WarRoom Battleground EP 810: One Year Ago Today The Release OF Peter Navarro

Summary

Podcast Summary: Bannon's War Room – Episode 810: One Year Ago Today The Release Of Peter Navarro

Introduction

In Episode 810 of Bannon's War Room, titled "One Year Ago Today The Release Of Peter Navarro," host Steve Bannon delves into significant political and economic discussions surrounding former White House advisor Peter Navarro. The episode commemorates the one-year anniversary of Navarro's unprecedented release from federal prison and explores the broader implications of his incarceration and subsequent release on the current political landscape.

Key Discussions and Topics

1. Peter Navarro’s Imprisonment and Release

   • Steve Bannon’s Opening Remarks ([00:12]): Bannon expresses deep disapproval of Navarro’s imprisonment, labeling it as "a disgrace."

   • Peter Navarro’s Promotion ([00:16] & [00:24]): Navarro briefly mentions his imprisonment, attributing it to his loyalty to President Trump, and promotes his book, "I Went to Prison So You Won't Have To," urging listeners to support his narrative of standing against "lawfare" and corruption.

   • David Bozell’s Insight ([02:22]): Bozell emphasizes the significance of Navarro’s book title, explaining that Navarro’s imprisonment serves as a warning to others defending the Constitution. He underscores the alleged weaponization of the justice system by partisan Democrats, highlighting figures like Comey, Clapper, and others as key players in this perceived corruption.

2. Economic Policies and Tariffs

   • Discussion on Tariffs ([05:17] - [07:08]): The panel critiques the effectiveness of tariffs implemented under the Biden administration, arguing that they have not succeeded in raising prices or significantly impacting the economy. Bozell provides economic data, noting that inflation indicators like CPI and PPI have remained below expectations, indicating a deflationary trend. He highlights the success of tariffs in generating revenue for the IRS, citing over $100 billion collected.

   • First Step Act ([04:05] & [07:08]): Bannon mentions the First Step Act, a significant piece of legislation initially passed during the Trump administration. The panel discusses the Biden administration's failure to implement it, suggesting political motivations to undermine Trump's economic legacy.

3. Media Critique: NPR and PBS Funding

   • David Bozell on Media Funding ([10:46] - [15:04]): Bozell outlines a long-standing campaign by the Media Research Center (MRC) to defund left-leaning public broadcasters like NPR and PBS. He attributes recent successes to strategic political maneuvers and legislative actions, praising Senator Eric Schmidt of Missouri for his role in blocking amendments to protect these institutions. Bozell expresses skepticism about the sustainability of NPR and PBS without taxpayer funding, predicting their eventual decline due to high operational costs.

   • Jane Zirkel’s Investigation ([13:31] - [15:04]): Zirkel presents a case study on NPR’s inaction during the Kerrville, Texas floods. She claims that NPR failed to provide essential emergency broadcasting services, undermining their purported role as a vital local news source. This incident, according to Zirkel, exemplifies the inefficacy and unreliability of NPR in critical times.

4. Deep State and Influence on Science and Technology

   • Jane Zirkel on Epstein’s Influence ([27:15] - [40:27]): Zirkel discusses revelations about Jeffrey Epstein's extensive influence over American science and technology. She references Eric Weinstein’s claims that Epstein acted as an intelligence asset, steering scientific research and fostering connections among prominent intellectuals and technologists. Zirkel warns of a "dystopian" trajectory influenced by these hidden networks, suggesting that many leading scientists and technologists may be complicit in shaping policies that undermine democratic principles.

5. Peter Navarro and Naomi Wolf’s Anniversary Speech

   • Navarro and Wolf’s Speech ([41:54] - [53:25]): The episode features a prerecorded speech marking the one-year anniversary of Navarro’s release. Naomi Wolf narrates her experience of imprisonment, attributing it to political persecution by Democrats. She draws parallels with Donald Trump’s potential targeting, urging listeners to remain vigilant. Wolf criticizes various government branches for overreach, highlighting issues like border security, inflation, and the indoctrination of children. The speech serves as a rallying cry for the MAGA movement, emphasizing resilience and continued resistance against perceived governmental abuses.

Notable Quotes

• Steve Bannon ([00:12]): "I think it's a shame. I think it's a disgrace."

• David Bozell ([02:22]): "The fact that I went to jail, that you went to jail for defending the Constitution, I think shown a very bright light to the American people on the fact that partisan Democrats were weaponizing our justice system."

• David Bozell ([05:37]): "We are in a deflationary mode. Here's an interesting stat for you Steve. Gas today at about three bucks a gallon when you adjust for inflation over the years is at the lowest in terms of purchasing power."

• Jane Zirkel ([13:31]): "We did a deep dive into NPR's local affiliate down there in Kerrville, Texas as the floods were unfolding... they were totally missing in action during an emergency in a rural setting."

• Naomi Wolf ([42:06]): "I'm here with you in this beautiful city of Milwaukee. I've got a very simple message for you. If they can come for me, if they can come for Donald Trump, be careful."

Insights and Conclusions

• Justice System Allegations: The episode strongly conveys the belief that the justice system is being manipulated by partisan Democrats to target and imprison loyal Trump supporters like Peter Navarro and Naomi Wolf. This narrative suggests a deep-seated corruption aimed at suppressing dissent and maintaining political power.

• Economic Performance Under Trump: Highlighting economic indicators, the panel argues that Trump's tariff policies have been more effective than critics suggest, with low inflation rates and significant revenue generation for the IRS. This serves to bolster the argument for continuing Trump-era economic strategies.

• Media Accountability: By scrutinizing NPR and PBS, the episode underscores a broader attempt to delegitimize public media as biased and ineffective. The panel's assertions aim to diminish the influence of these institutions and shift public perception towards skepticism of their role in democratic discourse.

• Influence of Epstein in Science and Technology: Through Jane Zirkel’s in-depth analysis, the podcast posits that Jeffrey Epstein’s network had a far-reaching impact on American scientific and technological advancement. This theory links Epstein’s influence to current issues in surveillance, AI, and digital currency, painting a picture of a manipulated trajectory driven by hidden agendas.

• Call to Action and Resilience: The anniversary speech by Navarro and Wolf serves as a motivational piece, urging listeners to remain steadfast in their support for Trump and the MAGA movement. It emphasizes the importance of vigilance against governmental overreach and politicized justice, positioning the audience as active participants in safeguarding their freedoms.

Conclusion

Episode 810 of Bannon's War Room presents a fervent exploration of political persecution, economic policy critique, and media discrediting within the framework of supporting the Trump administration and the MAGA movement. Through personal narratives, economic data, and investigative claims, the episode seeks to galvanize listeners against perceived deep-state threats and advocate for continued resistance and support for Trump’s legacy.

Relevant Timestamps and Speakers

• Steve Bannon: Host, moderator of discussions, and commentator on various topics.

• Peter Navarro: Former White House advisor, author, discusses his imprisonment and book.

• Naomi Wolf: Political commentator, shares her experiences and perspectives on governmental overreach.

• David Bozell: Representative from Media Research Center, provides insights on media funding and economic policies.

• Jane Zirkel: Journalist and reporter, investigates media effectiveness and Epstein’s influence on science.

Final Thoughts

For listeners seeking a comprehensive understanding of the narratives supporting the MAGA movement, the struggles against perceived political persecution, and critiques of current economic and media landscapes, Episode 810 offers a detailed and impassioned perspective. The inclusion of firsthand accounts, coupled with data-driven arguments, aims to reinforce the listeners' resolve in their political beliefs and actions.

Transcript

[Steve Bannon]

I think it's a shame. I think it's a disgrace.

[Peter Navarro]

Peter Navarro went to prison for standing with President Trump.

[Naomi Wolf]

They demanded that I break the law. I refused.

[Peter Navarro]

Now he's telling all I went to prison so you won't have to. It's his gripping true story of love, lawfare and exposure causing corruption behind bars. Stand with Peter. Scan the QR code now or go to Amazon.com to order your copy.

[Naomi Wolf]

I went to prison, so you won't have to.

[Steve Bannon]

Peter Navarro joins us. We're going to have David Bozell, Naomi Wolf, Jane Zirkel also in the remainder of this hour. A lot going on. There will not be, I don't think it'll be a presser at 7 o' clock now at the Capitol regarding this, these threats, these assassination threats on MTG by a employee, Seth Jason, a VOICE of America who has been arrested and indicted in Washington, D.C. judge Janine, by the way, got voted out of committee today. So did Emil Bovey, although there was a fracas about Bovies. We'll get to all that in a little while. Peter Navarro, why is and look, you're beloved by this audience. You were co host for years. You preach the gospel of Trump, of maganomics. Both your books were big bestsellers with this audience piling in. This book is quite different and we're in a different time. I think it's ironic that, you know, a year after you spoke at the rnc, came out of prison when the first time ever a guy comes out of prison goes mainstage, speaks at the rnc. And, and basically a year after the assassination attempt on President Trump, we're in this situation where it doesn't look like we're making a ton of progress of taking down of all the other accomplishments of the administration. And they are legion, particularly on the economic side. It doesn't look like we're very far advanced in taking down the deep state. So why should people buy this book and why should they buy it and read it now.

[David Bozell]

Steve, the title of the book, I think says the answer to that question, I went to prison. So you won't have to. There's a line at the end of the speech in Milwaukee. And what I meant by that, Steve, is that the fact that I went to jail, that you went to jail for defending the Constitution, I think shown a very bright light to the American people on the fact that partisan Democrats were weaponizing our justice system in a way that threatens to take away the freedom not just of you and I and of President Trump. And he would be in jail right now if we had lost that election, but of everybody who stands up for what's right and good in America. And so the book itself is a reminder of what can happen when you stand up for what is right. It's a story. It's many stories. A story of what it's like to be in prison, but it's also a story of the scandal, frankly, that I uncovered when I was inside. I didn't go in, whine and hold my head and do a pity party. I rolled my sleeves up, found out that there was a failure, an abject failure of the Biden administration at a policy level to implement President Trump's First Step Act. And I set about trying to fix that. So this book has a lot of things going on, but ultimately it's a reminder, Steve, that you and I and President Trump and everybody watching this could wind up in prison if we let those people be in power and if we don't hold. This is the important thing. Bury the lead. Steve and I often do that. Unfortunately, we got to hold the people accountable for who put us in prison and who went after Donald Trump and tried to put him in prison. You know, the names Comey Clapper, Page, Strzok Brennan. It's. It's Pelosi, It's. It's Benny Thompson. It's Liz Cheney. It's. It's. And the J6ers, Biden himself, the Jason, all of that. And we got to do that. We can't.

[Steve Bannon]

And folks.

[David Bozell]

Yeah.

[Steve Bannon]

And folks. Yeah. And folks understand if we don't do it now.

[David Bozell]

Yeah.

[Steve Bannon]

We're going to rue the day because these people are going to come back and they, they only play hardball.

[Jane Zirkel]

They.

[Unknown]

Peter, I want to have.

[Steve Bannon]

I'm a bifurcate this. I want to have you back. Maybe we'll get Jared on the great. I don't think people understand the really the brilliance of the First Step act. And you're absolutely correct. The First Step Act President Trump got passed in, I think 1920. 1920 was an incredible piece of legislation. The Biden regime specifically did not put it into effect because of the political implications that have for President Trump. We'll do that on a separate day. One only one economic question. We play your clips when you're talking to all the big shots out there which are great.

[Unknown]

Does there's the price situation today.

[Steve Bannon]

Prove the lie that that the tariffs, which are 1. Bringing jobs back to. If they're not bringing jobs back to bringing. The External Revenue Service has got over $100 billion. Have we finally proven the lie that they're not going to raise, they're not going to raise prices substantially, sir.

[David Bozell]

Steve, we had five months now with Jerome Powell refusing to lower interest rates on the grounds that the tariffs were going to cause inflation. We've had five months in a row where the inflation report, CPI and PPI have consistently below expectations. We're in a deflationary mode. Here's an interesting stat for you Steve. I don't know if you know this but gas today at about three bucks a gallon when you adjust for inflation over the years is at the lowest in terms of purchasing power. It's been in any for any modern president. It's that low and it's down about 40% since we took office. Eggs are down I don't know $2.50 a dozen. And the CEA the Council of Economic Advisors came up with a fascinating report showing that import prices are actually going down even as we gather $100 billion in money from the tariffs themselves. So it's look the best thing here Steve is that the first term provide us with the receipts they all same people who are saying the tariffs are going to be inflationary or cause a recession said it the first time around. You can just do cold opens all day long with them from circa 2018, 2019. It didn't happen not going to happen this time either. So yeah Trump is the is the tariff king and yeah he's like he.

[Steve Bannon]

Loves the TV he's gone far beyond.

[Unknown]

McKinley the teamwork the team Hang on.

[Steve Bannon]

Yeah go ahead. Go ahead.

[Naomi Wolf]

No.

[Steve Bannon]

Peter, no one no one in the West Wing state no no one in the West Wing stays as is monopoly focus of staying in his lane I would talk to people says no that's not my lane. I'm staying in my lane. I've noticed you've been going after and I'm just throwing this out there for discussion in the chats I've noticed you specifically have been going and particularly been going after too late Powell probably harder than President Trump.

[Unknown]

Are you angling for the Fed chair? Are you are you trying to are you trying to get are you trying.

[Steve Bannon]

To steal a march on Kevin Borscht.

[Unknown]

Should has it should has hit Wash.

[Steve Bannon]

And Scott Bess be worried that you're.

[Unknown]

Stealing your because your guy stays in his lane and you're taking a lot of shots Taking a lot of shots.

[David Bozell]

Well but here's what's the difference between me and everybody else besides Donald Trump with respect to taking shots at Jay Powell. I've been doing this since 2018 and 2019. Okay. And when Biden was in office, I was taking shots simply because. And you know, Steve, I deliver the receipts. I look three major policy errors in six years which have cost this country billions and billions and billions of dollars in hardship. So, no, who's the famous Roman general who went back with the plow?

[Unknown]

Right?

[Steve Bannon]

You know I'm talking about Cincinnatus.

[David Bozell]

I'm Cincinnatus, baby. I got a plow waiting in Palm beach for me with my beautiful fiance, Bonnie. As soon as I'm done with. With this man, you ain't getting me back for anything, baby.

[Steve Bannon]

Okay, you're going.

[David Bozell]

I might guest host every once in a while in Palm beach with the Sig brothers there and all that stuff. They're great, great folks.

[Steve Bannon]

Well, let's, let's, let's sell some books. One more time. Where do they go?

[David Bozell]

All right, one more time. This is important.

[Steve Bannon]

You don't have to. Where they go?

[David Bozell]

Yeah.

[Naomi Wolf]

Look at this cover.

[David Bozell]

And this is my beautiful girl here. This is from when we were on the stage at, at the convention. I went to prison so you won't have to. It's available on Amazon now. We want to drive this thing right up to number one so that the New York Times can't deny us best seller status. Would prove that they can't censor us. And Steve, I do have to thank you for your forward. And it may well be better than anything that's in the book, but the book's pretty damn good.

[Steve Bannon]

Well, the Ford came from the heart because you're like a brother to me. And Bonnie's like a. Almost like a sister. She's so great. Peter, thank you for coming on. I know it's tough to break away from the White House, but thank you, and you can go back to work. Thank you, brother.

[David Bozell]

Always a pleasure being with you, Steve. You take care, brother.

[Steve Bannon]

Senior adviser to the president and his tariff adviser. President Trump's getting these tariffs, Peter, on manufacturing, as you know, for years here as a co host. Historic day all around. Historic day. We had Russ vote on to start the day. And I want to get David Bozell on here to kind of wrap it up. David, here's the question. Talk to us about this has been a long, I don't know, 20, 30 year process that your group Media Research center has focused on why. Why we fund with taxpayer money, a left wing progressive news service that does nothing but go after conservatives, President Trump, the MAGA movement. Finally today, we got our comeuppance. Why has it taken it so long, sir? And why is this so important?

[Unknown]

Well, why is it taking us so long? First and foremost, they've had Big Bird to rely on for. So up until HBO bought Big Bird about three or four years ago, every time Republicans got close, Steve, to getting this across the finish line, Big Bird and Elmo would show up in a congressional hearing. And no Republican ever wanted to have an ad in their district come reelection time saying he voted to kill Big Bird. So that was kind of the chief reason why this never got across the finish line. But I just have to thank press. Take this form to thank President Trump for honoring his promise. Every Republican nominee, every Republican president before him has pledged to do this to get rid of NPR and pbs. He stuck to his guns. He did it. I wanted you mentioned Russ, man. Russ comes up with this idea for rescissions. We've been trying to figure out when was the last time. I didn't even know what rescissions meant when I first heard this word in early spring. Hasn't been used since 1972. Score one for Conservative Incorporated Heritage. Helped out America's Principal Process with Terry center for Renewing America, Russ's old shop, Conservative Partnership Institute for America. Everyone banded together to get rid of this thing. This has been a 40 year quest to get rid of this taxpayer funded propaganda. I wished NPR and PBS the very best of luck in the open market. I really, really do. I hope they hope they get everything that they can get to survive. I have a funny feeling that they are not going to survive for fortune for, for, for too terribly long, particularly at their price point with all these assets. I mean, they've got 11 studios, 11 studios in Washington D.C. alone. They have 42 studios in Alaska, 42 in the state of Alaska. So we hope we're going to go push after getting rid of these assets and selling them off. And so that's going to be an important deal for us. But I was teasing my father, Brent. All it took for it was for him to step down as president of Media Reservation Center. Then this came about two months later. So if he stepped down 38 years ago, we may have been here a lot sooner.

[Steve Bannon]

Your father's a great man and he's been on this crusade a long time.

[Unknown]

How do you answer today they threw.

[Steve Bannon]

Up at the last second in the debate and we got to give a hat tip to all those organizations and particularly Senator Eric Schmidt of Missouri that really went out of his way and stood up, I think for 24 hours. Beaten back amendments.

[Unknown]

How do you answer the question.

[Steve Bannon]

Well, this is terrible because, you know, maga's all rural and these folks aren't going to get rural news. You can't get rural news. None of the rural communities are going to be serviced because NPR and PBS are not going to be out there in rural America. It's, quite frankly, it's never an argument I've heard, but it's one they're throwing up. Your responsor.

[Unknown]

Kerrville, Texas. We did a deep dive into NPR's local affiliate down there in Kerrville, Texas as the floods were unfolding. And this was, this was a claim that NPR made in their closing argument. They're the only ones that could provide an emergency beacon to a local rural community. They were missing in action. Kerrville, Texas, totally missing in action. And in fact, Texas Public Broadcasting System had the audacity to, to put out on Facebook a plea for its followers to call their senators and congressmen to preserve their funding for the purposes of preserving their emergency broadcast system within the NPR apparatus. They put out the social media post while the floods were beginning in earnest. Okay. And they were nowhere to be found. In fact, Kerrville Police Department in Texas confirmed to the Media Research center that they did every single, the spokesman down there, they did every single private radio show that they could get their hands on in and around Kerrville County. You know who never called Kerrville police for an interview? Ktxi, the NPR affiliate down there. They were totally missing in action during an emergency in a rural setting. So the argument never just didn't really fly their local programming. I know they like to say that they were, you know, the only bastion for local programming. Only 5% of NPR's entire apparatus was devoted to local programming nationwide. It was, it was, it's a, it's a total lie. Most of all, their programming was beamed out from Boston, New York, Philadelphia.

[Steve Bannon]

Yeah. Which really plays the world communities. David, your father was going to head up VOA and then the whole thing, the global media. Then he's gone to be the ambassador to South Africa. So Kerry's over there and of course we had this situation today as, as we go forward and Russ has said we're going to do more rescissions. President Trump says, look, I want to get all this, you know, she's taken VOA down to its deck plates Media Research Center. Where else are you guys going to be pointing that we should include in future rescissions packages other wasteful media spending basically as left wing media that taxpayers are paying for, sir.

[Unknown]

Yeah, well, well, the taxpayers are Paying for. Well, one of the things that we've got a really keen eye on, Steve, I want to look really deep in Apple News, Google News, Yahoo News, and Microsoft. Okay, These are all outlets that are coming by default on, on our cell phones and devices nowadays. And a lot of folks particularly, you know, some of our seasoned audience are looking at Apple News sort of by default. I mean, they're not, they're not logging onto X and creating accounts. They're not logging onto Instagram and creating accounts. So these, these news entities that are, that are basically Google, for example, is getting a lot of its source material, especially in Gemini, from Wikipedia, of all things. So Media Research center is definitely going to take a look at this and make sure, if we have to, if we need to do to Apple News what we've done to Emmett, to NBC and MSNBC and create that public backlash against their presentation, then we'll do it.

[Steve Bannon]

David, how do people get you on social media? We know you guys got a lot going on. And how did they get over to, to, to crc? The MRC particularly, you got different venues. You're putting up news all the time. It's a great news page. Where do people go?

[Unknown]

Yeah, the MRC is the, is the main X account. Come on, you know, go to the mrc.org website, smash the donate button if you can. NewsBusters.org is the news analysis operation. Free Speech America is the grassroots division of the operation. So Those are the three main entities. MRC, NewsBusters, Free Speech America.

[Steve Bannon]

Your NewsBusters guys are great. Always got.

[Unknown]

I got to tip my cap to Tim Graham, Brent Baker, Dan Schneider. These guys have been working like dogs to get this across the finish line. So kudos to all those guys.

[Steve Bannon]

Incredible team, including especially Dan Schneider. Love that guy. David, thank you so much for being on here, brother.

[Unknown]

Thanks, brother. Anytime, man. Take it easy.

[Steve Bannon]

Yes, sir. His father, one of the legends, has been after PBS and NPR for decade after decade. Finally, President Trump comes up with a way. And that fight was intense. Eric Schmidt, the senator from Missouri, gets a real hat tip there, but it was huge. The Democrats knew if one got through, a bunch are going to get through. And they're back working on another rescissions package even as we speak. Naomi and I want to make sure Grace and Mo put this up. You wrote a fascinating piece. I want you to lay it out right now, even as you speak. There's a donnybrook up on Capitol Hill because some Republicans are joining with Democrats to say, hey, we want, we're going to have an amendment here or we're going to pass something that the House wants to basically release all the Epstein Epstein files. So tell us about your article.

[Jane Zirkel]

Sure. And it does take kind of a minute or two to lay it out. Well, basically, I felt the need to write this article showing a part of what may be kind of around this decision about releasing or not releasing the Epstein files based on what I knew to be true from previous years of my own life. And it was triggered by a. An interview that Eric Weinstein, who's the Harvard trained mathematician who till 2022 was the managing director of Teal Capital, gave to a podcast. It's been viewed 2.4 million times. He gave it just a few days ago. And in it, he was describing something that I'm very familiar with, and I will tell you in a minute why. But what he was describing is a situation in which it's like another flank of the Epstein story that has gotten very little attention, but I think it's very important. And he was describing a situation in which there was almost a lure set up at Harvard by Epstein. Harvard kind of facilitated meetings between Epstein and many, many key professors, especially in mathematics and in the sciences, computational science, psychiatry, consciousness, and also gave Epstein an office in an institute, a mathematics institute that Epstein helped to fund. Epstein gave Harvard $9 million. And Weinstein, Eric Weinstein was asking the question on his podcast, why did Epstein know about my work? Who sent him to essentially follow me? The other thing that Weinstein brought up, I knew to be true, which was kind of larger than just Harvard and what I know to be true. And so listening to Eric Weinstein felt very familiar and recognizable to me. Very important. Eric Weinstein was basically saying all of these leading intellectuals who were kind of caught in the Epstein web, right? Innocent and guilty. We. We don't know. But there was kind of a facilitation of contact with Epstein and all of these absolutely key intellectuals in key areas that kind of fast forward became our world in its most dystopian aspect. They were kind of gathered together in multiple venues. One of these venues was Harvard, as I mentioned. One of them was my former agent, John Brockman. And John Brockman has been my agent my whole career until 2019. He's also the agent of many luminaries in the science world. And he convened something called edge.org which was a very kind of elevated platform in which he had all of these leading lights ask each other questions, address philosophical issues. Pretty exciting, very energetic intellectual community. This larger community included people like the Harvard Math professor Martin Nowak, distinguished people, the cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary scientist, the anthropologist Mary Kathryn Bateson, theoretical physicist Marie Gell Mann, Elaine Pagel's the gnostic gospel scholar. So it was these extraordinary intellectuals. Well, no one knew, at least no one I knew knew that Epstein was funding this foundation. So that's really interesting because again, the people they were tapping became the direction that science and culture took in the subsequent 15 years. I mean really what your contributor who talks about transhumanism would really recognize now, that in itself wouldn't be so huge. Except Eric Weinstein pointed out that in his view Epstein. I can't assess this. I have no idea. In Eric Weinstein's view, Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset. And that what Epstein was doing along with or in alliance a construct, as Eric Weinstein put it, the kind of air essentially of Robert Maxwell's having bought Pergamon Press, which was the major science imprint, which then was bought by Elsevier, which is now the major science imprint and a leading manufacturer of the COVID et cetera, vaccine narrative. What Eric Weinstein claimed, and it sounded very right to me, is that Epstein, in addition to everything else we know about that Epstein was steering science, directing and steering and gatekeeping science, or this construct, as Eric Weinstein put it, of Epstein and whoever was running him. Well, let's add a piece to that. And we know that he was funding many of these people. In about 2010, John Brockman began to host really renowned dinners called initially Millionaires Dinners and then Billionaires dinners. He did this sometimes in concert with the TED conference. And what he did there was he brought together these intellectuals in computational science and pre AI in evolutionary biology in genomics, together with the emperors and empresses of the tech world of Silicon Valley. So then, like one example in 2010, it's kind of amazing, in one room this entity funded by Epstein, convened Amazon's Jeff Bezos, then Google's Marissa Mayer, Craig Venter, who sequenced the human genome. Susan Wojcicki, who later was CEO of YouTube Nathan Mirifold, former CTO of Microsoft, who then founded Intellectual Ventures, which is of course the ground zero of funding and investment in Silicon Valley. Interestingly, the inventor of the PCR test, Kerry Mullis, I have no idea what to make of that. And then year after year, Arianna Huffington, later Sergey Brin, the co founder of Google and the co founder of Microsoft, Paul Allen and Tony Fadell, the father of the ipod. Well, so there was this kind of.

[Steve Bannon]

Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on. Just stick right there. We're gonna hold you through the break. Quite fascinating. People should know that John Brockman is an institution in and of himself, one of the major, I would say institutions in not just science, but the writing of science and technology and making sure it gets out disseminated out to the populace. Short, short Commercial break the Dollar versus Gold Dollars under Assault the BRICS nations understand this. This is why they've started a massive de dollarization program. President Trump has put them on notice. You're going to get a 10% tariff if you go along with this. I think as Peter Navarro these guys think it through, a lot of these folks are going to get tariffs because 10% because he's already done it to Brazil. Now a big part of that's caused of Bolsonaro but some of that is because they hosted the BRICS conference in Rio. You can go find out everything about that in the Rio reset. Birchgold.com Bannon the end of the Dollar Empire We've only been right about this for four years now. Make sure you understand not the price of gold today, but the process of what drives the price of gold. Once you understand that, you will understand why it's been a hedge against times of financial turbulence and particularly now, as mtg said since 1971 we really went off the gold standard by President Nixon, why it's been a hedge and so far in the 21st century one of.

[Unknown]

The best performing financial assets.

[Steve Bannon]

Don't take it from me.

[Unknown]

Talk to Philip Patrick and the team at Birchgold.

[Steve Bannon]

Do it today. Naomi Warf, Jane Zirkel on the other side.

[Unknown]

This July there is a global summit of BRICS nations in Rio de Janeiro. The bloc of emerging superpowers including China, Russia, India and Persia are meeting with the goal of displacing the United States dollar as the global currency. They're calling this the Rio Reset. As BRICS nations push forward with their plans, global demand for US dollars will decrease, bringing down the value of the dollar in your savings. While this transition won't not happen overnight, but trust me, it's going to start in Rio. The Rio Reset in July marks a pivotal moment when BRICS objectives move decisively from a theoretical possibility towards inevitable reality. Learn if diversifying your savings into gold.

[Steve Bannon]

Is right for you.

[Unknown]

Birch Gold Group can help you move your hard earned savings into a tax sheltered IRA and precious metals claim your free info kit on gold by texting my name Bannon. That's B A N N O N to 989-898 with an A plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers. Let Birchgold army with a free no obligation info kit on owning gold before July and the Rio reset text Bannon B A N N O N to 989-898. Do it today. That's the Rio reset text Bannon at 989898 and do it today. If you're a homeowner, you need to listen to this. In today's AI and cyber world, scammers are stealing home titles with more ease than ever. And your equity is the target. Here's how it works. Criminals forge your signature on one document, use a fake notary stamp, pay small fee with your county, and boom. Your home title has been transferred out of your name. Then they take out loans using your equity or even sell your property. You won't even know it's happened until you get a collection or foreclosure foreclosure notice. So let me ask you, when was the last time you personally checked your home title? If you're like me, the answer is never. And that's exactly what scammers are counting on. That's why I trust Home title lock. Use promo code steveometitle.com to make sure your title is still in your name. You also get a free title history report, plus a free 14 day trial of their million dollar triple lock protection. That's 24,7 monitoring of your tit urgent alerts to any changes. And if fraud should happen, they'll spend up to $1 million to fix it. Go to hometitle lock.com now. Use promo code Steve. That's hometitle lock.com promo code Steve, do it today. What if he had the brightest mind.

[Steve Bannon]

In the war room, delivering critical financial research every month? Steve Bannon here. War room listeners know Jim Rickards. I love this guy.

[Unknown]

He's our wise man. A former CIA, Pentagon and White House advisor with an unmatched grasp of geopolitics and capital markets, Jim predicted Trump's Electoral College victory exactly 312 to 226, down to the actual number itself. Now he's issuing a dire warning about April 11, a moment that could define Trump's presidency and your financial future. His latest book, MoneyGPT, exposes how AI is setting the stage for financial chaos. Bank runs at lightning speeds, algorithm driven crashes and even threats to national security. Right now, War room members get a free copy of MoneyGPT when they sign up for Strategic Intelligence. This is Jim's flagship financial newsletter, Strategic Intelligence. I Read it.

[Steve Bannon]

You should read it.

[Unknown]

Time is running out.

[Steve Bannon]

Go to rickardswarroom.com that's all one word. Rickards war Room.

[Unknown]

Rickards with an S. Go now and claim your free book.

[Steve Bannon]

That's rickardswarroom.com do it today.

[Peter Navarro]

War Room.

[Naomi Wolf]

Here's your host, Stephen K. Ban.

[Steve Bannon]

There's a lot of talk about the midterms. They're doing a redistricting down in Texas. That is they're talking about bringing five seats and they're going we're going to need every seat we can get, folks. I can tell you that I want to give a shout out to Glenn Story and the team in Texas. You know that they are fighting in Tarrant county and Dent and all these places to keep Texas maga. We argue all the time on Patriot Mobile. Stop giving your money to people that hate you and give it to people. Support your values. But the most important thing is the service itself is extraordinary. Go today and make the switch. 972 Patriot or Patriot mobile.com Bannon call Patriot mobile 972 Patriot and you can talk to an American citizen in their customer service department and talk about all the different services they provide. It's an incredible mobile company supporting your values and this great fight for Texas. I tell you folks, we lose Texas, it's all over. Patriot Mobile go check it out today. Naomi, continue on. This is quite fascinating. He basically through Brockman and Harvard. These are. Brockman is at the equivalent of Harvard as far as brands go and particularly in science and technology. He's considered to not have a peer. Also Pergamon Press, the other presses that Maxwell owned, etc. What do you mean though by you believe for the intelligence services or the deep state or the globalist that he had his hand in guiding science and technology?

[Jane Zirkel]

Ma', am, I just want to be really clear. Those were Eric Weinstein's words. I have no knowledge of what Jeffrey Epstein was, but I think what Eric Weinstein is saying is incredibly persuasive because what he's saying is Epstein, whoever was running Epstein and Epstein was obviously bigger than just a financier, right? There's like something was running Epstein just in terms of the air miles and the money. And it's just bigger than any one individual could be. One goal is not just the story that we know about, which is a horrible, horrible story about politicians and retail clothing manufacturers abusing girls. There's an additional kind of dual use story which is about steering science. And if you look at that and I think Eric Weinstein Is right. And if you look at the last 15 years, the direction of these sciences that were tapped by Epstein and Harvard essentially into this network in Brockman and the direction of big tech are the same direction. Right. And I don't know if, you know, I don't know where that's coming from, but I think those are the important questions we need to ask. Like, this is the dystopia we are in now, the surveillance state, transhumanism, you know, constant monitoring, central bank, digital currency, you know, the focus on neuralink, you know, the reading trying to get into people's brains and bodies. These were the people who were identified by Epstein and whoever was running Epstein. So where I'm going with this, I think my essay is a very sympathetic one toward President Trump. I'm, you know, I was raped as a child. I want nothing more than justice for those, all of those victims. I want nothing more than transparency. But my reading between the lines and understanding what I think Eric Weinstein is trying to say leads me to conclude that President Trump is in a really impossible position. Because A, there are innocent as well as guilty. This is my conclusion, my judgment, innocent as well as guilty major scientists, probably in those unreleased records, innocent as well as guilty. And B, there are probably innocent as well as guilty major technologists in those records. I mean, we know some of them are in those records. And I have to note that the major technologists, the Silicon Valley guys, are critical to this administration. So my guess is that I have no knowledge, no one's leaking, no insider anything, just to guess from being a, a former political consultant, but also, B, in this community. Right. My guess is that there are people innocent and guilty. We can't possibly know, but it was a network that swept up all these people, putting pressure on President Trump to not release it. Because all these, you know, all these technologists, all of these scientists were swept up into kind of a. I don't know what to call it, more than a honey trap. Right? I mean, when Harvard did a report on contacts of staff, of professors with Epstein, Harvard was saying they didn't just take his money, they accepted his invitations, they went to his place in New Mexico, they went on his plane, they went to his island. Well, these are, you know, some of them may have done horrible things. I'm not exonerating anyone. We have no idea. But some of them are likely to have been nerdy people, targeted essentially. And this is what I'm hearing Eric Weinstein saying by this operation, swept up into it and compromised. So that innocent or Guilty. They are in a snapshot of contact with Epstein that could destroy them, whatever they did or didn't do. So. So that's what I just think people should be aware of when they're thinking about this. Very distressing.

[Steve Bannon]

We've got to bounce. So are you saying that you agree that the record shouldn't be turned over, or do you think some mechanism ought to be worked out that the records are turned over?

[Jane Zirkel]

I'm not saying either of those things. Look, I always want transparency, and let's not forget that we have the victims right there. They can. They should be supported. They should be speaking. They can, you know, put back on the record everything they want to put back on the record. I believe in transparency. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that there could be something much bigger than we realize here, including a national security problem. And that we. My, my trust is always in citizens. And so I think citizens should just be aware of the larger context, be aware that they're innocent as well as guilty people, probably very likely in those records. Be aware that there was a weird targeting of leading lights of American science, as well as a targeting of technologists, and that created a synthesis which is everything we live in now. And, you know, that's as. That's as far as I can go. I mean, obviously, I think what's really interesting is what Alan Dershowitz said, who was formerly Trump's lawyer and Epstein's lawyer, and Dershowitz gave an interview in which basically he was saying, really, what Pam Bondi should do is put pressure on the New York courts to release the list. And again, as a former political consultant, I get what he's doing. The blowback. What I'm saying is the blowback from the Trump administration releasing whatever lists there are, and no doubt they're voluminous lists of all kinds, is going to be so catastrophic for this administration because his funders, sponsors, supporters, the most powerful network in the world, is probably swept up in this. Innocent and guilty as well as some of the leading scientists of the world. So that's where I want to leave it, you know, and obviously, it would be good if the New York courts released everything with us being.

[Steve Bannon]

I mean, you got to. You, you. You have. You have to approach the New York courts, you have to approach the federal court to release all these sealed evidence, to unseal the documents. That's the first step you have to do. Anyway, there's a lot going on. Special counsel, not special counsel. What's going to happen? President Trump said, hey, if there are documents you can release, she release them up on the Hill right now they're fighting about an entire bill that might. Not that the Hill has a lot of authority here, but to do it. Naomi, where do people go to get all your information and read this and read this essay?

[Jane Zirkel]

Yeah, I do want people to read the essay because it's a nuanced situation and it's over on Outspoken, which is my substack and it's called the Network in the Worlds of the Elite. And you can always find me too, on Daily Clout. And you can always order the Pfizer book, which is very important. And I met Naomi R. Wolfe on X. And thank you, Steve, for letting me share this.

[Steve Bannon]

Thanks. Sure. No, it's very important, very powerful. Brockman, Harvard, all of it. Thank you, Naomi. Okay, we were going to play and I was going to have Jane as a guest to our, as a reporter. Jane did these amazing interviews. We're going to do those tomorrow and Jane's going to join us tomorrow. The great calamity Jane Zirkel. We're going to play, I think it's important today to end and to actually play Peter's entire speech on the one year anniversary of it at the Republican National Committee because here's the Republican National Convention. Here's the disturbing thing. It could be ripped from today's headlines. You just heard Naomi talk about all these different networks and science and technology and all these prominent people and the driving of technology or science in a certain way. The Deep state is winning right now. There's supposed to be a massive declassification of some material. Supposed to be today, maybe tomorrow. But right now, until they identify special counsel to work on that part of it, let alone the Epstein, we're making very little headway. So we're going to play its entirety. One year ago today, almost at this moment, Peter Navarro's speech to Republican National Convention on the day that he left a federal prison, which was unprecedented. Peter Navarro takes it from here. We'll see you back here tomorrow morning, 10:00am Eastern Daily Time. We're going to have Jane on tomorrow night with me to go through her interviews. Let's hear Peter Navarro.

[Naomi Wolf]

This is a beautiful thing.

[David Bozell]

I think you just, yeah, I think.

[Naomi Wolf]

You folks just want to know if.

[David Bozell]

You can see my MAGA tattoo I got there.

[Naomi Wolf]

Yes, indeed, this morning I did walk out of a federal prison in Miami. Me, Joe Biden and his Department of injustice put me there tonight. I'm here with you in this beautiful city of Milwaukee. I'VE got a very simple message for you. If they can come for me, if they can come for Donald Trump, be careful.

[David Bozell]

They will come for you.

[Naomi Wolf]

If we don't control our government, their government will control us. If we don't control all three branches.

[David Bozell]

Of our government, legislative, executive and judicial.

[Naomi Wolf]

Their government will put some of us, like me and Steve Bannon in prison and control the rest of us. Here's how it went. Here's how I got in prison. The legislative branch came for me first. Your favorite Democrat, Nancy Pelosi, created your favorite committee, the sham January Six Committee, which demanded that I violate executive privilege. What did I do? I refused. The J6 committee demanded that I betray Donald John Trump to save my own skin. I refused. Here's the thing about the Constitution. They demanded that I break the law because they have no respect for it. I refused. And a Democrat majority in the House then voted to hold me in contempt. All right, what happened next? The next jackboot to drop was the executive branch. Another one of your favorite Democrats, Democrat Attorney General Merrick Garland. There's a winner. Raymond Jack Smith indicted and prosecuted me for criminal contempt of Congress. Now here's what's wrong weird about it. It's something that Democrat prosecutors refused to do against one of their own, including two guys with blood on their hands, Eric Holder and Alejandro Mayorkas, the great border czar. Right. They've actually gotten people killed for decades.

[David Bozell]

For decades.

[Naomi Wolf]

The Department of Injustice, the Department of Justice policy stated, hear me out on this.

[David Bozell]

If Congress slaps a subpoena on a.

[Naomi Wolf]

Senior White House advisor like me, the advisor's duty is to politely tell them.

[David Bozell]

To go pound sand.

[Naomi Wolf]

That's exactly what I did. So so far we got two branches, legislative and executive power. The judicial branch delivered the final blow just as. Here's another favorite of yours. Just as Democrat Judge Juan Marchand, you know, this guy did to Donald John Trump in his Manhattan kangaroo court. Another Democrat judge, a guy named Ahmed Mehta. Keep your eye on this guy. Ahmed made an Obama appointee. They stripped me of every possible defense.

[David Bozell]

And then what?

[Naomi Wolf]

Just like in Manhattan with Donald Trump.

[David Bozell]

They threw me to the wolves of.

[Naomi Wolf]

An anti Trump jury in where the D.C. swamp. They convicted me, they jailed me.

[David Bozell]

Guess what?

[Naomi Wolf]

They did not break me. And they will never break Donald Trump. They will never break Donald Trump. All right, now here's the most important thing I'm going do to tell you. You may be thinking this couldn't happen to you. Mm.

[David Bozell]

Mm.

[Naomi Wolf]

Make no mistake, they're already coming for you. Joe and Kamala they threw out the woke blue carpet across the Rio Grande, opened our borders to what? Murderers and rapists. When Donald Trump said it. Thank you for saying that. When Donald Trump said murder is raped, rapists in 2016, they go, oh, racist, whatever. We read the papers. It's murderers and rapists, murderers and rapists, drug cartels, human traffickers, terrorists, Chinese spies and. And a whole army of illiterate eagle illegal aliens stealing the jobs of black, brown and blue collar Americans. They put them right on your front doorstep. Now here's another thing. Joe Biden, you got to love this. The green new scam. We're in the heart here in Milwaukee, around all this is where the auto industry, that new scam is destroying our industry, leaving us at the mercy of the battery factories in Shanghai and slave labor in the Congo. Biden inflation.

[David Bozell]

You're going to hear a lot of this because it's so frigging true.

[Naomi Wolf]

Biden inflation is coming after what's left.

[David Bozell]

Of your savings and eating your wages.

[Naomi Wolf]

In the Democrats. Here's the thing. I'm sitting in prison thinking about this. It just eats at me. As the Democrats come for your kids, they're indoctrinating them with poisonous attitudes on race and gender. And here's the thing. When politics fails, the investigations and prosecutions begin. They did it to me, they're going to do it to Trump. But hear me out, they've also done it to Catholics, pro life activists and parents. Parents who are just standing up for.

[David Bozell]

The kids at school board meetings.

[Naomi Wolf]

This is a tale of two Americas. And you know, it wasn't this way when Donald Trump was president. I remember the days I was there. In Trump's America, you were safe and our borders were secure. In Trump's America, you were more prosperous and you didn't have to choose between what food on the table, medicine in the cabinet and a roof over your head. And in Trump's America, you didn't have to worry about being locked up for.

[David Bozell]

Disagreeing with the government.

[Naomi Wolf]

I went to prison so you won't have to. I am your wake up call. All right, this is where I'm going to have fun now, because I'm going to leave you now with the last three words. The last three words my beautiful fiance said when I left that morning for prison.

[David Bozell]

They weren't, I love you.

[Naomi Wolf]

That was a given. She simply said, we got this. We got this. That's what.

[David Bozell]

Bring my girl out now.

[Naomi Wolf]

That's what these law fair jackals don't understand. When they put people like me in prison and fire figurative and now literal bullets at Donald Trump. They also assault our families. On election Day, America will hold these lawfare jackals accountable. Now here's the sweetest thing that's going to come off my lips. Vote Trump. Vance 24. For Trump 47, I'm Peter Navarro. I went to prison so you won't have to. This is my beautiful girl. She did the time with me. That's what these frigging Democrats don't understand. They do this to our families. She's my girl. Yeah. I love you. Let's win. Do not let up. Do not let up. Pedal to the metal till November.

[Unknown]

There's a lot of talk about government debt, but after four years of inflation, the real crisis is personal debt. Seriously, you're working harder than ever and you're still drowning in credit card debt and overdue bills. You need Done With Debt, and here's why you need it. The credit system is rigged to keep you trapped. Done With Debt has unique and frankly, brilliant escape strategies to help end your debt fast so you keep more of your hard earned money. Done With Debt doesn't try to sell you a loan and they don't try to sell you a bankruptcy. They're tough negotiators that go one on one with your credit card and loan companies with one goal, to drastically reduce your bills and eliminate interest and erase penalties. Most clients end up with more money in their pocket month one, and they don't stop until they break you free from debt permanently.

[Steve Bannon]

Look, take a couple of minutes and.

[Unknown]

Visit dawnwithdet.com talk with one of their strategists. It's free, but listen up. Some of their solutions are time sensitive, so you'll need to move quickly. Go to donewithdebt.com that's donewithdebt.com Stop the anxiety, stop the angst. Go to donewithdebT.com and do it today.