Loading summary
Transcript133 lines
- [00:00]
Advertisement Voice
This is an iHeart podcast.
- [00:02]
Ed Zitron
Guaranteed Human Amazon Health AI presents painful
- [00:08]
Advertisement Voice
thoughts why did I search the Internet for answers to my cold sore problem? Now I'm stuck down a rabbit hole filled with images of alarmingly graphic sores
- [00:19]
in various stages of ooze.
- [00:22]
I can clear my search history, but I can never unsee that.
- [00:27]
Ed Zitron
Don't go down the rabbit hole. Amazon Health AI gets you the right care fast. Healthcare just got less painful.
- [00:35]
Advertisement Voice
Aging is real and so are the benefits of new vital proteins. Collagen Sparkling water. Because around the age of 30, your body needs backup to keep your collagen up. So get your daily glow up now in three fresh flavors. Strawberry blossom, lemon, lime and blood orange. Improved skin health in as little as 30 days thanks to Collagen peptides. Cheers to that. So you can stay vital. Stay you. Visit vitalproteins.com to learn more and where to buy these statements have not evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
- [01:05]
Every sale comes down to that single second between Buy now and maybe later. PayPal is built to help your business win that moment across new markets and a new agentic era. With a checkout that's reliable and a global network of hundreds of millions of buyers who already know us all to keep you in control, however buying happens next. We're built for payments, Built for growth. Built for agentic. PayPal open. Built for all business. Get started at paypalopen.com Want to know
- [01:35]
you're on the best path to the right car? Start at CarMax where every car is CarMax certified and backed by a 10 day money back guarantee at a price that's upfront from the start. Visit CarMax.com for details. Want to drive?
- [01:49]
Ed Zitron
CarMax Call Zone Media Greetums and salutations. It's me, Ed Zitron and it's better offline, Better offline. That's right. We are back with Prof. G Markets, Ed Elson and we're here to talk about the naughty little buggers in the Magnificent Seven. Primarily the big four, but really the big three, the Amazons, the Googles, and the Microsofts of the world. Ed, thank you for joining me again.
- [02:27]
Prof. G Markets
Thank you so much for having me. I'm very, very excited to be here.
- [02:30]
Ed Zitron
Yeah, so tell me, they just reported earnings and as you well know from the conversation we just had, I got some points to make about it, but why don't you run me through how they did on their earnings?
- [02:42]
Prof. G Markets
Absolutely. So let's just run through what we learned on Microsoft, Microsoft's end, we saw pretty good growth. $90 billion in revenue, up 18%. Amazon, similar story. $200 billion in revenue, up 20%. Meta's revenue increased 28%. I mean, on its surface, this was pretty good. Just look at the numbers, even the net income, which exploded for many of these companies. But of course, that's not really what matters here. What really matters is how is the AI trade actually working out? There are two main questions that we really want to understand when we look at these big tech companies. The first question is, how much revenue did you generate from your AI business specifically? That's what we really want to know the answer to. And then the second question is, how much of that revenue came from two relatively unstable companies financially, specifically OpenAI and Anthropic. Those are the two questions I want to know the answer to. I know you want to know the answer to. We didn't get those answers. They didn't really tell us. And what they did tell us was not very helpful kind of papering over the reality, which makes you think maybe the reality is something that they don't really want us to see.
- [04:02]
Ed Zitron
So that's the funny thing as well. Like, before we get to the meat of what you and I both know, we're going to discuss, there was also these weird massive equity gains. So the net income part of earnings is now not super useful because in all three cases of Amazon, Google and Microsoft, they all posted massive equity returns based on the increasing value of OpenAI and their shares of either or both OpenAI and anthropic.
- [04:29]
Prof. G Markets
Right? Yes. Yeah, a wrinkle in there that I'll address, but we'll start with Amazon and Google. The answer to that question is yes. Amazon's net income. So their earnings exploded 245%. That's crazy growth. More than tripled. Google's exploded 298%. Again, crazy growth. How did that happen? What's going so. Right. What could possibly dig into it? Exactly. The answer in Amazon's case is that 85% of their net income came from unrealized gains in their stakes in Anthropic and OpenAI. So essentially they basically looked at that company. They said, okay, I guess it's worth this amount of money. I guess it's worth a trillion dollars. And they marked that up. And then that was reflected in their earnings. And then Google's case, 87% of their earnings came from their unrealized gains in their stakes in Anthropic and SpaceX. So those earnings of those companies you can't really take seriously because they're not reflecting the fundamental underlying health of the business. They're reflecting the optimism associated with the valuations of these AI startups and these Frontiers labs. So that's the first problem, is the earnings themselves are not really reliable. In Amazon and Google's case, we'll get to Microsoft in a second. The other problem is that that then funnels down into how we value companies. Specifically, one of the most important valuation metrics in investing is the price to earnings multiple. That is how we figure out how expensive or cheap a company really is. We look at their earnings and we look at the price of the stock and we compare if the two match up. Now, as of the end of last week, which is when I did this analysis, Amazon was trading at 19 times earnings. Google was trading at 17 times earnings. The S and P, the overall market currently trades at around 25 times earnings. So if you were to look at those multiples on Amazon and Google, you'd say, oh my gosh, these companies are crazy cheap. It is time to buy. But of course we know that actually, no, those multiples have been massively skewed and compromised, again, by those unrealized gains, by those paper gains.
- [06:42]
Ed Zitron
And just to be clear, like that comparison is always based on net income.
- [06:47]
Prof. G Markets
Yes, it's based on net income is equivalent to earnings. So we look at their PE multiple and they're way down. I mean, you look at last year, Amazon was trading throughout the year at around 32 times earnings. Google was trading around 31 times earnings. So you look at 19 and 17, you go, oh my gosh, what's happened? They're cheap. They're really cheap right now. That's not the case. So what we have to do if you want to actually get an understanding of how to value these companies, is, is you need to subtract out the gains that they have registered in OpenAI and Anthropic and SpaceX. You need to create basically a new metric. And we did that and we found that the true multiple for Amazon when you adjust for that, is actually 30 times earnings, and for Google it's 31 times earnings. So no, these stocks are not cheap right now. Now a lot of people will say, well, are you factoring in the fact that maybe there is some value in those companies? And did you put that in the numerator, blah, blah, blah. There are a lot of, you know, nitty gritty things that we need to do. And the answer is, no, we didn't. But that's the kind of analysis that Wall street needs to be employing right now. And the trouble is, the more that we see these stakes in these little AI startups and these businesses, and the more that it starts to skew the actual earnings of the companies, it makes it a lot more difficult for us to actually value which companies are cheap, which companies are expensive. And of course, it is in that complexification and in that obscurity that bubbles arise. This is the problem that we saw in the financial crisis. It's the problem that you and I have addressed when it comes to the data center SPVs. It's not necessarily that the SPVs are illegal. The problem is that they are hard to track. They're opaque. They're not reflected on the balance sheets of these companies. Which means that Wall street and the underwriters and the investors, when they look at the data, they're not looking at data that really tells them the reality of what is going on. So that is the problem with the earnings. That's the problem with the PE multiple. I will pause there and we will get to Microsoft, which actually didn't have to report an increase in their earnings due to their stake in Open Air.
- [08:56]
Ed Zitron
I thought that they had an anthropic bit that did that, a $3.2 billion gain there.
- [09:00]
Prof. G Markets
Sorry, yes, they did do anthropic, but when you look at. I mean, anthropic is a smaller investment for Microsoft. Their big investment is, of course, OpenAI, which did not show up in their net income. Their net income rose by about 30%. If we were to look at the OpenAI stake, you would think that it would explode by around 300%. Like Google's earnings exploded. That didn't happen due to an interesting GAAP accounting principle, which I can get into in a moment if you'd like me to do it now. Why not?
- [09:33]
Ed Zitron
Go on. Why not go into it?
- [09:35]
Prof. G Markets
All right, so why didn't Microsoft's net income explode? Why wasn't their stake in OpenAI reflected in their earnings? And the answer is that their investment in OpenAI is so significant that because of stupid accounting laws and GAP principles, they are required to report that stake differently. So instead of reporting the alleged value of OpenAI in their earnings, instead, what they have to do, because their stake is so large, and so I guess the law says you need to report this differently. Instead, what they have to do is they have to report their share in OpenAI's profits. But of course, OpenAI has no profits, so that's actually why Microsoft had to take a $600 million hit on their earnings to reflect their share of OpenAI's losses in the second quarter. So in a funny way, when accounting laws require you to report your AI investments correctly, it actually reveals that these big tech companies are actually losing money from AI. But when the accounting laws are loose and they're flimsy, it allows them to say, oh, I made money on this stuff. So it's an interesting wrinkle there. And yes, their anthropic stake, they were able to kind of BS that in their earnings, but they weren't able to do it with OpenAI, which is why they took that $600 million hit. If we just play this out over the next quarter and the following quarter, we. What we can start to see is that actually these investments are not as sexy as the net incomes on Amazon and Google would make them seem.
- [11:13]
Ed Zitron
And the other thing with Microsoft that I found interesting, and I'm a curious little critter, so I went and looked. They mentioned they had annualized run rate for AI in Q3 fiscal 26, which was last quarter, just for the listeners, their fiscal year begins on July 1st of the year beforehand. So their fiscal year 26 begun July 1st, 2025. It's annoying, but their last quarter, they said, oh, we're here. 37 billion run rate for AI. And in this quarter they didn't. Right, they just didn't mention it. And I think what it is is the. I don't know, Ben, Ben from the Ben and Emil show once said this to me. It's like the way to understand the stock market is imagine the thing that would piss you off the most. Happening. So there you go. Because it's so frustrating seeing everyone saying the AI bet paid off. The AI bet paid off. Look, number go up so big. Even though they gave us less information this time, they are obfuscating the information.
- [12:13]
Prof. G Markets
Yes, exactly. If AI were going as well as a lot of people say it's going, then you would expect these companies to simply report their AI revenues and brag about it. But instead they don't do that. Instead what they do is, is they. They report their compute revenue, which to be fair, is growing. But that was a business's business that existed long before AI. That's not their AI revenue. And when they do report their AI revenues, they usually report it in ARR, their annual revenue run rate.
- [12:42]
Ed Zitron
And Amazon actually did that in this quarter and said it had a $25 billion run rate, which is $2.08 billion. But here's the other thing that people seem to miss as well. You know what also happened in this quarter? Anthropic's compute spend accelerated because its revenue, its revenue accelerated. Like it's a very obvious like between. So this quarter would refer to what it's June, May, April. Right? Yeah, that is, that's when Anthropic, I think, claim they hit 30 billion annualized run rate. Like they are spending so much more in compute than their actual revenue. I wouldn't be surprised. And this will get into if most of this run rate came from Anthropic and OpenAI spend again. Jingle, jingle. The keys are here. Look at the run rate. Look at it.
- [13:31]
Prof. G Markets
And I think just, just for, just for your audience to understand why run rate is a bullshit metric. I mean, this is sort of like, this is the classic metric that is reported by startups where their, their revenue is very choppy. And so what they'll do is they'll pick their best month and then they'll just times it by 12 and say this is how much we are expected to make over the course of the year. I'll just like point out with my business, you know, my podcast generated double the revenue in June that it generated in May. We had a really good June. Now I could just annualize that number. I could just times it by 12 and say, oh, that's how much money we're going to make this year. But of course that would be BS And I'm not going to do that to you. I'm not going to lie to you. But this is what they are resorting to instead of just reporting how much money they actually made off of AI Instead, what they do is they pick a random month and then they say, oh, if we times it by 12, then that will be a good number. And that's what they are starting to report. It's very.
- [14:29]
Ed Zitron
But that was.
- [14:30]
Prof. G Markets
Yes, it is.
- [14:31]
Ed Zitron
And that's the one that Microsoft declined to report this month, which means likely that. So the thing is, I'm guessing that they're referring to a month within the quarter, but we actually don't know. We don't know if it's 30 days, 28 days. We don't know if it's four weeks times 50. We truly don't know what would be like four weeks times 13. It's just they never disclose this, but I think it's just a failure of the media and analysts on this one because I feel like if these companies felt any pressure to actually be honest with their investors, they. I don't know would do anything other than this.
- [15:08]
Prof. G Markets
Yes. Well, I think it's actually interesting. Meta is an interesting example of this. Meta is one of the few companies where the analysts are actually trying to ask management the tough questions because it is so obvious what the problem is. The problem is that their free cash flow is declining. It's down 91%. And the reason that it's declining is because they're spending just gargantuan amounts of money on this AI infrastructure. Now, for the other companies who are doing that, they already have these cloud businesses like Google Cloud, like aws, like Microsoft Azure. And so Wall street kind of understands generally how they are expected to generate a return on building all of those data centers. Wall street can stomach that. With Meta, it hasn't been outlined whatsoever. You and I talked about this. They later kind of folded and admitted that they were just going to build their own cloud business. That was what we thought was going to happen. But when the analysts asked Mark Zuckerberg point blank what the actual plan was in terms of roi, how are you actually going to generate a return on all of this AI data center spending? He didn't give them an answer. He didn't discuss the cloud plans. He didn't address any of the reports about how Meta was in early talks to sell Compute to Anthropic, which I know you have covered at length. He basically just avoided the question. And I think that tells you something about Mark Zuckerberg and the extent to which he gives a shit. He doesn't really. He doesn't.
- [16:40]
Ed Zitron
Fired. He literally cannot be fired.
- [16:43]
Prof. G Markets
That's right. Which is back to the governance. Exactly.
- [16:46]
Ed Zitron
I mean, it feels like we're in the golden age of grift. Like it feels like we're just in an era where the only reason this is happening is because they know they can get away with it. There's no. It's not like I've read multiple, I would say like five different articles on Meta, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, their earnings. And the only reason anyone is slightly critical of Meta is because their revenue growth wasn't as good as it was expected to be. That's the only reason. It's not like analysts are point blank saying, hey, you haven't told us what your AI strategy is you may have wasted. They're not being blunt with them. They're just like, hey, hey, Mark, when you get around to it, would you mind telling me why you spent like 200, $300 billion and you want to spend $145 billion this year when you Got a minute? Don't worry, I know you're busy.
- [17:42]
Prof. G Markets
I actually disagree with you on that. I met it is pushing them. I think that this has been recognized by the market, by Wall Street. Took them a while, I'll give you that. But I think that in the case of Meta, they actually are starting to ask those questions. And I think the problem is that the other companies, because they have those cloud businesses, they're kind of refusing to ask the tough question, or not even the tough question. The obvious question of to what extent are you dependent on OpenAI and Anthropic, two companies which are losing gargantuan amounts of money, two of the most unprofitable companies in the history of companies. And that's literally a fact. You can look up the list of the most unprofitable companies ever and you'll notice if you do the math, OpenAI and Anthropic should be in that list. So I think that they are not doing that homework, that hard work of digging into the numbers and asking that difficult question when it comes to especially when it comes to Google and especially when it comes to Amazon. But I do think that they are worried about Meta's total lack of interest in laying out how they plan to generate any returns on this whatsoever.
- [19:00]
Ed Zitron
Amazon Health AI presents Painful thoughts I
- [19:06]
Advertisement Voice
I can't stop scratching my downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist I'm here to talk about my downtown. Some things you'd rather type then say out loud.
- [19:20]
Ed Zitron
There's no question too embarrassing for Amazon Health AI. Chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24. 7 Healthcare just got less painful.
- [19:30]
Advertisement Voice
Aging is real. And so are the benefits of new vital proteins. Collagen, sparkling water. Because around the age of 30, your body needs backup to keep your collagen up. So get your daily glow up now. In three fresh flavors. Strawberry blossom, lemon, lime and blood orange. Improved skin health in as little as 30 days thanks to collagen peptides. Cheers to that. So you can stay vital. Stay you visit vitalproteins.com to learn more and where to buy. These statements are not evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
- [20:01]
Innovation is what gets your business to market and Wasabi is designed to give every business a shot at competition. How break free from skyrocketing storage costs and unpredictable egress fees from old and top heavy legacy providers. You know the big guys. Wasabi is the world's hottest cloud storage company. And the go to provider for professional and collegiate sports teams and leagues around the world. And here's why. Innovation. From Wasabi's AI enabled intelligent media storage Wasabi Air to the industry's only cloud storage service with triple protection against cybercriminals, data deletion and ransomware. The world's top companies trust was Wasabi. Remember Wasabi is up to 80% less than market competition and doesn't charge a cent for businesses to access their own data. Wasabi another championship story. Check them out for free@wasabi.com Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage proud partner of Iheart Podcast Network.
- [21:07]
Every sale comes down to a single second. The one between buy now and maybe later. PayPal is built to help your business win that moment with a checkout experience that feels certain, reliable and familiar. With a global two sided network and hundreds of millions of buyers who already know us all to keep you in control. However buying happens next. New markets, new AI powered sales,
- [21:37]
a
- [21:38]
whole new agentic era where you decide how your business will show up and stand up. PayPal is built to help your business come out ahead. We're built for payments, built for growth, built for Agentic. PayPal open, built for all business. Visit PayPalOpen.com to get started. That's PayPalOpen.com.
- [22:05]
Ed Zitron
Well that's the thing though, I will push back again on meta. Sure they are asking the questions. Yeah, but they're not point blank saying hey, you've not shown it. They're not. And even the media, the media is absolutely not like they're saying, oh, there's concerns over AI spend being higher than usual. That's strange. It's this kind of like plodding, oh I guess maybe we should find something out. And the analysts are pushing these questions now but as we speak and in two days this will come out. So he knows it'll be down again. But met has already recovered 6% today it recovered a couple percent. It's already on course to recover all of the losses. Yeah, so it's not like anything changed. But as we discussed before we got on here, there are some analysts who have tried to work out or have estimated the actual concentration of revenue for Amazon, Google and Microsoft for OpenAI and anthropic spend. And as we were just discussing so Ross Sandler over at Barclays, he estimates that 73% of all Amazon's AI revenues in both 2026 and 2027 will be anthropic. And OpenAI's computer spend just completely anomaly number. Insane. It is insane. So I found this a couple days ago. I'd been working on it and I thought, well, it can't be that bad elsewhere. Except I looked at ubs. Stephen Jews, he said this back in. So Barclays is back in, in March. Stevens was in June. And he said that 40. Sorry, it's 27% of all Google Cloud revenues, so not AI revenues. All Google Cloud revenues for 2026 are estimated to be OpenAI and anthropic and then 44% in 2027. That is completely fucking insane. Like, that is just. This is, this is to me such a huge scandal. And I mean, I can also mention that, well, that there's also a Wells Fargo report that says that Microsoft, same deal, 73% is anthropic and OpenAI of their AI revenues. Michael Turin over there. And it's like, I feel like I'm going a little insane because when you read these numbers, you're like, oh, these are from major investment analysts. How are they not calling like, hey, Mr. Fargo, Mr. Fargo, I read these numbers and you should really check these out because we might be in trouble. And I think, and friend of the showcase, Kagawa really helped me nail this down. I think it's these people are only capable of thinking 2/4 in the future. Like they can. They can think of 2028, they could think of 2027, but they can only do so in terms of the last two quarters. Number has gone up. OpenAI and Anthropic are still solvent, so number will keep going up. It isn't a problem that the revenue is centralized because number keep going up. But to me, this is potentially one of the largest corporate scandals in tech history. Maybe I'm being dramatic, but we're talking over $990 billion of CapEx now, and most of it is for these two companies that can quite literally not afford to pay unless one of those three companies gives them the money.
- [25:20]
Prof. G Markets
Yes, this is a huge, huge problem. And you were saying that the analysts weren't and the media weren't doing their job in terms of asking meta questions about how they're going to generate a return. I sort of pushed back on you on this one. The silence is deafening from the analysts and from the media. There is a very, very obvious concern when it comes to the businesses of the largest and most systemic companies in the world. The companies on which the portfolios of every American are entirely predicated on, on which the entire stock market relies on, and that is how much of your business depends on two companies, OpenAI and Anthropic. And you are one of the few people who has been doing significant work into uncovering that an and you have looked into some of the research that has come out of Wells Fargo, Barclays, ubs, and we should give those analysts credit for crunching those numbers and doing the hard work of figuring it out. But the numbers are insane. OpenAI and anthropic, 74% of Microsoft's AI revenue that is very, very unsustainable. We talk about diversification in markets, the importance of having a diversified portfolio. The same thing goes for business. You want to have a diversified revenue streams that indicates strong, healthy, sustainable growth. None of these big tech companies have anything close to diversified revenue streams when it comes to AI. And so you have to ask the very obvious question, what would happen if One of those two companies, OpenAI and Anthropic, went under? And you also have to ask the question, what is the likelihood that One of those two companies, OpenAI and Anthropic, could go under? What is the likelihood that they would not be able to make good on those payments that are propping up the growth of these big tech companies, specifically when it comes to their revenue? And the answer is it's actually pretty fucking high. Yeah, because you look at the financials and they are ugly, as you have talked about at length and we can get into. But I want to pass it back to you now.
- [27:31]
Ed Zitron
The thing is a fun story. A couple of days ago, Amazon, they were meant to give OpenAI another $35 billion if they went public or reached AGI. Well, none of those, none of those things. None of those things happened, of course, but they still gave them the $35 billion a couple of days ago. And that. And that's crazy. That's a really crazy number, especially because that is. Well, let's just go and have a look at these numbers from Ross Sandler at Barclays. That is so $35 billion is roughly. Oh, let's see. Yeah, it's a little bit. It's around how much AI revenue Amazon has made this year. So 14.1 0.9 8.5 actually. Yeah, yeah, it's $3.4 billion less, sorry, more than Amazon is estimated to make on AI this year in totality, including OpenAI and anthropic spend. So that's good. Just handing themselves money, just handing it to OpenAI and Anthropic so they could hand it back. They already gave $5 billion to Anthropic. They already are on course to give them another 20 billion sometimes this year. Google already gave $10 billion to Anthropic this year has another 30 billion they owe. This is not a real, this is not a real economy.
- [28:51]
Prof. G Markets
This is real growth.
- [28:52]
Ed Zitron
No one's actually doing business here. It's just people handing money to each other and being like, yep, look how profitable we are. Even though that does not even doesn't seem like it's exploding margins either. It doesn't seem like it's having much of an effect at all. But what's really concerning is everyone's excited about these companies because of their cloud growth and it's really beginning to look like most of that revenue growth is coming from this spend.
- [29:20]
Prof. G Markets
Yes.
- [29:21]
Ed Zitron
Which is terrifying.
- [29:23]
Prof. G Markets
It's almost all of it is coming from those two companies. Earlier you said that them not reporting that their revenue is coming from OpenAI and anthropic alone, that that is something of a scandal. I think that is just irresponsible. I think of it less of a scandal. The part that I do think is a scandal is the circular financing aspect of it. It's the fact that those two companies are also the two companies in which Big Tech invested billions and billions of dollars in order afloat. And that is the only reason why those companies are surviving. Yes, it's Silicon Valley and venture investors, but a lot of that investment is corporate investment coming from Big Tech. It's coming from Microsoft, it's coming from Google, it's coming from Amazon. And so the idea that the largest customers, the customers that are driving the majority of these companies revenue growth are also the companies in which those companies had invested in, that is a very, very obvious conflict of interest. At which point it starts to get into actual scandal territory. I don't think that calling the circular financing epidemic, I don't think calling that a scandal is overkill. I don't think that's a stretch too far. I think it really is a scandal and I think it's actually shameful. The way Jensen Huang has talked about it where he was asked this question about the circular deal making and he said, I don't think it's circular at all. He simply denied it. And he didn't come up with an explanation as to why it wasn't circular. He didn't come up with any real excuses. He just said, no, that's wrong bs, I don't like what you're saying. And then he just moved on. And that is a real problem. That's when you start to see that actually these executives, either they're just blindly ignoring what is happening or they are actually lying. I mean, I think that it's reasonable to assume that Jensen Huang told a lie when he said that he didn't think that what they were doing was circular. Just to go back to the question of would OpenAI go under? Because that's the real. That's how this goes down.
- [31:29]
Ed Zitron
Yes. And that is also a point that people are now readily discussing. It's no longer fringe economic theory from a crazy person called ed. It's now something that people want to discuss and are worried about.
- [31:45]
Prof. G Markets
Yes. I think it's like, yeah, but they
- [31:48]
Ed Zitron
discuss it in this way that is like, I don't know, like, if a neighborhood restaurant shut down, like, it's like, oh, you know, you know, these things happen. Business is tough. I wish I was kidding, but I've tried to talk to reporters about this and try to be like, hey, look, this company is really holding up the earth.
- [32:13]
Advertisement Voice
Yeah.
- [32:13]
Ed Zitron
Like, they. They are quite consequential to the future revenues of multiple companies. And they're like, yeah, but, you know, there's other demand.
- [32:21]
Prof. G Markets
Yeah.
- [32:22]
Ed Zitron
And that's the thing. When the big thing that this piece I'm working on will be out by the time this goes out says is like, yeah, the other problem with 73% or so of AI revenues for Google, Amazon and Microsoft being OpenAI and anthropic is. And just be clear, this progresses over the years of estimates. It's not like they say, okay, demand will even out. That suggests that there isn't demand for AI, just writ large, that there is not demand, at least not at the scale that's been promised and definitely not at the scale that will satiate all of these data centers. It's not possible when you look at these numbers. And this is not me just being like, oh, I worked some stuff out with some articles. These are actual financial analysts.
- [33:10]
Prof. G Markets
Yeah, these are. Yeah.
- [33:13]
Ed Zitron
And it's genuinely terrifying because it's not just how bad it will be. And, yes, we'll get back to OpenAI dying in a second. It's the fact that everyone's kind of just looking at it. Be like, that's all right.
- [33:27]
Prof. G Markets
Yeah. I think it was really the actual philosophy was revealed in your Bloomberg interview. And I don't mean this disrespectfully to the interviewer. I thought it was actually a great interview, and I thought they did a really good job. But I forget her name. But the interviewer said something quite important to you where she said, I just want to make sure you understand. I just want to make sure we're all on the same page here. The people who run these companies are very smart people. And that was the beginning of the question which would go on to say something like, are you really sure about all of this? And I think that is the hesitancy that you're seeing when you talk to media outlets, when you go to the New York Times. And I think that's the hesitancy among all of us, which is that to say that this company might not actually work out, which is not an insane thing to say by any stretch of the imagination when you look at their financials and when you look at their numbers. But to say that it might not work out is to say that the people who are running that company and the people who are investing in that company aren't the smartest people in the world. And today, that is a bold thing to say. It is a bold thing to say that Satya Nadella might not know what he's doing. It's a bold thing to say that Sam Altman might not know what he's doing. It's a bold thing to say that Mark Zuckerberg might not know what he's doing, which is quite crazy to me, considering that just a few years ago, he spent more than $80 billion trying to build the metaverse, which was a total failure, total debt on arrival. He renamed his company to Meta because he thought that this was the future. He was so, so wrong about that. So the idea that these people can't be wrong, or that they can't spend money incorrectly, or that sometimes they might actually not be great capital allocators, that is total lunacy. It is a total fantasy. But for whatever reason, people don't want to believe that. People get uncomfortable when you start to suggest that. And that, I think, is why people get uncomfortable when you say the things that you say, because it suggests maybe these guys don't know what they're doing.
- [35:34]
Ed Zitron
Well, it's that. And also, let's just say this right now, looking at the Barclays numbers in front of me, OpenAI dies tomorrow. That is, let's look at it. 28% of Amazon's AI revenue next year, gone. Goodbye. Just. Just evaporated. And indeed, 27% for the next two years as well. If anthropic and OpenAI, if one of them dies, well, that's like 20%. Let's see, OpenAI's a. Well, it looks like about $12.5 billion of Google's 2027 AI revenue just, like, gone, evaporated. And otherwise, their other AI revenues are pretty flat. It looks like vertex, Vertex kind of increases, but again that's through selling anthropic and OpenAI's models. I don't think people realize that. There's a great chart that's coming in this article as well. How much of Azure's revenue as well is just OpenAI spend and it's. Let's see, let's take a look at this chart of Azure revenue as well. 62%. Let's see. Yeah, it's about 72%. 68 to 72% in fiscal year 2026 and as much as 74% in 2027. If these companies die, they lose most of their AI revenue evaporated and that's not including the amount of money that comes through Azure AI renting out their models. And people are just like, yeah, you know, if that happens there'll be more demand. I have this guy who's a very well meaning guy, he's on Twitter, he's a semiconductor bull, an analyst. He always responds and say, look, all Useful COMPUTE will be bought. All Useful COMPUTE will be bought. It will always be bought. And I'm like, yeah, but if OpenAI dies, it's the largest consumer of AI compute, what happens to that? Well, it'll get bought.
- [37:17]
Prof. G Markets
Yeah.
- [37:18]
Ed Zitron
And it's just insane to me. It is genuinely bonkers to me that no one like I guess, I guess what it is taking a step back is looking at what you said as well is it's. They don't want to follow the argument to the logical endpoint because it's. All of these smart people were stupid.
- [37:37]
Prof. G Markets
That's right.
- [37:38]
Ed Zitron
And also everyone was wrong. Wrong in a way that is going to be very difficult to back out of.
- [37:45]
Prof. G Markets
That's right.
- [37:46]
Ed Zitron
And also they were lied to. Just let's be clear.
- [37:51]
Prof. G Markets
Yeah, that, that's, that's the problem now. So I'm in total agreement with you on all this. I want to take things to their logical conclusion further and I'm going to say some, but I don't know if you're going to be that excited about what I'm going to say.
- [38:05]
Ed Zitron
That's fine.
- [38:06]
Prof. G Markets
Because when I think about this, what would actually happen if AI were to basically just die? If OpenAI actually died and if Anthropic actually died. And I think there's good reason to believe that, which we can get into, we can get into their financials and just rehash them because they are very important, they're systemic to the ecosystem. But I sometimes like to think, okay, what would a world look like where the AI thing just didn't work out? And I have to say a lot of that anxiety actually is priced in right now when it comes to big tech. And I just want to point you to the price to earnings multiples. Can you begin to earn. Yes, the price to earnings multiples of big tech. At the beginning of 2023, I went back and looked at this. This was right before the AI trade took off. If you look at the price to earnings multiples, you look at Microsoft, it was trading at 26 times earnings. Amazon was trading at 80 times earnings. Meta was trading at 30, 31 times earnings. If you look at the PE multiples today, and by the way, I looked at this as of last week, at the end of last week, right after they reported their earnings. So they could have changed by now. I'm sure they have. Microsoft's multiple is lower than it was. It's at 25, not that much lower, but it is lower. Amazon's is significantly lower. And this is the real pe, the one that I adjusted, not factoring in their investment gains on their anthropic and OpenAI stakes. It's trading at 30 times earnings. That's lower. And Meta's is significantly lower. It's trading at 20 times earnings compared to 31 before the AI boom. So I think one thing that we should recognize is that in some places, in some areas of the market, I think there are people on Wall street who are actually quite anxious. I think there are a lot of people on Wall Street, Ed, who are reading your newsletter. I truly believe that. And I think that that perspective, the bearish perspective and the acknowledgment of how this could all implode, I don't think that it is completely driving the market. I think there's more optimism than there is pessimism. But I do think that it is somewhat being reflected. And that is to say, if this all were to blow up, I don't think these stocks wouldn't crash. They would certainly crash. But I do think that it wouldn't be as horrible as it might have been, say, in 2008, when the housing bubble was truly elusive to almost everyone. That is my conjecture and I'm sure you might disagree with me on it. But I do think we should recognize the extent to which there is some anxiety that is beginning to be reflected in some asset prices.
- [40:51]
Advertisement Voice
Foreign.
- [40:57]
Ed Zitron
Amazon health AI presents painful thoughts.
- [41:02]
Advertisement Voice
I. I can't stop scratching my Downtown. Yeah, but I'm not itching to go downtown and tell a receptionist. I'm here to talk about my downtown Some things you'd rather type than say out loud.
- [41:17]
Ed Zitron
There's no question too embarrassing For Amazon Health AI chat your symptoms and get virtual care 24. 7 Healthcare just got less painful.
- [41:27]
Advertisement Voice
Aging is real and so are the benefits of adding Vital Proteins Collagen Peptides to your daily routine. New Vital Proteins Collagen Sparkling water. Your daily gloup now in three fresh flavors, Strawberry blossom, lemon, lime and blood orange. Improved skin health in as little as 30 days thanks to Collagen Peptides. Cheers to that. Or go with our classic Collagen peptides so you can stay vital. Stay you. Visit vitalproteins.com to learn more and where to buy these statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
- [41:58]
Innovation is what gets your business to market and Wasabi is designed to give every business a shot at competition. How Break free from skyrocketing storage costs and unpredictable egress fees from old and top heavy legacy providers. You know the big guys. Wasabi is the world's hottest cloud storage company and the go to provider for professional and collegiate sports teams and leagues around the world. And here's why. Innovation from Wasabi's AI enabled intelligent media storage Wasabi Air to the industry's only cloud storage service with triple protection against cybercriminals, data deletion and ransomware. The world's top companies trust Wasabi. Remember, Wasabi is up to 80% less than market competition and doesn't charge a cent for businesses to access their own data. Wasabi Another championship story. Check them out for free@wasabi.com Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage Proud partner of Iheart Podcast Network.
- [43:04]
Every sale comes down to a single second, the one between buy now and maybe later. PayPal is built to help your business win that moment with a checkout experience that feels certain, reliable and familiar. With a global two sided network and hundreds of millions of buyers who already know us all to keep you in control. However, buying happens next. New markets, new AI powered system. A whole new agentic era where you decide how your business will show up and stand up. PayPal is built to help your business come out ahead. We're built for payments, built for growth, built for Agentic. PayPal open built for all business. Visit PayPalOpen.com to get started. That's PayPalOpen.com.
- [44:03]
Ed Zitron
So one pushback, yeah, and I think it's a critical one, is that even though the price to Earnings and all that reflects a little bit lower and it's showing some anxiety. It still is a price factored into the, which factors in the idea that these companies will keep growing. Yes, and I think that that is a critical problem because I'm not sure, at least in the case of their cloud businesses, whether these companies are growing anymore when remove OpenAI and Anthropic. And I don't think it like, I'm not just talking like I don't think Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta though I think Meta could die in 10 years. I've thought that for a while. I think that they're just, it's falling apart, but I don't think they're dying. I think their stocks are going to get their asses beat. But the problem is going to be not just that AI didn't work, that's what's going to be the first problem. The second one is when they go, right, well, OpenAI isn't paying you anymore and suddenly your, your revenues are down.
- [45:00]
Prof. G Markets
Yes.
- [45:01]
Ed Zitron
And your growth is slowed. Hey, Google Cloud has stopped growing. It stopped growing pretty much at all. It's in fact looks kind of flat. What's the deal with that? And it's because anthropic and OpenAI's compute spend was propping up the growth. So while Wall street might be saying, oh well, if AI doesn't work out, I think what they mean is that they think AI won't work out and be the next big thing, but there will still be big revenue generating businesses from this, which is not the case. I went and looked at the Wells Fargo estimates from Turin and what's interesting for Microsoft is that in fiscal year 2027, so next year they estimate the Microsoft 365 copilot will make $10 billion a year in annual revenue, which is pathetic. That's like a third of intelligent cloud. I mean it's a little bit less than they estimate that Azure AI will make, which is predominantly made up of selling OpenAI's models.
- [46:09]
Prof. G Markets
I mean, they said one of their bragging points on that earnings call was that they have 30 million copilot paying copilot users. But what they don't really talk about is the fact that that's part of a larger enterprise bundle, which only makes up about 8% of their total Microsoft 365 subscribers. So basically what they're telling us, they're trying to brag, but ultimately I read that and I go, oh, so you only converted 8% of your user base. That was the share of Your users who are down to try this AI product that you say is going to change the world. So to that point, I don't think that the strength that they are projecting in their consumer AI business is anywhere near what they'd like us to believe.
- [46:53]
Ed Zitron
Well, on top of that, the Wells Fargo estimates. Estimates, estimates. Someone will get me on that one in the comments. They only estimate that they made 3.85 billion for the entire fiscal year 2026 from 365 copilot. You know the thing with 30 million paid seats, they're discounting this to Timbuktu. Like this is, this is being. They're discounting it to hell. And I mean pretty much anything like, like pretty much anything that Microsoft sells has discounts. Especially when it comes to Microsoft 365. But again, the hogs lapped it up. They love their slop. They love being given a new big number so that they can interpret it when they. Again, not really sure what these analysts were doing because I don't know. Again, I think I've said this already. Like if I was working at Wells Fargo and I had these numbers, I would be calling my boss's boss. I'd be like, hey guys.
- [47:49]
Advertisement Voice
Hi.
- [47:50]
Ed Zitron
We have a problem. Because like I said earlier, it's not just that Microsoft, Google and Amazon have pathetic AI revenues outside of OpenAI and Anthropic. It's that if they have pathetic revenues, if they as the largest holders of AI compute, as with the ones with the best pricing power, with the best teams, ostensibly with the most experience building AI data centers and providing AI compute, if they can barely scrape together what like, let's see, so it's like 73, 74% of their revenues. So they have this meager little shrivel of their AI revenues is from diverse revenue. If that's the case, then there is not demand for AI compute. It's not that there's only a little. It means there's none. It means there's actually like there is a couple billion. Because again, when you look at the other providers, Coreweave, who are their biggest customers? Anthropic, Meta and OpenAI. Who's Ayran's biggest customer? Microsoft. Nebius. Microsoft. What's Microsoft doing with AI? Not very much. Not actually very much at all. They are providing compute to OpenAI and conning people into buying Copilot. Yeah, like it's just, it's astonishing because this is bigger than them. It's bigger than them. It's the 190 gigawatts of planned data center capacity. It's all of these data centers being built everywhere. I, like I'm stuttering because it's like the ramifications of this are everything I've kind of feared, which is that AI demand does not exist at scale and most of these data centers don't go paid for. And that's even if anthropic and OpenAI succeed in surviving past 2027.
- [49:36]
Prof. G Markets
Well, I think you said something important earlier about the growth, and that is if this AI thing doesn't work out, it's not as if Microsoft and Amazon and Google and Meta won't have a business anymore. They had a business before AI and the business was pretty big and doing pretty well. What it does mean is that these companies won't actually be growing anymore. They won't be growth companies. And I think this gets to the heart of what AI has been all about, and that is that the big tech companies, in late 2022, when ChatGPT was released to the world, they suddenly realized, oh my gosh, innovation is happening without us. There are other companies on the scene, there are other technologies, and we don't have a part in it. And so they decided, okay, what are we going to do? We're going to do whatever we can to take whatever semblance of technology exists in that company and then bolt it onto our own companies. We're basically going to inject that optimism into our own faces as if it were Botox, to convince the market that we are in fact young again, that we are growing, that we're hot, that we're innovative, and that you should come and put your money in us. Because we're not just a company that's going to continue to generate cash. We're a company. We're a generational company company. We're a company that's going to significantly increase profits at an exponential rate over 10, 20, 30 years. That is the story that they wanted to tell the markets, and they wanted to tell it so desperately that they were willing to actually go and invest in those companies like OpenAI and Anthropic and also SpaceX, which we haven't mentioned that much, but it actually plays a role in all this.
- [51:24]
Ed Zitron
Yeah.
- [51:25]
Prof. G Markets
And then have those companies come back and then buy our chips, give us back the money, and then we're going to use that and use that as a story to tell the world that actually we're young again, that we are
- [51:37]
Ed Zitron
growing, and convince everyone by proxy to spend money on AI Compute to compete with us, with the companies that we
- [51:46]
Prof. G Markets
invest in, we will obliterate our balance sheets in the process. And that's where things are going to get really ugly. The companies that really start to lose cash and we're starting to see it Amazon negative free cash flow, Google negative free cash flow flow as of this quarter. But that's really what they're doing here. They want to be young again. But if you look at these companies, these companies are old. These are mature companies. Their heyday is behind them. But they don't want to believe that. They want to live forever. They are the Brian Johnsons of the world of technology. And so I think what's going to happen if this thing doesn't work out, and I think there's a high likelihood that it won't because of the financials of OpenAI and Anthropic and how dependent the whole world has become on them. I think what will happen is the companies won't go under, the big tech companies. I think what will happen is Wall street will look at them and they'll say, you're not a growth company, you're a mature company. And that means that we're going to assign a mature multiple to your earnings. We're not going to have the days of. I think that'll look like something in the range of 15 to 20 times earnings. So that's why, by the way, Meta, I'm not so worried about, because Meta is actually in that range. I think if you look at the company, I think Wall street is looking at it and saying, this is a company whose growth prospects are unlikely at best. So I'm not so worried about Meta. The companies I'm more worried about is a company like Google trading above 30 times earnings. By the way, a company that's gotten way out over its skis from a multiple perspect, which is really surprising to me, is Apple. And I think that's because people have actually gotten nervous about the AI trade. And so they said, okay, Amazon still has cash on the balance sheet. Apple is trading at nearly 40 times earnings. The way that they have been able to dupe the market into thinking that they are a growth company when they haven't come out with a new product in 10 years. And the ones that they've tried to come out with and tried to sell have completely flopped. They canceled the Apple car. The Vision Pro was a total disaster. I mean, that's very clearly not a growth company, but I think that's the question.
- [53:56]
Ed Zitron
The funny thing is with Apple as well is that they've managed to keep Going by just not blinking on the AI trade. Except the AI trade fucked them over because of the increasing cost of ram.
- [54:08]
Prof. G Markets
Right.
- [54:08]
Ed Zitron
Because of everyone buying into. I mean, that's the other thing. It's like the increasing. This is the other. So actually this is a good bridge from what you were just saying. The other problem with this as well is. Yeah, you're saying these companies will be assigned growth, like the multiples associated with old, boring companies.
- [54:27]
Prof. G Markets
Right, Boring, old, mature.
- [54:28]
Ed Zitron
But again, I don't think that factors in, A, the fact they're not growing, but B, the fact that they have hundreds of billions of assets now. They just burdened with debt, endless debt. Microsoft has been kind of smart in the amount of debt it's taken on. It's nowhere near as encumbered. But who knows at this point? Google's done a massive equity sale, or they plan to do a massive equity sale.
- [54:53]
Prof. G Markets
The more on tilt they get in order to pursue this Botox future of being young again, this is the more dangerous.
- [55:00]
Ed Zitron
You gotta write that up.
- [55:03]
Prof. G Markets
The more dangerous, the larger the threat to their entire existence becomes. So I will agree with you. If they continue down this road of I'm not just gonna pay for the Botox with the cash that I already have in my bank account. I'm going to take on significant amounts of debt, significant amounts of leverage and margin in order to pursue that Dre dream. Because I'm so obsessed with pursuing it and I need to do it because I have to be young again. If they take that to its end, to its logical conclusion, as you say, then, yeah, we can start talking about will these companies implode? And I think Oracle is an example of a company where they have done that. They have genuinely done that, and its prospects are genuinely terrifying. We're starting to see it with some of these other companies. We're starting to. I was shocked that Google was willing to come out with a quarter of negative free cash flows. I was shocked, shocked that Amazon was willing to do that. So it does appear that they're starting to lose their marbles on this front. They're so obsessed with the mission, they're so obsessed with the AI future that they are actually acting irresponsibly. But I don't think that we're quite there yet. I think the signs show that they're going to continue to do this. I mean, if they continue to load up their balance sheets with debt, who knows what the future will actually look like.
- [56:18]
Ed Zitron
But this is.
- [56:19]
Prof. G Markets
So far, they're not quite in a place where they're fully going to collapse and implode would be my read of the situation at present.
- [56:30]
Ed Zitron
I fully agree. By the way. I don't actually think the big three collapse. I think Meta is already on the down spiral. I think they really, I think their product is collapsing and the things that I continually hear from that company suggest that, like the culture is screwed. But nevertheless, for the short term, at least, next five years, I think that they will be fine. They're not going to have a fun time of it when this ends. Again, when it comes to like logical endpoints and the way that people don't want to discuss them, Oracle is now spending all of its revenue, just more and more than its revenue on AI CapEx just for OpenAI. And I mean, the New York Times just fucking ripped me off. By the way, like there is a sentence in there about fallen angels that is like bordering on identical to my piece. Fucking New York Times, man. If you're listening from the Times, go read the Oracle piece. Go read my fallen angel bit from the OpenAI bubble. You tell me if I'm crazy. But nevertheless, people are having this conversation like, wow, Oracle, they're kind of unprofitable. That's not good. Wow, that's not good. But then they stop short of saying the thing that they don't want to say much like everyone else, they want to talk about this bit, which is, yeah, if Oracle doesn't work out, the AI trade, it dies.
- [57:44]
Prof. G Markets
Yes.
- [57:45]
Ed Zitron
Its revenue has been flat for 15 years, adjusted for inflation. It has. The crazy thing is, I wrote about this a couple of weeks ago. The crazy thing about Oracle is that they actually would be on the decline already, but whenever they slow down, they buy more companies. They just acquire companies. They're like, they're really strange.
- [58:03]
Prof. G Markets
Yeah.
- [58:04]
Ed Zitron
But nevertheless, no one wants to talk about the fact that Oracle will die. And honestly, seeing these numbers. Yeah, Oracle will die.
- [58:12]
Prof. G Markets
It is a genuinely. It is a genuine possibility. It's not. Not overhype, it's not doomerism. It could genuinely happen. I think we should give credit to one group of people who actually do seem to be pricing in that possibility, and that is the credit default swap traders. Oh yeah. Whichever ones have driven those CDSs up to where they are. I don't know where they are.
- [58:36]
Ed Zitron
And that's just for the listeners. That's just betting on whether Oracle will die.
- [58:40]
Prof. G Markets
That's betting on it dying.
- [58:42]
Ed Zitron
Specifically betting on whether it will default on its debts.
- [58:45]
Prof. G Markets
Yes. Whether it's the insurance that you pay on the bond possibility that it will default and the price of that insurance is going up. People are beginning to realize in that market specifically that the possibility is real, that it could actually happen. And I mean, I think there's a question as to again, whether they're too late on that. Weren't the signs there before? Couldn't we have started to see this coming not today, but six to 12 to 18 months ago? And I think that would be the contention of your readers and your listeners who have been hearing about this from you for a very long time. And then suddenly everyone decides, oh, maybe it's a problem. Maybe we'll start to write some articles on this. Maybe we'll start to see those spreads widening on the CDS swaps. But we should give them their props. Some investors seem to be acknowledging the situation.
- [59:42]
Ed Zitron
Yeah, well, you know what, Ed? I think that's actually a good spot to end it. People can find you on Prof. G Markets what you working on at the moment because you should write up that Botox thing. That's an incredible. It's an incredible idea. It's a banger. Please run with it.
- [59:57]
Prof. G Markets
Okay.
- [59:57]
Ed Zitron
What else are you working on?
- [59:58]
Prof. G Markets
That'll be my next newsletter. Let's see. I'm working on a newsletter where we're talking about what happened in South Korea last week that'll go out on Tuesday of this week. So that's tomorrow. I don't know when this episode will come out, but if you want to come follow my work, go to Prof. G markets. We're on YouTube. I cover the markets every single day of the week, or at least Monday through Friday. And we talk about everything. We have people on from all walks of life from different sides of the market. We try to have bulls on, we try to have bears on. And we'll certainly be having Ed Zitrin on in the future as well because we love him and we love his analysis.
- [60:33]
Ed Zitron
We love the eds. All right, you'll find me on the monologue this week as well. Haven't worked out what it's going to be. It'll probably be about this. Thank you, as ever, for listening. Subscribe to the newsletter Premium as well as my main source along with the podcast. I love you all. Thank you for listening. Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song is Matosowski. You can check out more of his music and audio projects@matosowski.com m a t t o s o wski.com you can email me at ezeteroffline.com or visit betteroffline.com to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to Chat where's your ED app to visit the Discord and go to R betteroffline to check out our Reddit. Thank you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production of Cool Zone Media. For more from Cool Zone Media, Visit our website coolzonemedia.com or check us out out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [62:00]
Advertisement Voice
Aging doesn't stop and neither should you with vital proteins, collagen and protein shakes because around the age of 30 your needs more support for movement and recovery on workout and rest days. Reach for a 30 gram total protein shake or go with our classic collagen peptides. Help support healthy hair, skin, nails, bones and joints so you can stay vital. Stay you. Visit vitalproteins.com to learn more and where to buy these statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
- [62:32]
Ed Zitron
Hey everyone, it's Kalpen. I'm inviting you to join the best sounding book club you've ever heard with my podcast Hearsay, The Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club. Every episode I nerd out with amazing guests and dive into the best new audiobooks available on Audible. It's the book club for your ears. Listen to Earsay, the Audible and iHeart Audiobook Club on the iHeartradio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
- [63:01]
Advertisement Voice
Okay, Laundry stinks. Literally. I mean you could just keep buying new underwear. Not that I've ever done that. Or maybe sort your clothes into piles based on how re wearable or filthy they are.
- [63:13]
Or just use Arm and Hammer Deep Clean.
- [63:16]
It's made for real life stinks and stains.
- [63:19]
So even if you don't do laundry,
- [63:21]
the quote right way Deep Clean will knock it out. I mean it is from the number
- [63:26]
one liquid detergent brand that tackles more
- [63:29]
loads than any other.
- [63:30]
Come clean with Arm, Arm and Hammer
- [63:32]
Deep Clean Number one claim based on
- [63:34]
total wash loads sold.
- [63:38]
Ed Zitron
We learned how to love dogs from
- [63:40]
Advertisement Voice
the dogs that loved us and waited
- [63:42]
Ed Zitron
for us to get home from school.
- [63:44]
Advertisement Voice
They were the dogs that raised us. We returned the love with Pedigree Dog Food.
- [63:50]
Ed Zitron
It was good then and it's better now.
- [63:53]
Advertisement Voice
Every bowl has 100% complete nutrition supporting six health essentials and now it includes Vitamin Good Bites, a nutrient boost your dog will love.
- [64:03]
Ed Zitron
Pedigree Good then, better now.
- [64:06]
Advertisement Voice
This is an I heart podcast. Guaranteed human.