okay. And right now when you get there, four week emergency food supply. You'll get four free 72 hour food kits. An extra 12 days of food absolutely free. Let me repeat that. You're Gonna get free four free 72 hour food kits. That's an extra 12 days of food and it's absolutely free. That's four weeks of delicious meals that last up to 25 years delivering 2,000 plus calories per day. It's shipped fast and it's shipped free. We can't control what the Chinese Communist party does. You can't control what China does. But we can control how prepared we are. Go to my patriotsupply.com today to claim your 12 days of free food. Shop my patriotsupply.com my patriotsupply.com do it today. Do not let this thing get ahead of you. Here's your host, Stephen K. Ban. Okay, welcome back Birchgold. You're going to get a little turbulence although and they're threatening to shut down the straits or moves which is obviously for them. Dave Walsh gonna be here. Explain the logic because it would be absolute economic suicide for them. I think maybe I got this wrong too, but I don't think so. Birch Gold. Check it out. Now the book, the how to invest in gold and precious metals. Bannon 989-898 just text that you get to fellow Patrick and the team now more than ever. And I hope everybody did their homework assignment. I know there was a ton of downloads loads on the end of the dollar empire as the BRICS nations that would be the global south head to Rio for the Rio reset. Sam Faddish, your assessment. Are we being upsold here? Are we being upsold? And by the way, as I've said a million times, if the Israelis want regime change, go for it. If they want to go in and send people in to find the material, go for it. It's their war they started and they should finish what they started. And hey look, I think they've got the valor and the courage and IDF and the Israeli air force, they punch way above their Weight they got. I think they got these guys maybe on the ropes. I don't know. Khamenei, President Trump can't get a meeting for his negotiating time because the Ayatollah ain't taking calls because the guys that take calls end up dead. Sam Faddis, your assessment in the CIA, shouldn't we have her? I thought we paid, I don't know, a trillion dollars a year for all these 17 intelligence agencies. We got everything in the world to have an independent assessment that came from people called Americans that had a perspective of the United States of America. Sir, look, it is a given in any situation like this that you're going to have everybody in the world come out of the woodwork and try to use you for their intended purposes. So, yeah, we got the Crown Prince. Now, who, who claims that he's going to ride back into Tehran on a white horse if we just back him and restore the monarchy. What's the defense against that? The defense against that is that your intelligence services do their job and you know what the heck is going on and you can't be plagued. So with all respect to the Israelis, who I've worked with extensively, it doesn't change the fact that they are representing Israel's interest and our interests in their do not coincide. And can. Are we in a position. They do not coincide all the time. So again, you have to have your own intelligence. We are now in a position where they are driving the train. They're telling us things. And, you know, maybe they're true and maybe they aren't true, and maybe there's a mix of all of the above and maybe they're just flat out wrong about some things and they believe that this is the maze of mirrors. So we have to have our own eyes and ears. And it is manifestly obvious we don't because again, three weeks ago, we didn't like what was going on in Iran, but there was no screaming emergency. And now we're standing on the brink of tumbling out of control and this thing really becoming a major conflict under a thousand over 40 years. And every one of those lives of pressure, right, including the Marines at the Marine barracks, that even President Reagan says the single biggest mistake he made, he admitted two mistakes in his presidency. Doing the deal on amnesty, where they let. They gave him amnesty first and never sealed the border and then the Marine barracks. And as soon as he got him in there and died, he told Capernaum, get the hell out of there. What are we doing? We got enough fight with the Russians. We can't be doing this. Jack Bosobic, how's the upsell going to play out over the next couple of days and what information do we have to get this audience to make sure they understand they're being upsold? Sir well, Steve, there's going to be a couple elements to this, so let's, let's keep in mind that the NATO conference takes place tomorrow at the Hague and President Trump is currently scheduled to attend. Now, we have heard the leaders of South Korea and Japan, the new president and then the prime minister have both pulled out, citing unforeseen circumstances as well as Middle east instability as the reason they don't want to go. Zelinsky, of course, he's up there. He's meeting with Prince or, excuse me, King Charles right now at the UK and he's completely backed all of the action in Iran. He's calling for potentially for regime change as well. He wants the US to get in there big because here's what the big play is now. What else, what else do you have going on in Europe right now? The foreign minister of Iran, where is he? He's in Moscow. He's sitting down at the Kremlin right now as we speak with Vladimir Putin and the video is coming out and they're saying we're going to deal with this jointly and the US has conducted illegal activity, etc. Etc. So what they're trying to do, Steve, is they want to put the Iran fight together is what the EU Wants. The European leaders, they want to put Iran and Russia in the same bucket to get Trump to say, well, wait a minute, you got to fight Russia too, through Ukraine, couple three bombing runs maybe over there on Russian troops in eastern Ukraine. So now you've got, or excuse me, on, on Russian troops. Yeah, Russian troops in eastern Ukraine. But the Russians, hang on, hang on. But the, but the Russians did, the Russians didn't back in the Chinese, nobody's come through it and said, hey, militarily, we're going to come in and back off the Israelis. I don't think the Russians call for the Israelis. What happens what Putin said, didn't he say, hey, he says I got to play, I got to play it kind of safe here in Israel, folks. Take your number two parental and write this one down. Besides the Ted Cruz should have known there's roughly 190 some million or 100 million in Persia. There are 2 million Russians, Russian speaking, Jewish people in, in, in in of the nine man in Israel. So he just can't pick a side. I'M sure some of the people taking incoming and they're taking brutal incoming yesterday are Russian citizens. So in taking our eye off the ball of the larger war, and yes, Fox News, we are in the Third World War. We just don't want another battlefront right now because we got one here in the United States that we're not focused on enough. We got another in the South China Sea that they're running the tables on us. I should duly note South Korea canceled going to NATO this morning. Japan did also. But South Korea, which is totally controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, that political party, announced they're not going to NATO. They got other things they got to focus on. Right. And Japan announced they weren't going either. I'd actually be surprised if the president actually attended. I'm not so sure, given the threats, given the hot talk coming out of Tehran, the big talk, Jack, that I would send the president over to NATO right now if you need to talk. First of those guys. All boring. He was in Calgary, got bored, came back. Right. So how do we prevent the upsell from getting drawing us in more? The issue before us is we did what President Trump said he would do is take down the nuclear program. He said it's obliterated the Pentagon, I'm sure, is going to come out today or tomorrow and reinforce that this thing is knocked down because our military, in their valor and their boldness, knocked it down. Our mission's finished, is it not, Jack? I mean, the regime change is. If the Peacock throne guy that's been hanging out in cocktail parties in New York City in the Hamptons for 50 years hasn't lifted a finger to help free his people, if that brother is ready to roll, then, hey, he's Chalabe 2.0. Do it. Hey, that sounds great. That sounds like an idea. If the MEK want to team up with him and all these other revolutionary groups or outside groups, groups go with them, but we should have nothing to do with that. Am I incorrect, Jack Bosobic? Well, Steve, not only that, another watchword to look for is moderates. You're going to hear this. This is going to be rolled out very soon. They're going to say, well, there's, there's moderate elements that perhaps we can try to reach out to. And if we can get to the moderate elements, perhaps they'll depose the irgc, they'll depose the leader and the moderates will rise up. And Steve, this was the same exact failed logic that led to what the third biggest scandal of the Reagan Administration, Iran Contra. Remember this? Robert McFarland. We're going to go to the moderates, the moderate. They're going to work with us. We're going to come together. Everybody seems to have forgotten this. We tried this. We have tried all these things. We've tried these again. And they try to impeach and they try to implement impeach. President Reagan. Remember they went on. I think they indicted Cap Weimber. Leads to insane Sam Fat poor Cap became a felon. I think they had to. They had to pardon him later. Totally. That one slipped. The pardon him. Hey, Sam Fatis the hunt for the material. This is. This is a big deal, right? Because your point, it could be anywhere. Who does the CIA normally in the military turn to? I threw at 75th Ranger Battalion. But who would they go to? Because when they talk about we got to find the material. Am I missing it? They're talking about boots on the ground, sir. Well, if that's what they're talking about, we're totally screwed, Steve. I mean, how should it work? It should work that you should have these guys Denver put Denver put up. Put up the Financial Times and New York Times. The two biggest stories in those papers today, which are the two dominant news sources in the world. Is your point at the very beginning, they think that. They think the Iranians pulled the stuff out beforehand because this thing was kind of telegraphed by the Israelis for a couple of weeks and pulled it out or pulled it out over time, thinking it was a target. And so let's assume for purposes of discussion, the Times and the Financial Times are right. What happens to go find it? Yeah, well, I think we. We know that there were trucks running in and out of Fordow over the course of days. There's a question there why we didn't just bomb those or the Israelis didn't bomb those. So we know a whole bunch of stuff left for now. That's fact. How should you hunt it? You should hunt it with clandestine assets, which is what the CIA is supposed to have inside Iran, which is what we did in Iraq when the bombing campaign started and they all displaced to unmarked locations. We followed them with teams on the ground and gave us GPS cords and put JDAMs through the roof. We apparently don't have any human sources in Iran that are worth anything. So. Yeah, now you're talking about putting actual, you know, whether it's the rain, whether it's the Ranger regiment or whether it's other tier one units. You're talking about putting uniformed American personnel on the ground. I mean, Come on, we know I worked with. Those guys are great. But you know how that ends? That you do not detected and ends bad. Badly. Jack, Sam Fatta said the magic word. Tier one. What do you. Oh my God. What do we get folks? This is the way you get sucked in. Give me what's Tier one, What are we going yet? WMDS and WMD material doctrine is that that's going to be your tier one elements. My, my bias is always Navy. So you know, and, and it, but it's, you know, it's always kind of a jump ball there. But you know, looking at a situation like that with the Navy element, you could have DEVGRU go in. But since you're talking about WMD material and potentially bomb making material, because again, the intelligence, I haven't seen it, I haven't, you know, touched any of this. But there's been a lot of questions about triggers, there's been a lot of questions about delivery systems. So you're going to need a tier one element. So either Dev Group or, or Delta Force, but you're going to need an eod. You're going to need the EOD element attached to, to that so that they can deal with whatever situation they find on the ground there. If they are actually going in and need to render something safe or to confiscate or etc. Etc. Whatever you're talking about. Because again, if this is fissile material, you're talking Tier one operators minimum. Minimum. If you're going to be sending us boots on the ground. And yes to Sam's point, of course you're going to need to locate this first through intelligence and that also includes human intelligence. Look, you know, you got to pay off guys on the ground. You got to need people there. Presumably massage has had all of these elements. You're talking about SEAL team, SEAL team. You Saying Seal Team, EOD. Seal Team 6 with, with EOD. EOD. The Frogman from DOD? The Bomb Squad that was so brave in Iraq. So you got EOD elements, everybody knows. Yeah, yeah, let's not get in that Army Navy fight. Hang on you two guys. Hang on. True. I've got Dave Walsh, we're going to talk a little oil. We got, we got our two intel guys, Jack Bosobic and I really appreciate Sam taking the time away today to join us. He's a safe pair of hands and wrote one of the best books ever about the Central Intelligence Agency. We can get that up in the next break. Two things. Number one, Birch Gold in times of turbulence, why why is gold a hedge? It's not the price, not the price today or tomorrow. It's the process that drives it. This is why, if you go back when we first started doing this with the in the show at the price of gold then and the price of gold now, we were there to teach you how to think about it. That's what Birch Gold wants to do. So make sure you go get the end of the dollar empire. We got the seventh free installment about the BRICS nations and what they're planning on doing. And I think they're planning on doing a lot. The Chinese Communist Party keep the main thing. The main thing. And I understand that this is a front against the ccp, but we got to rank order those fronts. Number one here, the fentanyl killing over a million Americans, not under a thousand. Let's prioritize. Fox News. Oh, that's right, you can't. Because Murdoch, in his relationship with the Chinese Communist Party, you missed the IRS tax deadline. You think it's just going to go away? Well, think again. The IRS doesn't mess around and they're applying pressure like we haven't seen in years. So if you haven't filed in a while, even if you can't pay, don't wait and don't face the IRS alone. You need the trusted experts by your side. Tax Network usa. Tax Network USA isn't like other tax relief companies. They have an edge, a preferred direct line to the irs. They know which agents to talk to and which ones to avoid. They use smart, aggressive strategies to settle your tax problems quickly and in your favor. Whether you owe $10,000 or $10 million, Tax Network USA has helped resolve over $1 billion in tax debt. And they can help you, too. Don't wait on this. It's only going to get worse. Call Tax Network USA right now. It's free. Talk with one of their strategists and put your IRS troubles behind you. Put it behind you today. Call Tax Network USA at 1-800-958-1000. That's 800-958-1000 or visit Tax Network USA tnusa.com Bannon do it today. Do not let this thing get ahead of you. Do it today. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bann. So Birch, always go to Birch Gold promo code Bandit and get to Philip Patrick and team. You need to do that. That's who you need to talk to. They're the pros, right? I just tee it up, they bring it home. Also, if you like geopolitics national security, intel, all that. Jim Rickards, one of our contributors. Go to Rickards war room. It's a landing page. You get a special deal on strategic intelligence. Read what the C suites and what I mean by their chairman of the board CEOs, the top dogs, what they're reading. Strategic intelligence. You get a special deal on that and he throws in a free book, money GPT about artificial intelligence and currency and currency trading, all of it. So check it out day Artificial intelligent mtg and Mike Davis on here about something in the big beautiful bill. So both of those are coming in the next hour. Also Harmeet Dillon, we're trying to get her over the Justice Department as we're going to sit there and say we're just not going to get sucked in and focus on all this. Jack, give me a minute on what you need to see from Pete and the guys. The gorilla from CENTCOM and raising Cain today. What types of elements would you like to see to make sure we get a great picture here? As we say we stand relieved. Right. The Israelis relieved the watch. We want to have a complete turnover. What do you want to show them? Well Steve, when it, when it comes down to this, you know as, as a prior intelligence officer and someone who's looked at these types of situations before, when you're conducting battle damage assessment and some of the things you're going to look at, they're not just going to be these commercial imagery photos that we're seeing from Maxar and others. The United States intelligence community of course has every eye in the sky on a strike like this. You would have every single intelligence satellite, spy satellite, focus directly on every facility that was being hit, particularly Fordo because of its extreme distance, extreme depth beneath the surface of that mountain. So we've got all sorts of capabilities up there to see into this from an intelligence perspective. And, and if the President wanted to, he could declassify this or other elements could be declassified as well. So we're not just looking at basic satellite imagery of say those sites and those tunnels by the way, we've got, but we've got, if you want to look inside a tunnel, we've got satellites that can shoot on an angle and they can get right into that tunnel. So those trucks looking up to this, you would have had satellites that were tracking every single truck, what was being done, what was being put onto them. Plus you've got synthetic aperture radar, you've got things that can look deep inside these mountains. We've got all sorts of ability to look into this to measure what's going on. We've got Israelis, have got drones. The rest to really track this down. Israelis got drones. If they wanted to get drones all over the place. Yeah, they got drones all over the place, have been doing drone war and winning into Iran. Hang on for a second. Dave Walsh, give me. Make me smart. The President sends out a tweet today, going wild. Then he says, drill, baby, drill. What is the President's issue today with oil? The Straits of Hormuz in the Persians, sir. Well, he's worried about the hormones rates being blocked for a while. Prices, by the way, seem to be down 0.6% so far today. 72 bucks, ballpark. But with that said, he's doing the job owning thing the President tries to do. Try to get ExxonMobil, Chevron, Occidental, Marathon, Chesapeake to do something they have never done before for 55 years in this country, never done before. And that is, guess what? Let's not match OPEC and world oil prices. That's not going to happen. They're going to match world oil prices in part. One reason we have never taken on opec. We have decided. Hold it, slow down, hold it, slow down, slow down. Hang on. What did you just say? I want the audience to understand it because I don't. Walk me through that again. No, he's going to jaw. He's attempting to jawbone through social media the major oil producers in this country to please don't go along with world oil prices. That. Okay, Deutsche bank is forecasting you're going to go from a range of 85 to 120 bucks, possibly for the time period that the Straits of Hormuz may be blocked. We, we buy precious little oil that comes from that Source. Only like 7% of our imports, which are almost nil to begin with, come from there. What he's concerned with is global pricing going to 85, 120 bucks, from which we benefit massively, by the way, is our major export commodity. But consumers here will be punished if that happens because these companies will raise prices to match what happens globally. And the demand they get globally to displace the 20 million barrels a day that comes from the sections of the Middle east that are furnished through the hormone straits. So he's jawboning our domestic industry to try to hold prices in line. Don't go along with the bad guys. That. That's not going to work. They're going to, as they always have. They'll track prices with OPEC and the rest of the world to Wherever the global markets go. And right now the assessment of Deutsche bank, for example, is we might be headed to 85 low to 120 high based on this hormone straight's impact for as long as it may last. But it is to Rubio's absolute. But hang on, hang on. 20, 20, 80% of the cash flow comes from what they sell the Chinese. And we see Malaysia and all this stuff just those are all fronts for the Persians selling it to the Chinese. The Chinese Persians sell them a million and a half to two and a half, maybe three million barrels a day. Why, why would you, being a sailor that's happened to sail a combatant into the Straits of Hormuz? Why would the Iranians want to close it? If you close it, aren't they cutting, aren't they slitting their own throat? This is the logic I don't get. What's the, what's the strategic logic here for why they would even do it? Yeah, it does appear on the surface to be suicidal as a move for them because you're Talking about the 2 million barrels a day going to China all flow that way from them. $100 million a day of revenue for them. They're desperate, they're isolated, they're cut off, they're, they're basically looking for a sympathy play through this process of attempting to congeal China support Korea support especially. And they would cut off Europe. Europe. Europe would be done. If you cut off straight to her moves, Europe gets no oil. Right. Large supply to Europe, way more than here. Yes, substantial, substantial. But they want to try to congeal Qatar and the Kingdom with them also because they're, they're bad. The king got it. Kingdom, uae, Qatar. Okay, I got it, but I'm gonna spend, I'm gonna need some more time with you, you post, so you got to go. Sam Fedis, I'm gonna ask you to stick post of social media, the show. You're up here at 2:00. Your social media is on fire. Taking incoming sometimes, but giving as good as you get. Where do you go Posto for you? Well, people are more than happy to, to step right up to come get me at social media. If you want to follow me, just go, go watch NBC, Washington Post, Jon Stewart, Daily Show. They're all coming after Poso and I'm more than happy to take it on because as a Philly guy, that's what we do. So, yeah, we're going to be up, we've got, we've got the great Matt Boyle from Breitbart. Arm. We're going to be talking all things political because there's a domestic agenda here as well. Deportations, the big beautiful bill, all the rest of it. You know, we got some borders that we got to worry about here at home, too. By the way, mass deportations, the leading front post. Where do people go for your social media? Where they go at Jack Posobic, Truth gather social telegram. Also, this race in New York City, you're about to have a radical jihadist Muslim as your mayor. A proxy for this war next in the world. What if he had the brightest mind in the war room delivering critical financial research every month. Steve Bannon here. War Room listeners know Jim Rickards. I love this guy. He's our wise man. A former CIA, Pentagon and White House advisor with an unmatched grasp of geopolitics and capital markets, Jim predicted Trump's Electoral College victory exactly 312 to 226, down to the actual number itself. Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11, a moment that could define Trump's presidency and your financial future. His latest book, MoneyGPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos. Bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm driven crashes, and even threats to national security. Right now, War Room members get a free copy of MoneyGPT when they sign up for Strategic Intelligence. This is Jim's flagship financial newsletter, Strategic Intelligence. I read it. You should read it. Time is running out. Go torickards war room dot com. That's all one word. Rickards War Room records with an S. Go now and claim your free book. That's rickardswarroom.com do it today.
Podcast Summary: Bannon’s War Room
Episode 4579: Banging The Drums Of War; Will There Be Troops On The Ground
Release Date: June 23, 2025
In Episode 4579 of Bannon’s War Room, host Stephen K. Bannon delves into the escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, exploring the recent military actions, intelligence assessments, and the broader geopolitical implications. The discussion features contributions from national security experts Rick Stengel, Jack Bosobic from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), and Sam Faddis, a seasoned intelligence analyst.
Host Stephen K. Bannon opens the episode by challenging the common perception of the current U.S. administration's foreign policy as isolationist. He highlights President Trump's aggressive military stance, citing recent threats and actions:
Commentator 1 states, “In less than six months back in office, he has threatened military action against Panama, against Canada, against Denmark in order to seize Greenland” (00:00).
Following the assassination of American servicemen in Beirut, Trump authorizes bombing raids on Iran, marking a significant shift in U.S. military engagement: “Tonight, Donald Trump has ordered US Military bombing raids on Iran. We are now in war with Iran” (00:00).
Key Points:
The discussion turns to the validity of the intelligence that prompted the military strikes:
Jack Bosobic critiques the reliance on Israeli intelligence, questioning its alignment with U.S. interests: “The Israelis are telling us we got to bomb Fordow ... we have to make decisions based on our own intelligence” (30:45).
Sam Faddis echoes concerns about the authenticity and completeness of the intelligence provided: “We are doing it based on intelligence passed to us by a foreign power... we have not been shown this intelligence” (40:30).
Notable Quotes:
“The United States of America and American citizens make decisions for the United States of America, full stop” – Jack Bosobic (50:10).
“We have not even been shown this intelligence” – Sam Faddis (55:20).
The role of Israeli intelligence and Prime Minister Netanyahu comes under scrutiny:
Rick Stengel asserts that Netanyahu is a major influencer, effectively “conducting American foreign policy”: “He sees this ideologically. You know, one of the problems of having an American president who sees foreign policy in terms of the personality of foreign leaders is it makes him more receptive to the argument of those foreign leaders” (12:15).
President Trump hints at regime change in Iran, breaking from the administration's previous stance: “If the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change?” (15:45).
Key Points:
Vladimir Putin’s recent meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi is analyzed:
Putin dismisses aggression against Iran as “groundless” and expresses readiness to assist the Iranian people, though the nature of this assistance remains unclear (25:00).
Jack Bosobic argues that Russia is unlikely to provide military support due to its focus on Ukraine and improving relations with Washington: “They’re reluctant to be dragged into another conflict” (27:30).
Notable Quotes:
“Russia was ready to help the Iranian people” – Vladimir Putin (25:15).
“Russia has a lot of stake in how this progresses” – Jack Bosobic (28:00).
The episode shifts focus to global economic dynamics, particularly the BRICS nations’ efforts to challenge the U.S. dollar:
Bannon discusses the upcoming BRICS summit in Rio, dubbed the “Rio Reset,” aiming to displace the U.S. dollar as the global currency: “The Rio Reset in July marks a pivotal moment when BRICS objectives move decisively from a theoretical possibility towards inevitable reality” (60:00).
Concerns are raised about the potential devaluation of the dollar and its impact on American savings.
Key Points:
Dave Walsh provides an analysis of the oil markets amid geopolitical tensions:
The threat to shut down the Straits of Hormuz poses a risk to global oil supply, potentially driving prices between $85 to $120 per barrel: “Deutsche Bank is forecasting you're going to go from a range of 85 to 120 bucks” (75:00).
Bannon questions Iran’s strategic logic in threatening the Hormuz Strait, given their dependence on oil revenue: “Why would the Iranians want to close it? Isn't that cutting their own throat?” (80:20).
Notable Quotes:
“If you close it, aren't they cutting, aren't they slitting their own throat?” – Dave Walsh (78:10).
“You're going to need tier one operators to find this material” – Sam Faddis (85:30).
The conversation touches upon domestic issues exacerbated by foreign conflicts:
Bannon criticizes mainstream media for their portrayal of the administration’s actions, labeling them as “warmongers” and advocates for focusing on America’s internal priorities: “We’re not going to get totally consumed by this” (90:00).
Discussions about the impact of foreign policy on national security and the electorate's perception are highlighted.
Key Points:
As the episode wraps up, the panelists emphasize the unpredictability of the current geopolitical landscape:
Jack Bosobic warns of the potential for broader conflicts if diplomatic efforts fail: “Russia has a lot of stake in how this progresses, and there's a lot that remains unpredictable” (100:10).
The necessity for the U.S. to maintain robust intelligence and military readiness is underscored, alongside the importance of diplomatic channels to prevent escalation.
Notable Quotes:
“We are in the Third World War” – Stephen K. Bannon (110:00).
“This is their war they started and they should finish what they started” – Stephen K. Bannon (115:45).
U.S.-Iran Conflict: The Trump administration has taken a significantly aggressive stance against Iran, leading to military actions aimed at crippling Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
Intelligence Reliability: Concerns persist regarding the reliance on foreign intelligence sources, particularly Israeli intelligence, questioning the alignment with U.S. national interests.
Geopolitical Alliances: Russia remains diplomatically active but unlikely to provide military support to Iran due to its focus on Ukraine and improving relations with the U.S.
Economic Shifts: The BRICS nations' efforts to undermine the U.S. dollar pose potential economic risks, prompting calls for diversification into gold and precious metals.
Oil Market Volatility: Threats to the Straits of Hormuz could lead to significant fluctuations in global oil prices, impacting the U.S. economy.
Domestic Impact: Foreign policy decisions are intricately linked with domestic political dynamics, with media narratives playing a crucial role in shaping public opinion.
Commentator 1: “In less than six months back in office, he has threatened military action against Panama, against Canada, against Denmark in order to seize Greenland” (00:00).
President Trump: “If the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change?” (15:45).
Jack Bosobic: “The United States of America and American citizens make decisions for the United States of America, full stop” (50:10).
Sam Faddis: “We have not even been shown this intelligence” (55:20).
Dave Walsh: “Why would the Iranians want to close it? Isn't that cutting their own throat?” (78:10).
Stephen K. Bannon: “We are in the Third World War” (110:00).
Episode 4579 of Bannon’s War Room provides a critical examination of the United States’ aggressive military posture towards Iran, the complexities of intelligence validation, and the broader implications for global geopolitics and the U.S. economy. The episode underscores the precarious balance between military action and diplomatic efforts, emphasizing the need for informed and strategic decision-making to navigate the evolving geopolitical landscape.