Stephen K. Bannon (33:00)
Do it today. Here's your host, Stephen K. Ban. Okay, I want to connect some dots here on geopolitics, geoeconomics, capital markets and you, the war and posse and some turbulence that may be going on today. Now I've got Cleo Pascal is in the Pacific. She's going to join us. Come back in a moment. We've got Noor Bin Laden in Switzerland who covers Davos for us. You know, every year what Scott Besson said in the turmoil in the capital markets today, the bond and stock market particularly, and of course precious metals on a tear as Scott said. Look, part of that may be this whole what Ray Dalio is talking about and this whole issue about a geopolitical Realignment and particularly letting the Europeans know, hey, look, we just can't, we're not going to do anymore. We're not going to pay for your title defense, your entire defense. The elites in Europe have to understand you got to get to 5%. But even more in getting into 5% is the seriousness of what you take. These threats now that goes from Canada and the Arctic, in Greenland and the, you know, the Greenland, Iceland, UK gap about the situation with Russian submarines, all of it. But it also goes as we've banged the drum on this show for months and months and months because we knew this day was going to come where people internally, they've been talking about a lot. And President Trump has another geopolitical and geostrategic necessity is this atoll or this little island in the middle of the Indian Ocean that has been quite strategic for the British and then for the Americans for, I don't know, over 100 years. That is Diego Garcia, right? And particularly when you're taking a carrier battle group, a carrier strike group, I think they call it now, from the South China Sea, where it's on patrol in defense of Taiwan and free trade and the passage, you know, free passage of cargo, right, to the Straits of Malacca to cross the Indian Ocean past Diego see, to the North Arabian Sea to be available in case there is any need for it in this situation in Tehran. The third part of that is what Scott Besson said. He said, hey, don't, don't, don't lose sight of the issue about Japan. He says mostly he thinks reaction is about the situation with Japan and particularly Japan's finances. And Japan ought to be a cautionary tale for the United States. Back in the late 18 1980s, early 1990s had a massive asset bubble, particularly around real assets, real estate. Remember, at one time, people thought Japan was going to own the world. They were buying Tiffany's. They were buying every building in the United States. I think it was the bank of Japan's lobby. It was one time valued at four or five billion dollars. Just the real estate value in central Tokyo. What you've had is you have a prime minister there. She's quite energetic. She's a real partner with President Trump. Geopolitically, she's quite strongly anti ccp. They've had this thing called the lost decades because of the implosion of their economy around this asset bubble collapsing in the late 80s, early 90s. And they everything they've tried to do struggle through, they've lost decade after decade after decade of being a manufacturing superpower and being a dominant player in the world economy. Well, she's got a new economic plan, but most importantly, she's calling a snap election. You can do that in their system, in the parliamentary system. And the reason is she's got tremendous momentum because guess what, people in Japan like her energy. They like the cut of her jib. They particularly like the fact that the Japanese elites are publicly waking up to the fact that the Chinese Communist Party, not just in the South China Sea but in the East China Sea, is a strategic threat to the people of Japan. No more just, you know, talking about North Korea. This is one of the big things that we did in the first days of President Trump's first term, particularly in the transition. This whole thing with Obama, this obsession with Korea, which it should be, but Korea's a vassal state to the Chinese Communist Party. They're the enemy. And so those three nodes, both what's happening in Japan with a closer strategic realignment to the United States via this amazing young prime minister, they have female what's happening in Diego Garcia and the Central Indian Ocean with that as a strategic asset. And clearly what's happening in Greenland. And not just in Greenland, don't forget the Mack Daddy that is northern Canada, from Alaska to all the way to Greenland and across Northern Canada. That part of the Arctic is the new great game. And that is where the vulnerability of the west really comes out, because China and Russia are all over it. Cleo Pascal, with that as a tee up. You have warned about this and you've done a brilliant job of getting analysis out there, taking clips from war room. And you've warned, don't miss. What the British are talking about is like Mauritius and the people and the indigenous people. And what we're doing, they, they are, they're consciously obfuscating what the issue is here. The issue is that through one belt, one road and other predatory capitalist studs, you know, predatory capital, capital and kind of the British East India Company model in reverse. This is a client state. Mauritius is a client state of the Chinese Communist Party. And you're basically turning over a key naval asset at the very moment when President Trump's Mahanian strategy, Mahanian strategy is coming ever more, ever clearer that the choke points. And what Mahan said is the key to global power. A navy that can keep the seven seas free, but also can deploy everywhere is now at the forefront of everybody's mind. And it's not lost in President Trump that the British government is just giving away to the Chinese Communist Party one of the most strategic assets in the world. Your thoughts, ma'? Am?