Transcript
Steve Bannon (0:03)
This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies because we're going medieval on these people. You're just not going to free shot all these networks lying about the people. The people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you try to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen.
Ben Harnwell (0:24)
And where do people like that go to share the big lie? MAGA MEDIA I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.
Steve Bannon (0:34)
Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.
Stephen K. Bannon (0:44)
War room here's your host, Stephen K. Band.
Ben Harnwell (0:54)
Good evening. Wednesday 18th of June, Anno Domini 2025. Harnwell here at the helm. So we've got a packed show for you guys today. We're going to be going to Detroit to talk about the suppression, the further ongoing suppression of traditional Catholicism. We'll be hitting that with Frank Water, Frank Walker a little later on the show, San Francisco, where we'll be discussing with Jenny Holland. Frank Francis Collins is on the church speaking circuit. Yes. And it is that Francis Collins of COVID Frame. We'll also be going out with Liz your to discuss what's going on over it with our friends the Southern Baptist and their convention in Dallas. Some good news coming out from there last week. But first, Brandon Showalter from the Christian Post. Brandon, welcome onto the show again. I you've got some good news. Breaking news coming out of the Supreme Court today. John Roberts seems to be the head of a 6, 3 majority here discussing, I think, allowing a Tennessee law that prohibited transgender meddling, biological, medical meddling on youth. And the Supreme Court has upheld that. Tell me, Brandon, what are the implications of this and what exactly did the the Supreme Court decide? Because I know that Justice Sotomayor did a little bit of showboating and took the unusual step of actually reading out from the bench her dissenting opinion. But first, tell us what the Supreme Court said and then I think I think other states as well, some 20, 28 or so other states have similar laws on the statute book. Tell us a bit then about what the Supreme Court said and what the implications of that are for the rest of the United States.
Brandon Showalter (2:51)
It's an absolutely huge ruling, Ben, landmark, if I must say. The supreme court, in a 6 to 3 ruling just out this morning, and it was spearheaded by Chief Justice John Roberts, allowed Tennessee's law to prohibit the chemical and surgical transing of minors to stand, saying that it did not violate the 14th Amendment. And basically what that means, it was an equal protection case. And so whether or not, quote, unquote, transgender minors constituted a special category that would rise to the level of strict scrutiny as required by the law. So the implications of this are absolutely massive. And I thought Justice Thomas had a great concurrence when he said that basically he was demolishing the supposed experts and say when you've got an evolving field of medicine, you don't really know. There's so much that's unknown. You have to defer to the people who are making the laws, like the legislator. This was part of Justice Roberts argument during oral arguments as well, that there's so much that is unknown about this. And the justices in black robes are not doctors. And so in his concurrence, Justice Thomas skewered the supposed experts, namely what you think of as wpath, who hold themselves out the World Professional association of Transgender Health, those types who hold themselves out as experts, when in fact they are activists. And so this was a rebel rebuke of activist medicine. Justice Barrett also had a very good concurrence. I know there have been people in the war room posse that haven't been so keen on Justice Barrett's rulings of late, but on this she was fantastic. And it's a six to three decisive decision. And of course, predictably, the leftist justices on the bench, including Sotomayor, are dissenting from this case. But it is hard to overstate, Ben, how enormous this is because this is a huge precedent setting legal blow against the child castration industry. And it's not overstating it to call it that. This is, this is a great day. This is a substantive win. The opinion didn't go as far as it could have gone. And it does use some language that I don't use in terms of labeling people transgender, when in fact that itself is a falsehood. You can't be the other sex. But I noticed that it also avoided the euphemism. And I love that they did this gender affirming care. They call it sex transition procedures. I thought that was very interesting. All in all, this is a very good ruling, A very good day. Bravo to the Supreme Court. Bravo to Attorney General Scremetti and his team in Tennessee. And there's many, many people who prayed for this day and worked hard to see this day happen. And yes, now the 20 odd states, I think 26 or 27 states that have put some kind of ban in place, those laws will be allowed to stand, and that's huge.
