Host (2:46)

We keep seeing these huge job cut announcements coming out of big companies. And that seems to be making a lot of big news and making people really anxious about the job market. But you get a report like this and it's like, well, there was a lot of really positive things that happened.

Molly Smith (3:01)

The U.S. economy added 130,000 jobs last month, according to the BLS report, far more than economists were projecting. And the unemployment rate actually dropped to 4.3%. The takeaway, the 2026 labor market could be stronger than we thought.

Host (3:20)

To see the way that the January numbers came in, not just the beat in hiring, but also the drop in the unemployment rate, which was not expected, really just showed that the labor market seems to be gaining its footing.

Molly Smith (3:32)

But Molly says the other takeaway is that the labor market of 2025 was weaker than originally reported.

Host (3:40)

The pace of hiring originally last year was around 49,000 jobs added per month on average. The revisions today show that was just 15,000. In the world of economics, that's basically nothing. So that's really not a great number.

Molly Smith (3:56)

The Federal Reserve will be weighing all these numbers as it sets rates in the months ahead, and Molly says the odds are now looking better that it will stay the course.

Host (4:05)

For the Fed, this means that they're fairly justified in holding interest rates right now. You know, there really is no rush to, to cut interest rates when you have an economy, a job market that seems to be steadying the way that it is. And it looked like in hindsight that the time that the cuts that they already made were fairly well timed.

Molly Smith (4:27)

I'm Sarah Holder and this is the big take from Bloomberg News today. On the show, the US labor market shows signs of stabilizing after a really slow year. What today's jobs numbers mean for job seekers, employers, and the Fed. So let's talk about what the report revealed about the state of the labor market right now. Those January numbers. Where are the bright spots and where are there areas of concern in the January jobs report?

Host (4:59)

So I guess you could call this a bright spot, but also an area of concern was that health care continues to dominate hiring, actually have like the most amount of jobs added since 2020. And healthcare dominated hiring last year, too. Really was the majority of all job growth. Ideally, you'd want to see more breadth of hiring and seeing this across more industries. There were some other industries, though, that did add jobs. Manufacturing notably. First time in a long time that we saw job gains there. We saw federal government continue to cut jobs. Not really surprising. That's more or less the industry breakdown. Looking to some other positive aspects we also get another survey in the jobs report that is a survey of households that showed that more people voluntarily quit their jobs, which usually is a sign that you feel pretty confident in your ability to find a new one. That number has been pretty low for the most part. You know, people who feel fairly insecure, don't really think this is a good time and you know, just up and leave your job.

Molly Smith (5:58)

Right, the big freeze. Right. That's what people were talking about, people too afraid to leave their jobs. That seems to be changing perhaps.

Host (6:04)

I mean, you know, another thing, a convist, while we tell you, is only one month of data. But if sustained, that could be a sign that maybe things are turning. You saw far less people reported that they're working part time for economic reasons. So that's something that had been climbing. Also a sign, you know, of some financial distress. So that was positive to see that fall.

Molly Smith (6:23)

And one of the other things that was on people's minds heading into this jobs report were these headline grabbing layoffs. Amazon announced it would be cutting about 16,000 jobs in January. The Washington Post, also owned by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, fired more than 300 journalists. How are those layoffs showing up in the job market right now? And are there signs of some industries contracting or were these kind of outliers?

Host (6:48)

It's hard to reconcile the two because you see these announcements of layoffs from these big companies you mentioned, Amazon UPS was another, and they haven't really translated into actual layoffs in aggregate for the most part. One thing to note is that announcements are simply announcements. They're not necessarily meaning that people are going to be fired right then and there. Of course at the Post they unfortunately were. But in a lot of these other companies that can be spread out for months, you know, when those actual layoffs might happen. So even though we have had a lot of these announcements, they haven't in the data shown up as far as actual layoffs will go.

Molly Smith (7:30)

Yeah, that's, that's really helpful. So those kinds of announcements could show up in, you know, a March report.

Host (7:36)

Or a April report, or they might not show up at all. Maybe it was an announcement that was, you know, at one point in January. Who knows? Maybe things change and they weren't actually enacted.

Molly Smith (7:46)

When you look back over decades, job creation has often been tied to a growing economy.

Host (7:51)

Right.

Molly Smith (7:51)

Is the dynamic any different now given the growth of AI worries that AI is coming for Americans jobs? Should these numbers be viewed through a different lens at all?

Host (8:01)

I mean, obviously we had a great report today, but I think in general, it's absolutely fair to say that, you know, the labor market has absolutely slowed down from, you know, those post pandemic peaks, and that we have seen one that has been gradually cooling now for a number of years. Today's does not change that. And it's difficult to then reconcile that with what has been really strong GDP numbers that you see an economy that is expanding at some of the fastest paces in years, yet the labor market has been fairly slow. The reason why you can look at those things is because the way that GDP is actually calculated has nothing to do with the job market, which is also why it's a difficult way to measure the US Economy. So the economy has been growing as fast as it is in the last few quarters, largely because of a reversal in trade policy. You know, that there had been such a huge rush at the beginning of 2025 to import as much as companies could ahead of those expected tariffs that did come in April. And the way that GDP is calculated, that would then add to growth when you don't have import activity as strong, all else equal. So that's been a lot of what's been keeping GDP so elevated. And that's why it's hard to then look at the job market next to that and see how the two compare.

Molly Smith (9:24)

Well, I also want to look closer at some of the revisions. Annual revisions are released every January. The report we got today showed that last year's job market was weaker than originally reported. How much weaker and how do we know?

Host (9:37)

So this is where it gets. Also, there's so many layers to this. There's a few different kinds of revisions that BLS carries out. There's one that was the main headline revision. We call it the benchmark revision. And that has to do with basically incorporating a more accurate but less timely employment series that is based on actual, like unemployment insurance records. So that's. It just has a bit of a lag. It's a quarterly series, so that one updated payrolls through March of 2025. And then there's another set of revisions that updates how BLS accounts for businesses that open and close the net number between those two that impacts the rest of 2025, as well as, you know, a model that then influenced payrolls beyond that. And then there's also an adjustment of how BLS factors for seasonal adjustment factors. So all of those things combined, it's a lot going on. I think the easiest way to think about this is that over the course of 2025, the average pace of monthly job growth was now 15,000 versus initially reported 49,000. That essentially incorporates all of the revisions together. And I think that's the easiest way to think about it.

Molly Smith (10:48)

How does that stack up historically? How should we think about that number? How low is that?

Host (10:54)

It's low. It's like I'm trying to. That's essentially like the same as like there really was no hiring. Like that's what we would call anemic, you know, undynamic, barely chugging along. Like there was like, not really a whole lot happening.

Molly Smith (11:10)

Molly, you've walked us through all the different kinds of revisions that we're looking at in conversation right now. Can you remind us why these revisions happen every year? What new information does the BLS incorporate in this data?

Host (11:23)

Right, so the big one is what I had referred to as that series that is more accurate but less timely. It's called the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, QCEW for short. And that is really what a lot of people would say is probably like the one of the more accurate series of employment that we get. You know, this is just how statistics work. And that if you want to balance speed and accuracy, you have to accept that as you get more data that numbers are going to be different. And that's just a trade off that you have to be comfortable with. You want to see the first Friday of the following month what the jobs number was. People don't have the patience to wait longer for when more data will come in. So if you're going to demand that kind of speed, you have to then accept that as more data comes in in subsequent months, quarters, even years, that the numbers are going to be revised. And in time, that does make the numbers more accurate.

Molly Smith (12:22)

I mean, that speaks to something else that's significant about this report, is that the data is backward looking at this point. So what does it mean for how we should be viewing the labor market today that there was, you know, barely chugging along job growth in 2025. What does that mean for 2026?

Host (12:37)

Well, it sets the bar a little low for where we're starting from, that's for sure. But if you look at, say that now the average pace of monthly job growth in 2025 was 15,000 compared to today's number was 130,000. Just comparing those two, obviously there's a lot more going on. That seems like more than stabilizing to me. I mean, that's like a pretty huge surge.

Molly Smith (12:58)

But I guess we'll know next year how that number is revised.

Host (13:01)

We'll even see next month, how that number is revised on the following month. And again, this happens multiple times. So we'll see how that 130 number sticks. But as it stands today, I think we can say that Powell did have the right idea when he spoke at the January Fed meeting that the labor market does appear to be stabilizing. It's not just the unemployment rate that perhaps hiring to is maybe picking up a little bit as well.

Molly Smith (13:30)

So the January jobs report held good signs about the labor market in the year ahead. But with layoffs in the news and affordability a growing concern, how will the public, politicians and the Fed respond? That's next.

Sponsor Announcer (13:47)

Support for the show comes from Public. Public is an investing platform that offers access to stocks, options, bonds and crypto, and they've also integrated AI with tools that can assist investors in building customized portfolios. One of these tools is called Generated Assets. It allows you to turn your ideas into investable indexes. So let's say you're interested in something specific like biotech companies with high R and D spend, small cap stocks with improving operating margins, or the S&P 500 minus high debt companies. Chances are there isn't an ETF that fits your exact criteria. But on Public you just type in a prompt and their AI screens thousands of stocks and builds a one of a kind index. You can even backtest it against the S&P 500. Then you can invest in a few clicks, go to public.com market and earn an uncapped 1% bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com market ad paid for by.

Sponsor Disclaimer (14:41)

Public Holdings Brokerage Services by public investing member FINRA SIPC advisory services by public advisors SEC registered advisor crypto services by ZeroHash sample prompts are for illustrative purposes only, not investment advice. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures@public.com disclosures hey, this is.

Molly Smith (15:00)

US Olympic gold medalist Tara Davis Woodhull.

Host (15:02)

And I'm US Paralympic gold medalist Hunter Woodhull.

Molly Smith (15:05)

As athletes, our lives are about having.

Host (15:07)

A clear path and a team that you can absolutely trust.

Molly Smith (15:10)

So when it came to getting the.

Host (15:11)

Best mortgage, we chose PennyMac.

Molly Smith (15:13)

PennyMac is proud to be the official mortgage provider of Team USA and you.

EV Announcer (15:18)

Learn more at pe pennymac.com PennyMac Loan Services, LLC equal housing lender NMLS ID 35953 licensed by the Department of Financial.

Host (15:25)

Protection and Innovation under the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act. Conditions and restrictions may apply.

EV Announcer (15:30)

You ever wonder how far an EV can take you on one charge? Well, most people drive about 40 miles a day, which means you can do all daily stuff no problem. Go to work, grab the kids at school, get the groceries and still have enough charge to visit your in laws in the next county. But they don't need to know that. And the best part, you won't have to buy gas at all. The way forward is electric. Explore EVs that fit your life at electricforall.org.

Molly Smith (16:05)

This month's Sunny jobs report doesn't address Americans persistent concerns about inflation and affordability. And it's not likely to diminish the sense of a vibe session the idea that many people feel like the economy isn't working for them regardless of what the economic data show. So I asked Bloomberg U.S. economy Editor Molly Smith how she reconciles the strong January jobs numbers with people's current perceptions of the labor market.

Host (16:34)

This is what's been really challenging about squaring survey data with what we call hard data, and that the surveys are consistently far more negative than what the actual numbers show. There is a survey that the government conducts that it's a hypothetical. It asks if you had to pay for an emergency $400 expense, could you do it? And that's something that people have tracked for a long time and how that share has like declined by and large for a while. But there was another survey provider who actually asked people, did you have an expense and were you able to pay it? Not do you think you can, but were you able to what actually happened? And by and large people were able to pay it. So I think some of that just goes to show that people maybe are more resilient than they report to be and will find a way.

Molly Smith (17:24)

You know, we did the other survey that I always look at is how likely do you think it would be to find another job if you were fired tomorrow?

Host (17:33)

Right.

Molly Smith (17:33)

And that number when it's low feels really anxiety inducing about the state of the economy. But as you said, you need to kind of match that with the actual odds of finding another job or people's actual success rates in finding a job.

Host (17:48)

Right. Like, did you actually quit your job and try to find another one? Or that's just your case sitting here employed today. If you took a guess, if you were in that situation, and I think that's where you see a huge divergence in some of these numbers. That's also why the economy as a whole is also still doing really well, that we look at these sentiment surveys, particularly for what it means for consumer spending, which you would think based on these surveys that people aren't spending any money at all. But that's not at all what the actual data suggests. And that spending is still holding up really well, as is the overall economy.

Molly Smith (18:23)

So, I mean, given the fact that how people feel about the economy really matters politically, I'm wondering what this report means for the Trump administration.

Host (18:32)

Well, he did just tweet or post that, you know, great job numbers today. You know, the golden age is upon us. Everything looks great. Which, you know, is a little bit of, like, selective attention, I would say.

Molly Smith (18:43)

On his part, because he was president all last year.

Host (18:46)

That, too. But we had a positive aspect of the report to focus on. I'm not saying that he was wrong to focus on that, but I'm saying it's a little bit selective and maybe excluding the part of where he presided over 2025.

Molly Smith (18:57)

Right, right. I mean, in August, the Bureau of Labor Statistics revised some of its data downward, saying the U.S. economy added fewer jobs than it had previously said. And Trump called the numbers rigged. He fired the BLS commissioner. We talked about it on the podcast, but he hasn't had that kind of reaction this time.

Host (19:13)

Not that I've seen so far. I mean, the day is young. Who knows? There's a lot of positives to take from this, but, you know, for somebody who has been very critical of this data agency, of the revisions that they make, what it says about the labor market as a whole, it seems to be omitting that entire chunk of the equation.

Molly Smith (19:31)

So we're also getting a report on the Consumer Price Index, which measures inflation this Friday. How do today's jobs numbers, which are generally better than expected for January, change, How we're going to view those inflation numbers? How are you going to put those two numbers in conversation?

Host (19:47)

Well, something else that we saw in this jobs report today that we didn't get into was wage growth, which was a bit stronger than expected. So, you know, usually that is the real engine, of course, of, like, consumer spending, of, like, what your pay is. And to see then how that might factor into demand for goods and services and how that could affect their prices in January. I think that would be the correlation we would look for.

Molly Smith (20:11)

And I mean, a body that will be looking very closely at the CPI data and the jobs data is the Federal Reserve, of course. What is this jobs report mean for the chances that they cut rates in the next meeting?

Host (20:26)

Oh, that was already about zero to say, like a cut for March. That wasn't going to happen. Coming into this report, the expectation was more around June for the cut to happen at that meeting. But after today, basically that shows that again, that, like what Powell's been saying, that like, you know, policy is well positioned right now, we feel like we're in a good place, we can adjust if needed, and that there is no urgency to cut all of that. Very much validated today. You see that the way Trump reacted to the numbers, saying that, you know, we had such great job numbers is, you know, we should be playing among the lowest interest rates in the world. It's a little bit more complicated than that, that, you know, if you're seeing the job market grow that the way it is, you wouldn't think you would need lower interest rates to support it. And that's how the Fed is looking at this.

Molly Smith (21:11)

In May, we could see a new Fed chair. Kevin Warsh is Trump's pick for the job. Has Warsh respond these numbers at all? How might this change his thinking?

Host (21:21)

I think it's gonna make things very complicated for him. You know, that again, there's a lot of time between now and May. He also has to be confirmed first. But basically he took this job with the understanding that the President wants him to cut interest rates. Obviously, it's not just his decision. There's a whole body of policymakers, but certainly, you know, the chair tries to rally a consensus and speaks for the entire central bank. So Trump did say like, that the understanding of like war shaking this job is that he's going to cut rates. And of course, Warsh knows that too. The whole country knows that, the whole world knows that, that this is what Trump wants. The numbers make that again, as we said here today, a bit more complicated. This doesn't look like an economy right now that is calling for any immediate cut to interest rates.

Molly Smith (22:13)

This is the big take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder. To get more from the Big Take and unlimited access to all of bloomberg.com subscribe today@bloomberg.com podcastoffer thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.

EV Announcer (22:39)

You ever wonder how far an EV can take you on one charge? Well, most people drive about 40 miles a day, which means you can do all daily stuff no problem. Go to work, grab the kids at school, get the groceries and still have enough charge to visit your in laws in the next county. But they don't need to know that. And the best part, you won't have to buy gas at all. The way forward is electric. Explore EVs that fit your life at electricforall.org.

Lenovo Announcer (23:08)

In the heat of battle, your squad relies on you. Don't let them down. Unlock elite gaming tech@lenovo.com dominate every match with next level speed, seamless streaming, and performance that won't quit. Push your gameplay beyond performance with Intel Core Ultra processors for the next era of gaming. Upgrade to smooth, high quality streaming with Intel Wi Fi 6e and maximize game performance with enhanced overclocking. Win the Tech Search Power up at Lenovo.

Venmo Announcer (23:39)

With Venmo Stache a taco in one hand and ordering a ride in the other means you're stacking cash back. Nice. Get up to 5% cash back with Venmo Stash on your favorite brands when you pay with your Venmo debit card. From takeout to ride shares, entertainment, and more, pick a bundle with your go tos and start earning cash back at those brands. Earn more cash when you do more with Stash. Venmo Stash terms and exclusions apply. Max $100 cash back per month. See terms at Venmo Me Stash terms.