Loading summary
A
Hello again my lovely betwixters. It's me. Do you remember earlier this year when we went completely mad and we did a betwixt live show? Well, it went so well that we are now doing it again next year, only we are doing two shows. We have one in Edinburgh on the 23rd of May and one in London town on the 25th of May and tickets are available right now. Just in time for Christmas. Go to Fane f a n e.co.uk and search for betwixt and we will see you there.
B
This holiday season. Reach for the one butter that never disappoints. Kerrygold. Made with milk from grass fed cows on Irish family farms, it's rich, creamy and perfect for baking. Whether browning butter for cookies or crafting the flakiest pie crust, Kerrygold's high butterfat content makes all the difference in flavor and texture. Holiday treats will taste extraordinary.
A
Hello, my lovely betwixters. It's me, Kate Lister. How are you doing? I hope everything has been okay and that the chaos is starting to subside. And in order to get you through the festive period, we are here with another episode of Betwixt the Sheets. But you know what's coming before I can let you enter the hallowed vaults of Betwixt the Sheets. Yeah, it's the fair dues warning. This is an adult podcast spoken by adults to other adults about adulty things in an adulty way covering a range adult subject. And you should be an adult too, right? Now we can crack on.
C
O thou my lovely boy, who in thy power doth hold time's fickle glass, his sickle hour, who hast by waning grown, and therein showest thy lovers withering as thy sweet self growest.
A
You can throw many accusations at us here on Betwixt, but you can't say that we're not fucking highbrow after that. That was an excerpt from Shakespeare's Sonnet 126 and is the case with many of his love sonnets. It was written by a man to another man. You may well raise your eyebrows betwixt us. But what can this tell us about the man who wrote it and his sexuality, his sexual leanings? Can it tell us anything at all? Was he happily married with three kids, living a humdrum life in Stratford upon Avon? Or was he living life on the wild side in London? Today we are slipping between the Shakespearean sheets to find out about the sex life of the Bard himself, William Shakespeare. And we're going to try and answer all of those Questions and more. Hello and welcome back to Betwixt the Sheets, the history of sex scandal in society with me, Kate Lister. I don't usually associate William Shakespeare with being a particularly private man. I mean, he wrote over 150 sonnets about love. The thing is, and it's really weird, we don't really know very much about his love life at all. We don't know much about him really, considering how influential he's been. So ahead of watching Hamnet, we thought that we would take another look at this chat I had with Anna Beer, cultural historian and biographer, about the man himself. What can we find out about Shakespeare's love life from his writing? Anything. Anything at all? What do we know outside of that? Well, let's get our ruffs on and find out. Hello and welcome back to Betwixt the Sheets. It's only Anna Beer. How are you?
C
I'm very happy to be back, thank you.
A
You kidding me? I had so much fun talking to you last time. The last time I spoke to you, I found out that Jane Austen made an anal sex joke. And I don't know how I've lived this long and not known that.
C
I can go lower. I can go lower.
A
Well, we're definitely lower. Lower is good. That's what we're going for. And older, because we're talking about Shakespeare today.
C
Yes, indeed. And you've invited me on to talk about Shakespeare in sex. And I was trying to think, when does he not write about sexual. It just seems, it's everywhere.
A
But you don't learn that at school. That comes to you, like later on, if you go back to university or A level or if you watch a film or something, then you suddenly realize how utterly filthy his plays are. And they glossed over all of that in school. All of that for the betwixt betw and thou. And nowhere did they point out that he's an absolute filth bag.
C
Just last week I was invited to talk to a bunch of primary school kids, year four.
A
Oh, God, Anna, what did you do?
C
Shakespeare. And I just thought, there's absolutely nothing I can say. Nothing, Nothing. Everything and every word I said had a double meaning in my own head. And I had to sort of keep it very.
A
That's amazing.
C
So, yes, primary school Shakespeare.
A
You just sat there just going, shakespeare was a playwright, he wrote plays, he.
C
Made things up, he dressed up and that's it, full stop.
A
Are there any plays where he's not making rude, smutty jokes like the really serious tragedy ones or the Royal History or is it just an absolute smutfest from start to finish.
C
That's a really good question because I was thinking about a word that crops up over and over again, the word nothing. And by the way, the word nothing usually refers to female genitals. Apparently, I've been swatting up on this. It can refer to male genitals as well. But we're just going to stick with female genitals for the moment. And so much ado about nothing. Nothing is. What a fuss are you making about a woman's bit or countless, countless jokes about it. But those jokes are still made in some of the most serious moments of Shakespeare's tragedies, but can't help himself. Having said that, there is a line that Shakespeare doesn't cross. And I'm thinking of King Lear, which is possibly the most traumatic play written in the English language. And Cordelia. Virtuous, perfect. Cordelia says the word nothing to her father, and I refuse. I refuse to see that as smut.
A
Okay, I'm just going to see Shakespeare trying to get a knob joke in at, like, the most serious.
C
Honestly, he does get a knob joke in whenever he can, as it were.
A
I've never heard that nothing was slang for the vulva. And I have heard a lot of vulva slang. That is fascinating is that from this kind of like really weird, ancient, a deeply misogynistic thing, that the vulva wasn't an organ in its own right. It was a lack of a penis.
B
Yeah.
C
Because a is a thing. And so Shakespeare writes an entire sonnet about no thing, nothing and thing. And he knows which one he wants.
A
Yeah, it's this bizarre sort of talking about gentles that the vulva is just an absence of a penis.
C
It's a lack. It's a lack. It's the absence of the thing. And most of the words that are used around female body parts are about lack, about absence, about horror holes, rings, things that suck men in and destroy them.
A
Well, mine does. Anyway. One of the really interesting things I found about Shakespeare, or found out about Shakespeare, is that the way it's spoken on stage, normally or in film stuff, it wouldn't have actually sounded like that at the time. His dialect would have been different. The words would have been pronounced different. And there's a whole movement at the moment, and I forget the name of the professor who does it. And I'm really sorry, but I have read this, I promise. But he is staging plays in the original dialect. And then suddenly the work gets even ruder. Because now when the inflections and stuff. Like when Hamlet says to Ophelia, I think you mean country matters or something. And then like in the original dialect, cunt is really emphasized. So it might even be ruder than we think it is.
C
I am liking that a lot because there's verbs that you read on the page, like not acquainted with. Actually, if you read it, not a cunted with. The speaker is describing a man who does not have a cunt. And that's the whole thrill of this man. He doesn't have a cunt, he has a thing. Are you following this, dear?
A
Listen, just a. Yes.
C
So I love that there's also the whole business about staging, that you can bring the filth alive through staging. But at the same time, this is my historical brain working here. Yes, the language is doing loads of filthy work relentlessly, even in the most inappropriate moments. But we've got to remember that back in Shakespeare's time, it was young boys playing the women's parts. And so there wasn't any physical expression, bodily expression of woman on stage, of femaleness, as it were. So maybe that's why the language has to work so hard to draw attention to create the sexy bits.
A
Well, I often forget that, that the original, it would have been an all male cast. So even when, like Romeo and Juliet are kind of, you know, having their pillow talk first thing in the morning, it would have been two fellas when Othello is strangling Desdemonia. Two fellas. And that must have given Shakespeare a bit of license to play around with other jokes that were going on there.
C
Yeah, they're all the filthy jokes about sex, but there's also the playfulness, actually more joyous playfulness around gender in. In Shakespeare's works, and not just in the comedies, but particularly in the comedies he was writing at the end of the Elizabethan reign, Twelfth Night, things like that. So you've got a boy actor dressing up as a girl to be on stage and then the girl character dressing up as a boy and then possibly going back to being dressed as a girl. I've already lost track. But the point is, gender is completely.
A
Nobody does that a lot. Doesn't he?
C
Yeah.
A
Yes. Because there are loads of plays where girl, girl characters dress up as boys and that. That's like a big joke. But you forget that it' actually a boy in the first place disguised as a girl, who's now pretending to be a boy, marrying somebody else who's. Oh, it's very confusing.
C
It's very confusing. And like all the filthy jokes, a Lot of them I could get quite cross about, actually. Like you were saying about nothing pretty reductive in their view of females bodies. And I could give you hundreds of quotes about really nasty descriptions of heterosexual sex. But as I say, when it comes to gender, how we live as men and women, Shakespeare has fun. A lot of that nastiness really disappears.
A
That makes me laugh because I do remember seeing somebody, some twit on Twitter, of which there are many, trying to make the claim that we should be more like Shakespeare somehow. That you know, great works of literal, very heteronormative. It was just like. You fucking kidding?
C
Yeah, just. No, just absolutely no. I was desperately trying to find moments of, as it were, lovely, conventional, conservative, home, family, man, woman, love moments. And they are very, very few and far between. I was thinking about that. Oh, I have to tell you. I have to tell you, one of the slightly cheeky things I've done is occasionally I get invited into the great schools of England, which tend to be boys schools and tend to be very, very expensive. Anyway, I was invited in to do a session on Hamlet. I'm not going to say which school I. Absolutely not, because they'll probably sue me. And I have this group of teenage boys playing scenes from Hamlet. And one had to be Hamlet and the other one had to be Horatio. And then I did a couple of scenes where Hamlet and Ophelia were talking to each other, or in fact, Hamlet was talking at Ophelia. Hamlet, there's a lot of that. And they experienced it and they were man enough, boy enough to admit it, that the real love shown in that play is between Hamlet and Horatio, between two men.
A
That's interesting.
C
And there's not much love around going on between Hamlet and Ophelia, even though that relationship is very important. So looking for the love in Shakespeare's plays, again and again I come back to close friendships between men.
A
Okay, that is very interesting because that Shakespeare is a difficult character to get hold of because I might be wrong about this. But we don't know much about him, the actual person. And that's why there's all these like conspiracy theories about. Oh, he didn't write any of it. It was all. It was actually Kit Marlow. It was all blah, blah, blah. We don't know very much about the man himself.
C
Yeah, correct.
A
Do you think he might have been gay? That's not a fair question.
C
No, no, no, it's a really, really good point.
A
Should we out him? We're going to out Shakespeare.
C
Well, there's about 400 ways to answer that question. But I want to say two things. Or that grenade you've lobbed into the conversation. I'll start with, we know so little about William Shakespeare's life. There are no letters from him, there are no letters to him. We have a few shreds of documentary evidence that you can put together and work out that he evades his taxes and he makes a will, and we're not even absolutely sure when he was born. But into that vacuum, into that space, into that nothing, we all project what we want Shakespeare to be like. So it's not just about authorship, it's also, do we want him to be a happily married, heterosexual guy who's really in touch with Middle England values and just wants to go home to Stratford? Or do we want to make him a kind of wild, bisexual, crazy actor, lovey in London, escaping domesticity and all those kids. So whichever way you go. And it's the same with saying, what was he in terms of his sexual identity? What we would say sexual identity. And that brings me to my second big point. And I've grappled with this. I have grappled because I had to write a biography of Shakespeare and talk about poison's chalice.
A
But just one line, we know fuck all. Next.
C
Yeah. Yes. Move on, people. But do we read from the plays to the man? Do I look at, say, Hamlet, the character and say Hamlet has got a lot of problems. He's brilliantly written. Of course he's brilliant. It's a work of genius. Such depth, such complexity. But he's pretty focused on the sex life of his mother, who's not that old.
A
That is weird, isn't it?
C
He's really nasty of feeler. He's got lots of theories about how talented, terrible women are. And he's got 101 fears about his own masculinity. He's so terrified that he's not a real man. Now, do I say Hamlet, Interesting character there. That must be Shakespeare. Or if that's true, then is he also Cleopatra? Is he also Coriolanus? Is he also. That's what troubles me about the reading from the plays to the life. But what we can say is, what we came in on is that Shakespeare cannot resist putting filth into his plays. And he's got a fascination with sex and gender that runs like a seam through everything he wrote.
A
I know that it's kind of trendy and interesting, cool to go back and do a queer reading of texts. And believe me, I've done my fair share of It. But there's a lot of it in Shakespeare.
C
There is.
A
There's a lot of it.
C
I was of the generation that perhaps a few of the bawdy jokes were explained to me with diagrams. But queer sex, no, no, no, no. And Shakespeare makes it easy to say no, no, no, because he tends to give us utterly heteronormative endings.
A
Yeah.
C
Male, female couples get together in marriage. It's just that when you actually look at what's come before, I was checking up a few of my queer moments, as it were. And it's not just cross dressing, though, that is glorious and fun and unresolved, which I think is the queerest thing about it. I think if you look at a character like Coriolanus, the play is one of Shakespeare's Roman plays. It's set in Roman times. Remember the Romans and the Greeks had absolutely no problem with male. Male sexual activity. So Shakespeare and all his contemporaries have got this. How do I use stories from that time when this was okay in my time when this is absolutely not okay? And what's interesting is that he does not drop that. He doesn't tone it down. He actually ramps up the homosexual desire and makes it very, very explicit. For example, a character called Orphidius. I could read if you actually want to hear some of sexual fantasies about our hero Coriolanus, who, by the way, is happily married. But that, as we know, doesn't mean a thing. So Coriolanus has quite a few problems with women. He's got the mother from hell. It's one of the most brilliant studies of a very, very nasty older woman. Angers my meat and I sup upon myself. This is a bitter woman. He's got a completely non entity of a wife. These women are just not important to the play. But his real emotional attachment is to the men he goes to battle with. His. His opponents, the men he fights with, he's. He's a soldier through and through. And when they meet, they say, oh, let me clip ye in arms as sound as when I wooed in heart as merry as when our nuptial day was done and tape was burned to bed with. So, man hug. Yeah, this is actually better than my marriage. So that's just act one. Later on, let me twine mine arms about that body where against my grained ash that's a stick. My grained ash broke and scarred the moon with splinters. When they finally meet, this is late on in the play and everything's going wrong except for this bromance, Orphidius. Who's a very macho general, says, I have nightly since dreamt of encounters twixt thyself and me. We have been down together in my sleep, unbuckling helms, fisting each other's throat, and waked half dead with nothing. Now, I've suddenly given our conversation earlier. Is he actually saying, I'm a man having a wet dream about you, Another man. But I wake up next to my wife, who's got this nothing that I'm supposed to use.
A
And there was a fisting reference in.
C
There as well, and a throat reference, which. Yes.
B
Wow.
A
Even like when you have to be careful that you're not reading things from a modern perspective, that still sounds quite gay to me.
C
Yes. You'd get a bunch of scholars in the room and they would argue this one out. But one of the things I'm constantly remember, since I kind of live in the 16th century, is that this is a world in which our notions of privacy and intimacy, and perhaps even love, are irrelevant. So if you're a bloke and you're going to war, or you're going hunting, or if you're a servant or you're a master or you're just traveling, you are going to be living in close quarters with other men. You're going to be sleeping with them, you're going to be eating them, and, you know, maybe your clothes fall off from time to time, and you have nice times together. And as long as you don't go public with that, as long as you don't make a song and dance about it. I mean, it's how English society is run for hundreds of years.
A
It is really.
C
As long as you don't make a fuss about it, you can do whatever you like. What's interesting to me is that Shakespeare actually foregrounds, I think, more than many of his contemporaries, homoeroticism. And between women as well, but particularly between men.
A
Does he do some lesbians as well? Because they often get missed out of this kind of stuff. You know, it's all gay, gay, gay. And then the lesbians, lesbians are stood there going, excuse me, hello.
C
You do have the problem of these boy actors again, in that you're just simply not going to get quite such a frisson if it's two boys playing girls who are getting on with each other. But I had to dig hard to find the lesbian frissons. They are there. But most notably, perhaps in the final play that Shakespeare co authored right at the end of his dramatic life, called Two Noble Kinsmen. And yeah, you have to look pretty hard for girl on girl action. It's fairly easy to find male characters who are in love with another man. Of course, just as you're not going to get real life sex simulated on stage, because remember, these are boys acting women, you're not going to get anything obvious again. The language has got to do it all. Two generations later you will get unpleasantly rape and exposure because you've got actresses on stage and everybody likes seeing women take their clothes off.
A
Is there any actual sex in any of Shakespeare's plays, like actual stage directions like kissing and fondling, or is it all just implied and suggestive? Is there any physical contact between the characters?
C
That is such a good question, and I'm not quite sure how to answer it. Kind of chapter and verse. There's certainly moments when there's a phrase like I'll stop your mouth. And the editors of the play will say, right, that means Benedick should kiss Beatrice. Shut up, woman, I'm gonna kiss you. And depending on how you look at that, that's either being a sexual predator or it's a really sexy moment. So there are these moments of kissing, but actual bed scenes. You could get pretty close with somebody like Anthony and Cleopatra, I suppose you get Cleopatra dressing up in Antony's armor.
A
What do we know about Shakespeare's actual sex life? Do we know anything? Because we can go through his plays and go, that's a bit gay or that's a bit lesbian or that's a bit saucy. But do we know anything about his sex life at all?
C
Short answer is no, except for if we're looking at timelines, we know that 18 year old Will is having sex with possibly mid-20s Anne in the summer of 1582.
A
Really?
C
Yes. And they are not married. So I think that's probably it. We know that because a baby arrived the next spring and in between time the happy couple got married and then twins followed a couple of years later. So I think that the only thing I can say with certainty is that Shakespeare had sex with Anne Hathaway and they produced three children between them. Beyond that I cannot say anything but, but, but, but what is fascinating is what we even do with those shreds of information in that a lot of people look at Shakespeare's early plays, by which time he's gone to London to make his career as an actor and then a playwright, and they'll say, oh, he's, he's traumatized, poor boy, it was a terrible marriage. He was forced into marriage Older woman, hag, hag, even 26, 27 to his young, sweet 18 year old. Isn't it awful having three kids in two years and then. And twins. No wonder he had to escape. And so a play like the Taming of the Shrewd, good old James Joyce, who I normally love, but he saw it as shrew ridden Shakespeare. That Taming of the Shrew, which is deeply punitive and very unpleasant treatment of Katharina, who's a feisty woman, is Shakespeare working out his unhappy marriage that then morphs more recently into not only is he escaping an unhappy, a forced marriage, but of course he is bisexual, stroke, homosexual. And I mean, I've read things from Stephen Greenblatt, for example. He's written a wonderful biography, but my God, I want to challenge some of his ideas that William. Sweet, sensitive, intellectual, clever. William couldn't really find what he was looking for in Anne.
A
It's a lot of guessing going on there, isn't there? I mean, considering all we know is he married Anne Hathaway, not the actress, that would be impressive. He married Anne Hathaway, they had some kids and he ends up in London. That's really all we know.
C
And again, good old archaeologists, we like archaeologists because they deal with facts, have now shown that the family home, I mean Shakespeare was sending money home, he was going home to Stratford. He wasn't completely cut off in London from the family life, he couldn't be. And then he does retire there and though I don't quite buy the soft focus thing, he's just, you know, lovely contented elderly couple bringing up their grandkids, all the rest of it. There is this sense that his life in London and his life in Stratford weren't like completely separate. He was pursuing his career and potentially with the support of his family and Anne was running a very, very successful and complex home back in Stratford and doing very well. Thank you.
A
I'll be back with Anna after this short.
B
As the holidays approach, it's time to return to the classics. Flaky pie crusts, perfectly browned butter and cookies with just the right texture and one ingredient you cannot compromise on is Kerrygold butter. Kerrygold butter is crafted with milk from grass fed cows that graze on lush green pastures across family farms in Ireland. The result, a rich creamy butter with a high butter fat content that elevates every recipe. Whether you're making signature shortbread or browning butter for a nutty depth in your pecan pie, Kerrygold makes all the difference. The flavor is unmatched and the texture it Brings to baked goods is simply divine. So this holiday season, if you're baking for loved ones or just for yourself, reach for Kerrygold. It's the butter of choice. And your pies, your cookies and your cakes will thank you.
A
What was that thing that in his will he famously left her? His second best bet. Bed.
C
Yes.
A
That like, to modern ears, sounds very peculiar. What is that?
C
It does. Well, again, give me 10 Shakespeare scholars and they'll all have different takes on this. A lot of ink has been spent on this and some people are saying, look, this has nothing to do with anything. Look at the big picture. What Shakespeare's doing is he's got two surviving daughters. As many people know, his one son died. The boy was only 11. So Shakespeare's got this problem. He's a bloke in a patriarchal society. He does not have male heirs. So he's doing a lot of shuffling around. In his final months, he's got an extra problem in his final months. His 31 year old on the shelf spinster daughter has finally got around to getting married. But a month after that marriage, which happens in Shakespeare's last year, her husband is up in the church courts for incontinence. He's been shagging somebody, there's a baby and the woman has died in childbirth. The woman he's been having an affair with.
A
Oh no. What Jerry Springer shit is this?
C
Yes. A month after the marriage. And so Shakespeare's making all these efforts to kind of secure his estate while his family life is kind of imploding. So I think the second best bed is like a red herring. I think William and Anne are fine by the standards of their time, but it's a really low bar for a happy marriage.
A
I guess there must be more to this than why so many people have felt the need to go, he was dead, definitely gay, or at least he liked the fellas. Than just. There's a lot of homoerotic subtext in some of his plays. And I suppose one of the biggest clues that people love to point to is his sonnets and the fact that so many of them are inescapably addressed to a boy. Yes. It's not even ambiguous, it's he, he, he. And they're definitely love letters. Oh, my lovely boy, who in thy power does hold Times fickle glass in his sickle hour, blah, blah, blah. It's definitely beautiful boy. He's dead pretty. I might fancy a bit of him. And that has caused endless debate of people going, they're just good friends. Stop it. You don't write to your friends like that. And other people going, definitely gay. What's your take?
C
One of my favourites is that he likes imagining these things, but he would never act on it.
A
Oh, that's fun. Yes. Yes. He's imaginary gay.
B
Yeah.
C
There are so many ways to straighten out Shakespeare's sonnets, it's astonishing. I thought about this a lot. I love Shakespeare's sonnets. I love most of them. I've heard them read at heterosexual weddings. I chose one of Shakespeare's sonnets to read when my own husband died at his funeral. This is how much I love his poetry. And for me, it was a great love poem. But, but, but that love poem I was reading as a heterosexual woman at my husband's funeral is screamingly gay as well. And I think that, to me is the glory of Shakespeare, is that he gives us words. He gives us words to talk about, to explore all our experiences. And I'm not saying let's ignore the racism, the antisemitism, the misogyny, it's all there. But there's still this sense in which maybe the most radical thing is that a poem which is about male. Male love can still mean so much to people, stripping out who's doing what to whom. In the same way those plays where boys turn into girls and girls turn back into boys and then maybe back into thee, suddenly gender and sexuality doesn't become quite as important. They don't become as crucial. Some other things go beyond that. I don't know, I might be sounding a bit woolly on this, having said that. Filth. Yeah, the sonnet's far the totally filthy place. But you're saying, I'll have a bit of that. Can I read one sonnet?
A
Oh, please do. Yes.
C
Because it's the one with acquainted in it which you'll remember, means something else. It's the really, really famous one, which is Sonnet 20, and it begins, A woman's face, with nature's own hand painted, hast thou the master mistress of my passion. So this is an expression of desire, love, whatever we want to say. The master mistress of my passion to a male who looks female, a man who looks like a woman. And then the poem goes into a bit of a riff about but you're better than women. We're back to all this misogyny, I'm afraid. A woman's gentle heart, but not acquainted with shifting change, as is false women's fashion, an eye more bright than theirs, less false in rolling. So you're better than a woman, you look like a woman, but you're better than them because they are essentially horrible, icky, false, whatever. And then this is either the tragedy of the poem or the humour or both. And for a woman wert thou first created. So the speaker saying, you know, this beautiful creature, this master mistress of my passion, was originally created as a woman. But then nature, as she wrought the fellow doting, so nature herself, capital N, loved this beautiful woman so much. Now, nature is female. Nature cannot have same sex, love. So nature turns her into a man. And this is the key bit. And by addition, add a cock. By addition, me of the defeated. I mean, I will finish the poem in a second, but this idea that simply because this man has a penis, their passion is defeated. I mean, it's painful. And then I'll just read the last few lines and now you're completely fluent in these words about nothing. You'll see. And there's a word pricked in here which means exactly what you think it is. And by addition, me of thee defeated by adding one thing to my purpose, nothing. But since she pricked thee out for women's pleasure, mine be thy love and thy love's use their treasure. So this is a man with a penis. Women will use him, he will use women. It's a pretty reductive view of sex. The speaker's love for the man is. Is not sexual because it cannot be, it cannot be, it is not permitted in the world in which this poem is written.
A
I think what's kind of very astonishing about them to me is that I've been over them and looked at them, and when you read something like that from one perspective, you first thought as a story, and it's like, calm down, there might be another reason. And you try and go through them. Like, I was thinking, well, maybe these are poems written from a woman's perspective to a male lover. Like, maybe he was commissioned to write them or something. But then you're going through them and it's like, no, it's not, though, because he's quite clearly addressing a boy as a man. And it's inescapable, isn't it? It's right there. This is a love letter from a man to another man.
C
Yeah, I totally agree. As I say, I've seen every attempt to straighten out these poems and every single one of them fail.
A
Yeah.
C
Interestingly, I've also seen attempts to kind of smooth out the misogyny, the extreme hatred, the expense of spirit in a waste of shame. Spirit is semen.
A
It's pretty bad, isn't you can tell.
C
Me whether this is actually true. I've read somewhere that if a man ejaculates, the belief was at that time they lost five minutes or an hour of their life.
A
Oh yeah, that goes right back to the ancient world.
C
It's been hanging around for a while, as it were. So the expense of spirit ejaculate is a waste, but it also means the waste is the middle area of the woman. So sex between a man and woman is just a waste of time, a waste of energy, a waste of spirit, and it's, it's horrible.
A
He isn't nice to women really, Shakespeare, is he?
C
No.
A
If we accept that like the man writing to another man, he really fancies him. But what does that tell us about same sex relationships at that time? Because, you know, it's tempting to think that it's all fire and brimstone and thou shalt not, and you know, people being executed for this stuff. But here he is just writing, oh, really? Love you, like women are shit to shag. I want to and all that stuff. Does that change our view?
C
I think the misogyny nobody would have patterned.
A
Oh, no one would have cared about that.
C
The but as it were, is that it's always but I can't. I mean, so many people have said this is just a ramped up version of male, male friendship. They're just good friends. And I've seen that over and over.
A
I've never written to a friend like that.
C
No, no. And also with friends there aren't relentless jokes about cocks and nothings.
A
And no, if a friend wrote to me and said that they wanted to come on my stomach, but that would be a waste. I would not consider them a friend anymore. That. That's kicked it up a notch in my book with something else.
C
Then I think there is also humor. There's an amazing poem which has got a phrase in it which I, I've thought of at the most inappropriate moments. It's 14 lines joking about his name. Now we know William Shakespeare wrote the sonnets, but there's a character, the speaker is suddenly identified as will and will means penis, but it can also confusingly mean vagina and desire and all sorts of other things. And so if you look at that poem, it says, I offer you will in over plus. And I just love that. And that's being offered to the woman. Yes, I'll take will in over plus, whatever that might mean. There's a kind of playfulness in that poem that you don't get that often in the Sonnets. So what would people at the time have made of Shakespeare playing these games with language, with sexuality, with gender, what have you? Well, the truth is that other people were doing it in more obvious ways. You've got Christopher Marlowe writing a play about Edward II and having Edward ii, a king, being killed by a hot poker up his bum. Yeah. This is not happy stuff. You've got a poet called Richard Barnfield writing an openly, explicitly homoerotic series of poems. But what both those examples do is they distance in some way. So Edward II is history, people. There's a bit of space.
B
Yes.
C
Richard Barnfield, it's pastoral poetry. These are shepherds, and it all happened a long time ago. Interesting about Shakespeare is he brings it here now to the streets of London, to a world of sexually transmitted diseases, of pubs and bars and what have you, and actors fighting amongst themselves. And I think in a way, that's one of his bravest steps. We may not like what we're reading, but it's happening here and now. These aren't shepherds and other shepherds.
A
So tell me about the other notorious figure in these sonnets that has had people for hundreds of years going, it might be this person. It might be this person, the dark lady that he writes to a lot. I mean, there's been so much speculation about who is this dark lady.
C
Yeah. I'm gonna really spoil things by saying.
A
Go on.
C
The word dark is only used once in the sonnets, and it might not even refer to the woman. And the word lady is never used. So the dark lady, as an idea, is a complete destruction of what white critics. Yes, I know. I know. It's shocking when I. When I found that out. And the reason I found that out is because I was working on one of the contenders to be the dark lady, Emilia Bassano, who became Emilia Lagna, a poet in her own right and certainly was kind of around at the same time, but the dates don't quite work. So the dark lady is another one of these things. We just become obsessed with something that really isn't actually in the poem. What there is is a woman character who is desired by the speaker against his will. Lots of puns intended. He hates himself for desiring this woman. And they sometimes have sex, they sometimes don't have sex. Sometimes she has sex with his friends, sometimes she's angry with them. It's a brilliant study of a profoundly dysfunctional, utterly sexual relationship, whereas the other relationship with the young man is dysfunctional in a completely different way. Who she was, I have absolutely no idea. And I really, really don't buy the whole thing that Shakespeare would write into. The thing is, oh, he has venereal disease in 1602 and that's why Anne won't have him back. And that's what the word stain in Sonnet X means. We're picking out one word and saying, well, that means he's got syphilis or something like that. So in answer to your question, I don't think there's a real woman behind these sonnets. What I do think is that there's got to be. This is deeply unprofessional of me as an academic to say I like unprofessional. It's back to what you're saying. The energy and the intensity of those poems of longing, of desire, of frustration, of love towards the young man, the beautiful young man, I think that's got to be, even if we're being completely cynical, is to impress some young nobleman, somebody with money, somebody's going to finance his next play. Maybe. But I still think there might have been a real young man.
A
Hey, this is Paige from Giggly Squad and today I want to talk to you about Boost Mobile. The holidays are pure chaos. Gifts to buy, people to see, and somehow zero time for yourself. Boost Mobile is here to make at least one thing easy. When you bring your own device and switch to boost Mobile's $25 Unlimited plan, you get unlimited talk, text and data for just $25 a month. No trade ins, no contracts, no stress, just savings. That actually makes sense because, let's be real, it feels good to treat yourself while you're doing everything for everyone else. Visit boostmobile.com to start saving. After 30 gigabytes, customers may experience slower speed beads. Customers will pay $25 per month as long as they remain active on Boost Mobile Unlimited plan.
B
As the holidays approach, it's time to return to the classics. Flaky pie crusts, perfectly browned butter and cookies with just the right texture. And one ingredient you cannot compromise on is Kerrygold butter. Kerrygold butter is crafted with milk from grass fed cows that graze on lush green pastures across family farms in Ireland. The result, A rich, creamy butter with a high butter fat content that elevates every recipe. Whether you're making signature shortbread or browning butter for a nutty depth in your pecan pie, Kerrygold makes all the difference. The flavor is unmatched and the texture it brings to baked goods is simply divine. So this holiday season, if you're baking for loved ones or just for yourself, reach For Kerrygold, it's the butter of choice. And your pies, your cookies and your cakes will thank you.
A
I'm still reeling from the fact that you've just said there's no dark lady. There is a sonnet to her though, isn't it? Isn't there?
C
What?
A
Have I just imagined all of this? Have I hallucinated the whole thing?
C
No, no, no. There are loads and loads of sonnets towards the end of the sequence addressed to a woman.
A
Oh, thank God. I sort of thought I'd have some kind of Shakespearean breakdown.
C
My mistress's eyes are nothing like. It's like, yeah, my mistress. My mistress, yes. Yeah, there's a mistress, there's a character. And in all these sonnet sequences you've got a cast of characters, and this is true of Philip Sidney and Richard Barnfield, all the rest of it, who are kind of bed hopping. It's like a soap opera. So, yeah, there is a mistress in there who is female and has female body parts and there's a relationship that goes on. But there's this one moment that it says her hairs are like wires. People have extrapolated out from that. She's described as hell, which is not quite the same thing as saying that she's dark skinned, black, Jewish, whatever. You know, we're going to interpret dark as. Yeah, it's weird, isn't it, how much has been written about this woman?
A
One of my favorite theories about the dark lady is that she was a real sex worker who was working in a brothel near the Globe Theater who went by the name of, I think something like Black Bet or Black Loose, I think was her name, who actually is in the historical records. I was so invested in that story. I want that to be true.
C
I want that to be true as well. Partly because I think there's a fascinating and probably you've written it and I'm going to put my foot in it book about how Shakespeare represents the sex industry in his plays.
A
That's not me, I'm afraid. No, actually, no, I did write that. That's totally me. It's not.
C
Yeah, I mean, one of the great things about Shakespeare is that his plays are so open to interpretation. And not just because they're plays and they're going to be performed, but because there are kind of fault lines in almost everything and it allows us to do what we want with it. But that's true of his representation of sex workers, of punks, whores, whatever it's called. Particularly in Measure for Measure, a play that intrigues Me, it's a regime change play. This is the only play again that Shakespeare sets in a city that looks a bit like London. It begins with the idea that the brothels in the play are going to be torn down as a kind of clean up London act. It's set in Vienna, but doesn't matter. This really is London, which is exactly what's going on in London at the time in 1604. And so Shakespeare's taking topical stuff and he's setting his play in these brothels that are condemned. The people in them are condemned. But the only trouble is follow your own logic. Does that mean if you have sex with a prostitute you're going to hell? In all sorts of ways. Literally going to hell every time you her.
A
See, I think an educated guess, and this is the problem is it's all guesswork. But I would be very, very surprised if Shakespeare and his contemporaries didn't have immediate associations with the sex industry of London. Because theatres were notorious cruising grounds for people selling sex and buying sex, weren't they?
C
Yeah, I mean the sex and theater industry are absolutely symbiotic, no question about that at all. You haven't yet got the actresses being sex workers, quarter sounds, whatever you want to call them, which you're going to do a couple of generations later. But it was one of the number one reasons that moralists did not like theatreland, nor did they like boys dressing up as women. Because of course that would encourage unnatural lusts in the audience.
A
Of course. It's such a fascinating subject, isn't it? Because sex is inescapably woven throughout Shakespeare. Like even the best attempts to sanitize it and tell us that they were just good friends and, and no, that isn't what that word means. And prick meant something completely different back then. It's an absolute smutfest. And yet we know so little about the man who actually wrote it. Next to nothing at all.
C
And it's one of the reasons I think he's still so much part of our culture. I mean, would it help if there was 100 volumes of letters? For example, one of his contemporaries, one of the guys he worked with, Edward Alleyne, we got letters from him to his wife and he calls her my good sweet mouse. And he writes to her about the garden and how much he's missing her and it's absolutely lovely. But if we have those letters from Shakespeare, would it somehow make him a bit. I don't know, maybe.
A
That's an interesting point. If suddenly you had the answers to everything, if he was Just writing home to Anne about, you know, and explaining, oh, I don't really fancy boys. I just got commissioned to write this thing and yes, maybe you're right, maybe that would suddenly become quite dull, wouldn't it, if it was.
C
So it's this lovely blank canvas where we can project all our Shakespeares on and all our own desires and all our own societies questions about these things. But I do need to come back to another contender for the young man in the sonnets and then later on as the dedicatee for the sonnets when they were published. So they were written early in Shakespeare's career, 1590s and published 20 years later. Really very big gap for the time. In fact, they were completely out of fashion by the time they came out in print. But the Earl of Southampton, a lot of people think he is the man. You can look at it two ways. You can look at it cynically, professionally, practically. This is. He's an earl, for goodness sake. That means he's got, you know, power, patronage, money, all the rest of it. He's also profoundly, I want to say, feminine. There's a portrait of him that was only revealed to be of him in 2002. It was always thought to be of a lady until that point. So this is a man who presents as master mistress. So for all these reasons, and I should add, Shakespeare dedicates his first two volumes of poetry, Venus and Adonis and the Rape of Decrease, to the Earl of Southampton. So you've got this connection. The only trouble is this is where it gets a bit boring. Yeah. Is that a fantasy? I could dedicate my next book to you and hope for the glittering prizes that might fall from your celebrity status, but you might think, who the hell is this woman? You know, it's not necessarily going to work like that. So there was a lot of speculative dedications going on, trying to get in with somebody. But nevertheless, in terms of kind of gender bending, the master mistress things, the Earl of Southampton fits with that. To complicate matters, when he was younger again, this is trajectory you see for a lot. Well, not a lot of men, but a healthy minority of men is that they are experimental in their youth, shall we say, is like Bill Clinton's not inhaling and then tick, tick, tick, the box marries, has a good soldier's career. In fact, people say he can't be gay because he becomes a soldier.
A
Oh, now that's just silly.
C
So Earl of Southampton fits this template that you're talking about. He's sort of hiding in plain sight as a Young man, master, mistress. But as he gets older, he becomes more and more establishment. And Shakespeare, or whoever put out Shakespeare's Sonnets doesn't dedicate it to Earl of Southampton. And more importantly, the Folio edition is not dedicated to Earl of Southampton. So is that because Earl becomes too straight, too boring? Or is it just because Shakespeare was running with a particular crowd in the early 1590s who were into their cross dressing and trying to get a bit of patronage? Yeah, just getting food on the table for the little kiddies back home in Stratford. I've got one more thing I've just come across that had to be buried in a footnote and was certainly not going to be brought out for the year. Four school kids, you're asking what would people have made of the very, very obvious sexual innuendos throughout Shakespeare's work? Well, not only do we not know about William Shakespeare's life, but he wrote almost nothing, in fact zero, I'd say, about his own writing. He was not a self reflecting author. He didn't care whether his books came out. He had no interest in all that. Fortunately, we've got an example of somebody who's completely opposite Ben Jonson, the guy who was mainly responsible for getting the plays out in print after Shakespeare's death. Ben Johnson, we know, collected that kind of classical literature, Latin literature, that was unadulterated filth, explicit, and he had uncut versions. There were the cleaned up versions that the schoolboys had and then the uncut versions. Always the same in culture. So he's got uncut Marshall and Epigram 2.28, if you want to look it up, people. And there's a guy in epigram 2.28 who is abstaining from all the penetrative sexual activities. I'm reading from notes here, okay, And Marshall says two possibilities remain and then moves on. Ben Johnson, in his notes on this, he's annotating his erotic poetry. Always the scholar notes in the margin that there are two possibilities, fellator and cunning. These are attentive readers and I'm absolutely sure Ben Johnson knew Shakespeare, worked with them all the rest of it. They're in a world in which uncut versions of these classical works are circulating. And so perhaps we forget just how un prudish they were. The things they were reading were. And no wonder.
A
My favourite part about that entire story is the idea of somebody annotating their porn to Salaf, my husband Johnson, that porn annotator, just making little notes. You do it today, just like that's not what a builder looks like. He would never fix her washing machine with that wrench. I'm not having this. Oh, and you've been so much fun to talk to. My final question for you. This might be a mean one. What is your favorite Shakespearean sex joke? What? What's the one that you might even laugh at? Like, you know, if you go and watch a Shakespeare play, everyone laughs really hard at the jokes to show that they got the jokes and everyone else is sort of sat there going, I don't think I understood that. And then they go, well, you have to know Shakespeare. But, like, what's your favorite proper Shakespeare joke that would actually make you laugh?
C
That is a curveball because so many of them are so nasty and they make me sad.
A
You laugh and then you go, oh, I'm a horrible.
C
Yeah, I'm a horrible, horrible person. I think I've already mentioned one of them. I do love the sonnet about Will in Over plus. That'll do for me. But I think the fact that I'm really struggling with this. Am I allowed to bring in another author?
A
Yeah, yeah, you are absolutely.
C
So Philip Sidney also wrote his sonnets, and he kicked off the whole craze for it 10 years before Shakespeare. And in there, it took me a long time to realize that this was a filthy joke. He's pleading with a woman, married woman, who he desires. He says, you know, you'll cry over something you read. You'll cry at the movies, but why won't you feel some pity for me? He ends the thing I am not. I don't think of me as me. Pity the tail of me. And for years I thought, oh, how beautiful the tail of me. It's my story. Listen to me. Listen to me. And then I realized, tail is penis, so have pity on my. And so I like. I like that if somebody used that line on me, it would work. Yes, that's that.
A
You've just been amazing. If people want to know more about you and your work, where can they find you?
C
They can find me on Twitter. Narosebeer.
A
Thank you so much for coming on and telling me all about rude Shakespeare. This has been amazing.
C
Thank you very much indeed. But you've made me think I need to find a joke that I actually think is funny.
A
You need to find your favourite joke. That is your homework assignment. Okay, thank you. Thank you for listening. And thank you so much to Anna for joining me. And if you like what you heard, don't forget to, like, review and follow along whatever it is you get. Your podcasts. Coming up, we are going to be finding out how single women could survive in medieval Britain and we'll be meeting Scotland's Witch Queen. If you would like us to explore a subject, or if you just fancied saying hello, then you can email us@betwixtoryhit.com this podcast was edited by Tom Delaghi and produced by Sophie G. The senior producer was Charlotte Charlotte Long. Join me again Betwixt the Sheets the History of Sex Scandal in Society A podcast by History hit. This podcast contains music from Epidemic Sound.
C
Did you know 39% of teen drivers admit to texting while driving. Even scarier, those who text are more likely to speed and run red lights. Shockingly, 94% know it's dangerous, but do it anyway. As a parent, you can't always be in the car, but you can stay connected to their safety with Greenlight Infinity's driving reports. Monitor their driving habits, see if they're using their phone, speeding, and more. These reports provide real data for meaningful conversations about safety. Plus, with weekly updates, you can track their progress over time. Help keep your teens safe. Sign up for Greenlight infinity@Greenlight.com podcast.
Host: Dr. Kate Lister
Guest: Anna Beer, cultural historian & biographer
Date: December 30, 2025
Dr. Kate Lister sits down with cultural historian and biographer Anna Beer to peel back the covers on one of the most mythologized writers of all time: William Shakespeare. The duo dive into the Bard’s bawdiest jokes, gender play, and the oft-debated evidence for queerness and sexual intrigue in his works. They also take on popular myths about Shakespeare’s personal life, and the often overlooked context of Elizabethan attitudes toward sex, gender, and the theatre.
| Topic | Timestamp (MM:SS) | |-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------| | Shakespeare's sauciness & "nothing" as vulva slang | 04:30 - 06:33 | | Gender performance and cross-dressing on stage | 09:39 - 10:49 | | Queer love in the plays (Hamlet & Horatio, others) | 12:01 - 15:00 | | The sonnets and homoeroticism | 27:38 - 32:15 | | Shakespeare's real sex life (marriage, evidence) | 21:11 - 23:16 | | The “second best bed” and family drama | 25:25 - 26:52 | | The myth of the “dark lady” | 35:56 - 40:07 | | Sex work & theatre culture | 42:30 - 43:11 | | Favourite Shakespearean sex joke | 49:33 - 50:47 |
This episode lays bare Shakespeare’s deep engagement with sex, sexuality, and gender, underscoring just how much modern audiences have sanitized or minimized his bawdiness. Lister and Beer emphasize how little concrete is known about Shakespeare’s real love life, but how much is implied—gleefully, publicly, and often queerly—in his works. The takeaway: Shakespeare’s centuries-old smut and sophisticated explorations of gender and desire still unsettle, amuse, and spark debate now as they did then.
For further reading and updates from Anna Beer, find her on Twitter (@narosebeer).