← Bannon`s War Room
Bannon`s War Room
WarRoom Battleground EP 1044: BRUTAL: “Birmingham Antifa” Goons Call Harnwell “A Recently Exhumed corpse” In Savage Attack
WarRoom Battleground EP 1044: BRUTAL: “Birmingham Antifa” Goons Call Harnwell “A Recently Exhumed corpse” In Savage Attack...
Loading summary
Transcript46 lines
- [00:00]
Steve Bannon
Sam. This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going
- [00:34]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
medieval on these people.
- [00:37]
Steve Bannon
There's not got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. The people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen.
- [00:48]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
And where do people like that go
- [00:50]
Steve Bannon
to share the big lie? MAGA MEDIA I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience. Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved. War Room here's your host, Stephen K. Band.
- [01:18]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Friday 3rd of July Anno Domini 2,026 Harnwell here at the helm on Steve Bannon's War Room. I'm going to explain what that cold open was, but not immediately. I've got something else, an announcement that I will start the show with today. Regular viewers will know that we have on the show quite frequently a beloved figure in the English patriotic nationalist movement, Ryan Bridge, co founder of Raise the Colors. This is the organization that's going round the UK where it's not legally suppressed from doing so and simply raising the, the, the English flag, the flag of St. George for which he has been arrested and suffered all sorts of ignominy. Right. And as befits a patriot, he therefore comes under attack quite regularly. On this occasion here then, if you wouldn't mind popping up that graphic on the screen for me, quite an appalling, brutal, savage attack by an organization calling themselves Birmingham Anti Fascists. Of course their tactics are every bit from the fascist playbook and I just want to say to these guys because the, the issue here was that there was somebody in erase the colors T shirt causing some problems. And Ryan Bridge said he had no idea who this guy was at an event and had suggested on the War Room that this was simply an infiltrator, an antifa infiltrator who'd bought the merch and doing the usual stuff that antifa does. And we'll get on to that later in the show as well. I just want to say to these guys that call themselves Birmingham Anti Fascist, you guys, you know, you can do what you want, you can sort of insult people however you like, but you are losing the battle. You are losing public opinion, you are losing the people. The public in the uk, they are slipping away from you, no longer subjected to all the Nonsense that you guys are constantly pushing out. And the change is coming. That's all I want to say to you. I'm not going to descend down to your abusive level. You are losing the battle. The invaders who have broken in to Great Britain are going to leave. You are going to see them get back on their little boats and go back over the English Channel to France and then beyond to their own countrylands. That is going to happen. And you can cry about it, you can insult people, whatever you want to do. That was just a message for Birmingham antifascists. They gave us a little love tap. I thought I would give them one back. And if, by the way, you are interested in legitimately taking some merch and supporting raise the colors, I will. I promise you this one day when we next have Ryan on, I will put on an RTC shirt for that. There are few organizations in the UK that I have as much time and respect for as razor colors go to. Go to raisethecolorsofficial.com and throw them some help. They're doing great work. Okay, so on with the show. What was that we had in the. The cold open just before the opening credits? That was. That took place in the European Parliament a couple of weeks ago. And the chanting you could hear there were the words send them back. And they're talking. They just passed a returns bill in the European Parliament. Huge majority, numerical majority. And so the right was shouting, send them back. And the left was shouting, shame what I would say about that. And I have my reasons to believe that this is somewhat of a performative exercise. And one of those reasons is that the model that they're claiming they're basing this returns new returns policy on is based on the model established here in Italy by Prime Minister Georgia Maloney, known to the war room audience as Phony Maloney. Why do we. Why are we so harsh on her? Why do we call her phony? Well, this is a perfect example of why she spent over five years. 800 billion. Excuse me, 800 million euros. That's about $900 million to send back to. To centers, returns centers in Albania. What the government, the Italian government was saying would be amount to about 36,000 invaders per year. And in five years. And phoney Maloney this September will reach the landmark of the longest surviving Italian government since the Second World War, the foundation of the modern republic for those five years in power. What does she have to show for that? Having trumpeted 36,000 per year? 111. No, not 111,000. 111 invaders sent back for the grand total of 800 million euros. And you have no idea how many press releases we have had to suffer here in Italy as the government was trumpeting its seriousness, getting to grips with the invasion issue. That's why I have a slight suspicion that this European Parliament initiative is going to produce much. With me to discuss that, break this down, is Olivier Beau, who's the director of communications for Order. Yours again, one of my favorite organizations. Very happy to have spoken there in Warsaw a couple of years ago. Olivier, welcome back onto the show. You guys were quite pathetic, actually, because you hosted the Polish translation of a report, I think, back in February that was actually written by our friends over at the Matthias Corinus College and the mcc, that great organization that was supported very, very, very heavily by, by Viktor Orban when he was in power, they produced a report. You hosted the production of the Polish version. And this was somewhat prophetic, not only anticipating the vote in the European Parliament last week, but also I think you went far more structurally into this and said, hang on, guys. You know, this, as I say, is a report produced in sort of. You were associated with it with mcc, but I'll say you in this case, because you worked on the, you oversaw the Polish translation and you said, hang on, guys, hang on. Right. Actually, we ought not be looking so much to the European Union, to the European Commission, even to the European Parliament to resolve this issue, because the responsibility here never left the member states. Can you just say a bit more about that thesis because we're going to have to break this down and ask if that is the case, why have the member states been saying there's nothing we can do? Why is Giorgio Maloney be saying there's nothing we can do? It's all be. It's all Brussels responsibility. Tell us a bit about that report and then tell us the reaction to that because you guys have been pushing it quite hard. And then tell me what you think about this new returns policy as voted on in the European Parliament about two weeks ago.
- [10:05]
Olivier Beau
Yes, our organization, the Orthodox Institute, actually contributed to this report on the merits, but it was drafted by the MCC and the Hungarian Migration Research Institute. So what we're saying in this report is facts. It's that the migration policies have been taken over by Brussels by the European Union institutions by an evolution of the rules by adopting different directives and regulations. Although in the European treaties the. The main responsibility for migration policies rest in the nation states, which are members of the European Union. Another thing is that the Court of Justice of the European Union often publish issues, rules, rulings which are. Which go further than they should, as per the Treaty on the European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. An example, as you were talking about Mrs. Melanie's attempt at sending incoming illegal immigrants to Albania while their asylum requests are processed is a judgment by the, the Court of Justice of July last year, so a year ago, saying that any judge, I mean a court should be allowed to question the list of safe states which are issued by national governments. Now the member states have never transferred the competencies to the European Union to issue this kind of rulings, but this is what is happening. So the vote on June 17 in the European Parliament was to give legal grounds which would allow member states again to have those hubspots outside of the European Union.
- [12:35]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Okay, okay, let's synthesize this. So you're saying that in the treatise that established the legal basis of the. The European Union with its legal personality, migration policy is clearly a member states prerogative, right?
- [12:54]
Olivier Beau
Yeah.
- [12:54]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
If I understood what you were correcting, you then said the, the, the Court, the High Court, the, the Court of Justice of the European Union, which is the court that disciplines effectively the, the responsibilities and actions of the, of not only of the European Union, by the way, but also the member states that has interpreted more widely the Brussels prerogatives, giving Brussels more of a responsibility on migration, which is somewhat of a judicial usurpation. And then you're suggesting that this vote a couple of weeks ago in the European Parliament was a corrective measure underlining that it's the member states responsibility to be able to send migrants who have no legal basis in EU Back. Okay, please.
- [13:56]
Olivier Beau
It's more of a change of the EU rules to allow the member states to do what Mrs. Meloni was trying to do. So it's not a regulation that's bringing back the responsibility to the member states, but it changes the EU law so that as per EU law, the member states can do what Mrs. Meloni was trying to do.
- [14:22]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
So that can no longer be blocked by Brussels by saying, or presumably the European. The Court of justice of the European Union. My question to you now is, is there any mechanism where the EU CJ can actually come back and say that this vote in the European Parliament is invalid?
- [14:46]
Olivier Beau
It can't do so. But the Court of Justice of the European Union is very creative when issuing rulings. And you also have the European Court of Human Rights, which is the court that rules on the issues that are linked to the European Convention. Of human rights is broader than the eu. However, in the European treaties, there is an obligation for EU countries to abide by the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights. So even if you change the rules at the EU level, you still have the problem of the ban on pushbacks and the ban on sending back migrants who are claiming for asylum.
- [15:41]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
And by pushbacks you mean the, the expulsion, the sending back of invaders out of the, out of the opinion member states. All right, okay. Of course, the, the, the European. For a largely American audience, I do want to make these distinctions. They're the lost on a lot of Europeans as well. The European Court of Human Rights whose judgments are binding on European Union member states. That European Court in Strasbourg is not a European Union court, even though now to join the European Union you must be a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights. It's a bit convoluted because, you know, it's a recognition of how the modern European Union came to be. But of course signing that convention is now obligatory for EU members. And what Olivier is saying is that even if the European Union Court of Justice, which is the highest court in the European union, like the U.S. supreme Court, even if that now recognizes the vote that took place in the European Parliament, that says quite clearly what Giorgia Maloney was trying to do in Italy of sending people back to these clearing centers in Albania, even if the European Union Court of Justice Said says that is legal, if the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg says no, no, you can't do that because that's against the invaders human rights, that would be a ruling that would be binding on European Union member states. That just goes to show what a convoluted mess we are in in the European Union and how our own judiciaries can act, act against the democratic will of, of, of, of the European peoples. And to some extent it is, I think the responsibility is at the governmental level because it's at that level that you had these signatories, for example, with the Dublin Treaty, which famously said that migrants can legally claim if they are free, fleeing war asylum in countries. But, but that's the next, the most, the nearest, stable and safe country that they arrive into after leaving their own war torn territory. And of course that's often used as a pre, pretext for allowing people to stay. But of course they've jumped over so many safe countries from getting from, I don't know, sub Saharan Africa all the way up into, in, into the UK for example. You know that you've gone through all of the safe countries in Africa and then you've gone through all the countries in the Mediterranean on upwards, which just shows you what a whole hoax is. But there is as much as we can criticize the institutional, the institutions of the European Union and courts which ostensibly exist to safeguard its citizens human rights, fundamentally. Olivier, I put the blame for this situation fair and square at the member states, national government level because it is convenient them for them to, for various reasons to promote pro invasion policies and say, oh, there's something we can do about it because our hands are tied over in Brussels and at the court level. So it's a whole, it's a whole mixture. But, but for organizations like Order Yoris, that, that's, that's why something's happening. Olivia, bear with me two minutes. I want to come back to you and then allow you to expand on your thesis up until the end of this segment. Folks, there are what, seven days precisely left if you want to take advantage of the special offer that Philip Patrick and his team have put together, especially to mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence tomorrow. And that is, they're giving out out a special 1oz commemorative special edition silver round. Not a coin. It's around. You know the difference by now. And when you've found out the difference, perhaps you can tell me that special court round is being given out with all qualifying purchases of $10,000 or more by Philip Patrick. He's made that available to you. And the background is, as I'm sure if anyone who's been following the Financial Times this week, price of gold right now is at an incredibly competitive price. You might want to buy the dip on this one last ten years, one ounce of gold, the spot price has increased from about $1200 up to $4500. That's, you know, just in 10 years. Similar gains might be anticipated over the next 10 years. If you want to get in on that conveyor belt, you really ought to be thinking now whilst gold is at its present competitive price. If you want to know if you never bought gold before, you never bought silver before, you want in on the action. Perhaps you're starting to feel a little bit of FOMO and you, you want to get there yourself, you want to have some of these gains yourself, but you've never bought gold before. You, you've always thought buying gold is for other people, but you are interested. You want to know what it means to have a physical IRA in gold, then speak to Philip Patrick. Just send the text Bannon B A n o n to 989-898 and just ask him say hey Philip, seen these ads on the war room. I'm not sure if it's for me, but tell me what the deal is and I'm sure when he's explained it it's going to be a lot more simple the practical practicalities than what it might seem if you've never done it before. That's the way with anything. If you've never done it before. It always sounds more difficult to do Bannon B A N O N to 989-898 to take advantage of this free special edition commemorative 250 anniversary silver 1 ounce round before July 10th. That's when the offer ends. All right, back to Olivier.
- [22:04]
Olivier Beau
So.
- [22:06]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
So we agree on the thesis here that the responsibility is with the member states. Just tell me then a bit more about how this report that you sort of worked on the translated in to Polish, released in Polish to huge fanfare. Lots of senior Polish politicians like Cyrus Volsi, whose name even I recognize and remember from from when I worked in the European Parliament. Big luminaries there. There was an important report just say what the fight just again the findings of this report once again because this fundamentally I think changes the level of the debate making sure that underlining that if member states were want to take with both hands control over the invasion crisis besetting their country they are they are fully entitled to do so. Just explain that thesis once again if you wouldn't mind. Olivier.
- [23:04]
Olivier Beau
Yes. First I'll add that it's also been translated into French by the NCC which is important news because it's probably France which is going to game to change the rules of the game next year if the election goes as the opinion polls forecast. So what you also have to remember additionally to the European Court of Human Rights you also have the Geneva Convention and its 1967 protocol which puts an obligation on all countries to to not send back people who ask for asylum, especially if they come from war torn countries, for example. So that blocks the whole possibility of member States to act. But then you have to remember that international treaties can be signed but you can withdraw from them. So there's such a possibility. So what we're saying in our report is we're giving 18 proposals for the re nationalization of the migration and asylum policies so that democratically elected governments will be accountable to their people for their actions. So first in the EU you have to introduce and remember that decisions are taken not only by the European population Parliament, but by the council of the EU where all the governors are represented. You have to introduce opt in and opt out rights like the ones Ireland and Denmark have for immigration policies. Countries which are under migratory pressure and can't get the European Union to actually should disapply EU law. And now it's important to make the distinction. The European Union is not the United States. It's not a federation. It has no army, no police of its own. So if a country refuses to apply a piece of EU law, nothing is going to happen. This is something governments can do.
- [25:20]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Just let me give me, because we've got like 90 seconds now until we have the hard out. Just give me 30 seconds. You mend you flagged up the Geneva Convention. One of the speakers at the launch of the Polish version actually said, came out and said, you know, we need to leave the, the, the Geneva Convention. Do you add your voice to that? Is it, is it now? Is the issue of the Geneva Convention meddling with the, with the rights of invaders so great now that it would make sense for certain member states to withdraw their signature from, from that document?
- [25:58]
Olivier Beau
Yes, exactly. It was expanded. It was made for World War II refugees when it was signed. And then in 1967, it was expanded to all refugees around the world. The situation was very different from now. So we have to withdraw from this protocol.
- [26:19]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Olivier Bo, as always, very, very grateful for you coming on the war. In 20 seconds, where do people go? To learn more about what you're putting out incredible stuff at Ordo Uris,
- [26:32]
Olivier Beau
you go to the Orderis Pl website, the English version, which is available on this website, and you write in the search engine Taking back control from Brussels or renationalization of my migration policies. And you will find this report with all the proposals there. We also have an infographic which summarizes that.
- [26:58]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Olivia Bowe, thank you very much. Catch up with you soon. God bless.
- [27:01]
Steve Bannon
Listen up, patriots. President Trump is dropping a $100 trillion bomb on the globalist. Jerome Powell's term has come to a close and he's installing a real America First Fed chair who will, according to Jim Rickards, slash rates and supercharge our reindustrialization. This is what one man is calling Trump's gift on America's 250th anniversary, unleashing a historic super cycle in American mining. Rare earths, uranium and gold. The same forces that turned $5,000 into over a million in less than five years during China's booms are hitting here now. Jim Rickards, the former CIA Pentagon And White House advisor has the battle plan. The gold royalty stock that could skyrocket in the next few years and the uranium power for AI. Don't miss this. Go to rickardswarroom.com now for a risk free trial of Rickards strategic intelligence. Get all five free reports for just 49 bucks. 90 days to test it. Love it. Or keep the research and get your money back. This is your shot patriots. America is rising. Make sure you participate once again. Rickardswarroom.com for your risk free 90 day trial. Do it and do it today. Buy gold and put some silver in your pocket. I know what you're thinking. Everything's expensive right now. How am I going to buy gold? Pull your head out of the sand. One thing you can control right now that doesn't cost you anything out of pocket is diversifying your retirement savings. Birch Gold Group will help you convert an old 401k from a previous employer or an IRA into a physical gold IRA. Let me repeat that. Birchgold will help you now convert an old 401k from a previous employer or an Iraq into a physical IRA in gold. You know something? That's a hedge against inflation. Listen to this. Right now, Birch Gold is going to give you a special America 2501 ounce silver round for every $10,000 you purchase by July 10th. Let me repeat this. With every $10,000 purchase you get a free 1 ounce silver round. America 250 commemoration a special. Think about this. Ten years ago an ounce of gold was about $1,200. Today it's around $4,500. Where will it be in ten years from now? Text Bannon B A N N O N 989898 to take advantage of free America 250 silver with qualifying purchase before the 10th of July. Again, text my name, Bannon B A N N O n to number 989898. Today, take advantage of this offer. With qualifying purchases, you get a silver round. A 1 oz silver round. Check it out. Qualifying purchase. You gotta do it before July 10th. Do it today.
- [30:08]
Erin Agashahi
Kill America's voice. Family.
- [30:09]
Steve Bannon
Are you on Getter yet?
- [30:11]
Olivier Beau
No. What are you waiting for? It's free, it's uncensored and it's where
- [30:15]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
all the biggest voices in conservative media are speaking out.
- [30:19]
Steve Bannon
Download the Getter app right now. So totally free. It's where I put up exclusively all of my content 24 hours a day. Want to know what Steve Bannon's thinking? Go to get her.
- [30:28]
Erin Agashahi
That's right. You can follow all of your favorites. Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk, Jack Posobi and so many more.
- [30:34]
Steve Bannon
Download the Getter app now, sign up
- [30:36]
Erin Agashahi
for free and be part of the new thing.
- [30:39]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Welcome back, folks. Every time we have Erin Agashahi on this show, it follows the same structure. We get him on and he'll talk about an article he wrote six months or a year ago that lays out exactly the theme that we're talking about today. And that's exactly how we're going to do it today as well. The War Room's prophet, Erin, welcome back onto the show. So let's start off in reverse order. We'll talk about what's taking place now and then we'll talk about your article, I think from December of 2025, which nails it pretty accurately. What, what, what's going on here? So Politico, which is by no means a rabid far right news site, by no means owned, of course, now German, owned by Axel Springer, has written this article warning folk effectively about the protests that are expected in airport in Thuringia tomorrow, tomorrow, tomorrow and, and Sunday this weekend, the annual, I think it's one of the annual conference for the AfD where all the activists get to come together, decide on policy issues collectively to decide on personnel issues as well. And here's the horrific figure. And if Politico is saying this, folks, one can be reasonably secure that trouble will take place. They're expecting 50,000 demonstrators of which in POLITICO's own words, 2,500 of them are left wing extremists. So this is going to be the far left rabble rousing antifa shock troops. That is, that's exactly what's going to be taking place now. And these figures are apparently provided by the German secret services and which is unusual. Now Erin might correct me and explain why this is because these are the same people who are trying, the same state organization which is trying to suppress the AfD as a political organization. They're now coming out saying there's going to be trouble in Thuringia this weekend. And in fact, the German security apparatus has upgraded its warning and said that what was originally their worst case hypothesis is now the one they're actually expecting to take place. So Erin, why don't you just give me five minutes, explain what's taking place in Erfurt this weekend, why it's important, why the protesters are building. And then after that, in the second half of this segment, we're gonna digest your article because you actually, in a very, your usual structured way, you actually digest, digest this and Draw the relationship, which I've never seen before, between the firewall and the role that these protests have in maintaining that firewall, which is crucially important for anyone understanding the precarious situation that Germany is in now. But first of all, what's expected to happen this weekend? And why is Politico and the German secret services coming out and telling everyone to pay attention to this?
- [34:24]
Erin Agashahi
So what takes place this weekend in Erfurt is a party assembly, which for your audience may be best compared to an rnc. An RNC takes place annually and you have decisions which are made on a rnc, a candidate is nominated. And the German democracy parties play probably a much bigger role legally than in the US because they are laws specifically regulating what parties need to do and what they, for instance, must not do. And having a party assembly is actually something which is mandated by the German law which is regulating political parties. So what the AFD is doing here is actually fulfilling its legal obligation to hold a party assembly. However, it is now a routine and part of the political theater that already, you know, many months before the party assembly takes place, you have developments in the German discourse, starting by mobilization efforts from churches which are left wing occupied, from unions which are taxpayer finded from certain politicians from left wing parties trying to mobilize against not only perfectly legal but legally mandated holding of the party assembly. And recently in the last two, three years, the protests, which are not really protests, they are attacks against AfD party assemblies are becoming very intense. We saw this last year during the formation of the youth wing of the AfD generation Deutschland, where you saw how so called protesters throwed actually wood on federal highways so that cars could not come to the area where the party assembly was taking place, police being attacked, actually politicians being attacked by these left wing operatives. And it is expected that you will have, not only in my words, not even in the words of conservative commentators, but you know, in the words of people which are in the center, like Politico, Civil War, like developments on Saturday and on Sunday. And there are so many things which you know, need to be discussed because they are very interesting in particular for your audience in the us. Just imagine the following. Imagine that you have an RNC taking place in Medicine School, Square Garden in New York City. And you have all over the city, on every avenue and on every street, blockades by left wing groups. You have left wing groups trying to blockade RFK, JFK Airport and LaGuardia. You have activists trying to blockade federal Interstate and highways. You have left wing groups trying to blockade supports in the city. Because this is what will happen in Erfurt, a German city, essentially for two days because a party which is currently the highest polling party in Germany is doing what it is legally required to do together freely. An entire city needs to be isolated like it was done, under lockdown situation. And Covid, that is the situation which we have here in Germany when the AfD just wants to gather freely and have a democratic event.
- [38:30]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
We'll talk about. You mentioned Covid. We're going to talk about that because you may. You mentioned that in your article. Just, just. But just. We'll do that in a couple of minutes. I just want to drill down on this point. What did these antifa activists? Paratroopers, stormtroopers. The antifa stormtroopers. Right. What do they hope to achieve by this display of finance and intimidation when as you say, the AFD is what, up 28 at the moment? Friedrich Mertz, the Chancellor is down on 22%. So the AfD are by far in a way that the most popular political force at the moment. What do the antifa think they are going to achieve? Correct me if I'm wrong, but they're out there planning that. They're planning up to 30 or so. The state authorities in Thuringia are expecting at least 30 or so roadblocks organized by the. By the antifa. They're planning on shutting the city down. Right. This is going to be absolutely.
- [39:33]
Erin Agashahi
Yes.
- [39:34]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Incredible. What do they hope to achieve by doing this?
- [39:38]
Erin Agashahi
Yes, I can just say that I know that, you know, in political commentate, if you comment on politics nowadays, you can maybe be too dramatic. I can only say that you cannot overestimate what is going on tomorrow and on Sunday in Erfurt, because if you would have only 20 blockade attempts, this would be even, you know, probably the best case scenario. It will be much worse. And I really hope nobody, I really hope nobody will suffer. You know, I hope that no AFD person who probably will be attacked and there will be unfortunately attacks on AfD politicians by left wing operatives. I hope that from a medical point of view there will be no harm done. You know, you asked me what they hope for. Let me reply in this way. They, the antifa operatives in Germany thinks that we are right now in the late 30s or in the beginning 30s of the Weimar Republic and the AfD is the Nazi Party essentially and Bjorn Hooker and Alice Weidel are, you know, kind of Adolf Hitler and they want to take over Germany. And one year after the AfD is elected into power, we will have Holocaust like you know developments here. This is in fact the result of many failures in German society. A failure of the education system in Germany, a failure on how political discourse was conducted in the last 20 years where everybody and everything which is conservative or right from the center is automatically equated to being fascist. So let me just say this last sentence because the antifa operatives are in my opinion the victims of a totally failed education system. A totally failed society which is not able to have a free and open discourse.
- [41:47]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Erin, you mentioned just now you go through the list of failures, but it's also a failure of those who have the constitutional authority to protect the values that the Constitution wants to protect. To protect those values.
- [42:01]
Olivier Beau
Right.
- [42:01]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
There's also that failure as well. The Constitution allows certain bodies no entrusts certain bodies to enforce its own values. And those bodies are undermining the values of the Constitution in the name of defending them. It's paradoxical. Paradoxical. We'll dig down on that in in just 30 seconds. I want to give my second shout out of the show to, to the sponsor today and that's of course my Patriot Supply. And you're hearing Aryan talking about of what happens when activists can shut down a whole city. So perfect I think opportunity just to mention of what you might want to do in your own homes to stock up the larder, put something perhaps keep the boxes in the, in the cellar or in the garage just in case your own supply lines are provisionally interrupted for whatever, for whatever time period may be the case. Go to preparewithbannon.com to take advantage of the special $100 off their best selling three month emergency food kit. So originally at $241.99 down with that special offer price down to 141.99. Stock up, put those boxes up in the attic or wherever you, you want to keep them. And then you have to say, then you have peace of mind of knowing that should the supply lines ever be interrupted and it has already happened within living memory, should those things happen, you will, you will have stocks to keep you going. My Patriot supply. Preparewith Bannon.com once again. PreparewithBannon.com go. They've got a special website for you and take a look at that special offer. It's only $141. Can't really go wrong folks. All right, so Aryan last year I think was the Hungarian conservative you wrote about exactly the consequences of the political intimidation pushed by antifa at the previous conference. And you made the argument that these protests had a very structural role in justifying the firewall and applying political pressure to people who thought that the time was right to bring in the AFD from the cold and to work with them. So it had that dual purpose. That's a sort of interesting argument which I hadn't seen before. You also went through with your usual analytic narrative and explained how the state were was using third party activists in order to arrive at blatantly anti constitutional ends from a hands off distance. In fact, you even coined the word for that which I will just bring up now and then I'll ask you to explain again what you think is going to happen this time round. The expression was indirect perpetration. That's the concept here. Indirect perpetration where the state in a hands off way gives the ability the means via taxpayer funded private organizations to pursue a political agenda. Tell me more how that all ties together.
- [45:54]
Erin Agashahi
You know, regularly, even by CDU politicians, the phrase is shared that Germany right now is in the midst of its most difficult financial and economic crisis since the end of the second World War. And how is it possible that under such rough and and difficult circumstances where the biggest German automaker VW just announced that probably more than 100,000 jobs are being laid off. How is it possible that under these circumstances where the cost of living is rising, people can just afford to travel from all over Germany to one town in in their time and just blockade and attack people who exercise a constitutional right? It is possible because, for instance, the trade service union Verdi which is receiving taxpayer money, is financing the bus transfer From More than 30 cities in Germany of activists to the city where the AFD is holding the party assembly. So now just for a moment digest this. The German taxpayer is subsidizing a union which has not only the expectation but actually legally mandate to represent all workers from all political background. However, this, this union is using its taxpayer money to finance buses to the AfD party assembly. And this is an indirect subsidization by the state. The same state which actually has the legal obligation to protect the AfD party assembly is indirectly financing those groups which are causing the need for protection in the first place. And this is, you know, the firewall machine game which is played in Germany and why this game is played. I don't believe that there is just one person which you know, is causing all this effects. I think that over the last 10, 15 years we have established in Germany an NGO industry which is actually living from taxpayer money and its sole purpose is just to fight against the AFD because the AFT is totally artificially, you know, described as being the same threat which the Nazi party was in the 30s in the Weimar Republic. And this is really a shame, not because of those who are actually the activists, which in my opinion are victims of an educational system which didn't educate them. It is in my opinion really a shame for Germany, which more than 75 years after the end of the Second World War, successfully built and established a highly successful economy and is now really losing the basic knowledge about what makes a society free, which is open discourse.
- [49:29]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
Arian, by the way, they're not just busing people in from all over Germany to Airfort, they're busing them in from France and Italy as well. This is the international scale of what's going to take place this weekend is not to be underestimated. They're really going all in. Honored as always, grateful as always that you come onto the war room and break this down for us. I think Americans are going to be concentrating on the 4th of July this weekend, but we'll flag this up next week. In the meantime, social media, where do people go to keep up with your analysis and output on social media?
- [50:14]
Erin Agashahi
As always, you can visit Hungarian Conservative to read articles not only from me, but also from our co authors. And of course on X you can find my commentary under Aryan Underscore Germany,
- [50:31]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
our favorite, the world's favorite Aryan nationalist. Erin, grateful as always. That's all we got time for. Happy birthday America. Lots of love in your direction for tomorrow. My thanks to Spencer and Real America's voice and Victorio Santi Franco for putting this show together. I'll leave you with the shout, the chance of send them back Great Moose out of the European Parliament. Take care folks. God bless.
- [50:58]
Olivier Beau
Steve.
- [50:59]
Host (possibly Steve Bannon or a co-host)
7:00am tomorrow in the chair.