Monologue: Did OpenAI Steal Another Startup's Idea?

Summary

Better Offline Podcast Summary

Episode: Monologue: Did OpenAI Steal Another Startup's Idea?
Release Date: June 27, 2025
Host: Ed Zitron
Produced by: Cool Zone Media and iHeartPodcasts

---

Overview

In this provocative episode of Better Offline, tech industry veteran Ed Zitron delves into a contentious legal battle involving OpenAI and a startup named IO Products. The monologue dissects allegations of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and potential intellectual property theft, painting a complex picture of corporate maneuvering within the tech landscape.

---

Key Topics Discussed

1. Introduction to the Lawsuit
2. Background of IO Products and OpenAI
3. Details of the Alleged Infringements
4. Responses from the Defendants
5. Ed Zitron’s Analysis and Opinions
6. Implications for the Tech Industry

---

1. Introduction to the Lawsuit

Ed Zitron opens the episode by highlighting recent legal actions taken by IO against OpenAI and key figures associated with the company. He emphasizes the sudden move by OpenAI to retract promotional materials related to its $6.4 billion all-stock acquisition of IO Products, an AI startup known for developing a screenless AI device expected to launch in the following year.

Notable Quote:

"Last week, OpenAI abruptly pulled the promotional materials around, along with any mention of its $6.4 billion all stock acquisition of Joni Ives IO Products..."
[01:12] Ed Zitron

---

2. Background of IO Products and OpenAI

Zitron provides a detailed background of IO Products, tracing its origins to Google X (Google's internal R&D division) in March 2018. The startup was spun out as an independent entity in August 2021, securing $25 million from Google and an additional $37.2 million subsequently. IO Products has been developing the IO1 device, an ear-worn screenless computer, initially slated for a winter 2024 launch but delayed to August 2025.

Notable Quote:

"IO was founded in March 2018 as part of Google X, which is effectively Google's internal Skunk Works R and D division, and was spun out as an independent company in August 2021..."
[02:30] Ed Zitron

---

3. Details of the Alleged Infringements

The core of the lawsuit centers around IO's claims that OpenAI and its affiliates engaged in practices that amounted to trademark infringement and unfair competition. IO alleges that representatives from Sam Altman's venture capital firm, Apollo Projects, met with IO multiple times, gaining access to proprietary information and designs related to their screenless device. Additionally, the similarity in company names—IO Products versus OpenAI's potentially identically named entity—raises suspicions of intentional obfuscation.

Notable Quotes:

"IO also makes the case that these violations weren't a simply unhappy coincidence, but rather a deliberate action."
[03:45] Ed Zitron

"They have the same fucking name."
[07:15] Ed Zitron

---

4. Responses from the Defendants

OpenAI and its affiliates have responded to the lawsuit by denying any malicious intent. They argue that any similarities in naming and product development were coincidental and emphasize that meetings with IO were part of standard business practices. The defendants have sought to downplay the allegations, suggesting that interactions were merely gestures of goodwill or exploratory discussions without any commitment to acquisition or partnership.

Notable Quote:

"The defendants argue that these meetings were harmless."
[06:50] Ed Zitron

---

5. Ed Zitron’s Analysis and Opinions

Throughout the monologue, Zitron interjects his analysis, expressing skepticism about the defendants' claims. He highlights the frequency and timing of the interactions between OpenAI representatives and IO, questioning the plausibility of the defendants' assertions of innocence. Zitron also criticizes the naming choices, suggesting that a different name might have avoided the legal complications entirely.

Notable Quotes:

"Something about this whole thing feels fishy on both counts."
[09:30] Ed Zitron

"Butt Burger Inc. And it would have been fine. IO would never have sued them if they were called Butt Burger Inc."
[11:00] Ed Zitron

---

6. Implications for the Tech Industry

Zitron concludes by pondering the broader implications of this lawsuit for the tech industry. He suggests that such disputes highlight the intense competition and high stakes involved in AI and tech innovation. The temporary restraining order against OpenAI serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of clear branding and ethical business practices.

Notable Quote:

"This farcical situation will ground OpenAI's hardware efforts to a halt for a little bit..."
[11:45] Ed Zitron

"Until then, I just want to say that everybody in this situation kind of fucking sucks."
[12:00] Ed Zitron

---

Conclusion

In this episode, Ed Zitron offers a critical examination of the legal tussle between IO Products and OpenAI, shedding light on potential ethical breaches and strategic missteps in the tech industry's relentless pursuit of innovation. By dissecting the nuances of the lawsuit, Zitron provides listeners with a deeper understanding of the complexities and challenges faced by tech startups and giants alike.

---

Note: This summary excludes all advertisements, intros, outros, and non-content sections to focus solely on the substantive discussion presented in the monologue.

Transcript

[Ed Zitron]

This is an iHeart podcast.

[Oracle Representative]

In business, they say you can have better, cheaper or faster, but you only get to pick two. What if you could have all three at the same time? That's exactly what Cohere, Thomson Reuters and Specialized Bikes have since they upgraded to the next generation of the cloud. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure OCI is the blazing fast platform for your infrastructure, database, application development and AI needs where you can run any workload in a high availability, consistently high performance environment and spend less than you would with other clouds. How is it faster? OCI's block storage gives you more operations per second cheaper. OCI costs up to 50% less for computing, 70% less for storage and 80% less for networking better. In test after test, OCI customers report lower latency and higher bandwidth versus other clouds. This is the cloud built for AI and all your biggest workloads right now with zero commitment. Try OCI for free. Head to oracle.com strategic that's oracle.com strategic.

[Ed Zitron]

Call Zone Media hello and welcome to this week's Better Offline Monologue. I am, of course Ed zitron. Last week, OpenAI abruptly pulled the promotional materials around, along with any mention of its $6.4 billion all stock acquisition of Joni Ives IO Products, an AI startup that is allegedly making some sort of screenless AI device with OpenAI that will allegedly launch next year. Said device will not be, according to the Wall Street Journal, it won't be a phone, and Ivan Altman's intent is to help wean users some screens. I love my screen. I don't know why people keep thinking that's a bad thing, but it turns out the reason that they did this is that a company called IO sued IO Products, OpenAI, Sam Altman, and I quote Sir Jonathan Paul. I've Jony I've just what a name on June 9, 2025 for trademark infringement, unfair competition and unfair business practices. IO also makes the case that these violations weren't a simply unhappy coincidence, but rather a deliberate action. A judge granted a temporary restraining order on June 20, 2025 that stops IO Products and OpenAI from using its name has obviously put the brakes on Altman's attempt to hype this acquisition, which he had previously leaked to the Wall Street Journal, could add a trillion dollars to the company's valuation, which is of course bullshit. At this point I'm going to start calling IO products, by which I mean OpenAI's soon to be maybe acquired hardware wing the defendants, because IO, by which I mean the startup in question sounds literally the same IO has been referring to a device that they're making as a computer without a screen since, according to an archived version of their website, I found at least April 2, 2025, the defendants argued in their response to IO's complaint that they made changes only after seeing IO products. So Jony Ives thing, or Jony I've fucking don't care. And their thing when it launched, and this was right before they filed the complaint, which is actually true anyway. Who are these people? So IO was founded in March 2018 as part of Google X, which is effectively Google's internal Skunk Works R and D division, and was spun out as an independent company in August 2021, raising a further $37.2 million on top of the $25 million Google had already provided. IO has been preparing for launch ever since. They've had an audiologist approved thing, I think that's come out since. But the io1 device, the thing that's really the thing that we're talking about here, which is an ear worn screen. This computer that's meant to have launched already. TechCrunch said it would launch in winter 2024. In 2024, and of course it hasn't. And the current store page says it will launch in August 2025, but bugger me, I don't know how they would possibly raise money now. There is a company, possibly owned by OpenAI that has the same name that might do the same thing. It's not great. And it doesn't get better for the defendants because I.O. also owns a trademark, one that covers everything from audio headphones, microcomputers, downloadable mobile operating system software, a bunch of other things that would make it very easy to mistake the defendant's announcement. Well, for I.O. and the I.O. one, I mean, they have the same fucking name. They have the same name. They have the same name. Now, one might think this is all a weird coincidence, except it very well might not be. According to IO's complaint, representatives from Sam Altman's Apollo projects, one of his many venture capital firms, met with the company multiple times, receiving technical information and the vision for the product, along with demonstrations of whatever they had at the time. Weirdly enough, in April 2022, IO was also introduced to Jony I've's design firm LoveFrom to talk about a potential partnership, one that LoveFrom eventually declined. Important detail. LoveFrom also works with OpenAI. I don't know if they'd started at that point. In 2022, IO also attempted to hire Evans Hanke as their head of design. Great there. And basically the heir apparent to Jony I've Apple when I've left except Hanke left to join I've on a product that sounds the same. I just fucking hate these people. Hanke declined and in their defendant's reply framed the conversation as Hanke taking a favor for a friend just talking to someone. Nevertheless, Hankey went on to co found the defendants version of IO products in 2023. Also a lot of the defendants arguments are yeah, I was just being nice. I was just meeting with them because. Because they were nice. Because Altman himself said on Twitter, oh, I meet with founders all the time. Do you? Do they have the same fucking name as the companies you're buying? Jesus Christ. In 2025, IO chose to reach out to Sam Altman to invest and got the response that Altman was, and I quote, working on something competitive and that he would, and I quote again respectfully pass before adding that the company was called IO Products and that Jony I've was driving this, which is also a quote. Otherwise multiple people that work for the defendant's identically named company went on to try IO's current product as well as receive demonstrations of the upcoming iO1 device, a screenless computer that you control with your voice. IO also claims that there were multiple meetings with OpenAI representatives and Altman himself about an acquisition, though emails that Altman has publicly shared make it seem more like a friendly gesture this time. And I would buy that to an extent. On the announcement of the deal to acquire I've's company in May, IO CEO Jason Rigolo reached out to Altman again to see about partnering or maybe an acquisition, eventually bringing up that there was an obvious similarity between the names. He used the words rut row, which if I was in a high stakes corporate negotiation, I would not speak like Scooby Doo. Now the defendants frame Rigolo and I.O. as meetings as a generosity on their part. And their generosity was so profound that they chose to meet with IO at least five times over the course of three years. For whatever reason, both Altman and Rigulo are choosing to post about this publicly and both of them seem like huge assholes. Rugalo also posted I I have not, nor have I ever been suicidal on Twitter. And I must add, I'm not a lawyer, but some legal advice, don't post that or anything. Don't ever. If you're in a lawsuit, don't go fucking posting about the lawsuit. I don't care if you're some guy or you're Sam Altman, you shouldn't be doing that. It's just very frustrating to watch. I was talking to a friend of the show, Casey Kagara, about this, and I think it gave him madness, which is good because I like to share it with people. Nevertheless, the judge ordered that the defendants cease using the name IO Products until a hearing is held in October. And in general, judges are hesitant to make this kind of ruling without sincere belief that the case has merit. But in summary, this suit alleges that representatives of Sam Altman, Jony I've and their respective firms, IO Products Love from Apollo Projects and OpenAI, repeatedly met with IO as in Jason Rigolo's company company as a means of learning more about the intellectual property and design of its products, going as far as to suggest that they may partner with, invest in, or consider acquiring the company. I keep thinking of like a Jason Derulo bit with Ragulo, but I don't know how to say his name proper at this point. I'm several minutes into recording the monologue. Someone else do the funny. But to me, something about this whole thing feels fishy on both counts. The defendant's argument is that these meetings were harmless. Framing Rugulo and Iowa's desperate counterparties with the device stuck in development hell, begging OpenAI and Sam Altman to invest in or acquire them, which is compelling. Ish. The emails that Sam Altman shared publicly, and I'll have these in the notes, they don't make Mr. Jason look particularly good. They make him look a little desperate. But at the same time, and I know this from talking to various founders about, like, money is, you generally don't go in hot, and the bigger they are, they get kind of glad. Handle them a little bit because you don't want to piss them off. It's basic business, so he could have just been being nice. I would actually buy this. I would also buy the defendant's argument and think it would have a lot more weight if it wasn't for the fact that they'd met with IO so many fucking times and their goddamn name is identical. In fact, what makes this entire thing so ridiculous is that Altman and I've could have named their startup literally anything else and none of this would have happened. They could have named it Butt Burger Inc. And it would have been fine. IO would never have sued them if they were called Butt Burger Inc. I don't know what they're doing, but I guess the creator of the world's biggest plagiarism machine couldn't fucking help himself while the emails that Altman has shared publicly do make Rigolo sound a bit cloying and don't feel like things you'd send somebody you have a deep relationship with. Like, they feel like new conversations are very generic. IO claims that there have been multiple other calls and emails, and I imagine those will come out in discovery, which is the part of the lawsuit where everybody has to share emails and communications. Yet for me, the most damning part is the involvement of Jony I's love from in 2022. Altman's absolutely a gadfly, and I would buy the idea that he'd meet with random people doing an AI startup. There is a history there of him randomly responding to people, meeting up with them. Sure, whatever. But why was Jony Ives designed for meeting with IO in 2022, a year before he'd found a company with the same name that does something really similar sounding in roughly the same time frame that Sam Altman was meeting with them? I mean, Sam Altman's representatives. Isn't that kind of weird? I mean, it is. It's extremely weird. Why? You were just this friendly. You just love hanging out. This Jason guy doesn't seem like he's doing well. Is he really charming? Is he fun to hang out with? Jason, hit me up, baby. Let's hang. Actually, don't do that. You're in a really big lawsuit. I don't want to fucking talk to you. Stop posting. In any case, this farcical situation will ground OpenAI's hardware efforts to a halt for a little bit, at least until. At least for a month. But they could just rebrand it to, like, I don't know, Butt Burger, Inc. Maybe, but just throwing that out there. Call me Sam. And if you use that name, I'm suing you, too. And while they could come up with a new name such as Butt Burger, any details of the product that leak or announce will now face unbelievable scrutiny, if not by the tech press, but by me and IO's lawyers. Because that's the thing. They chose this name. And changing the name will not hide the fact that they knew some stuff about iOS products. And, I mean, the plaintiff in this lawsuit, that's the other thing. The name is so similar, man. You couldn't have come up with anything. And they're claiming, by the way, oh, IO refers to input output, which is true. But fuck, mate, could you not have come up with anything else? Any other name? Butt Burger. I don't know. I'm gonna say that at least one more time before the End of the episode butt burger. There you go. Anyway, this whole thing is fucking stupid. I find both sides of the situation very annoying and it's also important to note that OpenAI has yet to buy IO products. You know the jony I've startup and is currently in the process of trying to convince Microsoft to let them become a for profit company, which I will get to probably in next week's monologue. Until then, I just want to say that everybody in this situation kind of fucking sucks.

[Annabe Advertiser]

This July 4th celebrate freedom from spills, stains and overpriced furniture with Annabe, the only machine washable sofa inside and out where designer quality meets budget friendly pricing. Sofas start at just $699, making it the perfect time to upgrade your space. Annabe's pet friendly, Stain resistant and interchangeable slipcovers are made with high performance fabric that's built for real life. You'll love the cloud like comfort of hypoallergenic high resilience foam that never needs fluffing and a durable steel frame that stands the test of time. With modular pieces you can rearrange anytime. It's a sofa that adapts to your Life. Now through July 4th, get up to 60% off [e-mail] Every order comes with a 30 day satisfaction guarantee. If you're not in love, send it back for a full refund. No return shipping, no restocking fees. Every penny back. Declare independence from dirty outdated furniture. Shop [e-mail] Offers are subject to change and certain restrictions may apply.

[Ed Zitron]

It's Megan.

[Megan]

Are you ready for hashtag Megan Summer.

[Ed Zitron]

Megan Megan, Megan, Megan, Megan.

[Megan]

Would you prefer that I give you a printout that you can read at your own pace? Megan, yes, it's me, What a shock. Etc.

[Ed Zitron]

On June 27, she is a smoking hot warrior princess.

[Megan]

Alright meat sacks, let's get to work. Are you going to stand in my way?

[Ed Zitron]

The bee is back.

[Megan]

You think you learned your lesson the first time?

[Ed Zitron]

Megan M3 Gan 2.0 only in theaters.

[Megan]

June 27th with Apt 13 this prime day July 8th through the 11th, you can get a great deal on a new foot spa, transforming you into the queen of kickin it.

[Annabe Advertiser]

Wait, this has bubble jets.

[Megan]

Hmm.

Okay, Shop great deals this Prime Day.

[Greenlight Advertiser]

7.8.11 did you know that parents rank financial literacy as the number one most difficult life skill to teach? Meet Greenlight, the debit card and money app for families. With Greenlight, you can send money to kids quickly, set up chores, automate allowance and keep an eye on what your kids are spending. With real time notifications, kids learn to earn, save and spend wisely. And parents can rest easy knowing their kids are learning about money with guardrails in place. Try Greenlight Risk free [e-mail] iheart this.

[Ed Zitron]

Is an iheart podcast.