WarRoom Battleground EP 744: Judge Boasberg’s ‘Coincidental’ Contempt Timeline Against Trump Admin

Summary

WarRoom Battleground EP 744: Judge Boasberg’s ‘Coincidental’ Contempt Timeline Against Trump Admin - Detailed Summary

Release Date: April 11, 2025

In this episode of Bannon's War Room, hosted by Stephen K. Bannon of WarRoom.org, the focus centers on the escalating legal confrontation between the Trump administration and U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. The episode delves deep into Judge Boasberg’s actions concerning alleged contempt by the Trump administration for violating court orders related to deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act.

---

1. Introduction to the Legal Standoff [00:17 - 01:05]

Kena opens the discussion by highlighting the tension between the Trump administration and Judge Boasberg. The judge has accused the government of acting in bad faith following a recent hearing aimed at determining violations of his court order to halt deportation flights. These flights involved deporting alleged gang members to a high-security prison in El Salvador under the contentious Alien Enemies Act.

"Now, Judge Boasberg said that the rushed process that the administration engaged in to put those over 200 migrants on those planes and get them to that supermax prison in El Salvador seemed to be deliberately and done in bad faith." [01:05]

---

2. Analysis of the Hearing and Potential Contempt Proceedings [01:05 - 03:28]

Alex Mallon, ABC News justice reporter, provides an in-depth analysis of the recent hearing. He notes that Judge Boasberg appears inclined to initiate contempt proceedings against the administration. Mallon emphasizes the judge's focus on the timeline and the administration’s purportedly deliberate actions to bypass the court order.

"He said that at the conclusion of that hearing that he was going to consider whether the administration there was a probable cause, that they did. They did violate his order deliberately." [01:05]

Devin Dwyer, ABC News senior Washington reporter, discusses the limited options judges have in holding the government accountable. He suggests that Boasberg is leveraging his judicial authority to extract more information rather than imposing severe penalties.

"Boasberg is really limited. And it does appear, Kaina, that he's simply trying to use the power of the bench to extract more information. More than anything else." [02:31]

---

3. Stephen Bannon’s Commentary on the Judicial Pressure [03:28 - 27:03]

Stephen K. Bannon shifts the conversation towards a broader critique of the judicial system, portraying it as an adversarial force against the Trump administration. He labels Judge Boasberg’s actions as part of a “dying regime” resisting change.

"This is the primal scream of a dying regime." [03:28]

Bannon further elaborates on his belief that various contributors and supporters are at the forefront of a revolutionary movement to restore America’s greatness. He critiques the judiciary’s role, suggesting that judges like Boasberg are part of a larger "judicial insurrection" against President Trump and his policies.

"It's the judicial insurrection going on against President Trump and his policies right now, ma'am." [21:29]

---

4. Detailed Breakdown of Judge Boasberg’s Actions [09:00 - 21:29]

Jeb Boasberg provides a counter-narrative to Bannon’s assertions, offering a timeline of Judge Boasberg’s actions on March 15. He argues that the judge intentionally set up a "contempt trap" by scheduling a hearing to coincide with deportation flights, thereby catching the DOJ off guard.

"He set the hearing time specifically to coincide with the departure of these two Deportation planes." [09:00]

Boasberg contends that the verbal order to turn around the planes was not included in the subsequent written order, leading to confusion and potential legal discrepancies. He emphasizes that the Supreme Court had already vacated previous orders, questioning the legitimacy of the contempt proceedings.

"Any contempt investigation inquiry that he wants to proceed with will have to be based on this verbal ruling. So that's been an ongoing dispute." [16:22]

Stephen Bannon responds by criticizing the DOJ’s legal strategy, questioning why more experienced lawyers were not countering the judge’s tactics effectively. He suggests that the administration might be struggling to manage internal opposition and legal challenges.

"Why wouldn't a skilled lawyer have seen this and start combating that in the courtroom and try to shut down or at least expose and say, hey, Judge, I know what you're trying to do here and we're not going to play games." [12:17]

Boasberg continues to defend his position, highlighting the Supreme Court’s influence and the ongoing legal battles. He insists that Judge Boasberg is persisting with his actions despite potential pushback from higher courts.

"He is not done pushing the envelope on this. He took this on as a crusade." [17:22]

---

5. Broader Political Implications and Future Actions [21:29 - 27:03]

Bannon ties the legal showdown to wider political strategies, including impeachment efforts against Boasberg. He underscores the significance of legal battles in undermining the administration’s agenda and distracting the DOJ from other investigative activities.

"Mike Davis’s impeachment thing is absolutely justified. Because of what's happening here." [21:29]

Jeb Boasberg rebuts by outlining the ongoing legal maneuvers and hints at further challenges ahead. He points out that even after Supreme Court rulings, Judge Boasberg remains determined to continue his actions, characterizing his efforts as a crusade against the Trump administration.

"This is a formidable challenge. And in some ways, they're flying blind because you have to rely on career lawyers who have been there that you trust will do their job." [21:29]

---

6. Concluding Discussions and Speculations

As the episode progresses, Bannon and Boasberg engage in a back-and-forth dialogue about the motivations and future implications of the legal confrontations. Bannon speculates on potential outcomes, such as additional contempt charges or further judicial actions against the Trump administration, while Boasberg maintains his stance on the necessity of upholding judicial orders.

"He's still challenging now, not just the Trump administration, but now the Supreme Court." [27:03]

---

Notable Quotes

• Alex Mallon: "Judge Boasberg really laid it on the government, and it really seemed like he is leaning towards initiating contempt proceedings." [01:05]

• Devin Dwyer: "Judges typically don't to do that when it involves an agency that those sorts of things can also be challenged in court." [02:31]

• Stephen K. Bannon: "This is the primal scream of a dying regime." [03:28]

• Jeb Boasberg: "He set the hearing time specifically to coincide with the departure of these two Deportation planes." [09:00]

---

Conclusion

This episode of WarRoom Battleground provides a comprehensive examination of the tense legal battle between the Trump administration and Judge Boasberg. Through expert analyses and heated discussions, the episode unpacks the complexities of judicial authority, government compliance, and the broader political maneuvers at play. Listeners gain insight into the strategic interactions between the judiciary and the executive branch, set against the backdrop of ongoing debates over immigration policy and executive power.

---

For further updates and in-depth reporting, listeners are encouraged to follow Julie Kelly’s Substack and other contributors who provide ongoing coverage of these pivotal legal and political developments.

Transcript

[Kena]

All right, we turn now to the Trump administration standoff with a federal judge, U.S. district Judge James Boasberg, now saying that the government appears to have acted in bad faith. This comes after the hearing wrapped just moments ago to determine whether or not the government violated his court order to stop the deportation flights, two of them with alleged members of a gang, to a mega prison in El Salvador. President Trump invoked the Alien Enemies act last month. It's a wartime authority used to deport noncitizens with little to no due process by arguing that the Venezuelan gang is a, quote, hybrid criminal state that he says is invading the country. Joining me for more is ABC News justice reporter Alex Mallon and ABC News senior Washington reporter Devin Dwyer. Gentlemen, thank you for being with us. And, Alex, the hearing just wrapped here. What are your main takeaways?

[Alex Mallon]

I mean, it was really a fascinating hearing, Kena. I mean, Judge Boasberg really laid it on the government, and it really seemed like he is leaning towards initiating contempt proceedings. Now, what that's going to look like, we don't know. But he basically tried to drill down the timeline of the government and that March 15, that Saturday hearing where he initiated this verbal order to the government to say if there are currently any planes in the air with migrants that are being deported under the Alien Enemies act, you need to turn those around. The government has maintained both that they comply with a written order order that was later issued by Judge Boasberg. And also they said that his jurisdiction was largely moot once the planes were out of international waters. This hearing, though, Judge Boasberg said that the rushed process that the administration engaged in to put those, you know, over 200 migrants on those planes and get them to that supermax prison in El Salvador seemed to be deliberately and done in bad faith. He said it seemed to be designed to basically dodge any court order that he issued that day. And so he said that at the conclusion of that hearing that he was going to consider whether the administrationthere was a probable cause, that they did. They did violate his order deliberately. He said he will be issuing some kind of written order on that sometime likely next week.

[Kena]

Okay. So, Devin, depending on what that written order says here, if they do decide that they, you know, violated his orders, what's the consequence?

[Devin Dwyer]

Well, the judge in this case, Kana, has limited options, and judges in general don't like big, divisive showdowns with the federal government, as we see here. And that was every indication we received from Judge Boasberg today. He was really using the levers of his ability to question the government name, have them name names, get down to the facts, scrutinize the truth. But at the end of the day, judges have pretty limited tools at their disposal when it comes to holding the government to account for an alleged violation of their order. Sure, he could issue jail time, he could issue fines for any officials involved in this who disobeyed him. But judges typically don't to do that when it involves an agency that those sorts of things can also be challenged in court. So Boasberg is really limited. And it does appear, Kaina, that he's simply trying to use the power of the bench to extract more information. More than anything else.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

This is the primal scream of a dying regime.

[Julie Kelly]

Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Trinity's not got a free shot.

[Julie Kelly]

All these networks lying about the people.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

People have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that.

[Julie Kelly]

I know you try to do everything.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

In the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen. And where do people like that go to share the big lie?

[Mike Lindell]

MAGA MEDIA I wish in my soul.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

I wish that any of these people had a conscience.

[Julie Kelly]

Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.

[Forrest]

WAR ROOM here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Foreign It's Thursday, the 10th of April in the year of our Lord 2025. Thanks for being here for the fourth hour of the show, the second hour of the late afternoon, early evening. I want to say something. I'm going to bring Julie Kelly in a second. This audience and the changes that you've brought about in history, in world history. President Trump would not be back here and is empowered if you had not put your shoulder to the wheel years and years ago, to the precinct strategy and getting involved in supporting President Trump and going to rallies and all that, and also supporting the institutions that came up at the same time, basically, you know, center for Renewing America and the Heritage Project 2025. And Brooks Rollins over there, America First Policy Institute, Stephen Miller at America First Law Institute and Senator Dement and Mark Meadows at cpi, the Conservative Partnership Institute. All these coming together and the work.

[Julie Kelly]

That was done over the years.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

You are a, you know, a cadre at the tip of the tip of the spear of, quite frankly, a revolutionary movement. That movement is to bring America, return America to her greatness. And if you see this whole thing we're getting into with judges, this the five victories we've had and the attention we're getting now in the legal community. You see this on Ms. In the New York Times every day. The furor, the anger that they're coming up with every night, that we're actually questioning the judicial system about a judicial insurrection. And you look around the world at how that's happening all the way from Israel to Brazil to France to South Korea and here in the United States. It's kind of this. It's all moving as a piece. Also, the people, you know, this audience, this show attracts, a certain type of contributor that goes out there, certain type of information. Julie Kelly's perfect example. Julie Kelly is not a lawyer. Julie Kelly. Kelly was a concerned citizen and an activist that got involved in starting going to courts on the J6, on everything related to J6. And now she is kind of the ax in the space for all this. The Mike Davises of the world, right? The Todd Benson of the world. The Ben Berkwams, Oscar Blue Ramirez, wherever there's a tough issue, you have these people that are contributors that really get in and show the receipts and are not just sitting there to give you commentary. They're there to give you actually the facts of what's going on, and you make up your own mind, and then people can get activated around that and actually make a change. That's in the last hour, so frustrated about this thing about the southern border and the invasion. It is so outrageous and at such a scale. We got to have responsibility, got to have accountability. This is what Julie Kelly sees every day. If you go to her substack or support her reporting. Now she's onto a whole different thing. President Trump and how the federal judiciary is actually in an insurrection right now. Now because of you guys getting up and getting on Article 3 and going. And now Mike Davis has got you tasked for two things. Number one, take the $2 billion that they're forcing the president to pay the consultants for this, you know, for the work in foreign policy for usaid. Get your congressman to say, hey, we're taking in the appropriations. We're taking it right out of the federal. $10 billion goes of federal judges. The other is impeach Boasberg, right? This is all of a piece, and Julie Kelly's here, and there's still so much stuff she can't even cover right now, how they're coming after President Trump that she's focused on a couple. One of the most important is this contempt trap that she's very focused on to try to get it remember Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon went to prison on contempt. This is one of the ways they try to go about and get it. They try to sit there and they try to lay out the fact that if you're, if you're going to support a certain thing, they're going to lay it out to make it impossible for you to do unless you go tounless they try to get you in a criminal charge and go to prison. I happen to believe that you're seeing Boasberg, who I think is totally evil and obviously a Trump hater and a MAGA hater try to do on this. Julie, I realize you've got a lot to go through tonight. I do want to start with the Boasberg stuff. I mean, in fact, we pulled different clips to kind of kick it off. I thought that was great because there are actually people out there that kind of agree with you that are not on our side of the football. Can you give us the latest? I know you're going through a very detailed timeline for your substack. What's up with Boasberg? Because Boasberg is the guy as the head judge of the, of the first level of courts there, the district courts, he's got a target on Trump. He is coming for President Trump. Of that there's no doubt he's coming for Trump and you've actually exposed how he's trying to do it. So take it away, ma'am.

[Jeb Boasberg]

So what I just posted, and this is a very detailed timeline of what went down on March 15 and how Jeb Bosberg not only just decided to pursue a contempt case against the Trump administration, but he actually set it up starting in the early morning hours of March 15th when that ACL ACLU lawsuit was filed representing the illegal Venezuelans who are going to be covered by the Alien Enemies Act. And I go through all of Bosberg's movements and decisions that day, comments that he made during that hearing, comments he made afterwards to tip his hand that this was specifically, it appears, taken by him as the chief judge not assigned to him, that he took this case early that morning, continued to make these decisions and lure Trump officials into a contempt trap. Now, what does that address? What you just played in the cold open, this so called oral ruling, he calls it, to turn planes around, knowing that when he set this hearing at 5:00 on March 15, he already knew that two planes carrying these illegal Venezuelans would be taking off during the hearing. So he set the hearing time specifically to coincide with the departure of these two Deportation planes. He then called a brief recess in the hearing directing the DOJ attorney to go try to find out details about these flights, which, of course, the DOJ attorney couldn't do because it was a Saturday night. Bossberg knew that when the poor DOJ attorney comes back at about 6:00, says, I have no details, Bossberg and the ACLU knew these flights had taken off. He then enters what he called this oral ruling. At about 6:45, the planes had already been long gone, over an hour out of U.S. airspace. They took off from Southern Texas to Central America, ordered those flights back. Now, what's interesting, Steve, is what he said verbally. He did not include in a written temporary restraining order that he filed about 40 minutes later. But now this verbal ruling is the basis of this contempt investigation. We're expecting this opinion to be issued tomorrow. In what he has called probable cause for contempt, accused the Trump administration last week of acting in bad faith and disobeying at least this order. Now, his other two written orders, of course, have been vacated by the Supreme Court, so they're not even active anymore. So any contempt investigation inquiry that he wants to proceed with will have to be based on this verbal ruling. So, so sketchy. And so my new piece really articulates almost hour by hour, what happened that day as he created that contempt trap for the Trump administration.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Okay, help me out here. And this in the previous hour, folks, I'm not, I'm not saying things against the Trump administration. You got to remember, every department of there's like Fort Apache, you have the administrative state that still has 90% of the bodies. You're like in Saigon in 1967, you're trying to manage something that the enemy's inside the wire constantly. People, they're understaffed, right? There are not enough people gotten through there and confirmations and all of it. They're overwhelmed in everything they're trying to do. If you talk these people after hours and some of the relationships. And that's back to the thing I was saying at the beginning of this. Think how many people we've had on this show, either as contributors or guests all the time, or co hosts that are now in the administration and more of the contributors. I think you will see the Julie Kelly's and the Mike Davises and the E.J. antonis and the Todd Benson's. There'll be a whole nother second wave. I'm not saying those specific people. It's going to be a whole nother second wave that go in there because these People are fighters and subject matter experts, and they won't back down. They have courage. But here's what concerns me when I read your thing and I see it. Shouldn't the Justice Department lawyer that's actually representing the government and President Trump and DOJ and the people that were involved in dhs, shouldn't they have known? It's when you lay it out, it's pretty obvious what was going on. Why wouldn't a skilled lawyer have seen this and start combating that in the courtroom and try to shut down or at least expose and say, hey, Judge, I know what you're trying to do here and we're not going to play games. We're not playing this game. We're not going to be party to this, Ma'am.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Well, I think this was part of how everything and Judge Jeb Bossberg, as I say in my piece, he admitted everyone's working on the fly here. He said, I haven't had any time to research this. He verbalized many times how quickly he was rushing. He said at one point in a later hearing, this was out of the norm. This was not the common way that lawsuits like this were handled. So they rushed this do on purpose to put this DOJ attorney dragged into this on a Saturday, had no idea that this was coming. So that's how they really caught this guy off guard. And then knowing it was a Saturday evening on March 15 and that he wouldn't be able to get in contact with the right people and give Judge Bossberg more details. Now, I will say Drew Ensign, who is the attorney, DOJ attorney, I think he did what he could in this particular hearing on March 15. I was not impressed with his subsequent performances, especially on April 3, when he started voluntarily giving up names of Trump officials he talked to after that hearing who might have been listening in to the March 15 hearing. So that's just sort of.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

But in his, in his defense. But in his defense, when you used to cover J6, and I know this from my own trial, you would have the most senior guy show up in the department. I mean, they had, they were, people were like in shock for a misdemeanor. They were bringing the heavy artillery out when they had me and I understood it, hey, if we can get Bannon, we're send a message to all these people, right. On a misdemeanor and send into a federal prison, we'll do it. Same with Peter.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Right.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

The second or third time the guy goes in court, he's one guy. I mean, and I understand they are strapped over there. But wouldn't this rise to say, hey, look, this is, they're trying to get us on a criminal contempt charge and they're going to try throw some DHS people, maybe some military people, and they're.

[Julie Kelly]

Going to go all the way up.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

And try to do something with Trump. Wouldn't that, wouldn't you have like this three or four scenes? Shouldn't Pam have like, maybe showed up that day symbolically like, like, like, like the old, like the Biden Justice Department used to do all the time to send Lisa Monaco and those people to send, to send their highest in their most seasoned prosecutors in for misdemeanor hearings? Ma'am.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Well, I think what happened that evening and when Bosberg made that ludicrous statement about turning planes around, first of all, I don't think the DOJ attorney thought that that was really serious. But Judge Bosberg also said, I'm going to put this in a written order. And he actually said, no one has to write anything down. I'm going to put this in a written order. So then when he filed his written minute order at about 7:26 that evening, he did not include his comments about returning the planes. So at that point, I'm sure the DOJ thought that that verbal command was not in play because it wasn't reflected in the written one. And then that became an argument later. And there's case law in common practice that says verbal. It has to be a written order, has to be on the docket like the other two temporary restraining orders issued that day on the docket written, and the verbal one was not. So that's been an ongoing dispute.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

But what I didn't like was coughing up names when the judge goes, who? Well, I can't really know. I don't remember it. No, tell me who. And you're coughing up names. That to me should just tell the judge, hey, we'll get back to you. And then you, then you stonewall it or you drag it out, you play hardball. That's when you know the judge has got the fix in for you. This thing stinks to high heaven. And my concern is this going to metastasize because MSNBC is driving this every night. This is like the one they fantasize about because they see Trump going to Danbury on a contempt charge. Trust me, these people are so deranged on Trump hatred, they're twisted and Bosberg's one of them. And this also makes, which I think is Mike Davis's impeachment thing is absolutely justified. Because of what's happening here. Where do we stand? I thought paper's supposed to be filed. Is this thing actually going to move forward, or since he was kind of overruled about the main event, shouldn't it just go away?

[Jeb Boasberg]

No. What he did, Bossberg did very brazenly. After the Supreme Court ruling came down Monday night, Tuesday morning, he canceled a hearing that was set for that day. So this is April 8th on a preliminary injunction. So this is the natural next step after a temporary restraining order. So he was going to hold a hearing. He canceled it. But what he told the ACLU representing these illegal Venezuelans is, hey, by April 16, I want you to file another memo or notice as to why you think that this courtroom is still the proper venue to seek a preliminary injunction. Well, how ballsy is that? I mean, the Supreme Court had already said in its opinion that the Washington jurisdiction was improper, that you should seek habeas, and it should be in the jurisdiction where the defendant is in custody. And in this case would have been Southern Texas, at least at that point. So he's still challenging now, not just the Trump administration, but now the Supreme Court. So we'll see next week what the ACLU comes back with. Now, he could. Can he proceed with preliminary injunction hearings? I mean, I suppose so. He'll probably be smacked down by the Supreme Court again. But he is not done pushing the envelope on this. He took this on as a crusade. Look, this is the guy who has called January 6th an insurrection. He said this over and over in J6 cases, that that was an insurrection incited by President Trump. So this is a longtime grudge that Jeb Bossberg has had. And so this is why he's going to keep pushing this as long as he possibly can.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

If. Just make sure. I understand. If acu, ACLU decides, they're not going to file. I know they are because they're going to try to get this figure out. This Texas thing. Is the contempt thing still a thing? Is he still going to push that separate and above everything else, or because the Supreme Court ruled it, that just dies and President Trump and his team are off the hook?

[Jeb Boasberg]

No, I think he will definitely pursue the contempt case. Now, the aclu, I believe in the five original plaintiffs, they've already sought habeas in, I believe, New York and Texas. So I'm not really sure what the ACLU will do with a preliminary injunction, except for the fact that Judge Bosberg turned those five unnamed illegals into a class action. Into a class. So he did that in one of the temporary restraining orders that has been overturned. But this demonstrates how messy all of this is. He still believes, or wants to believe that there's a thread he can hang onto to keep this matter in his courtroom. But that's separate from what would be a contempt inquiry or contempt allegations related to the verbal order that was not on the docket and not reversed by the Supreme Court because it wasn't even an issue or a question in that litigation. But we will know tomorrow because he said last week that he would issue his opinion on contempt this week. So I'm sure we will have it at some point tomorrow.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Okay, we've got five wins at the Supreme Court. The court never wanted to get involved in the steal of 2020. They only got involved years later, I think, on. On Fisher and J6. Why is it pressure that's been put on them? Why are they. Why are they now responding? Looks like they're in some of this to tamp down. At least it tamped down somewhat. The judicial insurrection is going on against President Trump and his policies right now, ma'am.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Well, to your point, they have, they've made a few decisions, put a hold on some lower court decisions, obviously here, vacated the temporary restraining order. So I think they're just slowly, bit by bit, kind of, you know, take disassembling little parts of this lawfare. Is it late in the game? Yes, because so much damage has already been done. And to your point, distracting the Department of Justice and the president and the entire Trump administration, sabotaging the agenda of the president and his White House team, because this is all anyone has really been talking about is what's happening in these various lawsuits and taking away resources and time that I know the DOJ wants to use in other areas, including investigations and prosecutions of what we would like to see. They have been completely stretched. Then they've had to depend on career prosecutors like they had in this case a career immigration lawyer. And keep it. Also of interest, two of the immigration lawyers who were involved in the Bosberg case were also in the Maryland father Rego Garcia, I think is his last name. The El Salvadoran who was removed, suspected MS.13 member, and then deported to El Salvador. Two of the lawyers in that case were removed by the Department of Justice for saying that they were not arguing on behalf of the government and the administration. Two of those lawyers also involved in the Spassberg case. So this is what Pam Bondi and her team are up against. This is a formidable challenge. And in some ways, they're flying blind because you have to rely on career lawyers who have been there that you trust will do their job. And you have them in some cases, openly sabotaging them. Like we saw in Eric Adams prosecution, prosecutors coming out denouncing their bosses at the DOJ for trying to drop that indictment. And then you've got just either they're really bad at their jobs, or they are also working to undermine the will of Trump's Department of Justice and the president in the process.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Now, what is the situation regarding Jensen?

[Jeb Boasberg]

Right, so this is a controversy this week. News that Cash Patel and Dan Bongino have moved Steve Jensen, who was head of, I think the Columbia, South Carolina, or a few field offices in that area, moved him to the Washington field office. So you had Tom Fitton on the other day discussing this. This has led to, I think, understandable.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Yeah, Tom. Tom Finn and the guys were all worked up about this. What's your take on it?

[Jeb Boasberg]

So Jensen, there's no question his hands are dirty when it comes to January 6th. He was head of FBI domestic terrorism unit and held calls and apparently was promoting the prosecution of J6ers because the FBI, Chris Wray, had designated January 6th an act of domestic terror. So certainly understandable that people would be outraged and questioning this move. However, you have to have people with their hands dirty to show you where the dirt is. And it's not, certainly not questionable or out of the ordinary when you're trying to get information, to have people who might have that information show you access to it. It's not like Chris Wray put all of the evidence to all of the unanswered questions that we need in neat little piles on Kash Patel's desk. Right. That did. That didn't happen. You saw what Tulsi Gabbard said last night on Fox News. As far as the intelligence community, they buried stuff everywhere. And she said, the more we dig, the more we find. But they've set up and we know this barriers to access that. So do you have someone like a Steve Jensen? And I could be totally wrong, and I gladly take a back seat to Tom Fitton, my friend Miranda Devine, who we were with last week, who also has a column up criticizing the Jensen move. I take a back seat, respectfully and gladly to both of them. I'm just saying that I trust Cash and Dan. I believe that there's a reason why they kept Jensen, who was in daily communication with Chris Wray, with Steven Dantuano, who was the former head of the Washington field office. That's where everything is buried at that field office. Also Tim Tebolt, the dirty, former, corrupt, disgraced FBI agent. So he was in communication with all of them. So could he have valuable information that they need to lead them where they need to go? Probably. I don't think this is a reward for what he did for January 6th, but I think this is how sometimes.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Just, just hang, hang on one second. I'm gonna hold you through the break. I want to get to the bottom of this very, very controversial short break. Julie Kelly.

[Julie Kelly]

You don't go out and buy a life jacket when the boat is already sinking. And you don't buy gold when the economy has already collapsed. Clearly others are heeding this advice as gold hit an all time high the first part of 2025 multiple times. It's not too late for you. The company I trust to help you diversify into physical gold is Birch Gold, the company I buy my gold from. Birch Gold specializes in helping you convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax sheltered IRA and physical gold for no money out of pocket. Just listen to this five star review quote, knowledgeable, helpful, non pressure, end quote. That's what you get with Burch Gold.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

And that's why I've endorsed them for so long.

[Julie Kelly]

Get your free info kit on Gold by texting the word Bannon B N N O N to 989-898. There's no obligation, just useful information with an A plus rating from the Better Business Bureau and countless five star reviews. Text Bannon B A N N o N to 989-898 and let the experts at Birchgold help you secure your financial future today with gold. Are you a yo yo dieter? You diet, lose weight but gain it all back plus a few extra pounds for the effort. Then later you lose it again and regain it again. And on and on and on.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

I think I resemble this.

[Julie Kelly]

It's dangerous. Studies show that you can increase your risk of heart attack, stroke, type 2 diabetes and other health problems. Breaking free of your yo yo diet pattern is a main reason doctors created Lean. Lean is a supplement, not an injection. And you don't need a prescription. The science behind Lean is impressive. It studied natural ingredients target weight loss in three powerful ways. Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar. It helps control appetite and cravings. And it helps burn fat by converting fat into energy. Listen, if you're tired of losing weight and gaining it back, if you want to lose meaningful weight at a healthy pace, Lean was created for you. Let me get you started with 20% off when you enter Bannon 20 that's B A N N O N [e-mail] that's code Bannon [e-mail] Bannon 20 that's20akelen.com lose it and keep it off. I've been telling you about a very.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Serious threat to your home equity home title fraud.

[Julie Kelly]

One document, a fake notary stamp and about 40 bucks and your title is out of your name and into someone else's. And the scammer who took it will take out loans or even worse, sell your home behind your back. You have to protect yourself. The best way is home title lock's million dollar triple lock protection. Now this service gives you 24. 7 Monitoring urgent alerts of any changes. And if fraud happens, their US based restoration team will spend up to $1 million to fix the fraud and restore your title. Go to hometitlelock.com use my promo code Steve25 to save 25% and get a free title history report to make sure you're not already a victim. And make sure you check out the million dollar triple lock protection details when you get there. That's hometitlelock.com promo code steve25 hometitlelock.com, promo code steve25 do it today. And let me remind you, this service is 24.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

7 monitoring urgent alerts of any changes.

[Julie Kelly]

And if fraud does happen, their U. S based restoration team will spend up to $1 million to fix the fraud and restore your title. Do it.

[Forrest]

War room.

[Julie Kelly]

Here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Julie, this. Julie Kelly's with me. Julie, this gets back to this issue we were talking about. In an understaffed administration that's under siege because they're coming at him from every different way, folks. It's actually more intense, I think, than the first time because President Trump's actually getting more done. He's coming with a plan. Bang, bang, bang. And they're trying to chop block him every step. Is the controversy about Jensen, the fact of why don't you just get rid of these guys? I guess cash, the people FBI and Jeff Smart want to get rid of them because they had past bad actors. But you, Finn and Miranda are arguing, you're arguing, hey, he may have relevant information, that information may make things quicker. They're arguing he's a bad guy because he worked for, he worked for these guys. And where do we come out on this? Is it more that we got to get investigations done and people like this help us or that they had anything to do with January 6th and other things like that, they should just be gotten rid of and maybe charged themselves.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Well, and I want to just reiterate, Steve Jensen's hands are dirty January 6th there, in some cases, in some ways dirtier than others, because he did take a lead role. So I'm not diminishing that, not excusing it. I'm not justifying it. But when you're looking for people who know where the dead bodies are buried, who know where this information could be housed, who can explain how everything went down and who was really responsible for it, you have to have those inside sources to do that. And so, look, I was defund. The FBI, you know, burned down the building. I mean, I don't think I said that, so I don't want to be in trouble for that. But that was when the Democrats were running it. So, okay, now we can shut down the FBI. Sounds like a swell idea. Okay. I'm sure we can survive without it. But with it goes all the answers to the questions that we have. How many FBI informants and undercover employees and other assets were involved in January 6th? Stoking the events of that day. You saw Joe Kent so admirably talk to Senator Mark Kelly about that yesterday and saying that the intelligence community is looking into that. Where is the pipe bomber? What happened to that? How, after more than four years, did that remain unsolved? So many questions that we still don't have answers to. Were there members of Congress who were involved in the plotting and planning of January 6? There certainly is evidence to point to that. So, again, Chris Wray didn't leave all of this information and evidence and material and records on Kash Patel's desk. To the contrary, it is hidden. Who knows behind how many locks? And this is what Tulsi Gabbard again was referring to in her interview last night. So with great respect to Tom Benton.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Yeah, no, Tom and Tom and Miranda are fantastic. And Miranda was with us at the Justice Department last week.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Yeah.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Let me ask. Does. Does the president signing the on Krebs last night to essentially put forward an investigation of the machines in the 2020 election? Is that the first one that we've seen? Let's get down to it, because I've always said the railhead of all this gets back to 20. You know, the election, 2020. We can go back to Pandemic, and there's plenty to do there. But if we started the election in 2020, that'd be a good place to start and then go right through January 6th. Do you think his sign the Executive order in Krebs is at least the first thing of movement we've seen with the president saying and let's get on with this and I need to see some movement here, some action.

[Jeb Boasberg]

I believe so. And I think that was such a bold move and you saw the reaction even from Chris Krebs. And Steve, I pulled up Chris Krebs 1.6.Select Committee and I'm sorry to laugh. He is a clown. And I'm going to be posting some of the things that he said in this interview including that the Iranians were working with the proud boys in October of 2020 to send out emails to people who are registered Democrats and threatening them if they voted Democrat. This is the most far fetched thing I've seen and I have to laugh because of course I know who the proud boys are. I covered parts of their trial. It's preposterous to think that what Enrique Tarrio was working with the Iranian regime to send out emails to Democrats in Florida. This guy is a total joke. And so I'm going to be posting posting parts of that transcript later tonight. But I do think that this is another signal from the president and his team that they are going to and of course he said this. Look at the 2020 election, what happened there. But more importantly who covered up all of the fraud that we know happened and whitewashed it away and would not take responsibility for looking into what we know was was decisive voting fraud in that election. So I think Chris Krebs is very is an ideal person to launch this investigation about around.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Yeah, I think it was smart. Julie Kelly, where do people get to your substack where to get all of your reporting everything that you're you're doing right now now more than ever.

[Jeb Boasberg]

So substack is declassified with Julie Kelly and then my X account julie_kelly2 and I will be watching the docket all day tomorrow to see what Jeb Bossberg posts related to his contempt opinion And I will be posting that as soon as it hits the docket.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

And we will, we will be with Julie Kelly and giving her a platform so she can talk to the nation and the world. Thank you man. Appreciate you.

[Jeb Boasberg]

Thanks Steve.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Want to have Faris Cho here because I not quite sure that people still maybe get to the depth of where we are right now with the Chinese Communist Party. Forrest, thank you for joining us and you and I swapped some text messages earlier because I kind of know and I really like your perspective and what you're doing over for the new federal State. The daily news briefings you put up I think are just spectacular. Just walk the American people through. This is not about tariffs and it's not about trade. Do you agree with this? This is a much, much deeper, deeper and I think a chasm that's unbridgeable between the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America and the Chinese Communist Party.

[Mike Lindell]

Forrest sir, absolutely. This is definitely a war between the good and evil. And first of all I would like to see this probably is the greatest movement that led by President Trump to anti Chinese Communist Party. I really applaud the move that President Trump just made. I think the key here is to counter Chinese Communist Party is we need to find out who is our real enemy. Of course that's Chinese Communist Party. The other countries might be, it's our competitors. We need to talk with them, we need to negotiate with them and to ally with them to counter and isolated Chinese Communist Party. And the Chinese Communist Party is the real enemy. And this war, this unrestricted war or this war between the American and the Chinese Communist Party is not about the tariff, it's not about fairness. It's about life and death. So that's how important it is. I would like our audience to understand this. So I think what I just said, the President Trump tried to ally with European country and also probably market driven countries in Asia like Japan, like Taiwan, like Vietnam to work with American to counter Chinese Communist Party. Of course the Chinese Communist Party has their weakness which we can talk about here. Their biggest weakness is their state owned enterprises. The state owned enterprises contribute significant part of the Chinese Communist Party's gdp. They are the weakness point. I can give you some numbers. Back in 2019, almost 30% of the GDP is contributed by those SOEs. After pandemic this number rose to more than 40, even 50%. That tells you how much economy is relying on those state owned enterprises. But those state owned enterprises, they are heavily relying on the monetary policy. Meaning if there is any fluctuation in the currency, they will have trouble because all their employees is relying on their wages. If there is any fluctuation in the currency or if the RMB devalues, then it will impact their purchasing power, it will impact their operation. So we all know CCP manipulate their currency. They have a dual system which has an onshore and offshore currency. That's where they manipulate the currency. With us they have done internal studies. If that value gap more than 35% then CCP is over. With the current tariff, basically we reduce their dollar income rapidly. So I don't think the Chinese Communist Party will survive. This is the key. So if SOE has trouble then it will start the social unrest and also the people. And also one more thing is they have done studies. More than 80% of the Chinese people, even high percentage of the officials, CCP officials actually they believe in the us. They admire the US system. They basically have American dream. If this decoupling happens, if there is devaluation of the Chinese yen, then they will have internal change which so which will undermine or dismantling the Chinese Communist Party.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

There are a group of gangsters the SOEs people should understand. The state owned industries was one of the major points of contention in the Lighthizer 2019 deal. The reason Wan Qishi Shan told Xi, I don't know what Lee Hood did, but we basically put massive restrictions on state owned industries. They couldn't be used as money laundering operations because this is where a major way the Chinese Communist Party leadership cadre is skimming money from the Chinese people from la Beijing and investing it in American real estate. Here's the system. All of their children, the princelings, virtually anyone's, is just not too lazy and wants to party all the time in Beijing.

[Julie Kelly]

But the ones that have any get.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Up and go all go to American universities. They're all at Harvard. Their goal is to get their kids Western educated and to get the money.

[Julie Kelly]

They steal from Lao Beijing and not.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Put it in real estate in Shanghai. They're buying midtown Manhattan. That's part of the scam is that it's not just the farmland that the CCP is buying formally. Hey, the five factions that run the country aren't buying farmland around military bases. They're buying premier real estate in midtown Manhattan and sending their kids to Harvard. Okay? They understand how corrupt their system is. They're just like a group of gangsters that are running a con and are not going to come down. This is my point that we're not dealing with, with politicians as bad as politicians are and is incompetent and as vain and as you know, the swamp. This is different. This is a set of heart. This is like the Bolsheviks and this is like the group around Hitler and the Nazis. These are basically criminal organizations that come to power and they come to power basically by a barrel of a gun or violence, okay? And they're not just going to give it up. Number one, they understand what the Chinese people do to them home. If they just give all the stealing and the murder and the forced abortions everything that they visited on these people, the paybacks are going to be unbelievable. So they're just not going to sit there and go that's why this is so much deeper than just a trade deal. It's so much deeper than tariffs. This cuts to the heart of two different systems and a system that has been propped up and basically financed off of the money of the American working people and middle class that now we're at a time of testing. We've got to go. But your daily news site is fantastic. I try to re put these things up on getter right now. What is the one thing as this thing evolves every day that you would tell our audience to be looking out for?

[Mike Lindell]

FORREST Looking out for the I think decoupling and also the action that this administration needs to do because I believe this administration needed to start investigation, as your previous a guest just mentioned, we need to launch the investigation about COVID 19 virus origin. We have to hold Chinese Communist Party accountable and also the media who helped them to cover up the origin of the COVID 19. Right now they are helping the Chinese Communist Party to spread all this terror things with hurting Americans. But we have to hold them accountable for covering up the COVID 19 virus thing. There are of course there is more things we have onto the investigation regarding the legal warfare.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

I'd love the COVID 19. Forrest what's your social media? Where do people get you and get new federal state of China?

[Mike Lindell]

Yeah, they can find us on gather. We have NFSC Speaks and we have NFSC tv. You can also find us on X NFS Speaks. Thank you Steve.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Thank you brother. Appreciate you.

[Mike Lindell]

Thank.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Talk about investigations. Michael and Mike Lindell's with us. Lindell, this has got to be a red letter day. Krebs is being investigated and Tulsi Gabbard, didn't she come out and say that hey, DNI is finding out where machines were tampered with. Is this am I hearing this is true? Remember, I'm not a machine, I'm not a machine guy. But I think I'm going to be proven wrong, sir.

[Forrest]

You're gonna be proven wrong, Steve. You know everybody. If you look at the deviations in behavior by uniparty Republicans and people like Chris Krebs, when you look back when Chris Krebs said this is the most secure election ever, you knew that was a lie. And all this is gonna unfold and be uncovered and it's a day of vindication. You have Gabbard's coming out saying all that, that the machines that the they're vulnerable and that they Know, they haven't completely out and said, hey, this was hacked. But the investigations that we have going forward and that this administration is going to be doing, it's going to be awesome. Steve, you will be. We will be melting down these machines and turning them into prison bars, hopefully this year.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

So what is the investigation of Krebs is. That's what's kicking this off is Tulsi's coming from a different internal investigation. She's doing over DNI with the different intelligence services. And really the guys that look at.

[Forrest]

Platforms, I think they're both coming from different directions. I think the executive order with Krebs, you know, one coming in from, I think the president and that team, and then you have. I think they're definitely from both two different directions. And you're gonna see more of that, too. You're gonna see all different directions. There's only one truth here, Steve, and the truth is the 2020 election was. And there were computers used in it. And There's a reason 132 countries. There's a reason 132 countries have banned electronic voting machines. The United States has to secure our elections. That should be number one on our list. Whether, Whether. No matter what it is, we want the most secure elections in the, in the world. And we have. Right now, we have the worst.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Mike, I just lost you right there. I tell you what, why don't you take his time and sell us a. And sell us a pillow, sir.

[Forrest]

Okay. All right, you guys, we have. I'm coming back here. I just got. I just had vocals, by the way.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Mike, Mike, just, just one, one, one sec. Mike, one second. Is your voice okay? Because I know you went out for surgery. We've been doing a tape of you. Is it. Are you doing okay? Because it doesn't sound great. You're doing okay.

[Forrest]

Yeah, no, it's good. Today's the first day. The doctor said I can use it, but. But you guys just kind of come back stronger than ever. This is about the eight surgeries had over the year over the past five, six years. But this is the last one, and my voice is going to be. They say it could be the next Johnny Cast Steve. No, they didn't say that, but they. But no, you guys.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Thanks, Pavarotti.

[Forrest]

Yeah, yeah, but they, but no, the voice is coming back and I got it back just in time. I want to tell you guys, with all these tariffs, remember Canada tariffed all the bedding product we had at MyPillow. So what we're gonna do we're gonna do a special we've never done before. This is the MyPillow mattress topper. 100% made in the USA no matter what size. These are the ones that we developed. 99.99 King Size, Queen size, no matter what size. California Kings, they're all 99.99 with the MyPillow technology. Over 14,000 comfort supports on there. 99.99, the lowest price in history. 10 year warranty, your bed will turn into the best bed in history. Go to the website there. Go down to see Steve. We have some of the percale closeout sheets that are left. $20 a set. We're doing that for the war room policy. You guys, I came back strong here. And don't forget my store. 100% made in the USA. This is made in the USA war room day. And use that promo code.

[Jeb Boasberg]

War room.

[Forrest]

And call 800-873-1062. All my home reps, all in the USA. What a concept, Steve. All these jobs in the USA promo code. War room. What?

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Brother, thank you so much. I want that voice to get better, but I may have to talk to you beforehand that I want to make sure that voice is getting better. Mike Lindell, man, what he sacrificed. After him hard. Okay, 10:00am Eastern Time. 10:00am Eastern Daylight Time tomorrow we're going to return. The show's already packed so it's going to be crazy. That doesn't even count. What's going to happen overnight. President Trump is driving this in every different direction. A 30 front war and they're trying to stop him in every direction. Whether that's politically on Capitol Hill, whether it's in the media, whether it's in the courts, all over. And now the Chinese Communist Party in a major throwdown. Make sure get smart about precious metals, get smart about gold. Just take your phone out now. Abandoned at 989-898. Just get the free brochure. Investing in gold in the era of Trump. You need to learn what's going on. Futures of gold, another all time high as we end the show today. Want to talk about that tomorrow morning? I'm sure markets are going to be on fire overnight in Asia and in Europe. In the futures. We'll bring it all to you. We'll leave you with the right stuff. We'll see you back here at 10:00am Eastern Daylight Time tomorrow.

[Julie Kelly]

Health isn't just a personal issue. It's a family issue, a community issue. We're living in unpredictable times. Supply chains can break down. Hospitals can get Overwhelmed. And let's not even start on the natural disasters. These aren't hypotheticals.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

They're happening.

[Julie Kelly]

You see it here in the war.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Room and we all know it.

[Julie Kelly]

The question is simply, are you ready? That's where Jace comes in. This isn't just a kit. This is a Jace case. It's a lifeline.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

It's a personal supply of prescribed emergency.

[Julie Kelly]

Medications that puts the power back in your hands. Whether it's an unexpected illness or a.

[Stephen K. Bannon]

Global disruption of supply chains, you can.

[Julie Kelly]

Act fast and protect yourself and your loved ones. This February, show them you care in a way that really matters. Be prepared. Get the Jace case today so you'll have the right meds on hand the moment you need them. Visit jacemedical.com and use the code Bannon B A N n o n at checkout for a discount on your order. That's jacemedical.com promo code Bannon. Get the Jace case and do it today.

[I]

Human really trying to fill this gap of quality supplements and of course the beef liver being our flagship products. For those who don't know, beef liver is loaded with highly bioavailable ingredients such as vitamin A, B12, zinc, CoQ10, etc. And because it is 100% grass fed and natural, your body is able to absorb these nutrients far better than taking any other synthetic multivitamin or any other synthetic vitamin in general. So we have some other amazing products, but if you'd like to check us out, you can go to sacredhumanhealth.com and cheers to your health.

[Julie Kelly]

700,000Americans every year. Yes, heart disease is the number one killer every year, year in and year out. Heart disease builds over time. Hypertension, high blood pressure, bad cholesterol, diabetes, all of it affects our heart. A healthy heart is key to being energetic. As we get older, it is never too early to take care of your heart. You see, heart disease sneaks up on us. You can start in your 30s and when this happens, you're at serious works by the time you turn 60. If you want to take care of your heart and those you care about, please go to war roomhealth.com that's war room health.com all one word war roomhealth.com use the code war room at checkout to save 67% of your first shipment. That's code war room at checkout to save sixty seven percent and do it again. War room health all one word war roomhealth dot com go there today. You need if you're going to be part of the posse. You need a strong heart. You need a lion's heart. How we're going to do that is with Salty. Go there, do it today. Check it out.